Lea Vogel, Carmen Henning, Jörg Wolstein, Vickà Versele, Mireille N. M. Van Poppel, Kenneth Steppan, Teresa Schlossbach, Ansgar Opitz, Ulrike Lux, Johanna Löchner, Tanja Färber, Tom Deliens, Eva Boehlke, Caroline Seiferth
Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are a promising approach to promote mothers' and fathers' health in the perinatal period. This may be particularly true for psychosocially burdened families who are poorly reached by current preventive services. Studies are needed that examine how user-centered and evidence-based mHealth interventions look like for this target group. The objective of this paper is to describe the iterative development process of the I-PREGNO app intervention that aims to prevent unhealthy weight gain and to promote mental health in psychosocially burdened families during the perinatal period. The systematic content development process was divided into four stages. User needs were assessed through focus group discussions with psychosocially burdened mothers and healthcare professionals (HPs; stage I). In stage II, a prototype of the app was developed and evaluated through usability tests and a walkthrough with the target group and HPs (stage III). Finally, the behavior change techniques implemented in the app were assessed using an existing taxonomy (stage IV). The focus group discussions revealed that HPs as well as end-users would benefit from an intervention that addresses psychosocial aspects (i.e., emotion regulation, coping) and links these to health behaviors. The identified needs of the target group during the perinatal period were combined with existing evidence-based content and translated into 12 app modules. Most of the behavior change techniques used in these thematic modules were assigned to the clusters self-monitoring, knowledge building, and goal planning. The I-PREGNO app development process was guided by an iterative and user-centered approach involving the target audience and a multidisciplinary team of experts. The findings provide valuable implications for the design and development of evidence-based self-guided mHealth for hard-to-reach groups during the transition to parenthood. The efficacy of the I-PREGNO intervention will be evaluated in randomized controlled trials in routine care.
{"title":"User-centered development process of an evidence-based mHealth intervention for psychosocially burdened families during the transition to parenthood","authors":"Lea Vogel, Carmen Henning, Jörg Wolstein, Vickà Versele, Mireille N. M. Van Poppel, Kenneth Steppan, Teresa Schlossbach, Ansgar Opitz, Ulrike Lux, Johanna Löchner, Tanja Färber, Tom Deliens, Eva Boehlke, Caroline Seiferth","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.58","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.58","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are a promising approach to promote mothers' and fathers' health in the perinatal period. This may be particularly true for psychosocially burdened families who are poorly reached by current preventive services. Studies are needed that examine how user-centered and evidence-based mHealth interventions look like for this target group. The objective of this paper is to describe the iterative development process of the I-PREGNO app intervention that aims to prevent unhealthy weight gain and to promote mental health in psychosocially burdened families during the perinatal period. The systematic content development process was divided into four stages. User needs were assessed through focus group discussions with psychosocially burdened mothers and healthcare professionals (HPs; stage I). In stage II, a prototype of the app was developed and evaluated through usability tests and a walkthrough with the target group and HPs (stage III). Finally, the behavior change techniques implemented in the app were assessed using an existing taxonomy (stage IV). The focus group discussions revealed that HPs as well as end-users would benefit from an intervention that addresses psychosocial aspects (i.e., emotion regulation, coping) and links these to health behaviors. The identified needs of the target group during the perinatal period were combined with existing evidence-based content and translated into 12 app modules. Most of the behavior change techniques used in these thematic modules were assigned to the clusters self-monitoring, knowledge building, and goal planning. The I-PREGNO app development process was guided by an iterative and user-centered approach involving the target audience and a multidisciplinary team of experts. The findings provide valuable implications for the design and development of evidence-based self-guided mHealth for hard-to-reach groups during the transition to parenthood. The efficacy of the I-PREGNO intervention will be evaluated in randomized controlled trials in routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.58","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140255017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andreea Raslescu, Anutra Guru, Brennan Delattre, Jae-Young Park, Catherine J. Harmer, Susannah E. Murphy
Physical activity (PA) is understood to be important for the prevention and treatment of depression, however, less is known about the effects of withdrawal from PA on mood. Here we consider evidence published since the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PA patterns and to evaluate whether engagement in PA in the context of the pandemic had an impact on depression vulnerability. During the initial stages of the pandemic and consequent lockdowns, there were global decreases in PA, with women, ethnic minorities, lower-education, lower-income, younger, and elderly people displaying more marked reductions in PA. Less PA was associated with a higher risk of experiencing moderate-to-severe depression symptoms, particularly for those who decreased their PA levels compared to pre-pandemic. Both PA and sedentary behavior were independently associated with depression, such that low activity and high amounts of sitting both increased the likelihood of clinically significant symptoms. We also consider the role social connection during movement; while both in-person and online PA can foster a sense of belonging, there is some evidence that socially distant, pandemic-safe movement might disincentivise certain groups such as older adults and experienced exercisers from participating in PA. We conclude with several implications for prospective public health communications regarding PA, especially in the event of another global pandemic.
