首页 > 最新文献

BMJ Open Quality最新文献

英文 中文
Russian experience in healthcare quality assurance through standards of care: 2014-2023. 俄罗斯通过护理标准保证医疗保健质量的经验:2014-2023年。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003843
Vasiliy Vlassov, Nino Gabuniya, Anna Vlasova

Objectives: The Russian Federation inherited from the USSR a vast and poor healthcare system. Since 1996, the move to evidence-guided care has been initiated. The objective is to describe the last 10 years' significant progress in the development of the centralised system of guidelines and quality assurance.

Methods: For the narrative review, we searched MEDLINE and the Central Medical Library, Moscow for reports relevant to the quality of healthcare and used our collections of the grey literature for the policy review. Neither patients nor the public were involved in the design and execution of this study.

Results: Legislation 2011 recognised clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as an important tool in developing evidence-based practice. On top of the system are regulations of a new type-orders of medical care-which prescribe the patients' track in the healthcare system, as well as the necessary staffing and equipment for participating organisations. CPGs describe the recommended interventions. Third, documents called 'standards' are derived from CPGs to calculate the average cost for costing diagnosis related groups and informing other payment decisions. At the same time, the Ministry of Health promotes the certification of medical organisations and introduces lean at the outpatient facilities. The criminal prosecution of physicians became more frequent, disturbing the profession.

Conclusions: A wide range of initiatives in quality assurance promise improvement in the quality of health care. Unfortunately, the insufficient and reduced funding, as well as solutions with unknown effectiveness, may limit prospects for improvement.

目标:俄罗斯联邦从苏联继承了庞大而贫穷的医疗保健系统。自1996年以来,已开始转向循证指导的护理。目标是描述过去10年在制定指导方针和质量保证的集中系统方面取得的重大进展。方法:对于叙述性综述,我们检索MEDLINE和莫斯科中央医学图书馆,查找与医疗保健质量相关的报告,并使用我们收集的灰色文献进行政策综述。患者和公众都没有参与这项研究的设计和实施。结果:2011年立法承认临床实践指南(cpg)是发展循证实践的重要工具。在这一系统之上是一种新型的医疗护理规则,它规定了病人在医疗保健系统中的轨迹,以及参与组织的必要人员和设备。CPGs描述了建议的干预措施。第三,称为“标准”的文件来自cpg,用于计算诊断相关群体的平均成本,并为其他支付决策提供信息。与此同时,卫生部促进医疗机构的认证,并在门诊设施引入精益。对医生的刑事起诉越来越频繁,这让这个行业感到不安。结论:质量保证方面的广泛举措有望改善医疗保健质量。不幸的是,资金不足和减少,以及效力不明的解决办法,可能限制改善的前景。
{"title":"Russian experience in healthcare quality assurance through standards of care: 2014-2023.","authors":"Vasiliy Vlassov, Nino Gabuniya, Anna Vlasova","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003843","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003843","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Russian Federation inherited from the USSR a vast and poor healthcare system. Since 1996, the move to evidence-guided care has been initiated. The objective is to describe the last 10 years' significant progress in the development of the centralised system of guidelines and quality assurance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the narrative review, we searched MEDLINE and the Central Medical Library, Moscow for reports relevant to the quality of healthcare and used our collections of the grey literature for the policy review. Neither patients nor the public were involved in the design and execution of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Legislation 2011 recognised clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as an important tool in developing evidence-based practice. On top of the system are regulations of a new type-orders of medical care-which prescribe the patients' track in the healthcare system, as well as the necessary staffing and equipment for participating organisations. CPGs describe the recommended interventions. Third, documents called 'standards' are derived from CPGs to calculate the average cost for costing diagnosis related groups and informing other payment decisions. At the same time, the Ministry of Health promotes the certification of medical organisations and introduces lean at the outpatient facilities. The criminal prosecution of physicians became more frequent, disturbing the profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A wide range of initiatives in quality assurance promise improvement in the quality of health care. Unfortunately, the insufficient and reduced funding, as well as solutions with unknown effectiveness, may limit prospects for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958980/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147316325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leading across boundaries: establishment of the UCLH community outreach intrathecal baclofen refill service. 跨界领导:建立UCLH社区外展鞘内巴氯芬补充服务。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003716
Elizabeth Keenan, Karen Ang, Heesook Lee, Nicola Betteridge, David Chal, Roisin O'Connell, Katrina Buchanan, Valerie Stevenson

Background: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a recognised treatment for severe spasticity. ITB users need to attend a specialist clinic regularly for their pump to be refilled and reprogrammed. Many patients travel significant distances and require hospital transport which is inconvenient, stressful and costly. These challenges inspired the University College London Hospitals (UCLH) spasticity team to explore establishing a community outreach clinic, staffed by the UCLH team, to provide care closer to home for this complex group.

Method: By mapping the patient cohort, using their general practitioner postcode, we identified patient clusters including those in the same long-term care facilities. In tandem, accessible healthcare locations within North Central London were identified and approached.

Results: The UCLH ITB outreach service was launched in December 2022. Over the next 15 months a total of six sites were established. In 2024, over a 12 month period, 28 outreach clinics were completed, with a total of 125 patients assessed and pumps refilled in the community. Transport and healthcare cost savings were realised, and patients reported positive, practical and emotional benefits.

Conclusion: This initiative improved patient care as well as creating a local strategy for joint working through forging new relationships and embracing shared learning.

