This study investigated the effect of perceived physician burnout on psychological distress (anxiety, depression, and secondary traumatic stress) in physician spouses. Two-hundred and three physician spouses participated in the study between April and May 2021. Physician spouses completed a burnout measure on behalf of their physician partner, and psychological distress measures for themselves. Results showed perceived physician burnout was positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.24), depression (r = 0.13), and secondary traumatic stress (r = 0.14) in physician spouses. A covariate analysis including eight demographic variables did not significantly contribute to the relationship between perceived physician burnout and psychological distress in physician spouses. Moderation analyses showed no significant interactions when the personality trait agreeableness, total score on a resiliency questionnaire, and compassion fatigue were included as moderators in the relationship between perceived physician burnout and psychological distress in physician spouses. These findings indicate that physician spouses experience secondary psychological distress when they believe their partner (the physician) is experiencing burnout, emphasizing the need for mental health support during medical training.
{"title":"When perceived physician burnout leads to family burnout: How secondary emotional trauma impacts physician spouses","authors":"Sarah A. Grimmer PhD, Kristine M. Jacquin PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.38","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.38","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the effect of perceived physician burnout on psychological distress (anxiety, depression, and secondary traumatic stress) in physician spouses. Two-hundred and three physician spouses participated in the study between April and May 2021. Physician spouses completed a burnout measure on behalf of their physician partner, and psychological distress measures for themselves. Results showed perceived physician burnout was positively correlated with anxiety (<i>r</i> = 0.24), depression (<i>r</i> = 0.13), and secondary traumatic stress (<i>r</i> = 0.14) in physician spouses. A covariate analysis including eight demographic variables did not significantly contribute to the relationship between perceived physician burnout and psychological distress in physician spouses. Moderation analyses showed no significant interactions when the personality trait agreeableness, total score on a resiliency questionnaire, and compassion fatigue were included as moderators in the relationship between perceived physician burnout and psychological distress in physician spouses. These findings indicate that physician spouses experience secondary psychological distress when they believe their partner (the physician) is experiencing burnout, emphasizing the need for mental health support during medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 4","pages":"231-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.38","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135645296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: To promote mental health globally, including low-and middle-income countries, research and advocacy are essential. The Republic of The Gambia is one of the smallest countries in the world and is the focus of this research. Purpose: This study examines social and cultural aspects of access to mental health treatment in The Gambia, West Africa. Methodology: The population of focus consisted of adults over 18 living in The Gambia. The methodological approach was a qualitative phenomenological study involving semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom, by a researcher from The Gambia. Results: Data were collected from 17 participants living in The Gambia at the time of the study. A team of analysts with diverse backgrounds evaluated transcripts and identified five themes highlighting social and cultural conceptualizations of mental health and mental illness, sociocultural determinants of health, interventions, barriers to care, and legal frameworks to support mental health change. Conclusions: The findings from this study are significant for mental health providers who seek to understand different perceptions of mental health and mental illness and the associated stigma. Furthermore, this study suggests several opportunities for mental health advocacy in The Gambia
{"title":"Mental Health Advocacy in The Gambia, West Africa","authors":"Stephanie Thorson-Olesen, Safiya Njai","doi":"10.56508/mhgcj.v6i1.174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56508/mhgcj.v6i1.174","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To promote mental health globally, including low-and middle-income countries, research and advocacy are essential. The Republic of The Gambia is one of the smallest countries in the world and is the focus of this research. Purpose: This study examines social and cultural aspects of access to mental health treatment in The Gambia, West Africa. Methodology: The population of focus consisted of adults over 18 living in The Gambia. The methodological approach was a qualitative phenomenological study involving semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom, by a researcher from The Gambia. Results: Data were collected from 17 participants living in The Gambia at the time of the study. A team of analysts with diverse backgrounds evaluated transcripts and identified five themes highlighting social and cultural conceptualizations of mental health and mental illness, sociocultural determinants of health, interventions, barriers to care, and legal frameworks to support mental health change. Conclusions: The findings from this study are significant for mental health providers who seek to understand different perceptions of mental health and mental illness and the associated stigma. Furthermore, this study suggests several opportunities for mental health advocacy in The Gambia","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136236523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah Abdul-Ghani BS, Emma C. Lathan PhD, Amanda Miao BS, Rebecca Gibbons BS, Leyla Eghbalzad PhD, Abigail Powers PhD, ABPP, Negar Fani PhD
