Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-11DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.002
Yixing Wang , Qingrui Yue , Xinzheng Lu , Donglian Gu , Zhen Xu , Yuan Tian , Shen Zhang
Construction of disaster-resilient cities has attracted considerable attention. However, traditional methods of studying urban disaster resilience through experimental approaches are often constrained by various limitations, such as testing sites, costs and ethical considerations. To address these constraints, this paper proposes incorporating digital twin concepts into urban disaster resilience research. By establishing a connection between the physical realm of the city and its virtual counterpart, this approach utilizes digital simulations to overcome the limitations of experimental methods and enables dynamic deduction and control of the disaster process. This paper delves into three key aspects encompassing the acquisition of data from reality to the virtual space, disaster simulation within the virtual space, and translation of virtual insights into effective disaster prevention strategies in reality. It provides a comprehensive summary of relevant research endeavors from the authors’ research group and showcases the effectiveness and potential of the proposed techniques. These findings serve as references for pre-disaster planning, real-time emergency assessments, post-disaster rescue operations, and accident investigations for buildings and cities.
{"title":"Digital twin approach for enhancing urban resilience: A cycle between virtual space and the real world","authors":"Yixing Wang , Qingrui Yue , Xinzheng Lu , Donglian Gu , Zhen Xu , Yuan Tian , Shen Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Construction of disaster-resilient cities has attracted considerable attention. However, traditional methods of studying urban disaster resilience through experimental approaches are often constrained by various limitations, such as testing sites, costs and ethical considerations. To address these constraints, this paper proposes incorporating digital twin concepts into urban disaster resilience research. By establishing a connection between the physical realm of the city and its virtual counterpart, this approach utilizes digital simulations to overcome the limitations of experimental methods and enables dynamic deduction and control of the disaster process. This paper delves into three key aspects encompassing the acquisition of data from reality to the virtual space, disaster simulation within the virtual space, and translation of virtual insights into effective disaster prevention strategies in reality. It provides a comprehensive summary of relevant research endeavors from the authors’ research group and showcases the effectiveness and potential of the proposed techniques. These findings serve as references for pre-disaster planning, real-time emergency assessments, post-disaster rescue operations, and accident investigations for buildings and cities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 34-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000231/pdfft?md5=acb5c8dda347acc12345c08ef6843bfe&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000231-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141303353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.004
Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary , Thomas Gernay , Ruben Van Coile
Adequacy of structural fire design in uncommon structures is conceptually ensured through cost-benefit analysis where the future costs are balanced against the benefits of safety investment. Cost-benefit analyses, however, are complicated and computationally challenging, and hence impractical for application to individual projects. To address this issue, design guidance proposes target reliability indices for normal design conditions, but no target reliability indices are defined for structural fire design. We revisit the background of the cost-optimization based approach underlying normal design target reliability indices then we extend this approach for the case of fire design of structures. We also propose a modified objective function for cost-optimization which simplifies the evaluation of target reliability indices and reduces the number of assumptions. The optimum safety level is expressed as a function of a new dimensionless variable named “Damage-to-investment indicator” (DII). The cost optimization approach is validated for the target reliability indices for normal design condition. The method is then applied for evaluating DII and the associated optimum reliability indices for fire-exposed structures. Two case studies are presented: (i) a one-way loaded reinforced concrete slab and (ii) a steel column under axial loading. This study thus provides a framework for deriving optimum (target) reliability index for structural fire design which can support the development of rational provisions in codes and standards.
