首页 > 最新文献

Cirugia espanola最新文献

英文 中文
Why do residents not choose General Surgery or surgical specialties? 为什么住院医师不选择普通外科或外科专科?
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.011
{"title":"Why do residents not choose General Surgery or surgical specialties?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141034053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
10 years of prehabilitation: From theory to clinical practice 预康复10年:从理论到临床实践。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.010

In recent years, prehabilitation has generated high expectations as an innovative preoperative strategy to enhance clinical outcomes following surgery. Several studies have demonstrated that multimodal programs are effective in improving patients’ health status and cardiopulmonary reserve, allowing them to undergo surgery in better conditions and, consequently, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.

Most publications describe proof-of-concept studies, and literature about their implementation is more limited. The implementation of these programs requires new resources and significant organizational effort.

In this paper, we share our experience implementing a multimodal prehabilitation program as a mainstream service at a tertiary hospital. Although there are still many unknowns regarding the optimal selection of patients, as well as the duration and components of the program, this article describes our journey in this field, aiming to provide insight for teams interested in developing a similar project.

近年来,术前康复作为一种创新的术前策略被寄予厚望,以提高手术后的临床疗效。多项研究表明,多模式康复计划能有效改善患者的健康状况和心肺功能储备,让他们在更好的条件下接受手术,从而降低术后并发症的发生率。大多数出版物描述的是概念验证研究,而有关其实施的文献则较为有限。这些计划的实施需要新的资源和大量的组织工作。在本文中,我们分享了在一家三级医院将多模式术前康复计划作为主流服务的实施经验。尽管在患者的最佳选择、项目的持续时间和组成部分等方面仍有许多未知数,但本文描述了我们在这一领域的历程,旨在为有意开展类似项目的团队提供启示。
{"title":"10 years of prehabilitation: From theory to clinical practice","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, prehabilitation has generated high expectations as an innovative preoperative strategy to enhance clinical outcomes following surgery. Several studies have demonstrated that multimodal programs are effective in improving patients’ health status and cardiopulmonary reserve, allowing them to undergo surgery in better conditions and, consequently, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.</p><p>Most publications describe proof-of-concept studies, and literature about their implementation is more limited. The implementation of these programs requires new resources and significant organizational effort.</p><p>In this paper, we share our experience implementing a multimodal prehabilitation program as a mainstream service at a tertiary hospital. Although there are still many unknowns regarding the optimal selection of patients, as well as the duration and components of the program, this article describes our journey in this field, aiming to provide insight for teams interested in developing a similar project.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140893033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A rare cause of acute abdominal pain: Perforation of a hepatic hydatid cyst into the peritoneum 急性腹痛的罕见病因:肝包虫囊肿穿孔进入腹膜。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.02.011
{"title":"A rare cause of acute abdominal pain: Perforation of a hepatic hydatid cyst into the peritoneum","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.02.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.02.011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140760845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radical cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal sarcomatosis: Results from a reference center and considerations based on current evidence 治疗腹膜肉瘤病的根治性细胞切除手术和腹腔内热化疗:参考中心的研究结果和基于现有证据的考虑。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.015

Introduction

Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare disease, with multiple histological origins and poor overall prognosis. The option of radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The results of a surgical team experienced in these procedures are analyzed and discussed based on the available evidence.

Methods

Study on a prospective database of patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis who underwent CRS and HIPEC, from 2016 to 2022, in a national reference center for sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery, who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Results

23 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (6−68). Recurrent/persistent clinical presentation predominated (78.3%). Visceral origin (including GIST and non-GIST peritoneal) accounted for 47.8% of patients, compared to 43.5% uterine and 8.7% retroperitoneal. The median PCI was 17 (3−36), with CC0 cytoreduction of 87%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo Clavien III–IV) of 13%, with no postoperative mortality in the series. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were 64% and 34%, respectively. Histological grade was the most influential prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

The results of the series, with low morbidity, support the benefit of radical peritoneal oncological surgery in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis after adequate selection, as long as it is performed in high-volume centers, experienced surgeons and expert multidisciplinary teams. However, the role of HIPEC remains to be demonstrated and pending future studies.

