BackgroundEndovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is still challenging. We propose a stent deployment technique for AIOD using only bare-nitinol stents (BNSs) in a form that is ultimately similar to the normal aortoiliac bifurcation structure.Methods and case seriesThe Endovascular Skirt reCOnstruction of aoRToiliac bifurcation using bare-nitinol stents (ESCORT) technique involves primary implantation of a large BNS, with its distal edge being placed just at the edge of the carina by mounting onto 2 pull-through guidewires from the side of an upper extremity followed by V-stenting using BNSs into the pre-implanted BNS at the terminal aorta. The results of experiments showed that this technique can be achieved by the unique structural characteristic of an E-Luminexx Vascular stent (BD, Tempe, AZ, USA) as a main body in which the stent edge can be advanced beyond the catheter tip. This technique without using stent grafts can avoid recrossing of the jailed guidewire and can reduce the procedural and long-term care that is necessary when using stent grafts, and a future cross-over approach may be established also after treatment. Between 2017 and 2021, the ESCORT technique was performed in 7 consecutive cases of AIOD at our institute. The procedural success rate was 100%, and no complication occurred in any of the patients. Symptom resolution was obtained in all patients. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 1 patient with extremely severe calcified lesions. Except for the 1 case requiring TLR, at least 2-year patency was confirmed in patients who were followed up. The establishment of a cross-over system was tried in 2 patients after the procedure, and it was successful in both cases.ConclusionThe ESCORT technique for AIOD is a feasible and beneficial stenting strategy.
{"title":"Endovascular Skirt Reconstruction of Aortoiliac Bifurcation Using Bare-nitinol Stents: ESCORT Technique.","authors":"Takenobu Shimada, Yoshihisa Shimada, Daisuke Tonomura, Kazunori Terashita, Yuki Yamanaka, Daiju Fukuda","doi":"10.1177/15385744251339967","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251339967","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEndovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is still challenging. We propose a stent deployment technique for AIOD using only bare-nitinol stents (BNSs) in a form that is ultimately similar to the normal aortoiliac bifurcation structure.Methods and case seriesThe Endovascular Skirt reCOnstruction of aoRToiliac bifurcation using bare-nitinol stents (ESCORT) technique involves primary implantation of a large BNS, with its distal edge being placed just at the edge of the carina by mounting onto 2 pull-through guidewires from the side of an upper extremity followed by V-stenting using BNSs into the pre-implanted BNS at the terminal aorta. The results of experiments showed that this technique can be achieved by the unique structural characteristic of an E-Luminexx Vascular stent (BD, Tempe, AZ, USA) as a main body in which the stent edge can be advanced beyond the catheter tip. This technique without using stent grafts can avoid recrossing of the jailed guidewire and can reduce the procedural and long-term care that is necessary when using stent grafts, and a future cross-over approach may be established also after treatment. Between 2017 and 2021, the ESCORT technique was performed in 7 consecutive cases of AIOD at our institute. The procedural success rate was 100%, and no complication occurred in any of the patients. Symptom resolution was obtained in all patients. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 1 patient with extremely severe calcified lesions. Except for the 1 case requiring TLR, at least 2-year patency was confirmed in patients who were followed up. The establishment of a cross-over system was tried in 2 patients after the procedure, and it was successful in both cases.ConclusionThe ESCORT technique for AIOD is a feasible and beneficial stenting strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"725-732"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144060858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1177/15385744251355218
Mariana Pinzón-Pinto, Esteban Portilla-Rojas, Angie Ebratt, Juan Miguel Mutis-Toro, Daniela Arévalo-Montaño, Martín Contreras, Leonardo Randial, Luis-Felipe Cabrera-Vargas
Introduction and ObjectiveMay Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a condition characterized by left iliofemoral vein compression, often leading to lower limb symptoms and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular management for symptomatic, non-thrombotic MTS in a Latin American population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study analyzed 43 patients with MTS who underwent endovascular stenting and anticoagulation between 2018 and 2023 in Bogotá, Colombia. Clinical data, including demographics, symptoms, and comorbidities, were collected. Perioperative outcomes, such as procedure time, complications, and length of stay, were recorded. Postoperative follow-up included stent patency, symptom resolution, and the occurrence of complications.ResultsEndovascular management demonstrated high efficacy, with 83.7% of patients achieving symptom resolution and 100% stent patency at 6 months. No major complications were reported. The average procedure time was 52.6 minutes, and patients were discharged within 1 day of the procedure.ConclusionEarly intervention with endovascular embolization is crucial for patients with MTS and symptomatic pelvic varices. This approach offers a safe and effective solution for managing the condition and preventing complications. The presence of symptoms should be considered an indication for endovascular intervention, rather than waiting for thrombosis development.
