首页 > 最新文献

Contact Dermatitis最新文献

英文 中文
Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Clonidine Transdermal Patch: Insights From a Rare Case With Prolonged Cutaneous Exposure 可乐定透皮贴剂致过敏性接触性皮炎:一例皮肤长时间接触的罕见病例。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70035
Marta Marchetti, Alessandro Marti, Maria Rita Messina, Giovanni Paoletti, Enrico Heffler
{"title":"Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Clonidine Transdermal Patch: Insights From a Rare Case With Prolonged Cutaneous Exposure","authors":"Marta Marchetti, Alessandro Marti, Maria Rita Messina, Giovanni Paoletti, Enrico Heffler","doi":"10.1111/cod.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"86-88"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145354008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Allergy by Proxy to Penicillins Presenting as Recurrent Idiopathic Anaphylaxis Within the Household: A Case Report 对青霉素的代用过敏在家庭中表现为复发性特发性过敏反应:一个病例报告。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70014
Adrien Bénic, Evangéline Clark, Pascal Demoly, Anca Mirela Chiriac
<p>A 38-year-old man with a history of allergic rhinitis experienced seven episodes of anaphylaxis at home, one of which progressed to anaphylactic shock. He denied any medication use, ingestion of specific foods or Hymenoptera stings prior to these episodes.</p><p>The initial evaluation was conducted in an allergist's office. The baseline serum tryptase level was 4.10 μg/L. Skin testing for common food allergens yielded negative results, with an appropriate positive histamine control.</p><p>The patient was subsequently referred to our unit for further assessment. On detailed re-questioning, he reported that his anaphylactic reactions consistently coincided with periods during which his children were receiving penicillin therapy, and he was able to identify specific triggers for two of these episodes (Table 1).</p><p>Serum-specific IgE testing for beta-lactams (ImmunoCAP, Thermo Fisher Scientific/Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) was positive only for amoxicillin (0.26 kU<sub>A</sub>/L). Total serum IgE was not assessed.</p><p>Skin testing for beta-lactams was performed in accordance with established guidelines [<span>1</span>]. Skin prick tests produced immediate positive reactions to amoxicillin (0.2 mg/mL; 1:100) and ampicillin (2 mg/mL; 1:10), whereas intradermal tests yielded an immediate positive reaction to penicillin G (10,000 IU/mL; undiluted), confirming sensitisation to penicillins.</p><p>The absence of hypersensitivity to alternative beta-lactams—specifically the cephalosporins cefuroxime and ceftriaxone—was demonstrated by negative skin tests (20 mg/mL; undiluted) and negative drug provocation tests at daily therapeutic doses of 1000 and 2000 mg, respectively.</p><p>‘Allergy by proxy’ refers to hypersensitivity reactions arising from unintentional exposure to an allergen used by another individual. Such exposure may occur directly, through physical contact with the person carrying the allergen, or indirectly, via contact with allergen-contaminated objects [<span>2</span>]. A well-documented example is kissing-induced allergy syndrome, in which oral exposure to amoxicillin-containing saliva triggers an allergic reaction [<span>3</span>]. Similarly, anaphylaxis has been reported during sexual intercourse as a result of vaginal exposure to penicillin-containing semen [<span>4</span>].</p><p>In this case, the patient experienced severe IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions attributable to ‘allergy by proxy’, resulting from indirect exposure to amoxicillin via contact with items contaminated during his children's penicillin therapy. In the absence of any prior personal use of beta-lactams, sensitization to penicillins likely occurred through repeated cutaneous or mucosal exposure to penicillin residues within the household.</p><p>The patient was advised to strictly avoid all penicillins and to remain vigilant regarding their use by household members. Considering the patient's history of anaphylactic reactions to trace amounts of penicillins, alo
一名38岁男性,有变应性鼻炎病史,在家经历了7次过敏反应,其中一次进展为过敏性休克。他否认在发作前服用过任何药物,摄入过特定食物或被膜翅目昆虫蜇伤。最初的评估是在过敏症专科医生的办公室进行的。基线血清胰蛋白酶水平为4.10 μg/L。常见食物过敏原的皮肤测试结果为阴性,组胺控制为适当的阳性。患者随后被转介到我们的单位作进一步评估。在详细的再询问中,他报告说,他的过敏反应与他的孩子接受青霉素治疗的时期一致,并且他能够确定其中两次发作的特定触发因素(表1)。β -内酰胺类血清特异性IgE检测(ImmunoCAP, Thermo Fisher Scientific/Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden)仅对阿莫西林呈阳性(0.26 kUA/L)。未评估血清总IgE。根据既定指南[1]进行β -内酰胺类皮肤试验。皮肤点刺试验对阿莫西林(0.2 mg/mL; 1:100)和氨苄西林(2 mg/mL; 1:100)立即产生阳性反应,而皮内试验对青霉素G (10,000 IU/mL;未稀释)立即产生阳性反应,证实对青霉素敏感。皮肤试验阴性(20mg /mL;未稀释)和每日治疗剂量分别为1000 mg和2000 mg的药物激发试验阴性,证实了对替代β -内酰胺类药物(特别是头孢菌素头孢呋辛和头孢曲松)没有过敏反应。“代理过敏”指的是由于无意中接触到另一个人使用的过敏原而引起的超敏反应。这种暴露可能通过与携带过敏原的人的身体接触直接发生,也可能通过与被过敏原污染的物体接触间接发生。一个有充分证据的例子是接吻引起的过敏综合征,其中口服接触含有阿莫西林的唾液会引发过敏反应[3]。同样,在性交过程中,由于阴道接触含青霉素的精液,也有过敏反应的报道。在本例中,患者经历了严重的ige介导的超敏反应,可归因于“代用过敏”,这是由于在儿童接受青霉素治疗期间,通过接触被污染的物品间接暴露于阿莫西林造成的。在没有任何个人先前使用β -内酰胺的情况下,对青霉素的致敏可能是通过在家庭中反复皮肤或粘膜暴露于青霉素残留物而发生的。建议患者严格避免使用所有青霉素,并对家庭成员使用这些药物保持警惕。考虑到患者对微量青霉素的过敏反应史,以及他的孩子在家中经常使用这些抗生素,医生开了一个装有肾上腺素自动注射器的急救包,以备意外再次接触时使用。如果将来需要β -内酰胺治疗,则只考虑有耐受记录的头孢菌素,特别是头孢呋辛和头孢曲松。这种观察到的耐受性与目前的证据一致,表明青霉素和具有不同侧链的头孢菌素之间的交叉反应是罕见的。总之,医生在调查反复出现的、无法解释的过敏反应时,应系统地评估环境暴露和人际暴露。识别隐藏的过敏原来源对于预防可能危及生命的复发至关重要。鉴于青霉素的广泛使用和诱发过敏反应的倾向,在这种情况下,应始终认为青霉素是潜在的罪魁祸首。作者声明无利益冲突。支持本研究结果的数据可根据通讯作者的合理要求提供。