Racially minoritized women with limited socioeconomic resources are at increased risk for adverse psychological outcomes in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Disproportionate rates of trauma exposure and economic insecurity likely heighten risk for these outcomes among socioeconomically vulnerable individuals, but the unique contributions of these factors are poorly understood. As such, we examined trauma and economic factors as predictors of pandemic-related psychological distress and symptoms. Ninety-six women recruited for a trauma research study (91.7% Black, Mage = 38.3 years, SDage = 11.8 years) completed measures of trauma exposure, economic insecurity, and several items assessing psychological distress and symptoms related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined concern for mental and physical health impacts of COVID-19 as well as changes in self-reported levels of anxiety and anhedonia from the 3 months before the pandemic to the previous 2 weeks. Linear regression analyses were used to assess contributions of trauma exposure and economic insecurity to COVID-19-related distress. Childhood maltreatment and lifetime trauma exposure did not predict COVID-19-related distress; however, financial concern significantly contributed to concern for the physical health impact of COVID-19 (B = 0.30, p < 0.05). Food insecurity emerged as the only significant predictor of concern for the mental health impact of COVID-19 (B = 0.91, p < 0.01). Housing instability was the only significant predictor of COVID-19-related increases in anhedonia (B = −0.30, p < 0.05). Economic insecurity, namely, self-reported financial concern, food insecurity, and housing instability, was related to COVID-19-related psychological distress and symptoms in a sample of predominately Black American women living in under-resourced communities. Findings may help identify populations at risk for COVID-19-related psychological distress and symptoms and appropriate interventions, such as expanding access to nutritious food sources and housing support, for minoritized community members.
{"title":"Contributions of trauma and economic insecurity to psychological distress in response to the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Sarah Abdul-Ghani BS, Emma C. Lathan PhD, Amanda Miao BS, Rebecca Gibbons BS, Leyla Eghbalzad PhD, Abigail Powers PhD, ABPP, Negar Fani PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.36","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.36","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Racially minoritized women with limited socioeconomic resources are at increased risk for adverse psychological outcomes in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Disproportionate rates of trauma exposure and economic insecurity likely heighten risk for these outcomes among socioeconomically vulnerable individuals, but the unique contributions of these factors are poorly understood. As such, we examined trauma and economic factors as predictors of pandemic-related psychological distress and symptoms. Ninety-six women recruited for a trauma research study (91.7% Black, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 38.3 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 11.8 years) completed measures of trauma exposure, economic insecurity, and several items assessing psychological distress and symptoms related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined concern for mental and physical health impacts of COVID-19 as well as changes in self-reported levels of anxiety and anhedonia from the 3 months before the pandemic to the previous 2 weeks. Linear regression analyses were used to assess contributions of trauma exposure and economic insecurity to COVID-19-related distress. Childhood maltreatment and lifetime trauma exposure did not predict COVID-19-related distress; however, financial concern significantly contributed to concern for the physical health impact of COVID-19 (<i>B</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Food insecurity emerged as the only significant predictor of concern for the mental health impact of COVID-19 (<i>B</i> = 0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Housing instability was the only significant predictor of COVID-19-related increases in anhedonia (<i>B</i> = −0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Economic insecurity, namely, self-reported financial concern, food insecurity, and housing instability, was related to COVID-19-related psychological distress and symptoms in a sample of predominately Black American women living in under-resourced communities. Findings may help identify populations at risk for COVID-19-related psychological distress and symptoms and appropriate interventions, such as expanding access to nutritious food sources and housing support, for minoritized community members.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 4","pages":"222-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.36","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73976771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meghna Ravi, Abigail Powers, Barbara O. Rothbaum, Jennifer S. Stevens, Vasiliki Michopoulos
Individuals living in areas with high rates of poverty are disproportionately affected by posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite this association, little is known about how neighborhood poverty rates impact risk for PTSD development. In the current prospective study, we determined the relationship between neighborhood poverty rate and PTSD symptoms 6-months after experiencing a traumatic event in a sample of varied race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Participants (N = 252) were enrolled in a hospital emergency department after experiencing a traumatic event. Demographic information (including zip code of residence), baseline PTSD symptoms, and baseline trauma history was assessed in the emergency department. PTSD symptoms were again assessed 6-months posttrauma. Neighborhood poverty rate was determined using the American Community Survey. Correlation analyses revealed that neighborhood poverty was significantly associated with baseline PTSD symptoms (r = 0.181, p = 0.004) and PTSD symptoms 6-months posttrauma (r = 0.163, p = 0.009). A regression analysis controlling for baseline trauma exposure, clinician-rated trauma severity, and individual socioeconomic status demonstrated that neighborhood poverty predicted PTSD symptoms six-months posttrauma (R2 = 0.099, B = 0.15, p = 0.04), but this relationship was no longer significant when baseline PTSD symptoms was added as an additional covariate (R2 = 0.304, B = 0.07, p > 0.05). Overall, results suggest that neighborhood poverty generally increases PTSD symptom severity, and the context in which an individual lives should be considered when conceptualizing risk for PTSD.