背景:鞘内巴氯芬(ITB)是一种公认的治疗严重痉挛的药物。使用人需定期到专科诊所进行泵注液和重新编程。许多病人要走很远的路,需要去医院,这既不方便、压力又昂贵。这些挑战激发了伦敦大学学院医院(UCLH)痉挛团队探索建立一个社区外展诊所,由UCLH团队配备人员,为这个复杂的群体提供离家更近的护理。方法:通过绘制患者队列,使用他们的全科医生邮政编码,我们确定了患者群,包括那些在相同的长期护理设施。与此同时,确定并接触了伦敦中北部的无障碍医疗地点。结果:UCLH的外展服务于2022年12月启动。在以后的15个月里共设立了6个场址。2024年,在12个月的时间里,完成了28个外展诊所,总共评估了125名患者,并在社区重新填充了泵。节省了运输和医疗成本,患者报告了积极的、实际的和情感上的好处。结论:这一举措改善了患者护理,并通过建立新的关系和接受共享学习,为联合工作创造了一种当地战略。
{"title":"Leading across boundaries: establishment of the UCLH community outreach intrathecal baclofen refill service.","authors":"Elizabeth Keenan, Karen Ang, Heesook Lee, Nicola Betteridge, David Chal, Roisin O'Connell, Katrina Buchanan, Valerie Stevenson","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003716","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a recognised treatment for severe spasticity. ITB users need to attend a specialist clinic regularly for their pump to be refilled and reprogrammed. Many patients travel significant distances and require hospital transport which is inconvenient, stressful and costly. These challenges inspired the University College London Hospitals (UCLH) spasticity team to explore establishing a community outreach clinic, staffed by the UCLH team, to provide care closer to home for this complex group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>By mapping the patient cohort, using their general practitioner postcode, we identified patient clusters including those in the same long-term care facilities. In tandem, accessible healthcare locations within North Central London were identified and approached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UCLH ITB outreach service was launched in December 2022. Over the next 15 months a total of six sites were established. In 2024, over a 12 month period, 28 outreach clinics were completed, with a total of 125 patients assessed and pumps refilled in the community. Transport and healthcare cost savings were realised, and patients reported positive, practical and emotional benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This initiative improved patient care as well as creating a local strategy for joint working through forging new relationships and embracing shared learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147302220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive recommendations for the implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a narrative review on facilitators and barriers. 在医疗保健中实施人工智能的综合建议:关于促进因素和障碍的叙述性审查。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003639
Katharina Wenderott, Jim Krups, Matthias Weigl

Objectives: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into clinical practice holds significant promise for enhancing healthcare delivery, yet substantial barriers remain to their widespread adoption. This narrative review aimed, first, to identify key facilitators and barriers to the implementation of AI technologies in patient care, and, second, to introduce a comprehensive list of evidence-based recommendations for successful AI integration in healthcare organisations.

Design: We conducted a narrative review across four electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published within the last decade. Following the stepwise selection and review procedure, thematic content analysis was performed.

Sample: A total of 26 studies was included.

Results: We identified 55 dimensions of facilitators or barriers to AI implementation. These were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety work system model. Key dimensions included efficiency, compatibility with local IT infrastructure, stakeholder involvement, transparency and clinician trust. Drawing upon the 25 most frequently reported dimensions of facilitators and barriers, we developed a set of recommendations.

Conclusions: This review consolidates the current literature on implementation challenges of AI in everyday clinical care practice to offer insights for healthcare organisations and professionals to navigate the challenges of AI implementation. Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of the sociotechnical complexities surrounding AI adoption, and our compilation of recommendations can help to guide future efforts in leveraging AI to improve clinical workflows and patient care.

目标:将人工智能(AI)技术整合到临床实践中,对于加强医疗保健服务具有重要的前景,但其广泛采用仍存在实质性障碍。这篇叙述性综述的目的是,首先,确定人工智能技术在患者护理中实施的关键促进因素和障碍,其次,介绍一份全面的基于证据的建议清单,以成功地将人工智能整合到医疗机构中。设计:我们对四个电子数据库进行了叙述性回顾,以确定在过去十年中发表的同行评议研究。按照逐步选择和审查程序,进行主题内容分析。样本:共纳入26项研究。结果:我们确定了人工智能实施的55个促进因素或障碍。这些是根据病人安全工作系统模型的系统工程倡议进行分类的。关键方面包括效率、与当地IT基础设施的兼容性、利益相关者的参与、透明度和临床医生的信任。根据最常报告的25个促进因素和障碍方面,我们制定了一套建议。结论:本综述整合了当前关于人工智能在日常临床护理实践中实施挑战的文献,为医疗机构和专业人员提供见解,以应对人工智能实施的挑战。我们的研究结果提供了围绕人工智能采用的社会技术复杂性的全面概述,我们的建议汇编可以帮助指导未来利用人工智能改善临床工作流程和患者护理的工作。
{"title":"Comprehensive recommendations for the implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a narrative review on facilitators and barriers.","authors":"Katharina Wenderott, Jim Krups, Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003639","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into clinical practice holds significant promise for enhancing healthcare delivery, yet substantial barriers remain to their widespread adoption. This narrative review aimed, first, to identify key facilitators and barriers to the implementation of AI technologies in patient care, and, second, to introduce a comprehensive list of evidence-based recommendations for successful AI integration in healthcare organisations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a narrative review across four electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published within the last decade. Following the stepwise selection and review procedure, thematic content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>A total of 26 studies was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 55 dimensions of facilitators or barriers to AI implementation. These were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety work system model. Key dimensions included efficiency, compatibility with local IT infrastructure, stakeholder involvement, transparency and clinician trust. Drawing upon the 25 most frequently reported dimensions of facilitators and barriers, we developed a set of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review consolidates the current literature on implementation challenges of AI in everyday clinical care practice to offer insights for healthcare organisations and professionals to navigate the challenges of AI implementation. Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of the sociotechnical complexities surrounding AI adoption, and our compilation of recommendations can help to guide future efforts in leveraging AI to improve clinical workflows and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147302263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing wait times for hospital-based outpatient mental healthcare: what works? 减少医院门诊心理保健的等待时间:什么有效?
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003031
Heather Oneschuk, Amanda Tuckerman, Carly Archer, Kamini Vasudev

Background: Our hospital is an urban academic multisite facility in Southwestern Ontario. The General Adult Ambulatory Mental Health Service (GAAMHS) delivers acute urgent and non-urgent outpatient (O-P) psychiatric care for adults 18 to 64 years. In the context of sub-optimal physician resources and the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an accumulation of 812 non-urgent referrals in March 2021. Manual review of the number of incoming referrals and processing timelines estimated a wait time of 9 to 12 months to see a psychiatrist. This quality improvement project was conducted to resolve the backlog of referrals and to reduce the wait times for the incoming non-urgent referrals.