{"title":"Allergy by Proxy to Penicillins Presenting as Recurrent Idiopathic Anaphylaxis Within the Household: A Case Report","authors":"Adrien Bénic,&nbsp;Evangéline Clark,&nbsp;Pascal Demoly,&nbsp;Anca Mirela Chiriac","doi":"10.1111/cod.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70014","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;A 38-year-old man with a history of allergic rhinitis experienced seven episodes of anaphylaxis at home, one of which progressed to anaphylactic shock. He denied any medication use, ingestion of specific foods or Hymenoptera stings prior to these episodes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The initial evaluation was conducted in an allergist's office. The baseline serum tryptase level was 4.10 μg/L. Skin testing for common food allergens yielded negative results, with an appropriate positive histamine control.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The patient was subsequently referred to our unit for further assessment. On detailed re-questioning, he reported that his anaphylactic reactions consistently coincided with periods during which his children were receiving penicillin therapy, and he was able to identify specific triggers for two of these episodes (Table 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Serum-specific IgE testing for beta-lactams (ImmunoCAP, Thermo Fisher Scientific/Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) was positive only for amoxicillin (0.26 kU&lt;sub&gt;A&lt;/sub&gt;/L). Total serum IgE was not assessed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skin testing for beta-lactams was performed in accordance with established guidelines [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Skin prick tests produced immediate positive reactions to amoxicillin (0.2 mg/mL; 1:100) and ampicillin (2 mg/mL; 1:10), whereas intradermal tests yielded an immediate positive reaction to penicillin G (10,000 IU/mL; undiluted), confirming sensitisation to penicillins.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The absence of hypersensitivity to alternative beta-lactams—specifically the cephalosporins cefuroxime and ceftriaxone—was demonstrated by negative skin tests (20 mg/mL; undiluted) and negative drug provocation tests at daily therapeutic doses of 1000 and 2000 mg, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Allergy by proxy’ refers to hypersensitivity reactions arising from unintentional exposure to an allergen used by another individual. Such exposure may occur directly, through physical contact with the person carrying the allergen, or indirectly, via contact with allergen-contaminated objects [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. A well-documented example is kissing-induced allergy syndrome, in which oral exposure to amoxicillin-containing saliva triggers an allergic reaction [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Similarly, anaphylaxis has been reported during sexual intercourse as a result of vaginal exposure to penicillin-containing semen [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this case, the patient experienced severe IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions attributable to ‘allergy by proxy’, resulting from indirect exposure to amoxicillin via contact with items contaminated during his children's penicillin therapy. In the absence of any prior personal use of beta-lactams, sensitization to penicillins likely occurred through repeated cutaneous or mucosal exposure to penicillin residues within the household.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The patient was advised to strictly avoid all penicillins and to remain vigilant regarding their use by household members. Considering the patient's history of anaphylactic reactions to trace amounts of penicillins, alo","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"81-82"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contact Allergy in Children in Europe: A Proposal for a Paediatric European Baseline Series 欧洲儿童接触性过敏:儿科欧洲基线系列的建议。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70033
Anne Birgitte Simonsen, Thomas Rustemeyer, Suzana Ljubojevicé Hadzavdic, Radoslaw Spiewak, Anna Belloni Fortina, Margarida Gonçalo, Ana Maria Giménez Arnau, Nidia Planella-Fontanillas, Marie L. A. Schuttelaar, Heinrich Dickel, Jonathan White, Györgyi Pónyai, S. Mark Wilkinson, Esen Özkaya, Ella Dendooven, Nives Pustišek, Jeanne Duus Johansen, Olivier Aerts, the European Baseline Series (EBS) Working Party of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD)

