首页 > 最新文献

Mental health science最新文献

英文 中文
Progress in research on orthorexia nervosa is still hampered by the use of the ORTO–15 and its modifications ORTO-15及其修饰物的使用仍然阻碍了神经性正性厌食症的研究进展
Pub Date : 2023-07-02 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.29
Adrian Meule

More than 20 years ago, it has been suggested that some people are so obsessed with eating healthily that this may even be considered a new type of disordered eating, so-called orthorexia nervosa (ON; Bratman, 1997; Bratman & Knight, 2000). Features of ON that most experts in the field agree upon are that persons (1) have a subjective definition of healthy or “pure” eating based on a dietary theory or set of beliefs; (2) have a strong preoccupation with their eating behavior and self-imposed rigid rules which include spending an excessive amount of time for planning, obtaining, preparing, or eating the food; and (3) that these behaviors lead to a nutritionally unbalanced diet that negatively affects physical and mental health (Donini et al., 2022).

Although this agreement exists, the concept of ON is still controversially discussed among scientists and clinicians. Specifically, while there are persons who are noticeably obsessed with eating healthily, it is unclear whether this can also result in a condition that is clinically relevant, that is, needs to be treated medically or psychotherapeutically, and if there is such a condition, if it is a condition that is distinct from established eating disorders. For example, it has been argued that such cases can rarely been found and that most cases who show clinically relevant orthorexic tendencies would also fulfill the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa (Bhattacharya et al., 2022; Meule & Voderholzer, 2021). Because of this, it is all the more important that there are standardized and psychometrically sound assessment methods for orthorexic symptomatology to learn more about the prevalence and correlates of ON and its overlaps with and distinctiveness from other eating disorders.

Bratman and Knight (2000) described 10 tentative criteria for ON, which were intended as a self-test, that is, readers should decide for themselves whether each criterion applied to them or not. Although not developed as standardized, scientific measures, it has since been used in studies on ON as a self-report questionnaire with some researchers denoting it as Bratman's Orthorexia Test (BOT; Missbach et al., 2017). Yet, Missbach et al. (2017) also advised against using the BOT because of unknown psychometric properties and inconsistent use (e.g., different response scales and scoring) across studies.

The first standardized questionnaire that was developed for research purposes was the ORTO–15 (Donini et al., 2005). The ORTO–15 has since been used in numerous studies and has been translated in numerous languages (Oberle & Noebel, 2023). However, most of these studies consistently showed that the ORTO–15 is an unreliable and invalid measure. That is, internal reliability usually is unacceptable and one-factor models of all 15 items usually have poor model fit

