More than 20 years ago, it has been suggested that some people are so obsessed with eating healthily that this may even be considered a new type of disordered eating, so-called orthorexia nervosa (ON; Bratman, 1997; Bratman & Knight, 2000). Features of ON that most experts in the field agree upon are that persons (1) have a subjective definition of healthy or “pure” eating based on a dietary theory or set of beliefs; (2) have a strong preoccupation with their eating behavior and self-imposed rigid rules which include spending an excessive amount of time for planning, obtaining, preparing, or eating the food; and (3) that these behaviors lead to a nutritionally unbalanced diet that negatively affects physical and mental health (Donini et al., 2022).
Although this agreement exists, the concept of ON is still controversially discussed among scientists and clinicians. Specifically, while there are persons who are noticeably obsessed with eating healthily, it is unclear whether this can also result in a condition that is clinically relevant, that is, needs to be treated medically or psychotherapeutically, and if there is such a condition, if it is a condition that is distinct from established eating disorders. For example, it has been argued that such cases can rarely been found and that most cases who show clinically relevant orthorexic tendencies would also fulfill the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa (Bhattacharya et al., 2022; Meule & Voderholzer, 2021). Because of this, it is all the more important that there are standardized and psychometrically sound assessment methods for orthorexic symptomatology to learn more about the prevalence and correlates of ON and its overlaps with and distinctiveness from other eating disorders.
Bratman and Knight (2000) described 10 tentative criteria for ON, which were intended as a self-test, that is, readers should decide for themselves whether each criterion applied to them or not. Although not developed as standardized, scientific measures, it has since been used in studies on ON as a self-report questionnaire with some researchers denoting it as Bratman's Orthorexia Test (BOT; Missbach et al., 2017). Yet, Missbach et al. (2017) also advised against using the BOT because of unknown psychometric properties and inconsistent use (e.g., different response scales and scoring) across studies.
The first standardized questionnaire that was developed for research purposes was the ORTO–15 (Donini et al., 2005). The ORTO–15 has since been used in numerous studies and has been translated in numerous languages (Oberle & Noebel, 2023). However, most of these studies consistently showed that the ORTO–15 is an unreliable and invalid measure. That is, internal reliability usually is unacceptable and one-factor models of all 15 items usually have poor model fit