Background

Contact allergy is common in children, but no paediatric baseline series (pEBS) exists in Europe, despite recommendations in several countries.

Objectives

To collect and compare patch testing data from European centres to propose a common pEBS, possibly adapted by age group.

Materials and Methods

Data from 13 centres in 12 European countries were aggregated, covering 1816 children (1099 girls, 60.5%), aged 0–16 years, tested with the adult EBS (aEBS) and other frequent allergens between 2018 and 2022. Allergen selection followed adult criteria, with a stricter cut-off for inclusion, requiring at least 1% positive reactions (lower 95% CI) in children.

Results

A total of 17 allergens from the aEBS caused positive reactions in ≥ 1% of children (lower 95% CI). Common allergens included metals, fragrances, and preservatives. Tixocortol-21-pivalate was included despite its lower frequency due to its difficult-to-suspect nature. Additional frequent allergens were hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool, Amerchol L-101, and sorbitan sesquioleate. In total, 18 allergens were identified as potentially qualifying for a pEBS, with a further 7 as recommended additions.

Conclusion

Results from patch testing children across europe highlight a common set of frequent allergens, which should be considered for a pEBS.

背景:接触性过敏在儿童中很常见,但欧洲没有儿科基线系列(pEBS),尽管一些国家提出了建议。目的:收集和比较来自欧洲中心的补丁测试数据,提出一个共同的pEBS,可能根据年龄组进行调整。材料和方法:汇总了来自12个欧洲国家13个中心的数据,涵盖了1816名0-16岁的儿童(1099名女孩,60.5%),在2018年至2022年期间接受了成人EBS (aEBS)和其他常见过敏原的测试。过敏原选择遵循成人标准,纳入标准更为严格,要求儿童至少有1%的阳性反应(95% CI较低)。结果:来自aEBS的17种过敏原在≥1%的儿童中引起阳性反应(95% CI较低)。常见的过敏原包括金属、香料和防腐剂。tixocorol -21- private尽管由于其难以怀疑的性质,其频率较低,但仍被包括在内。其他常见的过敏原是柠檬烯和芳樟醇的氢过氧化物、萘酚L-101和山梨糖半半油酸酯。总共有18种过敏原被确定为可能符合pEBS的条件,另外还有7种过敏原被推荐添加。结论:来自欧洲各地儿童的斑贴试验结果强调了一组常见的过敏原,应考虑用于pEBS。
{"title":"Contact Allergy in Children in Europe: A Proposal for a Paediatric European Baseline Series","authors":"Anne Birgitte Simonsen,&nbsp;Thomas Rustemeyer,&nbsp;Suzana Ljubojevicé Hadzavdic,&nbsp;Radoslaw Spiewak,&nbsp;Anna Belloni Fortina,&nbsp;Margarida Gonçalo,&nbsp;Ana Maria Giménez Arnau,&nbsp;Nidia Planella-Fontanillas,&nbsp;Marie L. A. Schuttelaar,&nbsp;Heinrich Dickel,&nbsp;Jonathan White,&nbsp;Györgyi Pónyai,&nbsp;S. Mark Wilkinson,&nbsp;Esen Özkaya,&nbsp;Ella Dendooven,&nbsp;Nives Pustišek,&nbsp;Jeanne Duus Johansen,&nbsp;Olivier Aerts,&nbsp;the European Baseline Series (EBS) Working Party of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD)","doi":"10.1111/cod.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Contact allergy is common in children, but no paediatric baseline series (pEBS) exists in Europe, despite recommendations in several countries.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To collect and compare patch testing data from European centres to propose a common pEBS, possibly adapted by age group.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data from 13 centres in 12 European countries were aggregated, covering 1816 children (1099 girls, 60.5%), aged 0–16 years, tested with the adult EBS (aEBS) and other frequent allergens between 2018 and 2022. Allergen selection followed adult criteria, with a stricter cut-off for inclusion, requiring at least 1% positive reactions (lower 95% CI) in children.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 17 allergens from the aEBS caused positive reactions in ≥ 1% of children (lower 95% CI). Common allergens included metals, fragrances, and preservatives. Tixocortol-21-pivalate was included despite its lower frequency due to its difficult-to-suspect nature. Additional frequent allergens were hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool, Amerchol L-101, and sorbitan sesquioleate. In total, 18 allergens were identified as potentially qualifying for a pEBS, with a further 7 as recommended additions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Results from patch testing children across europe highlight a common set of frequent allergens, which should be considered for a pEBS.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"28-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145091399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Benzisothiazolinone Sensitization: A Retrospective Analysis From 2010 to 2022, in a Tertiary Belgian Hospital 2010 - 2022年比利时某三级医院苯并异噻唑啉酮致敏趋势回顾性分析
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70017
Anne Herman, Kiswendsida Sawadogo, Marie Baeck