Methods: This project was developed and implemented by the core team of a programme manager, an administrative assistant (AA) and a psychiatrist. It was achieved without any additional funding for project management. Process mapping of various components of GAAMHS was completed and an Ishikawa diagram was created to identify factors contributing to the backlog. Quality improvement change ideas were proposed and tested using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The interventions included reassessment of patient needs, implementation of an electronic data capture tool and team-based model of care, refining the referral triage process and standardising the service delivery practices of psychiatrists.

Results: The 812 backlogged referrals were resolved in a median of 5.3 months. The average number of new consultations and total O-P visits per full-time psychiatrist per month was 10.3 ±3.6 and 74.5±15.9, respectively, in 2020; it increased to 17.1±7.9 and 80.8±21.6 in 2022 and 18.8±8.9 and 90.0±20.2 in 2023. The wait times for the new incoming referrals have continued to decrease with the median wait times in December 2023 being 102 days and the wait times for the 75th percentile being 145 days.

Conclusion: A combination of strategies helped resolve the backlog and reduce wait times to access acute O-P mental health.

背景:我们的医院是安大略省西南部的一个城市学术多站点设施。普通成人门诊精神卫生服务(GAAMHS)为18至64岁的成年人提供急性紧急和非紧急门诊(O-P)精神病学护理。在医师资源次优和2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,2021年3月累计非紧急转诊812例。人工审查了传入的转诊数量和处理时间表,估计要等待9至12个月才能见到精神科医生。进行这一质量改进项目是为了解决积压的转介问题,并减少等待非紧急转介的时间。方法:本项目由一名项目经理、一名行政助理和一名精神科医生组成的核心团队制定和实施。这是在没有为项目管理提供任何额外资金的情况下实现的。完成了GAAMHS各个组件的过程映射,并创建了Ishikawa图,以确定导致积压的因素。采用计划-执行-研究-行动循环提出和测试质量改进变更的想法。干预措施包括重新评估患者需求,实施电子数据采集工具和以团队为基础的护理模式,改进转诊分诊过程,并使精神科医生的服务提供实践标准化。结果:812例积压的转诊在5.3个月的中位时间内得到解决。2020年,每位专职精神科医生每月平均新诊数为10.3±3.6次,总门诊次数为74.5±15.9次;2022年为17.1±7.9和80.8±21.6,2023年为18.8±8.9和90.0±20.2。新转介的等待时间继续减少,2023年12月的等待时间中位数为102天,第75百分位数的等待时间为145天。结论:多种策略的结合有助于解决积压问题,减少急诊O-P心理健康服务的等待时间。
{"title":"Reducing wait times for hospital-based outpatient mental healthcare: what works?","authors":"Heather Oneschuk, Amanda Tuckerman, Carly Archer, Kamini Vasudev","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003031","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our hospital is an urban academic multisite facility in Southwestern Ontario. The General Adult Ambulatory Mental Health Service (GAAMHS) delivers acute urgent and non-urgent outpatient (O-P) psychiatric care for adults 18 to 64 years. In the context of sub-optimal physician resources and the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an accumulation of 812 non-urgent referrals in March 2021. Manual review of the number of incoming referrals and processing timelines estimated a wait time of 9 to 12 months to see a psychiatrist. This quality improvement project was conducted to resolve the backlog of referrals and to reduce the wait times for the incoming non-urgent referrals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was developed and implemented by the core team of a programme manager, an administrative assistant (AA) and a psychiatrist. It was achieved without any additional funding for project management. Process mapping of various components of GAAMHS was completed and an Ishikawa diagram was created to identify factors contributing to the backlog. Quality improvement change ideas were proposed and tested using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The interventions included reassessment of patient needs, implementation of an electronic data capture tool and team-based model of care, refining the referral triage process and standardising the service delivery practices of psychiatrists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 812 backlogged referrals were resolved in a median of 5.3 months. The average number of new consultations and total O-P visits per full-time psychiatrist per month was 10.3 ±3.6 and 74.5±15.9, respectively, in 2020; it increased to 17.1±7.9 and 80.8±21.6 in 2022 and 18.8±8.9 and 90.0±20.2 in 2023. The wait times for the new incoming referrals have continued to decrease with the median wait times in December 2023 being 102 days and the wait times for the 75th percentile being 145 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of strategies helped resolve the backlog and reduce wait times to access acute O-P mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959053/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147302256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Where is the patient in the records? Evaluating physiotherapists' first visit in occupational health primary care pathway for low back pain. 病人的记录在哪里?评估物理治疗师在职业卫生初级保健途径对腰痛的首次访问。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003900
Maija Paukkunen, Birgitta Öberg, Jaro Karppinen, Leena Ala-Mursula, Katja Ryynänen, Riikka Holopainen, Allan Abbott

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach to low back pain (LBP) management, with physiotherapists playing a key role in occupational health primary care (OHPC). However, little is known about how their clinical behaviours at the first visit align with guideline-oriented biopsychosocial principles. Therefore, we evaluated LBP management quality in OHPC by applying predefined criteria to physiotherapists' documentation.

Methods: Based on a cluster-randomised implementation study data (ISRCTN11875357) we analysed 98 electronic patient records (EPRs) documented by 28 physiotherapists across diverse OHPC units. The intervention arm had received 3-7 days of biopsychosocial training. A stratified random sample of EPRs from individuals with LBP was reviewed using a structured researcher's evaluation tool. Each item was scored dichotomously (yes/no) and evaluated against predefined quality criteria with stepwise thresholds for different work disability risk groups.