据了解,体育锻炼(PA)对于预防和治疗抑郁症非常重要,然而,人们对退出体育锻炼对情绪的影响却知之甚少。在此,我们考虑了自 SARS-CoV-2 病毒爆发以来发表的证据,以评估 COVID-19 大流行对 PA 模式的影响,并评估在大流行的背景下参与 PA 是否会对抑郁易感性产生影响。在大流行的最初阶段以及随后的封锁期间,全球范围内的业余爱好都有所减少,其中女性、少数民族、低学历者、低收入者、年轻人和老年人的业余爱好减少更为明显。较少的业余爱好与较高的中度至重度抑郁症状风险有关,尤其是那些业余爱好水平较疫情前有所下降的人群。活动量和久坐行为都与抑郁症有独立的关联,因此活动量少和久坐时间长都会增加出现明显临床症状的可能性。我们还考虑了社会联系在运动过程中的作用;虽然亲身运动和在线运动都能培养归属感,但有证据表明,远离社会、不受大流行影响的运动可能会抑制某些群体(如老年人和有经验的运动者)参与运动。最后,我们提出了未来公共卫生传播中有关体育锻炼的几点启示,尤其是在另一次全球大流行的情况下。
{"title":"Physical activity as a tool for preventing and treating depression: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Andreea Raslescu, Anutra Guru, Brennan Delattre, Jae-Young Park, Catherine J. Harmer, Susannah E. Murphy","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.57","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.57","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Physical activity (PA) is understood to be important for the prevention and treatment of depression, however, less is known about the effects of withdrawal from PA on mood. Here we consider evidence published since the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PA patterns and to evaluate whether engagement in PA in the context of the pandemic had an impact on depression vulnerability. During the initial stages of the pandemic and consequent lockdowns, there were global decreases in PA, with women, ethnic minorities, lower-education, lower-income, younger, and elderly people displaying more marked reductions in PA. Less PA was associated with a higher risk of experiencing moderate-to-severe depression symptoms, particularly for those who decreased their PA levels compared to pre-pandemic. Both PA and sedentary behavior were independently associated with depression, such that low activity and high amounts of sitting both increased the likelihood of clinically significant symptoms. We also consider the role social connection during movement; while both in-person and online PA can foster a sense of belonging, there is some evidence that socially distant, pandemic-safe movement might disincentivise certain groups such as older adults and experienced exercisers from participating in PA. We conclude with several implications for prospective public health communications regarding PA, especially in the event of another global pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.57","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140259880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mindfulness and self-regulation practice have shown benefits in reducing emotional disorders and improving cognitive outcomes. This study uses ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine time-lagged associations of momentary mindfulness and self-regulation on affective and cognitive outcomes within college students' natural environments. College students (n = 186) received six surveys per day for seven consecutive days in 2021, 2022, and 2023 using the Expiwell application. Each survey measured students' momentary affect, perceived cognition, mindfulness, and self-regulation levels. Due to nested data structure, multilevel models were used for analysis. Findings from 4982 EMA surveys revealed that higher levels of momentary mindfulness and self-regulation at one-time point were positively associated with perceived cognition (β = 0.102, p < 0.001; β = 0.054, p < 0.05) and positive affect (β = 0.061, p < 0.01; β = 0.057, p < 0.05), and negatively associated with negative affect (β = −0.023, p < 0.005; β = −0.019, p < 0.05) at the subsequent timepoints within a day, after controlling for between-person associations and other covariates. Higher states of momentary mindfulness and self-regulation were associated with enhanced affect and cognition at later timepoints within a day. Given these associations, targeting health interventions to induce more frequent practice of mindfulness and self-regulation in students' daily routines could be a potential way to improve their momentary affect and cognition.