从概念上讲,通过成本效益分析来确保非普通结构的结构防火设计的充分性,在成本效益分析中,未来的成本与安全投资的效益是相互平衡的。然而,成本效益分析非常复杂,在计算上具有挑战性,因此应用于单个项目是不切实际的。为了解决这个问题,设计指南提出了正常设计条件下的目标可靠性指数,但没有为结构防火设计定义目标可靠性指数。我们重温了基于成本优化方法的正常设计目标可靠性指数的背景,然后将这种方法扩展到结构防火设计中。我们还提出了成本优化的修正目标函数,它简化了目标可靠性指数的评估,减少了假设的数量。最佳安全等级用一个名为 "损失-投资指标"(DII)的新无量纲变量的函数来表示。成本优化方法对正常设计条件下的目标可靠性指数进行了验证。然后将该方法应用于评估 DII 和火灾暴露结构的相关最佳可靠性指数。本文介绍了两个案例研究:(i) 单向加载的钢筋混凝土板和 (ii) 轴向加载的钢柱。因此,本研究为推导结构防火设计的最佳(目标)可靠性指数提供了一个框架,可为制定规范和标准中的合理条款提供支持。
{"title":"Cost-optimization based target reliabilities for design of structures exposed to fire","authors":"Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary , Thomas Gernay , Ruben Van Coile","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adequacy of structural fire design in uncommon structures is conceptually ensured through cost-benefit analysis where the future costs are balanced against the benefits of safety investment. Cost-benefit analyses, however, are complicated and computationally challenging, and hence impractical for application to individual projects. To address this issue, design guidance proposes target reliability indices for normal design conditions, but no target reliability indices are defined for structural fire design. We revisit the background of the cost-optimization based approach underlying normal design target reliability indices then we extend this approach for the case of fire design of structures. We also propose a modified objective function for cost-optimization which simplifies the evaluation of target reliability indices and reduces the number of assumptions. The optimum safety level is expressed as a function of a new dimensionless variable named “Damage-to-investment indicator” (<em>DII</em>). The cost optimization approach is validated for the target reliability indices for normal design condition. The method is then applied for evaluating <em>DII</em> and the associated optimum reliability indices for fire-exposed structures. Two case studies are presented: (i) a one-way loaded reinforced concrete slab and (ii) a steel column under axial loading. This study thus provides a framework for deriving optimum (target) reliability index for structural fire design which can support the development of rational provisions in codes and standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 20-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000073/pdfft?md5=8c93ba8b1c17594c2da41aa96012b1d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000073-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140339775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-22DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.001
Jingran Sun , Kyle Bathgate , Zhanmin Zhang
Critical infrastructure systems (CISs) play a key role in the socio-economic activity of a society, but are exposed to an array of disruptive events that can greatly impact their function and performance. Therefore, understanding the underlying behaviors of CISs and their response to perturbations is needed to better prepare for, and mitigate the impact of, future disruptions. Resilience is one characteristic of CISs that influences the extent and severity of the impact induced by extreme events. Resilience is often dissected into four dimensions: robustness, redundancy, resourcefulness, and rapidity, known as the “4Rs”. This study proposes a framework to assess the resilience of an infrastructure network in terms of these four dimensions under optimal resource allocation strategies and incorporates interdependencies between different CISs, with resilience considered as a stochastic variable. The proposed framework combines an agent-based infrastructure interdependency model, advanced optimization algorithms, Bayesian network techniques, and Monte Carlo simulation to assess the resilience of an infrastructure network. The applicability and flexibility of the proposed framework is demonstrated with a case study using a network of CISs in Austin, Texas, where the resilience of the network is assessed and a “what-if” analysis is performed.