Results: Step I, multidimensional biopsychosocial assessment of LBP, was documented in fewer than half of the records (36.5% in the intervention vs 16.7% in the control arm, p=0.081). The biological dimension was well documented in both arms (100% vs 95.8%, p=0.245), while psychological (58.1% vs 25%, p=0.009) and social (54.1% vs 29.2%, p=0.038) dimensions were more frequently documented in the intervention arm.Step II quality criteria (low-risk patients) were met in 58.1% of intervention versus 4.2% of control records (p<0.001), and step III (medium-risk) in 55.4% versus 4.2% (p<0.001). No EPRs met step IV (high-risk) quality criteria.The intervention arm more often documented psychosocial assessments, risk stratification, behavioural strategies and advice to stay active. Person-centredness (ie, goals, values, resources, expectations) was rarely documented (36.5% vs 0%, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial approach was associated with more frequent documentation of behaviours aligned with high-quality LBP management. However, overall quality varied, and person-centred aspects remained underreported. Complementary implementation strategies are required to ensure consistent delivery and documentation of biopsychosocial clinical practice in OHPC.

背景:临床指南推荐采用生物心理社会方法治疗腰痛,物理治疗师在职业卫生初级保健(OHPC)中发挥关键作用。然而,很少知道他们的临床行为如何在第一次访问符合指导导向的生物心理社会原则。因此,我们通过对物理治疗师的文件应用预定义的标准来评估OHPC的LBP管理质量。方法:基于一项集群随机实施研究数据(ISRCTN11875357),我们分析了来自不同OHPC单位的28名物理治疗师记录的98份电子病历(epr)。干预组接受了3-7天的生物心理社会训练。使用结构化研究人员的评估工具对LBP患者epr的分层随机样本进行了审查。每个项目都进行了二分评分(是/否),并根据预定义的质量标准对不同的工作残疾风险群体进行了逐步阈值评估。结果:第一步,LBP的多维生物心理社会评估,记录在不到一半的记录中(干预组36.5% vs对照组16.7%,p=0.081)。生物维度在两组中都有很好的记录(100%对95.8%,p=0.245),而心理维度(58.1%对25%,p=0.009)和社会维度(54.1%对29.2%,p=0.038)在干预组中更常被记录。58.1%的干预患者达到了第二步质量标准(低风险患者),对照记录为4.2%(结论:以指南为导向的生物心理社会方法的培训与更频繁的行为记录与高质量的LBP管理相一致)。然而,总体质量参差不齐,以人为本的方面仍未得到充分报道。需要补充实施战略,以确保OHPC的生物心理社会临床实践的一致交付和记录。
{"title":"Where is the patient in the records? Evaluating physiotherapists' first visit in occupational health primary care pathway for low back pain.","authors":"Maija Paukkunen, Birgitta Öberg, Jaro Karppinen, Leena Ala-Mursula, Katja Ryynänen, Riikka Holopainen, Allan Abbott","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003900","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach to low back pain (LBP) management, with physiotherapists playing a key role in occupational health primary care (OHPC). However, little is known about how their clinical behaviours at the first visit align with guideline-oriented biopsychosocial principles. Therefore, we evaluated LBP management quality in OHPC by applying predefined criteria to physiotherapists' documentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a cluster-randomised implementation study data (ISRCTN11875357) we analysed 98 electronic patient records (EPRs) documented by 28 physiotherapists across diverse OHPC units. The intervention arm had received 3-7 days of biopsychosocial training. A stratified random sample of EPRs from individuals with LBP was reviewed using a structured researcher's evaluation tool. Each item was scored dichotomously (yes/no) and evaluated against predefined quality criteria with stepwise thresholds for different work disability risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Step I, multidimensional biopsychosocial assessment of LBP, was documented in fewer than half of the records (36.5% in the intervention vs 16.7% in the control arm, p=0.081). The biological dimension was well documented in both arms (100% vs 95.8%, p=0.245), while psychological (58.1% vs 25%, p=0.009) and social (54.1% vs 29.2%, p=0.038) dimensions were more frequently documented in the intervention arm.Step II quality criteria (low-risk patients) were met in 58.1% of intervention versus 4.2% of control records (p<0.001), and step III (medium-risk) in 55.4% versus 4.2% (p<0.001). No EPRs met step IV (high-risk) quality criteria.The intervention arm more often documented psychosocial assessments, risk stratification, behavioural strategies and advice to stay active. Person-centredness (ie, goals, values, resources, expectations) was rarely documented (36.5% vs 0%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial approach was associated with more frequent documentation of behaviours aligned with high-quality LBP management. However, overall quality varied, and person-centred aspects remained underreported. Complementary implementation strategies are required to ensure consistent delivery and documentation of biopsychosocial clinical practice in OHPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959044/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147302233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rapid response teams for new leaders: a narrative review of global evidence and implementation strategies with a focus on Japan. 新领导人快速反应小组:以日本为重点的全球证据和实施战略的叙述性审查。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-23 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003949
Akiko Ogawa, Yoko Tsuchiya, Ikue Sakemi, Nobuo Kutsuna

Background: Rapid response systems (RRSs) are designed to detect and treat physiological deterioration before cardiac arrest occurs. Since 2020, Japan has seen a rapid increase in RRS adoption; however, most new team members have not received formal training in critical care. This review synthesises international and Japanese evidence supporting implementation and training for new members.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Ichushi Web were searched for English or Japanese studies evaluating adult RRSs (January 2010-April 2025). We included 47 records (43 comparative and 4 systematic reviews); the national guideline was not included.

Results: Mature RRSs were associated with a 35% relative reduction in unexpected in-hospital cardiac arrests and a 12% decrease in all-cause hospital mortality. However, the evidence is not uniformly positive-systematic reviews and multicentre analyses reported no significant mortality benefit-and outcome heterogeneity limits comparability. Effective programmes share three key features: (1) single-parameter activation criteria augmented by early-warning scores; (2) tiered response models for advanced practice nurses and (3) audit-feedback cycles with dashboards. Crew resource management, in situ simulation and mindfulness-based self-leadership approaches may be associated with reduced decision latency. Emerging tools like deep-learning prediction algorithms, continuous wearable monitoring and tele-support systems may expand coverage but require governance. Common barriers include limited night-time staffing, cultural reluctance to escalate care and medicolegal ambiguity; targeted education and registry-driven feedback mitigate challenges.

