Hongyu Liu, Wencong Liang, Guiwan Yan, Xiaoqian Duan, Yusong Deng
In the karst region of southwestern China, limited land resources and intense human-land conflict pose challenges to sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivation, a key economic crop. Sloping farmland is particularly vulnerable to water erosion, causing soil, water, and nutrient losses that hinder sustainable agriculture. Results show that runoff and sediment production vary significantly (p < 0.05) with rainfall intensity and sugarcane growth stages. Compared to conventional downslope tillage, contour tillage combined with straw mulching and trenching reduced runoff and sediment yield by 39.90% and 88.32%, respectively. Nutrient loss was mainly driven by sediment transport, with nutrient retention varying among tillage methods. Contour tillage with straw mulching and trenching effectively retained soil organic carbon, total phosphorus, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium, while contour deep tillage with biochar was more effective in preserving total nitrogen and total potassium. Path analysis revealed that sediment yield had stronger correlations and path coefficients with nutrient losses than with runoff. These findings provide a scientific basis for soil and water conservation strategies and the selection of sustainable tillage practices for sloping farmland in karst regions.
{"title":"How to plant sugarcane on sloping farmland to reduce soil erosion and nutrient loss in karst region","authors":"Hongyu Liu, Wencong Liang, Guiwan Yan, Xiaoqian Duan, Yusong Deng","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70170","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the karst region of southwestern China, limited land resources and intense human-land conflict pose challenges to sugarcane (<i>Saccharum officinarum</i> L.) cultivation, a key economic crop. Sloping farmland is particularly vulnerable to water erosion, causing soil, water, and nutrient losses that hinder sustainable agriculture. Results show that runoff and sediment production vary significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with rainfall intensity and sugarcane growth stages. Compared to conventional downslope tillage, contour tillage combined with straw mulching and trenching reduced runoff and sediment yield by 39.90% and 88.32%, respectively. Nutrient loss was mainly driven by sediment transport, with nutrient retention varying among tillage methods. Contour tillage with straw mulching and trenching effectively retained soil organic carbon, total phosphorus, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium, while contour deep tillage with biochar was more effective in preserving total nitrogen and total potassium. Path analysis revealed that sediment yield had stronger correlations and path coefficients with nutrient losses than with runoff. These findings provide a scientific basis for soil and water conservation strategies and the selection of sustainable tillage practices for sloping farmland in karst regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fereshteh Shahriari, Adi Kunarso, Ryan Farquharson, Samantha Grover
Tropical peatlands are globally significant carbon (C) pools, and effective monitoring of their condition is crucial to preserving these stores and preventing further carbon loss. Spectroscopic techniques provide valuable insights into the specific carbon functional groups within organic matter, offering a rapid and cost-effective alternative to conventional soil analyses. Despite increasing recognition of their potential, no attempt has been made to evaluate the existing scientific literature on the application of spectroscopy on tropical peat soils. This paper reports on the results of a quantitative systematic review of 32 peer-reviewed English-language scientific literature that have applied spectroscopy to whole tropical peat soils. Most of these studies were undertaken in Malaysia (12) and Indonesia (10), areas experiencing the most rapid land use conversion of tropical peatlands. However, there is a notable scarcity of studies from other areas where large areas of tropical peatland occur, including Africa and South America. Infrared spectroscopy in the mid-infrared range and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were the most reported spectroscopic techniques. Most studies using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy employed attenuated total reflectance mode (nine), while two studies used diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform mode, and seven studies used the classic KBr pellet transmission method. One study utilized Raman spectroscopy, one used visible near-infrared, and none applied photoacoustic spectroscopy, the latter being theoretically promising for highly absorbing organic samples especially where pyrogenic carbon is present. This review identifies key research gaps, including assessing the potential application of spectroscopy combined with chemometric techniques to predict a wide range of tropical peat soil properties. The importance of international collaboration and the development of standard sample preparation methods to enable comparison between studies is highlighted. Implementation of these recommendations could help to fast track the development of rapid and cost-effective spectroscopic approaches to monitor peatland condition.
