Blood Pressure最新文献

Hypertension diagnosis is one of the most common and important procedures in everyday clinical practice. Its applicability depends on correct and comparable measurements. Cuff-based measurement paradigms have dominated ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements for multiple decades. Cuffless and non-invasive methods may offer various advantages, such as a continuous and undisturbing measurement character. This review presents a conceptual overview of recent advances in the field of cuffless measurement paradigms and possible future developments which would enable cuffless beat-to-beat BP estimation paradigms to become clinically viable. It was refrained from a direct comparison between most studies and focussed on a conceptual merger of the ideas and conclusions presented in landmark scientific literature. There are two main approaches to cuffless beat-to-beat BP estimation represented in the scientific literature: First, models based on the physiological understanding of the cardiovascular system, mostly reliant on the pulse wave velocity combined with additional parameters. Second, models based on Deep Learning techniques, which have already shown great performance in various other medical fields. This review wants to present the advantages and limitations of each approach. Following this, the conceptional idea of unifying the benefits of physiological understanding and Deep Learning techniques for beat-to-beat BP estimation is presented. This could lead to a generalised and uniform solution for cuffless beat-to-beat BP estimations. This would not only make them an attractive clinical complement or even alternative to conventional cuff-based measurement paradigms but would substantially change how we think about BP as a fundamental marker of cardiovascular medicine.

Purpose: Subclinical chronic kidney disease is known to exacerbate hypertension and progression of kidney damage. In order to initiate timely interventions, early biomarkers for this vicious circle are needed. Our aim was to describe the cross-sectional associations of urinary orosomucoid and urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) with blood pressure and the longitudinal associations of urinary orosomucoid and NAG to hypertension after 7 years, and to compare the strength of these associations to the urinary albumin excretion (UAE).Material and methods: The Tromsø Study is a population-based, prospective study of inhabitants of the municipality of Tromsø, Northern Norway. Morning spot urine samples were collected on three consecutive days in the Tromsø 6 survey (2007-2008). We assessed the cross-sectional associations of urinary orosomucoid, NAG and UAE with blood pressure in Tromsø 6. In a cohort of participants attending Tromsø 6 and Tromsø 7 (2015-2016), we studied whether urinary biomarkers were longitudinally associated with hypertension.Results: A total of 7197 participants with a mean age of 63.5 years (SD 9.2), and a mean blood pressure of 141/78 mmHg (SD 23.0/10.6), were included in the study. Orosomucoid and UAE, but not NAG, was significantly associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in all the crude and multivariable cross-sectional analyses. Orosomucoid had consistently, although marginally, stronger associations with blood pressure. Incident hypertension at follow-up (Tromsø 7) was consistently significantly associated with urinary orosomucoid, but not urinary NAG or UAE. However, the standardized regression coefficients for orosomucoid were only marginally stronger than the standardized regression coefficients for ACR.Conclusion: In a cohort from the general population urine orosomucoid had a stronger cross-sectional association with blood pressure than UAE. After 7 years, urine orosomucoid showed the strongest association with incident hypertension. There were varying and weak associations between U-NAG, blood pressure and hypertension.

Purpose: To assess the opinion of Latin-American physicians on remote blood pressure monitoring and telehealth for hypertension management.

Material and methods: Cross-sectional survey of physicians residing in Latin-America. The study was conducted by the Mexico Hypertension Experts Group, Interamerican Society of Hypertension, Interamerican Society of Cardiology Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Prevention Council, and National Cardiologist Association of Mexico. An online survey composed of 40 questions using Google Forms was distributed from 7 December 2021, to 3 February 2022. The survey was approved by the GREHTA Ethics Committee and participation was voluntary and anonymous. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to identify the challenges of telehealth.