Conclusions: Well-structured RRSs improve outcomes beyond traditional code-blue models. Aligning activation thresholds, multidisciplinary competencies and data-driven quality improvement cycles with local resources may help new Japanese rapid response team members develop resilient, high-performing services.

背景:快速反应系统(RRSs)被设计用于在心脏骤停发生前检测和治疗生理恶化。自 2020年以来,日本的RRS采用率迅速增长;然而,大多数新成员没有接受过重症监护方面的正式培训。该审查综合了支持新成员实施和培训的国际和日本证据。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science和Ichushi Web中评价成人RRSs的英文或日文研究(January - 2010-April 2025)。我们纳入了47条记录(43条比较评价和4条系统评价);国家指南不包括在内。结果:成熟的rrs与院内意外心脏骤停相对降低35%和全因医院死亡率降低12%相关。然而,证据并不一致,系统评价和多中心分析报告没有显著的死亡率益处,结果异质性限制了可比性。有效的计划有三个关键特征:(1)单参数激活标准由预警分数增强;(2)高级执业护士的分层响应模型和(3)带有仪表板的审计反馈周期。机组人员资源管理、现场模拟和基于正念的自我领导方法可能与减少决策延迟有关。深度学习预测算法、连续可穿戴监控和远程支持系统等新兴工具可能会扩大覆盖范围,但需要治理。常见的障碍包括夜间工作人员有限、文化上不愿升级护理以及医学法律上的模糊性;有针对性的教育和注册驱动的反馈减轻了挑战。结论:结构良好的rrs比传统的蓝色代码模型改善了结果。将激活阈值、多学科能力和数据驱动的质量改进周期与当地资源相结合,可能有助于日本快速反应团队的新成员开发出有弹性、高性能的服务。
{"title":"Rapid response teams for new leaders: a narrative review of global evidence and implementation strategies with a focus on Japan.","authors":"Akiko Ogawa, Yoko Tsuchiya, Ikue Sakemi, Nobuo Kutsuna","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003949","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid response systems (RRSs) are designed to detect and treat physiological deterioration before cardiac arrest occurs. Since 2020, Japan has seen a rapid increase in RRS adoption; however, most new team members have not received formal training in critical care. This review synthesises international and Japanese evidence supporting implementation and training for new members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science and Ichushi Web were searched for English or Japanese studies evaluating adult RRSs (January 2010-April 2025). We included 47 records (43 comparative and 4 systematic reviews); the national guideline was not included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mature RRSs were associated with a 35% relative reduction in unexpected in-hospital cardiac arrests and a 12% decrease in all-cause hospital mortality. However, the evidence is not uniformly positive-systematic reviews and multicentre analyses reported no significant mortality benefit-and outcome heterogeneity limits comparability. Effective programmes share three key features: (1) single-parameter activation criteria augmented by early-warning scores; (2) tiered response models for advanced practice nurses and (3) audit-feedback cycles with dashboards. Crew resource management, in situ simulation and mindfulness-based self-leadership approaches may be associated with reduced decision latency. Emerging tools like deep-learning prediction algorithms, continuous wearable monitoring and tele-support systems may expand coverage but require governance. Common barriers include limited night-time staffing, cultural reluctance to escalate care and medicolegal ambiguity; targeted education and registry-driven feedback mitigate challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Well-structured RRSs improve outcomes beyond traditional code-blue models. Aligning activation thresholds, multidisciplinary competencies and data-driven quality improvement cycles with local resources may help new Japanese rapid response team members develop resilient, high-performing services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12931532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hospital standardised mortality ratio: a novel method and approach to risk adjustment. 医院标准化死亡率:风险调整的新方法和新途径。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003777
Graeme J Duke, Steven Hirth, John D Santamaria, Adina Hamilton, Melisa Lau, Zhuoyang Li, Teresa Le, Dasamal T Fernando

Background: Hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) is a simple ratio that is plagued by sparsity, dimensionality, overdispersion, exclusions and controversy.

Objective: Describe Hospital Outcome Prediction Equation V.7 (HOPE-7) methodology.

Setting: State of Victoria (Australia), population 6.8 million.

Methods: Multiphase process: (a) principal diagnoses aggregated into 406 clinical diagnosis groups (CDGs); (b) low case fatality rate (CFR<0.02%) CDGs set aside; (c) remaining CDGs ranked according to predicted risk; (d) final generalised linear model fitted to (75%) training dataset; (e) low-risk cases reinserted and allocated zero risk; (e) model performance in validation dataset assessed for calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (H10), Brier score, calibration plot), discrimination (area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUCROC) and area under the precision recall (AUCPRC) curves) and classification (dispersion value (φ), SD random effect (τ)). Ideal model: Brier score~0, H10 p value>0.05, AUCROC>0.80, AUCPRC>0.30, φ~1 and τ~0. Classification assessed by proportion of outlier CFR reclassified as inlier HSMR.

Results: 315 hospitals treated 12.97 million adult separations and 152 (48.3%) reported 63 806 in-hospital deaths, 0.49 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.50) per 100 separations. 10 722 principal diagnoses allocated to 198 non-significant CDGs, 45 low-risk CDGs (5.05 million cases) assigned zero risk and 163 significant CDGs aggregated to 20 risk ranks. Final model (development cohort 9.73 million) included demographic variables (age, birth sex, emergency, aged-care resident, hospital transfer, relationship status), one interaction term (emergency transfer) and 20 diagnosis-risk categories. Validation metrics (cohort 3.24 million): Brier score 0.015; H10 p value 0.09; AUCROC 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.92); AUCPRC 0.28 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.31); φ=4.31 and τ=0.24. Study hospitals generated 2192 hospital quarters with 2053 (95.7%) outlier CFR values, of which 1975 (96.2%) reclassified as HSMR inliers.