{"title":"Spectroscopic techniques for tropical peat soil analysis: Current applications and future opportunities","authors":"Fereshteh Shahriari, Adi Kunarso, Ryan Farquharson, Samantha Grover","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70169","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tropical peatlands are globally significant carbon (C) pools, and effective monitoring of their condition is crucial to preserving these stores and preventing further carbon loss. Spectroscopic techniques provide valuable insights into the specific carbon functional groups within organic matter, offering a rapid and cost-effective alternative to conventional soil analyses. Despite increasing recognition of their potential, no attempt has been made to evaluate the existing scientific literature on the application of spectroscopy on tropical peat soils. This paper reports on the results of a quantitative systematic review of 32 peer-reviewed English-language scientific literature that have applied spectroscopy to whole tropical peat soils. Most of these studies were undertaken in Malaysia (12) and Indonesia (10), areas experiencing the most rapid land use conversion of tropical peatlands. However, there is a notable scarcity of studies from other areas where large areas of tropical peatland occur, including Africa and South America. Infrared spectroscopy in the mid-infrared range and <sup>13</sup>C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were the most reported spectroscopic techniques. Most studies using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy employed attenuated total reflectance mode (nine), while two studies used diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform mode, and seven studies used the classic KBr pellet transmission method. One study utilized Raman spectroscopy, one used visible near-infrared, and none applied photoacoustic spectroscopy, the latter being theoretically promising for highly absorbing organic samples especially where pyrogenic carbon is present. This review identifies key research gaps, including assessing the potential application of spectroscopy combined with chemometric techniques to predict a wide range of tropical peat soil properties. The importance of international collaboration and the development of standard sample preparation methods to enable comparison between studies is highlighted. Implementation of these recommendations could help to fast track the development of rapid and cost-effective spectroscopic approaches to monitor peatland condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The efficacy of empty oil palm fruit bunch (EFB) on crop productivity was evaluated by examining the effect of a one-time application of EFB biochar and compost on soil properties, okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency, and yields across two cropping cycles. Treatments involved EFB biochar at 10 and 20 t ha−1 (B10 and B20), EFB compost at 20 t ha−1 (CP20), combinations of biochar and compost (B10CP20 and B20CP20), an unamended control (B0), and an inorganic fertilizer treatment (NPK). Soil chemical properties, okra yield, and microbial biomass were assessed using the whole-cell fatty acid (WCFA) profiling method. The results showed that both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle. CP20 and B20CP20 treatments increased yield by 58% and 100%, respectively, compared to the mineral fertilizer treatment. These treatments also enhanced phosphorus uptake and recovery efficiency, primarily due to increased soil pH and improved nutrient availability. B20CP20 was especially effective in boosting cation exchange capacity (CEC) and micronutrient content. The presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the CP20 treatment was associated with improved phosphorus uptake and recovery in the second cycle. However, an overall decline in soil CEC and total organic carbon by an average of 16% and 25%, respectively, resulted in a threefold yield reduction in the second cycle. Importantly, only the B20CP20 treatment sustained yield increases into the second cycle. The study demonstrates that a one-time co-application of EFB biochar and compost can enhance soil fertility and soil microbial properties and increase nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies, resulting in increased okra yields.
{"title":"Empty oil palm fruit bunch biochar and compost influence soil properties that drive okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) nutrient use efficiency and yield","authors":"Dorcas Blankson, Emmanuel Arthur, Kofi Atiah, Kwame Agyei Frimpong, Patrick Manfo, Sabine Ravnskov","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70172","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The efficacy of empty oil palm fruit bunch (EFB) on crop productivity was evaluated by examining the effect of a one-time application of EFB biochar and compost on soil properties, okra (<i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i> L.) nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency, and yields across two cropping cycles. Treatments involved EFB biochar at 10 and 20 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (B10 and B20), EFB compost at 20 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (CP20), combinations of biochar and compost (B10CP20 and B20CP20), an unamended control (B0), and an inorganic fertilizer treatment (NPK). Soil chemical properties, okra yield, and microbial biomass were assessed using the whole-cell fatty acid (WCFA) profiling method. The results showed that both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle. CP20 and B20CP20 treatments increased yield by 58% and 100%, respectively, compared to the mineral fertilizer treatment. These treatments also enhanced phosphorus uptake and recovery efficiency, primarily due to increased soil pH and improved nutrient availability. B20CP20 was especially effective in boosting cation exchange capacity (CEC) and micronutrient content. The presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the CP20 treatment was associated with improved phosphorus uptake and recovery in the second cycle. However, an overall decline in soil CEC and total organic carbon by an average of 16% and 25%, respectively, resulted in a threefold yield reduction in the second cycle. Importantly, only the B20CP20 treatment sustained yield increases into the second cycle. The study demonstrates that a one-time co-application of EFB biochar and compost can enhance soil fertility and soil microbial properties and increase nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies, resulting in increased okra yields.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
de Lima, R. P., Tormena, C.A., Menillo, R. B., La Scala Júnior, N., da Silva, A.R., Souza, Z. M., Cerri, C. E. P., & Cherubin, M. R. (2025). Correlation of total organic C, particulate and mineral-associated C fractions with strength indicators in Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89, e70141. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70141
A funding source was inadvertently left out of the Funding Information and Acknowledgments. The Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture (CCARBON) – São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant 21/10573-4) has now been added to the Funding Information on the title page. The Acknowledgments section has also been updated to add the following sentence “We gratefully acknowledge support from the Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture (CCARBON) – São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant 21/10573-4).”
