首页 > 最新文献

Vascular and endovascular surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Endovascular Skirt Reconstruction of Aortoiliac Bifurcation Using Bare-nitinol Stents: ESCORT Technique. 裸镍钛诺支架血管内支架重建主动脉髂分叉:ESCORT技术。
IF 0.7 Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-01 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251339967
Takenobu Shimada, Yoshihisa Shimada, Daisuke Tonomura, Kazunori Terashita, Yuki Yamanaka, Daiju Fukuda

BackgroundEndovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is still challenging. We propose a stent deployment technique for AIOD using only bare-nitinol stents (BNSs) in a form that is ultimately similar to the normal aortoiliac bifurcation structure.Methods and case seriesThe Endovascular Skirt reCOnstruction of aoRToiliac bifurcation using bare-nitinol stents (ESCORT) technique involves primary implantation of a large BNS, with its distal edge being placed just at the edge of the carina by mounting onto 2 pull-through guidewires from the side of an upper extremity followed by V-stenting using BNSs into the pre-implanted BNS at the terminal aorta. The results of experiments showed that this technique can be achieved by the unique structural characteristic of an E-Luminexx Vascular stent (BD, Tempe, AZ, USA) as a main body in which the stent edge can be advanced beyond the catheter tip. This technique without using stent grafts can avoid recrossing of the jailed guidewire and can reduce the procedural and long-term care that is necessary when using stent grafts, and a future cross-over approach may be established also after treatment. Between 2017 and 2021, the ESCORT technique was performed in 7 consecutive cases of AIOD at our institute. The procedural success rate was 100%, and no complication occurred in any of the patients. Symptom resolution was obtained in all patients. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 1 patient with extremely severe calcified lesions. Except for the 1 case requiring TLR, at least 2-year patency was confirmed in patients who were followed up. The establishment of a cross-over system was tried in 2 patients after the procedure, and it was successful in both cases.ConclusionThe ESCORT technique for AIOD is a feasible and beneficial stenting strategy.

背景:主动脉髂闭塞性疾病(AIOD)的血管治疗仍然具有挑战性。我们提出一种用于AIOD的支架部署技术,仅使用裸镍钛诺支架(bns),其形式最终类似于正常的主动脉-髂分叉结构。方法和病例系列使用裸镍钛诺支架(ESCORT)技术进行主动脉髂分叉血管内支架重建,包括首先植入一个大的BNS,将其远端边缘放置在隆突边缘,从上肢侧面安装到2根可拉过的导丝上,然后将BNS放置在末段主动脉预植入的BNS上。实验结果表明,该技术可以通过E-Luminexx血管支架(BD, Tempe, AZ, USA)作为主体的独特结构特性来实现,其中支架边缘可以超前于导管尖端。这种不使用支架移植的技术可以避免被监禁的导丝的再交叉,并且可以减少使用支架移植时所需的程序和长期护理,并且在治疗后也可以建立未来的交叉入路。2017年至2021年,我院连续7例AIOD患者采用了ESCORT技术。手术成功率100%,无并发症发生。所有患者均获得症状缓解。靶区血管重建术(TLR)治疗1例极严重钙化病变。除1例需要TLR外,随访患者至少2年通畅。术后2例患者尝试建立交叉系统,均取得成功。结论ESCORT技术是一种可行、有益的AIOD支架植入术策略。
{"title":"Endovascular Skirt Reconstruction of Aortoiliac Bifurcation Using Bare-nitinol Stents: ESCORT Technique.","authors":"Takenobu Shimada, Yoshihisa Shimada, Daisuke Tonomura, Kazunori Terashita, Yuki Yamanaka, Daiju Fukuda","doi":"10.1177/15385744251339967","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251339967","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEndovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is still challenging. We propose a stent deployment technique for AIOD using only bare-nitinol stents (BNSs) in a form that is ultimately similar to the normal aortoiliac bifurcation structure.Methods and case seriesThe Endovascular Skirt reCOnstruction of aoRToiliac bifurcation using bare-nitinol stents (ESCORT) technique involves primary implantation of a large BNS, with its distal edge being placed just at the edge of the carina by mounting onto 2 pull-through guidewires from the side of an upper extremity followed by V-stenting using BNSs into the pre-implanted BNS at the terminal aorta. The results of experiments showed that this technique can be achieved by the unique structural characteristic of an E-Luminexx Vascular stent (BD, Tempe, AZ, USA) as a main body in which the stent edge can be advanced beyond the catheter tip. This technique without using stent grafts can avoid recrossing of the jailed guidewire and can reduce the procedural and long-term care that is necessary when using stent grafts, and a future cross-over approach may be established also after treatment. Between 2017 and 2021, the ESCORT technique was performed in 7 consecutive cases of AIOD at our institute. The procedural success rate was 100%, and no complication occurred in any of the patients. Symptom resolution was obtained in all patients. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 1 patient with extremely severe calcified lesions. Except for the 1 case requiring TLR, at least 2-year patency was confirmed in patients who were followed up. The establishment of a cross-over system was tried in 2 patients after the procedure, and it was successful in both cases.ConclusionThe ESCORT technique for AIOD is a feasible and beneficial stenting strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"725-732"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144060858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes in Endovascular Management of May Thurner Syndrome Without Access to IVUS in a Latin American Cohort: A Retrospective Study. 一项回顾性研究:在拉丁美洲队列中,未使用IVUS的May Thurner综合征的血管内治疗结果。
IF 0.7 Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251355218
Mariana Pinzón-Pinto, Esteban Portilla-Rojas, Angie Ebratt, Juan Miguel Mutis-Toro, Daniela Arévalo-Montaño, Martín Contreras, Leonardo Randial, Luis-Felipe Cabrera-Vargas

