Pub Date : 2024-08-21DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100729
Judy O’Sullivan , Edward Moore , Simon Dunn , Helen Tennant , Dexter Smith , Sarah Black , Sarah Yates , Amelia Lawrence , Madeline McManus , Emma Day , Martin Miles , Steve Irving , Sue Hampshire , Lynn Thomas , Nick Henry , Dave Bywater , Michael Bradfield , Charles D. Deakin , Simon Holmes , Stephanie Leckey , Gavin D. Perkins
Background
Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation is key to increasing survival following an out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA). However, automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are used in a very small percentage of cases. Despite large numbers of AEDs in the community, the absence of a unified system for registering their locations across the UK’s ambulance services may have resulted in missed opportunities to save lives. Therefore, representatives from the resuscitation community worked alongside ambulance services to develop a single repository for data on the location of AEDs in the UK.
Methods
A national defibrillator network, “The Circuit”, was developed by the British Heart Foundation in collaboration with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, the UK ambulance services, the Resuscitation Council UK and St John Ambulance. The database allows individuals or organisations to record information about AED location, accessibility, and availability. The database synchronises with ambulance computer aided dispatch systems to provide UK ambulance services with real-time information on the nearest, available AED.
Results
The Circuit was successfully rolled out to all 14 UK ambulance services. Since 2019, 82,108 AEDs have been registered. Of the AED data collected by The Circuit, 54% were not previously registered to any ambulance service, and are therefore new registrations.
Conclusion
The Circuit provides ambulance services with a single point of access to AED locations in the UK. Since the launch of the system the number of defibrillators registered has doubled. Linking the Circuit data with patient outcome data will help understand whether improving the accessibility to AEDs is associated with increased survival.
背景早期心肺复苏和除颤是提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者存活率的关键。然而,自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用率非常低。尽管社区内有大量的自动体外除颤器,但由于英国的救护车服务缺乏统一的登记系统,可能导致错失挽救生命的机会。因此,复苏界的代表与救护车服务机构合作,共同开发了英国自动体外除颤仪位置数据的单一存储库。方法英国心脏基金会与救护车行政主管协会、英国救护车服务机构、英国复苏委员会和圣约翰救护车公司合作开发了全国性的除颤仪网络 "The Circuit"。该数据库允许个人或组织记录有关自动体外除颤器位置、可及性和可用性的信息。该数据库与救护车计算机辅助调度系统同步,为英国救护车服务提供最近的可用自动体外除颤器的实时信息。自 2019 年以来,已有 82 108 台自动体外除颤器注册。在 The Circuit 收集的自动体外除颤器数据中,54% 以前未在任何救护车服务机构注册过,因此是新注册的。自该系统启动以来,注册的除颤仪数量翻了一番。将 Circuit 数据与患者预后数据联系起来,将有助于了解自动体外除颤器使用率的提高是否与存活率的提高有关。
{"title":"Development of a centralised national AED (automated external defibrillator) network across all ambulance services in the United Kingdom","authors":"Judy O’Sullivan , Edward Moore , Simon Dunn , Helen Tennant , Dexter Smith , Sarah Black , Sarah Yates , Amelia Lawrence , Madeline McManus , Emma Day , Martin Miles , Steve Irving , Sue Hampshire , Lynn Thomas , Nick Henry , Dave Bywater , Michael Bradfield , Charles D. Deakin , Simon Holmes , Stephanie Leckey , Gavin D. Perkins","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100729","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100729","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation is key to increasing survival following an out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA). However, automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are used in a very small percentage of cases. Despite large numbers of AEDs in the community, the absence of a unified system for registering their locations across the UK’s ambulance services may have resulted in missed opportunities to save lives. Therefore, representatives from the resuscitation community worked alongside ambulance services to develop a single repository for data on the location of AEDs in the UK.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national defibrillator network, “The Circuit”, was developed by the British Heart Foundation in collaboration with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, the UK ambulance services, the Resuscitation Council UK and St John Ambulance. The database allows individuals or organisations to record information about AED location, accessibility, and availability. The database synchronises with ambulance computer aided dispatch systems to provide UK ambulance services with real-time information on the nearest, available AED.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Circuit was successfully rolled out to all 14 UK ambulance services. Since 2019, 82,108 AEDs have been registered. Of the AED data collected by The Circuit, 54% were not previously registered to any ambulance service, and are therefore new registrations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Circuit provides ambulance services with a single point of access to AED locations in the UK. Since the launch of the system the number of defibrillators registered has doubled. Linking the Circuit data with patient outcome data will help understand whether improving the accessibility to AEDs is associated with increased survival.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001802/pdfft?md5=552122d32bc96e10b371b36600967b89&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001802-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142021070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100747
Cheng-Yi Fan , Edward Pei-Chuan Huang , Yi-Chien Kuo , Yun-Chang Chen , Wen‑Chu Chiang , Chien-Hua Huang , Chih-Wei Sung , Wei-Tien Chang
Background
The survival trend and factors influencing short- and mid-term mortality in Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors should be elucidated. We performed survival analyses on days 3 and 30, hypothesizing decreased survival rates within the initial 3 days post-resuscitation. Additionally, variables linked to mortality at these two timepoints were examined.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis on adult nontraumatic OHCA survivors admitted to the National Taiwan University Hospital and its branches between 2017 and 2021. We collected the following variables from the NTUH-Integrative Medical Database: basic characteristics, cardiopulmonary resuscitation events, inotrope administration, and post-resuscitation management. The outcomes included 3- and 30-day mortality. Subgroup analyses with the Kaplan–Meier method explored the survival probability of the OHCA survivors and assessed differences in cumulative survival among subgroups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval.