Conclusions: HOPE-7 is a parsimonious and pragmatic HSMR model based on administrative data common to many jurisdictions that displayed satisfactory calibration, classification and discrimination metrics and addressed frequent HSMR limitations.

背景:医院标准化死亡率(HSMR)是一个简单的比率,存在稀疏性、维度性、过度分散性、排除性和争议。目的:描述医院预后预测方程V.7 (HOPE-7)方法。环境:维多利亚州(澳大利亚),人口680万。方法:采用多阶段流程(a)将主要诊断汇总为406个临床诊断组(cdg);(b)低病死率(CFR10)、Brier评分、校准图)、鉴别(receiver operator characteristic (AUCROC)和precision recall (AUCPRC)曲线下面积)和分类(dispersion value (φ)、SD random effect (τ))。理想模型:Brier评分~0,h10p值>.05,AUCROC>0.80, AUCPRC>0.30, φ~1, τ~0。通过将异常CFR重新分类为早期HSMR的比例来评估分类。结果:315家医院治疗了1297万例成人分离,152家(48.3%)报告了63 806例院内死亡,每100例分离0.49例(95%可信区间0.48至0.50)。10722个主要诊断被分配给198个不显著cdg, 45个低风险cdg(505万例)被分配为零风险,163个显著cdg被分配给20个风险等级。最终模型(发展队列973万)包括人口统计变量(年龄、出生性别、急诊、老年护理住院患者、医院转院、关系状况)、一个交互项(急诊转院)和20个诊断风险类别。验证指标(324万队列):Brier评分0.015;H10 p值0.09;AUCROC 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 ~ 0.92);AUCPRC 0.28 (95% CI 0.25 ~ 0.31);φ=4.31, τ=0.24。研究医院共产生2192个医院小区,其中2053个(95.7%)异常CFR值,其中1975个(96.2%)被重新归类为HSMR内值。结论:HOPE-7是一个简洁实用的HSMR模型,它基于许多司法管辖区常见的行政数据,显示出令人满意的校准、分类和区分指标,并解决了常见的HSMR局限性。
{"title":"Hospital standardised mortality ratio: a novel method and approach to risk adjustment.","authors":"Graeme J Duke, Steven Hirth, John D Santamaria, Adina Hamilton, Melisa Lau, Zhuoyang Li, Teresa Le, Dasamal T Fernando","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003777","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) is a simple ratio that is plagued by sparsity, dimensionality, overdispersion, exclusions and controversy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe Hospital Outcome Prediction Equation V.7 (HOPE-7) methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>State of Victoria (Australia), population 6.8 million.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiphase process: (a) principal diagnoses aggregated into 406 clinical diagnosis groups (CDGs); (b) low case fatality rate (CFR<0.02%) CDGs set aside; (c) remaining CDGs ranked according to predicted risk; (d) final generalised linear model fitted to (75%) training dataset; (e) low-risk cases reinserted and allocated zero risk; (e) model performance in validation dataset assessed for calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (H<sub>10</sub>), Brier score, calibration plot), discrimination (area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUCROC) and area under the precision recall (AUCPRC) curves) and classification (dispersion value (φ), SD random effect (τ)). Ideal model: Brier score~0, H<sub>10</sub> p value>0.05, AUCROC>0.80, AUCPRC>0.30, φ~1 and τ~0. Classification assessed by proportion of outlier CFR reclassified as inlier HSMR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>315 hospitals treated 12.97 million adult separations and 152 (48.3%) reported 63 806 in-hospital deaths, 0.49 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.50) per 100 separations. 10 722 principal diagnoses allocated to 198 non-significant CDGs, 45 low-risk CDGs (5.05 million cases) assigned zero risk and 163 significant CDGs aggregated to 20 risk ranks. Final model (development cohort 9.73 million) included demographic variables (age, birth sex, emergency, aged-care resident, hospital transfer, relationship status), one interaction term (emergency transfer) and 20 diagnosis-risk categories. Validation metrics (cohort 3.24 million): Brier score 0.015; H<sub>10</sub> p value 0.09; AUCROC 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.92); AUCPRC 0.28 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.31); φ=4.31 and τ=0.24. Study hospitals generated 2192 hospital quarters with 2053 (95.7%) outlier CFR values, of which 1975 (96.2%) reclassified as HSMR inliers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HOPE-7 is a parsimonious and pragmatic HSMR model based on administrative data common to many jurisdictions that displayed satisfactory calibration, classification and discrimination metrics and addressed frequent HSMR limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927321/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving social needs screening in general paediatrics through project SEEK. 通过SEEK项目改善普通儿科的社会需求筛查。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003630
Colby Feeney, Bryan Monroe, Chisom Agbim, Sameer Kamath, Victoria Parente

Unmet social needs in paediatric patients contribute to poor health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. In order to identify unmet social needs, we aimed to improve social determinant of health (SDoH) screening of children admitted to the general paediatrics teams at our institution. Between September 2021 and September 2024, we conducted a quality improvement project by a multidisciplinary stakeholder team to improve identification of unmet social needs at our institution. We set two aims: (1) develop a screening process acceptable to families and (2) increase the percentage of children admitted to general paediatrics with SDoH screening documented across four domains, including food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing insecurity and financial strain from 0% to 60%. During the project period, 4229 patients were eligible for screening. Screening was found to be acceptable by a pilot group of patients and their families (n=22). Rates of screening improved from 0% to 56.7% after various interventions, including nursing education and feedback, providing meal trays from the cafeteria to families in need, and integration of the screening questionnaire into the electronic health record. Food insecurity screening positively correlated with SDoH screening across all four domains. This multidisciplinary quality improvement project implemented SDoH screening on general paediatrics which was found acceptable by patients, and rates of screening improved by addressing identified needs. Tangible resources, such as providing meal trays during the hospitalisation, were a unique aspect of this project that helped families and alleviated distress of the screeners.