正念和自我调节练习在减少情绪失调和改善认知结果方面有一定的益处。本研究采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来研究大学生在自然环境中的瞬时正念和自我调节对情感和认知结果的时滞关联。大学生(n = 186)在2021年、2022年和2023年连续七天每天使用Expiwell应用程序接受六次调查。每次调查都会测量学生的瞬间情绪、感知认知、正念和自我调节水平。由于数据结构存在嵌套,因此采用多层次模型进行分析。4982 份 EMA 调查结果显示,在一个时间点上,较高的瞬间正念和自我调节水平与感知认知(β = 0.102,p < 0.001;β = 0.054,p < 0.05)和积极情绪(β = 0.061, p < 0.01; β = 0.057, p < 0.05),而在控制了人与人之间的关联和其他协变量后,在一天内的后续时间点,与消极情绪负相关(β = -0.023, p < 0.005; β = -0.019, p < 0.05)。较高的瞬间正念和自我调节状态与一天内随后时间点的情感和认知增强有关。鉴于这些关联,有针对性地采取健康干预措施,促使学生在日常生活中更频繁地练习正念和自我调节,可能是改善其瞬间情绪和认知的一种潜在方法。
{"title":"Time-lagged associations of mindfulness and self-regulation with affect and cognition: An ecological momentary assessment study","authors":"Abhishek Aggarwal, Shang-Ti Chen, Jongwon Lee, Allison Tracy, Shan Qiao, Xiaoming Li, Chih-Hsiang Yang","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.55","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.55","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mindfulness and self-regulation practice have shown benefits in reducing emotional disorders and improving cognitive outcomes. This study uses ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine time-lagged associations of momentary mindfulness and self-regulation on affective and cognitive outcomes within college students' natural environments. College students (<i>n</i> = 186) received six surveys per day for seven consecutive days in 2021, 2022, and 2023 using the Expiwell application. Each survey measured students' momentary affect, perceived cognition, mindfulness, and self-regulation levels. Due to nested data structure, multilevel models were used for analysis. Findings from 4982 EMA surveys revealed that higher levels of momentary mindfulness and self-regulation at one-time point were positively associated with perceived cognition (<i>β</i> = 0.102, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>β</i> = 0.054, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and positive affect (<i>β</i> = 0.061, <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>β</i> = 0.057, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and negatively associated with negative affect (<i>β</i> = −0.023, <i>p</i> < 0.005; <i>β</i> = −0.019, <i>p</i> < 0.05) at the subsequent timepoints within a day, after controlling for between-person associations and other covariates. Higher states of momentary mindfulness and self-regulation were associated with enhanced affect and cognition at later timepoints within a day. Given these associations, targeting health interventions to induce more frequent practice of mindfulness and self-regulation in students' daily routines could be a potential way to improve their momentary affect and cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.55","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140078224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Experiencing stress can be associated with feeling and looking older. The goal of this study was to examine daily fluctuations in control beliefs as a potential moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and two indicators of subjective aging in younger adults. Data were collected from 107 younger adults between the ages of 18 and 36 (M = 19.96) who completed an online questionnaire via Qualtrics daily for 9 consecutive days. On Day 1, participants reported demographic information and on Days 2–9, participants reported their daily subjective ages (how old they felt and how old they looked), daily stressors, and perceptions of daily control beliefs. Results from multilevel models revealed that increases in daily stressors were associated with increases in both felt and look age. Although there was no main effect of control beliefs, control beliefs did function as a moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and felt age as well as between daily stressors and look age. Specifically, the aging effect of daily stressors was not significant on days with increases in control beliefs. These results suggest that young adults feel and look older on days when they experience higher levels of stressors and that increases in perceptions of control help to mitigate this effect.
