Dennis B. Daliri MD, Gifty A. Aninanya PhD, Timothy T. Laari RN, MPhil, Nancy Abagye BSc, Richard Dei-Asamoa MD, MPhil, MSc, Richard A. Afaya PhD candidate, Agani Afaya PhD
Family caregivers' role in sending their mentally ill relatives to the mental health service (MHS) has been vital in the era of community mental healthcare. They are the determinants of where mentally ill relatives are sent for care. There is currently no evidence about the motivators of MHS use among these major stakeholders in the Bolgatanga municipality. This study, therefore, sought to explore the perceived utilization and the motivating factors for the utilization of MHS in the Bolgatanga municipality. A descriptive qualitative study design was employed to conduct the study in two health facilities (Presbyterian Psychiatric Hospital and the Upper East Regional Hospital). A semi-structured interview guide was used to conduct in-depth interviews among 19 purposively sampled participants consisting of 15 family caregivers of mentally ill relatives, two MHS providers, and two MHS administrators. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Two main themes emerged including perceived utilization of MHS by family caregivers and motivating factors for the utilization of MHS. The study showed that most participants sought MHS for their mentally ill relatives. The study further identified multilevel factors such as individual factors, interpersonal factors, organizational factors, and policy-level factors that motivated the utilization of MHS in the Bolgatanga municipality. There is a need to embark on activities that will further strengthen the factors that have been identified as motivators to encourage the continuous utilization of MHS in the municipality.
{"title":"Exploring the motivations of mental health service utilization among family caregivers in Bolgatanga, Upper East Region, Ghana","authors":"Dennis B. Daliri MD, Gifty A. Aninanya PhD, Timothy T. Laari RN, MPhil, Nancy Abagye BSc, Richard Dei-Asamoa MD, MPhil, MSc, Richard A. Afaya PhD candidate, Agani Afaya PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.50","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.50","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Family caregivers' role in sending their mentally ill relatives to the mental health service (MHS) has been vital in the era of community mental healthcare. They are the determinants of where mentally ill relatives are sent for care. There is currently no evidence about the motivators of MHS use among these major stakeholders in the Bolgatanga municipality. This study, therefore, sought to explore the perceived utilization and the motivating factors for the utilization of MHS in the Bolgatanga municipality. A descriptive qualitative study design was employed to conduct the study in two health facilities (Presbyterian Psychiatric Hospital and the Upper East Regional Hospital). A semi-structured interview guide was used to conduct in-depth interviews among 19 purposively sampled participants consisting of 15 family caregivers of mentally ill relatives, two MHS providers, and two MHS administrators. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Two main themes emerged including perceived utilization of MHS by family caregivers and motivating factors for the utilization of MHS. The study showed that most participants sought MHS for their mentally ill relatives. The study further identified multilevel factors such as individual factors, interpersonal factors, organizational factors, and policy-level factors that motivated the utilization of MHS in the Bolgatanga municipality. There is a need to embark on activities that will further strengthen the factors that have been identified as motivators to encourage the continuous utilization of MHS in the municipality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.50","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139383744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jamie M. Gajos, Jason A. Oliver, Emily T. Hébert, Scott T. Walters, Michael S. Businelle
The prevalence of alcohol-use disorders is higher amongst adults experiencing homelessness (AEH) compared with domiciled adults. Greater exposure to heavy drinkers increases personal risk for heavy alcohol use. AEH spend substantial periods of time at shelters and report greater pressure to use alcohol when near shelter locations, as well as greater negative affect when near a shelter. It is unclear if the relationship between affect and (1) interacting with people and (2) being near someone AEH drank alcohol with before differs when AEH are at a shelter versus not. AEH reporting alcohol misuse (n = 72, Mage = 47, 85% male, 68% non-White) completed five daily smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments over 28 days. Generalized multilevel modeling revealed that when AEH were interacting with someone they drank with before, they had significantly lower positive affect when at a shelter (b = −0.17, p = 0.05) versus when not (b = 0.00, p = 0.99). AEH are likely to interact with previous drinking partners while at shelters. It may be important to deliver real-time treatment messages targeting affect in these moments, as well as deliver alcohol reduction/abstinence messages.
