This study investigated the effect of monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) use on self-paced cycling performance, thermoregulation, and skeletal muscle strength and contractile properties in healthy women. Eight physically active women performed 30 min fixed intensity cycling at 50% Wmax, followed by a 30 min self-paced time trial (TT) with each section interspersed with a 30 s maximal sprint at 9, 19, and 29 min. The tests were conducted in different ambient conditions corresponding to either baseline day 1 (20°C, BASE), day 8 (20°C COOL), or day 18 (32°C WARM) of 1 month pill cycle. Core (Tc) and skin (Tsk) temperatures, heart rate, perceptual, neuromuscular responses, and serum cortisol (CORT) were measured multiple times throughout the trials and postexercise. Time trial performance remained unchanged across conditions (range 10.9–11.1 km) although Tc was elevated in WARM in the final 15 min of self-paced exercise, reaching 38.5°C (p < 0.05). CORT was increased from preexercise, whereas lactate increased in all conditions (p < 0.05). Peak force was significantly reduced from pre (439 ± 95 and 429 ± 121 N) to postexercise (345 ± 91 and 361 ± 94 N) for BASE and WARM, respectively, (p < 0.05). Twitch contractile duration declined (∼14%; p < 0.05) in all conditions along with time to peak force (∼17%, p < 0.05) in BASE and WARM. We conclude that OC use does not affect self-paced cycling performance across ambient conditions with no detrimental alteration in neuromuscular performance across the menstrual cycle.
{"title":"Comparative Responses of Self-Regulated Exercise, Thermoregulation, and Neuromuscular Function to Monophasic Oral Contraceptives Across One Menstrual Cycle","authors":"Katie James, Jack Cannon, Frank E. Marino","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70083","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejsc.70083","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the effect of monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) use on self-paced cycling performance, thermoregulation, and skeletal muscle strength and contractile properties in healthy women. Eight physically active women performed 30 min fixed intensity cycling at 50% <i>W</i><sub>max</sub>, followed by a 30 min self-paced time trial (TT) with each section interspersed with a 30 s maximal sprint at 9, 19, and 29 min. The tests were conducted in different ambient conditions corresponding to either baseline day 1 (20°C, BASE), day 8 (20°C COOL), or day 18 (32°C WARM) of 1 month pill cycle. Core (<i>T</i><sub>c</sub>) and skin (<i>T</i><sub>sk</sub>) temperatures, heart rate, perceptual, neuromuscular responses, and serum cortisol (CORT) were measured multiple times throughout the trials and postexercise. Time trial performance remained unchanged across conditions (range 10.9–11.1 km) although <i>T</i><sub>c</sub> was elevated in WARM in the final 15 min of self-paced exercise, reaching 38.5°C (<i>p</i> < 0.05). CORT was increased from preexercise, whereas lactate increased in all conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Peak force was significantly reduced from pre (439 ± 95 and 429 ± 121 <i>N</i>) to postexercise (345 ± 91 and 361 ± 94 <i>N</i>) for BASE and WARM, respectively, (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Twitch contractile duration declined (∼14%; <i>p</i> < 0.05) in all conditions along with time to peak force (∼17%, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in BASE and WARM. We conclude that OC use does not affect self-paced cycling performance across ambient conditions with no detrimental alteration in neuromuscular performance across the menstrual cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717675/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Priska Schmid, Stefan Fröhlich, Torsten Pastor, Lisa Reissner, Andreas Schweizer
Although osteophytes in climbers' fingers are known as part of a mechano-adaption, the progression of osteophytes and contributing factors during an advanced elite climber's career is still unknown. This study analyzes osteophyte growth over 10 years for each phalangeal head and base of all proximal and distal interphalangeal joints (PIP and DIP) individually as well as the impact of potential climbing related influencing factors. Furthermore, the osteophytes located at the palmar neck of the proximal phalanx (palmar neck osteophytes) were investigated separately and joint space narrowing was evaluated and compared with osteophyte growth. Radiographs of 31 male elite climbers were analyzed in lateral view for osteophytes and in anterior–posterior (a.p.) view for joint space at baseline and 10-year follow-up. Even after more than 2 decades of elite climbing, osteophytes grew significantly at most phalangeal heads and bases. Already severely affected joints at baseline, specifically DIP Dig III and IV of both hands, had an especially high effect size (DIP base: Dig III: left; 0.517, right; 0.355, Dig IV: left; 0.519, right; 0.555, DIP head: Dig III: left; 0.348, right; 0.591, Dig IV: left; 0.533, right; 0.408). The extent of osteophytes at baseline is highly predictive for further development (79.3%); however, no climbing-related factors were determinable for additional explanation. Palmar neck osteophytes are pathognomonic to climbing as they are most likely caused by the phalangeal base hitting this area repeatedly in a hyperflexed position. Furthermore, there is no correlation between osteophyte growth and joint space narrowing during an elite climber's career.