20多年前,有人认为,有些人非常痴迷于健康饮食,这甚至可能被认为是一种新型的饮食紊乱,即所谓的神经性正性厌食症(ON;Bratman,1997;Bratman&Knight,2000)。该领域大多数专家一致认为,ON的特征是:人们(1)基于饮食理论或一系列信念,对健康或“纯”饮食有主观定义;(2) 强烈关注自己的饮食行为和自我强加的严格规则,包括花费大量时间计划、获取、准备或食用食物;以及(3)这些行为导致营养不平衡的饮食,对身心健康产生负面影响(Donini et al.,2022)。尽管存在这种一致性,但ON的概念在科学家和临床医生中仍存在争议。具体来说,虽然有些人明显痴迷于健康饮食,但尚不清楚这是否也会导致临床相关的疾病,即需要接受医学或心理治疗,以及是否存在这种疾病,是否是一种与既定饮食障碍不同的疾病。例如,有人认为,这种病例很少被发现,大多数表现出临床相关的正性厌食倾向的病例也符合神经性厌食症的诊断标准(Bhattacharya等人,2022;Meule和Voderholzer,2021)。正因为如此,更重要的是,有一种标准化的、心理测量学上健全的矫正性厌食症症状评估方法,以更多地了解ON的患病率和相关性,以及它与其他饮食障碍的重叠和区别。Bratman和Knight(2000)描述了ON的10个暂定标准,这些标准旨在进行自我测试,也就是说,读者应该自己决定每个标准是否适用于他们。尽管它不是标准化的、科学的测量方法,但后来在on的研究中被用作自我报告问卷,一些研究人员将其称为Bratman正交性测试(BOT;Missbach等人,2017)。然而,Missbach等人(2017)还建议不要使用BOT,因为研究中未知的心理测量特性和不一致的使用(例如,不同的反应量表和评分)。第一个为研究目的开发的标准化问卷是ORTO-15(Donini等人,2005)。此后,ORTO-15被用于许多研究,并被翻译成多种语言(Obele和Noebel,2023)。然而,这些研究中的大多数一致表明,ORTO-15是一个不可靠和无效的衡量标准。也就是说,内部可靠性通常是不可接受的,所有15个项目的单因素模型通常具有较差的模型拟合度(例如,Rogoza,2019),这表明不应计算所有15个项的总分,更不用说解释了。其中一个原因可能是它的评分程序,这是非常特殊的:而所有项目的答案都是4分制,1分 = 始终,2 = 经常,3 = 有时,4 = 从不,然后对某些项目进行反向编码(即1 = 4,2 = 3,3 = 2,4 = 1) ,有两个项目被重新编码为2 = 始终,4 = 经常,3 = 有时,1 = 从不的确一项研究表明,当量表评分不同时(即,当所有项目中只有两个被重新编码时;Meule等人,2020问题,研究人员已经删除了具有较差心理测量特性的项目。然而,这导致了ORTO-15的大量不同的修改版本,包括7-12个项目,以及最近的六个项目ORTO-R(Rogoza&Donini,2021)。不幸的是,这导致了关于on的令人困惑的文献,这些文献的发现是不可比较的。例如,Toti等人(2022)使用了ORTO–15,并在一项研究中额外分析了12、11、9、7和6项版本,显然不确定应该选择哪个版本。Lakritz等人(2022)使用了ORTO-15,但没有使用Donini等人提出的原始评分程序。(2005),但根据Meule等人报告的因素分析对项目进行评分。(2020)。当研究提供ON的患病率估计时,这些不一致性尤其重要,研究发现,使用ORTO–15及其衍生物的研究中,ON的发病率估计值高得不切实际,而且差异很大(例如,Aiello等人,2022;Bergonzi和Massarolo,2022;Kujawowicz等人,2022)。 因此,即使使用ORTO-15的简短形式或不同的评分程序,在内部可靠性和因子有效性方面也能带来更好的心理测量特性,但这并不意味着这会导致对ON的知识得到改善和增长,因为研究结果无法在不同的研究中积累。对ORTO-15的修订也没有解决某些项目缺乏内容有效性的问题。例如,即使是对ORTO-15的最新(也是最简短的)修订——ORTO-R(Rogoza&Donini,2021)——仍然包括一个项目“你认为只严格食用健康食品可以改善你的外表吗。然而,在最近一项针对该领域47名专家的研究中,93%的人同意这一说法,即与神经性厌食症相比,外表问题不是ON的核心(Donini et al.,2022),因此支持这一项目实际上是反对ON的存在。由于所有这些问题,Missbach等人(2017)几年前就认为,“翻译和调整现有的措施(BOT,ORTO-15)无助于我们对ON的了解,从而产生质量平平的额外发现”(第523页),应该开发评估ON的新工具。事实上,这是因为有几种替代ORTO-15的方法,如饮食习惯问卷(Gleaves等人,2013)、杜塞尔多夫Orthorexia量表(Barthels等人,2015)、Teruel Orthorexia量表(Barrada和Roncero,2018)、,或法国Orthorexia量表(Dajon et al.,2021)。虽然ORTO-15是所有问卷中最古老的,但可以理解的是,它是总体上使用最频繁的问卷(参见Oberle和Noebel,2023)。然而,根据多年来明确提出的反对使用ORTO-15的建议(Meule等人,2020;Missbach等人,20152017),现在可能使用其他问卷已经取代了ORTO-15。不幸的是,情况似乎并非如此。例如,在2022年发表在网络科学期刊上的71项研究中(图1),其中一半以上的研究使用了ORTO-15或其修改(图2;该分析所基于的所有研究列表可访问https://osf.io/mfud6)ORTO–15是一种不可靠且无效的矫正厌食症症状测量方法。通过删除项目或改变评分程序对该量表进行修订并不能解决这些问题,也无助于增加对ON知识的一致性文献。由于ORTO-15及其修改仍然是ON研究中最常用的衡量标准,似乎有必要重申其他人早些时候提出的建议:ORTO-15及其其他版本都不应用于on的研究。相反,应优先考虑过去10年中制定的替代措施。提交人声明没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Progress in research on orthorexia nervosa is still hampered by the use of the ORTO–15 and its modifications","authors":"Adrian Meule","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.29","url":null,"abstract":"<p>More than 20 years ago, it has been suggested that some people are so obsessed with eating healthily that this may even be considered a new type of disordered eating, so-called orthorexia nervosa (ON; Bratman, <span>1997</span>; Bratman &amp; Knight, <span>2000</span>). Features of ON that most experts in the field agree upon are that persons (1) have a subjective definition of healthy or “pure” eating based on a dietary theory or set of beliefs; (2) have a strong preoccupation with their eating behavior and self-imposed rigid rules which include spending an excessive amount of time for planning, obtaining, preparing, or eating the food; and (3) that these behaviors lead to a nutritionally unbalanced diet that negatively affects physical and mental health (Donini et al., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Although this agreement exists, the concept of ON is still controversially discussed among scientists and clinicians. Specifically, while there are persons who are noticeably obsessed with eating healthily, it is unclear whether this can also result in a condition that is clinically relevant, that is, needs to be treated medically or psychotherapeutically, and if there is such a condition, if it is a condition that is distinct from established eating disorders. For example, it has been argued that such cases can rarely been found and that most cases who show clinically relevant orthorexic tendencies would also fulfill the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa (Bhattacharya et al., <span>2022</span>; Meule &amp; Voderholzer, <span>2021</span>). Because of this, it is all the more important that there are standardized and psychometrically sound assessment methods for orthorexic symptomatology to learn more about the prevalence and correlates of ON and its overlaps with and distinctiveness from other eating disorders.</p><p>Bratman and Knight (<span>2000</span>) described 10 tentative criteria for ON, which were intended as a self-test, that is, readers should decide for themselves whether each criterion applied to them or not. Although not developed as standardized, scientific measures, it has since been used in studies on ON as a self-report questionnaire with some researchers denoting it as Bratman's Orthorexia Test (BOT; Missbach et al., <span>2017</span>). Yet, Missbach et al. (<span>2017</span>) also advised against using the BOT because of unknown psychometric properties and inconsistent use (e.g., different response scales and scoring) across studies.</p><p>The first standardized questionnaire that was developed for research purposes was the ORTO–15 (Donini et al., <span>2005</span>). The ORTO–15 has since been used in numerous studies and has been translated in numerous languages (Oberle &amp; Noebel, <span>2023</span>). However, most of these studies consistently showed that the ORTO–15 is an unreliable and invalid measure. That is, internal reliability usually is unacceptable and one-factor models of all 15 items usually have poor model fit","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"163-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.29","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50118159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Self-compassion facilitates responsiveness to existential threat: A brief report 自我同情促进对生存威胁的反应:一份简短的报告
Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.28
Zach Gerber, Lidar Gez, David Anaki