{"title":"Outcomes in Endovascular Management of May Thurner Syndrome Without Access to IVUS in a Latin American Cohort: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mariana Pinzón-Pinto, Esteban Portilla-Rojas, Angie Ebratt, Juan Miguel Mutis-Toro, Daniela Arévalo-Montaño, Martín Contreras, Leonardo Randial, Luis-Felipe Cabrera-Vargas","doi":"10.1177/15385744251355218","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251355218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction and ObjectiveMay Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a condition characterized by left iliofemoral vein compression, often leading to lower limb symptoms and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular management for symptomatic, non-thrombotic MTS in a Latin American population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study analyzed 43 patients with MTS who underwent endovascular stenting and anticoagulation between 2018 and 2023 in Bogotá, Colombia. Clinical data, including demographics, symptoms, and comorbidities, were collected. Perioperative outcomes, such as procedure time, complications, and length of stay, were recorded. Postoperative follow-up included stent patency, symptom resolution, and the occurrence of complications.ResultsEndovascular management demonstrated high efficacy, with 83.7% of patients achieving symptom resolution and 100% stent patency at 6 months. No major complications were reported. The average procedure time was 52.6 minutes, and patients were discharged within 1 day of the procedure.ConclusionEarly intervention with endovascular embolization is crucial for patients with MTS and symptomatic pelvic varices. This approach offers a safe and effective solution for managing the condition and preventing complications. The presence of symptoms should be considered an indication for endovascular intervention, rather than waiting for thrombosis development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"690-694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144510208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1177/15385744251375263
Megan Power Foley, Daniel Westby, Oisín Brennan, Emily Boyle, Stewart R Walsh
IntroductionPost-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant concern after endovenous ablation (EVA) for varicose veins. Risk stratification tools aid identifying which patients have an increased VTE risk. There is no consensus on which currently utilised score is most appropriate for daycase surgery. The aim of this observational study was to compare how 2 institutions utilised the Caprini and Worcester Scores to risk stratify ambulatory EVA patients in real-world practice.MethodsA retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing truncal ablation under local anaesthetic in 2 separate vascular centres between 2022-23 was performed. Each patient was scored prospectively using either the Caprini and Worcester Score for perioperative VTE risk assessment, and then retrospectively using the alternate tool. Demographics and risk factors were documented and compared between patients categorised as "at risk" by each score. Categorical variables were analysed using Chi-Square and continuous using Mann-Whitney U Tests.ResultsTwo hundred patients undergoing endovenous ablation were included. Over half the cohort were female (n = 122, 61%) and the median age was 53.0 years (range 23-87). Twenty-one percent (n = 42) had a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30. Overall, 90 patients were flagged as high-risk by either score. Fifty-three patients (26.5%) were flagged by the Worcester Score as either 'moderate' (n = 42, 21%) or 'high risk' (n = 11, 5.5%). Fifty-eight patients (29%) were identified as 'high risk' by the Caprini tool. A significant discrepancy in which patients were categorised as "at risk" by each score was noted, with only 21 patients stratified as "at risk" by both (P = 0.047).ConclusionsA similar proportion of patients were stratified as high risk by each score, however the lack of overlap between the 2 risk assessment tools suggests a discrepancy in what variables are scored for. Further well-powered studies are needed to validate which score is most appropriate for ambulatory EVA.