We apologize for this error.
de Lima, r.p., Tormena, c.a., Menillo, r.b., La Scala Júnior, N., da Silva, a.r., Souza, Z. M., Cerri, c.e.p, & Cherubin, m.r.(2025)。土壤中总有机碳、颗粒碳和矿物相关碳组分与强度指标的相关性土壤学报,29(4):444 - 444。https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70141A资金来源被无意中遗漏在资助信息和致谢中。热带农业碳研究中心(CCARBON) - 圣保罗研究基金会(FAPESP,赠款21/10573-4)现已添加到标题页的资助信息中。致谢部分也已更新,增加了以下句子“我们感谢来自热带农业碳研究中心(CCARBON) - 圣保罗研究基金会(FAPESP,赠款21/10573-4)的支持。”我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Correlation of total organic C, particulate and mineral-associated C fractions with strength indicators in Oxisols”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70175","url":null,"abstract":"<p>de Lima, R. P., Tormena, C.A., Menillo, R. B., La Scala Júnior, N., da Silva, A.R., Souza, Z. M., Cerri, C. E. P., & Cherubin, M. R. (2025). Correlation of total organic C, particulate and mineral-associated C fractions with strength indicators in Oxisols. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, <i>89</i>, e70141. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70141</p><p>A funding source was inadvertently left out of the Funding Information and Acknowledgments. The Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture (CCARBON) – São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant 21/10573-4) has now been added to the Funding Information on the title page. The Acknowledgments section has also been updated to add the following sentence “We gratefully acknowledge support from the Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture (CCARBON) – São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant 21/10573-4).”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70175","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Kiemo, F. W., Singh, V., Morris, C. J., Hall, M., Shankle, M. W., & Harvey, L. M. (2025). Phosphorus fertilizer impacts on sweetpotato yield and nutrient dynamics in the soil, roots, and leaves. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, <i>89</i>, e70145. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70145</p><p>The authors have reported an error in the formula converting from pounds/acre to Mg/ha, causing the reported yields to be significantly lower than they should be. The following sentences have been updated with the correct information:</p><p>In the last sentence in the abstract, “The optimum phosphorus fertilization rate of 224 kg/ha produced 11.2 Mg/ha average total marketable root yield and should be recommended to sweetpotato growers in agroclimatic and soil conditions like Pontotoc, Mississippi” has been corrected to “The optimum phosphorus fertilization rate of 224 kg/ha produced 24.1 Mg/ha average total marketable root yield and should be recommended to sweetpotato growers in agroclimatic and soil conditions like Pontotoc, Mississippi.”</p><p>The second core idea, “Optimal phosphorus rate of 224 kg/ha yielded the highest marketable root weight of 11.2 Mg/ha,” has been corrected to “Optimal phosphorus rate of 224 kg/ha yielded the highest marketable root weight of 24.1 Mg/ha.”</p><p>In the second paragraph under “Materials and Methods” section, the sentence “Each plot consisted of two rows, each 9.1 m (30 ft) long and spaced 1.02 m (40 in) apart (on-center), resulting in a total plot area of 18.6 m<sup>2</sup> (0.0002 ha)” has been corrected to “Each plot consisted of two rows, each 9.1 m (30 ft) long and spaced 1.02 m (40 in) apart (on-center). Data was collected from only one row measuring 9.28 m<sup>2</sup> (0.00093 ha).”</p><p>In the fourth paragraph under “Yield Analysis” section, the second sentence, “According to the model, yield increased with phosphorus fertilizer amount up to an optimal rate of 224.2 kg/ha, where the maximum predicted yield was 11.2 Mg/ha” has been corrected to “According to the model, yield increased with phosphorus fertilizer amount up to an optimal rate of 224.2 kg/ha, where the maximum predicted yield was 24.1 Mg/ha.” The fourth sentence, “The model predicted a yield of 9.2 Mg/ha when no phosphorus was applied” was corrected to “The model predicted a yield of 19.7 Mg/ha when no phosphorus was applied.”</p><p>The <i>y</i>-axis scale on Figures 1, 1 and 2, 2 has been adjusted accordingly.</p><p>Figure 1 originally appeared as:</p><p>It has now been corrected to the figure below:</p><p>Figure 2 originally appeared as:</p><p>It has now been corrected to the figure below and the caption has been updated:</p><p>In the fourth paragraph under “What is the Optimum Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate?” section, the third sentence “Applying 224 kg/ha phosphorus gave the best average total marketable root weight of 11.2 Mg/ha, as confirmed by the Tukey HSD test and quadratic regression model” has been corrected to “Applying 224