简介腹膜肉瘤病是一种罕见疾病,有多种组织学起源,总体预后较差。根治性细胞切除手术(CRS)与热疗腹腔化疗(HIPEC)的选择存在争议。本文基于现有证据,分析并讨论了一个在这些手术方面经验丰富的手术团队的结果:研究对象为2016年至2022年在国家肉瘤和腹膜肿瘤外科参考中心接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的腹膜肉瘤病患者,符合既定的纳入/排除标准。临床表现以复发性/持续性为主(78.3%)。内脏来源(包括GIST和非GIST腹膜)的患者占47.8%,而子宫来源和腹膜后来源的患者分别占43.5%和8.7%。PCI中位数为17(3-36),CC0细胞减少率为87%。术后发病率(Dindo Clavien III-IV)为 13%,系列手术中无术后死亡病例。5年的总生存率和无病生存率分别为64%和34%。组织学分级是对生存率影响最大的预后因素:该系列研究的结果表明,腹膜肿瘤根治术对腹膜肉瘤病患者的益处在于发病率低,只要在大容量中心、经验丰富的外科医生和多学科专家团队的充分筛选下进行腹膜肿瘤根治术即可。不过,腹腔内癌根治术的作用仍有待证明,有待今后的研究。
{"title":"Radical cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal sarcomatosis: Results from a reference center and considerations based on current evidence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare disease, with multiple histological origins and poor overall prognosis. The option of radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with </span>hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The results of a surgical team experienced in these procedures are analyzed and discussed based on the available evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Study on a prospective database of patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis who underwent CRS and HIPEC, from 2016 to 2022, in a national reference center for sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery, who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>23 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (6−68). Recurrent/persistent clinical presentation predominated (78.3%). Visceral origin (including GIST and non-GIST peritoneal) accounted for 47.8% of patients, compared to 43.5% uterine and 8.7% retroperitoneal. The median PCI was 17 (3−36), with CC0 cytoreduction of 87%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo Clavien III–IV) of 13%, with no </span>postoperative mortality in the series. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were 64% and 34%, respectively. Histological grade was the most influential </span>prognostic factor for survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the series, with low morbidity, support the benefit of radical peritoneal oncological surgery in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis after adequate selection, as long as it is performed in high-volume centers, experienced surgeons and expert multidisciplinary teams. However, the role of HIPEC remains to be demonstrated and pending future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison and combination of three data sources from patient medical records to determine optimal quantification of postoperative morbidity according to the Clavien Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index. A prospective study 根据克拉维恩-丁多分类法和综合并发症指数,比较并结合患者病历中的三种数据来源,确定术后发病率的最佳量化方法。一项前瞻性研究。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.001

Introduction

It is currently unknown which data sources from the clinical history, or combination thereof, should be evaluated to achieve the most complete calculation of postoperative complications (PC).

The objectives of this study were: to analyze the morbidity and mortality of 200 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery, to determine which data sources or combination collect the maximum morbidity, and to determine the accuracy of the morbidity reflected in the discharge report.

Methods

Observational and prospective cohort study.

The sum of all PC found in the combined review of medical notes, nursing notes, and a specific form was considered the gold standard. PC were classified according to the Clavien Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).

Results

The percentage of patients who presented PC according to the gold standard, medical notes, nursing notes and form were: 43.5%, 37.5%, 35% and 18.7% respectively.

The combination of sources improved CCI agreement by 8%–40% in the overall series and 39.1–89.7 % in patients with PC. The correct recording of PC was inversely proportional to the complexity of the surgery, and the combination of sources increased the degree of agreement with the gold standard by 35 %–67.5% in operations of greater complexity.

The CDC and CCI of the discharge report coincided with the gold-standard values in patients with PC by 46.8% and 18.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of data sources, particularly medical and nursing notes, considerably increases the quantification of PC in general, most notably in complex interventions.

