Injury最新文献

Introduction: In city hospitals, subway-related traumatic amputations are a frequent pattern of injury, however there is a paucity of literature on this specific injury pattern. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of subway-related traumatic amputations, as well as compare them to non-subway traumatic amputations.

Patients and methods: Retrospective review was performed at a single Level-1 trauma center in a metropolitan area. All patients who sustained a traumatic lower-extremity amputation over a seven-year period were included. Demographics, injury, treatment-related information, and complications were collected. Subway and non-subway traumatic amputations were statistically compared. Cohorts were further subdivided into above-knee amputations (AKAs) and below-knee amputations (BKAs) for statistical comparison.

Results: Fifty-seven patients sustained 72 traumatic lower-extremity amputations, including 64 subway-related amputations. Fifteen patients with bilateral lower-extremity amputations all had subway-related injuries. Patients with subway-related injuries were more likely to have a history of alcohol use disorder (58.1 % vs. 0 %; P = 0.002), and experienced longer stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) (8.9 vs. 3.6 days; P = 0.006). Twenty-four amputations (33.3 %) were complicated by wound infection during the initial hospitalization, with wound cultures growing a variety of organisms, most frequently Enterococcus species and Enterobacter cloacae. When subway injuries were separated by AKAs and BKAs, patients with AKAs underwent more irrigation and debridement procedures on average (10.3 vs. 5.8; P = 0.006), had a higher rate of wound infections (58.8 % vs. 25.0 %; P = 0.018), and had longer hospital stays (50.4 vs. 32.2 days; P = 0.047).

Conclusion: Subway-related amputations are associated with longer ICU stays and a history of alcohol use disorder compared to non-subway traumatic amputations. Approximately 1/3 of these patients are expected to develop a wound infection, with Enterococcus and Enterobacter species being the most commonly identified organisms. Further research into high-energy, traumatic amputations, including subway injuries, may help improve prognostication of patient outcomes, identify potential in-hospital complications, and proactively direct differences in care compared to the standard for non-subway-related amputations.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III.

Purpose: We described clinical outcomes for patients with blunt splenic injuries treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) based on their hemodynamic status.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective two-center study of adult patients with splenic injuries who underwent emergency TAE between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; hemodynamically unstable (HDU) and hemodynamically stable (HDS) patients. HDU patients were defined as transient- or non-responders to fluid resuscitation and HDS as responders. When immediate laparotomy was not possible for HDU patients, angiography and embolization were performed. The primary outcome was the survival discharge rate. Rebleeding and splenectomy rate was also investigated.

Results: Of 38 patients underwent emergency TAE for splenic trauma, 17 were HDU patients and 21 were HDS patients. The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU- and 100 % in HDS patients (p = 0.193). Rebleeding rate was 23.5 % (4/17) in HDU- and 5.0 % (1/21) in HDS patients (p = 0.15). Splenectomy was required for one HDU patient (5.9 %) for rebleeding.

Conclusion: The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy. Further comparative studies of TAE versus operative management in HDU patients are needed to prove the usefulness of TAE.

Background: Occupational injuries impose a substantial global burden, affecting millions of workers annually, which demands urgent attention to enhance workplace safety and health standards. We aimed to outline the frequency, patterns of injury, and clinical characteristics of patients injured by high-rotation cutting tools (grinders) and to pinpoint the neurovascular (nerves and blood vessels) injuries.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted and included all adult patients hospitalized because of grinder-related injuries at the only level I Trauma Center in the country. The characteristics of patients, mechanism of injury, management and outcomes were analyzed based on the anatomical location of injuries.

Results: 127 patients were hospitalized with grinder-related injuries over ten years. The incidence of GRIs showed an increasing trend over the years. All patients were males with a mean (SD) age of 34.9 (9.8) years. The majority were general laborers (66.1 %), injured by portable grinders (86.6 %), and direct blade contact (64.6 %). The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 5.0(IQR 4.0-9.0), and the median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at ED was 15 (3-15). The most frequently injured part was the upper extremity (36.2 %), followed by the lower extremity (33.9 %) and the face (27.6 %). One-third of cases had vascular injuries, and 23.6 % had nerve injuries. Suturing was done for all patients; repairs and debridements were performed in 62 % and 58 % of cases, respectively, and 21 % required vascular surgery. Amputations were required in 9.4 % of cases. Thirty patients had nerve injuries involving the median (11 %) and radial (9.4 %) nerves. Among patients who had neurovascular injuries, 30 % (12/40) experienced complications during the hospital stay, while 60 % (24/40) ended up with physical disabilities.