Introduction and ObjectiveMay Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a condition characterized by left iliofemoral vein compression, often leading to lower limb symptoms and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular management for symptomatic, non-thrombotic MTS in a Latin American population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study analyzed 43 patients with MTS who underwent endovascular stenting and anticoagulation between 2018 and 2023 in Bogotá, Colombia. Clinical data, including demographics, symptoms, and comorbidities, were collected. Perioperative outcomes, such as procedure time, complications, and length of stay, were recorded. Postoperative follow-up included stent patency, symptom resolution, and the occurrence of complications.ResultsEndovascular management demonstrated high efficacy, with 83.7% of patients achieving symptom resolution and 100% stent patency at 6 months. No major complications were reported. The average procedure time was 52.6 minutes, and patients were discharged within 1 day of the procedure.ConclusionEarly intervention with endovascular embolization is crucial for patients with MTS and symptomatic pelvic varices. This approach offers a safe and effective solution for managing the condition and preventing complications. The presence of symptoms should be considered an indication for endovascular intervention, rather than waiting for thrombosis development.

简介与目的may Thurner综合征(MTS)是一种以左髂股静脉压迫为特征的疾病,常导致下肢症状和并发症。本研究旨在评估拉丁美洲人群中有症状的非血栓性MTS的血管内治疗结果。方法回顾性队列研究分析了2018年至2023年在哥伦比亚波哥大接受血管内支架植入术和抗凝治疗的43例MTS患者。收集临床资料,包括人口统计学、症状和合并症。记录围手术期结果,如手术时间、并发症和住院时间。术后随访包括支架通畅、症状缓解及并发症发生情况。结果血管管理效果良好,6个月时83.7%的患者症状缓解,支架通畅率100%。无重大并发症报道。平均手术时间52.6分钟,术后1天内出院。结论MTS合并症状性盆腔静脉曲张的早期介入治疗至关重要。这种方法为控制病情和预防并发症提供了一种安全有效的解决方案。症状的出现应被视为血管内干预的指征,而不是等待血栓形成。
{"title":"Outcomes in Endovascular Management of May Thurner Syndrome Without Access to IVUS in a Latin American Cohort: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mariana Pinzón-Pinto, Esteban Portilla-Rojas, Angie Ebratt, Juan Miguel Mutis-Toro, Daniela Arévalo-Montaño, Martín Contreras, Leonardo Randial, Luis-Felipe Cabrera-Vargas","doi":"10.1177/15385744251355218","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251355218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction and ObjectiveMay Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a condition characterized by left iliofemoral vein compression, often leading to lower limb symptoms and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular management for symptomatic, non-thrombotic MTS in a Latin American population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study analyzed 43 patients with MTS who underwent endovascular stenting and anticoagulation between 2018 and 2023 in Bogotá, Colombia. Clinical data, including demographics, symptoms, and comorbidities, were collected. Perioperative outcomes, such as procedure time, complications, and length of stay, were recorded. Postoperative follow-up included stent patency, symptom resolution, and the occurrence of complications.ResultsEndovascular management demonstrated high efficacy, with 83.7% of patients achieving symptom resolution and 100% stent patency at 6 months. No major complications were reported. The average procedure time was 52.6 minutes, and patients were discharged within 1 day of the procedure.ConclusionEarly intervention with endovascular embolization is crucial for patients with MTS and symptomatic pelvic varices. This approach offers a safe and effective solution for managing the condition and preventing complications. The presence of symptoms should be considered an indication for endovascular intervention, rather than waiting for thrombosis development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"690-694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144510208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Caprini and Worcester Scores for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in the Setting of Ambulatory Endovenous Surgery. 静脉血栓栓塞风险分层的capriini和Worcester评分在门诊静脉内手术中的比较。
IF 0.7 Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251375263
Megan Power Foley, Daniel Westby, Oisín Brennan, Emily Boyle, Stewart R Walsh

IntroductionPost-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant concern after endovenous ablation (EVA) for varicose veins. Risk stratification tools aid identifying which patients have an increased VTE risk. There is no consensus on which currently utilised score is most appropriate for daycase surgery. The aim of this observational study was to compare how 2 institutions utilised the Caprini and Worcester Scores to risk stratify ambulatory EVA patients in real-world practice.MethodsA retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing truncal ablation under local anaesthetic in 2 separate vascular centres between 2022-23 was performed. Each patient was scored prospectively using either the Caprini and Worcester Score for perioperative VTE risk assessment, and then retrospectively using the alternate tool. Demographics and risk factors were documented and compared between patients categorised as "at risk" by each score. Categorical variables were analysed using Chi-Square and continuous using Mann-Whitney U Tests.ResultsTwo hundred patients undergoing endovenous ablation were included. Over half the cohort were female (n = 122, 61%) and the median age was 53.0 years (range 23-87). Twenty-one percent (n = 42) had a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30. Overall, 90 patients were flagged as high-risk by either score. Fifty-three patients (26.5%) were flagged by the Worcester Score as either 'moderate' (n = 42, 21%) or 'high risk' (n = 11, 5.5%). Fifty-eight patients (29%) were identified as 'high risk' by the Caprini tool. A significant discrepancy in which patients were categorised as "at risk" by each score was noted, with only 21 patients stratified as "at risk" by both (P = 0.047).ConclusionsA similar proportion of patients were stratified as high risk by each score, however the lack of overlap between the 2 risk assessment tools suggests a discrepancy in what variables are scored for. Further well-powered studies are needed to validate which score is most appropriate for ambulatory EVA.