{"title":"Does the relationship between affect and social interactions among adults experiencing homelessness differ during moments when at a shelter versus not?","authors":"Jamie M. Gajos, Jason A. Oliver, Emily T. Hébert, Scott T. Walters, Michael S. Businelle","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.47","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.47","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prevalence of alcohol-use disorders is higher amongst adults experiencing homelessness (AEH) compared with domiciled adults. Greater exposure to heavy drinkers increases personal risk for heavy alcohol use. AEH spend substantial periods of time at shelters and report greater pressure to use alcohol when near shelter locations, as well as greater negative affect when near a shelter. It is unclear if the relationship between affect and (1) interacting with people and (2) being near someone AEH drank alcohol with before differs when AEH are at a shelter versus not. AEH reporting alcohol misuse (<i>n</i> = 72, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47, 85% male, 68% non-White) completed five daily smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments over 28 days. Generalized multilevel modeling revealed that when AEH were interacting with someone they drank with before, they had significantly lower positive affect when at a shelter (<i>b</i> = −0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.05) versus when not (<i>b</i> = 0.00, <i>p</i> = 0.99). AEH are likely to interact with previous drinking partners while at shelters. It may be important to deliver real-time treatment messages targeting affect in these moments, as well as deliver alcohol reduction/abstinence messages.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 1","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.47","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139000349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mia Harada-Laszlo, Anahita Talwar, Oliver J. Robinson, Alexandra C. Pike
Catastrophizing is a transdiagnostic construct that has been suggested to precipitate and maintain a multiplicity of psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, the underlying cognitive mechanisms that result in catastrophizing are unknown. Relating reinforcement learning model parameters to catastrophizing may allow us to further understand the process of catastrophizing. Using a modified four-armed bandit task, we aimed to investigate the relationship between reinforcement learning parameters and self-report catastrophizing questionnaire scores to gain a mechanistic understanding of how catastrophizing may alter learning. We recruited 211 participants to complete a computerized four-armed bandit task and tested the fit of six reinforcement learning models on our data, including two novel models which both incorporated a scaling factor related to a history of negative outcomes variable. We investigated the relationship between self-report catastrophizing scores and free parameters from the overall best-fitting model, along with the best-fitting model to include history, using Pearson's correlations. Subsequently, we reassessed these relationships using multiple regression analyses to evaluate whether any observed relationships were altered when relevant IQ and mental health covariates were applied. Model-agnostic analyses indicated there were effects of outcome history on reaction time and accuracy, and that the effects on accuracy related to catastrophizing. The overall model of best fit was the Standard Rescorla–Wagner Model and the best-fitting model to include history was a model in which learning rate was scaled by history of negative outcome. We found no effect of catastrophizing on the scaling by history of negative outcome parameter (r = 0.003, p = 0.679), the learning rate parameter (r = 0.026, p = 0.703), or the inverse temperature parameter (r = 0.086, p = 0.220). We were unable to relate catastrophizing to any of the reinforcement learning parameters we investigated. This implies that catastrophizing is not straightforwardly linked to any changes to learning after a series of negative outcomes are received. Future research could incorporate further exploration of the space of models which include a history parameter.
{"title":"A series of unfortunate events: Do those who catastrophize learn more after negative outcomes?","authors":"Mia Harada-Laszlo, Anahita Talwar, Oliver J. Robinson, Alexandra C. Pike","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.49","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mhs2.49","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Catastrophizing is a transdiagnostic construct that has been suggested to precipitate and maintain a multiplicity of psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, the underlying cognitive mechanisms that result in catastrophizing are unknown. Relating reinforcement learning model parameters to catastrophizing may allow us to further understand the process of catastrophizing. Using a modified four-armed bandit task, we aimed to investigate the relationship between reinforcement learning parameters and self-report catastrophizing questionnaire scores to gain a mechanistic understanding of how catastrophizing may alter learning. We recruited 211 participants to complete a computerized four-armed bandit task and tested the fit of six reinforcement learning models on our data, including two novel models which both incorporated a scaling factor related to a <i>history of negative outcomes</i> variable. We investigated the relationship between self-report catastrophizing scores and free parameters from the overall best-fitting model, along with the best-fitting model to include <i>history</i>, using Pearson's correlations. Subsequently, we reassessed these relationships using multiple regression analyses to evaluate whether any observed relationships were altered when relevant IQ and mental health covariates were applied. Model-agnostic analyses indicated there were effects of outcome history on reaction time and accuracy, and that the effects on accuracy related to catastrophizing. The overall model of best fit was the Standard Rescorla–Wagner Model and the best-fitting model to include <i>history</i> was a model in which learning rate was scaled by history of negative outcome. We found no effect of catastrophizing on the scaling by history of negative outcome parameter (<i>r</i> = 0.003, <i>p</i> = 0.679), the learning rate parameter (<i>r</i> = 0.026, <i>p</i> = 0.703), or the inverse temperature parameter (<i>r</i> = 0.086, <i>p</i> = 0.220). We were unable to relate catastrophizing to any of the reinforcement learning parameters we investigated. This implies that catastrophizing is not straightforwardly linked to any changes to learning after a series of negative outcomes are received. Future research could incorporate further exploration of the space of models which include a <i>history</i> parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 1","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.49","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138979280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Felipe Saceanu Leser, Mirella Araújo Ribeiro, Lucas Dalsente Romano da Silva, Renato Garcia Domingues, Tiago Fleming Outeiro, Kevin Boyé, Eduardo Coelho Cerqueira, Fabiano Lacerda Carvalho, Phelippe do Carmo Gonçalves