首页 > 最新文献

Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America最新文献

英文 中文
Soil carbon sequestration potential in subtropical grasslands estimated by DayCent-CABBI
Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.70003
Naoya Takeda, David Rowlings, William Parton, Liam Grace, Kenneth Day, Trung Nguyen, Peter Grace

Soil carbon (C) sequestration by restoring degraded grasslands with adequate management practices offers significant opportunities for climate change mitigation while remaining highly uncertain. In this study, a combination of a biogeochemical model DayCent-CABBI and eddy covariance (EC) flux towers was applied to evaluate soil C sequestration potential (at a depth of 0–0.3 m) of management strategies in subtropical grasslands. DayCent-CABBI was calibrated for grasslands in northeast Australia using biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) data from a long-term trial and then fine-tuned using EC flux tower data from seven sites in the region. The model was then validated with cumulative net ecosystem exchange, biomass, and SOC, resulting in root mean square errors of 1.16, 0.88, and 2.81 Mg C ha−1, respectively. The model was used to project long-term changes in SOC stocks under innovative management practices (time-controlled grazing and pasture legume incorporation), estimating soil C sequestration by 0.37–0.48 and 0.15–0.26 Mg C ha−1 year−1 toward 2050 with the respective practices. This study confirms the validity of the Measure, Model, and Verification (MMV) approach to estimate and project soil C sequestration for evaluating SOC methodologies by grassland management within a shorter period than soil sampling—measuring the baseline SOC, modeling the C dynamics with the calibrated DayCent-CABBI, and verifying the projected soil C sequestration with EC flux tower data.

{"title":"Soil carbon sequestration potential in subtropical grasslands estimated by DayCent-CABBI","authors":"Naoya Takeda,&nbsp;David Rowlings,&nbsp;William Parton,&nbsp;Liam Grace,&nbsp;Kenneth Day,&nbsp;Trung Nguyen,&nbsp;Peter Grace","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil carbon (C) sequestration by restoring degraded grasslands with adequate management practices offers significant opportunities for climate change mitigation while remaining highly uncertain. In this study, a combination of a biogeochemical model DayCent-CABBI and eddy covariance (EC) flux towers was applied to evaluate soil C sequestration potential (at a depth of 0–0.3 m) of management strategies in subtropical grasslands. DayCent-CABBI was calibrated for grasslands in northeast Australia using biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) data from a long-term trial and then fine-tuned using EC flux tower data from seven sites in the region. The model was then validated with cumulative net ecosystem exchange, biomass, and SOC, resulting in root mean square errors of 1.16, 0.88, and 2.81 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The model was used to project long-term changes in SOC stocks under innovative management practices (time-controlled grazing and pasture legume incorporation), estimating soil C sequestration by 0.37–0.48 and 0.15–0.26 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> toward 2050 with the respective practices. This study confirms the validity of the Measure, Model, and Verification (MMV) approach to estimate and project soil C sequestration for evaluating SOC methodologies by grassland management within a shorter period than soil sampling—measuring the baseline SOC, modeling the C dynamics with the calibrated DayCent-CABBI, and verifying the projected soil C sequestration with EC flux tower data.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143112642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Calibration of an apparent electrical conductivity sensor using capacitance probes for determining soil water content
Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20799
J. H. Barnard, J. A. Edeh, L. D. van Rensburg, C. C. du Preez

Soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) measurements, although more suitable for soil salinity quantification, are often used to determine volumetric soil water content, θv, in site-specific crop management. Generally, the approach is to develop a field-specific calibration function between ECa and measured θv, θv(m). Such a calibration function is possible when soil water dominates ECa at a field. When this is not the case, θv(m) data taken over time may be helpful to develop a function. Data regarding θv(m) can be costly and time-consuming as soil samples are needed to measure bulk density and gravimetric soil water. We postulate that capacitance probes, which measure scaled frequency (SF) as an indicator of the dielectric constant to estimate θv, can be used to establish ECa-θv calibration functions. Capacitance probes that simultaneously provide temperature readings allow for ECa to be temperature-corrected to 25°C, enabling development of ECa25-θv calibration functions. A field experiment was set up to establish whether SF readings can be used to estimate θv, θv(SF), in structured high montmorillonite clay soils accurately and determine if ECa25-θv(SF) calibration functions are possible. Our results revealed that a single SF-θv(m) calibration function representing 12 probes, or a specific soil form, is impossible. Each capacitance probe should be calibrated separately. The parameters for ECa25-θv(m) calibration functions were like ECa25-θv(SF) functions. The R2 for ECa25-θv(m) calibration functions was higher compared to the ECa25-θv(SF) functions. Further investigation of using capacitance probes to estimate θv for developing ECa-θv functions is needed before this approach can be applied confidently.