Terror management theory posits that validation of worldview and self-esteem are primary defense mechanisms in keeping mortal concerns at bay, although potentially leading to the devaluation of others. Self-compassion is considered a more inclusive defense mechanism. Drawing on preliminary research, we extended a previous investigation regarding the buffering role of self-compassion within the Terror management theory paradigm. We embedded within a dot-probe task a continuous death priming together with abstract and concrete threat images. We confirmed among 126 university students that following death priming, self-compassion facilitated attentional attraction toward concrete threat and avoidance of abstract threat. These findings demonstrate the contribution of self-compassion in coping simultaneously with different types of attentional threat and has potential to spawn future innovative research.

恐怖管理理论认为,世界观和自尊的验证是阻止致命担忧的主要防御机制,尽管可能会导致他人贬值。自我同情被认为是一种更具包容性的防御机制。在初步研究的基础上,我们扩展了之前关于自我同情在恐怖管理理论范式中的缓冲作用的调查。我们在一个点探测器任务中嵌入了一个连续的死亡启动,以及抽象和具体的威胁图像。我们在126名大学生中证实,在死亡引发后,自我同情促进了对具体威胁的注意力吸引和对抽象威胁的回避。这些发现证明了自我同情在同时应对不同类型的注意力威胁方面的贡献,并有可能催生未来的创新研究。
{"title":"Self-compassion facilitates responsiveness to existential threat: A brief report","authors":"Zach Gerber,&nbsp;Lidar Gez,&nbsp;David Anaki","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.28","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Terror management theory posits that validation of worldview and self-esteem are primary defense mechanisms in keeping mortal concerns at bay, although potentially leading to the devaluation of others. Self-compassion is considered a more inclusive defense mechanism. Drawing on preliminary research, we extended a previous investigation regarding the buffering role of self-compassion within the Terror management theory paradigm. We embedded within a dot-probe task a continuous death priming together with abstract and concrete threat images. We confirmed among 126 university students that following death priming, self-compassion facilitated attentional attraction toward concrete threat and avoidance of abstract threat. These findings demonstrate the contribution of self-compassion in coping simultaneously with different types of attentional threat and has potential to spawn future innovative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"157-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.28","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50145662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fostering resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic via a digital mental health intervention—A pilot study 通过数字心理健康干预培养新冠肺炎大流行期间的复原力——一项试点研究
Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.27
Jennifer K. Kulke, Barbara Nacke, Corinna Jacobi

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, mental health burden of university members sharply increased. Specific interventions to address pandemic-related psychological distress did not yet exist. Current studies show that digital interventions reduce this burden, the investigation of changes in resilience as an outcome is lacking in these studies though. We therefore developed and evaluated the internet- and mobile-based intervention “bounce” to foster resilience, reduce perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden among university members during the pandemic. The 8-week, unguided internet- and mobile-based intervention consists of one mandatory module promoting resilience and six optional modules on pandemic-related topics. The study was designed as a one-arm, longitudinal pilot study with a baseline and postintervention assessment and self-reported resilience, perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden as outcome measures. The use and acceptance of the intervention modules were recorded and analyzed. A total of 798 individuals were given access to the intervention (n = 70 employees, n = 728 students, M = 26.05 years, 71.8% women). Of these, 273 participants (34%) completed the postassessment. On average, participants logged on to the intervention platform four times and completed an average of 1.90 (SD = 1.64) modules. The intervention as a whole and all modules were well accepted by participants. Intention-to-treat analyses showed a significant increase in resilience (t = −4.69, p < 0.001, d = 0.23) and a significant reduction in perceived stress (t = 6.50, p < 0.001, d = 0.32), and psychological symptom burden (t = 3.59, p < 0.001, d = 0.18) from baseline to postintervention. This study demonstrates that digital interventions can be easily developed and used as means to reduce mental health burden in large populations during a pandemic. The need for randomized controlled trials with follow-up assessments to examine longer-term effects and revisions of the intervention to increase effectiveness and use are discussed.