{"title":"The effect of control beliefs on the relationship between daily stressors and subjective age in younger adults","authors":"Sofia E. Lee, Shevaun D. Neupert","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.56","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.56","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Experiencing stress can be associated with feeling and looking older. The goal of this study was to examine daily fluctuations in control beliefs as a potential moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and two indicators of subjective aging in younger adults. Data were collected from 107 younger adults between the ages of 18 and 36 (<i>M</i> = 19.96) who completed an online questionnaire via Qualtrics daily for 9 consecutive days. On Day 1, participants reported demographic information and on Days 2–9, participants reported their daily subjective ages (how old they felt and how old they looked), daily stressors, and perceptions of daily control beliefs. Results from multilevel models revealed that increases in daily stressors were associated with increases in both felt and look age. Although there was no main effect of control beliefs, control beliefs did function as a moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and felt age as well as between daily stressors and look age. Specifically, the aging effect of daily stressors was not significant on days with increases in control beliefs. These results suggest that young adults feel and look older on days when they experience higher levels of stressors and that increases in perceptions of control help to mitigate this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.56","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140088178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xing Yao, Erik J. Nelson, Kostas Stavrianakis, T. Huang, Casey Moran, Patrick C. Shih, Evan J. Jordan
Despite the importance of daily stress to individuals' health and wellbeing, few studies have explored where stress happens in real time, that is, dynamic stress processes in different spaces. As such, stress interventions rarely account for the environment in which stress occurs. We used mobile phone based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect daily stress data. Thirty‐three participants utilized a mobile‐phone‐based EMA app to self‐report stressors as they went about their daily lives. Geographic coordinates were automatically collected with each stress report. Data from thematic analysis of stressors by location (home, work, work from home, other) were used to determine whether certain stressors were more prevalent in certain environments. Nine daily stressors significantly differed by location. Work‐related stress was reported more often at work. Pets, household chores, sleep, and media‐related stressors were reported most at home. Physical illnesses, vehicle issues, and safety/security stressors occurred most often while participants were “working from home.” Traffic‐related stress was experienced more commonly in “other” environments. Other 18 stressors were generated regardless of location, suggesting that these stressors were persistent and without respect to location. Study findings expand the understanding of environments in which specific stressors occur, providing baseline data for potential targeted “just‐in‐time” stress interventions tailored to unique stressors in specific environments. We also provide findings related to the “work from home” phenomenon. Further work is needed to better understand the unique stressors among the large number of individuals who transitioned to working from home during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic.
{"title":"Where does stress happen? Ecological momentary assessment of daily stressors using a mobile phone app","authors":"Xing Yao, Erik J. Nelson, Kostas Stavrianakis, T. Huang, Casey Moran, Patrick C. Shih, Evan J. Jordan","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.54","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.54","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the importance of daily stress to individuals' health and wellbeing, few studies have explored where stress happens in real time, that is, dynamic stress processes in different spaces. As such, stress interventions rarely account for the environment in which stress occurs. We used mobile phone based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect daily stress data. Thirty‐three participants utilized a mobile‐phone‐based EMA app to self‐report stressors as they went about their daily lives. Geographic coordinates were automatically collected with each stress report. Data from thematic analysis of stressors by location (home, work, work from home, other) were used to determine whether certain stressors were more prevalent in certain environments. Nine daily stressors significantly differed by location. Work‐related stress was reported more often at work. Pets, household chores, sleep, and media‐related stressors were reported most at home. Physical illnesses, vehicle issues, and safety/security stressors occurred most often while participants were “working from home.” Traffic‐related stress was experienced more commonly in “other” environments. Other 18 stressors were generated regardless of location, suggesting that these stressors were persistent and without respect to location. Study findings expand the understanding of environments in which specific stressors occur, providing baseline data for potential targeted “just‐in‐time” stress interventions tailored to unique stressors in specific environments. We also provide findings related to the “work from home” phenomenon. Further work is needed to better understand the unique stressors among the large number of individuals who transitioned to working from home during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139846037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xing Yao, Erik J. Nelson PhD, Kostas Stavrianakis PhD, Ting-Yen (Tim) Huang MBA, Casey Moran MS, Patrick C. Shih PhD, Evan J. Jordan PhD