Results
Of the 967 survivors, 273 (28.2%) and 604 (62.5%) died within 3 and 30 days, respectively. The 30-day survival curve after OHCA showed an uneven decline, with the most significant decrease within the first 3 days of admission. Various risk factors influence mortality at 3- and 30-day intervals. Although increased age, noncardiac etiology, and prolonged low-flow time increased mortality risks, bystander CPR, targeted temperature management, and continuous renal replacement therapy were associated with reduced mortality at 3- and 30-day timeframes.
Conclusion
Survival declined in most OHCA survivors within 3 days post-resuscitation. The risk factors associated with mortality at 3- and 30-day intervals varied in this population.
{"title":"The short- and mid-term mortality trends in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: insights from a 5-year multicenter retrospective study in Taiwan","authors":"Cheng-Yi Fan , Edward Pei-Chuan Huang , Yi-Chien Kuo , Yun-Chang Chen , Wen‑Chu Chiang , Chien-Hua Huang , Chih-Wei Sung , Wei-Tien Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The survival trend and factors influencing short- and mid-term mortality in Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors should be elucidated. We performed survival analyses on days 3 and 30, hypothesizing decreased survival rates within the initial 3 days post-resuscitation. Additionally, variables linked to mortality at these two timepoints were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective analysis on adult nontraumatic OHCA survivors admitted to the National Taiwan University Hospital and its branches between 2017 and 2021. We collected the following variables from the NTUH-Integrative Medical Database: basic characteristics, cardiopulmonary resuscitation events, inotrope administration, and post-resuscitation management. The outcomes included 3- and 30-day mortality. Subgroup analyses with the Kaplan–Meier method explored the survival probability of the OHCA survivors and assessed differences in cumulative survival among subgroups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 967 survivors, 273 (28.2%) and 604 (62.5%) died within 3 and 30 days, respectively. The 30-day survival curve after OHCA showed an uneven decline, with the most significant decrease within the first 3 days of admission. Various risk factors influence mortality at 3- and 30-day intervals. Although increased age, noncardiac etiology, and prolonged low-flow time increased mortality risks, bystander CPR, targeted temperature management, and continuous renal replacement therapy were associated with reduced mortality at 3- and 30-day timeframes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Survival declined in most OHCA survivors within 3 days post-resuscitation. The risk factors associated with mortality at 3- and 30-day intervals varied in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266652042400198X/pdfft?md5=2e9c894b3dd2052b8193b024df4a45c1&pid=1-s2.0-S266652042400198X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-16DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100732
Bettina Nagy , Ádám Pál-Jakab , Gábor Orbán , Boldizsár Kiss , Alexa Fekete-Győr , Gábor Koós , Béla Merkely , István Hizoh , Enikő Kovács , Endre Zima
Introduction
Survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain low, and early prognostication is challenging. While numerous intensive care unit scoring systems exist, their utility in the early hours following hospital admission, specifically in the targeted temperature management (TTM) population, is questionable. Our aim was to create a score system that may accurately estimate outcome within the first 12 h after admission in patients receiving TTM.