Conclusion: Individuals affected by power-tool accidents were predominantly young males, mainly general laborers, with a significant proportion being expatriates. The trend of grinder-related injuries increases over time, with portable grinders being a primary source of injuries due to direct contact with the blade. The anatomical injuries mainly include fractures of the upper and lower extremities. Further studies are warranted to understand the cultural aspects and training requirements of workers handling power tools, aiming to achieve sustainable injury prevention effectively.

Introduction: The Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines (ATLS; 2018, 10th ed.) recommend an early and liberal supplemental oxygen for all severely injured trauma patients to prevent hypoxaemia. As of 2024, these guidelines remain the most current. This may lead to hyperoxaemia, which has been associated with increased mortality and respiratory complications. We aimed to investigate the attitudes among clinicians, defined as physicians and prehospital personnel, towards the use of supplemental oxygen in trauma cases.

Materials and methods: A European, web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted consisting of 23 questions. The primary outcome was the question: "In your opinion, should all severely injured trauma patients always be given supplemental oxygen, regardless of arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry?".

Results: The survey was answered by 707 respondents, which corresponded to a response rate of 52 %. The respondents were predominantly male (76 %), with the largest representation from Denmark (82 %), and primarily educated as physicians (62 %). A majority of respondents (73 % [95 % CI: 70 to 76 %]) did not support that supplemental oxygen should always be provided to all severely injured trauma patients without consideration of their arterial oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO₂), with no significant difference between physicians and non-physicians (p = 0.08). Based on the respondents' preferred dosages, the median initial administered dosage of supplemental oxygen for spontaneously breathing trauma patients with a normal SpO₂ in the first few hours after trauma was 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-3) litres per minute, with 58 % of respondents opting not to provide any supplemental oxygen. The lowest acceptable SpO₂ goal in the first few hours after trauma was 94 % (IQR 92-95). In clinical scenarios with TBI, higher dosage of supplemental oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) were preferred, as well as targeting partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood as opposed to adjusting the FiO₂ directly, compared to no TBI.

Conclusion: Almost three out of four clinicians did not support the administration of supplemental oxygen to all severely injured trauma patients, regardless of SpO₂. This corresponds to a more restrictive approach than recommended in the current ATLS (2018, 10th ed.) guidelines.

Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been demonstrated to improve early clinical outcomes. Tube thoracostomy (TT) is commonly performed with SSRF, however there is a paucity of data regarding when removal of TT following SSRF should occur. This study aimed to compare patients undergoing thoracic reinterventions (reintubation, reinsertion of TT/pigtail, or video-assisted thoracic surgery) to those not following SSRF+TT, hypothesizing increased TT output prior to removal would be associated with thoracic reintervention.

Methods: We performed a single center retrospective (2018-2023) analysis of blunt trauma patients ≥ 18 years-old undergoing SSRF+TT. The primary outcome was thoracic reinterventions. Patients undergoing thoracic reintervention ((+)thoracic reinterventions) after TT removal were compared to those who did not ((-)thoracic reintervention). Secondary outcomes included TT duration and outputs prior to removal.

Results: From 133 blunt trauma patients undergoing SSRF+TT, 23 (17.3 %) required thoracic reinterventions. Both groups were of comparable age. The (+)thoracic reintervention group had an increased injury severity score (median: 29 vs. 17, p = 0.035) and TT duration (median: 4 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) following SSRF. However, there were no differences in median TT outputs between both cohorts post-SSRF day 1 (165 mL vs. 160 mL, p = 0.88) as well as within 24 h (60 mL vs. 70 mL, p = 0.93) prior to TT removal.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated over 17 % of SSRF+TT patients required a thoracic reintervention. There was no association between thoracic reintervention and the TT output prior to removal. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings, which suggest no absolute threshold for TT output should be utilized regarding when to pull TT following SSRF.