在2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间,大学成员的心理健康负担急剧增加。目前还不存在解决与疫情相关的心理困扰的具体干预措施。目前的研究表明,数字干预可以减轻这一负担,但这些研究缺乏对恢复力变化的调查。因此,我们开发并评估了基于互联网和移动的干预“反弹”,以在疫情期间培养韧性,减少大学成员的感知压力和心理症状负担。为期8周的无指导互联网和移动干预包括一个促进恢复力的强制性模块和六个关于疫情相关主题的可选模块。该研究被设计为一项单臂纵向试点研究,以基线和干预后评估以及自我报告的恢复力、感知压力和心理症状负担作为结果衡量标准。记录并分析干预模块的使用和验收情况。共有798人接受了干预(n = 70名员工,n = 728名学生,M = 26.05岁,女性71.8%)。其中,273名参与者(34%)完成了后评估。参与者平均登录干预平台四次,平均完成1.90(SD = 1.64)模块。整个干预措施和所有模块都得到了与会者的认可。意向治疗分析显示,复原力显著增加(t = −4.69,p <; 0.001,d = 0.23)和感知压力的显著降低(t = 6.50,p <; 0.001,d = 0.32)和心理症状负担(t = 3.59,p <; 0.001,d = 0.18)。这项研究表明,在大流行期间,数字干预可以很容易地开发和使用,作为减轻大量人群心理健康负担的手段。讨论了随机对照试验和随访评估的必要性,以检查长期效果,并对干预措施进行了修订,以提高有效性和使用率。
{"title":"Fostering resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic via a digital mental health intervention—A pilot study","authors":"Jennifer K. Kulke,&nbsp;Barbara Nacke,&nbsp;Corinna Jacobi","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.27","url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, mental health burden of university members sharply increased. Specific interventions to address pandemic-related psychological distress did not yet exist. Current studies show that digital interventions reduce this burden, the investigation of changes in resilience as an outcome is lacking in these studies though. We therefore developed and evaluated the internet- and mobile-based intervention “bounce” to foster resilience, reduce perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden among university members during the pandemic. The 8-week, unguided internet- and mobile-based intervention consists of one mandatory module promoting resilience and six optional modules on pandemic-related topics. The study was designed as a one-arm, longitudinal pilot study with a baseline and postintervention assessment and self-reported resilience, perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden as outcome measures. The use and acceptance of the intervention modules were recorded and analyzed. A total of 798 individuals were given access to the intervention (<i>n</i> = 70 employees, <i>n</i> = 728 students, <i>M</i> = 26.05 years, 71.8% women). Of these, 273 participants (34%) completed the postassessment. On average, participants logged on to the intervention platform four times and completed an average of 1.90 (SD = 1.64) modules. The intervention as a whole and all modules were well accepted by participants. Intention-to-treat analyses showed a significant increase in resilience (<i>t</i> = −4.69, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.23) and a significant reduction in perceived stress (<i>t</i> = 6.50, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.32), and psychological symptom burden (<i>t</i> = 3.59, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.18) from baseline to postintervention. This study demonstrates that digital interventions can be easily developed and used as means to reduce mental health burden in large populations during a pandemic. The need for randomized controlled trials with follow-up assessments to examine longer-term effects and revisions of the intervention to increase effectiveness and use are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.27","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50153312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining adverse childhood experiences and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review 检查儿童不良经历和注意力缺陷/多动障碍:一项系统综述
Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.26
Magda Wojtara BS, Yusra Syeda, Heshwin Singh, Emaan Rana, Saleem Sabeer PharmD

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) comprise many dimensions of abuse and neglect in early development. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder that often begins in childhood. In this review, we investigated the associations between ACEs and ADHD in children. Specifically, the focus is to determine the extent of the relationship between ACE type, cumulative number, and ADHD severity. Furthermore, this study explored all aspects of the bidirectional nature of this relationship including how children with ADHD may experience greater ACEs and the potential contribution of confounding and mediating variables including comorbid conditions and resilience. Selected studies were published between January 2015 and January 2023 on PsychInfo, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. Selected studies included: (1) The main age group of the study was children; (2) The children had to have been diagnosed with or have parent-reported ADHD; and (3) The research must include ACE. Case studies and those not meeting the inclusion criteria were excluded from this review. Ultimately, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria, were included in this review, and were evaluated using the appropriate risk of bias assessment tools. These studies supported a positive association between ACEs and ADHD including cumulative quantity and select types of ACEs increasing ADHD severity. Previous literature has primarily utilized observational methodologies which prevent researchers from establishing if there are causal associations and if there is a temporal order to ACEs and ADHD development. This review also provides implications for future research.

儿童不良经历(ACE)包括早期发展中的虐待和忽视的许多方面。注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种常见的神经发育障碍,通常始于儿童时期。在这篇综述中,我们调查了儿童ACE与ADHD之间的关系。具体来说,重点是确定ACE类型、累积数量和ADHD严重程度之间的关系程度。此外,这项研究探讨了这种关系的双向性质的各个方面,包括多动症儿童如何经历更大的ACE,以及混杂和中介变量的潜在贡献,包括共病条件和恢复力。选定的研究于2015年1月至2023年1月发表在PsychInfo、Google Scholar、PubMed和Scopus上。选定的研究包括:(1)研究的主要年龄组是儿童;(2) 这些孩子必须被诊断出患有多动症或父母报告患有多动症;(3)研究必须包括ACE。病例研究和不符合纳入标准的病例研究被排除在本次审查之外。最终,43项研究符合纳入标准,被纳入本综述,并使用适当的偏倚风险评估工具进行评估。这些研究支持ACE与多动症之间的正相关,包括ACE的累积数量和选择类型会增加多动症的严重程度。先前的文献主要利用观察方法,阻止研究人员确定ACE和ADHD的发展是否存在因果关系以及是否存在时间顺序。这篇综述也为未来的研究提供了启示。
{"title":"Examining adverse childhood experiences and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review","authors":"Magda Wojtara BS,&nbsp;Yusra Syeda,&nbsp;Heshwin Singh,&nbsp;Emaan Rana,&nbsp;Saleem Sabeer PharmD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.26","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) comprise many dimensions of abuse and neglect in early development. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder that often begins in childhood. In this review, we investigated the associations between ACEs and ADHD in children. Specifically, the focus is to determine the extent of the relationship between ACE type, cumulative number, and ADHD severity. Furthermore, this study explored all aspects of the bidirectional nature of this relationship including how children with ADHD may experience greater ACEs and the potential contribution of confounding and mediating variables including comorbid conditions and resilience. Selected studies were published between January 2015 and January 2023 on PsychInfo, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. Selected studies included: (1) The main age group of the study was children; (2) The children had to have been diagnosed with or have parent-reported ADHD; and (3) The research must include ACE. Case studies and those not meeting the inclusion criteria were excluded from this review. Ultimately, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria, were included in this review, and were evaluated using the appropriate risk of bias assessment tools. These studies supported a positive association between ACEs and ADHD including cumulative quantity and select types of ACEs increasing ADHD severity. Previous literature has primarily utilized observational methodologies which prevent researchers from establishing if there are causal associations and if there is a temporal order to ACEs and ADHD development. This review also provides implications for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 2","pages":"104-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.26","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50138886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding PTSD among correctional workers in Manitoba, Canada: Key considerations of social variables 了解加拿大马尼托巴省管教人员的创伤后应激障碍:社会变量的主要考虑因素
Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.25
Laura McKendy PhD, Tamara Taillieu PhD, Matthew S. Johnston PhD, Rosemary Ricciardelli PhD, R. Nicholas Carleton PhD

