首页 > 最新文献

Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review最新文献

英文 中文
Determining the reasons for the failure of British aircraft manufacturers to invest in Australia's industry, 1934–1941 确定英国飞机制造商在澳大利亚工业投资失败的原因,1934-1941
Pub Date : 2022-01-05 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12235
Malcolm Abbott, Jill Bamforth

The aim of the article is to identify the factors that prevented British aircraft manufacturers from investing in Australia in the second half of the 1930s, a period when rearmament was creating demand for aircraft. The article looks at several unsuccessful proposals by British manufacturers to establish factories in Australia to build aircraft in the late 1930s, with additional attention being given to one proposal in particular. There is evidence that the Australian Government favoured the creation of an Australian-owned industry building aircraft under licence to foreign manufacturers, and it was this factor that largely deterred British investors.

这篇文章的目的是找出阻碍英国飞机制造商在20世纪30年代下半叶投资澳大利亚的因素,当时重整军备创造了对飞机的需求。这篇文章着眼于20世纪30年代末英国制造商在澳大利亚建立工厂制造飞机的几个不成功的提议,并特别关注了一个提议。有证据表明,澳大利亚政府赞成建立一个澳大利亚所有的工业,在外国制造商的许可下建造飞机,正是这个因素在很大程度上阻止了英国投资者。
{"title":"Determining the reasons for the failure of British aircraft manufacturers to invest in Australia's industry, 1934–1941","authors":"Malcolm Abbott,&nbsp;Jill Bamforth","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12235","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12235","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of the article is to identify the factors that prevented British aircraft manufacturers from investing in Australia in the second half of the 1930s, a period when rearmament was creating demand for aircraft. The article looks at several unsuccessful proposals by British manufacturers to establish factories in Australia to build aircraft in the late 1930s, with additional attention being given to one proposal in particular. There is evidence that the Australian Government favoured the creation of an Australian-owned industry building aircraft under licence to foreign manufacturers, and it was this factor that largely deterred British investors.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"62 2","pages":"105-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43129864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Revisiting the tariff-growth correlation: The Australasian colonies, 1866–1900 重访关税与增长的关系:澳大拉西亚殖民地,1866-1900
Pub Date : 2021-12-19 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12233
Brian D. Varian

This article tests for the presence of a tariff-growth correlation among the seven tariff-autonomous colonies of late-nineteenth-century Australasia, making use of several colony-specific macroeconomic series that have only recently become available. Introducing tariffs to a convergence model yields no evidence of an association between tariffs and growth among the Australasian colonies. This finding is unaltered when the tariff variable is replaced by a purposefully constructed proxy variable for the tariff on manufactures specifically. Additionally, this article finds little evidence that tariffs induced an intersectoral adjustment into manufacturing.

本文利用最近才可用的几个特定殖民地的宏观经济系列,测试了19世纪晚期澳大利亚七个关税自治殖民地之间关税增长相关性的存在。在趋同模型中引入关税,没有证据表明关税与澳大拉西亚殖民地的增长之间存在关联。当关税变量被专门针对制造业的关税构建的代理变量所取代时,这一发现没有改变。此外,本文发现几乎没有证据表明关税导致了制造业的部门间调整。
{"title":"Revisiting the tariff-growth correlation: The Australasian colonies, 1866–1900","authors":"Brian D. Varian","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12233","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12233","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article tests for the presence of a tariff-growth correlation among the seven tariff-autonomous colonies of late-nineteenth-century Australasia, making use of several colony-specific macroeconomic series that have only recently become available. Introducing tariffs to a convergence model yields no evidence of an association between tariffs and growth among the Australasian colonies. This finding is unaltered when the tariff variable is replaced by a purposefully constructed proxy variable for the tariff on manufactures specifically. Additionally, this article finds little evidence that tariffs induced an intersectoral adjustment into manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"47-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49380996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Export development in New Zealand: Kiwifruit and seafood 1975–1985 新西兰的出口发展:1975-1985年奇异果和海产品
Pub Date : 2021-12-14 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12234
Jim McAloon

This paper discusses export development in New Zealand in the 1970s and 1980s with reference to the long-running literature about the sustainability of natural resource-based growth, export diversification, and the role of state regulation and encouragement. Since 1970 New Zealand's export commodity mix has diversified. Pastoral exports, once dominant, are complemented by seafood, wine, fruit, vegetables, forest products and a range of manufactured goods. Diversification of export markets and commodities was a priority for policymakers from the mid-1950s, and more so from the mid-1970s. Export incentives were a chosen instrument. Seafood and kiwifruit were among the most significant examples of primary sector diversification. The paper finds that the circumstances of each industry required different government policies, and that entrepreneurship and innovation were significant alongside government policy.