Kiemo, F. W., Singh, V., Morris, C. J., Hall, M., Shankle, M. W., & Harvey, L. M.(2025)。磷肥对甘薯产量及土壤、根、叶养分动态的影响。土壤学报,29(2):444 - 444。https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70145The作者报告了从磅/英亩转换为毫克/公顷的公式中的一个错误,导致报告的产量明显低于应有的水平。摘要最后一句:“224 kg/ha的最佳施磷量可产生11.2 Mg/ha的平均总可销售根产量,应推荐给蓬托托克等农业气候和土壤条件下的甘薯种植者。“密西西比州”已更正为“最佳磷肥率为224公斤/公顷,平均总可销售根产量为24.1毫克/公顷,应推荐给密西西比州蓬托托克等农业气候和土壤条件下的甘薯种植者。”第二个核心理念“最佳施磷量为224公斤/公顷,可获得最高可售根重11.2毫克/公顷”已被修正为“最佳施磷量为224公斤/公顷,可获得最高可售根重24.1毫克/公顷”。在“材料和方法”部分的第二段中,句子“每个地块由两行组成,每一行9.1米(30英尺)长,间隔1.02米(40英寸)(中心),导致地块总面积为18.6平方米(0.0002公顷)”已被更正为“每个地块由两行组成,每一行9.1米(30英尺)长,间隔1.02米(40英寸)(中心)。”数据仅从一行9.28平方米(0.00093公顷)收集。”在“产量分析”部分第四段,将第二句“根据模型,随着磷肥用量的增加产量达到最佳产量224.2 kg/ha,最大预测产量为11.2 Mg/ha”修改为“根据模型,随着磷肥用量的增加产量达到最佳产量224.2 kg/ha,最大预测产量为24.1 Mg/ha”。第4句“模型预测不施磷时产量为9.2 Mg/ha”被修改为“模型预测不施磷时产量为19.7 Mg/ha”。图1,1和图2,2上的y轴比例已进行相应调整。图2原为:现已更正为下图,并更新了标题:在“最佳磷肥用量是多少?”部分的第四段中,第三句“施用224公斤/公顷磷肥的最佳平均总可售根重为11.2毫克/公顷”。“经Tukey HSD试验和二次回归模型证实,施磷224 kg/ha的平均总可售根重最佳,为24.1 Mg/ha,经Tukey HSD试验和二次回归模型证实。”在“结论”部分的第一段中,第二句“这项为期三年的研究(2022-2024)确定224公斤/公顷磷肥导致最高的市场红薯产量为11.2毫克/公顷”已被更正为“这项为期三年的研究(2022-2024)确定224公斤/公顷磷肥导致最高的市场红薯产量为24.1毫克/公顷。”我们为这些错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Phosphorus fertilizer impacts on sweetpotato yield and nutrient dynamics in the soil, roots, and leaves”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70171","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kiemo, F. W., Singh, V., Morris, C. J., Hall, M., Shankle, M. W., & Harvey, L. M. (2025). Phosphorus fertilizer impacts on sweetpotato yield and nutrient dynamics in the soil, roots, and leaves. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, <i>89</i>, e70145. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70145</p><p>The authors have reported an error in the formula converting from pounds/acre to Mg/ha, causing the reported yields to be significantly lower than they should be. The following sentences have been updated with the correct information:</p><p>In the last sentence in the abstract, “The optimum phosphorus fertilization rate of 224 kg/ha produced 11.2 Mg/ha average total marketable root yield and should be recommended to sweetpotato growers in agroclimatic and soil conditions like Pontotoc, Mississippi” has been corrected to “The optimum phosphorus fertilization rate of 224 kg/ha produced 24.1 Mg/ha average total marketable root yield and should be recommended to sweetpotato growers in agroclimatic and soil conditions like Pontotoc, Mississippi.”</p><p>The second core idea, “Optimal phosphorus rate of 224 kg/ha yielded the highest marketable root weight of 11.2 Mg/ha,” has been corrected to “Optimal phosphorus rate of 224 kg/ha yielded the highest marketable root weight of 24.1 Mg/ha.”</p><p>In the second paragraph under “Materials and Methods” section, the sentence “Each plot consisted of two rows, each 9.1 m (30 ft) long and spaced 1.02 m (40 in) apart (on-center), resulting in a total plot area of 18.6 m<sup>2</sup> (0.0002 ha)” has been corrected to “Each plot consisted of two rows, each 9.1 m (30 ft) long and spaced 1.02 m (40 in) apart (on-center). Data was collected from only one row measuring 9.28 m<sup>2</sup> (0.00093 ha).”</p><p>In the fourth paragraph under “Yield Analysis” section, the second sentence, “According to the model, yield increased with phosphorus fertilizer amount up to an optimal rate of 224.2 kg/ha, where the maximum predicted yield was 11.2 Mg/ha” has been corrected to “According to the model, yield increased with phosphorus fertilizer amount up to an optimal rate of 224.2 kg/ha, where the maximum predicted yield was 24.1 Mg/ha.” The fourth sentence, “The model predicted a yield of 9.2 Mg/ha when no phosphorus was applied” was corrected to “The model predicted a yield of 19.7 Mg/ha when no phosphorus was applied.”</p><p>The <i>y</i>-axis scale on Figures 1, 1 and 2, 2 has been adjusted accordingly.</p><p>Figure 1 originally appeared as:</p><p>It has now been corrected to the figure below:</p><p>Figure 2 originally appeared as:</p><p>It has now been corrected to the figure below and the caption has been updated:</p><p>In the fourth paragraph under “What is the Optimum Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate?” section, the third sentence “Applying 224 kg/ha phosphorus gave the best average total marketable root weight of 11.2 Mg/ha, as confirmed by the Tukey HSD test and quadratic regression model” has been corrected to “Applying 224 ","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70171","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Roel-Rezk, V., Horwath, W. R., & Pittelkow, C. M. (2025). Is soil health research meeting its potential? Analysis of studies in California and implications for ecosystem services. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89, e70139. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70139
