The abilities to reason probabilistically and infer causality at a distance support social inferences and emerge early in neurotypical development. We examined these capacities in 3- to 5-year-olds with and without autism. In Experiment 1 (N = 100, 73% males, predominantly White), autistic children were unable to discriminate high- from low-probability causes until age 5, whereas neurotypical children succeeded by age 3. In Experiment 2 (N = 100, 71% males, predominantly White), autistic children inferred non-contact causality in physical events by age 3 and in social events by age 4, with exploratory data suggesting group differences. We conclude that early emerging differences in children's interpretation of socially relevant causal cues may partly contribute to the development of social differences in autism.
{"title":"Differences in causal reasoning in preschool-aged children with and without autism.","authors":"Tiffany Wang,Leslie J Carver,Caren M Walker","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf040","url":null,"abstract":"The abilities to reason probabilistically and infer causality at a distance support social inferences and emerge early in neurotypical development. We examined these capacities in 3- to 5-year-olds with and without autism. In Experiment 1 (N = 100, 73% males, predominantly White), autistic children were unable to discriminate high- from low-probability causes until age 5, whereas neurotypical children succeeded by age 3. In Experiment 2 (N = 100, 71% males, predominantly White), autistic children inferred non-contact causality in physical events by age 3 and in social events by age 4, with exploratory data suggesting group differences. We conclude that early emerging differences in children's interpretation of socially relevant causal cues may partly contribute to the development of social differences in autism.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146072888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charissa S L Cheah,Hyun Su Cho,Ana Katrina Aquino,Yao Sun,Bumo Zhang,Yeram Cheong,Cixin Wang,Li-Wen Wu,Laura Wray-Lake
Little is known about Asian American family processes that support adolescents' civic engagement, especially in the context of anti-Asian racism. This convergent mixed-method explanatory study examined bidirectional racial-civic socialization (RCS) between Asian American parent-adolescent dyads around racial discrimination and how RCS relates to adolescents' civic engagement. Using observations of 78 Asian American parent-adolescent dyads discussing anti-Asian hate, exploratory qualitative analyses identified how critical consciousness is intertwined in bidirectional RCS. In surveys with 449 dyads (Mparent-age = 46; 81% mothers; Madolescent-age = 14.6; 48% girls), actor-partner models found that adolescent-driven RCS related to higher adolescent civic engagement, especially when adolescents were high in critical motivation. Findings have implications for facilitating racial-civic bidirectional socialization and promoting Asian American adolescents' civic development.
{"title":"\"We can make an impact\": A mixed method examination of Asian American parents' and adolescents' bidirectional racial-civic socialization.","authors":"Charissa S L Cheah,Hyun Su Cho,Ana Katrina Aquino,Yao Sun,Bumo Zhang,Yeram Cheong,Cixin Wang,Li-Wen Wu,Laura Wray-Lake","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf012","url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about Asian American family processes that support adolescents' civic engagement, especially in the context of anti-Asian racism. This convergent mixed-method explanatory study examined bidirectional racial-civic socialization (RCS) between Asian American parent-adolescent dyads around racial discrimination and how RCS relates to adolescents' civic engagement. Using observations of 78 Asian American parent-adolescent dyads discussing anti-Asian hate, exploratory qualitative analyses identified how critical consciousness is intertwined in bidirectional RCS. In surveys with 449 dyads (Mparent-age = 46; 81% mothers; Madolescent-age = 14.6; 48% girls), actor-partner models found that adolescent-driven RCS related to higher adolescent civic engagement, especially when adolescents were high in critical motivation. Findings have implications for facilitating racial-civic bidirectional socialization and promoting Asian American adolescents' civic development.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146072890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Previous research finds that children are surprisingly closed to the possibility of unlikely events. Two studies with 5-to-8-year-old children (N = 240; 68% female; mixed ethnicities) and adults (N = 550; 42% female; mixed ethnicities) collected between July 2020 and December 2020, found that children are more open to the possibility of all event types in the future than in the past, and that all age groups were less likely to categorize all event types as impossible when they had the option of categorizing them as "possible, but unlikely" than when they only had the option of calling them "possible." However, many children still frequently categorized unlikely events as impossible. These findings shed light on conditions that influence children's possibility judgments while underscoring their robust tendency to conflate improbability with impossibility.