本文参考长期以来关于自然资源导向型增长的可持续性、出口多样化以及国家监管和鼓励作用的文献,讨论了新西兰在20世纪70年代和80年代的出口发展。自1970年以来,新西兰的出口商品结构已经多样化。曾经占主导地位的畜牧出口,现在由海鲜、葡萄酒、水果、蔬菜、林产品和一系列制成品补充。从20世纪50年代中期开始,出口市场和商品的多样化是政策制定者的优先事项,从70年代中期开始更是如此。出口激励是一种选择的手段。海产品和猕猴桃是初级部门多样化的最重要例子。本文发现,每个行业的情况需要不同的政府政策,创业和创新与政府政策一样重要。
{"title":"Export development in New Zealand: Kiwifruit and seafood 1975–1985","authors":"Jim McAloon","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12234","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12234","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper discusses export development in New Zealand in the 1970s and 1980s with reference to the long-running literature about the sustainability of natural resource-based growth, export diversification, and the role of state regulation and encouragement. Since 1970 New Zealand's export commodity mix has diversified. Pastoral exports, once dominant, are complemented by seafood, wine, fruit, vegetables, forest products and a range of manufactured goods. Diversification of export markets and commodities was a priority for policymakers from the mid-1950s, and more so from the mid-1970s. Export incentives were a chosen instrument. Seafood and kiwifruit were among the most significant examples of primary sector diversification. The paper finds that the circumstances of each industry required different government policies, and that entrepreneurship and innovation were significant alongside government policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"80-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45424389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Australian sailors wanted’: Labour supply and Australian shipping, c. 1870–c. 1914 “澳大利亚水手招聘”:1870 - 1870年左右的劳动力供应和澳大利亚航运。1914
Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12232
Dmytro Ostapenko, Diane Kirkby

In the pre-1914 era Australia did not develop an ocean-going merchant navy. The problem is well recognised in previous studies that assumed that it was high Australian wages that made the operational cost of deep-sea vessels uncompetitive on a global scale. This article reconstructs historical shifts in the Australian market for a seagoing workforce and demonstrates there was low recruitment of Australian labour. Drawing on new sources and inspired by efficiency wage theory the article argues that it was this shortage of a domestic labour supply that constrained the development of a national deep-sea shipping industry.

在1914年以前,澳大利亚没有发展远洋商船队。这个问题在之前的研究中得到了充分的认识,这些研究认为,是澳大利亚的高工资使深海船只的运营成本在全球范围内缺乏竞争力。这篇文章重建了澳大利亚海上劳动力市场的历史变迁,并证明了澳大利亚劳动力的低招聘。在效率工资理论的启发下,本文借鉴了新的资源,认为正是国内劳动力供应的短缺制约了国家深海航运业的发展。
{"title":"‘Australian sailors wanted’: Labour supply and Australian shipping, c. 1870–c. 1914","authors":"Dmytro Ostapenko,&nbsp;Diane Kirkby","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12232","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the pre-1914 era Australia did not develop an ocean-going merchant navy. The problem is well recognised in previous studies that assumed that it was high Australian wages that made the operational cost of deep-sea vessels uncompetitive on a global scale. This article reconstructs historical shifts in the Australian market for a seagoing workforce and demonstrates there was low recruitment of Australian labour. Drawing on new sources and inspired by efficiency wage theory the article argues that it was this shortage of a domestic labour supply that constrained the development of a national deep-sea shipping industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"62 2","pages":"141-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137650168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The gypsy economist. The life and times of Colin Clark. Alex MillmowSingapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, vii + 396 pp., ISBN 978-981-33-6945-0 吉普赛经济学家。科林·克拉克的生平和时代。Alex millmow新加坡:Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, vii + 396 pp, ISBN 978-981-33-6945-0
Pub Date : 2021-11-18 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12231
Claire E. F. Wright
{"title":"The gypsy economist. The life and times of Colin Clark. Alex MillmowSingapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, vii + 396 pp., ISBN 978-981-33-6945-0","authors":"Claire E. F. Wright","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12231","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12231","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"62 2","pages":"191-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46914140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fenjiashu: Economic development in the Chinese countryside based on household division inventories, ca. 1750–1910 分家书:基于家庭分工调查的中国农村经济发展,约1750-1910年
Pub Date : 2021-10-03 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12227
Meimei Wang, Bas van Leeuwen

Despite the existence of a rich literature on Chinese partial household division, there is still limited evidence of its effect on land and capital accumulation and well-being. In this study, contrary to the dominant view, we find that household property size peaked around 1800s–1830s, suggesting that equal-share system did not necessarily lead to land fragmentation. We find evidence that this rise in farm sizes is related to the opposing forces of increased well-being and increased inequality.