Data presented in the left panel of Figure 1, 1 is incorrect and does not match the correct data mentioned in the text. The total numbers should have been 22 articles (updated from 17) measured in the three dimensions and represent 51% of the papers (updated from 52%). Four articles measure a biological and a chemical indicator (updated from 2), and five only a chemical indicator (updated from 2).
The original figure is provided below:
The corrected figure with the corrected numbers appears below:
We apologize for this error.
Roel-Rezk, V., Horwath, W. R., &; Pittelkow, c.m.(2025)。土壤健康研究是否发挥了它的潜力?加州研究分析及其对生态系统服务的影响。水土保持学报,2009,33(2):444 - 444。图1左面板中显示的https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70139Data, 1是不正确的,与文本中提到的正确数据不匹配。在三维测量中,总数应该是22篇文章(从17篇更新),占论文的51%(从52%更新)。四篇文章测量生物和化学指标(从2更新),五篇文章仅测量化学指标(从2更新)。原图如下:更正后的数字如下:我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Is soil health research meeting its potential? Analysis of studies in California and implications for ecosystem services”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70173","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roel-Rezk, V., Horwath, W. R., & Pittelkow, C. M. (2025). Is soil health research meeting its potential? Analysis of studies in California and implications for ecosystem services. <i>Soil Science Society of America Journal</i>, <i>89</i>, e70139. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70139</p><p>Data presented in the left panel of Figure 1, 1 is incorrect and does not match the correct data mentioned in the text. The total numbers should have been 22 articles (updated from 17) measured in the three dimensions and represent 51% of the papers (updated from 52%). Four articles measure a biological and a chemical indicator (updated from 2), and five only a chemical indicator (updated from 2).</p><p>The original figure is provided below:</p><p>The corrected figure with the corrected numbers appears below:</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70173","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emmanuel C. Omondi, Atanu Mukherjee, Jay B. Norton, Dennis S. Ashilenje, Urszula Norton, John Beeby, Walter O. Chiwo
Soil health underpins ecosystem services and sustainable agriculture. This study compared soil health properties among three long-term land-use systems in Trans Nzoia, western Kenya: biointensive agriculture (BIA), natural shrubland reserve, and conventional maize monocropping. Soil health was assessed primarily through chemical and biological indicators, with bulk density (BD) included as the measured physical property. Soil texture was also determined across sites, providing context as an inherent and potentially management-influenced property. Soil samples (from 0- to 5-cm, 5- to 15-cm, 15- to 30-cm, 30- to 60-cm, and 60- to 100-cm depths) were analyzed for microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (MBC), dissolved organic C, total dissolved N (TDN), potential mineralizable C and N, total N (TN), total C (TC), TN stocks, TC stocks, bulk density, and soil texture. Several soil health indicators were higher in BIA and shrubland than in maize, especially at 0–5 cm. At this depth, MBC (BIA vs. maize: +117%) and TDN (nature reserve vs. maize: +141%) were greater. TC (BIA vs. maize: +69%) and TN (shrubland vs. maize: +58%) stocks were also higher. BIA had the lowest BD (1.07 g cm−3 at 0–5 cm) compared to maize (1.27 g cm−3), consistent with better aeration and root penetration. While recognizing that observed differences reflect the combined influence of management history and inherent site properties, these case comparisons suggest that BIA management is associated with higher C and N stocks, enhanced microbial biomass, and reduced compaction. Adopting BIA could help mitigate soil degradation and support agricultural sustainability in smallholder systems.