Methods
We analyzed data from 103 OHCA patients who subsequently underwent TTM between 2016 and 2022. Patient demographic data, prehospital characteristics, clinical and laboratory parameters were already available in the first 12 h after admission were collected. Following a bootstrap-based predictor selection, we constructed a nonlinear logistic regression model. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling. Discrimination was described using the c-statistic, whereas calibration was characterized by the intercept and slope.
Results
According to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) heart rate (AIC = 9.24, p = 0.0013), age (AIC = 4.39, p = 0.0115), pH (AIC = 3.68, p = 0.0171), initial rhythm (AIC = 4.76, p = 0.0093) and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (AIC = 2.49, p = 0.0342) were associated with 30-day mortality and were used to build our predictive model and nomogram. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for the model was 0.84. The model achieved a C-statistic of 0.7974, with internally validated acceptable calibration (intercept: −0.0190, slope: 0.7772) and low error rates (mean absolute error: 0.040).
Conclusion
The model we have developed may be suitable for early risk assessment of patients receiving TTM as part of primary post-resuscitation care. The calculator needed for scoring can be accessed at the following link: https://www.rapidscore.eu/.
{"title":"Factors predicting mortality in the cardiac ICU during the early phase of targeted temperature management in the treatment of post-cardiac arrest syndrome – The RAPID score","authors":"Bettina Nagy , Ádám Pál-Jakab , Gábor Orbán , Boldizsár Kiss , Alexa Fekete-Győr , Gábor Koós , Béla Merkely , István Hizoh , Enikő Kovács , Endre Zima","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100732","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100732","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain low, and early prognostication is challenging. While numerous intensive care unit scoring systems exist, their utility in the early hours following hospital admission, specifically in the targeted temperature management (TTM) population, is questionable. Our aim was to create a score system that may accurately estimate outcome within the first 12 h after admission in patients receiving TTM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from 103 OHCA patients who subsequently underwent TTM between 2016 and 2022. Patient demographic data, prehospital characteristics, clinical and laboratory parameters were already available in the first 12 h after admission were collected. Following a bootstrap-based predictor selection, we constructed a nonlinear logistic regression model. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling. Discrimination was described using the c-statistic, whereas calibration was characterized by the intercept and slope.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) heart rate (AIC = 9.24, <em>p</em> = 0.0013), age (AIC = 4.39, <em>p</em> = 0.0115), pH (AIC = 3.68, <em>p</em> = 0.0171), initial rhythm (AIC = 4.76, <em>p</em> = 0.0093) and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (AIC = 2.49, <em>p</em> = 0.0342) were associated with 30-day mortality and were used to build our predictive model and nomogram. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for the model was 0.84. The model achieved a C-statistic of 0.7974, with internally validated acceptable calibration (intercept: −0.0190, slope: 0.7772) and low error rates (mean absolute error: 0.040).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The model we have developed may be suitable for early risk assessment of patients receiving TTM as part of primary post-resuscitation care. The calculator needed for scoring can be accessed at the following link: <span><span>https://www.rapidscore.eu/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100732"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001838/pdfft?md5=16dd5ba991c4d0067a3c4cf377552c61&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001838-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141997855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-16DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100745
Alexandra M. Marquez , Marinos Kosmopoulos , Rajat Kalra , Tomaz Goslar , Deborah Jaeger , Christopher Gaisendrees , Alejandra Gutierrez , Gregory Carlisle , Tamas Alexy , Sergey Gurevich , Andrea M. Elliott , Marie E. Steiner , Jason A. Bartos , Davis Seelig , Demetris Yannopoulos
Background
The role of hypothermia in post-arrest neuroprotection is controversial. Animal studies suggest potential benefits with lower temperatures, but high-fidelity ECPR models evaluating temperatures below 30 °C are lacking.
Objectives
To determine whether rapid cooling to 24 °C initiated upon reperfusion reduces brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.
Methods
Twenty-four female pigs had electrically induced VF and mechanical CPR for 30 min. Animals were cannulated for VA-ECMO and cooled to either 34 °C for 4 h (n = 8), 24 °C for 1 h with rewarming to 34 °C over 3 h (n = 7), or 24 °C for 4 h without rewarming (n = 9). Cooling was initiated upon VA-ECMO reperfusion by circulating ice water through the oxygenator. Brain temperature and cerebral and systemic hemodynamics were continuously monitored. After four hours on VA-ECMO, brain tissue was obtained for examination.