{"title":"Comparison of Caprini and Worcester Scores for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in the Setting of Ambulatory Endovenous Surgery.","authors":"Megan Power Foley, Daniel Westby, Oisín Brennan, Emily Boyle, Stewart R Walsh","doi":"10.1177/15385744251375263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251375263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPost-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant concern after endovenous ablation (EVA) for varicose veins. Risk stratification tools aid identifying which patients have an increased VTE risk. There is no consensus on which currently utilised score is most appropriate for daycase surgery. The aim of this observational study was to compare how 2 institutions utilised the Caprini and Worcester Scores to risk stratify ambulatory EVA patients in real-world practice.MethodsA retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing truncal ablation under local anaesthetic in 2 separate vascular centres between 2022-23 was performed. Each patient was scored prospectively using either the Caprini and Worcester Score for perioperative VTE risk assessment, and then retrospectively using the alternate tool. Demographics and risk factors were documented and compared between patients categorised as \"at risk\" by each score. Categorical variables were analysed using Chi-Square and continuous using Mann-Whitney U Tests.ResultsTwo hundred patients undergoing endovenous ablation were included. Over half the cohort were female (n = 122, 61%) and the median age was 53.0 years (range 23-87). Twenty-one percent (n = 42) had a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30. Overall, 90 patients were flagged as high-risk by either score. Fifty-three patients (26.5%) were flagged by the Worcester Score as either 'moderate' (n = 42, 21%) or 'high risk' (n = 11, 5.5%). Fifty-eight patients (29%) were identified as 'high risk' by the Caprini tool. A significant discrepancy in which patients were categorised as \"at risk\" by each score was noted, with only 21 patients stratified as \"at risk\" by both (<i>P</i> = 0.047).ConclusionsA similar proportion of patients were stratified as high risk by each score, however the lack of overlap between the 2 risk assessment tools suggests a discrepancy in what variables are scored for. Further well-powered studies are needed to validate which score is most appropriate for ambulatory EVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251375263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-02DOI: 10.1177/15385744251367540
Kausik Chatterjee, Jack Hood, Abhijit Das, Ragai R Makar, Bhavana Selvarajah, Andrew Irwin Khallaf, Kumar Pulupula, Parthasarathy Karunakarana, Joanna Heyworth, Georgia Farrag, Allam Harfoush, Alakendu Sekhar
BackgroundAlthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is effective for moderate to severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, it carries a risk of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (POCVA). Currently, there is insufficient evidence on the relationship between cranial vascular integrity and intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, we utilised data collected from patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid artery disease between December 2005 and October 2019 in the South Mersey Arterial Centre, UK. Patients with three-dimensional CT angiogram data and evidence of postoperative stroke were considered as cases and matched with those without such evidence considered as controls. 3D-CTA data were analysed following a structured pro-forma and data regarding haemodynamic changes were obtained from operative notes. Variables that showed statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 21 cases and 55 matched controls were identified. Presence of atherosclerotic disease in the vertebral arteries on either side, intracranial atherosclerosis and a drop in the systolic blood pressure were significantly different between cases and controls. Our multivariate logistic regression models indicated that the likelihood of stroke was higher with vertebral artery (V1-V4) stenosis on either side (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-24.6) and an intraoperative systolic blood pressure drop greater than 44 mmHg (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-27.6).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of evaluating posterior circulation abnormalities in POCVA. Moreover, careful intraoperative blood pressure management is crucial in perioperative care. This may aid in developing personalised risk stratification and enhancing intraoperative monitoring during CEA.
背景:尽管颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)对中度至重度症状性颈动脉狭窄是有效的,但它存在术后脑血管意外(POCVA)的风险。目前,颅血管完整性与术中血流动力学波动之间的关系尚缺乏证据。方法在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们利用了2005年12月至2019年10月在英国南默西动脉中心接受CEA治疗的症状性颈动脉疾病患者的数据。有三维CT血管造影资料和术后卒中证据的患者作为病例,与没有这些证据的患者作为对照。3D-CTA数据根据结构化的形式进行分析,并从手术记录中获得有关血流动力学变化的数据。单因素分析中有统计学意义的变量纳入多因素logistic回归分析。结果共鉴定出21例病例和55例对照。两侧椎动脉存在动脉粥样硬化疾病、颅内动脉粥样硬化和收缩压下降在病例和对照组之间有显著差异。我们的多因素logistic回归模型显示,卒中的可能性较高的椎动脉(V1-V4)狭窄的任何一侧(OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-24.6)和术中收缩压下降大于44 mmHg (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-27.6)。结论这些发现强调了评估POCVA后循环异常的重要性。此外,仔细的术中血压管理是围手术期护理的关键。这可能有助于发展个性化的风险分层和加强术中监测CEA。