{"title":"Calibration of an apparent electrical conductivity sensor using capacitance probes for determining soil water content","authors":"J. H. Barnard,&nbsp;J. A. Edeh,&nbsp;L. D. van Rensburg,&nbsp;C. C. du Preez","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20799","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) measurements, although more suitable for soil salinity quantification, are often used to determine volumetric soil water content, <i>θ</i><sub>v</sub>, in site-specific crop management. Generally, the approach is to develop a field-specific calibration function between EC<sub>a</sub> and measured <i>θ</i><sub>v</sub>, <i>θ</i><sub>v(m)</sub>. Such a calibration function is possible when soil water dominates EC<sub>a</sub> at a field. When this is not the case, <i>θ</i><sub>v(m)</sub> data taken over time may be helpful to develop a function. Data regarding <i>θ</i><sub>v(m)</sub> can be costly and time-consuming as soil samples are needed to measure bulk density and gravimetric soil water. We postulate that capacitance probes, which measure scaled frequency (SF) as an indicator of the dielectric constant to estimate <i>θ</i><sub>v</sub>, can be used to establish EC<sub>a</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v</sub> calibration functions. Capacitance probes that simultaneously provide temperature readings allow for EC<sub>a</sub> to be temperature-corrected to 25°C, enabling development of EC<sub>a25</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v</sub> calibration functions. A field experiment was set up to establish whether SF readings can be used to estimate <i>θ</i><sub>v</sub>, <i>θ</i><sub>v(SF)</sub>, in structured high montmorillonite clay soils accurately and determine if EC<sub>a25</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v(SF)</sub> calibration functions are possible. Our results revealed that a single SF-<i>θ</i><sub>v(m)</sub> calibration function representing 12 probes, or a specific soil form, is impossible. Each capacitance probe should be calibrated separately. The parameters for EC<sub>a25</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v(m)</sub> calibration functions were like EC<sub>a25</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v(SF)</sub> functions. The <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> for EC<sub>a25</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v(m)</sub> calibration functions was higher compared to the EC<sub>a25</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v(SF)</sub> functions. Further investigation of using capacitance probes to estimate <i>θ</i><sub>v</sub> for developing EC<sub>a</sub>-<i>θ</i><sub>v</sub> functions is needed before this approach can be applied confidently.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20799","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143119896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organic cropping systems enhance soil health indicators in a Mollisol of the US Corn Belt
Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20795
Sabrina J. Ruis, John L. Kovar, Ken M. Wacha, Derek B. Carney, Peter L. O'Brien, Kathleen Delate, Cynthia A. Cambardella

Organic cropping systems may potentially improve soil and environmental health relative to simplified conventional systems due to the use of extended crop rotations, perennial crops, and animal manure. However, few studies have evaluated the impacts of organic row crop systems on a suite of soil health indicators relative to conventional systems across time. Thus, our objective was to assess how cropping system (conventional corn [Zea mays L.]–soybean [Glycine max L.] vs. organic corn–soybean–oat [Avena sativa L.]/alfalfa [Medicago sativa L.]–alfalfa vs. organic perennial pasture) and duration of management affect surface soil health indicators (soil biological, chemical, and physical properties) after 1–9 years of management in a Central Iowa Mollisol. Overall, the organic rotation improved six of 14 soil health indicators compared with the conventional system and the organic pasture improved eight indicators. The improved indicators included soil biological indicators, labile C and N pools, and wet-aggregate stability, but not organic C or total N concentrations. Organic systems had fewer effects on most soil chemical properties. The conventional system reduced soil C by 0.35 g kg−1 year−1 (r = −0.84, n = 9, = 0.005), unlike the organic systems in which soil C levels were generally maintained. The changes in soil health indicators were attributed to use of perennials, reductions in tillage frequency (during perennial phases), manure, and differing plant residue amounts among the three systems. In conclusion, organic cropping systems can enhance soil biological and related indicators in the medium term, but have fewer effects on soil fertility indicators under the conditions of this study.

{"title":"Organic cropping systems enhance soil health indicators in a Mollisol of the US Corn Belt","authors":"Sabrina J. Ruis,&nbsp;John L. Kovar,&nbsp;Ken M. Wacha,&nbsp;Derek B. Carney,&nbsp;Peter L. O'Brien,&nbsp;Kathleen Delate,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Cambardella","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20795","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic cropping systems may potentially improve soil and environmental health relative to simplified conventional systems due to the use of extended crop rotations, perennial crops, and animal manure. However, few studies have evaluated the impacts of organic row crop systems on a suite of soil health indicators relative to conventional systems across time. Thus, our objective was to assess how cropping system (conventional corn [<i>Zea mays</i> L.]–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> L.] vs. organic corn–soybean–oat [<i>Avena sativa</i> L.]/alfalfa [<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.]–alfalfa vs. organic perennial pasture) and duration of management affect surface soil health indicators (soil biological, chemical, and physical properties) after 1–9 years of management in a Central Iowa Mollisol. Overall, the organic rotation improved six of 14 soil health indicators compared with the conventional system and the organic pasture improved eight indicators. The improved indicators included soil biological indicators, labile C and N pools, and wet-aggregate stability, but not organic C or total N concentrations. Organic systems had fewer effects on most soil chemical properties. The conventional system reduced soil C by 0.35 g kg<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i> = −0.84, <i>n</i> = 9, <i>p </i>= 0.005), unlike the organic systems in which soil C levels were generally maintained. The changes in soil health indicators were attributed to use of perennials, reductions in tillage frequency (during perennial phases), manure, and differing plant residue amounts among the three systems. In conclusion, organic cropping systems can enhance soil biological and related indicators in the medium term, but have fewer effects on soil fertility indicators under the conditions of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration 用于实时表征土壤呼吸的便携式低成本培养室
Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20800
Thi Thuc Nguyen, Ariel Altman, Laibin Huang, Jorge L. Mazza Rodrigues, Helen E. Dahlke, Nina A. Kamennaya, Elad Levintal