尽管存在丰富的中国部分家庭分工的文献,但其对土地和资本积累以及福祉的影响的证据仍然有限。在本研究中,与主流观点相反,我们发现家庭财产规模在19世纪至19世纪30年代左右达到顶峰,这表明平均份额制度并不一定导致土地破碎化。我们发现有证据表明,农场规模的增加与幸福感的增加和不平等的加剧这两种相反的力量有关。
{"title":"Fenjiashu: Economic development in the Chinese countryside based on household division inventories, ca. 1750–1910","authors":"Meimei Wang,&nbsp;Bas van Leeuwen","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12227","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the existence of a rich literature on Chinese partial household division, there is still limited evidence of its effect on land and capital accumulation and well-being. In this study, contrary to the dominant view, we find that household property size peaked around 1800s–1830s, suggesting that equal-share system did not necessarily lead to land fragmentation. We find evidence that this rise in farm sizes is related to the opposing forces of increased well-being and increased inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"252-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42145267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The great divergence on the Korean peninsula (1910–2020) 朝鲜半岛的大分裂(1910-2020)
Pub Date : 2021-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12225
Duol Kim

Before the 1960s, North Korea's GDP per capita was 30%–50% higher than South Korea's due to industrialisation during the 1930s. However, the governments of the two Koreas pursued different goals in the 1960s, which resulted in a reversal. The South Korean government made economic growth its ultimate goal. They did this by self-implementing, adjusting and instituting an export-oriented development strategy. On the other hand, the North Korean government tried to maximise its ability to survive by sacrificing gains from economies of scale. These differences brought about remarkable differences in economic performance. The gap between the two economies has continued to grow since the income level reversal in the 1970s.

在20世纪60年代之前,由于20世纪30年代的工业化,朝鲜的人均GDP比韩国高30%-50%。然而,在20世纪60年代,两国政府追求不同的目标,导致了逆转。韩国政府把经济增长作为最终目标。他们通过自我实施、调整和制定出口导向的发展战略实现了这一目标。另一方面,朝鲜政府试图通过牺牲规模经济的收益来最大化其生存能力。这些差异带来了显著的经济表现差异。自20世纪70年代收入水平逆转以来,两国经济之间的差距一直在扩大。
{"title":"The great divergence on the Korean peninsula (1910–2020)","authors":"Duol Kim","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12225","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12225","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Before the 1960s, North Korea's GDP per capita was 30%–50% higher than South Korea's due to industrialisation during the 1930s. However, the governments of the two Koreas pursued different goals in the 1960s, which resulted in a reversal. The South Korean government made economic growth its ultimate goal. They did this by self-implementing, adjusting and instituting an export-oriented development strategy. On the other hand, the North Korean government tried to maximise its ability to survive by sacrificing gains from economies of scale. These differences brought about remarkable differences in economic performance. The gap between the two economies has continued to grow since the income level reversal in the 1970s.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"318-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41956464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The economic history of Thailand: Old debates, recent advances, and future prospects 泰国的经济史:过去的争论、最近的进展和未来的展望
Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12224
Panarat Anamwathana, Jessica Vechbanyongratana

Despite slow development of Thai economic history scholarship, research output in the last three decades has shed new light and improved arguments on classic debates using novel primary sources and quantitative methods. This article traces the evolution of three Thai economic history debates from the late-nineteenth and twentieth centuries: (1) factors behind Thailand's slow economic growth; (2) the reluctance of rural workers to move into urban employment; and (3) the Thai government's failure to invest in large-scale irrigation projects. The article concludes with a discussion of current challenges facing Thai economic history research and suggestions to move the discipline forward.