Despite the importance of daily stress to individuals' health and wellbeing, few studies have explored where stress happens in real time, that is, dynamic stress processes in different spaces. As such, stress interventions rarely account for the environment in which stress occurs. We used mobile phone based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect daily stress data. Thirty-three participants utilized a mobile-phone-based EMA app to self-report stressors as they went about their daily lives. Geographic coordinates were automatically collected with each stress report. Data from thematic analysis of stressors by location (home, work, work from home, other) were used to determine whether certain stressors were more prevalent in certain environments. Nine daily stressors significantly differed by location. Work-related stress was reported more often at work. Pets, household chores, sleep, and media-related stressors were reported most at home. Physical illnesses, vehicle issues, and safety/security stressors occurred most often while participants were “working from home.” Traffic-related stress was experienced more commonly in “other” environments. Other 18 stressors were generated regardless of location, suggesting that these stressors were persistent and without respect to location. Study findings expand the understanding of environments in which specific stressors occur, providing baseline data for potential targeted “just-in-time” stress interventions tailored to unique stressors in specific environments. We also provide findings related to the “work from home” phenomenon. Further work is needed to better understand the unique stressors among the large number of individuals who transitioned to working from home during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
{"title":"Where does stress happen? Ecological momentary assessment of daily stressors using a mobile phone app","authors":"Xing Yao, Erik J. Nelson PhD, Kostas Stavrianakis PhD, Ting-Yen (Tim) Huang MBA, Casey Moran MS, Patrick C. Shih PhD, Evan J. Jordan PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.54","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.54","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the importance of daily stress to individuals' health and wellbeing, few studies have explored where stress happens in real time, that is, dynamic stress processes in different spaces. As such, stress interventions rarely account for the environment in which stress occurs. We used mobile phone based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect daily stress data. Thirty-three participants utilized a mobile-phone-based EMA app to self-report stressors as they went about their daily lives. Geographic coordinates were automatically collected with each stress report. Data from thematic analysis of stressors by location (home, work, work from home, other) were used to determine whether certain stressors were more prevalent in certain environments. Nine daily stressors significantly differed by location. Work-related stress was reported more often at work. Pets, household chores, sleep, and media-related stressors were reported most at home. Physical illnesses, vehicle issues, and safety/security stressors occurred most often while participants were “working from home.” Traffic-related stress was experienced more commonly in “other” environments. Other 18 stressors were generated regardless of location, suggesting that these stressors were persistent and without respect to location. Study findings expand the understanding of environments in which specific stressors occur, providing baseline data for potential targeted “just-in-time” stress interventions tailored to unique stressors in specific environments. We also provide findings related to the “work from home” phenomenon. Further work is needed to better understand the unique stressors among the large number of individuals who transitioned to working from home during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.54","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139786194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Bhogal, Autumm Heeter, Leah C. Gowatch, Tanja Jovanovic, H. Marusak
Caregivers may play an essential role in buffering and/or exacerbating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) fears and behaviors in youth. However, few studies have examined these associations in children from racial or ethnic minority groups, who have been historically marginalized and may be disproportionately susceptible to psychological consequences. Here, we examined the associations among caregivers and children in COVID‐19‐related fears, behaviors, and impact in a majority Black (71.9%) sample of children. Children (N = 64, 24 females, ages 7–10 years) were recruited from three Detroit, Michigan‐area schools during the 2019–2020 school year. Following school shutdowns in March 2020, children and their caregivers were invited to complete remote surveys in May and August 2020. We examined the associations among child and caregiver COVID‐19‐related fears, preventive behaviors, and perceived impact. We also examined whether aspects of the caregiver–child relationship (i.e., closeness, conflicts) moderated these associations. Caregiver–child fears about social distancing, preventive behaviors, and the perceived impact of COVID‐19 were positively correlated. The positive correlation between caregiver–child preventive behaviors strengthened over time and was moderated by caregiver–child closeness. These findings suggest that caregivers may impact fear as well as preventive behaviors and perceived impact of the pandemic in marginalized youth.