儿科患者未满足的社会需求导致健康状况不佳和医疗保健利用率增加。为了确定未满足的社会需求,我们的目标是改善我们机构普通儿科小组收治儿童的社会健康决定因素(SDoH)筛查。在2021年9月至2024年9月期间,我们由一个多学科利益相关者团队进行了一个质量改进项目,以改进对我们机构未满足的社会需求的识别。我们设定了两个目标:(1)制定一个家庭可接受的筛查流程;(2)将在四个领域(包括食品不安全、交通障碍、住房不安全和经济压力)记录SDoH筛查的儿童在普通儿科的比例从0%提高到60%。在项目期间,有4229例患者符合筛查条件。一个由患者及其家属组成的试验组(n=22)发现筛查是可以接受的。经过各种干预措施,包括护理教育和反馈、从自助餐厅向有需要的家庭提供餐盘以及将筛查问卷纳入电子健康记录,筛查率从0%提高到56.7%。在所有四个领域中,粮食不安全筛查与SDoH筛查呈正相关。这一多学科质量改进项目对普通儿科实施了SDoH筛查,患者认为这是可以接受的,通过解决确定的需求,筛查率得到了提高。有形资源,例如在住院期间提供餐盘,是该项目的一个独特方面,它帮助了家庭并减轻了筛查人员的痛苦。
{"title":"Improving social needs screening in general paediatrics through project SEEK.","authors":"Colby Feeney, Bryan Monroe, Chisom Agbim, Sameer Kamath, Victoria Parente","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003630","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003630","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unmet social needs in paediatric patients contribute to poor health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. In order to identify unmet social needs, we aimed to improve social determinant of health (SDoH) screening of children admitted to the general paediatrics teams at our institution. Between September 2021 and September 2024, we conducted a quality improvement project by a multidisciplinary stakeholder team to improve identification of unmet social needs at our institution. We set two aims: (1) develop a screening process acceptable to families and (2) increase the percentage of children admitted to general paediatrics with SDoH screening documented across four domains, including food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing insecurity and financial strain from 0% to 60%. During the project period, 4229 patients were eligible for screening. Screening was found to be acceptable by a pilot group of patients and their families (n=22). Rates of screening improved from 0% to 56.7% after various interventions, including nursing education and feedback, providing meal trays from the cafeteria to families in need, and integration of the screening questionnaire into the electronic health record. Food insecurity screening positively correlated with SDoH screening across all four domains. This multidisciplinary quality improvement project implemented SDoH screening on general paediatrics which was found acceptable by patients, and rates of screening improved by addressing identified needs. Tangible resources, such as providing meal trays during the hospitalisation, were a unique aspect of this project that helped families and alleviated distress of the screeners.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12918692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best possible medication history interview guide: a rapid scoping review. 最好的用药史访谈指南:快速评估范围。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-15 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004015
Joanne Man-Wai Ho, Jennifer M Tung, Alice Watt, Tony Antoniou, Danielle Yantha, Carolyn Hoffman, David Golding, Sylvia Hyland, Camille Dulong, Sophiya Benjamin

Background: Adverse drug events are a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) is a systematic compilation of a patient's medications derived using at least two sources of information including a patient interview. We sought to update the BPMH interview guide developed by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Canada to reflect the evolving healthcare landscape.

Objectives: We conducted a rapid scoping review to develop questions and a standardised procedure for completing a BPMH, and to understand patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional preferences or perceptions regarding the BPMH interview.

Methods: We searched Medline, the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Practice Database, the Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews database, and grey literature. We included peer-reviewed quantitative literature (randomised/non-randomised controlled trials, observational studies), qualitative studies, systematic reviews, and grey literature (including guidelines, quality improvement initiatives, patient experiences, health technology assessments). Following pilot testing to ensure inter-rater reliability, articles were screened and data extracted in duplicate using the Covidence platform. INPLASY registration protocol INPLASY2024110033.

Results: Our search identified 5424 records, and after removing duplicates and screening, we extracted data from 95 articles. Identified studies provided additional questions and procedural steps for assessing adherence, use of non-prescription medications and substances (eg, alcohol, smoking, cannabis, recreational use), and integration of virtual care into the BPMH guide. Perceived facilitators and barriers to conducting a BPMH included clinical leadership support for trained healthcare professionals to perform a BPMH, virtual care, access to technology, and intact hearing for patients or interviewed caregivers.

Conclusions: This review identified additional questions and approaches for updating the ISMP Canada BPMH interview guide. Additional feedback from users of the existing interview guide, and patients and caregivers who have participated in a BPMH interview should be integrated through codesign into the new updated ISMP Canada BPMH guide.

Trial registration number: INPLASY2024110033.

