Daniel Gerrity, Katherine Crank, Eva Steinle-Darling, Brian M. Pecson
Communities are now turning to potable reuse to augment their water supply portfolios in response to increasing demand and climate uncertainty. One barrier to broader implementation is a lack of regulations for direct potable reuse (DPR) in some locations. An incomplete understanding of the foundation of existing DPR frameworks may be contributing to this barrier. The objective of this study was to use a publicly available quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) tool—DPRisk—to explain the basis behind California's existing indirect potable reuse regulations, California's draft DPR regulations, and an Expert Panel's response to those draft regulations. Then, leveraging a robust raw wastewater pathogen dataset from the literature, DPRisk was used to justify two alternatives: one based on maximum simulated pathogen concentrations and the other based on 97.4th percentile concentrations. The latter represents an effort to seek equivalency between “raw wastewater” (i.e., California) and “treated effluent” (i.e., Texas) approaches. Using justified QMRA assumptions, the baseline log reduction value (LRV) targets were determined to be 15/11/11 (maximum) or 13/10/10 (97.4th percentile) for viruses, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium. Additionally, instead of augmenting the baseline LRVs to account for undetected treatment process failures, tolerances for off-specification conditions (e.g., up to 3 logs for 3–12 days per year) were characterized. With this foundational knowledge, stakeholders can better understand and adopt these frameworks or use DPRisk to establish a new framework that better addresses their unique constraints, including considerations for preferred treatment paradigms and capital and operational costs.
{"title":"Establishing pathogen log reduction value targets for direct potable reuse in the United States","authors":"Daniel Gerrity, Katherine Crank, Eva Steinle-Darling, Brian M. Pecson","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1353","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Communities are now turning to potable reuse to augment their water supply portfolios in response to increasing demand and climate uncertainty. One barrier to broader implementation is a lack of regulations for direct potable reuse (DPR) in some locations. An incomplete understanding of the foundation of existing DPR frameworks may be contributing to this barrier. The objective of this study was to use a publicly available quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) tool—DPRisk—to explain the basis behind California's existing indirect potable reuse regulations, California's draft DPR regulations, and an Expert Panel's response to those draft regulations. Then, leveraging a robust raw wastewater pathogen dataset from the literature, DPRisk was used to justify two alternatives: one based on maximum simulated pathogen concentrations and the other based on 97.4th percentile concentrations. The latter represents an effort to seek equivalency between “raw wastewater” (i.e., California) and “treated effluent” (i.e., Texas) approaches. Using justified QMRA assumptions, the baseline log reduction value (LRV) targets were determined to be 15/11/11 (maximum) or 13/10/10 (97.4th percentile) for viruses, <i>Giardia</i>, and <i>Cryptosporidium</i>. Additionally, instead of augmenting the baseline LRVs to account for undetected treatment process failures, tolerances for off-specification conditions (e.g., up to 3 logs for 3–12 days per year) were characterized. With this foundational knowledge, stakeholders can better understand and adopt these frameworks or use DPRisk to establish a new framework that better addresses their unique constraints, including considerations for preferred treatment paradigms and capital and operational costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1353","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50136328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lindsay E. Anderson, Manda Tchonlla, Martin Earle, Ryan Swinamer, Graham A. Gagnon
Changing source water quality namely through increasing natural organic matter (NOM) concentration challenges surface water treatment, especially direct filtration. We conducted a pilot-scale assessment of various adaptation strategies (e.g., clarification, granular activated carbon [GAC] filtration) for direct filtration facilities under the stress of rising NOM levels. Recognizing that changing source water can impact broader aspects of treatment, we considered the implications of Fe and Mn removal via KMnO4 pre-oxidation. GAC media showed promise as an adaptation strategy, providing ~60% removal of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and a significant reduction in disinfection by-product formation potential (DBPfp). However, KMnO4 pretreatment showed limited Mn and Fe removal, and filters with GAC media released dissolved Mn at up to ~30% of prefilter levels. These data suggest that using GAC may come with the risk of poor Mn removal performance if Mn is not removed during pretreatment. This work highlights the complexities anticipated under emerging climate pressures and emphasizes the need for comprehensive treatment solutions that consider factors beyond NOM.