土壤健康是生态系统服务和可持续农业的基础。这项研究比较了肯尼亚西部Trans Nzoia三种长期土地利用系统的土壤健康特性:生物集约化农业(BIA)、天然灌木保护区和传统玉米单作。土壤健康主要通过化学和生物指标进行评估,并将容重(BD)作为测量的物理性质。还确定了不同地点的土壤质地,提供了作为固有和潜在管理影响属性的背景。分析土壤样品(0 ~ 5cm、5 ~ 15cm、15 ~ 30cm、30 ~ 60cm和60 ~ 100cm深度)微生物生物量碳氮(MBC)、溶解有机碳、总溶解氮(TDN)、潜在矿化C和N、全N (TN)、总C (TC)、TN存量、TC存量、容重和土壤质地。BIA和灌丛地土壤健康指标均高于玉米,特别是0 ~ 5 cm土壤。在该深度,MBC (BIA比玉米+117%)和TDN(自然保护区比玉米+141%)较大。TC (BIA vs.玉米:+69%)和TN(灌丛vs.玉米:+58%)储量也较高。与玉米(1.27 g cm - 3)相比,BIA在0-5 cm处的BD最低(1.07 g cm - 3),这与较好的通气和根系穿透性一致。虽然认识到观察到的差异反映了管理历史和固有场地特性的综合影响,但这些案例比较表明,BIA管理与更高的碳和氮储量、增强的微生物生物量和减少的压实有关。采用BIA有助于缓解土壤退化,支持小农系统的农业可持续性。
{"title":"Comparisons of soil health properties among three long-term land-use systems in Trans Nzoia, Kenya","authors":"Emmanuel C. Omondi, Atanu Mukherjee, Jay B. Norton, Dennis S. Ashilenje, Urszula Norton, John Beeby, Walter O. Chiwo","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70167","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil health underpins ecosystem services and sustainable agriculture. This study compared soil health properties among three long-term land-use systems in Trans Nzoia, western Kenya: biointensive agriculture (BIA), natural shrubland reserve, and conventional maize monocropping. Soil health was assessed primarily through chemical and biological indicators, with bulk density (BD) included as the measured physical property. Soil texture was also determined across sites, providing context as an inherent and potentially management-influenced property. Soil samples (from 0- to 5-cm, 5- to 15-cm, 15- to 30-cm, 30- to 60-cm, and 60- to 100-cm depths) were analyzed for microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (MBC), dissolved organic C, total dissolved N (TDN), potential mineralizable C and N, total N (TN), total C (TC), TN stocks, TC stocks, bulk density, and soil texture. Several soil health indicators were higher in BIA and shrubland than in maize, especially at 0–5 cm. At this depth, MBC (BIA vs. maize: +117%) and TDN (nature reserve vs. maize: +141%) were greater. TC (BIA vs. maize: +69%) and TN (shrubland vs. maize: +58%) stocks were also higher. BIA had the lowest BD (1.07 g cm<sup>−3</sup> at 0–5 cm) compared to maize (1.27 g cm<sup>−3</sup>), consistent with better aeration and root penetration. While recognizing that observed differences reflect the combined influence of management history and inherent site properties, these case comparisons suggest that BIA management is associated with higher C and N stocks, enhanced microbial biomass, and reduced compaction. Adopting BIA could help mitigate soil degradation and support agricultural sustainability in smallholder systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madhav Dhakal, Martin A. Locke, Krishna N. Reddy, Matthew T. Moore, R. Wade Steinriede Jr., Tulsi P. Kharel, L. Jason Krutz
Tillage and cover cropping are known to affect soil water dynamics and crop evapotranspiration (ET), and consequently, water footprint (WF) of crop production and economic return. In this study, two tillage practices (conventional tillage [CT] and no-tillage [NT]) and cover crop (CC) treatments (Austrian winter pea [Pisum sativum] CC and no-CC [NC]) were investigated to quantify soil water balance, ET, and WF of yield and revenue for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) production. Soil volumetric water content was measured from 0- to 120-cm depth from May to October in 2020 and 2021. Runoff, deep percolation, and ET were modeled using the root zone water quality model (RZWQM2), and WF was determined as m3 of water consumed per kg of yield or unit revenue. The RZWQM2 performance was acceptable, validated by low residual errors. Pooled across years, CT treatments depleted soil water storage by 9% and 7% over the season in cotton and sorghum, respectively, which was 6% and 7% for NT. No-till reduced the runoff by 31% over CT when averaged across years and cash crops. The NTCC (no-tillage, cover crop) minimized ET, compared to NTNC (no-tillage, no cover crop) and CT treatments, particularly in sorghum. Tillage increased the WF of yield and revenue for cotton by 7% and 6% over NT treatments, respectively. In sorghum, neither tillage nor cover cropping altered the WF outcomes. Overall, cover cropping and conservation tillage could be used to complement each other to minimize the WF of cotton and sorghum production in the humid Lower Mississippi River Basin.