导言:目前尚不清楚应评估临床病史中的哪些数据源或其组合,以实现最完整的术后并发症(PC)计算。本研究的目的是:分析连续接受大手术的 200 名患者的发病率和死亡率,确定哪些数据源或数据源组合收集的发病率最高,并确定出院报告中反映的发病率的准确性:方法:观察性和前瞻性队列研究。方法:观察性和前瞻性队列研究,将综合审查医疗记录、护理记录和特定表格中发现的所有 PC 的总和作为金标准。PC根据克拉维恩-丁多分类法和综合并发症指数(CCI)进行分类:根据金标准、医疗记录、护理记录和表格,出现 PC 的患者比例分别为:43.5%、37.5%、37.5%、43.5%、37.5%、37.5%:分别为 43.5%、37.5%、35% 和 18.7%。在整个系列中,综合使用各种来源的数据可将 CCI 的一致性提高 8%-40%,在 PC 患者中的一致性提高 39.1%-89.7%。PC 的正确记录与手术的复杂程度成反比,在复杂程度较高的手术中,联合使用数据源可将与金标准的一致性提高 35%-67.5%。出院报告中的CDC和CCI与PC患者黄金标准值的吻合度分别为46.8%和18.2%:结论:结合数据源,尤其是医疗和护理记录,可大大提高 PC 的量化程度,尤其是在复杂的介入手术中。
{"title":"Comparison and combination of three data sources from patient medical records to determine optimal quantification of postoperative morbidity according to the Clavien Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index. A prospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is currently unknown which data sources from the clinical history, or combination thereof, should be evaluated to achieve the most complete calculation of postoperative complications (PC).</p><p>The objectives of this study were: to analyze the morbidity and mortality of 200 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery, to determine which data sources or combination collect the maximum morbidity, and to determine the accuracy of the morbidity reflected in the discharge report.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational and prospective cohort study.</p><p>The sum of all PC found in the combined review of medical notes, nursing notes, and a specific form was considered the gold standard. PC were classified according to the Clavien Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The percentage of patients who presented PC according to the gold standard, medical notes, nursing notes and form were: 43.5%, 37.5%, 35% and 18.7% respectively.</p><p>The combination of sources improved CCI agreement by 8%–40% in the overall series and 39.1–89.7 % in patients with PC. The correct recording of PC was inversely proportional to the complexity of the surgery, and the combination of sources increased the degree of agreement with the gold standard by 35 %–67.5% in operations of greater complexity.</p><p>The CDC and CCI of the discharge report coincided with the gold-standard values in patients with PC by 46.8% and 18.2%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combination of data sources, particularly medical and nursing notes, considerably increases the quantification of PC in general, most notably in complex interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140856254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intermittent gastroesophageal prolapse after a Nissen funduplication treated with Hill gastropexy 用山形胃切除术治疗尼森胃底折叠术后的间歇性胃食管脱垂。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.008
{"title":"Intermittent gastroesophageal prolapse after a Nissen funduplication treated with Hill gastropexy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141199926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to: laparoscopic hybrid mini-ALPPS using transmesenteric intra-operative portal embolization for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 回应:使用经肠管术中门体栓塞治疗局部晚期肝内胆管癌的腹腔镜混合迷你腹腔镜手术。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.020
{"title":"Response to: laparoscopic hybrid mini-ALPPS using transmesenteric intra-operative portal embolization for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141294057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delay in the residents’ choice for General and Digestive Surgery: Analysis of the period 2018–2022 居民选择普通外科和消化外科的延迟:2018-2022年期间的分析。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.08.006

Introduction

Every year hundreds of medical residents choose their specialization in various surgical fields. However, these numbers have been poorly analyzed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selection of General and Digestive Surgery by medical residents and compare these results with the selection of other surgical specialties.

Methods

Cross-sectional observational study. The data from the selection of the medical residents from surgical specialties and the top 10 most demanded specialties between the years 2018 and 2022 were included. An analysis of adjusted ranking numbers based on the number of available positions was also conducted.