{"title":"Not yesterday, but maybe tomorrow: Children are more open to possibility in the future than the past.","authors":"Umang Khan, Christina Starmans","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research finds that children are surprisingly closed to the possibility of unlikely events. Two studies with 5-to-8-year-old children (N = 240; 68% female; mixed ethnicities) and adults (N = 550; 42% female; mixed ethnicities) collected between July 2020 and December 2020, found that children are more open to the possibility of all event types in the future than in the past, and that all age groups were less likely to categorize all event types as impossible when they had the option of categorizing them as \"possible, but unlikely\" than when they only had the option of calling them \"possible.\" However, many children still frequently categorized unlikely events as impossible. These findings shed light on conditions that influence children's possibility judgments while underscoring their robust tendency to conflate improbability with impossibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Manuel Bohn,Julia Christin Prein,Agnes Ayikoru,Florian M Bednarski,Ardain Dzabatou,Michael C Frank,Annette M E Henderson,Joan Isabella,Josefine Kalbitz,Patricia Kanngiesser,Dilara Keşşafoğlu,Bahar Köymen,Maira V Manrique-Hernandez,Shirley Magazi,Lizbeth Mújica-Manrique,Julia Ohlendorf,Damilola Olaoba,Wesley R Pieters,Sarah Pope-Caldwell,Katie Slocombe,Robert Z Sparks,Jahnavi Sunderarajan,Wilson Vieira,Zhen Zhang,Yufei Zong,Roman Stengelin,Daniel B M Haun
Theoretical accounts typically assume that key features of human socio-cognitive development are universal. This paper reports a large-scale cross-cultural study (17 communities, diverse ethnicities, N = 1,377, 709 female, mean = 5.50 years, -collected March 2022 to January 2024) on gaze following in early childhood. To test for universality, cognitive processing signatures were derived from a computational model treating gaze following as social vector estimation. Results showed substantial variation between communities and individuals. Yet, the processing signature was found in all communities. Individual differences in performance were related to children's familiarity with the data-collection device but not opportunities for social interaction. These results provide strong evidence for gaze following as a universal socio-cognitive process despite cultural and individual-level variation in absolute performance.
{"title":"A universal of human social cognition: Children from 17 communities process gaze in similar ways.","authors":"Manuel Bohn,Julia Christin Prein,Agnes Ayikoru,Florian M Bednarski,Ardain Dzabatou,Michael C Frank,Annette M E Henderson,Joan Isabella,Josefine Kalbitz,Patricia Kanngiesser,Dilara Keşşafoğlu,Bahar Köymen,Maira V Manrique-Hernandez,Shirley Magazi,Lizbeth Mújica-Manrique,Julia Ohlendorf,Damilola Olaoba,Wesley R Pieters,Sarah Pope-Caldwell,Katie Slocombe,Robert Z Sparks,Jahnavi Sunderarajan,Wilson Vieira,Zhen Zhang,Yufei Zong,Roman Stengelin,Daniel B M Haun","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf017","url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical accounts typically assume that key features of human socio-cognitive development are universal. This paper reports a large-scale cross-cultural study (17 communities, diverse ethnicities, N = 1,377, 709 female, mean = 5.50 years, -collected March 2022 to January 2024) on gaze following in early childhood. To test for universality, cognitive processing signatures were derived from a computational model treating gaze following as social vector estimation. Results showed substantial variation between communities and individuals. Yet, the processing signature was found in all communities. Individual differences in performance were related to children's familiarity with the data-collection device but not opportunities for social interaction. These results provide strong evidence for gaze following as a universal socio-cognitive process despite cultural and individual-level variation in absolute performance.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Google Search is a popular tool for acquiring information online, but little is known about children's trust in search engines. Across two studies conducted in 2021-2024, 240 4- to 8-year-old children (122 boys, 118 girls; 75% White; 92% non-Hispanic) were asked whether they trusted Google and a teacher to answer questions about stable information (e.g., geographical locations) and changing information (e.g., the weather). With increasing age, children endorsed Google at higher rates and the teacher at lower rates. When asked about the Internet and an unfamiliar search engine, children endorsed Google and the Internet more often than an unfamiliar search engine. Children's intuitions about search engines changed with development, with younger children relying more on familiarity as a cue to trust.