Mounting evidence highlights the high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among correctional workers. The current analysis draws on survey response data to present a social profile of correctional workers in the province of Manitoba (n = 580), Canada, who screened positive for PTSD (n = 196). We examined demographic information, professional history information, and adverse work exposure experiences, as well as treatment and support patterns. The analysis was not intended to identify correlates of PTSD development among correctional workers, but did identify the characteristics, professional and personal situations, and treatment experiences of correctional workers who screened positive for PTSD. The results highlight the multidimensional nature of work stressors, the pronounced problem of work–life conflict, and variations in seeking supports and treatments. Generally, participants screening positive for PTSD reported higher exposure to potentially psychologically traumatic events, higher environmental or occupational stressors at work, and many had prior work experience as public safety personnel. Correctional workers who screened positive for PTSD appeared more likely to access mental health supports. Promoting proactive support seeking for mental health treatment may help to mitigate the severity, frequency, stigma, and length of mental health challenges among correctional workers.

越来越多的证据表明,管教人员中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患病率很高。目前的分析利用调查响应数据来呈现马尼托巴省惩教工作者的社会概况(n = 580),加拿大,PTSD筛查呈阳性(n = 196)。我们检查了人口统计信息、职业史信息、不良工作暴露经历以及治疗和支持模式。该分析并非旨在确定惩教人员中PTSD发展的相关性,而是确定了PTSD筛查呈阳性的惩教人员的特征、职业和个人情况以及治疗经历。研究结果突出了工作压力源的多维性、工作与生活冲突的突出问题以及寻求支持和治疗的差异。一般来说,PTSD筛查呈阳性的参与者报告说,他们更容易受到潜在的心理创伤事件的影响,工作中的环境或职业压力更大,而且许多人以前有公共安全人员的工作经验。PTSD筛查呈阳性的惩教人员似乎更有可能获得心理健康支持。促进寻求心理健康治疗的积极支持可能有助于减轻惩教人员心理健康挑战的严重性、频率、污名化和持续时间。
{"title":"Understanding PTSD among correctional workers in Manitoba, Canada: Key considerations of social variables","authors":"Laura McKendy PhD,&nbsp;Tamara Taillieu PhD,&nbsp;Matthew S. Johnston PhD,&nbsp;Rosemary Ricciardelli PhD,&nbsp;R. Nicholas Carleton PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.25","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mounting evidence highlights the high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among correctional workers. The current analysis draws on survey response data to present a social profile of correctional workers in the province of Manitoba (<i>n</i> = 580), Canada, who screened positive for PTSD (<i>n</i> = 196). We examined demographic information, professional history information, and adverse work exposure experiences, as well as treatment and support patterns. The analysis was not intended to identify correlates of PTSD development among correctional workers, but did identify the characteristics, professional and personal situations, and treatment experiences of correctional workers who screened positive for PTSD. The results highlight the multidimensional nature of work stressors, the pronounced problem of work–life conflict, and variations in seeking supports and treatments. Generally, participants screening positive for PTSD reported higher exposure to potentially psychologically traumatic events, higher environmental or occupational stressors at work, and many had prior work experience as public safety personnel. Correctional workers who screened positive for PTSD appeared more likely to access mental health supports. Promoting proactive support seeking for mental health treatment may help to mitigate the severity, frequency, stigma, and length of mental health challenges among correctional workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"136-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.25","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50137993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in reported levels of depression and anxiety among rural and urban populations during the COVID-19 pandemic 新冠肺炎大流行期间农村和城市人口抑郁症和焦虑症报告水平的变化
Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.24
Robin Danek PhD, MPH, Heather Taylor PhD, Katy Ellis Hilts PhD, MPH

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected nearly everyone, however experiences and perceptions of COVID have been different across rural and urban areas in the United States, including effects on mental health. The purpose of the current study is to examine changes in levels of reported anxiety and depression within rural and urban populations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we used a repeated cross-sectional study design including adults (age 18 or older) who were sampled in 2019 and 2020. We examined the relationship between worsening mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) and rurality, controlling for individual's demographic and health-related measures. Individuals living in an urban area were more likely to report worsening anxiety (28.8% vs. 23.0% p < 0.001) and use of mental health services (10.4% vs. 8.1% p = 0.054) in the previous 12 months than their rural counterparts. No significant differences were detected in the likelihood of reporting worsening depression, when comparing those living in rural versus urban areas. We found that individuals living in urban areas were more likely to report worsening anxiety than those living in rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban areas were affected earlier and more severely as early epicenters of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, which may have contributed to worsening anxiety among these populations as compared to rural populations. Additionally, our findings may reflect urban and rural population differences in the perception and/or enforcement of COVID-19 policies such as lockdown and social distancing policies.