{"title":"Bayesian network-based resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems under optimal resource allocation strategies","authors":"Jingran Sun , Kyle Bathgate , Zhanmin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Critical infrastructure systems (CISs) play a key role in the socio-economic activity of a society, but are exposed to an array of disruptive events that can greatly impact their function and performance. Therefore, understanding the underlying behaviors of CISs and their response to perturbations is needed to better prepare for, and mitigate the impact of, future disruptions. Resilience is one characteristic of CISs that influences the extent and severity of the impact induced by extreme events. Resilience is often dissected into four dimensions: robustness, redundancy, resourcefulness, and rapidity, known as the “4Rs”. This study proposes a framework to assess the resilience of an infrastructure network in terms of these four dimensions under optimal resource allocation strategies and incorporates interdependencies between different CISs, with resilience considered as a stochastic variable. The proposed framework combines an agent-based infrastructure interdependency model, advanced optimization algorithms, Bayesian network techniques, and Monte Carlo simulation to assess the resilience of an infrastructure network. The applicability and flexibility of the proposed framework is demonstrated with a case study using a network of CISs in Austin, Texas, where the resilience of the network is assessed and a “what-if” analysis is performed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 46-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000243/pdfft?md5=24619a7f8da93c2785ae149da66b3b9e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000243-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141444203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.08.001
Alice Alipour , Gian Paolo Cimellaro , Xinzheng Lu
{"title":"Editorial: From performance-based engineering to cityscape resilience","authors":"Alice Alipour , Gian Paolo Cimellaro , Xinzheng Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages A1-A2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000395/pdfft?md5=eff6ede1fee6c6d0c14d7a273686caff&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000395-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142098959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-07-21DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.003
Milad Roohi , Saeid Ghasemi , Omar Sediek , Hwayoung Jeon , John W. van de Lindt , Martin Shields , Sara Hamideh , Harvey Cutler
The multi-disciplinary data and information available at a community level comprise the foundation of natural hazard resilience modeling. These data enable and inform mitigation and recovery planning decisions prior to and following damaging events such as earthquakes. This paper presents a multi-disciplinary seismic resilience modeling methodology to assess the vulnerability of the built environment and economic systems. This methodology can assist decision-makers with developing effective mitigation policies to improve the seismic resilience of communities. Two complementary modeling strategies are designed to examine the impacts of scenario earthquakes from a combined engineering and economic perspective. The engineering model is developed using a probabilistic fragility-based modeling approach and is analyzed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations subject to seismic multi-hazard, including simulated ground shaking and resulting liquefaction of the soil, to quantify the physical damage to buildings and electric power substations (EPS). The outcome of the analysis is subsequently used as input to repair and recovery models to quantify repair cost and recovery time metrics for buildings and as input to functionality models to estimate the functionality of individual buildings and substations by accounting for their interdependency. The economic model consists of a spatial computable general equilibrium (SCGE) model that aggregates commercial buildings into sectors for retail, manufacturing, services, etc., and aggregates residential buildings into a wide range of household groups. The SCGE model employs building functionality estimates to quantify the economic losses. The outcomes of this integrated modeling consist of engineering and economic impact metrics, which are used to investigate mitigation actions to help inform a community on approaches to achieve its resilience goals. An illustrative case study of Salt Lake County (SLC), Utah, developed through an extensive collaborative partnership and engagement with SLC officials, is presented. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in quantifying the loss and functional recovery of infrastructure systems, the impacts on capital stock, employment, and household income and the effect of various mitigation strategies in reducing the losses and functional recovery time subject to earthquakes with varying intensities.