{"title":"The impact of caregivers on COVID‐19 fears, behaviors, and perceived impact in a majority Black American sample of children","authors":"A. Bhogal, Autumm Heeter, Leah C. Gowatch, Tanja Jovanovic, H. Marusak","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.53","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.53","url":null,"abstract":"Caregivers may play an essential role in buffering and/or exacerbating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) fears and behaviors in youth. However, few studies have examined these associations in children from racial or ethnic minority groups, who have been historically marginalized and may be disproportionately susceptible to psychological consequences. Here, we examined the associations among caregivers and children in COVID‐19‐related fears, behaviors, and impact in a majority Black (71.9%) sample of children. Children (N = 64, 24 females, ages 7–10 years) were recruited from three Detroit, Michigan‐area schools during the 2019–2020 school year. Following school shutdowns in March 2020, children and their caregivers were invited to complete remote surveys in May and August 2020. We examined the associations among child and caregiver COVID‐19‐related fears, preventive behaviors, and perceived impact. We also examined whether aspects of the caregiver–child relationship (i.e., closeness, conflicts) moderated these associations. Caregiver–child fears about social distancing, preventive behaviors, and the perceived impact of COVID‐19 were positively correlated. The positive correlation between caregiver–child preventive behaviors strengthened over time and was moderated by caregiver–child closeness. These findings suggest that caregivers may impact fear as well as preventive behaviors and perceived impact of the pandemic in marginalized youth.","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"93 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139854185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caregivers may play an essential role in buffering and/or exacerbating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) fears and behaviors in youth. However, few studies have examined these associations in children from racial or ethnic minority groups, who have been historically marginalized and may be disproportionately susceptible to psychological consequences. Here, we examined the associations among caregivers and children in COVID-19-related fears, behaviors, and impact in a majority Black (71.9%) sample of children. Children (N = 64, 24 females, ages 7–10 years) were recruited from three Detroit, Michigan-area schools during the 2019–2020 school year. Following school shutdowns in March 2020, children and their caregivers were invited to complete remote surveys in May and August 2020. We examined the associations among child and caregiver COVID-19-related fears, preventive behaviors, and perceived impact. We also examined whether aspects of the caregiver–child relationship (i.e., closeness, conflicts) moderated these associations. Caregiver–child fears about social distancing, preventive behaviors, and the perceived impact of COVID-19 were positively correlated. The positive correlation between caregiver–child preventive behaviors strengthened over time and was moderated by caregiver–child closeness. These findings suggest that caregivers may impact fear as well as preventive behaviors and perceived impact of the pandemic in marginalized youth.
{"title":"The impact of caregivers on COVID-19 fears, behaviors, and perceived impact in a majority Black American sample of children","authors":"Amanpreet Bhogal, Autumm Heeter, Leah Gowatch, Tanja Jovanovic PhD, Hilary A. Marusak PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.53","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.53","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Caregivers may play an essential role in buffering and/or exacerbating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) fears and behaviors in youth. However, few studies have examined these associations in children from racial or ethnic minority groups, who have been historically marginalized and may be disproportionately susceptible to psychological consequences. Here, we examined the associations among caregivers and children in COVID-19-related fears, behaviors, and impact in a majority Black (71.9%) sample of children. Children (<i>N</i> = 64, 24 females, ages 7–10 years) were recruited from three Detroit, Michigan-area schools during the 2019–2020 school year. Following school shutdowns in March 2020, children and their caregivers were invited to complete remote surveys in May and August 2020. We examined the associations among child and caregiver COVID-19-related fears, preventive behaviors, and perceived impact. We also examined whether