{"title":"POSToperative CerebrovascUlar Accident Following Symptomatic Carotid EndarterectoMy (OSTIUM): A Retrospective Case-Control Study.","authors":"Kausik Chatterjee, Jack Hood, Abhijit Das, Ragai R Makar, Bhavana Selvarajah, Andrew Irwin Khallaf, Kumar Pulupula, Parthasarathy Karunakarana, Joanna Heyworth, Georgia Farrag, Allam Harfoush, Alakendu Sekhar","doi":"10.1177/15385744251367540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251367540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is effective for moderate to severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, it carries a risk of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (POCVA). Currently, there is insufficient evidence on the relationship between cranial vascular integrity and intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, we utilised data collected from patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid artery disease between December 2005 and October 2019 in the South Mersey Arterial Centre, UK. Patients with three-dimensional CT angiogram data and evidence of postoperative stroke were considered as cases and matched with those without such evidence considered as controls. 3D-CTA data were analysed following a structured pro-forma and data regarding haemodynamic changes were obtained from operative notes. Variables that showed statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 21 cases and 55 matched controls were identified. Presence of atherosclerotic disease in the vertebral arteries on either side, intracranial atherosclerosis and a drop in the systolic blood pressure were significantly different between cases and controls. Our multivariate logistic regression models indicated that the likelihood of stroke was higher with vertebral artery (V1-V4) stenosis on either side (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-24.6) and an intraoperative systolic blood pressure drop greater than 44 mmHg (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-27.6).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of evaluating posterior circulation abnormalities in POCVA. Moreover, careful intraoperative blood pressure management is crucial in perioperative care. This may aid in developing personalised risk stratification and enhancing intraoperative monitoring during CEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251367540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144769516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-04-25DOI: 10.1177/15385744251326310
Sergio Asensio, Jose Antonio Brizuela, Alvaro Revilla, Sergio Fernández-Bello, James Henry Taylor, Enrique Maria San Norberto
Objective: This case report aims to present a new endovascular technique for arterial embolization using a relatively recently developed endovascular device, Shape Memory Polymer (SMP) Embolization Plug (IMPEDE, Shape Memory Medical). Methods: A 66-year-old man presented an asymptomatic common iliac aneurysm with a maximun diameter of 4.4 cm and a previous aorto-bifemoral bypass. Results: An embolization of the common iliac artery aneurysm with 5 units of IMPEDE-FX Rapid Fill (12 mm, Shape Memory Medical) and revascularization from external iliac artery to internal iliac artery through a banana technique with an auto-expandable covered stent (Viabahn 10 × 100 mm, Gore) was performed. Conclusion: The experience obtained after the use of this device has allowed us to increase the therapeutic arsenal for high volume aneurysm embolization.
目的:本病例报告旨在介绍一种新的血管内栓塞技术,使用一种相对较新开发的血管内装置,形状记忆聚合物(SMP)栓塞塞(阻碍,形状记忆医学)。方法:66岁男性,无症状髂总动脉瘤,最大直径4.4 cm,既往行主动脉-双侧旁路手术。结果:采用5个单位的IMPEDE-FX快速填充(12 mm, Shape Memory Medical)栓塞髂总动脉瘤,并通过香蕉技术采用自动可扩张覆盖支架(Viabahn 10 × 100 mm, Gore)从髂外动脉到髂内动脉进行血运重建术。结论:使用该装置后获得的经验使我们增加了大容量动脉瘤栓塞的治疗武器库。
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of Common Iliac Aneurysm After Aortobifemoral Bypass: Banana Technique and Shape Memory Polymer Plug Embolization.","authors":"Sergio Asensio, Jose Antonio Brizuela, Alvaro Revilla, Sergio Fernández-Bello, James Henry Taylor, Enrique Maria San Norberto","doi":"10.1177/15385744251326310","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251326310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This case report aims to present a new endovascular technique for arterial embolization using a relatively recently developed endovascular device, Shape Memory Polymer (SMP) Embolization Plug (IMPEDE, Shape Memory Medical). <b>Methods:</b> A 66-year-old man presented an asymptomatic common iliac aneurysm with a maximun diameter of 4.4 cm and a previous aorto-bifemoral bypass. <b>Results:</b> An embolization of the common iliac artery aneurysm with 5 units of IMPEDE-FX Rapid Fill (12 mm, Shape Memory Medical) and revascularization from external iliac artery to internal iliac artery through a banana technique with an auto-expandable covered stent (Viabahn 10 × 100 mm, Gore) was performed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The experience obtained after the use of this device has allowed us to increase the therapeutic arsenal for high volume aneurysm embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"667-670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144035578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the potential role of the whole-exome sequencing (WES) technique in screening pathogenic genes of non-cirrhotic and non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the clinical efficacy of AngioJet-assisted pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) to treat this disease.Methods16 patients with acute non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT were retrospectively analyzed. 