{"title":"Multi-disciplinary seismic resilience modeling for developing mitigation policies and recovery planning","authors":"Milad Roohi , Saeid Ghasemi , Omar Sediek , Hwayoung Jeon , John W. van de Lindt , Martin Shields , Sara Hamideh , Harvey Cutler","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The multi-disciplinary data and information available at a community level comprise the foundation of natural hazard resilience modeling. These data enable and inform mitigation and recovery planning decisions prior to and following damaging events such as earthquakes. This paper presents a multi-disciplinary seismic resilience modeling methodology to assess the vulnerability of the built environment and economic systems. This methodology can assist decision-makers with developing effective mitigation policies to improve the seismic resilience of communities. Two complementary modeling strategies are designed to examine the impacts of scenario earthquakes from a combined engineering and economic perspective. The <em>engineering model</em> is developed using a probabilistic fragility-based modeling approach and is analyzed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations subject to seismic multi-hazard, including simulated ground shaking and resulting liquefaction of the soil, to quantify the physical damage to buildings and electric power substations (EPS). The outcome of the analysis is subsequently used as input to repair and recovery models to quantify repair cost and recovery time metrics for buildings and as input to functionality models to estimate the functionality of individual buildings and substations by accounting for their interdependency. The <em>economic model</em> consists of a spatial computable general equilibrium (SCGE) model that aggregates commercial buildings into sectors for retail, manufacturing, services, etc., and aggregates residential buildings into a wide range of household groups. The SCGE model employs building functionality estimates to quantify the economic losses. The outcomes of this integrated modeling consist of engineering and economic impact metrics, which are used to investigate mitigation actions to help inform a community on approaches to achieve its resilience goals. An illustrative case study of Salt Lake County (SLC), Utah, developed through an extensive collaborative partnership and engagement with SLC officials, is presented. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in quantifying the loss and functional recovery of infrastructure systems, the impacts on capital stock, employment, and household income and the effect of various mitigation strategies in reducing the losses and functional recovery time subject to earthquakes with varying intensities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 66-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000309/pdfft?md5=5423f887d8555c5cc2342ad610d67cd6&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000309-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141736685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-26DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.003
Xu Han , Maria Koliou
A large number of communities are impacted annually by the increasing frequency of tornado hazards resulting in damage to the infrastructure as well as disruption of community functions. The effect of the hazard geometry (center and angle of tornado path as well as the tornado width) is studied herein on how it influences the recovery of physical and social systems within the community. Given that pre-disaster preparedness including mitigation strategies (e.g., retrofits) and policies (e.g., insurance) is crucial for increasing the resilience of the community and facilitating a faster recovery process, in this study, the impact of various mitigation strategies and policies on the recovery trajectory and resilience of a typical US community subjected to a tornado is investigated considering different sources of uncertainties. The virtual testbed of Centerville is selected in this paper and is modeled by adopting the Agent-based modeling (ABM) approach which is a powerful tool for conducting community resilience analysis that simulates the behavior of different types of agents and their interactions to capture their interdependencies. The results are presented in the form of recovery time series as well as calculated resilience indices for various community systems (lifeline networks, schools, healthcare, businesses, and households). The results of this study can help deepen our understanding of how to efficiently expedite the recovery process of a community.
{"title":"Investigation of effects of hazard geometry and mitigation strategies on community resilience under tornado hazards using an Agent-based modeling approach","authors":"Xu Han , Maria Koliou","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A large number of communities are impacted annually by the increasing frequency of tornado hazards resulting in damage to the infrastructure as well as disruption of community functions. The effect of the hazard geometry (center and angle of tornado path as well as the tornado width) is studied herein on how it influences the recovery of physical and social systems within the community. Given that pre-disaster preparedness including mitigation strategies (e.g., retrofits) and policies (e.g., insurance) is crucial for increasing the resilience of the community and facilitating a faster recovery process, in this study, the impact of various mitigation strategies and policies on the recovery trajectory and resilience of a typical US community subjected to a tornado is investigated considering different sources of uncertainties. The virtual testbed of Centerville is selected in this paper and is modeled by adopting the Agent-based modeling (ABM) approach which is a powerful tool for conducting community resilience analysis that simulates the behavior of different types of agents and their interactions to capture their interdependencies. The results are presented in the form of recovery time series as well as calculated resilience indices for various community systems (lifeline networks, schools, healthcare, businesses, and households). The results of this study can help deepen our understanding of how to efficiently expedite the recovery process of a community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000061/pdfft?md5=388d219140ec9b89a5f251b325989c5b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000061-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140290824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-07-27DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.006
Mojtaba Harati, John W. van de Lindt
This study introduces an advanced community-level resilience analysis methodology integrating 3D fragility surfaces for combined successive earthquake-tsunami hazard and analysis. The methodology facilitates comprehensive evaluations of spatial damage, economic loss, and risk under multi-hazard conditions. This study compares earthquake-only analysis results to the successive earthquake-tsunami analysis at the community level to reveal – and quantify - significant disparities in damage and loss estimations between the analyses, emphasizing the need to consider both hazards in community planning even at lower seismic intensities. Critical assessment of the FEMA combinational rule demonstrates its limitations in accurately predicting losses and damage patterns at higher hazard intensities, highlighting the necessity for refined models that accurately account for hazard interactions. This research advances multi-hazard community-level resilience analysis by offering a robust framework for earthquake and tsunami assessment, underscoring the need for integration of detailed multi-hazard analyses into resilience planning. Finally, it suggests future directions for enhancing framework applicability across diverse community settings and structural types, aiming to improve community resilience.