背景:药物不良事件是发病率、死亡率和医疗费用的重要原因。最佳可能用药史(BPMH)是对患者用药的系统汇编,至少使用两种信息来源,包括患者访谈。我们试图更新由加拿大安全用药实践研究所(ISMP)制定的BPMH访谈指南,以反映不断发展的医疗保健前景。目的:我们进行了一项快速范围审查,以制定完成BPMH的问题和标准化程序,并了解患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员对BPMH访谈的偏好或看法。方法:我们检索Medline、Joanna Briggs研究所循证实践数据库、循证医学评论数据库和灰色文献。我们纳入了同行评议的定量文献(随机/非随机对照试验、观察性研究)、定性研究、系统评价和灰色文献(包括指南、质量改进举措、患者体验、卫生技术评估)。在进行了试点测试以确保评分者之间的可靠性之后,使用covid - ence平台对文章进行了筛选,并提取了两份数据。INPLASY注册协议INPLASY2024110033。结果:我们的检索确定了5424条记录,在删除重复和筛选后,我们从95篇文章中提取了数据。已确定的研究为评估依从性、非处方药和物质的使用(如酒精、吸烟、大麻、娱乐性使用)以及将虚拟护理纳入BPMH指南提供了额外的问题和程序步骤。实施BPMH的促进因素和障碍包括临床领导对训练有素的医疗保健专业人员进行BPMH的支持、虚拟护理、获取技术以及患者或接受采访的护理人员的完整听力。结论:本综述确定了更新ISMP加拿大BPMH访谈指南的其他问题和方法。来自现有访谈指南的用户以及参与BPMH访谈的患者和护理人员的其他反馈应通过共同设计整合到新更新的ISMP加拿大BPMH指南中。试验注册号:INPLASY2024110033。
{"title":"Best possible medication history interview guide: a rapid scoping review.","authors":"Joanne Man-Wai Ho, Jennifer M Tung, Alice Watt, Tony Antoniou, Danielle Yantha, Carolyn Hoffman, David Golding, Sylvia Hyland, Camille Dulong, Sophiya Benjamin","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004015","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug events are a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) is a systematic compilation of a patient's medications derived using at least two sources of information including a patient interview. We sought to update the BPMH interview guide developed by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Canada to reflect the evolving healthcare landscape.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a rapid scoping review to develop questions and a standardised procedure for completing a BPMH, and to understand patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional preferences or perceptions regarding the BPMH interview.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Practice Database, the Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews database, and grey literature. We included peer-reviewed quantitative literature (randomised/non-randomised controlled trials, observational studies), qualitative studies, systematic reviews, and grey literature (including guidelines, quality improvement initiatives, patient experiences, health technology assessments). Following pilot testing to ensure inter-rater reliability, articles were screened and data extracted in duplicate using the Covidence platform. INPLASY registration protocol INPLASY2024110033.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 5424 records, and after removing duplicates and screening, we extracted data from 95 articles. Identified studies provided additional questions and procedural steps for assessing adherence, use of non-prescription medications and substances (eg, alcohol, smoking, cannabis, recreational use), and integration of virtual care into the BPMH guide. Perceived facilitators and barriers to conducting a BPMH included clinical leadership support for trained healthcare professionals to perform a BPMH, virtual care, access to technology, and intact hearing for patients or interviewed caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified additional questions and approaches for updating the ISMP Canada BPMH interview guide. Additional feedback from users of the existing interview guide, and patients and caregivers who have participated in a BPMH interview should be integrated through codesign into the new updated ISMP Canada BPMH guide.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>INPLASY2024110033.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12911780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146200175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing consistent pretreatment multidisciplinary review for breast cancer: a quality improvement project. 实施一致的乳腺癌预处理多学科评价:一个质量改进项目。
IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-15 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003815
Karina Makarova, Allison Chiu, Rebecca Warburton, Amy Bazzarelli, Melina Deban, Carol Dingee, Jieun Newman-Bremang, Jin-Si Pao, Elaine McKevitt

Modern breast cancer care is multimodal and multidisciplinary, and a lack of structured communication between members in different disciplines can introduce obstacles in a patient's journey, resulting in potential treatment delays. In this study, we aimed to increase the percentage of more complex breast cancer cases reviewed pretreatment in a multidisciplinary setting in order to improve breast cancer management at our breast programme. We first started by examining cases of a lower volume complex procedure, oncoplastic breast reconstruction, and aimed to increase the number reviewed preoperatively from 0% to 50% by May 2023. We then expanded the process to include all cases categorised as 'complex', aiming to increase the number reviewed from 0% to 50% by April 2024. We prospectively collected data on all triaged cancer cases to track the number of cases reviewed, with the conclusion that both aims were achieved. Feedback surveys were distributed to conference members at three study time points to assess benefits, challenges, perceptions of the process and ideas for department-specific sustainability. Our findings emphasise that pretreatment review is effective, with 23% of cases resulting in management changes directly as a result of review.

现代乳腺癌护理是多模式和多学科的,不同学科的成员之间缺乏结构化的沟通可能会给患者的旅程带来障碍,导致潜在的治疗延误。在这项研究中,我们的目标是在多学科背景下提高更复杂的乳腺癌病例预处理的百分比,以改善我们乳腺癌项目的乳腺癌管理。我们首先从检查小体积复杂手术的病例开始,肿瘤乳房重建,目标是到2023年5月将术前检查的数量从0%增加到50%。然后,我们将这一过程扩大到包括所有被归类为“复杂”的病例,目标是到2024年4月将审查的数量从0%增加到50%。我们前瞻性地收集了所有经过分类的癌症病例的数据,以跟踪审查的病例数量,结论是两个目标都实现了。反馈调查在三个研究时间点分发给会议成员,以评估效益、挑战、对程序的看法和部门具体可持续性的想法。我们的研究结果强调,预处理审查是有效的,23%的病例直接由于审查而导致管理变化。
{"title":"Implementing consistent pretreatment multidisciplinary review for breast cancer: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Karina Makarova, Allison Chiu, Rebecca Warburton, Amy Bazzarelli, Melina Deban, Carol Dingee, Jieun Newman-Bremang, Jin-Si Pao, Elaine McKevitt","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003815","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern breast cancer care is multimodal and multidisciplinary, and a lack of structured communication between members in different disciplines can introduce obstacles in a patient's journey, resulting in potential treatment delays. In this study, we aimed to increase the percentage of more complex breast cancer cases reviewed pretreatment in a multidisciplinary setting in order to improve breast cancer management at our breast programme. We first started by examining cases of a lower volume complex procedure, oncoplastic breast reconstruction, and aimed to increase the number reviewed preoperatively from 0% to 50% by May 2023. We then expanded the process to include all cases categorised as 'complex', aiming to increase the number reviewed from 0% to 50% by April 2024. We prospectively collected data on all triaged cancer cases to track the number of cases reviewed, with the conclusion that both aims were achieved. Feedback surveys were distributed to conference members at three study time points to assess benefits, challenges, perceptions of the process and ideas for department-specific sustainability. Our findings emphasise that pretreatment review is effective, with 23% of cases resulting in management changes directly as a result of review.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12911702/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146200194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BMJ Open Quality
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1