{"title":"Soil–plant–water relations and water footprint of cover crop–based no-till cotton and sorghum systems in a humid region","authors":"Madhav Dhakal, Martin A. Locke, Krishna N. Reddy, Matthew T. Moore, R. Wade Steinriede Jr., Tulsi P. Kharel, L. Jason Krutz","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70166","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tillage and cover cropping are known to affect soil water dynamics and crop evapotranspiration (ET), and consequently, water footprint (WF) of crop production and economic return. In this study, two tillage practices (conventional tillage [CT] and no-tillage [NT]) and cover crop (CC) treatments (Austrian winter pea [<i>Pisum sativum</i>] CC and no-CC [NC]) were investigated to quantify soil water balance, ET, and WF of yield and revenue for cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i>) and sorghum (<i>Sorghum bicolor</i>) production. Soil volumetric water content was measured from 0- to 120-cm depth from May to October in 2020 and 2021. Runoff, deep percolation, and ET were modeled using the root zone water quality model (RZWQM2), and WF was determined as m<sup>3</sup> of water consumed per kg of yield or unit revenue. The RZWQM2 performance was acceptable, validated by low residual errors. Pooled across years, CT treatments depleted soil water storage by 9% and 7% over the season in cotton and sorghum, respectively, which was 6% and 7% for NT. No-till reduced the runoff by 31% over CT when averaged across years and cash crops. The NTCC (no-tillage, cover crop) minimized ET, compared to NTNC (no-tillage, no cover crop) and CT treatments, particularly in sorghum. Tillage increased the WF of yield and revenue for cotton by 7% and 6% over NT treatments, respectively. In sorghum, neither tillage nor cover cropping altered the WF outcomes. Overall, cover cropping and conservation tillage could be used to complement each other to minimize the WF of cotton and sorghum production in the humid Lower Mississippi River Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70166","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145625913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil structure is an important feature that facilitates water infiltration, storage, and transport into the profile, as well as affecting soil organic matter storage, habitat for soil organisms, and nutrient cycling. How land use and grassland management affect soil structural characteristics in the warm, humid region of the southeastern US remains poorly described. A cross-sectional study from 308 grassland fields and 29 woodlots was sampled at 0- to 10-cm depth in North Carolina. Soils were mostly Ultisols (90%) and included some Alfisols, Inceptisols, and Entisols. Soil texture classes included sand (6%), loamy sand (7%), sandy loam (21%), sandy clay loam (27%), loam (17%), clay loam (13%), silt loam (7%), and silty clay loam (1%). Overall, soil bulk density was greater under grassland than under woodland (1.26 vs. 1.06 Mg m−3, respectively) but the difference narrowed with finer soil texture. Mean-weight diameter of water-stable aggregation was greater under grassland than under woodland in fine-textured soils but not in other soils. Soil stability index was not different between grassland and woodland, possibly due to high levels (>90%) in both land uses. Several grassland management factors influenced soil structural characteristics, including prior land-use history, pasture age, stocking density, and forage utilization. Soil structural characteristics were strongly negatively associated with sand concentration and positively associated with soil-test biological activity. Older pastures with moderate grazing pressure exhibited the strongest soil structural characteristics on medium- and fine-textured soils, thereby delivering vital ecosystem services from this widely prevalent land use in the eastern United States.