Results
Target brain temperature was achieved within 30 min of reperfusion (p = 0.74). Carotid blood flow was higher in the 24 °C without rewarming group throughout the VA-ECMO period compared to 34 °C and 24 °C with rewarming (p < 0.001). Vasopressin requirement was higher in animals treated with 24 °C without rewarming (p = 0.07). Compared to 34 °C, animals treated with 24 °C with rewarming were less coagulopathic and had less immunohistochemistry-detected neurologic injury. There were no differences in global brain injury score.
Conclusions
Despite improvement in carotid blood flow and immunohistochemistry detected neurologic injury, reperfusion at 24 °C with or without rewarming did not reduce early global brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.
{"title":"Mild (34 °C) versus moderate hypothermia (24 °C) in a swine model of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation","authors":"Alexandra M. Marquez , Marinos Kosmopoulos , Rajat Kalra , Tomaz Goslar , Deborah Jaeger , Christopher Gaisendrees , Alejandra Gutierrez , Gregory Carlisle , Tamas Alexy , Sergey Gurevich , Andrea M. Elliott , Marie E. Steiner , Jason A. Bartos , Davis Seelig , Demetris Yannopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100745","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100745","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of hypothermia in post-arrest neuroprotection is controversial. Animal studies suggest potential benefits with lower temperatures, but high-fidelity ECPR models evaluating temperatures below 30 °C are lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether rapid cooling to 24 °C initiated upon reperfusion reduces brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-four female pigs had electrically induced VF and mechanical CPR for 30 min. Animals were cannulated for VA-ECMO and cooled to either 34 °C for 4 h (n = 8), 24 °C for 1 h with rewarming to 34 °C over 3 h (n = 7), or 24 °C for 4 h without rewarming (n = 9). Cooling was initiated upon VA-ECMO reperfusion by circulating ice water through the oxygenator. Brain temperature and cerebral and systemic hemodynamics were continuously monitored. After four hours on VA-ECMO, brain tissue was obtained for examination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Target brain temperature was achieved within 30 min of reperfusion (p = 0.74). Carotid blood flow was higher in the 24 °C without rewarming group throughout the VA-ECMO period compared to 34 °C and 24 °C with rewarming (p < 0.001). Vasopressin requirement was higher in animals treated with 24 °C without rewarming (p = 0.07). Compared to 34 °C, animals treated with 24 °C with rewarming were less coagulopathic and had less immunohistochemistry-detected neurologic injury. There were no differences in global brain injury score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite improvement in carotid blood flow and immunohistochemistry detected neurologic injury, reperfusion at 24 °C with or without rewarming did not reduce early global brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001966/pdfft?md5=44204b55454ac66988872d108a2f545d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001966-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141997856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The influence of the Tokyo Summer Olympic/Paralympic Games on normal emergency medical system operations in Japan had not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, we examined whether out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated during the Tokyo Olympic/Paralympic Games had differences in outcomes.
Methods
Using the nationwide JAAM-OHCA Registry, we evaluated the outcomes of OHCA patients admitted to the hospital during the Tokyo Olympic/Paralympic Games (July 23 to Aug. 8 and Aug. 24 to Sept. 5) in 2021, compared to those during same the dates in 2020 (Term 1: July 23 to Aug. 8 and Aug. 24 to Sept. 5), those during the pre-Olympic/Paralympic term during the same weekdays in the weeks before the event (Term 2: June. 18 to July. 4 and July. 6 to July. 18), and those during the post-Olympic/Paralympic term during the same weekdays in the weeks after the event (Term 3: Sept. 10 to Sept. 26 and Sept. 28 to Oct. 10). The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and multivariable logistic analysis was performed, adjusted for age and sex.
Results
A total of 3,111 OHCA patients were included in the study period (786 in the Olympic/Paralympic group, 774 in Term 1, 747 in Term 2, and 804 in Term 3). Crude 30-day survivals were 7.4% (58/786), 9.3% (72/774), 6.8% (51/747), and 8.2% (66/804), respectively. Using the Olympic/Paralympic group as a reference, multivariable logistic analysis revealed that 30-day survivals in Term 1 (OR 1.27 95% CI 0.88–1.83p = 0.20), Term 2 (OR 0.92 95% CI 0.62–1.36p = 0.67), and Term 3 (OR 1.10 95% CI 0.76–1.59p = 0.63) did not differ significantly.
