首页 > 最新文献

Cirugia espanola最新文献

英文 中文
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy in the management of hepatolithiasis 经皮经肝胆管镜治疗肝结石。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.06.011
Ana Belén Martín Arnau , Antonio Molera Espelt , Jordi Villaba Auñon , Santiago Sánchez-Cabús
The treatment of lithiasis in patients with biliodigestive bypass can be controversial. The combination of percutaneous access together with cholangioscopy is an alternative to surgical treatment for the management of this pathology.
In recent years, the appearance of smaller and more flexible fiber-optic cholangioscopes as well as the possibility to perform lithotripsy have changed the treatment of this pathology, providing good results. After our experience, we believe that cholangioscopy assisted by a percutaneous approach is a safe technique, with few complications and early recovery for patients in whom it is not possible to perform endoscopic management.
胆道分流术患者的结石治疗可能存在争议。经皮入路联合胆道镜检查是治疗这种病症的手术疗法之外的另一种选择。近年来,体积更小、更灵活的光纤胆道镜的出现以及碎石术的出现改变了这种病理的治疗方法,并取得了良好的效果。根据我们的经验,我们认为经皮方法辅助胆道镜检查是一种安全的技术,对于无法进行内镜治疗的患者来说,并发症少,恢复快。
{"title":"Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy in the management of hepatolithiasis","authors":"Ana Belén Martín Arnau ,&nbsp;Antonio Molera Espelt ,&nbsp;Jordi Villaba Auñon ,&nbsp;Santiago Sánchez-Cabús","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.06.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The treatment of lithiasis in patients with biliodigestive bypass can be controversial. The combination of percutaneous access together with cholangioscopy is an alternative to surgical treatment for the management of this pathology.</div><div>In recent years, the appearance of smaller and more flexible fiber-optic cholangioscopes as well as the possibility to perform lithotripsy have changed the treatment of this pathology, providing good results. After our experience, we believe that cholangioscopy assisted by a percutaneous approach is a safe technique, with few complications and early recovery for patients in whom it is not possible to perform endoscopic management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":"102 11","pages":"Pages 599-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are surgeons the worst part of surgery? 外科医生是手术中最糟糕的部分吗?
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.018
Manuel López Cano
{"title":"Are surgeons the worst part of surgery?","authors":"Manuel López Cano","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":"102 11","pages":"Pages 605-606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PROFUGO study protocol: Predictive model for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and gastrectomy PROFUGO 研究方案:食管切除术和胃切除术后吻合口漏早期诊断的预测模型。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.06.012
Rocío Pérez Quintero , Marcos Bruna Esteban , Antonio José Serrano López
In esophagogastric surgery, the appearance of an anastomotic leak is the most feared complication. Early diagnosis is important for optimal management and successful resolution. For this reason, different studies have investigated the value of the use of markers to predict possible postoperative complications. Because of this, research and the creation of predictive models that identify patients at high risk of developing complications are mandatory in order to obtain an early diagnosis.
The PROFUGO study (PRedictivO Model for Early Diagnosis of anastomotic LEAK after esophagectomy and gastrectomy) is proposed as a prospective and multicenter national study that aims to develop, with the help of artificial intelligence methods, a predictive model that allows for the identification of high-risk cases. of anastomotic leakage and/or major complications by analyzing different clinical and analytical variables collected during the postoperative period of patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy.
在食管胃手术中,出现吻合口漏是最可怕的并发症。早期诊断对于优化治疗和成功解决问题非常重要。因此,不同的研究都对使用标记物预测术后可能出现的并发症的价值进行了调查。因此,为了获得早期诊断,必须进行研究并建立预测模型,以确定哪些患者有发生并发症的高风险。PROFUGO 研究(食管切除术和胃切除术后吻合口漏早期诊断的 PRedictivO 模型)是一项前瞻性多中心全国性研究,旨在借助人工智能方法开发一种预测模型,通过分析食管切除术或胃切除术患者术后期间收集的不同临床和分析变量,识别吻合口漏和/或主要并发症的高风险病例。
{"title":"PROFUGO study protocol: Predictive model for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and gastrectomy","authors":"Rocío Pérez Quintero ,&nbsp;Marcos Bruna Esteban ,&nbsp;Antonio José Serrano López","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In esophagogastric surgery, the appearance of an anastomotic leak is the most feared complication. Early diagnosis is important for optimal management and successful resolution. For this reason, different studies have investigated the value of the use of markers to predict possible postoperative complications. Because of this, research and the creation of predictive models that identify patients at high risk of developing complications are mandatory in order to obtain an early diagnosis.</div><div>The PROFUGO study (PRedictivO Model for Early Diagnosis of anastomotic LEAK after esophagectomy and gastrectomy) is proposed as a prospective and multicenter national study that aims to develop, with the help of artificial intelligence methods, a predictive model that allows for the identification of high-risk cases. of anastomotic leakage and/or major complications by analyzing different clinical and analytical variables collected during the postoperative period of patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":"102 11","pages":"Pages 624-629"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of indocyanine green in difficult cholecystectomies: a tool to avoid bile duct injuries. 在困难胆囊切除术中使用吲哚菁绿:避免胆管损伤的工具。
Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.004
Gian Mario D'Ambrosio, Víctor Molina Santos, Belén Martin Arnau, Santiago Sánchez Cabús
{"title":"Use of indocyanine green in difficult cholecystectomies: a tool to avoid bile duct injuries.","authors":"Gian Mario D'Ambrosio, Víctor Molina Santos, Belén Martin Arnau, Santiago Sánchez Cabús","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142570676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR): a paradigm shift. 错配修复缺陷(dMMR)局部晚期直肠癌的新辅助治疗:范式转变。
Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.003
Alba Manuel-Vázquez, Miguel Soria Tristán, José Miguel Martín Martínez, José Luis Ramos Rodríguez
{"title":"Neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR): a paradigm shift.","authors":"Alba Manuel-Vázquez, Miguel Soria Tristán, José Miguel Martín Martínez, José Luis Ramos Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142514691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-term results of unroofing and marsupialization compared to the Karydakis technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. A randomized prospective study. 在治疗朝天鼻窦时,与 Karydakis 技术相比,屋顶切开术和臼齿化术的短期效果如何?随机前瞻性研究。
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.002
Pedro Antonio Parra Baños, Nuria Martínez Sanz, Francisco Miguel González Valverde, Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje, Miguel Ruiz Marín, Emilio Peña Ros, Carmen Martínez Sanz, Mari Fe Candel Arenas