静脉曲张静脉内消融(EVA)术后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)仍然是一个值得关注的问题。风险分层工具有助于确定哪些患者有静脉血栓栓塞风险增加。目前使用的评分最适合日间手术,尚无共识。本观察性研究的目的是比较两家机构如何在现实世界的实践中使用capriini和Worcester评分对动态EVA患者进行风险分层。方法回顾性分析2022-23年间在2个独立血管中心局部麻醉下连续行截骨消融的患者。每位患者使用capriti和Worcester评分进行围手术期静脉血栓栓塞风险评估,然后使用替代工具进行回顾性评分。统计数据和危险因素被记录下来,并在按每个分数归类为“有危险”的患者之间进行比较。分类变量分析采用卡方检验,连续分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验。结果共纳入200例静脉内消融术患者。超过一半的队列为女性(n = 122, 61%),中位年龄为53.0岁(范围23-87)。21% (n = 42)的人身体质量指数(BMI)超过30。总的来说,有90名患者被标记为高风险。53名患者(26.5%)被伍斯特评分标记为“中度”(n = 42,21%)或“高风险”(n = 11,5.5%)。58名患者(29%)被capriti工具确定为“高风险”。两种评分将患者归为“有危险”的差异显著,只有21例患者被两种评分都归为“有危险”(P = 0.047)。结论两种风险评估工具均有相似比例的患者被划分为高危人群,但两种风险评估工具之间缺乏重叠,这表明两种风险评估工具在对哪些变量进行评分时存在差异。需要进一步的有力研究来验证哪个分数最适合动态EVA。
{"title":"Comparison of Caprini and Worcester Scores for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in the Setting of Ambulatory Endovenous Surgery.","authors":"Megan Power Foley, Daniel Westby, Oisín Brennan, Emily Boyle, Stewart R Walsh","doi":"10.1177/15385744251375263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251375263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPost-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant concern after endovenous ablation (EVA) for varicose veins. Risk stratification tools aid identifying which patients have an increased VTE risk. There is no consensus on which currently utilised score is most appropriate for daycase surgery. The aim of this observational study was to compare how 2 institutions utilised the Caprini and Worcester Scores to risk stratify ambulatory EVA patients in real-world practice.MethodsA retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing truncal ablation under local anaesthetic in 2 separate vascular centres between 2022-23 was performed. Each patient was scored prospectively using either the Caprini and Worcester Score for perioperative VTE risk assessment, and then retrospectively using the alternate tool. Demographics and risk factors were documented and compared between patients categorised as \"at risk\" by each score. Categorical variables were analysed using Chi-Square and continuous using Mann-Whitney U Tests.ResultsTwo hundred patients undergoing endovenous ablation were included. Over half the cohort were female (n = 122, 61%) and the median age was 53.0 years (range 23-87). Twenty-one percent (n = 42) had a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30. Overall, 90 patients were flagged as high-risk by either score. Fifty-three patients (26.5%) were flagged by the Worcester Score as either 'moderate' (n = 42, 21%) or 'high risk' (n = 11, 5.5%). Fifty-eight patients (29%) were identified as 'high risk' by the Caprini tool. A significant discrepancy in which patients were categorised as \"at risk\" by each score was noted, with only 21 patients stratified as \"at risk\" by both (<i>P</i> = 0.047).ConclusionsA similar proportion of patients were stratified as high risk by each score, however the lack of overlap between the 2 risk assessment tools suggests a discrepancy in what variables are scored for. Further well-powered studies are needed to validate which score is most appropriate for ambulatory EVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251375263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
POSToperative CerebrovascUlar Accident Following Symptomatic Carotid EndarterectoMy (OSTIUM): A Retrospective Case-Control Study. 症状性颈动脉内膜切除术后脑血管意外:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
IF 0.7 Pub Date : 2025-08-02 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251367540
Kausik Chatterjee, Jack Hood, Abhijit Das, Ragai R Makar, Bhavana Selvarajah, Andrew Irwin Khallaf, Kumar Pulupula, Parthasarathy Karunakarana, Joanna Heyworth, Georgia Farrag, Allam Harfoush, Alakendu Sekhar

BackgroundAlthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is effective for moderate to severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, it carries a risk of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (POCVA). Currently, there is insufficient evidence on the relationship between cranial vascular integrity and intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, we utilised data collected from patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid artery disease between December 2005 and October 2019 in the South Mersey Arterial Centre, UK. Patients with three-dimensional CT angiogram data and evidence of postoperative stroke were considered as cases and matched with those without such evidence considered as controls. 3D-CTA data were analysed following a structured pro-forma and data regarding haemodynamic changes were obtained from operative notes. Variables that showed statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 21 cases and 55 matched controls were identified. Presence of atherosclerotic disease in the vertebral arteries on either side, intracranial atherosclerosis and a drop in the systolic blood pressure were significantly different between cases and controls. Our multivariate logistic regression models indicated that the likelihood of stroke was higher with vertebral artery (V1-V4) stenosis on either side (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-24.6) and an intraoperative systolic blood pressure drop greater than 44 mmHg (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-27.6).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of evaluating posterior circulation abnormalities in POCVA. Moreover, careful intraoperative blood pressure management is crucial in perioperative care. This may aid in developing personalised risk stratification and enhancing intraoperative monitoring during CEA.