{"title":"Community-Level resilience analysis using earthquake-tsunami fragility surfaces","authors":"Mojtaba Harati, John W. van de Lindt","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces an advanced community-level resilience analysis methodology integrating 3D fragility surfaces for combined successive earthquake-tsunami hazard and analysis. The methodology facilitates comprehensive evaluations of spatial damage, economic loss, and risk under multi-hazard conditions. This study compares earthquake-only analysis results to the successive earthquake-tsunami analysis at the community level to reveal – and quantify - significant disparities in damage and loss estimations between the analyses, emphasizing the need to consider both hazards in community planning even at lower seismic intensities. Critical assessment of the FEMA combinational rule demonstrates its limitations in accurately predicting losses and damage patterns at higher hazard intensities, highlighting the necessity for refined models that accurately account for hazard interactions. This research advances multi-hazard community-level resilience analysis by offering a robust framework for earthquake and tsunami assessment, underscoring the need for integration of detailed multi-hazard analyses into resilience planning. Finally, it suggests future directions for enhancing framework applicability across diverse community settings and structural types, aiming to improve community resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 101-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000334/pdfft?md5=c5c8f82051b494f00d6ddd67f71b3cf6&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000334-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141950528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.002
Jesika Rahman, Vahid Aghaeidoost, AHM Muntasir Billah
Records of wave-induced damage on coastal bridges during natural hazards have been well documented over the past two decades. It is of utmost importance to decipher the loading mechanism and enhance the resilience of coastal bridges during extreme wave-inducing events. Quantification of vulnerability of these structures is an essential step in designing a resilient bridge system. Recently, considerable efforts have been made to study the force applied and the response of coastal bridge systems during extreme wave loading conditions. Although remarkable progress can be found in the quantification of load and response of coastal superstructures, very few studies assessed coastal bridge resiliency against extreme wave-induced loads. This paper adopts a simplified and practical technique to analyze and assess the resilience of coastal bridges exposed to extreme waves. Component-level and system-level fragility analyses form the basis of the resiliency analysis where the recovery functions are adopted based on the damage levels. It is shown that wave period has the highest contribution to the variation of bridge resiliency. Moreover, this study presents the uncertainty quantification in resiliency variation due to changes in wave load intensity. Results show that the bridge resiliency becomes more uncertain as the intensity of wave parameters increases. Finally, possible restoration strategies based on the desired resilience level and the attitude of decision-makers are also discussed.