{"title":"Neighborhood poverty prospectively predicts PTSD symptoms six-months following trauma exposure","authors":"Meghna Ravi, Abigail Powers, Barbara O. Rothbaum, Jennifer S. Stevens, Vasiliki Michopoulos","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.35","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.35","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals living in areas with high rates of poverty are disproportionately affected by posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite this association, little is known about how neighborhood poverty rates impact risk for PTSD development. In the current prospective study, we determined the relationship between neighborhood poverty rate and PTSD symptoms 6-months after experiencing a traumatic event in a sample of varied race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Participants (<i>N</i> = 252) were enrolled in a hospital emergency department after experiencing a traumatic event. Demographic information (including zip code of residence), baseline PTSD symptoms, and baseline trauma history was assessed in the emergency department. PTSD symptoms were again assessed 6-months posttrauma. Neighborhood poverty rate was determined using the American Community Survey. Correlation analyses revealed that neighborhood poverty was significantly associated with baseline PTSD symptoms (<i>r</i> = 0.181, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and PTSD symptoms 6-months posttrauma (<i>r</i> = 0.163, <i>p</i> = 0.009). A regression analysis controlling for baseline trauma exposure, clinician-rated trauma severity, and individual socioeconomic status demonstrated that neighborhood poverty predicted PTSD symptoms six-months posttrauma (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.099, <i>B</i> = 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.04), but this relationship was no longer significant when baseline PTSD symptoms was added as an additional covariate (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.304, <i>B</i> = 0.07, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Overall, results suggest that neighborhood poverty generally increases PTSD symptom severity, and the context in which an individual lives should be considered when conceptualizing risk for PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 4","pages":"213-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.35","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84619697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Persons with bulimia nervosa (BN) often experience psychosocial difficulties, in particular heightened sensitivity to social rejection and a negative bias toward their social environment. Conversely, social competence and close friendships are protective against mental ill health. The aims of this study were to evaluate the interpretation of ambiguous social scenarios in females with and without BN and to assess the relationship between interpretation biases and clinical characteristics. Females with BN (n = 35) and controls (n = 35) were recruited via social media. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS), and finished sentence stems depicting ambiguous social scenarios. Completed sentence stems were rated as positive, neutral, or negative by blinded researchers. Females with BN made fewer positive and more negative interpretations of sentence stems than controls. The frequency of negative interpretations correlated positively with clinical symptoms on the EDE-Q, A-RSQ, and DASS. A negative interpretation bias was found in females with BN, which aligns with the finding shown by Cardi et al. that females with anorexia nervosa have a negative interpretation bias toward ambiguous social scenarios. This bias was not only associated with eating disorder psychopathology but also with depression, anxiety, and stress, highlighting a potential transdiagnostic role. Interventions that address psychosocial difficulties might prevent the onset, reduce symptoms, and improve prognosis.
{"title":"Negative interpretation bias in females with bulimia nervosa","authors":"Victoria Burmester, Dasha Nicholls","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.34","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Persons with bulimia nervosa (BN) often experience psychosocial difficulties, in particular heightened sensitivity to social rejection and a negative bias toward their social environment. Conversely, social competence and close friendships are protective against mental ill health. The aims of this study were to evaluate the interpretation of ambiguous social scenarios in females with and without BN and to assess the relationship between interpretation biases and clinical characteristics. Females with BN (<i>n</i> = 35) and controls (<i>n</i> = 35) were recruited via social media. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS), and finished sentence stems depicting ambiguous social scenarios. Completed sentence stems were rated as positive, neutral, or negative by blinded researchers. Females with BN made fewer positive and more negative interpretations of sentence stems than controls. The frequency of negative interpretations correlated positively with clinical symptoms on the EDE-Q, A-RSQ, and DASS. A negative interpretation bias was found in females with BN, which aligns with the finding shown by Cardi et al. that females with anorexia nervosa have a negative interpretation bias toward ambiguous social scenarios. This bias was not only associated with eating disorder psychopathology but also with depression, anxiety, and stress, highlighting a potential transdiagnostic role. Interventions that address psychosocial difficulties might prevent the onset, reduce symptoms, and improve prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"195-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.34","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50144144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}