{"title":"\"I've seen Google before!\": Young children's intuitions about Google's capabilities.","authors":"Lauren N Girouard,Judith H Danovitch","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf011","url":null,"abstract":"Google Search is a popular tool for acquiring information online, but little is known about children's trust in search engines. Across two studies conducted in 2021-2024, 240 4- to 8-year-old children (122 boys, 118 girls; 75% White; 92% non-Hispanic) were asked whether they trusted Google and a teacher to answer questions about stable information (e.g., geographical locations) and changing information (e.g., the weather). With increasing age, children endorsed Google at higher rates and the teacher at lower rates. When asked about the Internet and an unfamiliar search engine, children endorsed Google and the Internet more often than an unfamiliar search engine. Children's intuitions about search engines changed with development, with younger children relying more on familiarity as a cue to trust.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145994970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Relational reasoning (RR) is a higher-order cognitive ability associated with academic performance. Most prior studies on RR-mathematics association have used a cross-sectional design. The current study aimed to examine their longitudinal relations and underlying mechanisms. A sample of 235 sixth graders (138 boys, mean age = 12.32 years, SD = .903) in Hong Kong were tested on RR (nonverbal and verbal) and mathematics achievement (numerical operations and mathematical problem-solving). One hundred and ninety-five (118 boys, mean age = 13.32 years, SD = .945) of them were re-assessed after one year on mathematics achievement and potential mediators (word problem reasoning, arithmetic fluency, and arithmetic principle understanding). Results indicated that nonverbal RR predicted numerical operations through arithmetic principle understanding, and both nonverbal and verbal RR predicted mathematical problem solving through word problem reasoning. The findings advanced the literature on RR-mathematics association and suggested directions for interventions.
{"title":"Longitudinal association between relational reasoning and mathematics achievement: Mediating roles of arithmetic principle understanding and word problem reasoning.","authors":"Eason Sai-Kit Yip, Terry Tin-Yau Wong","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relational reasoning (RR) is a higher-order cognitive ability associated with academic performance. Most prior studies on RR-mathematics association have used a cross-sectional design. The current study aimed to examine their longitudinal relations and underlying mechanisms. A sample of 235 sixth graders (138 boys, mean age = 12.32 years, SD = .903) in Hong Kong were tested on RR (nonverbal and verbal) and mathematics achievement (numerical operations and mathematical problem-solving). One hundred and ninety-five (118 boys, mean age = 13.32 years, SD = .945) of them were re-assessed after one year on mathematics achievement and potential mediators (word problem reasoning, arithmetic fluency, and arithmetic principle understanding). Results indicated that nonverbal RR predicted numerical operations through arithmetic principle understanding, and both nonverbal and verbal RR predicted mathematical problem solving through word problem reasoning. The findings advanced the literature on RR-mathematics association and suggested directions for interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Women are often expected to and do perform service more than men. When do these gendered expectations and behaviors develop? 127 children (aged 6-9 years, 64 girls, 63 boys, 57% white children, 43% children of color) made decisions about who should do and whether they themselves would do various classroom jobs-a child-friendly example of service. After age 9, girls were more likely to choose to do service than boys, even though children generally thought everyone should do service. Whereas parents' relevant beliefs and the gender distribution of housework did not relate to developing gender differences, parent-child conversations revealed that girls' more frequent choice to do service may be rooted in their perceived personal benefits of doing service.
{"title":"Who should do and who chooses to do service: Girls' and boys' developing service-related beliefs and behaviors.","authors":"Sophie H Arnold,Marjorie Rhodes","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf008","url":null,"abstract":"Women are often expected to and do perform service more than men. When do these gendered expectations and behaviors develop? 127 children (aged 6-9 years, 64 girls, 63 boys, 57% white children, 43% children of color) made decisions about who should do and whether they themselves would do various classroom jobs-a child-friendly example of service. After age 9, girls were more likely to choose to do service than boys, even though children generally thought everyone should do service. Whereas parents' relevant beliefs and the gender distribution of housework did not relate to developing gender differences, parent-child conversations revealed that girls' more frequent choice to do service may be rooted in their perceived personal benefits of doing service.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145986648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sierra Clifford, Mary C Davis, Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant
This study examined genetic and environmental influences on twins' and parents' positive and negative affect during a parent-child conflict discussion and a positive discussion, captured by automated facial coding. Associations with internalizing, externalizing, and ADHD symptoms were examined. Twins (N = 560 50.94%; female; Mage = 9.72, SD = .94; data collected 2017-2020) and parents (N = 302; 583 videos) were from socioeconomically diverse families, and primarily White (57.07%) or Hispanic (26.78%). Child and parent positive affect were influenced by the shared and nonshared environment and child negative affect was heritable, with similar etiology across tasks. Only child positive affect during the conflict discussion consistently related to lower internalizing, externalizing, and ADHD symptoms (R2: 1.3%-3.6% of variance). Findings support positive affect under stress as an environmentally influenced resilience factor.