Monitoring CO2 or O2 concentrations within a closed, volume-defined chamber is widely used to quantify soil respiration during laboratory soil incubation experiments. The standard method of using periodic manual gas sampling is costly, labor-intensive, and frequently fails to capture the aerobic respiration process. Thus, tools that allow continuous, real-time tracking of CO2 and O2 concentration changes are needed for soil respiration research. This study presents a new, portable, low-cost (∼$700), open-source sensor system to measure CO2 and O2 concentrations in four closed chambers. We provided non-engineering end-users with step-by-step instructions on how to build the system, enabling replication and customization. System performance was tested by comparing two respiration rates using the same soil—soil with and without glucose added for 1 week. Consistent CO2 production and O2 consumption rates were measured at 1-min intervals, and the reliability of the system was validated by a trace gas analyzer. Two distinctive continuous apparent respiratory quotient time series between two soil treatments were observed, with higher values of CO2 in glucose soil, demonstrating the ability of the system to capture ongoing respiration processes and sufficient sensitivity to distinguish differences among respiration substrates (i.e., glucose). The tested performance of the system highlights its capabilities for soil respiration research and the potential for further adoption in real-time gas monitoring applications.

在实验室土壤培养实验中,在封闭的、体积限定的室中监测CO2或O2浓度被广泛用于量化土壤呼吸。使用定期手动气体采样的标准方法是昂贵的,劳动密集型的,并且经常不能捕获有氧呼吸过程。因此,土壤呼吸研究需要能够连续、实时跟踪CO2和O2浓度变化的工具。本研究提出了一种新的、便携式、低成本(约700美元)的开源传感器系统,用于测量四个封闭腔中的CO2和O2浓度。我们为非工程最终用户提供了如何构建系统的分步说明,支持复制和自定义。系统性能测试通过比较两种呼吸速率使用相同的土壤-土壤添加和不添加葡萄糖1周。每隔1分钟测量一次一致的CO2产量和O2消耗率,并通过痕量气体分析仪验证系统的可靠性。在两种土壤处理之间观察到两个不同的连续表观呼吸商时间序列,葡萄糖土壤中CO2值较高,表明该系统能够捕捉正在进行的呼吸过程,并且具有足够的灵敏度来区分呼吸底物(即葡萄糖)之间的差异。该系统的测试性能突出了其在土壤呼吸研究方面的能力,以及在实时气体监测应用中进一步采用的潜力。
{"title":"A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration","authors":"Thi Thuc Nguyen,&nbsp;Ariel Altman,&nbsp;Laibin Huang,&nbsp;Jorge L. Mazza Rodrigues,&nbsp;Helen E. Dahlke,&nbsp;Nina A. Kamennaya,&nbsp;Elad Levintal","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20800","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monitoring CO<sub>2</sub> or O<sub>2</sub> concentrations within a closed, volume-defined chamber is widely used to quantify soil respiration during laboratory soil incubation experiments. The standard method of using periodic manual gas sampling is costly, labor-intensive, and frequently fails to capture the aerobic respiration process. Thus, tools that allow continuous, real-time tracking of CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> concentration changes are needed for soil respiration research. This study presents a new, portable, low-cost (∼$700), open-source sensor system to measure CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> concentrations in four closed chambers. We provided non-engineering end-users with step-by-step instructions on how to build the system, enabling replication and customization. System performance was tested by comparing two respiration rates using the same soil—soil with and without glucose added for 1 week. Consistent CO<sub>2</sub> production and O<sub>2</sub> consumption rates were measured at 1-min intervals, and the reliability of the system was validated by a trace gas analyzer. Two distinctive continuous apparent respiratory quotient time series between two soil treatments were observed, with higher values of CO<sub>2</sub> in glucose soil, demonstrating the ability of the system to capture ongoing respiration processes and sufficient sensitivity to distinguish differences among respiration substrates (i.e., glucose). The tested performance of the system highlights its capabilities for soil respiration research and the potential for further adoption in real-time gas monitoring applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20800","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon 新型缓释肥料促进氮素循环,增加土壤有机碳
Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20797
Katherine Coyle, Jedidian Adjei, Ehsan Abbasi, Princess Vargas, Lindsey Slaughter, Christian E. Alvarez-Pugliese, Gerardine G. Botte, Matthew G. Siebecker

In the coming decades, humanity will be faced with the challenge of feeding 10 billion people and managing large quantities of solid waste. These issues can be mitigated through the development of sustainable fertilizers derived from electrochemically treated waste activated sludge (EWAS) while promoting a nitrogen circular economy. This study investigates the chemistry of novel fertilizers to determine their soil chemistry dynamics. Untreated waste activated sludge (WAS) and EWAS were applied to agricultural soil and potting mix, and the resulting aqueous samples were analyzed to determine nitrogen, phosphorous, and carbon adsorption and release behaviors. Commercial inorganic and natural fertilizers were utilized for comparison. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy was performed to characterize phosphorus speciation in the solid phases of the novel fertilizers. Results indicated that EWAS and WAS samples released less total nitrogen into solution than other treatments due to organoclay complexation of biomolecules and differences in the solubility of the nitrogen species. Samples containing EWAS released a higher percentage of organic and total carbon into solution due to the deformation of the structure of the organic matter by the alkaline electrolysis process. The solubility of nitrogen and carbon in the sludge was increased by the electrochemical process. Solid-phase phosphorus in EWAS and WAS was characterized by XANES analysis as struvite, which is a novel finding with important implications for P management from waste-based fertilizers. These experimental findings suggest that fertilizing with EWAS could result in reduced runoff and improved soil health while facilitating domestic fertilizer production.