14 patients received genetically diagnosed using the WES technique, ten patients received PMT with or without TIPS and 6 cases received anticoagulation alone. Changes in clinical symptoms, and recanalization of the portal vein (PV) were also recorded.Results4 patients (28.6%) had JAK2 V617 F mutation, 4 patients (28.6%) had PROC mutations, 3 patients (21.4%) had SERPINC1mutations. Among patients treated with anticoagulation alone, 5 patients (83.3%, 5/6) developed cavernous transformation of PV and one patient with JAK2 V617 F mutation achieved complete recanalization of PV. One patient treated with PMT without TIPS developed PV cavernous transformation, eight patients (80%) treated with PMT and TIPS achieved complete or partial recanalization of PV. Three patients who developed intestinal necrosis all had SERPINC1 mutations and one of them died of intestinal necrosis. No recurrence was found during follow-up (1-36 months).ConclusionsThe WES technique offers a promising way to screen for thrombophilia in patients with non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT. Patients with SERPINC1 mutations are more inclined to develop intestinal necrosis than others. PMT combined with TIPS provides a safe and effective therapeutic alternative.
{"title":"Genetic Diagnosis and Combinational Treatment With Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Non-cirrhotic and Non-malignant Portal Vein Thrombosis.","authors":"Feng Chen, Qing Gen Xiong, Fei Lu, Zhi Jian Luo, Wei Luo, Wei Zhou","doi":"10.1177/15385744251334793","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251334793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the potential role of the whole-exome sequencing (WES) technique in screening pathogenic genes of non-cirrhotic and non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the clinical efficacy of AngioJet-assisted pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) to treat this disease.Methods16 patients with acute non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT were retrospectively analyzed. 14 patients received genetically diagnosed using the WES technique, ten patients received PMT with or without TIPS and 6 cases received anticoagulation alone. Changes in clinical symptoms, and recanalization of the portal vein (PV) were also recorded.Results4 patients (28.6%) had JAK2 V617 F mutation, 4 patients (28.6%) had PROC mutations, 3 patients (21.4%) had SERPINC1mutations. Among patients treated with anticoagulation alone, 5 patients (83.3%, 5/6) developed cavernous transformation of PV and one patient with JAK2 V617 F mutation achieved complete recanalization of PV. One patient treated with PMT without TIPS developed PV cavernous transformation, eight patients (80%) treated with PMT and TIPS achieved complete or partial recanalization of PV. Three patients who developed intestinal necrosis all had SERPINC1 mutations and one of them died of intestinal necrosis. No recurrence was found during follow-up (1-36 months).ConclusionsThe WES technique offers a promising way to screen for thrombophilia in patients with non-cirrhotic and non-malignant PVT. Patients with SERPINC1 mutations are more inclined to develop intestinal necrosis than others. PMT combined with TIPS provides a safe and effective therapeutic alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"631-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144048316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-04-14DOI: 10.1177/15385744251334794
Matteo Bucalossi, Alberto Caggiati, Simone Carotti, Lorenzo Nevi, Fabrizio Mariani, Daniele Bissacco, Stefano Mancini
ObjectiveAn aneurysm is a localized dilation of a blood vessel, commonly referring to the arterial system, but venous aneurysms, especially in the lower limbs, are significant and often underreported vascular conditions. This study focuses on superficial venous aneurysms at the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ), categorized as Type IA and IB.Materials and MethodsEleven patients (5 females, 6 males; mean age 50 years) with venous masses were identified after negative hernia evaluations. Diagnosis was established through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound, confirming SFJ dilation with specific inclusion criteria. Surgical excision was performed, followed by follow-up assessments up to 5 years.ResultsAll patients underwent successful surgical excision. No major complications occurred, and all patients ambulated immediately post-surgery. Five years post-operation, there were no inguinal recurrences, and residual great saphenous vein remained patent and continent. Histopathological analysis revealed wall thinning, reduced smooth muscle and elastic fibers, and fibrous connective tissue predominance.ConclusionSuperficial venous aneurysms at the SFJ are rare but can be effectively managed through surgical excision. With appropriate diagnosis and intervention, the risk of complications is minimal, supporting the need for awareness and accurate classification in clinical practice.