{"title":"Children's affect: Automated coding, context effects, relations with maternal affect, and heritability.","authors":"Sierra Clifford, Mary C Davis, Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacaf043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacaf043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined genetic and environmental influences on twins' and parents' positive and negative affect during a parent-child conflict discussion and a positive discussion, captured by automated facial coding. Associations with internalizing, externalizing, and ADHD symptoms were examined. Twins (N = 560 50.94%; female; Mage = 9.72, SD = .94; data collected 2017-2020) and parents (N = 302; 583 videos) were from socioeconomically diverse families, and primarily White (57.07%) or Hispanic (26.78%). Child and parent positive affect were influenced by the shared and nonshared environment and child negative affect was heritable, with similar etiology across tasks. Only child positive affect during the conflict discussion consistently related to lower internalizing, externalizing, and ADHD symptoms (R2: 1.3%-3.6% of variance). Findings support positive affect under stress as an environmentally influenced resilience factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lily Steyer, Rebecca Gleit, Crystal Hawkins, Maya Provençal, Francis Pearman, Jelena Obradović
In response to recent state and local reforms, schools have reduced formal exclusionary discipline (e.g., suspensions, expulsions). Our report highlights the largely undocumented informal exclusionary discipline practices that emerge when formal discipline is no longer legally or culturally permissible. We define informal exclusionary discipline practices as within-classroom, within-school, and out-of-school practices beyond formal discipline that limit students' access to classroom learning opportunities in PreK-12 settings. These practices disproportionately affect racially/ethnically and economically marginalized students and students with disabilities, thereby reproducing formal discipline inequalities, but have received scant attention in contemporary policy discussions. We offer policy considerations for federal, state, and district policymakers to document and address these practices.
{"title":"Informal exclusionary discipline practices in US schools: Recent evidence and policy considerations","authors":"Lily Steyer, Rebecca Gleit, Crystal Hawkins, Maya Provençal, Francis Pearman, Jelena Obradović","doi":"10.1002/sop2.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.70000","url":null,"abstract":"In response to recent state and local reforms, schools have reduced formal exclusionary discipline (e.g., suspensions, expulsions). Our report highlights the largely undocumented informal exclusionary discipline practices that emerge when formal discipline is no longer legally or culturally permissible. We define informal exclusionary discipline practices as within-classroom, within-school, and out-of-school practices beyond formal discipline that limit students' access to classroom learning opportunities in PreK-12 settings. These practices disproportionately affect racially/ethnically and economically marginalized students and students with disabilities, thereby reproducing formal discipline inequalities, but have received scant attention in contemporary policy discussions. We offer policy considerations for federal, state, and district policymakers to document and address these practices.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145813624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning to capitalize in English requires identifying a word's type and sentence position. In two cloze studies (2021–2022), Australian students of all genders (95% White, monolingual) spelled words with one and two capitalization cues (proper nouns, sentence-initial words) and no-cue control words. High school (12–18 years, n = 59) and university students (18–63 years, n = 78) exhibited near-perfect capitalization. Primary school students (8–12 years) writing single words (n = 99) used proper-noun cues more than sentence-initial cues (ds > 0.49), but when writing consecutive words (n = 101), capitalized more accurately with two cues than one (ds > 0.32). Early capitalization appears better with more cues, but task format influences children's use of grammatical context.
{"title":"Capital Gains: Effects of Word Class and Sentence Position on Capitalization Use Across Age","authors":"Emilia Hawkey, Matthew A. Palmer, Nenagh Kemp","doi":"10.1111/cdev.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cdev.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learning to capitalize in English requires identifying a word's type and sentence position. In two cloze studies (2021–2022), Australian students of all genders (95% White, monolingual) spelled words with one and two capitalization cues (proper nouns, sentence-initial words) and no-cue control words. High school (12–18 years, <i>n</i> = 59) and university students (18–63 years, <i>n</i> = 78) exhibited near-perfect capitalization. Primary school students (8–12 years) writing single words (<i>n</i> = 99) used proper-noun cues more than sentence-initial cues (<i>d</i>s > 0.49), but when writing consecutive words (<i>n</i> = 101), capitalized more accurately with two cues than one (<i>d</i>s > 0.32). Early capitalization appears better with more cues, but task format influences children's use of grammatical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"96 6","pages":"2233-2246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdev.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145427470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}