Conclusions
No significant differences in 30-day survival for OHCA patients admitted during the Tokyo Summer Olympic/Paralympic Games were identified.
{"title":"Survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to the hospital during the Tokyo Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games in Japan","authors":"Takeshi Nishimura, Takuya Taira, Masafumi Suga, Shinichi Ijuin, Akihiko Inoue, Satoshi Ishihara","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100748","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100748","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The influence of the Tokyo Summer Olympic/Paralympic Games on normal emergency medical system operations in Japan had not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, we examined whether out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated during the Tokyo Olympic/Paralympic Games had differences in outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the nationwide JAAM-OHCA Registry, we evaluated the outcomes of OHCA patients admitted to the hospital during the Tokyo Olympic/Paralympic Games (July 23 to Aug. 8 and Aug. 24 to Sept. 5) in 2021, compared to those during same the dates in 2020 (Term 1: July 23 to Aug. 8 and Aug. 24 to Sept. 5), those during the pre-Olympic/Paralympic term during the same weekdays in the weeks before the event (Term 2: June. 18 to July. 4 and July. 6 to July. 18), and those during the post-Olympic/Paralympic term during the same weekdays in the weeks after the event (Term 3: Sept. 10 to Sept. 26 and Sept. 28 to Oct. 10). The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and multivariable logistic analysis was performed, adjusted for age and sex.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 3,111 OHCA patients were included in the study period (786 in the Olympic/Paralympic group, 774 in Term 1, 747 in Term 2, and 804 in Term 3). Crude 30-day survivals were 7.4% (58/786), 9.3% (72/774), 6.8% (51/747), and 8.2% (66/804), respectively. Using the Olympic/Paralympic group as a reference, multivariable logistic analysis revealed that 30-day survivals in Term 1 (OR 1.27 95% CI 0.88–1.83p = 0.20), Term 2 (OR 0.92 95% CI 0.62–1.36p = 0.67), and Term 3 (OR 1.10 95% CI 0.76–1.59p = 0.63) did not differ significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No significant differences in 30-day survival for OHCA patients admitted during the Tokyo Summer Olympic/Paralympic Games were identified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001991/pdfft?md5=e455f0e3790e9aad724a920fbe31d062&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001991-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141993255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grey-white matter ratio (GWR) measured by head computed tomography (CT) scan is known as a neurological prognostication tool for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. The prognostic value of GWR obtained early (within two hours after return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC]) remains a matter of debate.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study at five hospitals. We included adult OHCA survivors who underwent head CT within two hours following ROSC. GWR values were measured using head CT. Average GWR values were calculated by the mean of the GWR-basal ganglia and GWR-Cerebrum. We divided the patients into poor or favorable neurological outcome groups defined by Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category scores. The predictive accuracy of GWR performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The sensitivities and specificities for predicting poor outcome were examined.
Results
Of 377 eligible patients, 281 (74.5%) showed poor neurological outcomes at one month after ROSC. Average GWR values of the poor neurological outcome group were significantly lower than those of the favorable neurological outcome. The average GWR value to predict neurological outcome with Youden index was 1.24 with AUC of 0.799. When average GWR values were 1.15 or lower, poor neurological outcomes could be predicted with 100% specificity.
Conclusions
GWR values measured by head CT scans early (within two hours after ROSC) demonstrated moderate predictive performance for overall ROSC patients. When limited to the patients with GWR values of 1.15 or lower, poor neurological outcomes could be predicted with high specificity.