{"title":"Sapheno-Femoral Junction Aneurysm: Single Centre Experience With Technical Notes and Histological Analysis.","authors":"Matteo Bucalossi, Alberto Caggiati, Simone Carotti, Lorenzo Nevi, Fabrizio Mariani, Daniele Bissacco, Stefano Mancini","doi":"10.1177/15385744251334794","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251334794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAn aneurysm is a localized dilation of a blood vessel, commonly referring to the arterial system, but venous aneurysms, especially in the lower limbs, are significant and often underreported vascular conditions. This study focuses on superficial venous aneurysms at the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ), categorized as Type IA and IB.Materials and MethodsEleven patients (5 females, 6 males; mean age 50 years) with venous masses were identified after negative hernia evaluations. Diagnosis was established through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound, confirming SFJ dilation with specific inclusion criteria. Surgical excision was performed, followed by follow-up assessments up to 5 years.ResultsAll patients underwent successful surgical excision. No major complications occurred, and all patients ambulated immediately post-surgery. Five years post-operation, there were no inguinal recurrences, and residual great saphenous vein remained patent and continent. Histopathological analysis revealed wall thinning, reduced smooth muscle and elastic fibers, and fibrous connective tissue predominance.ConclusionSuperficial venous aneurysms at the SFJ are rare but can be effectively managed through surgical excision. With appropriate diagnosis and intervention, the risk of complications is minimal, supporting the need for awareness and accurate classification in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"623-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144004515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and AimThe aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of periprocedural outcomes after carotid revascularization with special emphasis on myocardial infarction and assess the safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA multiple electronic search was performed in Medline (database provider PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE (database provider Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles from 2000 up to 2023 reporting outcomes after carotid revascularization. Randomized control trials comparing the perioperative events (30-day results) after CAS and CEA stating the perioperative risk of myocardial infarction were included in the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of twelve randomized control trials (RCTs) with 11 153 patients were identified and considered eligible. The pooled risk of periprocedural stroke was found to be reduced after CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, P < 0.05], while PMI was found to be more frequent after CEA, favoring CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, P < 0.05]. Periprocedural mortality was lower but not reaching statistical significance in the CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, P = 0.68]. The pooled OR for composite endpoint of stroke, MI or death was in favor of CEA as safer treatment [OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, P < 0.05].ConclusionsPMI risk was lower after CAS, although the currently available data do not demonstrate any increase in mortality rates.
背景与目的本研究旨在通过系统回顾和meta分析,评估颈动脉重建术(尤其是心肌梗死)后围手术期结局的发生率,并评估颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的安全性。方法在Medline(数据库提供商PubMed)、Web of Science Core Collection、EMBASE(数据库提供商Ovid)和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库中检索2000年至2023年报道颈动脉血运重建术结果的文章。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,本荟萃分析纳入了比较CAS和CEA围手术期事件(30天结果)表明心肌梗死围手术期风险的随机对照试验。结果共纳入12项随机对照试验(rct),纳入11 153例患者。与CAS相比,CEA后围手术期卒中的总风险降低[OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, P < 0.05],而CEA后PMI更频繁,有利于CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, P < 0.05]。与CAS相比,CEA的围手术期死亡率较低,但未达到统计学意义[OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, P = 0.68]。卒中、心肌梗死或死亡复合终点的合并OR支持CEA作为更安全的治疗方法[OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, P < 0.05]。结论CAS后spmi风险较低,但目前可获得的数据未显示死亡率有任何增加。
{"title":"Incidence of Perioperative Outcomes After Carotid Revascularization With Special Emphasis on Myocardial Infarction - A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.","authors":"Panagiota Valaki, Konstantinos G Moulakakis, Spyridon Mylonas, Christos Karathanos, Konstantinos Batzalexis, Athanasios Giannoukas","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330930","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251330930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and AimThe aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of periprocedural outcomes after carotid revascularization with special emphasis on myocardial infarction and assess the safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA multiple electronic search was performed in Medline (database provider PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE (database