In Australia, an estimated 1 in 10 households experiences food insecurity. The objective of this study was to devise a visual synthesis to summarise the activities, processes and principles that support the right to food for everyone in Australia.
Semi-structured key informant interviews (n=30) were conducted during 2019–20. Content analysis synthesised perspectives and assisted co-authors in revising an initial draft (shared during the interview) to finalise the road map through semantic realist data analysis and re-design.
The six components of the right to food road map summarise the actions, processes, and principles to address the human right to food. These include i) policy leadership, ii) advocate and enact, iii) empowerment, iv) resourcing, v) monitoring and accountability and vi) healthy, equitable and sustainable food systems.
When all the right to food actions, processes and principles are present, the “cogs” within the map are hypothesised to interact and realise the right to food for all Australians.
Considering the cost of living pressures and unrelenting demand for food relief, better solutions are needed for food insecurity. Human rights - this language, their international recognition and as a “method of working”, offer an alternative to the dominant responses to food insecurity.
This study explores experiences of the Healthy Housing Initiative (HHI). Aimed at children at risk of housing-related illness, the HHI package includes the provision of items such as curtains, heaters, bedding, and insulation, advocacy to encourage landlords to install improvements, and education and advice to help people optimise their home environment.
We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 20 people living in rental housing who received the HHI intervention.
Participants felt heard and supported by HHI assessors. They reported that the intervention increased the warmth and dryness of the home, improved their respiratory and mental health, reduced their bills, and enabled the use of more parts of their home. However, some continued to live in cold and damp conditions due to structural inadequacies and energy poverty.
The qualitative evidence presented in this study shows how health-focussed interventions also benefit quality of life.
This research emphasises that healthy housing interventions can yield extensive benefits by adopting a holistic and home-based approach. Such interventions have the potential to create improvements in individuals' lives far beyond health.
To describe the operational model, epidemiology and outcomes of COVID-19 cases managed by the first decentralised Victorian Public Health Unit (PHU) in the Barwon South-West (BSW) region in 2020.
The Barwon Health team used a clinician-led, locally-based interprofessional model of care, combining clinical care and monitoring, contact tracing and public health measures.
From 7th March to 5th October 2020, 575 confirmed COVID-19 cases (82 in Wave 1; 493 in Wave 2) were identified in residents of the BSW region. Overall, 4.7% were admitted to local hospitals (0.7% to intensive care units) and 1.7% died. COVID-19 incidence in the region was 129 cases/100,000. Wave 2 in the region featured community transmission in high-risk settings and among culturally and linguistically diverse and mobile populations. Within 3 months of the initial local case in Wave 2, SARS-COV-2 was eliminated from the community.
A local interprofessional model of care was key to the containment of community transmission and complex outbreaks with the elimination of COVID-19 in the community.
Key successes and learnings from the BSW PHU contributed to the improvement of statewide systems and responses and provided an impetus for the implementation of a decentralised public health model for Victoria.
Post-licensure vaccine safety surveillance of adverse events following immunisation is critical to ensure public safety and confidence in vaccines. This paper aims to describe the governance structure and data linkage methodology behind the establishment of the largest linked vaccine safety surveillance data resource in Australia – The Vaccine Safety Health Link (VSHL).
The Vaccine Safety Health Link contains linked records from the Australian Immunisation Register with records from hospital, perinatal, mortality, and notifiable disease datasets in near real-time. Linkage is done by the Centre for Victorian Data Linkage who receive the datasets in an identifiable format which then undergo standardisation, enrichment, linkage, quality assurance and de-identification, prior to being supplied for analysis.
The VSHL data resource allows sensitive and rapid analysis of a broad spectrum of suspected adverse events to ensure the safety of all vaccines administered. It is also used to refute spurious concerns where no associations are found, upholding trust, and maintaining vaccine confidence.
The Vaccine Safety Health Link's surveillance design complements existing vaccine safety surveillance methods. Challenges encountered and lessons learnt using Vaccine Safety Health Link would benefit linkage projects globally.
In its first two years, The Vaccine Safety Health Link has been used for 14 vaccine safety investigations. Studies into these conditions would not have otherwise been possible. The Vaccine Safety Health Link also partners with the Global Vaccine Data Network™ for approved collaborative studies with a combined population of over 300 million people.
The objective of this study was to determine regional variation in need for mental health care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults (18+ years).
Three Australian Indigenous health surveys were analysed, and prevalence rates of high/very high psychological distress (as per the Kessler-5 tool) by the Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage were computed and combined via meta-analysis. These estimates were applied to census population data to estimate regional needs and summed to geographic planning regions. Final estimates were assessed for face validity by comparing with other existing estimates of mental health need.
The Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage had a dose–response relationship with high/very high psychological distress, whereby the more disadvantaged an area, the greater the levels of reported distress. This methodology resulted in varying levels of need within South East Queensland.
The approach was found to have good face validity and provides a data-driven method to determine relative levels of need.
To ensure equity of mental health service provision, planners should account for variation in levels of need within a catchment. This method may be used throughout Australia to determine regional variation in need for care where other data are lacking to ensure evidence-based investment planning decisions at the local level.
The objective of this study was to develop Service, Research and Policy priorities to prevent the impact of family adversity on child mental health and determine comparative priorities of diverse stakeholders to those with lived experience of adversity.
Value-weighting approach conducted in a staged process: (i) professionals and experts with lived experience from health, education, justice and social care sectors attended a national symposium to identify priorities for family adversity and mental health and (ii) a subsequent resource allocation survey gathered views from participants and external experts on symposium priorities.
Consensus was reached on priorities. Service priorities included establishing intersectoral hubs for children and families and early childhood nurse home-visiting programs. Research priorities included scaling up evidence-based interventions and evaluating cross-sector, flexible funding models for services addressing childhood adversity. Policy priorities included developing evidence-based policies with evaluation and implementation plans and flexible funding models to support integrated care.
Our results provide detailed and actionable clarity on next steps to address family adversities.
The priorities call for a focus on cross-sectoral approaches to preventing or mitigating the effects of family adversity. The current Australian policy environment provides a timely opportunity to action the proposed interventions.