在未来几十年,人类将面临养活100亿人口和管理大量固体废物的挑战。这些问题可以通过开发从经电化学处理的废活性污泥(EWAS)中提取的可持续肥料来缓解,同时促进氮循环经济。本文研究了新型肥料的化学性质,以确定其土壤化学动态。将未经处理的废活性污泥(WAS)和EWAS分别施用于农业土壤和盆栽混合料中,并对得到的水样进行分析,以确定氮、磷和碳的吸附和释放行为。利用商品无机肥料和天然肥料进行比较。利用x射线吸收近边结构(XANES)光谱对新型肥料固相中磷的形态进行了表征。结果表明,与其他处理相比,EWAS和WAS样品释放的总氮较少,这是由于生物分子的有机粘土络合作用和氮种溶解度的差异。由于碱性电解过程中有机物结构的变形,含有EWAS的样品释放出较高比例的有机碳和总碳到溶液中。通过电化学处理提高了氮和碳在污泥中的溶解度。通过XANES分析,EWAS和WAS中的固相磷为鸟粪石,这一新发现对废基肥料的磷管理具有重要意义。这些试验结果表明,施用EWAS可以减少径流,改善土壤健康,同时促进国内肥料生产。
{"title":"Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon","authors":"Katherine Coyle,&nbsp;Jedidian Adjei,&nbsp;Ehsan Abbasi,&nbsp;Princess Vargas,&nbsp;Lindsey Slaughter,&nbsp;Christian E. Alvarez-Pugliese,&nbsp;Gerardine G. Botte,&nbsp;Matthew G. Siebecker","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20797","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20797","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the coming decades, humanity will be faced with the challenge of feeding 10 billion people and managing large quantities of solid waste. These issues can be mitigated through the development of sustainable fertilizers derived from electrochemically treated waste activated sludge (EWAS) while promoting a nitrogen circular economy. This study investigates the chemistry of novel fertilizers to determine their soil chemistry dynamics. Untreated waste activated sludge (WAS) and EWAS were applied to agricultural soil and potting mix, and the resulting aqueous samples were analyzed to determine nitrogen, phosphorous, and carbon adsorption and release behaviors. Commercial inorganic and natural fertilizers were utilized for comparison. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy was performed to characterize phosphorus speciation in the solid phases of the novel fertilizers. Results indicated that EWAS and WAS samples released less total nitrogen into solution than other treatments due to organoclay complexation of biomolecules and differences in the solubility of the nitrogen species. Samples containing EWAS released a higher percentage of organic and total carbon into solution due to the deformation of the structure of the organic matter by the alkaline electrolysis process. The solubility of nitrogen and carbon in the sludge was increased by the electrochemical process. Solid-phase phosphorus in EWAS and WAS was characterized by XANES analysis as struvite, which is a novel finding with important implications for P management from waste-based fertilizers. These experimental findings suggest that fertilizing with EWAS could result in reduced runoff and improved soil health while facilitating domestic fertilizer production.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum to: Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem 勘误:施用玉米秸秆和生物炭对亚热带水稻生态系统中土壤 δ13C 和有机碳源的影响
Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20798

Jin, Q., Wang, W., Liu, X., Lin, S., Sardans, J., Fang, Y., Vancov, T., Tariq, A., Zeng, F., & Peñuelas, J. (2024). Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 88, 2254–2265. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20773

There are mismatches and omissions in the “Funding information” section.

This funding was incorrectly stated as: Hubei University of Science and Technology Doctoral Start-up Fund Project, Grant/Award Numbers: BK202312, BK202313; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España, Grant/Award Numbers: PID2019-110521GB-I00, PID2020-115770RB-I00; National Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 41571287, 42077087; Departament d'Innovació, Universitats i Empresa, Generalitat de Catalunya, Grant/Award Number: SGR 2017-1005. This funding is corrected here as: National Science Foundation of China (42077086; 41571287); Youth Program of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2024AFB323); Hubei University of Science and Technology Doctoral Start-up Fund Project (BK202312; BK202313); Spanish Government grants PID2020115770RB-I, PID2022-140808NB-I00, and TED2021-132627 B–I00 funded by MCIN, AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033 European Union Next Generation EU/PRTR.

We apologize for these errors.