{"title":"Osteophyte Growth Over 10 Years in the Fingers of High-Level Climbers and Contributing Factors","authors":"Priska Schmid, Stefan Fröhlich, Torsten Pastor, Lisa Reissner, Andreas Schweizer","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70108","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejsc.70108","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although osteophytes in climbers' fingers are known as part of a mechano-adaption, the progression of osteophytes and contributing factors during an advanced elite climber's career is still unknown. This study analyzes osteophyte growth over 10 years for each phalangeal head and base of all proximal and distal interphalangeal joints (PIP and DIP) individually as well as the impact of potential climbing related influencing factors. Furthermore, the osteophytes located at the palmar neck of the proximal phalanx (palmar neck osteophytes) were investigated separately and joint space narrowing was evaluated and compared with osteophyte growth. Radiographs of 31 male elite climbers were analyzed in lateral view for osteophytes and in anterior–posterior (a.p.) view for joint space at baseline and 10-year follow-up. Even after more than 2 decades of elite climbing, osteophytes grew significantly at most phalangeal heads and bases. Already severely affected joints at baseline, specifically DIP Dig III and IV of both hands, had an especially high effect size (DIP base: Dig III: left; 0.517, right; 0.355, Dig IV: left; 0.519, right; 0.555, DIP head: Dig III: left; 0.348, right; 0.591, Dig IV: left; 0.533, right; 0.408). The extent of osteophytes at baseline is highly predictive for further development (79.3%); however, no climbing-related factors were determinable for additional explanation. Palmar neck osteophytes are pathognomonic to climbing as they are most likely caused by the phalangeal base hitting this area repeatedly in a hyperflexed position. Furthermore, there is no correlation between osteophyte growth and joint space narrowing during an elite climber's career.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Instructions are a common part of training in many sports. The content of the instructions and how they are formulated is relevant for the effect on performance. For motor learning and skill development, instructions that initiate an external focus of attention are predominantly described as beneficial in the literature. We assume that an instruction-guided attentional focus causes an effect on jump performance depending on whether the instruction matches the imagery type. Twenty-nine female participants (Mage = 19.55 ± 3.01 years) with artistic gymnastics expertise (M = 11.38 ± 4.24 years) completed an online questionnaire, the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ-2) and performed stretched jumps with a 450° longitudinal axis (LA) turn in a laboratory setting. Crucial gymnastic-specific performance criteria such as jump height, body position and landing details were recorded and analysed. ANOVA results indicate no significant differences in performance between three instruction groups. Results of linear mixed models analyses show differences between baseline performance and the instruction phases for five variables. There seems to be a disruptive effect on performance when attention is consciously directed. The effect of an instruction-guided attentional focus on performance appears to be independent of the imagery type.