Introduction: The treatment of pilonidal sinus (PS) is usually surgical, but no procedure is considered the gold standard. The Karydakis (K) technique is widely used, and unroofing and marsupialization (UM) is a simple surgery with good results.

Primary objective: To evaluate early postoperative complications (EPC) 30 days after UM surgery compared to the K technique.

Secondary objectives: To evaluate surgical time, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, return to daily activity and early recurrence within 3 months.

Method: Prospective, single-center, randomized study in patients who underwent surgery for primary PS with no abscess between June 2016 and November 2017. They were randomized using a computer-generated block method. To analyze the main objective, a non-inferiority analysis was performed.

Results: 122 patients with symptomatic primary PS were randomized: 60 in the K group and 62 in the UM group. Both groups were homogeneous. There were statistically significant differences between surgery and postoperative complications at 15 and 30 days in favor of UM. There were also differences in favor of UM in surgical time and return to daily activity. During the 90-day follow-up, there were 3 recurrences in the UM group and 0 in the K group.

Conclusions: UM is a simple, minimally invasive, easily reproducible technique that has a lower rate of early complications, with a shorter operative time and an earlier return to daily activity.

导言:治疗朝天鼻窦(PS)的方法通常是手术,但没有一种方法被认为是金标准。Karydakis(K)技术被广泛使用,而UM(Unroofing and marsupialization)是一种简单的手术,效果良好:与 K 技术相比,评估 UM 手术后 30 天的早期术后并发症(EPC):次要目标:评估手术时间、术后疼痛、患者满意度、恢复日常活动情况以及3个月内的早期复发情况:前瞻性、单中心、随机研究,对象为2016年6月至2017年11月期间接受手术治疗的无脓肿原发性PS患者。采用计算机生成区组的方法对他们进行随机分组。为分析主要目标,进行了非劣效性分析:122名无症状原发性PS患者被随机分组:K组60人,UM组62人。两组患者病情相同。手术和术后 15 天和 30 天并发症之间的差异有统计学意义,UM 更优。在手术时间和恢复日常活动方面,UM 也更胜一筹。在 90 天的随访中,UM 组有 3 例复发,K 组为 0 例:UM是一种简单、微创、易于重复的技术,其早期并发症发生率较低,手术时间较短,恢复日常活动的时间较早。
{"title":"Short-term results of unroofing and marsupialization compared to the Karydakis technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. A randomized prospective study.","authors":"Pedro Antonio Parra Baños, Nuria Martínez Sanz, Francisco Miguel González Valverde, Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje, Miguel Ruiz Marín, Emilio Peña Ros, Carmen Martínez Sanz, Mari Fe Candel Arenas","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of pilonidal sinus (PS) is usually surgical, but no procedure is considered the gold standard. The Karydakis (K) technique is widely used, and unroofing and marsupialization (UM) is a simple surgery with good results.</p><p><strong>Primary objective: </strong>To evaluate early postoperative complications (EPC) 30 days after UM surgery compared to the K technique.</p><p><strong>Secondary objectives: </strong>To evaluate surgical time, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, return to daily activity and early recurrence within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Prospective, single-center, randomized study in patients who underwent surgery for primary PS with no abscess between June 2016 and November 2017. They were randomized using a computer-generated block method. To analyze the main objective, a non-inferiority analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>122 patients with symptomatic primary PS were randomized: 60 in the K group and 62 in the UM group. Both groups were homogeneous. There were statistically significant differences between surgery and postoperative complications at 15 and 30 days in favor of UM. There