Jin, Q., Wang, W., Liu, X., Lin, S., Sardans, J., Fang, Y., Vancov, T., Tariq, A., Zeng, F., & Peñuelas, J. (2024)。施用玉米残茬和生物炭对亚热带水稻生态系统土壤 δ13C 和有机碳源的影响。美国土壤科学学会杂志,88,2254-2265。https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20773There,"资助信息 "部分存在错配和遗漏。这项资助被错误地表述为:湖北科技学院博士启动基金项目,资助/奖励编号:BK202312, BK202313; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España, Grant/Award Numbers:PID2019-110521GB-I00, PID2020-115770RB-I00; National Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers:41571287、42077087;加泰罗尼亚自治区创新、大学和企业部,资助/奖励编号:SGR 2017-1005:SGR 2017-1005。该经费在此更正为中国国家自然科学基金(42077086;41571287);湖北省自然科学基金青年项目(2024AFB323);湖北科技学院博士启动基金项目(BK202312;BK202313);西班牙政府基金PID2020115770RB-I、PID2022-140808NB-I00和TED2021-132627 B-I00,由MCIN、AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033欧盟下一代EU/PRTR资助。我们对这些错误表示歉意。
{"title":"Erratum to: Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20798","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Jin, Q., Wang, W., Liu, X., Lin, S., Sardans, J., Fang, Y., Vancov, T., Tariq, A., Zeng, F., &amp; Peñuelas, J. (2024). Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, 88, 2254–2265. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20773</p><p>There are mismatches and omissions in the “Funding information” section.</p><p>This funding was incorrectly stated as: Hubei University of Science and Technology Doctoral Start-up Fund Project, Grant/Award Numbers: BK202312, BK202313; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España, Grant/Award Numbers: PID2019-110521GB-I00, PID2020-115770RB-I00; National Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 41571287, 42077087; Departament d'Innovació, Universitats i Empresa, Generalitat de Catalunya, Grant/Award Number: SGR 2017-1005. This funding is corrected here as: National Science Foundation of China (42077086; 41571287); Youth Program of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2024AFB323); Hubei University of Science and Technology Doctoral Start-up Fund Project (BK202312; BK202313); Spanish Government grants PID2020115770RB-I, PID2022-140808NB-I00, and TED2021-132627 B–I00 funded by MCIN, AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033 European Union Next Generation EU/PRTR.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20798","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microbial inocula enhance effects of biochar amendments on crop productivity, soil health, and microbial communities: A meta-analysis 微生物接种提高了生物炭改良对作物生产力、土壤健康和微生物群落的影响:一项荟萃分析
Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20792
Aysha Tapp Ross, Sarah M. Emery

Biochar as a soil amendment can increase soil carbon sequestration, soil microbial diversity, overall yields, and general soil functioning. To accelerate these effects, biochar is often activated with beneficial soil microbes such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or plant growth promoting bacteria via microbial inocula. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the effects of microbial inoculum additions for biochar amendments. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the crop and soil effects of adding biochar alone compared to adding biochar with a microbial inoculum. The meta-analysis included 56 studies and examined whether the effects depended on the source of inoculum, inoculum type, or experiment type. We found that microbial inocula increased soil N and soil organic carbon concentrations and crop productivity compared to adding biochar alone. However, these effects were limited to locally sourced and research-grade inocula, while commercial inoculum products only slightly increased soil P. Fungal inocula had stronger effects than bacterial inocula. Inoculum effects were the strongest in greenhouse studies, increasing N, plant productivity, and fungal abundance, while field studies only increased plant productivity, suggesting that biochar activation with inoculum in on-farm settings may not provide intended positive effects, and thus alternative methods for biochar activation may be needed.

生物炭作为土壤改良剂可以增加土壤固碳、土壤微生物多样性、总产量和一般土壤功能。为了加速这些效果,生物炭通常被有益的土壤微生物激活,如丛枝菌根真菌或通过微生物接种促进植物生长的细菌。然而,目前还没有对添加微生物接种物对生物炭改性的影响进行全面的综述。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以量化单独添加生物炭与微生物接种物添加生物炭对作物和土壤的影响。荟萃分析包括56项研究,并检查了影响是否取决于接种源、接种类型或实验类型。研究发现,与单独添加生物炭相比,接种微生物剂可提高土壤氮和土壤有机碳浓度,提高作物生产力。然而,这些影响仅限于本地来源和研究级接种,而商业接种产品仅略微增加土壤P.真菌接种比细菌接种的效果更强。在温室研究中,接种效应最强,增加了氮素、植物生产力和真菌丰度,而实地研究仅提高了植物生产力,这表明在农场环境下用接种物激活生物炭可能不会产生预期的积极效果,因此可能需要其他方法来激活生物炭。
{"title":"Microbial inocula enhance effects of biochar amendments on crop productivity, soil health, and microbial communities: A meta-analysis","authors":"Aysha Tapp Ross,&nbsp;Sarah M. Emery","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20792","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biochar as a soil amendment can increase soil carbon sequestration, soil microbial diversity, overall yields, and general soil functioning. To accelerate these effects, biochar is often activated with beneficial soil microbes such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or plant growth promoting bacteria via microbial inocula. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the effects of microbial inoculum additions for biochar amendments. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the crop and soil effects of adding biochar alone compared to adding biochar with a microbial inoculum. The meta-analysis included 56 studies and examined whether the effects depended on the source of inoculum, inoculum type, or experiment type. We found that microbial inocula increased soil N and soil organic carbon concentrations and crop productivity compared to adding biochar alone. However, these effects were limited to locally sourced and research-grade inocula, while commercial inoculum products only slightly increased soil P. Fungal inocula had stronger effects than bacterial inocula. Inoculum effects were the strongest in greenhouse studies, increasing N, plant productivity, and fungal abundance, while field studies only increased plant productivity, suggesting that biochar activation with inoculum in on-farm settings may not provide intended positive effects, and thus alternative methods for biochar activation may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new mathematical solution of convection-dispersion equation to describe solute transport in heterogeneous soils 描述非均质土壤中溶质迁移的对流-色散方程的一种新的数学解
Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20794
Xiufu Shuai