{"title":"Effects of Instruction-Guided Attentional Focus on Jump Performance in Women's Artistic Gymnastics","authors":"Juliane Veit, Michel Brinkschulte, Tobias Vogt","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70112","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejsc.70112","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Instructions are a common part of training in many sports. The content of the instructions and how they are formulated is relevant for the effect on performance. For motor learning and skill development, instructions that initiate an external focus of attention are predominantly described as beneficial in the literature. We assume that an instruction-guided attentional focus causes an effect on jump performance depending on whether the instruction matches the imagery type. Twenty-nine female participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.55 ± 3.01 years) with artistic gymnastics expertise (<i>M</i> = 11.38 ± 4.24 years) completed an online questionnaire, the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ-2) and performed stretched jumps with a 450° <i>longitudinal axis</i> (LA) turn in a laboratory setting. Crucial gymnastic-specific performance criteria such as jump height, body position and landing details were recorded and analysed. ANOVA results indicate no significant differences in performance between three instruction groups. Results of linear mixed models analyses show differences between baseline performance and the instruction phases for five variables. There seems to be a disruptive effect on performance when attention is consciously directed. The effect of an instruction-guided attentional focus on performance appears to be independent of the imagery type.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717018/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James Brown, Marc Douglas, Ben Hester, Manish Mohan, Sharief Hendricks, Brady Wiseman, Matthew Boshoff, Stephanie Phillips, Michael Bromfield, Amy Howard, Lindsay Starling, Ben Jones, Ross Tucker
There is no empirical evidence that soft-padded headgear is protective against head injury risk in rugby. However, studies that have assessed purported protective effects have not accounted for rates of contact. The aim of this study was to compare head injury rates while considering tackle-event exposure in players with and without headgear. In the 2018 and 2019 professional men's SuperRugby season, video analysts recorded headgear use, playing position, match time and head injury assessments (proxy for head injury risk) for each player. Tackle-event involvements for each player were obtained from third-party video analysis provider. Tackle-related head injury rates were calculated per 1000 h (incidence) and per 1000 tackle-events (propensity), and compared between headgear and non-headgear wearers using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals and Poisson regression models. Players wearing headgear were involved in more tackles per match than players without headgear (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05–1.09). Head injury incidence (IRR: 1.78 95% CI: 1.11–2.70) and propensity (IRR: 1.66 95% CI: 1.04–2.52) were higher in players wearing headgear. However, statistical models found no difference in this risk between positional groups. A lack of protective effect is consistent with previous studies and could be explained by World Rugby's headgear design regulations while increased risk may be a result of greater injury susceptibility. As World Rugby's headgear regulations change and further advancements in headgear is made, it is important to continue to examine their effect on head injury risk at an individual level.
{"title":"Wearing Regulation Soft-Padded Headgear Does Not Reduce the Risk of Head Injuries in Professional Men's Rugby Players: An Observational Cohort Study","authors":"James Brown, Marc Douglas, Ben Hester, Manish Mohan, Sharief Hendricks, Brady Wiseman, Matthew Boshoff, Stephanie Phillips, Michael Bromfield, Amy Howard, Lindsay Starling, Ben Jones, Ross Tucker","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70105","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejsc.70105","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is no empirical evidence that soft-padded headgear is protective against head injury risk in rugby. However, studies that have assessed purported protective effects have not accounted for rates of contact. The aim of this study was to compare head injury rates while considering tackle-event exposure in players with and without headgear. In the 2018 and 2019 professional men's SuperRugby season, video analysts recorded headgear use, playing position, match time and head injury assessments (proxy for head injury risk) for each player. Tackle-event involvements for each player were obtained from third-party video analysis provider. Tackle-related head injury rates were calculated per 1000 h (incidence) and per 1000 tackle-events (propensity), and compared between headgear and non-headgear wearers using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals and Poisson regression models. Players wearing headgear were involved in more tackles per match than players without headgear (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05–1.09). Head injury incidence (IRR: 1.78 95% CI: 1.11–2.70) and propensity (IRR: 1.66 95% CI: 1.04–2.52) were higher in players wearing headgear. However, statistical models found no difference in this risk between positional groups. A lack of protective effect is consistent with previous studies and could be explained by World Rugby's headgear design regulations while increased risk may be a result of greater injury susceptibility. As World Rugby's headgear regulations change and further advancements in headgear is made, it is important to continue to examine their effect on head injury risk at an individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717021/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}