{"title":"Adapting direct filtration to increasing source water dissolved organic carbon using clarification and granular activated carbon","authors":"Lindsay E. Anderson, Manda Tchonlla, Martin Earle, Ryan Swinamer, Graham A. Gagnon","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1352","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Changing source water quality namely through increasing natural organic matter (NOM) concentration challenges surface water treatment, especially direct filtration. We conducted a pilot-scale assessment of various adaptation strategies (e.g., clarification, granular activated carbon [GAC] filtration) for direct filtration facilities under the stress of rising NOM levels. Recognizing that changing source water can impact broader aspects of treatment, we considered the implications of Fe and Mn removal via KMnO<sub>4</sub> pre-oxidation. GAC media showed promise as an adaptation strategy, providing ~60% removal of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and a significant reduction in disinfection by-product formation potential (DBPfp). However, KMnO<sub>4</sub> pretreatment showed limited Mn and Fe removal, and filters with GAC media released dissolved Mn at up to ~30% of prefilter levels. These data suggest that using GAC may come with the risk of poor Mn removal performance if Mn is not removed during pretreatment. This work highlights the complexities anticipated under emerging climate pressures and emphasizes the need for comprehensive treatment solutions that consider factors beyond NOM.</p>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1352","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50136329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eric S. Peterson, William J. Raseman, Benjamin D. Stanford, Gretchen M. Bruce, Heather Klintworth, David Reckhow
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a regulatory revision of the Disinfectant and Disinfection Byproduct Rule (DBPR) with a goal of limiting nationwide exposure to DBPs of emerging health concern. The occurrence of four brominated haloacetic acids (HAAs), which are generally more toxic in in vitro assays than the five currently regulated HAAs and are candidates for future regulation, were surveyed in 4924 public water systems under EPA's fourth unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4). Using UCMR4 data, this study evaluated the nationwide occurrence of nine HAA species and the potential for two regulatory scenarios (the mass sum of all nine HAA species, HAA9, or just the six brominated HAA species, HAA6Br) to control nationwide exposure to the most toxic HAAs. Neither HAA9 nor HAA6Br approaches were effective for identifying water systems that exhibit high HAA exposure, assessed as additive cytotoxicity, because they are more specific to the HAA species that form at high concentrations rather than the species that are most toxic. However, the effectiveness of HAA6Br is highly sensitive to the relative toxicity of one HAA compound, monobromoacetic acid, which has the highest in vitro toxicity among HAAs but also the lowest occurrence and about which little is known regarding in vivo health risks. In contrast to HAA9, systems with high HAA-associated additive toxicity tend to share similar treatment and disinfectant characteristics as systems with high HAA6Br concentrations. Systems with high source water bromide and total organic carbon were far more likely to use chloramines as a disinfectant residual compared to other systems, but were no more likely to adopt organic precursor removal technologies (biofiltration, granular activated carbon, and ion exchange) than other systems, on average.
{"title":"Evaluating regulatory scenarios to limit U.S. nationwide exposure to cytotoxic haloacetic acids","authors":"Eric S. Peterson, William J. Raseman, Benjamin D. Stanford, Gretchen M. Bruce, Heather Klintworth, David Reckhow","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1351","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is cons<b>i</b>dering a regulatory revision of the Disinfectant and Disinfection Byproduct Rule (DBPR) with a goal of limiting nationwide exposure to DBPs of emerging health concern. The occurrence of four brominated haloacetic acids (HAAs), which are generally more toxic in in vitro assays than the five currently regulated HAAs and are candidates for future regulation, were surveyed in 4924 public water systems under EPA's fourth unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4). Using UCMR4 data, this study evaluated the nationwide occurrence of nine HAA species and the potential for two regulatory scenarios (the mass sum of all nine HAA species, HAA9, or just the six brominated HAA species, HAA6Br) to control nationwide exposure to the most toxic HAAs. Neither HAA9 nor HAA6Br approaches were effective for identifying water systems that exhibit high HAA exposure, assessed as additive cytotoxicity, because they are more specific to the HAA species that form at high concentrations rather than the species that are most toxic. However, the effectiveness of HAA6Br is highly sensitive to the relative toxicity of one HAA compound, monobromoacetic acid, which has the highest in vitro toxicity among HAAs but also the lowest occurrence and about which little is known regarding in vivo health risks. In contrast to HAA9, systems with high HAA-associated additive toxicity tend to share similar treatment and disinfectant characteristics as systems with high HAA6Br concentrations. Systems with high source water bromide and total organic carbon were far more likely to use chloramines as a disinfectant residual compared to other systems, but were no more likely to adopt organic precursor removal technologies (biofiltration, granular activated carbon, and ion exchange) than other systems, on average.</p>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1351","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50131822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marc Edwards, Roger Arnold, Becki Rosenfeldt, Sheldon V. Masters, Jeffrey Parks, Min Tang
Galvanized iron pipe (GIP) was once widely installed in publicly and privately owned potable water systems. This antiquated plumbing material can cause water discoloration from iron release, head loss resulting from corrosion scale buildup, and occasional problems with lead (Pb) release to drinking water. In this work, a GIP management framework for utilities is formulated via a literature review and several case studies. The GIP management plan is intended to guide water systems with understanding and addressing GIP issues while considering consumer expectations, corrosion control challenges, variable performance, and associated cost–benefit analysis for corrective actions.
{"title":"Utility considerations in developing a galvanized iron water pipe management plan","authors":"Marc Edwards, Roger Arnold, Becki Rosenfeldt, Sheldon V. Masters, Jeffrey Parks, Min Tang","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1350","url":null,"abstract":"Galvanized iron pipe (GIP) was once widely installed in publicly and privately owned potable water systems. This antiquated plumbing material can cause water discoloration from iron release, head loss resulting from corrosion scale buildup, and occasional problems with lead (Pb) release to drinking water. In this work, a GIP management framework for utilities is formulated via a literature review and several case studies. The GIP management plan is intended to guide water systems with understanding and addressing GIP issues while considering consumer expectations, corrosion control challenges, variable performance, and associated cost–benefit analysis for corrective actions.","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1350","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50141342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}