背景:尽管颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)对中度至重度症状性颈动脉狭窄是有效的,但它存在术后脑血管意外(POCVA)的风险。目前,颅血管完整性与术中血流动力学波动之间的关系尚缺乏证据。方法在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们利用了2005年12月至2019年10月在英国南默西动脉中心接受CEA治疗的症状性颈动脉疾病患者的数据。有三维CT血管造影资料和术后卒中证据的患者作为病例,与没有这些证据的患者作为对照。3D-CTA数据根据结构化的形式进行分析,并从手术记录中获得有关血流动力学变化的数据。单因素分析中有统计学意义的变量纳入多因素logistic回归分析。结果共鉴定出21例病例和55例对照。两侧椎动脉存在动脉粥样硬化疾病、颅内动脉粥样硬化和收缩压下降在病例和对照组之间有显著差异。我们的多因素logistic回归模型显示,卒中的可能性较高的椎动脉(V1-V4)狭窄的任何一侧(OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-24.6)和术中收缩压下降大于44 mmHg (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-27.6)。结论这些发现强调了评估POCVA后循环异常的重要性。此外,仔细的术中血压管理是围手术期护理的关键。这可能有助于发展个性化的风险分层和加强术中监测CEA。
{"title":"POSToperative CerebrovascUlar Accident Following Symptomatic Carotid EndarterectoMy (OSTIUM): A Retrospective Case-Control Study.","authors":"Kausik Chatterjee, Jack Hood, Abhijit Das, Ragai R Makar, Bhavana Selvarajah, Andrew Irwin Khallaf, Kumar Pulupula, Parthasarathy Karunakarana, Joanna Heyworth, Georgia Farrag, Allam Harfoush, Alakendu Sekhar","doi":"10.1177/15385744251367540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251367540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is effective for moderate to severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, it carries a risk of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (POCVA). Currently, there is insufficient evidence on the relationship between cranial vascular integrity and intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, we utilised data collected from patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid artery disease between December 2005 and October 2019 in the South Mersey Arterial Centre, UK. Patients with three-dimensional CT angiogram data and evidence of postoperative stroke were considered as cases and matched with those without such evidence considered as controls. 3D-CTA data were analysed following a structured pro-forma and data regarding haemodynamic changes were obtained from operative notes. Variables that showed statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 21 cases and 55 matched controls were identified. Presence of atherosclerotic disease in the vertebral arteries on either side, intracranial atherosclerosis and a drop in the systolic blood pressure were significantly different between cases and controls. Our multivariate logistic regression models indicated that the likelihood of stroke was higher with vertebral artery (V1-V4) stenosis on either side (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-24.6) and an intraoperative systolic blood pressure drop greater than 44 mmHg (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-27.6).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of evaluating posterior circulation abnormalities in POCVA. Moreover, careful intraoperative blood pressure management is crucial in perioperative care. This may aid in developing personalised risk stratification and enhancing intraoperative monitoring during CEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251367540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144769516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endovascular Treatment of Common Iliac Aneurysm After Aortobifemoral Bypass: Banana Technique and Shape Memory Polymer Plug Embolization. 主动脉股动脉搭桥术后髂常见动脉瘤的血管内治疗:香蕉技术与形状记忆聚合物栓塞。
Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251326310
Sergio Asensio, Jose Antonio Brizuela, Alvaro Revilla, Sergio Fernández-Bello, James Henry Taylor, Enrique Maria San Norberto

Objective: This case report aims to present a new endovascular technique for arterial embolization using a relatively recently developed endovascular device, Shape Memory Polymer (SMP) Embolization Plug (IMPEDE, Shape Memory Medical). Methods: A 66-year-old man presented an asymptomatic common iliac aneurysm with a maximun diameter of 4.4 cm and a previous aorto-bifemoral bypass. Results: An embolization of the common iliac artery aneurysm with 5 units of IMPEDE-FX Rapid Fill (12 mm, Shape Memory Medical) and revascularization from external iliac artery to internal iliac artery through a banana technique with an auto-expandable covered stent (Viabahn 10 × 100 mm, Gore) was performed. Conclusion: The experience obtained after the use of this device has allowed us to increase the therapeutic arsenal for high volume aneurysm embolization.

目的:本病例报告旨在介绍一种新的血管内栓塞技术,使用一种相对较新开发的血管内装置,形状记忆聚合物(SMP)栓塞塞(阻碍,形状记忆医学)。方法:66岁男性,无症状髂总动脉瘤,最大直径4.4 cm,既往行主动脉-双侧旁路手术。结果:采用5个单位的IMPEDE-FX快速填充(12 mm, Shape Memory Medical)栓塞髂总动脉瘤,并通过香蕉技术采用自动可扩张覆盖支架(Viabahn 10 × 100 mm, Gore)从髂外动脉到髂内动脉进行血运重建术。结论:使用该装置后获得的经验使我们增加了大容量动脉瘤栓塞的治疗武器库。
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of Common Iliac Aneurysm After Aortobifemoral Bypass: Banana Technique and Shape Memory Polymer Plug Embolization.","authors":"Sergio Asensio, Jose Antonio Brizuela, Alvaro Revilla, Sergio Fernández-Bello, James Henry Taylor, Enrique Maria San Norberto","doi":"10.1177/15385744251326310","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251326310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This case report aims to present a new endovascular technique for arterial embolization using a relatively recently developed endovascular device, Shape Memory Polymer (SMP) Embolization Plug (IMPEDE, Shape Memory Medical). <b>Methods:</b> A 66-year-old man presented an asymptomatic common iliac aneurysm with a maximun diameter of 4.4 cm and a previous aorto-bifemoral bypass. <b>Results:</b> An embolization of the common iliac artery aneurysm with 5 units of IMPEDE-FX Rapid Fill (12 mm, Shape Memory Medical) and revascularization from external iliac artery to internal iliac artery through a banana technique with an auto-expandable covered stent (Viabahn 10 × 100 mm, Gore) was performed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The experience obtained after the use of this device has allowed us to increase the therapeutic arsenal for high volume aneurysm embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"667-670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144035578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetic Diagnosis and Combinational Treatment With Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Non-cirrhotic and Non-malignant Portal Vein Thrombosis. 非肝硬化和非恶性门静脉血栓的基因诊断及药物力学取栓和经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术的联合治疗。
Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251334793
Feng Chen, Qing Gen Xiong, Fei Lu, Zhi Jian Luo, Wei Luo, Wei Zhou