There was a long-time debate about the validation of the convection-dispersion equation (CDE) and its replacement with the well-known convective lognormal transfer function model (CLT) to describe solute transport in a heterogeneous soil with uniformity at the longitudinal water flow direction and nonuniformity at the transverse direction. The objective of this study is to prove that the CDE is valid and almost identical to the CLT. Gamma probability density function (pdf) was initially assumed in this study to describe the distribution of pore-water velocity across capillary tubes in a heterogeneous soil. The capillary bundle model was used to describe solute transport without transverse solute mixing between adjacent tubes. The inverse-gamma function, a new mathematical solution of the CDE differential equation with scale-dependent dispersivity, was initially derived from the capillary bundle model and the gamma pdf. The only difference between the inverse-gamma function and the CLT is that lognormal pdf of pore-water velocity is assumed in the CLT while the two pdfs are close to each other. The inverse-gamma function and the CLT were tested with the published data from the miscible displacement experiments on the two repacked soils with different aggregate sizes. Results show that both the inverse-gamma function and the CLT fit the measured breakthrough curves in the miscible displacement experiments. The estimates of the squared coefficient of variation of the pore-water velocity in the gamma pdf were 0.314 and 0.0582 for the two soils, and they were consistent with the lognormal pdf in the CLT.

关于对流-色散方程(CDE)的有效性以及用众所周知的对流对数正态传递函数模型(CLT)代替它来描述水在纵向均匀而横向不均匀的非均质土壤中的溶质输运,存在着长期的争论。本研究的目的是证明CDE是有效的,几乎相同的CLT。本研究最初假设伽马概率密度函数(pdf)来描述非均质土壤中毛细血管间孔隙水流速的分布。毛细管束模型用于描述溶质在相邻管间无横向混合的输运。基于毛细管束模型和伽玛函数,提出了具有尺度相关色散的CDE微分方程的一种新的数学解——反伽玛函数。反伽马函数与CLT的唯一区别是,在CLT中假设孔隙水速度的对数正态pdf,而两者的pdf非常接近。利用已发表的两种不同粒径重填土的混相位移试验数据,对反函数和CLT进行了验证。结果表明,在混相驱替实验中,反伽马函数和CLT均与实测突破曲线拟合。两种土壤的孔隙水速度变异系数的平方估计值分别为0.314和0.0582,与CLT的对数正态pdf一致。
{"title":"A new mathematical solution of convection-dispersion equation to describe solute transport in heterogeneous soils","authors":"Xiufu Shuai","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20794","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There was a long-time debate about the validation of the convection-dispersion equation (CDE) and its replacement with the well-known convective lognormal transfer function model (CLT) to describe solute transport in a heterogeneous soil with uniformity at the longitudinal water flow direction and nonuniformity at the transverse direction. The objective of this study is to prove that the CDE is valid and almost identical to the CLT. Gamma probability density function (pdf) was initially assumed in this study to describe the distribution of pore-water velocity across capillary tubes in a heterogeneous soil. The capillary bundle model was used to describe solute transport without transverse solute mixing between adjacent tubes. The inverse-gamma function, a new mathematical solution of the CDE differential equation with scale-dependent dispersivity, was initially derived from the capillary bundle model and the gamma pdf. The only difference between the inverse-gamma function and the CLT is that lognormal pdf of pore-water velocity is assumed in the CLT while the two pdfs are close to each other. The inverse-gamma function and the CLT were tested with the published data from the miscible displacement experiments on the two repacked soils with different aggregate sizes. Results show that both the inverse-gamma function and the CLT fit the measured breakthrough curves in the miscible displacement experiments. The estimates of the squared coefficient of variation of the pore-water velocity in the gamma pdf were 0.314 and 0.0582 for the two soils, and they were consistent with the lognormal pdf in the CLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142763936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of laser diffractometry and pipetting methods for particle size determination: A pilot study on the implications of result discrepancies on soil classification 激光衍射法和移液法测定粒度的比较:对土壤分类结果差异影响的初步研究
Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20791
Gabriela Tomášová, Stanislav Paseka, Aleš Bajer