provider Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles from 2000 up to 2023 reporting outcomes after carotid revascularization. Randomized control trials comparing the perioperative events (30-day results) after CAS and CEA stating the perioperative risk of myocardial infarction were included in the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of twelve randomized control trials (RCTs) with 11 153 patients were identified and considered eligible. The pooled risk of periprocedural stroke was found to be reduced after CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, <i>P</i> < 0.05], while PMI was found to be more frequent after CEA, favoring CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, <i>P</i> < 0.05]. Periprocedural mortality was lower but not reaching statistical significance in the CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, <i>P</i> = 0.68]. The pooled OR for composite endpoint of stroke, MI or death was in favor of CEA as safer treatment [OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, <i>P</i> < 0.05].ConclusionsPMI risk was lower after CAS, although the currently available data do not demonstrate any increase in mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"641-653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143744610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-03-28DOI: 10.1177/15385744251330679
Andrea L Lubitz, Lynde K Lutzow, Jessica Beard, Frank Schmieder, Xiaoning Lu, Huaqing Zhao, Lawrence Oresanya
ObjectiveA significant number of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have a prior diagnosis of cancer. Further information on outcomes following AAA repair in patients with recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis could help guide decision making.MethodsWe used the 2005-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to examine outcomes of AAA repair in patients with a recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis. Patients who had undergone AAA repair within 2 years following a cancer diagnosis were included in the study and stratified by cancer stage. We used Kaplan-Meir curves and survival models to compare outcomes of AAA repair in patients with cancer to a cohort without cancer.ResultsWe identified 2614 patients with intra-abdominal malignancy and 2680 patients without cancer who had AAA repairs. Cancer stages were: 53% stage I, 31% stage II, 11% stage III and 5% stage IV. Cancer patients were less likely to undergo open repair (20% vs 28% P < 0.001) or emergent repairs (15% vs 24% P < 0.001). Survival 2 years after AAA repair was 81% for patients without cancer and 78% for the cancer cohort. 2-year mortality by cancer stage was 20% for stage I, 20% for stage II, 33% for stage III and 69% for stage IV cancer patients (AHR for 2-year mortality, Stage I 1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.27), Stage II 1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.50), Stage III 2.01 (95% CI 1.62-2.50), Stage IV 5.23 (95% CI 4.17-6.56)).ConclusionPatients with late-stage intra-abdominal malignancies had significantly poorer prognosis following repair of a synchronous AAA as compared to patients without cancer. This data could help inform decision making around the role of AAA repair in the setting of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy.
目的:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术的患者中,有相当多的患者之前被诊断为癌症。进一步了解腹内恶性肿瘤患者行AAA修复后的预后,有助于指导决策。方法:我们使用2005-2016年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-Medicare数据库来检查近期腹部恶性肿瘤诊断患者的AAA修复结果。在癌症诊断后2年内接受AAA级修复的患者被纳入研究,并按癌症分期分层。我们使用Kaplan-Meir曲线和生存模型来比较癌症患者和非癌症患者的AAA修复结果。结果我们确定了2614例腹内恶性肿瘤患者和2680例无癌患者进行了AAA修复。癌症分期为:53%为I期,31%为II期,11%为III期,5%为IV期。癌症患者较少接受开放式修复(20%对28% P < 0.001)或紧急修复(15%对24% P < 0.001)。无癌症患者在AAA修复后2年生存率为81%,癌症患者为78%。癌症分期的2年死亡率I期为20%,II期为20%,III期为33%,IV期为69%(2年死亡率AHR, I期1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.27), II期1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.50), III期2.01 (95% CI 1.62-2.50), IV期5.23 (95% CI 4.17-6.56))。结论晚期腹内恶性肿瘤患者同步AAA修复后的预后明显差于无癌患者。这些数据可以帮助决定在腹内合并恶性肿瘤的情况下,AAA修复的作用。
{"title":"The Impact of Intra-abdominal Cancer Stage on Outcomes after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Andrea L Lubitz, Lynde K Lutzow, Jessica Beard, Frank Schmieder, Xiaoning Lu, Huaqing Zhao, Lawrence Oresanya","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330679","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251330679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveA significant number of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have a prior diagnosis of cancer. Further information on outcomes following AAA repair in patients with recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis could help guide decision making.MethodsWe used the 2005-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to examine outcomes of AAA repair in patients with a recent intra-abdominal malignancy diagnosis. Patients who had undergone AAA repair within 2 years following a cancer diagnosis were included in the study and stratified by cancer stage. We used Kaplan-Meir curves and survival models to compare outcomes of AAA repair in patients with cancer to a cohort without cancer.ResultsWe identified 2614 patients with intra-abdominal malignancy and 2680 patients without cancer who had AAA repairs. Cancer stages were: 53% stage I, 31% stage II, 11% stage III and 5% stage IV. Cancer patients were less likely to undergo open repair (20% vs 28% <i>P</i> < 0.001) or emergent repairs (15% vs 24% <i>P</i> < 0.001). Survival 2 years after AAA repair was 81% for patients without cancer and 78% for the cancer cohort. 