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the potential role of the whole-exome sequencing (WES) technique in screening pathogenic genes of non-cirrhotic and non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the clinical efficacy of AngioJet-assisted pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) to treat this disease.Methods16 patients with acute non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT were retrospectively analyzed. 14 patients received genetically diagnosed using the WES technique, ten patients received PMT with or without TIPS and 6 cases received anticoagulation alone. Changes in clinical symptoms, and recanalization of the portal vein (PV) were also recorded.Results4 patients (28.6%) had JAK2 V617 F mutation, 4 patients (28.6%) had PROC mutations, 3 patients (21.4%) had SERPINC1mutations. Among patients treated with anticoagulation alone, 5 patients (83.3%, 5/6) developed cavernous transformation of PV and one patient with JAK2 V617 F mutation achieved complete recanalization of PV. One patient treated with PMT without TIPS developed PV cavernous transformation, eight patients (80%) treated with PMT and TIPS achieved complete or partial recanalization of PV. Three patients who developed intestinal necrosis all had SERPINC1 mutations and one of them died of intestinal necrosis. No recurrence was found during follow-up (1-36 months).ConclusionsThe WES technique offers a promising way to screen for thrombophilia in patients with non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT. Patients with SERPINC1 mutations are more inclined to develop intestinal necrosis than others. PMT combined with TIPS provides a safe and effective therapeutic alternative.

目的探讨全外显子组测序(WES)技术在筛选非肝硬化非恶性门静脉血栓形成(PVT)致病基因中的潜在作用,以及血管喷射辅助药物力学取栓(PMT)联合经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统支架分流术(TIPS)治疗门静脉血栓形成的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析16例急性非肝硬化非恶性PVT患者的临床资料。14例患者采用WES技术进行基因诊断,10例患者接受PMT合并或不合并TIPS, 6例患者单独接受抗凝治疗。临床症状的变化和门静脉再通的情况也被记录下来。结果JAK2 V617 F突变4例(28.6%),PROC突变4例(28.6%),serinc1突变3例(21.4%)。在单独抗凝治疗的患者中,5例(83.3%,5/6)发生PV海绵状转化,1例JAK2 V617 F突变患者实现PV完全再通。1例不加TIPS的PMT患者发生PV海绵状变性,8例(80%)PMT加TIPS患者实现PV完全或部分再通。3例肠坏死患者均有serpin1突变,其中1例死于肠坏死。随访1 ~ 36个月无复发。结论WES技术为筛查非肝硬化非恶性ppt患者的血栓形成提供了一种很有前景的方法,serpin1突变患者比其他患者更容易发生肠坏死。PMT联合TIPS提供了一种安全有效的治疗选择。
{"title":"Genetic Diagnosis and Combinational Treatment With Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Non-cirrhotic and Non-malignant Portal Vein Thrombosis.","authors":"Feng Chen, Qing Gen Xiong, Fei Lu, Zhi Jian Luo, Wei Luo, Wei Zhou","doi":"10.1177/15385744251334793","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251334793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the potential role of the whole-exome sequencing (WES) technique in screening pathogenic genes of non-cirrhotic and non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the clinical efficacy of AngioJet-assisted pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) to treat this disease.Methods16 patients with acute non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT were retrospectively analyzed. 14 patients received genetically diagnosed using the WES technique, ten patients received PMT with or without TIPS and 6 cases received anticoagulation alone. Changes in clinical symptoms, and recanalization of the portal vein (PV) were also recorded.Results4 patients (28.6%) had JAK2 V617 F mutation, 4 patients (28.6%) had PROC mutations, 3 patients (21.4%) had SERPINC1mutations. Among patients treated with anticoagulation alone, 5 patients (83.3%, 5/6) developed cavernous transformation of PV and one patient with JAK2 V617 F mutation achieved complete recanalization of PV. One patient treated with PMT without TIPS developed PV cavernous transformation, eight patients (80%) treated with PMT and TIPS achieved complete or partial recanalization of PV. Three patients who developed intestinal necrosis all had SERPINC1 mutations and one of them died of intestinal necrosis. No recurrence was found during follow-up (1-36 months).ConclusionsThe WES technique offers a promising way to screen for thrombophilia in patients with non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT. Patients with SERPINC1 mutations are more inclined to develop intestinal necrosis than others. PMT combined with TIPS provides a safe and effective therapeutic alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"631-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144048316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sapheno-Femoral Junction Aneurysm: Single Centre Experience With Technical Notes and Histological Analysis. 隐静脉-股交界处动脉瘤:单中心经验,技术说明和组织学分析。
Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251334794
Matteo Bucalossi, Alberto Caggiati, Simone Carotti, Lorenzo Nevi, Fabrizio Mariani, Daniele Bissacco, Stefano Mancini