{"title":"Resilience of coastal bridges under extreme wave-induced loads","authors":"Jesika Rahman, Vahid Aghaeidoost, AHM Muntasir Billah","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Records of wave-induced damage on coastal bridges during natural hazards have been well documented over the past two decades. It is of utmost importance to decipher the loading mechanism and enhance the resilience of coastal bridges during extreme wave-inducing events. Quantification of vulnerability of these structures is an essential step in designing a resilient bridge system. Recently, considerable efforts have been made to study the force applied and the response of coastal bridge systems during extreme wave loading conditions. Although remarkable progress can be found in the quantification of load and response of coastal superstructures, very few studies assessed coastal bridge resiliency against extreme wave-induced loads. This paper adopts a simplified and practical technique to analyze and assess the resilience of coastal bridges exposed to extreme waves. Component-level and system-level fragility analyses form the basis of the resiliency analysis where the recovery functions are adopted based on the damage levels. It is shown that wave period has the highest contribution to the variation of bridge resiliency. Moreover, this study presents the uncertainty quantification in resiliency variation due to changes in wave load intensity. Results show that the bridge resiliency becomes more uncertain as the intensity of wave parameters increases. Finally, possible restoration strategies based on the desired resilience level and the attitude of decision-makers are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 85-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000292/pdfft?md5=1256cf731cf632a79d7b8c5c9a9a2540&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000292-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141949923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2023.12.001
Delbaz Samadian, Imrose B. Muhit, Annalisa Occhipinti, Nashwan Dawood
Traditionally, nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) is used to assess the performance of structures under future hazards which is necessary to develop effective disaster risk management strategies. However, this method is computationally intensive and not suitable for analyzing a large number of structures on a city-wide scale. Surrogate models offer an efficient and reliable alternative and facilitate evaluating the performance of multiple structures under different hazard scenarios. However, creating a comprehensive database for surrogate modelling at the city level presents challenges. To overcome this, the present study proposes meta databases and a general framework for surrogate modelling of steel structures. The dataset includes 30,000 steel moment-resisting frame buildings, representing low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise buildings, with criteria for connections, beams, and columns. Pushover analysis is performed and structural parameters are extracted, and finally, incorporating two different machine learning algorithms, random forest and Shapley additive explanations, sensitivity and explainability analyses of the structural parameters are performed to identify the most significant factors in designing steel moment resisting frames. The framework and databases can be used as a validated source of surrogate modelling of steel frame structures in order for disaster risk management.
{"title":"Meta databases of steel frame buildings for surrogate modelling and machine learning-based feature importance analysis","authors":"Delbaz Samadian, Imrose B. Muhit, Annalisa Occhipinti, Nashwan Dawood","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2023.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditionally, nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) is used to assess the performance of structures under future hazards which is necessary to develop effective disaster risk management strategies. However, this method is computationally intensive and not suitable for analyzing a large number of structures on a city-wide scale. Surrogate models offer an efficient and reliable alternative and facilitate evaluating the performance of multiple structures under different hazard scenarios. However, creating a comprehensive database for surrogate modelling at the city level presents challenges. To overcome this, the present study proposes meta databases and a general framework for surrogate modelling of steel structures. The dataset includes 30,000 steel moment-resisting frame buildings, representing low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise buildings, with criteria for connections, beams, and columns. Pushover analysis is performed and structural parameters are extracted, and finally, incorporating two different machine learning algorithms, random forest and Shapley additive explanations, sensitivity and explainability analyses of the structural parameters are performed to identify the most significant factors in designing steel moment resisting frames. The framework and databases can be used as a validated source of surrogate modelling of steel frame structures in order for disaster risk management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 20-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741623000716/pdfft?md5=fa9df698a0344d0a61fe3521761c30dd&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741623000716-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139109212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2024-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2024.01.001
Samantha Louise N. Jarder , Osamu Maruyama , Lessandro Estelito O. Garciano
Losses due to hazards are inevitable and numerical simulations for estimations are complex. This study proposes a model for estimating correlated seismic damages and losses of a water supply pipeline system as an alternative for numerical simulations. The common approach in other research shows average damage spots per mesh estimated statistically independent to one another. Spatially distributed lifeline systems, such as water supply pipelines, are interconnected, and seismic spatial variability affects the damages across the region; thus, spatial correlation of damage spots is an important factor in target areas for portfolio loss estimation. Generally, simulations are used to estimate possible losses; however, these assume each damage behaves independently and uncorrelated. This paper assumed that damages per mesh behave in a Poisson distribution to avoid over-dispersion and eliminate negative losses in estimations. The purpose of this study is to obtain a probabilistic portfolio loss model of an extensive water supply area. The proposed model was compared to the numerical simulation data with the correlated Poisson distribution. The application of the Normal To Anything (NORTA) obtained correlations for Poisson Distributions. The proposed probabilistic portfolio loss model, based on the generalized linear model and central limit theory, estimated the possible losses, such as the Probable Maximum Loss (PML, 90% non-exceedance) or Normal Expected Loss (NEL, 50 % non-exceedance). The proposed model can be used in other lifeline systems as well, though additional investigation is needed for confirmation. From the estimations, a seismic physical portfolio loss for the water supply system was presented. The portfolio was made to show possible outcomes for the system. The proposed method was tested and analyzed using an artificial field and a location-based scenario of a water supply pipeline system. This would aid in pre-disaster planning and would require only a few steps and time.