Background: The present study investigated an institutional multidisciplinary strategy for managing traumatic haemorrhagic shock by integrating the placement of REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) by anaesthesiologist-intensivists.

Methods: All severe trauma patients who received percutaneous REBOA placement between January 2013 and December 2022 in our level 1 trauma centre were retrospectively analysed. The data collected included the clinical context, indications and location of REBOA, durations of aortic occlusion (AO), choice of haemostatic procedures and surgical teams, and specific complications.

Results: In total, 38 trauma patients were included in the present study (mean age = 41 years [standard deviation = 21 years], 31 [82 %] were male, and median injury severity score was 62.5 [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 45-75]). REBOA was always placed by anaesthesiologist-intensivists, who comprised 68 % of the senior physicians (13/19) in our trauma team over the period. Twenty-eight AOs (74 %) were performed in zone 1 and 10 (26 %) in zone 3. Twelve patients (32 %) received REBOA upon circulatory arrest. Routes following REBOA placement comprised: computed tomography scan = 47 %, operating room = 34 %, angiography = 3 %, emergency room thoracotomy = 5 %, and prematurely died = 11 %. Duration of AO was 38 min (IQR = 32-44 min) in zone 1 and 78 min (IQR = 48-112 min) in zone 3. Mortality rate was 66 % (95 % CI 51-81 %) and higher in cases of AO in zone 1 (79 % versus 30 %, p = 0.018) or concomitant with circulatory arrest (92 % versus 54 %, p = 0.047). No ischemic limb needed an intervention and three endothelial injuries required delayed endovascular stenting.

Conclusions: Percutaneous REBOA placement by anaesthesiologist-intensivists included in the multidisciplinary management of traumatic haemorrhagic shock was associated with acceptable time of AO and local complications similar to those observed in other series.

Background: There is no standardised definition of what constitutes a junctional injury. Although well described in military literature, this is not the case in the civilian setting. This study aims to characterise the epidemiology of the civilian penetrating junctional injuries in our centre.

Methods: A retrospective study of all adult and paediatric patients with penetrating injuries to a junctional area presenting to an urban Major Trauma Centre over one year. Data on site of injury, imaging, theatre utilisation, management, and cost was extracted. Differences between patients with injuries to the neck, axillae, diaphragm, groins, buttocks, and multiple injuries, were tested using chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests.

Results: Penetrating junctional injuries represented 27 % of all penetrating injuries (132/487). Most patients were young males presenting outside of the hours of 0800-1700. Injuries to the buttocks were most common (n = 50, 38 %) but carried the lowest median ISS of 8. Junctional injuries were very resource intensive utilising 384 images and 183 blood products in just 132 patients. 60 patients required surgical management. In one year, 418 ward-days and 50 ITU-days were required, with an approximated total cost of £914,076. Statistically: significant findings include that the youngest patients presented 1700 - 2000 (p < 0.001). Patients with diaphragm injuries had significantly higher ISS (p < 0.001), received more operations (p < 0.001), stayed on the ward longer (p = 0.002) and were more costly than the other anatomical areas (p < 0.001). Of the areas found adjoining an extremity to the torso, patients with groin injuries had significantly higher ISS (p = 0.025) and were more costly (p = 0.018).

Conclusion: Junctional injuries are common and carry a high resource burden. Patients with injuries to the neck, axillae, groin, and buttocks were similar in demographics, resource requirement and cost, although groin injured patients had higher median ISS and cost. Diaphragmatic injuries share some characteristics of junctional injuries, but had significantly higher ISS, blood product use, number of operations, ward length of stay, and cost. The authors support a narrower definition of 'junctional' to exclude diaphragm, such as 'locations adjoining the extremities to the torso'.

Introduction: Older patients are expected to comprise 40 % of trauma admissions in the next 30 years. The use of whole blood (WB) has shown promise in improving mortality while lowering the utilization of blood products. However, the use of WB in older trauma patients has not been examined. The objective of our study is to determine the safety and efficacy of a WB first transfusion strategy in injured older patients.