were also differences in favor of UM in surgical time and return to daily activity. During the 90-day follow-up, there were 3 recurrences in the UM group and 0 in the K group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UM is a simple, minimally invasive, easily reproducible technique that has a lower rate of early complications, with a shorter operative time and an earlier return to daily activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specific training in coloproctology: cross-sectional cohort study through the Young Group of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology. 结肠直肠专科培训:通过西班牙结肠直肠协会青年组进行的横断面队列研究。
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.011
Tamara Fernández-Miguel, Óscar Cano-Valderrama, Marta Paniagua García-Señorans, Alba Correa Bonito, Emilio Peña Ros, María Luisa Reyes-Díaz, Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz

Introduction: Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.

Material and methods: An online survey addressed by the "Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología" has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.

Results: 128 surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31,5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82,8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.

Conclusions: Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.

导言:外科超级专科的特殊培训及其客观评估是当今的一项挑战,以衡量其可能带来的潜在益处:材料和方法:"西班牙结直肠外科协会青少年小组 "进行了一项在线调查,以评估结直肠外科专项培训的水平:结果:128 名外科医生代表 81 个结直肠外科单位参加了此次活动。84%的受访者在培训期结束后的平均满意度为中高。改进的主要方面是实现先进的外科技术(52%)和学术问题(45%)。大部分受访者在培训期间进行过简单的直肠外科手术(98%)和肿瘤开放性结肠切除术(100%),但很少观察到相关的盆底手术(20%)和诊断技术(10-45%)。科研成果(31.5%)和在大会上发表研究报告(82.8%)均受到了控制。经认可的单位和未经认可的单位之间没有差异:结肠直肠外科的特殊培养是适当的,培养过程中由个人实施的简单手术和开腹手术水平较高。鉴于这些结果,我们似乎可以合乎逻辑地认为,即使在微创和诊断技术的培养方面取得进展是必要的。
{"title":"Specific training in coloproctology: cross-sectional cohort study through the Young Group of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology.","authors":"Tamara Fernández-Miguel, Óscar Cano-Valderrama, Marta Paniagua García-Señorans, Alba Correa Bonito, Emilio Peña Ros, María Luisa Reyes-Díaz, Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An online survey addressed by the \"Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología\" has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>128 surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31,5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82,8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Decision-making concordance in thoracic drain management: is necessary previous experience? 胸腔引流管管理决策的一致性:是否需要先前的经验?
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.013
Álvaro Fuentes-Martín, Miriam Suena Doncel, José Soro García, Mauricio Alfredo Loucel Bellino, Itziar Gómez-Salvador, Manuel Carrasco-Moraleja, Ángel Cilleruelo Ramos

Introduction: Proper management of thoracic drainages is essential in the recovery of patients after lung resection. This study evaluates the concordance in decision-making for drain removal depending on the type of drainage system used and the previous experience of the personnel.

Material and methods: Prospective, comparative, and stratified randomization study on interobserver variability between senior specialist doctors and inexperienced healthcare personnel in the removal of thoracic drains in patients undergoing lung resection connected to conventional systems (CS) or digital systems (DS) with continuous recording. The withdrawal criteria were established before the study, and decisions were recorded during three postoperative days.