2-year mortality by cancer stage was 20% for stage I, 20% for stage II, 33% for stage III and 69% for stage IV cancer patients (AHR for 2-year mortality, Stage I 1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.27), Stage II 1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.50), Stage III 2.01 (95% CI 1.62-2.50), Stage IV 5.23 (95% CI 4.17-6.56)).ConclusionPatients with late-stage intra-abdominal malignancies had significantly poorer prognosis following repair of a synchronous AAA as compared to patients without cancer. This data could help inform decision making around the role of AAA repair in the setting of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"610-616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143744612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ObjectiveEndovascular treatment (EVT) for an aorto-iliac occlusive lesion is performed worldwide as first-line treatment. However, the choice of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after aorto-iliac revascularization is controversial. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with SAPT or DAPT after iliac EVT, using propensity score matching.MethodPatients who underwent EVT for a de-novo iliac occlusive lesion at a single center from 2017 to 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between SAPT and DAPT cases after propensity score matching. The primary endpoints of the study were freedom from restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).ResultsA total of 150 patients underwent iliac EVT and received SAPT (n = 93) or DAPT (n = 57). The DAPT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary artery disease (P = .010). After matching, the differences in baseline and procedural details were diminished. The technical success rate of EVT, access site complications, and manual compression time did not differ between the groups. The median follow-up period was 33 (20-47) months. During follow-up, restenosis occurred in 11 cases (7%) and 10 cases (7%) underwent TLR. After matching, the 5-year freedom from restenosis did not differ significantly in the SAPT and DAPT groups (92% vs 90%, P = .80). Freedom from TLR also did not differ between the groups (P = .80). There was a tendency for a lower incident rate of major bleeding in the SAPT group (7% vs 18% at 5 years, P = .10).ConclusionsRetrospective analysis using propensity score matching showed that SAPT after iliac EVT resulted in similar freedom from restenosis and TLR compared with DAPT.
{"title":"Single Versus Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment With a Stent for an Iliac Occlusive Lesion.","authors":"Taira Kobayashi, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Masaki Hamamoto, Shinya Takahashi","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330934","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744251330934","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveEndovascular treatment (EVT) for an aorto-iliac occlusive lesion is performed worldwide as first-line treatment. However, the choice of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after aorto-iliac revascularization is controversial. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with SAPT or DAPT after iliac EVT, using propensity score matching.MethodPatients who underwent EVT for a de-novo iliac occlusive lesion at a single center from 2017 to 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between SAPT and DAPT cases after propensity score matching. The primary endpoints of the study were freedom from restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).ResultsA total of 150 patients underwent iliac EVT and received SAPT (n = 93) or DAPT (n = 57). The DAPT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary artery disease (<i>P</i> = .010). After matching, the differences in baseline and procedural details were diminished. The technical success rate of EVT, access site complications, and manual compression time did not differ between the groups. The median follow-up period was 33 (20-47) months. During follow-up, restenosis occurred in 11 cases (7%) and 10 cases (7%) underwent TLR. After matching, the 5-year freedom from restenosis did not differ significantly in the SAPT and DAPT groups (92% vs 90%, <i>P</i> = .80). Freedom from TLR also did not differ between the groups (<i>P</i> = .80). There was a tendency for a lower incident rate of major bleeding in the SAPT group (7% vs 18% at 5 years, <i>P</i> = .10).ConclusionsRetrospective analysis using propensity score matching showed that SAPT after iliac EVT resulted in similar freedom from restenosis and TLR compared with DAPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"617-622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143702209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}