Results: 1753 physicians' responses were gathered. The responses came from physicians from different Latin-American countries, as follows: 24% from Mexico, 20.6% from Argentina, 14.7% from Colombia, 10.9% from Brazil, 8.7% from Venezuela, 8.2% from Guatemala and 3.2% from Paraguay. Responders with a high interest in carrying out their assistance task through remote telemonitoring reached 48.9% (821), while 43.6% are already currently conducting telemonitoring. A high number, 62%, claimed to need telemonitoring training. There is a direct relation between higher interest in telemonitoring and age, medical specialty, team working, residence in the biggest cities, expectations regarding telemedicine and reimbursement.

Conclusions: Remote monitoring is feasible in Latin-America. General practitioners and specialists from bigger cities seem eager and are self-perceived as well-trained and experienced. Facilities and resources do not seem to be a challenge but training reinforcement and telemedicine promotion is necessary for those physicians less motivated.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYWhat is the context?Hypertension is one of the leading worldwide modifiable risk factors for premature death. Strong evidence supports that effective treatment of this condition results in a significant reduction of hard outcomes.Only 20%-30% of hypertensive patients are within the blood pressure targets recommended by guidelines in Latin-America. There is an urgent need to implement innovative strategies to reverse this alarming health situation.What is new?Latin-American physicians were highly predisposed to telemonitoring practice. This high motivation was not influenced by hardware or software availability, technological knowledge or experience, by volume of monthly consultations, or by area (private-public) where the care activity is carried out.This high motivation may be supported by the conviction that this practice could be very useful as a complement to face-to-face assistance and a highly effective tool to improve adherence even though respondents considered that just 10% of the patients would prefer telemonito

Purpose: Existing technologies to measure central blood pressure (CBP) intrinsically depend on peripheral pressure or calibration models derived from it. Pharmacological or physiological interventions yielding different central and peripheral responses compromise the accuracy of such methods. We present a high-frame-rate ultrasound technology for cuffless and calibration-free evaluation of BP from the carotid artery. The system uses a pair of single-element ultrasound transducers to capture the arterial diameter and local pulse wave velocity (PWV) for the evaluation of beat-by-beat BP employing a novel biomechanical model.

Materials and methods: System's functionality assessment was conducted on eight male subjects (26 ± 4 years, normotensive and no history of cardiovascular risks) by perturbing pressure via short-term moderate lower body negative pressure (LBNP) intervention (-40 mmHg for 1 min). The ability of the system to capture dynamic responses of carotid pressure to LBNP was investigated and compared against the responses of peripheral pressure measured using a continuous BP monitor.

Results: While the carotid pressure manifested trends similar to finger measurements during LBNP, the system also captured the differential carotid-to-peripheral pressure response, which corroborates the literature. The carotid diastolic and mean pressures agreed with the finger pressures (limits-of-agreement within ±7 mmHg) and exhibited acceptable uncertainty (mean absolute errors were 2.4 ± 3.5 and 2.6 ± 4.0 mmHg, respectively). Concurrent to the literature, the carotid systolic and pulse pressures (PPs) were significantly lower than those of the finger pressures by 11.1 ± 9.4 and 11.3 ± 8.2 mmHg, respectively (p < .0001).

Conclusions: The study demonstrated the method's potential for providing cuffless and calibration-free pressure measurements while reliably capturing the physiological aspects, such as PP amplification and dynamic pressure responses to intervention.