Results: 75 patients were included, 38 CS and 37 DS, with no statistically significant differences in sex distribution, age, intervention performed, presence of pleuropulmonary adhesions, drain time, or post-extraction complications between the groups. The overall concordance in drain removal decisions was moderate (kappa = 0.452), with notable variations in concordance depending on the drainage system used: CS (kappa = 0.188) with an overall agreement rate of 61.7% compared to DS (kappa = 0.716) with an overall agreement rate of 86.4%. Digital systems showed substantial concordance regardless of the operator's experience, with kappa values indicating high concordance on all postoperative days.

Conclusions: The use of digital systems for managing thoracic drains significantly improves concordance in clinical decision-making regardless of the experience level. These findings suggest that adopting digital systems not only optimizes patient safety but also reduces the dependence on highly specialized healthcare professionals.

导言:正确处理胸腔引流管对肺切除术后患者的康复至关重要。本研究评估了引流管移除决策的一致性,这取决于所使用的引流系统类型和工作人员以往的经验:前瞻性、比较性和分层随机研究:资深专科医生和缺乏经验的医护人员在为接受肺切除术的患者拔除连接到传统系统(CS)或带连续记录功能的数字系统(DS)的胸腔引流管时的观察者间差异。研究前制定了撤管标准,并记录了术后三天内的撤管决定:两组患者在性别分布、年龄、干预措施、是否存在胸膜肺粘连、引流时间或拔管后并发症方面均无统计学差异。引流管移除决定的总体一致性为中等(kappa = 0.452),根据所用引流系统的不同,一致性也有明显差异:CS(kappa = 0.188)的总体一致率为61.7%,而DS(kappa = 0.716)的总体一致率为86.4%。无论操作者的经验如何,数字系统都显示出很大的一致性,kappa 值表明术后所有天数的一致性都很高:结论:使用数字系统管理胸腔引流管可显著提高临床决策的一致性,与经验水平无关。这些研究结果表明,采用数字化系统不仅能优化患者安全,还能减少对高度专业化医护人员的依赖。
{"title":"Decision-making concordance in thoracic drain management: is necessary previous experience?","authors":"Álvaro Fuentes-Martín, Miriam Suena Doncel, José Soro García, Mauricio Alfredo Loucel Bellino, Itziar Gómez-Salvador, Manuel Carrasco-Moraleja, Ángel Cilleruelo Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proper management of thoracic drainages is essential in the recovery of patients after lung resection. This study evaluates the concordance in decision-making for drain removal depending on the type of drainage system used and the previous experience of the personnel.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Prospective, comparative, and stratified randomization study on interobserver variability between senior specialist doctors and inexperienced healthcare personnel in the removal of thoracic drains in patients undergoing lung resection connected to conventional systems (CS) or digital systems (DS) with continuous recording. The withdrawal criteria were established before the study, and decisions were recorded during three postoperative days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75 patients were included, 38 CS and 37 DS, with no statistically significant differences in sex distribution, age, intervention performed, presence of pleuropulmonary adhesions, drain time, or post-extraction complications between the groups. The overall concordance in drain removal decisions was moderate (kappa = 0.452), with notable variations in concordance depending on the drainage system used: CS (kappa = 0.188) with an overall agreement rate of 61.7% compared to DS (kappa = 0.716) with an overall agreement rate of 86.4%. Digital systems showed substantial concordance regardless of the operator's experience, with kappa values indicating high concordance on all postoperative days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of digital systems for managing thoracic drains significantly improves concordance in clinical decision-making regardless of the experience level. These findings suggest that adopting digital systems not only optimizes patient safety but also reduces the dependence on highly specialized healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Registration of a research project - clinical trial: which, when, where, and how. 注册研究项目 - 临床试验:何事、何时、何地、如何进行。
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.014
Anna Nonell, Xavier Serra Aracil
{"title":"Registration of a research project - clinical trial: which, when, where, and how.","authors":"Anna Nonell, Xavier Serra Aracil","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in colorectal cancer surgery. 结直肠癌手术中的患者报告结果指标 (PROM)。
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.001
Romina Pena, Marta Pascual
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in colorectal cancer surgery.","authors":"Romina Pena, Marta Pascual","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cirugia espanola
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1