ObjectiveAn aneurysm is a localized dilation of a blood vessel, commonly referring to the arterial system, but venous aneurysms, especially in the lower limbs, are significant and often underreported vascular conditions. This study focuses on superficial venous aneurysms at the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ), categorized as Type IA and IB.Materials and MethodsEleven patients (5 females, 6 males; mean age 50 years) with venous masses were identified after negative hernia evaluations. Diagnosis was established through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound, confirming SFJ dilation with specific inclusion criteria. Surgical excision was performed, followed by follow-up assessments up to 5 years.ResultsAll patients underwent successful surgical excision. No major complications occurred, and all patients ambulated immediately post-surgery. Five years post-operation, there were no inguinal recurrences, and residual great saphenous vein remained patent and continent. Histopathological analysis revealed wall thinning, reduced smooth muscle and elastic fibers, and fibrous connective tissue predominance.ConclusionSuperficial venous aneurysms at the SFJ are rare but can be effectively managed through surgical excision. With appropriate diagnosis and intervention, the risk of complications is minimal, supporting the need for awareness and accurate classification in clinical practice.

动脉瘤是血管的局部扩张,通常指的是动脉系统,但静脉动脉瘤,尤其是下肢的静脉动脉瘤,是一种重要的血管疾病,经常被低估。本研究主要研究位于隐股交界处的浅静脉动脉瘤(SFJ),分为IA型和ib型。材料与方法6例患者(女性5例,男性6例;平均年龄50岁)在疝评估阴性后发现静脉肿块。通过临床检查和双工超声确定诊断,确认SFJ扩张符合特定的纳入标准。手术切除,随后随访评估长达5年。结果所有患者均手术切除成功。无重大并发症发生,所有患者术后均可立即走动。术后5年无腹股沟复发,残余大隐静脉通畅。组织病理学分析显示壁变薄,平滑肌和弹性纤维减少,纤维结缔组织占优势。结论SFJ浅表性静脉动脉瘤虽少见,但手术切除可有效治疗。通过适当的诊断和干预,并发症的风险最小,支持在临床实践中认识和准确分类的需要。
{"title":"Sapheno-Femoral Junction Aneurysm: Single Centre Experience With Technical Notes and Histological Analysis.","authors":"Matteo Bucalossi, Alberto Caggiati, Simone Carotti, Lorenzo Nevi, Fabrizio Mariani, Daniele Bissacco, Stefano Mancini","doi":"10.1177/15385744251334794","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251334794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAn aneurysm is a localized dilation of a blood vessel, commonly referring to the arterial system, but venous aneurysms, especially in the lower limbs, are significant and often underreported vascular conditions. This study focuses on superficial venous aneurysms at the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ), categorized as Type IA and IB.Materials and MethodsEleven patients (5 females, 6 males; mean age 50 years) with venous masses were identified after negative hernia evaluations. Diagnosis was established through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound, confirming SFJ dilation with specific inclusion criteria. Surgical excision was performed, followed by follow-up assessments up to 5 years.ResultsAll patients underwent successful surgical excision. No major complications occurred, and all patients ambulated immediately post-surgery. Five years post-operation, there were no inguinal recurrences, and residual great saphenous vein remained patent and continent. Histopathological analysis revealed wall thinning, reduced smooth muscle and elastic fibers, and fibrous connective tissue predominance.ConclusionSuperficial venous aneurysms at the SFJ are rare but can be effectively managed through surgical excision. With appropriate diagnosis and intervention, the risk of complications is minimal, supporting the need for awareness and accurate classification in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"623-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144004515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence of Perioperative Outcomes After Carotid Revascularization With Special Emphasis on Myocardial Infarction - A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. 颈动脉血运重建术后围手术期结果的发生率,特别是心肌梗死--随机对照试验的系统回顾和 Meta 分析。
IF 0.7 Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251330930
Panagiota Valaki, Konstantinos G Moulakakis, Spyridon Mylonas, Christos Karathanos, Konstantinos Batzalexis, Athanasios Giannoukas

Background and AimThe aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of periprocedural outcomes after carotid revascularization with special emphasis on myocardial infarction and assess the safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA multiple electronic search was performed in Medline (database provider PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE (database provider Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles from 2000 up to 2023 reporting outcomes after carotid revascularization. Randomized control trials comparing the perioperative events (30-day results) after CAS and CEA stating the perioperative risk of myocardial infarction were included in the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of twelve randomized control trials (RCTs) with 11 153 patients were identified and considered eligible. The pooled risk of periprocedural stroke was found to be reduced after CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, P < 0.05], while PMI was found to be more frequent after CEA, favoring CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, P < 0.05]. Periprocedural mortality was lower but not reaching statistical significance in the CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, P = 0.68]. The pooled OR for composite endpoint of stroke, MI or death was in favor of CEA as safer treatment [OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, P < 0.05].ConclusionsPMI risk was lower after CAS, although the currently available data do not demonstrate any increase in mortality rates.