{"title":"Prognostic value of grey-white matter ratio obtained within two hours after return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: A multicenter, observational study","authors":"Yuya Murakami , Takashi Hongo , Tetsuya Yumoto , Yoshinori Kosaki , Atsuyoshi Iida , Hiroki Maeyama , Fumiya Inoue , Toshihisa Ichiba , Atsunori Nakao , Hiromichi Naito","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100746","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Grey-white matter ratio (GWR) measured by head computed tomography (CT) scan is known as a neurological prognostication tool for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. The prognostic value of GWR obtained early (within two hours after return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC]) remains a matter of debate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study at five hospitals. We included adult OHCA survivors who underwent head CT within two hours following ROSC. GWR values were measured using head CT. Average GWR values were calculated by the mean of the GWR-basal ganglia and GWR-Cerebrum. We divided the patients into poor or favorable neurological outcome groups defined by Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category scores. The predictive accuracy of GWR performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The sensitivities and specificities for predicting poor outcome were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 377 eligible patients, 281 (74.5%) showed poor neurological outcomes at one month after ROSC. Average GWR values of the poor neurological outcome group were significantly lower than those of the favorable neurological outcome. The average GWR value to predict neurological outcome with Youden index was 1.24 with AUC of 0.799. When average GWR values were 1.15 or lower, poor neurological outcomes could be predicted with 100% specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GWR values measured by head CT scans early (within two hours after ROSC) demonstrated moderate predictive performance for overall ROSC patients. When limited to the patients with GWR values of 1.15 or lower, poor neurological outcomes could be predicted with high specificity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001978/pdfft?md5=afd848acc9ee1940504fbed5cff98c53&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001978-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141993254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-10DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100744
Sebastian Schnaubelt, Kathryn Eastwood, Robert Greif
{"title":"Author’s response to Letter to the Editor ‘Can the chain of survival start with environment safety for special circumstances’","authors":"Sebastian Schnaubelt, Kathryn Eastwood, Robert Greif","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100744","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100744","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001954/pdfft?md5=06c32ac97a2c033ff7ccc20d01302007&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001954-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141963871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-10DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100737
Kanjit Leungsuwan, Kory R. Heier, Olivia Henderson, Karam Ayoub, Talal Alnabelsi, Emily Slade, Vedant A. Gupta
Background
Post cardiac arrest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is routinely assessed, but the implications of this are unknown. This study aimed to assess the association between post cardiac arrest LVEF and survival to hospital discharge.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, all in-hospital and out of hospital cardiac arrests at our tertiary care center between January 2012 and September 2015 were included. Baseline demographics, clinical data, characteristics of the arrest, and interventions performed were collected. Earliest post cardiac arrest echocardiograms were reviewed with LVEF documented. The primary outcome was survival to discharge.
Results
A total of 736 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 58 years, 44% female). 15% were out of hospital cardiac arrest (24% shockable rhythm). After adjusting for covariates, patients with LVEF < 30% had 36% lower odds of surviving to hospital discharge than those with LVEF 52% (p = 0.014). Shockable initial rhythm and targeted temperature management were associated with improved survival.
Conclusion
After a cardiac arrest, an initial LVEF < 30% is associated with significantly lower odds of survival to hospital discharge.
{"title":"Post cardiac arrest left ventricular ejection fraction associated with survival to discharge","authors":"Kanjit Leungsuwan, Kory R. Heier, Olivia Henderson, Karam Ayoub, Talal Alnabelsi, Emily Slade, Vedant A. Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100737","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100737","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Post cardiac arrest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is routinely assessed, but the implications of this are unknown. This study aimed to assess the association between post cardiac arrest LVEF and survival to hospital discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, all in-hospital and out of hospital cardiac arrests at our tertiary care center between January 2012 and September 2015 were included. Baseline demographics, clinical data, characteristics of the arrest, and interventions performed were collected. Earliest post cardiac arrest echocardiograms were reviewed with LVEF documented. The primary outcome was survival to discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 736 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 58 years, 44% female). 15% were out of hospital cardiac arrest (24% shockable rhythm). After adjusting for covariates, patients with LVEF < 30% had 36% lower odds of surviving to hospital discharge than those with LVEF <span><math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow></math></span> 52% (p = 0.014). Shockable initial rhythm and targeted temperature management were associated with improved survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>After a cardiac arrest, an initial LVEF < 30% is associated with significantly lower odds of survival to hospital discharge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001887/pdfft?md5=6ecce350e71ada527cadf38b9f71b1e1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001887-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100743
Da-Long Chen , Yu-Kai Lin , Chia-Ing Li , Guei-Jane Wang , Kuan-Cheng Chang
Aims
To assess whether mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), can help improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Methods
This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Adult patients with OHCA admitted between January 2015 and June 2023. Quantitative score of vasoactive-inotropic agents and qualitative interventions of MCS, including IABP and ECMO after OHCA. Multivariate regression evaluated the efficacy of each MCS approach in patients stratified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS).
Results
A total of 334 patients were included and analyzed, 122 (36.5%) had favorable neurological outcomes and 215 (64.4%) survived ≥90 days. These patients were stratified by VIS: 0–25, 26–100, 101–250, and >250. In patients with a VIS > 100, ECMO with or without IABP ensured favorable neurological outcomes and survival after OHCA compared to non-MCS interventions (p < 0.001). For patients with a VIS ≤ 100, IABP alone was beneficial, with no significant outcome difference from non-MCS interventions (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
ECMO with or without IABP therapy may improve post-OHCA neurological outcomes and survival in patients with an expected VIS-24 h > 100 (e.g., epinephrine dose reaches 3 mg during CPR).