Purpose: Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare disease, which is frequently misdiagnosed or its diagnosis can be missed. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of four-limb blood pressure (4LBP) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in patients with TA, which could be useful in disease detection.Materials and Methods: We consecutively enrolled 182 patients with TA at Fuwai Hospital between January 2013 and January 2016. Pulse pressure (PP), pulsatile index (PI), inter-arm systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference (IASBPD), inter-leg SBP difference (ILSBPD), ankle-brachial index (ABI), baPWV, and inter-side baPWV difference (ΔbaPWV) were analysed and compared with those of age-, sex-, and SBP-matched participants without cardiovascular diseases.Results: In the TA group, the diastolic blood pressure was lower (67.4 ± 23.7 vs 84.1 ± 15.0 mmHg), PP was larger (69.7 ± 23.6 vs 53.7 ± 10.6 mmHg), PI was higher (1.3 ± 2.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 mmHg), IASBPD was larger (18.2 ± 24.1 vs 4.2 ± 3.3 mmHg), and ILSBPD was larger (10.7 ± 15.0 vs 5.3 ± 4.1 mmHg) than those of the controls (all p < 0.01). Moreover, the proportions of PP >70 mmHg (36.8% vs 4.4%), PI > 1.0 (40.1% vs 2.2%), IASBPD >15 mmHg (34.6% vs. 0%), highest ABI >1.4 (17.6% vs. 0%), ILSBPD >15 mmHg (14.8% vs. 3.3%), lowest ABI < 0.9 (24.7% vs 2.2%), and ΔbaPWV > 185 cm/s (28.6% vs. 1.1%) were significantly greater in the TA group than in the control group (all p < 0.01). Approximately 80.8% of patients with TA (vs. 10.4% of controls) presented with at least one of these seven parameters (p = 0.000).Conclusion: The characteristics of 4LBP and baPWV in most patients with TA were abnormal, which helped us perform non-invasive primary screening and comprehensive evaluation of vascular lesions in such patients.

Purpose: Wake-up stroke constitutes up to 1/4 of all ischaemic strokes; however, its pathomechanisms remain largely unknown. Although low nocturnal blood flow may be the underlying cause, little is known about blood pressure (BP) characteristic of wake-up stroke patients. The aim of our study was to look for differences in BP variables between wake-up stroke and known-onset stroke patients and to seek BP indices which could distinguish wake-up stroke patients from other stroke patients.

Materials and methods: In the study, we included ischaemic stroke patients in whom office BP measurement and Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were recorded at day 7, after acute hypertensive response. The daytime period was defined as the interval from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. From ABPM, we obtained parameters of BP variability. Additionally, we calculated the BP percentage differences defined as (supine office BP-average daytime BP)/average daytime BP for systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure. We calculated analogous indices for night-time. The univariate and multivariate relationships between BP variables and wake-up stroke were analysed.

Results: Among the recruited 120 patients (aged 61.6 ± 12.3; 88 [73%] males; the baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale score 4 [3-8]), 36 (30%) had wake-up stroke. In a univariate analysis, the systolic and mean daytime and night-time BP differences were significantly lower in patients with wake-up stroke [(-1.92 (-11.55 to 3.95) vs 4.12 (-2.48 to 11.31), p = 0.006 and -6.20 (-12.32 to 7.42) vs 2.00 (-6.86 to 11.65), p = 0.029 for daytime, respectively; 0.00 (-9.79 to 11.82) vs 9.84 (0.00 to 18.25), p = 0.003 and 0.51 (-8.49 to 12.08) vs 7.82 (-2.47 to 20.39), p = 0.026, for night-time, respectively]. After adjustment for possible confounders, the systolic BP difference remained significantly associated with wake-up stroke (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-1.00, p = 0.039).

Conclusion: The subacute office-ambulatory BP difference including the dynamic (systolic BP), but not static BP component was independently associated with wake-up stroke.