背景与目的本研究旨在通过系统回顾和meta分析,评估颈动脉重建术(尤其是心肌梗死)后围手术期结局的发生率,并评估颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的安全性。方法在Medline(数据库提供商PubMed)、Web of Science Core Collection、EMBASE(数据库提供商Ovid)和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库中检索2000年至2023年报道颈动脉血运重建术结果的文章。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,本荟萃分析纳入了比较CAS和CEA围手术期事件(30天结果)表明心肌梗死围手术期风险的随机对照试验。结果共纳入12项随机对照试验(rct),纳入11 153例患者。与CAS相比,CEA后围手术期卒中的总风险降低[OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, P < 0.05],而CEA后PMI更频繁,有利于CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, P < 0.05]。与CAS相比,CEA的围手术期死亡率较低,但未达到统计学意义[OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, P = 0.68]。卒中、心肌梗死或死亡复合终点的合并OR支持CEA作为更安全的治疗方法[OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, P < 0.05]。结论CAS后spmi风险较低,但目前可获得的数据未显示死亡率有任何增加。
{"title":"Incidence of Perioperative Outcomes After Carotid Revascularization With Special Emphasis on Myocardial Infarction - A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.","authors":"Panagiota Valaki, Konstantinos G Moulakakis, Spyridon Mylonas, Christos Karathanos, Konstantinos Batzalexis, Athanasios Giannoukas","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330930","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251330930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and AimThe aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of periprocedural outcomes after carotid revascularization with special emphasis on myocardial infarction and assess the safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA multiple electronic search was performed in Medline (database provider PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE (database provider Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles from 2000 up to 2023 reporting outcomes after carotid revascularization. Randomized control trials comparing the perioperative events (30-day results) after CAS and CEA stating the perioperative risk of myocardial infarction were included in the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of twelve randomized control trials (RCTs) with 11 153 patients were identified and considered eligible. The pooled risk of periprocedural stroke was found to be reduced after CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, <i>P</i> < 0.05], while PMI was found to be more frequent after CEA, favoring CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, <i>P</i> < 0.05]. Periprocedural mortality was lower but not reaching statistical significance in the CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, <i>P</i> = 0.68]. The pooled OR for composite endpoint of stroke, MI or death was in favor of CEA as safer treatment [OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, <i>P</i> < 0.05].ConclusionsPMI risk was lower after CAS, although the currently available data do not demonstrate any increase in mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"641-653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143744610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Intra-abdominal Cancer Stage on Outcomes after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. 腹内肿瘤分期对腹主动脉瘤修复后预后的影响。
Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251330679
Andrea L Lubitz, Lynde K Lutzow, Jessica Beard, Frank Schmieder, Xiaoning Lu, Huaqing Zhao, Lawrence Oresanya

ObjectiveA significant number of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have a prior diagnosis of cancer. Further information on outcomes following AAA repair in patients with recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis could help guide decision making.MethodsWe used the 2005-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to examine outcomes of AAA repair in patients with a recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis. Patients who had undergone AAA repair within 2 years following a cancer diagnosis were included in the study and stratified by cancer stage. We used Kaplan-Meir curves and survival models to compare outcomes of AAA repair in patients with cancer to a cohort without cancer.ResultsWe identified 2614 patients with intra-abdominal malignancy and 2680 patients without cancer who had AAA repairs. Cancer stages were: 53% stage I, 31% stage II, 11% stage III and 5% stage IV. Cancer patients were less likely to undergo open repair (20% vs 28% P < 0.001) or emergent repairs (15% vs 24% P < 0.001). Survival 2 years after AAA repair was 81% for patients without cancer and 78% for the cancer cohort. 2-year mortality by cancer stage was 20% for stage I, 20% for stage II, 33% for stage III and 69% for stage IV cancer patients (AHR for 2-year mortality, Stage I 1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.27), Stage II 1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.50), Stage III 2.01 (95% CI 1.62-2.50), Stage IV 5.23 (95% CI 4.17-6.56)).ConclusionPatients with late-stage intra-abdominal malignancies had significantly poorer prognosis following repair of a synchronous AAA as compared to patients without cancer. This data could help inform decision making around the role of AAA repair in the setting of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy.

目的:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术的患者中,有相当多的患者之前被诊断为癌症。进一步了解腹内恶性肿瘤患者行AAA修复后的预后,有助于指导决策。方法:我们使用2005-2016年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-Medicare数据库来检查近期腹部恶性肿瘤诊断患者的AAA修复结果。在癌症诊断后2年内接受AAA级修复的患者被纳入研究,并按癌症分期分层。我们使用Kaplan-Meir曲线和生存模型来比较癌症患者和非癌症患者的AAA修复结果。结果我们确定了2614例腹内恶性肿瘤患者和2680例无癌患者进行了AAA修复。癌症分期为:53%为I期,31%为II期,11%为III期,5%为IV期。癌症患者较少接受开放式修复(20%对28% P < 0.001)或紧急修复(15%对24% P < 0.001)。无癌症患者在AAA修复后2年生存率为81%,癌症患者为78%。癌症分期的2年死亡率I期为20%,II期为20%,III期为33%,IV期为69%(2年死亡率AHR, I期1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.27), II期1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.50), III期2.01 (95% CI 1.62-2.50), IV期5.23 (95% CI 4.17-6.56))。结论晚期腹内恶性肿瘤患者同步AAA修复后的预后明显差于无癌患者。这些数据可以帮助决定在腹内合并恶性肿瘤的情况下,AAA修复的作用。
{"title":"The Impact of Intra-abdominal Cancer Stage on Outcomes after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Andrea L Lubitz, Lynde K Lutzow, Jessica Beard, Frank Schmieder, Xiaoning Lu, Huaqing Zhao, Lawrence Oresanya","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330679","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251330679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveA significant number of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have a prior diagnosis of cancer. Further information on outcomes following AAA repair in patients with recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis could help guide decision making.MethodsWe used the 2005-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to examine outcomes of AAA repair in patients with a recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis. Patients who had undergone AAA repair within 2 years following a cancer diagnosis were included in the study and stratified by cancer stage. We used Kaplan-Meir curves and survival models to compare outcomes of AAA repair in patients with cancer to a cohort without cancer.ResultsWe identified 2614 patients with intra-abdominal malignancy and 2680 patients without cancer who had AAA repairs. Cancer stages were: 53% stage I, 31% stage II, 11% stage III and 5% stage IV. Cancer patients were less likely to undergo open repair (20% vs 28% <i>P</i> < 0.001) or emergent repairs (15% vs 24% <i>P</i> < 0.001). Survival 2 years after AAA repair was 81% for patients without cancer and 78% for the cancer cohort. 2-year mortality by cancer stage was 20% for stage I, 20% for stage II, 33% for stage III and 69% for stage IV cancer patients (AHR for 2-year mortality, Stage I 1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.27), Stage II 1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.50), Stage III 2.01 (95% CI 1.62-2.50), Stage IV 5.23 (95% CI 4.17-6.56)).ConclusionPatients with late-stage intra-abdominal malignancies had significantly poorer prognosis following repair of a synchronous AAA as compared to patients without cancer. This data could help inform decision making around the role of AAA repair in the setting of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"610-616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143744612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single Versus Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment With a Stent for an Iliac Occlusive Lesion. 髂闭塞病变接受血管内支架治疗患者的单抗与双抗血小板治疗。
Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.1177/15385744251330934
Taira Kobayashi, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Masaki Hamamoto, Shinya Takahashi