Results

The number of available positions in General and Digestive Surgery increased by 17.7% during the study period. However, the selection of our specialty has been delayed, with a median ranking number of 2419 (IQR: 1621–3284) in 2018, and 3484 (IQR: 2306–4156) in 2022 (p: .000). These differences remained significant after adjusting for the number of available positions (p: .000).

The choice of Urology, Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery, Gastroenterology, and Paediatrics also declined during this period, while Plastic Surgery, Dermatology, Ophthalmology, Anesthesiology, and Endocrinology improved their numbers.

Conclusion

The choice of General and Digestive Surgery has been delayed according to the data from the MIR selection of 2018–2022. The increase in the number of available positions has not been associated with a proportional increase in demand.

导读:每年都有数百名住院医师选择他们在各种外科领域的专业。然而,对这些数字的分析并不充分。本研究的目的是评估住院医师对普通外科和消化外科的选择,并将这些结果与其他外科专业的选择进行比较。方法:横断面观察研究。纳入了2018 - 2022年外科专业住院医师选拔数据和需求量最大的前10个专业数据。还根据空缺职位的数量对调整后的排名数字进行了分析。结果:在研究期间,普通外科和消化外科的空缺职位数量增加了17.7%。然而,我们的专业选择被推迟,2018年排名中位数为2419 (IQR: 1621-3284), 2022年排名中位数为3484 (IQR: 2306-4156) (p: 0.000)。在调整了可用职位数量后,这些差异仍然显着(p: 0.000)。泌尿外科、胸外科、心血管外科、消化系统、儿科的选择也有所减少,而整形外科、皮肤科、眼科、麻醉科、内分泌科的选择则有所增加。结论:根据2018-2022年MIR选择数据,普通外科和消化外科的选择有所延迟。空缺职位数量的增加并没有与需求的成比例增长联系在一起。
{"title":"Delay in the residents’ choice for General and Digestive Surgery: Analysis of the period 2018–2022","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2023.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Every year hundreds of medical residents choose their specialization in various surgical fields. However, these numbers have been poorly analyzed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selection of General and Digestive Surgery by medical residents and compare these results with the selection of other surgical specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional observational study. The data from the selection of the medical residents from surgical specialties and the top 10 most demanded specialties between the years 2018 and 2022 were included. An analysis of adjusted ranking numbers based on the number of available positions was also conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of available positions in General and Digestive Surgery increased by 17.7% during the study period. However, the selection of our specialty has been delayed, with a median ranking number of 2419 (IQR: 1621–3284) in 2018, and 3484 (IQR: 2306–4156) in 2022 (<em>p</em>: .000). These differences remained significant after adjusting for the number of available positions (<em>p</em>: .000).</p><p><span>The choice of Urology<span><span>, Thoracic Surgery<span>, Cardiovascular Surgery, </span></span>Gastroenterology, and </span></span>Paediatrics<span><span> also declined during this period, while Plastic Surgery, Dermatology, </span>Ophthalmology<span>, Anesthesiology<span>, and Endocrinology improved their numbers.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The choice of General and Digestive Surgery has been delayed according to the data from the MIR selection of 2018–2022. The increase in the number of available positions has not been associated with a proportional increase in demand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138296797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of whole-mount and conventional sections for pathological mesorectal extension and circumferential resection margin assessment after total mesorectal excision 比较全层切片与传统切片在全直肠系膜切除术后病理直肠系膜延伸和周缘切除边缘评估中的应用。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.01.008

Introduction

The objective of the study is to compare 2 techniques for histological handling of rectal cancer specimens, namely whole-mount in a large block vs conventional sampling using small blocks, for mesorectal pathological assessment of circumferential resection margin status and depth of tumor invasion into the mesorectal fat.

Methods

This is a prospective study including 27 total mesorectal excision specimens of rectal cancer from patients treated for primary rectal carcinoma between 2020 and 2022 in a specialized multidisciplinary Colorectal Unit. For each total mesorectal excision specimen, 2 contiguous representative tumoral slices were selected and comparatively analyzed with whole-mount and small blocks macroscopic dissection techniques, enabling comparison between them in the same surgical specimen. The agreement between the 2 techniques to assess the distance of the tumor from the circumferential resection margin as well as the depth of tumor invasion was evaluated with the Student’s t-test for paired samples, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and the Bland-Altman method comparison analysis.