aspects of the caregiver–child relationship (i.e., closeness, conflicts) moderated these associations. Caregiver–child fears about social distancing, preventive behaviors, and the perceived impact of COVID-19 were positively correlated. The positive correlation between caregiver–child preventive behaviors strengthened over time and was moderated by caregiver–child closeness. These findings suggest that caregivers may impact fear as well as preventive behaviors and perceived impact of the pandemic in marginalized youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.53","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139794375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susan Andersen PhD, Henrik Steen Andersen MedSc, Hannah Ahrensberg MSc, Ioana Lazar MSc, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Nanna Gram Ahlmark PhD
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects many military veterans. Given limited success of and barriers to conventional treatments, increasing interest is being paid to mind-body therapy approaches. However, little evidence exists on whether these have the potential to treat traumatic stress. The aim of this study was to compare 6 months of hands-on mind-body therapy as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU alone. Participants with PTSD resulting from active military service were randomly assigned to the intervention group or treatment-as-usual (TAU) group. The intervention group received 24 hands-on manipulative mind-body therapy sessions during 6 months as add-on to TAU. The primary outcome was the PTSD Checklist-Military version (PCL-M) at 6 months (postintervention). Outcome measurements were obtained at four time points; baseline, 3 months (midway), 6 months (postintervention), and 12 months (follow-up). Intention-to-treat analysis was done masked to allocation. A total of 42 participants were randomized (22 control, 20 intervention). In the intervention group, two discontinued the mind-body therapy. At postintervention, participants who had received mind-body treatment demonstrated greater reduction in PTSD severity (PCL-M scores between-group mean difference: −11.1, 95% CI −17.9 to −4.2, p = 0.002, effect size d = 1.06). At follow-up, PCL-M scores were not statistically significant between groups (between-group difference: −4.65, 95% CI −11.8 to 1.50). Post hoc analysis showed that number of participants remitting from PTSD from baseline to follow-up was 25% in the intervention group and 0% in the control group. Our study showed that hands-on mind-body therapy over 6 months produced clinically significant decrease in PTSD symptoms. The large reduction in symptoms was not maintained 6 months after the intervention period. Further research on mind-body therapy as adjunctive PTSD treatment is warranted.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)影响着许多退伍军人。由于传统治疗方法效果有限且存在障碍,人们越来越关注身心治疗方法。然而,几乎没有证据表明这些方法是否有治疗创伤应激障碍的潜力。本研究的目的是比较为期 6 个月的实践身心疗法作为常规治疗(TAU)的附加疗法与单独使用 TAU 的效果。因服兵役而患有创伤后应激障碍的参与者被随机分配到干预组或常规治疗(TAU)组。干预组在6个月内接受24次动手操作身心疗法,作为TAU的附加疗法。主要结果是 6 个月(干预后)时的创伤后应激障碍检查表-军事版(PCL-M)。结果测量在四个时间点进行:基线、3 个月(中途)、6 个月(干预后)和 12 个月(随访)。意向治疗分析在分配时进行。共有 42 名参与者被随机分配(22 名对照组,20 名干预组)。干预组中有两人中断了身心疗法。干预后,接受过身心疗法的参与者创伤后应激障碍的严重程度明显减轻(PCL-M 评分在组间的平均差异为-11.1,95% C-0):-11.1,95% CI -17.9 to -4.2,p = 0.002,效应大小 d = 1.06)。随访时,PCL-M评分在组间无统计学意义(组间差异:-4.65,95% CI -11.8至1.50)。事后分析表明,从基线到随访,干预组缓解创伤后应激障碍的人数为 25%,对照组为 0%。我们的研究表明,为期6个月的实践身心疗法能显著减少创伤后应激障碍症状。在干预期结束 6 个月后,症状的大幅减轻并未得到维持。有必要对身心疗法作为创伤后应激障碍的辅助治疗方法进行进一步研究。
{"title":"Effects of hands-on mind-body therapy on posttraumatic stress disorder among Danish military veterans: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Susan Andersen PhD, Henrik Steen Andersen MedSc, Hannah Ahrensberg MSc, Ioana Lazar MSc, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Nanna Gram Ahlmark PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.52","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.52","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects many military veterans. Given limited success of and barriers to conventional treatments, increasing interest is being paid to mind-body therapy approaches. However, little evidence exists on whether these have the potential to treat traumatic stress. The aim of this study was to compare 6 months of hands-on mind-body therapy as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU alone. Participants with PTSD resulting from active military service were randomly assigned to the intervention group or treatment-as-usual (TAU) group. The intervention group received 24 hands-on manipulative mind-body therapy sessions during 6 months as add-on to TAU. The primary outcome was the PTSD Checklist-Military version (PCL-M) at 6 months (postintervention). Outcome measurements were obtained at four time points; baseline, 3 