新冠肺炎大流行几乎影响了所有人,但美国农村和城市地区对新冠肺炎的体验和看法有所不同,包括对心理健康的影响。本研究的目的是研究新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间美国农村和城市人口中报告的焦虑和抑郁水平的变化。使用国家健康访谈调查(NHIS),我们使用了一项重复的横断面研究设计,包括2019年和2020年采样的成年人(18岁或以上)。我们研究了心理健康结果恶化(抑郁和焦虑)与农村地区之间的关系,控制了个人的人口统计学和健康相关指标。生活在城市地区的人更有可能报告焦虑加剧(28.8%对23.0%p <; 0.001)和使用心理健康服务(10.4%vs.8.1%p = 0.054)。在比较生活在农村和城市地区的人时,没有发现报告抑郁症恶化的可能性有显著差异。我们发现,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,生活在城市地区的人比生活在农村地区的人更有可能报告焦虑加剧。城市地区作为美国新冠肺炎疫情的早期中心,受到的影响更早、更严重,与农村人口相比,这可能导致这些人口的焦虑加剧。此外,我们的研究结果可能反映了城市和农村人口在对新冠肺炎政策(如封锁和保持社交距离政策)的认知和/或执行方面的差异。
{"title":"Changes in reported levels of depression and anxiety among rural and urban populations during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Robin Danek PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Heather Taylor PhD,&nbsp;Katy Ellis Hilts PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.24","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has affected nearly everyone, however experiences and perceptions of COVID have been different across rural and urban areas in the United States, including effects on mental health. The purpose of the current study is to examine changes in levels of reported anxiety and depression within rural and urban populations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we used a repeated cross-sectional study design including adults (age 18 or older) who were sampled in 2019 and 2020. We examined the relationship between worsening mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) and rurality, controlling for individual's demographic and health-related measures. Individuals living in an urban area were more likely to report worsening anxiety (28.8% vs. 23.0% <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and use of mental health services (10.4% vs. 8.1% <i>p</i> = 0.054) in the previous 12 months than their rural counterparts. No significant differences were detected in the likelihood of reporting worsening depression, when comparing those living in rural versus urban areas. We found that individuals living in urban areas were more likely to report worsening anxiety than those living in rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban areas were affected earlier and more severely as early epicenters of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, which may have contributed to worsening anxiety among these populations as compared to rural populations. Additionally, our findings may reflect urban and rural population differences in the perception and/or enforcement of COVID-19 policies such as lockdown and social distancing policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.24","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50149968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Applying a theory of change approach to develop and pilot a universal mental health literacy curriculum for adolescents 应用变革理论方法开发和试行青少年普遍心理健康素养课程
Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.19
Anna Kagstrom, Laura Juríková, Ondřej Pešout, Benjamin Šimsa, Petr Winkler

Universal evidence-based prevention and promotion programs lack in availability and scalability for child and adolescent mental health in Central and Eastern Europe. This paper describes the process of applying the theory of change to plan, develop, and pilot a mental health literacy intervention in Czech schools. The process of using theory of change to develop a complex intervention for mental health literacy is described across three stages: formative development, piloting, and evaluation. The application of evidence-based intervention was discussed within 64 diverse stakeholder meetings and tested over 2 years of piloting. The resulting theory of change map is described in the context of consideration for modifications, revisions, and recommendations for successful implementation of the developed intervention. Continued monitoring and evaluation and a formal evaluation of the effectiveness of mental health literacy curriculum within the region will be essential before scale-up.

在中欧和东欧,普遍的循证预防和促进计划在儿童和青少年心理健康方面缺乏可用性和可扩展性。本文描述了应用变革理论在捷克学校规划、发展和试点心理健康素养干预的过程。利用变化理论制定心理健康素养复杂干预措施的过程分为三个阶段:形成性发展、试点和评估。在64次不同的利益攸关方会议上讨论了循证干预的应用,并在两年的试点中进行了测试。在考虑修改、修订和建议以成功实施制定的干预措施的背景下,描述了由此产生的变化图理论。在扩大之前,继续监测和评估以及对该地区心理健康扫盲课程的有效性进行正式评估至关重要。
{"title":"Applying a theory of change approach to develop and pilot a universal mental health literacy curriculum for adolescents","authors":"Anna Kagstrom,&nbsp;Laura Juríková,&nbsp;Ondřej Pešout,&nbsp;Benjamin Šimsa,&nbsp;Petr Winkler","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.19","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Universal evidence-based prevention and promotion programs lack in availability and scalability for child and adolescent mental health in Central and Eastern Europe. This paper describes the process of applying the theory of change to plan, develop, and pilot a mental health literacy intervention in Czech schools. The process of using theory of change to develop a complex intervention for mental health literacy is described across three stages: formative development, piloting, and evaluation. The application of evidence-based intervention was discussed within 64 diverse stakeholder meetings and tested over 2 years of piloting. The resulting theory of change map is described in the context of consideration for modifications, revisions, and recommendations for successful implementation of the developed intervention. Continued monitoring and evaluation and a formal evaluation of the effectiveness of mental health literacy curriculum within the region will be essential before scale-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 2","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.19","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50139581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) on a sample of students in Qatar 阿拉伯版Warwick-Edinburgh心理健康量表(WEMWBS)对卡塔尔学生样本的验证和心理测量特性
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.18
Noor Al-Wattary, Mohammad Mollazehi, Abdullah M. Al-Jubouri, Noof A. Al-Qahtani, Lolwa K. Jolo, Ahmed A. Badr, Mariah Arif, Nouran A. ElTantawi, Moza S. Al-Kuwari

The Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used tool to assess mental well-being and life satisfaction in various populations. However, the psychometric properties of the WEMWBS in Arabic-speaking populations have not been established. This study aimed to validate and assess the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the WEMWBS among adolescents. A rigorous translation process was conducted, and the scale was administered to 470 participants aged 13–18 years in Qatar. The data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and validity assessments. The results showed that the Arabic version of the WEMWBS had a unidimensional structure, with high factor loadings and good internal consistency. The findings suggest that the Arabic version of the WEMWBS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental well-being and life satisfaction among Arabic-speaking adolescents. These results can facilitate the use of the Arabic WEMWBS scale in different mental well-being studies that include Arabic-speaking populations.

沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)是一种广泛使用的工具,用于评估不同人群的心理健康和生活满意度。然而,阿拉伯语人群中WEMWBS的心理测量特性尚未确定。本研究旨在验证和评估阿拉伯语版WEMWBS在青少年中的心理测量特性。进行了严格的翻译过程,并对卡塔尔470名13-18岁的参与者进行了量表。使用探索性和验证性因素分析、内部一致性和有效性评估对数据进行分析。结果表明,阿拉伯版本的WEMWBS具有一维结构,具有高因子载荷和良好的内部一致性。研究结果表明,阿拉伯语版的WEMWBS是评估阿拉伯语青少年心理健康和生活满意度的有效和可靠的工具。这些结果有助于在包括阿拉伯语人群在内的不同心理健康研究中使用阿拉伯语WEMWBS量表。
{"title":"Validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) on a sample of students in Qatar","authors":"Noor Al-Wattary,&nbsp;Mohammad Mollazehi,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Al-Jubouri,&nbsp;Noof A. Al-Qahtani,&nbsp;Lolwa K. Jolo,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Badr,&nbsp;Mariah Arif,&nbsp;Nouran A. ElTantawi,&nbsp;Moza S. Al-Kuwari","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.18","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used tool to assess mental well-being and life satisfaction in various populations. However, the psychometric properties of the WEMWBS in Arabic-speaking populations have not been established. This study aimed to validate and assess the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the WEMWBS among adolescents. A rigorous translation process was conducted, and the scale was administered to 470 participants aged 13–18 years in Qatar. The data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and validity assessments. The results showed that the Arabic version of the WEMWBS had a unidimensional structure, with high factor loadings and good internal consistency. The findings suggest that the Arabic version of the WEMWBS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental well-being and life satisfaction among Arabic-speaking adolescents. These results can facilitate the use of the Arabic WEMWBS scale in different mental well-being studies that include Arabic-speaking populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 2","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.18","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50118768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Videoconference-led art-based interventions for children during COVID-19: Comparing mindful mandala and emotion-based drawings 新冠肺炎期间针对儿童的视频会议艺术干预:比较专注曼陀罗和基于情感的绘画
Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.17
Terra Léger-Goodes, Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise, Catherine M. Herba, Geneviève Taylor, Geneviève A. Mageau, Nicholas Chadi, David Lefrançois

Emerging evidence on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic suggests that children are experiencing a deterioration in mental health, namely, an increase in anxiety, depression, and hyperactivity symptoms. To address this rising issue, preventive strategies and mental health interventions need to be evaluated to help children in their school setting. Recent studies have suggested that art-based interventions could increase children's well-being and be easily implemented in schools. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of an emotion-based directed drawing intervention, compared to a mandala drawing intervention, on elementary school children's (n = 165) mental health, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. An experimental design was used to compare the effects of the two interventions on primary school students' anxiety, depression, and inattention symptoms. All drawing activities were led by an online facilitator, while children and teachers attended school in-person. Mixed analyses of variance revealed a significant effect of time on students' levels of anxiety. Post hoc sensitivity analyses indicated that children from both groups reported lower levels of anxiety pre- to postintervention. Results from this study showed that, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, both emotion-based and mandala drawing interventions could improve certain mental health aspects of elementary school children, by reducing their anxiety levels. Informal evidence indicates that implementing these interventions online and remotely through a videoconferencing platform is feasible and well received by children and their teachers. Nevertheless, future studies should include an inactive control group, explore the acceptability of the intervention, and use longitudinal methods to better document if the positive impacts on mental health can be maintained through time.