尽管泰国经济史学术发展缓慢,但在过去三十年中,研究成果利用新颖的原始资料和定量方法,为经典辩论提供了新的亮点和改进的论点。本文追溯了19世纪末和20世纪以来三次泰国经济史争论的演变:(1)泰国经济缓慢增长背后的因素;(2)农民工不愿进入城镇就业;(3)泰国政府未能投资大型灌溉项目。文章最后讨论了当前泰国经济史研究面临的挑战,并提出了推进该学科发展的建议。
{"title":"The economic history of Thailand: Old debates, recent advances, and future prospects","authors":"Panarat Anamwathana,&nbsp;Jessica Vechbanyongratana","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12224","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12224","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite slow development of Thai economic history scholarship, research output in the last three decades has shed new light and improved arguments on classic debates using novel primary sources and quantitative methods. This article traces the evolution of three Thai economic history debates from the late-nineteenth and twentieth centuries: (1) factors behind Thailand's slow economic growth; (2) the reluctance of rural workers to move into urban employment; and (3) the Thai government's failure to invest in large-scale irrigation projects. The article concludes with a discussion of current challenges facing Thai economic history research and suggestions to move the discipline forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"342-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43960940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why geography matters to the economic history of India 为什么地理对印度的经济史如此重要
Pub Date : 2021-09-26 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12229
Tirthankar Roy

That geography shapes long-run economic change is almost an axiom in economic history, but there is neither adequate understanding nor much agreement about how this influence works. This article is an attempt to contextualise Indian economic history against what we now know of this influence. It is also an attempt to define the geographical condition of the South Asia region in a manner compatible with the purpose of economic history, which is to explain the deep roots of economic growth and inequality.

地理因素影响着长期经济变化,这几乎是经济史上的一个公理,但对于这种影响是如何起作用的,人们既没有充分的理解,也没有多少共识。本文试图将印度经济史与我们现在所知道的这种影响联系起来。它也是以符合经济史目的的方式界定南亚区域地理条件的一种尝试,经济史的目的是解释经济增长和不平等的深刻根源。
{"title":"Why geography matters to the economic history of India","authors":"Tirthankar Roy","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12229","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aehr.12229","url":null,"abstract":"<p>That geography shapes long-run economic change is almost an axiom in economic history, but there is neither adequate understanding nor much agreement about how this influence works. This article is an attempt to contextualise Indian economic history against what we now know of this influence. It is also an attempt to define the geographical condition of the South Asia region in a manner compatible with the purpose of economic history, which is to explain the deep roots of economic growth and inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"273-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49140950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The state in Chinese economic history 中国经济史上的国家
Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12226
Jiwei Qian, Tuan-Hwee Sng

We survey the recent economics and history literature on the Chinese state to investigate its role in China's long-term socioeconomic development. We highlight three insights. First, unlike in Europe, where interstate competition helped give rise to capitalist states with high capacity, the Chinese state emerged from a different historical context. Second, the 18th- and 19th-century Chinese state does not fit into the mould of a strong and extractive Oriental despotic state as once commonly believed. By conventional measures, early modern China had a weak state. Third, state building and centre-local relations are two useful dimensions to understand development and change in China's recent history and political economy. To adapt China to a changing world, Chinese state builders embarked on a long process of state building from the late-19th century through the Republican and Communist eras. Facilitated partly by regional decentralisation, the process now sees the Chinese state playing a substantially larger role in the economy and everyday life than any previous time in history.

我们调查了最近关于中国国家的经济学和历史文献,以调查其在中国长期社会经济发展中的作用。我们强调三点见解。首先,与欧洲不同的是,在欧洲,国家间的竞争促成了高产能的资本主义国家的崛起,而中国的国家产生于不同的历史背景。其次,18世纪和19世纪的中国并不像人们曾经普遍认为的那样,是一个强大的、掠夺成性的东方专制国家。按照传统标准,近代早期的中国是一个弱国。第三,国家建设和中央地方关系是理解中国近代史和政治经济发展变化的两个有用维度。为了使中国适应不断变化的世界,中国的国家建设者从19世纪末开始,经过共和和共产主义时代,开始了漫长的国家建设过程。在地区分权的推动下,如今中国政府在经济和日常生活中扮演的角色比历史上任何时候都要大得多。
{"title":"The state in Chinese economic history","authors":"Jiwei Qian,&nbsp;Tuan-Hwee Sng","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12226","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We survey the recent economics and history literature on the Chinese state to investigate its role in China's long-term socioeconomic development. We highlight three insights. First, unlike in Europe, where interstate competition helped give rise to capitalist states with high capacity, the Chinese state emerged from a different historical context. Second, the 18th- and 19th-century Chinese state does not fit into the mould of a strong and extractive Oriental despotic state as once commonly believed. By conventional measures, early modern China had a weak state. Third, state building and centre-local relations are two useful dimensions to understand development and change in China's recent history and political economy. To adapt China to a changing world, Chinese state builders embarked on a long process of state building from the late-19th century through the Republican and Communist eras. Facilitated partly by regional decentralisation, the process now sees the Chinese state playing a substantially larger role in the economy and everyday life than any previous time in history.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"359-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137869178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1