Methods: Older trauma patients, defined as age ≥55 years old, were reviewed from March 2016-November 2021. Patients that received a WB first resuscitation strategy were compared to those that received a ratio based component strategy. Demographics as well as complications rates, blood product transfusion volumes, and mortality were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of mortality.

Results: There were 388 older trauma patients that received any blood products during the study period. A majority of patients received a WB first resuscitation strategy (83 %). Compared to patients that received component therapy, patients that received WB first were more likely female, less likely to have a penetrating mechanism, and had a slightly lower injury severity score. The-30 day mortality rate was comparable (WB 36% vs component 37 %, p = 0.914). While rates of AKI were slightly higher in those that received WB, this did not result in increased rates of renal replacement therapy (3 % vs 2 %, p = 1). Further, compared to patients that received components, patients that were resuscitated with a WB first strategy significantly utilized lower median volumes of platelets (0 mL vs 197 mL, p < 0.001), median volumes of plasma (0 mL vs 1253 mL, p < 0.001, and median total volume of blood products (1000 mL vs 2859 mL, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of WB in the older trauma patient appears safe, with mortality and complication rates comparable to component therapy. Blood product utilization is significantly less in those that are resuscitated with WB first.

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to assess common sites of injury and the associated imaging findings in penetrating injuries. We pay particular attention to gluteal, anterior abdominal wall and junctional zone injuries. The aim is to highlight areas of diagnostic uncertainty and discrepancy between imaging and surgical findings, to improve review areas in trauma reporting.

Methods: A retrospective, observational study reviewing all paediatric admissions to the emergency department of a major trauma Centre with a penetrating injury, from 2015 to 2019.

Results: Gluteal penetrating injuries are by far the most commonly sustained injury in the adolescent population, making up over 1/3 of cases. The vast majority of these cases sustained superficial injuries or shallow intramuscular haematomas, however in a small group (15%), serious vascular or rectal injuries were demonstrated on dual phase CT, requiring emergent surgical or endovascular treatment. Penetrating injuries to the anterior abdominal wall and junctional zone are less common but are associated with higher morbidity, with 43% of cases demonstrating solid organ or bowel injury. These cases also lead to an increased degree of diagnostic uncertainty.

Conclusion: Gluteal injuries are common and although the overall morbidity of these cases is low, these patients are at risk of serious and life threatening consequences such as vascular and rectal injury and it is imperative that these complications are considered and ruled out via dual phase CT or direct visualization. Anterior abdominal wall and junctional zone injuries are less common, but lead to greater morbidity and also greater diagnostic uncertainty. The use of other salient findings as described in this report can aid diagnostic accuracy and reduce discrepancies.

Background: There is a global surge in blast injuries, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. To our knowledge, there are no guidelines for the management of blast injuries in the trauma bay.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study utilized data on all patients admitted to our emergency department (ED) with terror- or combat-related injuries between October 7, 2023 (Gaza Iron Swords War onset) and February 4, 2024. The primary outcome was trauma severity indicated by either an injury severity score (ISS) >15 and/or need for acute care. We also analyzed the mechanisms of injuries, focusing on those resulting from blasts.

Results: Of 208 patients who were admitted following terror-and combat related injuries, 109 patients (101 males [93 %], median age 24.0 years) were admitted following blast injuries. Of them, 88 % were military personnel and 12 % were civilians, with a median ISS of 8 [IQR:4.0-17.0]. The level of trauma was severe in 48 patients (44 %). Tertiary sub-category of blast injuries (P =0.004), chest (P =0.032), abdomen (P =0.018), and lower extremities (P =0.044) injuries were significantly associated with severe trauma. Blast injuries mandated the urgent availability of specialist personnel and appropriate equipment to contend with multiple life-threatening sequelae of exposure to blasts upon the arrival of the victims to emergency services.

Conclusion: Blast injuries present unique challenges in management and demand a multidisciplinary approach and specialized resources. We present an algorithm for terror- and combat-related blast injuries treated in our trauma bay. The step-by-step procedures may be applicable to any blast injury sustained under variable conditions.