2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行的新证据表明,儿童的心理健康状况恶化,即焦虑、抑郁和多动症症状增加。为了解决这一日益严重的问题,需要评估预防策略和心理健康干预措施,以帮助儿童在学校环境中学习。最近的研究表明,基于艺术的干预措施可以提高儿童的幸福感,并且很容易在学校实施。本研究的目的是评估基于情绪的定向绘画干预与曼陀罗绘画干预对小学生(n = 165)新冠肺炎大流行背景下的心理健康。采用实验设计比较了两种干预措施对小学生焦虑、抑郁和注意力不集中症状的影响。所有绘画活动都由一名在线辅导员领导,孩子和老师亲自上学。混合方差分析显示,时间对学生的焦虑水平有显著影响。事后敏感性分析表明,两组儿童在干预前后的焦虑水平较低。这项研究的结果表明,在新冠肺炎大流行的背景下,基于情绪的干预和曼陀罗绘画干预都可以通过降低小学生的焦虑水平来改善他们的某些心理健康方面。非正式证据表明,通过视频会议平台在线和远程实施这些干预措施是可行的,并受到儿童及其教师的好评。然而,未来的研究应该包括一个不活跃的对照组,探索干预的可接受性,并使用纵向方法来更好地记录是否可以长期保持对心理健康的积极影响。
{"title":"Videoconference-led art-based interventions for children during COVID-19: Comparing mindful mandala and emotion-based drawings","authors":"Terra Léger-Goodes,&nbsp;Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise,&nbsp;Catherine M. Herba,&nbsp;Geneviève Taylor,&nbsp;Geneviève A. Mageau,&nbsp;Nicholas Chadi,&nbsp;David Lefrançois","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.17","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emerging evidence on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic suggests that children are experiencing a deterioration in mental health, namely, an increase in anxiety, depression, and hyperactivity symptoms. To address this rising issue, preventive strategies and mental health interventions need to be evaluated to help children in their school setting. Recent studies have suggested that art-based interventions could increase children's well-being and be easily implemented in schools. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of an emotion-based directed drawing intervention, compared to a mandala drawing intervention, on elementary school children's (<i>n</i> = 165) mental health, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. An experimental design was used to compare the effects of the two interventions on primary school students' anxiety, depression, and inattention symptoms. All drawing activities were led by an online facilitator, while children and teachers attended school in-person. Mixed analyses of variance revealed a significant effect of time on students' levels of anxiety. Post hoc sensitivity analyses indicated that children from both groups reported lower levels of anxiety pre- to postintervention. Results from this study showed that, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, both emotion-based and mandala drawing interventions could improve certain mental health aspects of elementary school children, by reducing their anxiety levels. Informal evidence indicates that implementing these interventions online and remotely through a videoconferencing platform is feasible and well received by children and their teachers. Nevertheless, future studies should include an inactive control group, explore the acceptability of the intervention, and use longitudinal methods to better document if the positive impacts on mental health can be maintained through time.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"118-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.17","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50143439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strong mind, strong body: The promise of mind–body interventions to address growing mental health needs among youth 强健的头脑,强健的身体:身心干预的承诺,以满足青年日益增长的心理健康需求。
Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI: 10.1002/mhs2.16
Lana Ruvolo Grasser, Hilary Marusak

As the prevalence of childhood and adolescent anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns continues to rise, there has been an unprecedented increase in support of mind–body practices like yoga, dance, meditation, mindfulness, aerobic exercise, and more—in part driven by the mental health burden imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. While a growing body of evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of mind–body approaches, gaps in funding for and empirical research on mechanistic underpinnings, methodology development to assess multicomponent therapeutic practices, dissemination and implementation, and diversity in researchers, practitioners, and recipients remain. As a consequence, the neurobiological impacts of mind–body techniques are not well understood nor broadly accepted as standard forms of care by clinicians and insurers—often being considered as “alternative” rather than “complementary” or “integrative.” In this commentary, we summarize work from our labs and others highlighting the promise of mind–body approaches for improving mental health in youth, in line with the National Institute of Mental Health's strategic plan to address health disparities. We offer a potential framework for implementation and research—the Expressive Therapies Continuum. We also propose solutions to key research and policy gaps, that by could have positive public health impacts for those who are struggling and to prevent emergence of psychiatric illness, especially in developing youth.

随着儿童和青少年焦虑、抑郁和其他心理健康问题的流行率持续上升,对瑜伽、舞蹈、冥想、正念、有氧运动等身心健康练习的支持空前增加,新冠肺炎疫情造成的心理健康负担也在一定程度上推动了这种支持。尽管越来越多的证据支持身心方法的安全性和有效性,但在机制基础的资金和实证研究、评估多成分治疗实践的方法开发、传播和实施以及研究人员、从业者和接受者的多样性方面仍然存在差距。因此,身心技术的神经生物学影响并没有被临床医生很好地理解,也没有被广泛接受为标准的护理形式,保险公司通常被认为是“替代”而不是“互补”或“综合”。在这篇评论中,我们总结了我们实验室和其他实验室的工作,强调了身心方法在改善青少年心理健康方面的前景,这符合国家心理健康研究所解决健康差距的战略计划。我们为表达治疗连续体的实施和研究提供了一个潜在的框架。我们还提出了解决关键研究和政策差距的方案,到那时,这些方案可能会对那些正在挣扎的人产生积极的公共卫生影响,并防止精神疾病的出现,特别是在发展中的年轻人中。
{"title":"Strong mind, strong body: The promise of mind–body interventions to address growing mental health needs among youth","authors":"Lana Ruvolo Grasser,&nbsp;Hilary Marusak","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.16","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.16","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the prevalence of childhood and adolescent anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns continues to rise, there has been an unprecedented increase in support of mind–body practices like yoga, dance, meditation, mindfulness, aerobic exercise, and more—in part driven by the mental health burden imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. While a growing body of evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of mind–body approaches, gaps in funding for and empirical research on mechanistic underpinnings, methodology development to assess multicomponent therapeutic practices, dissemination and implementation, and diversity in researchers, practitioners, and recipients remain. As a consequence, the neurobiological impacts of mind–body techniques are not well understood nor broadly accepted as standard forms of care by clinicians and insurers—often being considered as “alternative” rather than “complementary” or “integrative.” In this commentary, we summarize work from our labs and others highlighting the promise of mind–body approaches for improving mental health in youth, in line with the National Institute of Mental Health's strategic plan to address health disparities. We offer a potential framework for implementation and research—the Expressive Therapies Continuum. We also propose solutions to key research and policy gaps, that by could have positive public health impacts for those who are struggling and to prevent emergence of psychiatric illness, especially in developing youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 2","pages":"58-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.16","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41159367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Mental health science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1