{"title":"Soil structural characteristics affected by grassland management and land use along a soil texture gradient in North Carolina","authors":"Alan J. Franzluebbers","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70168","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil structure is an important feature that facilitates water infiltration, storage, and transport into the profile, as well as affecting soil organic matter storage, habitat for soil organisms, and nutrient cycling. How land use and grassland management affect soil structural characteristics in the warm, humid region of the southeastern US remains poorly described. A cross-sectional study from 308 grassland fields and 29 woodlots was sampled at 0- to 10-cm depth in North Carolina. Soils were mostly Ultisols (90%) and included some Alfisols, Inceptisols, and Entisols. Soil texture classes included sand (6%), loamy sand (7%), sandy loam (21%), sandy clay loam (27%), loam (17%), clay loam (13%), silt loam (7%), and silty clay loam (1%). Overall, soil bulk density was greater under grassland than under woodland (1.26 vs. 1.06 Mg m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively) but the difference narrowed with finer soil texture. Mean-weight diameter of water-stable aggregation was greater under grassland than under woodland in fine-textured soils but not in other soils. Soil stability index was not different between grassland and woodland, possibly due to high levels (>90%) in both land uses. Several grassland management factors influenced soil structural characteristics, including prior land-use history, pasture age, stocking density, and forage utilization. Soil structural characteristics were strongly negatively associated with sand concentration and positively associated with soil-test biological activity. Older pastures with moderate grazing pressure exhibited the strongest soil structural characteristics on medium- and fine-textured soils, thereby delivering vital ecosystem services from this widely prevalent land use in the eastern United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70168","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) has great agricultural potential due to its water-retention ability, but its effects at different application amounts on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity and soil properties remain unclear. In this study, γ-PGA was applied at five amounts (0, 10, 20, 40, and 80 kg ha−1, denoted as CK, T10, T20, T40, and T80, respectively) via drip irrigation to soybean plants to evaluate its impact on soil physical and hydraulic properties, nutrient availability, crop growth, and yield. The results showed that γ-PGA application increased soil porosity, reduced bulk density, and improved soil temperature in the 0–25 cm layer. Soil hydraulic parameters, including field capacity and plant-available water, also improved with γ-PGA application. However, γ-PGA application reduced soil nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels at harvest. Nutrient uptake efficiency and soybean growth initially increased and then declined with higher γ-PGA application amounts, with the highest yield observed under the T40 treatment. Overall, applying γ-PGA at 40 kg ha−1 effectively enhanced soil properties and nutrient uptake, leading to improved soybean productivity.
聚γ-谷氨酸(γ-PGA)具有良好的保水性,具有很大的农业应用潜力,但不同施用量对大豆的影响[j]。稳定。生产力和土壤性质仍不清楚。本研究采用滴灌方式,分别以CK、T10、T20、T40和T80 5个剂量(0、10、20、40和80 kg ha−1)施用γ-PGA,评价其对大豆土壤物理和水力特性、养分有效性、作物生长和产量的影响。结果表明,γ-PGA的施用增加了0 ~ 25 cm土层的孔隙度,降低了容重,改善了土壤温度。γ-PGA的施用也改善了土壤水力学参数,包括田间容量和植物有效水分。然而,γ-PGA的施用降低了收获期土壤氮、磷和钾的水平。随着γ-PGA施用量的增加,养分吸收效率和大豆生长先上升后下降,以T40处理产量最高。总体而言,施用40 kg ha - 1 γ-PGA可有效改善土壤性质和养分吸收,从而提高大豆产量。
{"title":"Poly-γ-glutamic acid application promoted nutrient uptake and productivity of soybean by improving soil properties","authors":"Bo Jing, Wenjuan Shi, Jiaping Liang","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70164","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) has great agricultural potential due to its water-retention ability, but its effects at different application amounts on soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] productivity and soil properties remain unclear. In this study, γ-PGA was applied at five amounts (0, 10, 20, 40, and 80 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, denoted as CK, T10, T20, T40, and T80, respectively) via drip irrigation to soybean plants to evaluate its impact on soil physical and hydraulic properties, nutrient availability, crop growth, and yield. The results showed that γ-PGA application increased soil porosity, reduced bulk density, and improved soil temperature in the 0–25 cm layer. Soil hydraulic parameters, including field capacity and plant-available water, also improved with γ-PGA application. However, γ-PGA application reduced soil nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels at harvest. Nutrient uptake efficiency and soybean growth initially increased and then declined with higher γ-PGA application amounts, with the highest yield observed under the T40 treatment. Overall, applying γ-PGA at 40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> effectively enhanced soil properties and nutrient uptake, leading to improved soybean productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145625984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}