{"title":"Impact of mechanical circulatory support on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes stratified by vasoactive-inotropic score: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Da-Long Chen , Yu-Kai Lin , Chia-Ing Li , Guei-Jane Wang , Kuan-Cheng Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100743","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100743","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To assess whether mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), can help improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Adult patients with OHCA admitted between January 2015 and June 2023. Quantitative score of vasoactive-inotropic agents and qualitative interventions of MCS, including IABP and ECMO after OHCA. Multivariate regression evaluated the efficacy of each MCS approach in patients stratified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 334 patients were included and analyzed, 122 (36.5%) had favorable neurological outcomes and 215 (64.4%) survived ≥90 days. These patients were stratified by VIS: 0–25, 26–100, 101–250, and >250. In patients with a VIS > 100, ECMO with or without IABP ensured favorable neurological outcomes and survival after OHCA compared to non-MCS interventions (<em>p</em> < 0.001). For patients with a VIS ≤ 100, IABP alone was beneficial, with no significant outcome difference from non-MCS interventions (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ECMO with or without IABP therapy may improve post-OHCA neurological outcomes and survival in patients with an expected VIS-24 h > 100 (e.g., epinephrine dose reaches 3 mg during CPR).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001942/pdfft?md5=392c83af116cfa9a35eca76b35ef4e49&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001942-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141963066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100739
G. Debaty , GD. Perkins , K.N. Dainty , T. Norii , T.M. Olasveengen , J.E. Bray , International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force
Background
Ultraportable automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are a new generation of defibrillators that are small, lightweight, easy to carry on one’s person, and affordable for personal and home use. They offer the opportunity to increase AED availability in case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and therefore improve outcomes.
We aimed to review evidence supporting the potential effect on outcomes and the performance of these ultraportable AEDs.
Methods
We searched Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 2012 to July 4th, 2024 to identify any studies related to ultraportable AED. The population was adult and children with OHCA who were treated with an ultra-portable AED. All outcomes were accepted. We limited study designs to randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Data charting was done by the primary author using standardized data abstraction forms.
Results
The search strategy identified 54 studies (Pubmed = 26, Embase = 28, with 19 duplicates). We included three articles in the final review. One study was a medico-economic simulation study including 600,000 simulated patients, one is the study protocol of cluster randomized trial of providing ultraportable AEDs to first responders and one is an abstract with preliminary results of this trial reporting 1805 community responders recruited, 903 allocated to ultraportable AED. No studies to date have reported patient outcomes.
Conclusion
This review found no evidence of ultraportable AED device performance, clinical or safety outcomes. There is an urgent need for further research to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultraportable AEDs.
{"title":"Effectiveness of ultraportable automated external defibrillators: A scoping review","authors":"G. Debaty , GD. Perkins , K.N. Dainty , T. Norii , T.M. Olasveengen , J.E. Bray , International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100739","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100739","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ultraportable automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are a new generation of defibrillators that are small, lightweight, easy to carry on one’s person, and affordable for personal and home use. They offer the opportunity to increase AED availability in case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and therefore improve outcomes.</p><p>We aimed to review evidence supporting the potential effect on outcomes and the performance of these ultraportable AEDs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 2012 to July 4th, 2024 to identify any studies related to ultraportable AED. The population was adult and children with OHCA who were treated with an ultra-portable AED. All outcomes were accepted. We limited study designs to randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Data charting was done by the primary author using standardized data abstraction forms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search strategy identified 54 studies (Pubmed = 26, Embase = 28, with 19 duplicates). We included three articles in the final review. One study was a medico-economic simulation study including 600,000 simulated patients, one is the study protocol of cluster randomized trial of providing ultraportable AEDs to first responders and one is an abstract with preliminary results of this trial reporting 1805 community responders recruited, 903 allocated to ultraportable AED. No studies to date have reported patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review found no evidence of ultraportable AED device performance, clinical or safety outcomes. There is an urgent need for further research to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultraportable AEDs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001905/pdfft?md5=02953dda5bf318a5d526eea861513467&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001905-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141952674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}