Gonzalo Garcia-Castro, Daniela S. Avila-Varela, Ignacio Castillejo, Nuria Sebastian-Galles
Recent studies suggest that cognateness boosts bilingual lexical acquisition. This study proposes an account in which language co-activation accelerates accumulation of word-learning instances across languages. This account predicts a larger cognate facilitation for words in the lower-exposure language than in the higher-exposure language, as the former receive co-activation from their translations more frequently. Bayesian Item Response Theory was used to model acquisition trajectories for 604 Catalan-Spanish translations from a dataset of 366 12–32 month-old bilinguals (M = 22.23 months, 175 female, mainly White, collected 2020–2022). Results show a larger cognate facilitation for words in the lower-exposure language (d = .276), than for words in the higher-exposure language (d = .022), supporting a language exposure-moderated account for the effect of cognateness on lexical acquisition.
{"title":"Cognate beginnings to bilingual lexical acquisition","authors":"Gonzalo Garcia-Castro, Daniela S. Avila-Varela, Ignacio Castillejo, Nuria Sebastian-Galles","doi":"10.1111/cdev.14170","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cdev.14170","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent studies suggest that cognateness boosts bilingual lexical acquisition. This study proposes an account in which language co-activation accelerates accumulation of word-learning instances across languages. This account predicts a larger cognate facilitation for words in the lower-exposure language than in the higher-exposure language, as the former receive co-activation from their translations more frequently. Bayesian Item Response Theory was used to model acquisition trajectories for 604 Catalan-Spanish translations from a dataset of 366 12–32 month-old bilinguals (<i>M</i> = 22.23 months, 175 female, mainly White, collected 2020–2022). Results show a larger cognate facilitation for words in the lower-exposure language (<i>d</i> = .276), than for words in the higher-exposure language (<i>d</i> = .022), supporting a language exposure-moderated account for the effect of cognateness on lexical acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"96 1","pages":"286-300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142281153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study examined children's self-assessment of their prosociality, relative to average peers, in situations where the recipient is described as “needy” versus “not needy” (at a school of average socioeconomic level in south Israel; N = 158; aged 6–12 years; 51% males, December–May 2021). The results show that older children exhibited the better-than-average (BTA) effect by seeing themselves as more generous than peers. In contrast, younger children displayed the worse-than-average effect by expecting peers to be more generous than themselves. However, both effects were attenuated (