ObjectiveEndovascular treatment (EVT) for an aorto-iliac occlusive lesion is performed worldwide as first-line treatment. However, the choice of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after aorto-iliac revascularization is controversial. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with SAPT or DAPT after iliac EVT, using propensity score matching.MethodPatients who underwent EVT for a de-novo iliac occlusive lesion at a single center from 2017 to 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between SAPT and DAPT cases after propensity score matching. The primary endpoints of the study were freedom from restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).ResultsA total of 150 patients underwent iliac EVT and received SAPT (n = 93) or DAPT (n = 57). The DAPT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary artery disease (P = .010). After matching, the differences in baseline and procedural details were diminished. The technical success rate of EVT, access site complications, and manual compression time did not differ between the groups. The median follow-up period was 33 (20-47) months. During follow-up, restenosis occurred in 11 cases (7%) and 10 cases (7%) underwent TLR. After matching, the 5-year freedom from restenosis did not differ significantly in the SAPT and DAPT groups (92% vs 90%, P = .80). Freedom from TLR also did not differ between the groups (P = .80). There was a tendency for a lower incident rate of major bleeding in the SAPT group (7% vs 18% at 5 years, P = .10).ConclusionsRetrospective analysis using propensity score matching showed that SAPT after iliac EVT resulted in similar freedom from restenosis and TLR compared with DAPT.

目的全世界都将髂主动脉闭塞病变的血管内治疗(EVT)作为一线治疗方法。然而,髂主动脉血运重建术后选择单抗血小板疗法(SAPT)还是双抗血小板疗法(DAPT)仍存在争议。该研究的目的是采用倾向评分匹配法评估髂EVT术后接受SAPT或DAPT患者的临床预后。方法回顾性分析了2017年至2023年期间在一个中心接受EVT治疗的髂骨闭塞病变患者。经过倾向得分匹配后,对SAPT和DAPT病例进行比较。研究的主要终点是无再狭窄和无靶病变血运重建(TLR)。结果共有150名患者接受了髂EVT,并接受了SAPT(n = 93)或DAPT(n = 57)。DAPT 组的冠状动脉疾病发生率明显更高(P = .010)。配对后,基线和手术细节的差异减小。EVT的技术成功率、入路部位并发症和手动压迫时间在两组之间没有差异。中位随访时间为 33(20-47)个月。随访期间,11 例(7%)发生了再狭窄,10 例(7%)进行了 TLR。匹配后,SAPT 组和 DAPT 组的 5 年再狭窄发生率无显著差异(92% vs 90%,P = .80)。两组患者的 TLR 发生率也无差异(P = .80)。SAPT组的大出血发生率有降低的趋势(5年时7% vs 18%,P = .10)。结论使用倾向评分匹配法进行的回顾性分析表明,与DAPT相比,髂骨EVT术后SAPT的再狭窄和TLR发生率相似。
{"title":"Single Versus Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment With a Stent for an Iliac Occlusive Lesion.","authors":"Taira Kobayashi, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Masaki Hamamoto, Shinya Takahashi","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330934","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251330934","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveEndovascular treatment (EVT) for an aorto-iliac occlusive lesion is performed worldwide as first-line treatment. However, the choice of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after aorto-iliac revascularization is controversial. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with SAPT or DAPT after iliac EVT, using propensity score matching.MethodPatients who underwent EVT for a de-novo iliac occlusive lesion at a single center from 2017 to 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between SAPT and DAPT cases after propensity score matching. The primary endpoints of the study were freedom from restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).ResultsA total of 150 patients underwent iliac EVT and received SAPT (n = 93) or DAPT (n = 57). The DAPT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary artery disease (<i>P</i> = .010). After matching, the differences in baseline and procedural details were diminished. The technical success rate of EVT, access site complications, and manual compression time did not differ between the groups. The median follow-up period was 33 (20-47) months. During follow-up, restenosis occurred in 11 cases (7%) and 10 cases (7%) underwent TLR. After matching, the 5-year freedom from restenosis did not differ significantly in the SAPT and DAPT groups (92% vs 90%, <i>P</i> = .80). Freedom from TLR also did not differ between the groups (<i>P</i> = .80). There was a tendency for a lower incident rate of major bleeding in the SAPT group (7% vs 18% at 5 years, <i>P</i> = .10).ConclusionsRetrospective analysis using propensity score matching showed that SAPT after iliac EVT resulted in similar freedom from restenosis and TLR compared with DAPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"617-622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143702209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vascular and endovascular surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1