In recent decades, the determination of particle size distribution (PSD) using the laser diffraction method (LDM) has become increasingly common, supplanting traditional sedimentation techniques. Advances in everything from sample preparation to software settings have been realized globally, whether through recommendations from laser diffraction (LD) manufacturers or through user experiences. These developments seek to enhance accuracy and diminish the uncertainties associated with new methodologies. Particularly in the determination of PSD using LDM on various LD instruments and in comparison with the sieve–pipette method (SPM), discrepancies in PSD frequently arise. This article aims to mitigate these discrepancies by predefining parameters, specifically through the adjustment of LD software settings and sample preparation (employing a uniform set of dispersed samples in potassium hydroxide) on two widely used LD instruments for soil measurements: Mastersizer 3000 and Analysette 22. Additionally, these samples were analyzed using the traditional SPM (ISO 11277, 1998), with the results from LDM and SPM subsequently compared. The paper also explores the impact, range of user options, and limitations of predefined software settings on both LD instruments. Eighty soil samples were analyzed for PSD, collected from arable land in the cadastral area of Hrušky, district of Břeclav (Czech Republic), in spring 2022, from depths of 0- to 10-cm and 10- to 20-cm. Significant differences in PSD were confirmed, although the trends of the grain size distribution curves were very similar to those of LDM. Results from the Mastersizer underestimated the clay fraction by an average of 17% compared to SPM, at the expense of the sand fraction, whereas the silt fraction was underestimated by a maximum of 4%. Conversely, Analysette 22 overestimated the silt fraction by an average of 37% at the expense of the sand fraction, confirming only a slight difference in the clay fraction: 3%. Moreover, the quantity of sample entering the dispersion unit was identified as a significant issue when comparing LD instruments, despite the obscuration value being nearly identical, that is, 20%–30%. Therefore, it was not possible to achieve the same or similar weight when introducing suspension into circulation. The robustness of the obtained results underscores the importance of understanding input parameters when interpreting results between different methods.

近几十年来,利用激光衍射法(LDM)测定颗粒尺寸分布(PSD)已经越来越普遍,取代了传统的沉积技术。无论是通过激光衍射(LD)制造商的建议还是通过用户体验,从样品制备到软件设置的一切进步都已在全球范围内实现。这些发展力求提高准确性,减少与新方法有关的不确定性。特别是在各种LD仪器上使用LDM测定PSD,并与筛移液法(SPM)进行比较时,PSD经常出现差异。本文旨在通过预先定义参数来减轻这些差异,特别是通过调整LD软件设置和样品制备(在氢氧化钾中使用一组均匀的分散样品)两种广泛使用的LD土壤测量仪器:Mastersizer 3000和Analysette 22。此外,使用传统的SPM (ISO 11277, 1998)对这些样品进行分析,随后将LDM和SPM的结果进行比较。本文还探讨了影响,范围的用户选择,以及预定义的软件设置的局限性,在两个LD仪器。对2022年春季在Břeclav(捷克共和国)区Hrušky地籍区耕地上采集的80个土壤样本进行了PSD分析,深度分别为0- 10 cm和10- 20 cm。尽管PSD的粒度分布曲线与LDM的趋势非常相似,但PSD的差异仍显着。与SPM相比,母粒机的结果平均低估了17%的粘土组分,而砂粒组分则被低估了4%。相反,Analysette 22以砂土含量为代价,平均高估了粉土含量37%,而粘土含量只有3%的微小差异。此外,在比较LD仪器时,进入色散单元的样品数量被认为是一个重要问题,尽管模糊值几乎相同,即20%-30%。因此,当将悬浮液引入循环系统时,不可能达到相同或相似的重量。所获得结果的稳健性强调了在解释不同方法之间的结果时理解输入参数的重要性。
{"title":"Comparison of laser diffractometry and pipetting methods for particle size determination: A pilot study on the implications of result discrepancies on soil classification","authors":"Gabriela Tomášová,&nbsp;Stanislav Paseka,&nbsp;Aleš Bajer","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20791","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent decades, the determination of particle size distribution (PSD) using the laser diffraction method (LDM) has become increasingly common, supplanting traditional sedimentation techniques. Advances in everything from sample preparation to software settings have been realized globally, whether through recommendations from laser diffraction (LD) manufacturers or through user experiences. These developments seek to enhance accuracy and diminish the uncertainties associated with new methodologies. Particularly in the determination of PSD using LDM on various LD instruments and in comparison with the sieve–pipette method (SPM), discrepancies in PSD frequently arise. This article aims to mitigate these discrepancies by predefining parameters, specifically through the adjustment of LD software settings and sample preparation (employing a uniform set of dispersed samples in potassium hydroxide) on two widely used LD instruments for soil measurements: Mastersizer 3000 and Analysette 22. Additionally, these samples were analyzed using the traditional SPM (ISO 11277, 1998), with the results from LDM and SPM subsequently compared. The paper also explores the impact, range of user options, and limitations of predefined software settings on both LD instruments. Eighty soil samples were analyzed for PSD, collected from arable land in the cadastral area of Hrušky, district of Břeclav (Czech Republic), in spring 2022, from depths of 0- to 10-cm and 10- to 20-cm. Significant differences in PSD were confirmed, although the trends of the grain size distribution curves were very similar to those of LDM. Results from the Mastersizer underestimated the clay fraction by an average of 17% compared to SPM, at the expense of the sand fraction, whereas the silt fraction was underestimated by a maximum of 4%. Conversely, Analysette 22 overestimated the silt fraction by an average of 37% at the expense of the sand fraction, confirming only a slight difference in the clay fraction: 3%. Moreover, the quantity of sample entering the dispersion unit was identified as a significant issue when comparing LD instruments, despite the obscuration value being nearly identical, that is, 20%–30%. Therefore, it was not possible to achieve the same or similar weight when introducing suspension into circulation. The robustness of the obtained results underscores the importance of understanding input parameters when interpreting results between different methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20791","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142763934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soil amendments alter tree growth and wood decay after forest thinning 土壤改良剂改变了森林间伐后树木的生长和木材的腐烂
Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20782
Deborah S. Page-Dumroese, Martin F. Jurgensen, Chris A. Miller, Joanne M. Tirocke, Derek N. Pierson, Cole Mayn, Mark J. Kimsey, Haley C. Anderson