months (midway), 6 months (postintervention), and 12 months (follow-up). Intention-to-treat analysis was done masked to allocation. A total of 42 participants were randomized (22 control, 20 intervention). In the intervention group, two discontinued the mind-body therapy. At postintervention, participants who had received mind-body treatment demonstrated greater reduction in PTSD severity (PCL-M scores between-group mean difference: −11.1, 95% CI −17.9 to −4.2, <i>p</i> = 0.002, effect size <i>d</i> = 1.06). At follow-up, PCL-M scores were not statistically significant between groups (between-group difference: −4.65, 95% CI −11.8 to 1.50). Post hoc analysis showed that number of participants remitting from PTSD from baseline to follow-up was 25% in the intervention group and 0% in the control group. Our study showed that hands-on mind-body therapy over 6 months produced clinically significant decrease in PTSD symptoms. The large reduction in symptoms was not maintained 6 months after the intervention period. Further research on mind-body therapy as adjunctive PTSD treatment is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.52","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140488904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grace E. Rowland, Juliann B. Purcell, Lauren A. M. Lebois, Milissa L. Kaufman, Nathaniel G. Harnett
Sexual trauma (ST) occurs with alarming frequency in the United States in the form of both childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and adulthood sexual assault (ASA). It is well established that the effects of ST are pervasive and that ST can be a risk factor for the development of several psychiatric disorders. However, the potential for distinct psychological consequences or neural correlates between CSA and ASA has received little attention. Furthermore, despite the high prevalence of sexual revictimization, the combinatorial effects of CSA and ASA are understudied in comparison to each form of ST on its own. In the current review, we present results from both clinical psychology and neuroscience research on the impacts of CSA and ASA, describing major psychological, biopsychosocial, and neuroimaging findings for each form of ST. We further highlight limitations in the current state of the research and needed areas of future research to better understand the distinct, overlapping, and cumulative effects of ST in both childhood and adulthood. The present study summarizes the state of the literature on this critical form of trauma and provides recommendations for future clinical research practices to mitigate the deleterious outcomes of ST.
在美国,性创伤(ST)以儿童性虐待(CSA)和成年性侵犯(ASA)的形式频繁发生,令人震惊。众所周知,性创伤的影响是普遍存在的,而且性创伤可能是导致多种精神疾病的风险因素。然而,CSA 和 ASA 之间可能存在的不同心理后果或神经相关性却很少受到关注。此外,尽管性再伤害的发生率很高,但与每种形式的 ST 本身相比,CSA 和 ASA 的组合效应却未得到充分研究。在本综述中,我们介绍了临床心理学和神经科学对 CSA 和 ASA 影响的研究结果,描述了每种 ST 形式的主要心理学、生物心理社会学和神经影像学发现。我们进一步强调了研究现状的局限性和未来研究的需求领域,以便更好地了解 ST 对儿童期和成年期的不同、重叠和累积影响。本研究总结了有关这种关键形式创伤的文献现状,并为未来的临床研究实践提供了建议,以减轻 ST 的有害后果。
{"title":"Child sexual abuse versus adult sexual assault: A review of psychological and neurobiological sequelae","authors":"Grace E. Rowland, Juliann B. Purcell, Lauren A. M. Lebois, Milissa L. Kaufman, Nathaniel G. Harnett","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.51","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.51","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sexual trauma (ST) occurs with alarming frequency in the United States in the form of both childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and adulthood sexual assault (ASA). It is well established that the effects of ST are pervasive and that ST can be a risk factor for the development of several psychiatric disorders. However, the potential for distinct psychological consequences or neural correlates between CSA and ASA has received little attention. Furthermore, despite the high prevalence of sexual revictimization, the combinatorial effects of CSA and ASA are understudied in comparison to each form of ST on its own. In the current review, we present results from both clinical psychology and neuroscience research on the impacts of CSA and ASA, describing major psychological, biopsychosocial, and neuroimaging findings for each form of ST. We further highlight limitations in the current state of the research and needed areas of future research to better understand the distinct, overlapping, and cumulative effects of ST in both childhood and adulthood. The present study summarizes the state of the literature on this critical form of trauma and provides recommendations for future clinical research practices to mitigate the deleterious outcomes of ST.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.51","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139534648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}