Results

Complete mesorectal excision was observed in 8% of cases. Circumferential resection margin involvement was observed in only one case (4 %). The whole-mount and small block techniques obtained similar results when we assessed the distance to the circumferential resection margin (t-test P = 0.8, r = 0.92) and the depth of mesorectal infiltration (t-test P = 0.6, r = 0.95).

Conclusions

Both gross dissection techniques (whole-mount vs multiple small cassettes) are equivalent and reliable to assess the distance to circumferential resection margin and the depth of mesorectal infiltration in the mesorectal fat in rectal cancer staging.

简介该研究的目的是比较两种直肠癌标本组织学处理技术(即大块全切与传统的小块取样),以对直肠间质切除边缘状态和肿瘤侵犯直肠间质脂肪的深度进行病理评估:这是一项前瞻性研究,包括 27 份直肠癌直肠间质全切除标本,这些标本来自 2020 年至 2022 年期间在结直肠专科多学科病房接受治疗的原发性直肠癌患者。在每份直肠直肠间全切标本中,选择 2 个连续的有代表性的肿瘤切片,采用全切片和小块宏观解剖技术进行比较分析,以便在同一手术标本中进行比较。通过配对样本的学生 t 检验、皮尔逊相关系数和 Bland-Altman 方法对比分析,评估了两种技术在评估肿瘤与周缘切除边缘的距离以及肿瘤侵犯深度方面的一致性:结果:8%的病例可观察到完整的直肠系膜切除。仅有一例(4%)观察到环形切除边缘受累。当我们评估与周缘切除边缘的距离(t 检验 P = .8,r=0.92)和直肠系膜浸润深度(t 检验 P = .6,r=0.95)时,全层解剖技术和小块解剖技术获得了相似的结果:结论:在直肠癌分期中,两种大体解剖技术(整块解剖与多块小盒解剖)在评估直肠癌周缘切除边缘距离和直肠系膜脂肪浸润深度方面是等效和可靠的。
{"title":"A comparison of whole-mount and conventional sections for pathological mesorectal extension and circumferential resection margin assessment after total mesorectal excision","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the study is to compare 2 techniques for histological handling of rectal cancer specimens, namely whole-mount in a large block vs conventional sampling using small blocks, for mesorectal pathological assessment of circumferential resection margin status and depth of tumor invasion into the mesorectal fat.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a prospective study including 27 total mesorectal excision specimens of rectal cancer from patients treated for primary rectal carcinoma between 2020 and 2022 in a specialized multidisciplinary Colorectal Unit. For each total mesorectal excision specimen, 2 contiguous representative tumoral slices were selected and comparatively analyzed with whole-mount and small blocks macroscopic dissection techniques, enabling comparison between them in the same surgical specimen. The agreement between the 2 techniques to assess the distance of the tumor from the circumferential resection margin as well as the depth of tumor invasion was evaluated with the Student’s <em>t</em>-test for paired samples, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and the Bland-Altman method comparison analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Complete mesorectal excision was observed in 8% of cases. Circumferential resection margin involvement was observed in only one case (4 %). The whole-mount and small block techniques obtained similar results when we assessed the distance to the circumferential resection margin (<em>t</em>-test <em>P</em> = 0.8, <em>r</em> = 0.92) and the depth of mesorectal infiltration (<em>t</em>-test <em>P</em> = 0.6, <em>r</em> = 0.95).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both gross dissection techniques (whole-mount vs multiple small cassettes) are equivalent and reliable to assess the distance to circumferential resection margin and the depth of mesorectal infiltration in the mesorectal fat in rectal cancer staging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173507724000498/pdfft?md5=f41bccc446f3a1db19922647d908ae8a&pid=1-s2.0-S2173507724000498-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139907065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tools and resources for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses 进行系统综述和荟萃分析的工具和资源。
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.03.003
{"title":"Tools and resources for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140717073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cirugia espanola
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1