Purpose. Randomised controlled trials have shown that renal denervation lowers office and ambulatory blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether patients undergoing renal denervation procedure in a real-life setting have a reduction in antihypertensive drug prescription over the subsequent years.Material and methods. Using the healthcare utilisation database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), the 136 patients who, during the period 2011-2016, were prescribed four or more antihypertensive drugs and underwent renal denervation were included in the study cohort. The number and type of antihypertensive drugs were assessed over the year before and during the three-year period after renal denervation.Results. The median age of the patients was 67 years and 68% of them were men. Based on a multisource comorbidity score, about 40% of patients showed a poor or very poor clinical status. Before renal denervation, the majority of the patients were prescribed four or five antihypertensive drugs. The number of drugs decreased after the denervation and reached 55% after three years. Over the same period, patients prescribed six drugs decreased from 18% to 2%. All antihypertensive drugs were less prescribed throughout the post denervation period. Compared to the year before the denervation, after three years prescription of diuretics was reduced by 15%, calcium channel blockers by 21%, ACE-inhibitors by 32%, angiotensin receptor blockers by 22%, beta-blockers by 20%, and alfa-blockers by 30%. Use of antihypertensive drugs exhibited a reduction also in an age, sex, and clinically matched control group with no renal denervation to an extent, however, much lower than in denervated patients (p-value = 0.013).Conclusion. In the real-life setting, patients who underwent renal denervation had a clearcut reduction in antihypertensive drug prescription over the following years.Plain Language SummaryPatients exhibited a reduction in the prescription of antihypertensive drugs during the three years that followed the denervation procedureThe decrease in the number of antihypertensive drugs was marked, started after a relatively short time (six months), and involved all drugs prescribed before the denervationThe number of hospitalisations for a cardiovascular event was similar before and after renal denervationAlbeit blood pressure values were not recorded in our database, all these findings taken together suggest the renal denervation procedure has a favourable influence on blood pressure control and is not associated with an increase in the risk of major cardiovascular complications.

Purpose: Education and feedback on hypertension management has been associated with improved hypertension control. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of such interventions to reduce the risk of stroke and cardiovascular events.

Materials and methods: Individuals ≥18 years with a blood pressure (BP) recording in Västerbotten or Södermanland County during the study period 2001 to 2009 were included in 108 serial cohort studies, each with 24 months follow-up. The primary outcome was risk of first-ever stroke in Västerbotten County (intervention) compared with Södermanland County (control). Secondary outcomes were first-ever major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), myocardial infarction, and heart failure, as well as all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. All outcomes were analysed using time-to-event data included in a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, systolic BP at inclusion, marital status, and disposable income.

Results: A total of 121 365 individuals (mean [SD] age at inclusion 61.7 [16.3] years; 59.9% female; mean inclusion BP 142.3/82.6 mmHg) in the intervention county were compared to 131 924 individuals (63.6 [16.2] years; 61.2% female; 144.1/81.1 mmHg) in the control county. A first-ever stroke occurred in 2 823 (2.3%) individuals in the intervention county, and 3 584 (2.7%) individuals in the control county (adjusted hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.03). No differences were observed for MACE, myocardial infarction or heart failure, whereas all-cause mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) were lower in the intervention county.

Conclusions: This study does not support an association between education and feedback on hypertension management to primary care physicians and the risk for stroke or cardiovascular outcomes. The observed differences for mortality outcomes should be interpreted with caution.

Purpose: Although 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (24-h ABPM) is the most important method to establish true hypertension, in clinical practice often repeated automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurements are used because of convenience and lower costs. We aimed to assess the agreement rate between a 30 and 60 min AOBP and 24-h ABPM.

Materials and methods: Patients with known hypertension (cohort 1) and patients visiting the neurology outpatient clinic after minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack (cohort 2) were selected. We performed AOBP for 30-60 min at 5-min intervals followed by 24-h ABPM and calculated average values of both measurements. Agreement between the two methods was studied with McNemar and Bland-Altman plots with a clinically relevant limit of agreement of ≤10 mm Hg difference in systolic BP.

Results: Our final cohort consisted of 135 patients from cohort 1 and 72 patients from cohort 2. We found relatively low agreement based on the clinical relevant cut-off value; 64.7% of the measurements were within the limits of agreement for 24-h systolic and 50.2% for 24-h diastolic. This was 61.4% for daytime systolic and 56.6% for daytime diastolic. In 73.5% of the patients, both methods led to the same diagnosis of either being hypertensive or non-hypertensive. This resulted in a significant difference between the methods to determine the diagnosis of hypertension (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: We conclude that 30-60 min AOBP measurements cannot replace a 24-h ABPM and propose to perform 24-h ABPM at least on a yearly basis to confirm AOBP measurements.