灾害造成的损失是不可避免的,而用于估算的数值模拟非常复杂。本研究提出了一种估算供水管道系统相关地震破坏和损失的模型,作为数值模拟的替代方法。其他研究中的常见方法是对每个网格的平均破坏点进行统计估算,这些破坏点彼此独立。空间分布的生命线系统(如供水管道)是相互连接的,地震的空间变化会影响整个区域的破坏情况;因此,破坏点的空间相关性是组合损失估计目标区域的一个重要因素。一般情况下,我们使用模拟来估算可能的损失;但是,这些模拟假定每个损坏点的行为都是独立和不相关的。本文假定每个网格的损坏情况呈泊松分布,以避免过度分散,并消除估算中的负损失。本研究的目的是获得一个大面积供水区域的概率组合损失模型。提出的模型与相关泊松分布的数值模拟数据进行了比较。应用 Normal To Anything (NORTA) 获得了泊松分布的相关性。基于广义线性模型和中心极限理论提出的概率组合损失模型估算了可能的损失,如可能最大损失(PML,90% 不超标)或正常预期损失(NEL,50% 不超标)。建议的模型也可用于其他生命线系统,但还需要更多的调查来确认。通过估算,提出了供水系统的地震物理组合损失。该组合显示了系统可能出现的结果。使用人工场地和基于位置的供水管道系统场景对所提出的方法进行了测试和分析。这将有助于灾前规划,而且只需要几个步骤和时间。
{"title":"A probabilistic estimation model for seismic physical portfolio loss of a water supply pipeline system","authors":"Samantha Louise N. Jarder , Osamu Maruyama , Lessandro Estelito O. Garciano","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Losses due to hazards are inevitable and numerical simulations for estimations are complex. This study proposes a model for estimating correlated seismic damages and losses of a water supply pipeline system as an alternative for numerical simulations. The common approach in other research shows average damage spots per mesh estimated statistically independent to one another. Spatially distributed lifeline systems, such as water supply pipelines, are interconnected, and seismic spatial variability affects the damages across the region; thus, spatial correlation of damage spots is an important factor in target areas for portfolio loss estimation. Generally, simulations are used to estimate possible losses; however, these assume each damage behaves independently and uncorrelated. This paper assumed that damages per mesh behave in a Poisson distribution to avoid over-dispersion and eliminate negative losses in estimations. The purpose of this study is to obtain a probabilistic portfolio loss model of an extensive water supply area. The proposed model was compared to the numerical simulation data with the correlated Poisson distribution. The application of the Normal To Anything (NORTA) obtained correlations for Poisson Distributions. The proposed probabilistic portfolio loss model, based on the generalized linear model and central limit theory, estimated the possible losses, such as the Probable Maximum Loss (PML, 90% non-exceedance) or Normal Expected Loss (NEL, 50 % non-exceedance). The proposed model can be used in other lifeline systems as well, though additional investigation is needed for confirmation. From the estimations, a seismic physical portfolio loss for the water supply system was presented. The portfolio was made to show possible outcomes for the system. The proposed method was tested and analyzed using an artificial field and a location-based scenario of a water supply pipeline system. This would aid in pre-disaster planning and would require only a few steps and time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 44-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000012/pdfft?md5=c38f42b029086338484ad2fc3d424ccb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000012-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139504329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}