Forest soil amendments are increasingly used in western US forests to dispose of unmerchantable woody residues, reduce wildfire risk, and improve soil properties. Our objective was to determine the effect of fertilizer and organic amendments on tree growth and organic matter decomposition after thinning. Treatments were a control, three single soil amendments (wood chips, fertilizer, and biochar), and one combined soil amendment (biochar + fertilizer), each applied after thinning a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex. Laws) stand. After 10 years, amendment treatments had no effect on tree diameter increment (p = 0.600), but the biochar + fertilizer and wood chip treatments significantly increased height growth (p = 0.006). To estimate belowground biological changes, we used wood stakes made from aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) as an index of microbial activity. Stakes were placed: (1) on top of the litter/amendments, (2) at the interface between the litter/amendments and mineral soil, and (3) vertically inserted into the mineral soil, and stake mass loss was measured over 5 years. Stake mass loss of each species was least on the soil surface and increased with increasing depth. Aspen stakes generally had greater mass loss at all three soil locations in the fertilizer and biochar treatments. In contrast, pine stake mass loss was lower than aspen and less affected by fertilizer. Using thinned tree biomass to create amendments can improve forest productivity by enhancing soil conditions and mitigating wildfire. However, the impact of amendments on tree growth may take decades to be detectable.

森林土壤改良剂越来越多地用于美国西部森林,以处理滞销的木质残留物,减少野火风险,改善土壤性质。我们的目的是确定肥料和有机改良剂对树木生长和间伐后有机质分解的影响。处理为对照、三种单一土壤改良剂(木屑、肥料和生物炭)和一种复合土壤改良剂(生物炭+肥料),每一种处理都在黄松(Pinus ponderosa Dougl)疏林后施用。例:法律)成立。10年后,改良处理对树径增长量没有影响(p = 0.600),而生物炭+肥料和木屑处理显著提高了树高增长量(p = 0.006)。为了估计地下生物变化,我们使用白杨(Populus tremuloides Michx.)和火炬松(Pinus taeda L.)木桩作为微生物活性指标。木桩放置于:(1)凋落物/改良剂的顶部,(2)凋落物/改良剂与矿质土的交界面,(3)垂直插入矿质土中,测量了5年内木桩的质量损失。各树种木桩质量损失在土壤表层最小,随深度增加而增加。在施用化肥和生物炭的三个土壤位置上,白杨桩的质量损失普遍较大。相比之下,松木的质量损失低于白杨,且受肥料影响较小。利用稀薄的树木生物量来制造改良剂可以通过改善土壤条件和减轻野火来提高森林生产力。然而,修订对树木生长的影响可能需要几十年才能检测到。
{"title":"Soil amendments alter tree growth and wood decay after forest thinning","authors":"Deborah S. Page-Dumroese,&nbsp;Martin F. Jurgensen,&nbsp;Chris A. Miller,&nbsp;Joanne M. Tirocke,&nbsp;Derek N. Pierson,&nbsp;Cole Mayn,&nbsp;Mark J. Kimsey,&nbsp;Haley C. Anderson","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20782","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest soil amendments are increasingly used in western US forests to dispose of unmerchantable woody residues, reduce wildfire risk, and improve soil properties. Our objective was to determine the effect of fertilizer and organic amendments on tree growth and organic matter decomposition after thinning. Treatments were a control, three single soil amendments (wood chips, fertilizer, and biochar), and one combined soil amendment (biochar + fertilizer), each applied after thinning a ponderosa pine (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i> Dougl. ex. Laws) stand. After 10 years, amendment treatments had no effect on tree diameter increment (<i>p</i> = 0.600), but the biochar + fertilizer and wood chip treatments significantly increased height growth (<i>p</i> = 0.006). To estimate belowground biological changes, we used wood stakes made from aspen (<i>Populus tremuloides</i> Michx.) and loblolly pine (<i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) as an index of microbial activity. Stakes were placed: (1) on top of the litter/amendments, (2) at the interface between the litter/amendments and mineral soil, and (3) vertically inserted into the mineral soil, and stake mass loss was measured over 5 years. Stake mass loss of each species was least on the soil surface and increased with increasing depth. Aspen stakes generally had greater mass loss at all three soil locations in the fertilizer and biochar treatments. In contrast, pine stake mass loss was lower than aspen and less affected by fertilizer. Using thinned tree biomass to create amendments can improve forest productivity by enhancing soil conditions and mitigating wildfire. However, the impact of amendments on tree growth may take decades to be detectable.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142762208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1