Background

Benzisothiazolinone is a preservative responsible for allergic contact dermatitis, with occupational exposure being a common source of sensitisation.

Objectives

To investigate the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to benzisothiazolinone (BIT) in Belgium, between January 2010 and December 2022, and to assess co-sensitisations to other isothiazolinone derivatives in sensitised patients.

Methods

A retrospective monocentric study of patch test results with benzisothiazolinone (BIT) 0.1% petrolatum observed in patients attending a Belgian tertiary hospital. Prevalence, demographic data, concomitant patch test reactions, and clinical relevance were analysed.

Results

Overall, 65 of 6128 patients (1.06%) had a positive patch test reaction to benzisothiazolinone, and its sensitisation rate increased from 0.39% in 2010 to 3.72% in 2019 (followed by a decline to 0.71% in 2022). Occupational exposure was relevant in 20% of cases, with painters and metalworkers being the most affected professions. Unexpectedly, 10.8% of BIT-sensitised patients underwent patch testing due to complications following orthopaedic prosthesis implantation.

Conclusions

This study confirms a significant rise in BIT sensitisation over time, followed by a recent unexplained decline. Occupational exposure remains a major risk factor, but other environmental sources, including consumer products, such as leather products, should not be overlooked. The BIT sensitisation in orthopaedic prosthesis-related complications requires further investigation.

背景:苯并噻唑啉酮是过敏性接触性皮炎的防腐剂,职业暴露是致敏的常见来源。目的:调查2010年1月至2022年12月期间比利时对苯并异噻唑啉酮(BIT)的膜片试验阳性反应的发生率,并评估过敏患者对其他异噻唑啉酮衍生物的共致敏性。方法:回顾性单中心研究在比利时一家三级医院就诊的患者使用0.1%苯并异噻唑啉酮(BIT)凡士林进行斑贴试验的结果。分析了患病率、人口统计数据、伴随的斑贴试验反应和临床相关性。结果:总体而言,6128例患者中有65例(1.06%)对苯并异噻唑啉酮有斑贴试验阳性反应,其致敏率从2010年的0.39%上升至2019年的3.72%(2022年下降至0.71%)。20%的病例与职业暴露有关,油漆工和金属工人是受影响最大的职业。出乎意料的是,10.8%的bit敏感患者由于矫形假体植入后的并发症而进行了贴片测试。结论:该研究证实,随着时间的推移,BIT敏感性显著上升,随后出现了近期不明原因的下降。职业接触仍然是一个主要的风险因素,但其他环境来源,包括消费品,如皮革制品,也不应忽视。BIT在骨科假体相关并发症中的致敏作用有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Trends in Benzisothiazolinone Sensitization: A Retrospective Analysis From 2010 to 2022, in a Tertiary Belgian Hospital","authors":"Anne Herman,&nbsp;Kiswendsida Sawadogo,&nbsp;Marie Baeck","doi":"10.1111/cod.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Benzisothiazolinone is a preservative responsible for allergic contact dermatitis, with occupational exposure being a common source of sensitisation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To investigate the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to benzisothiazolinone (BIT) in Belgium, between January 2010 and December 2022, and to assess co-sensitisations to other isothiazolinone derivatives in sensitised patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective monocentric study of patch test results with benzisothiazolinone (BIT) 0.1% petrolatum observed in patients attending a Belgian tertiary hospital. Prevalence, demographic data, concomitant patch test reactions, and clinical relevance were analysed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, 65 of 6128 patients (1.06%) had a positive patch test reaction to benzisothiazolinone, and its sensitisation rate increased from 0.39% in 2010 to 3.72% in 2019 (followed by a decline to 0.71% in 2022). Occupational exposure was relevant in 20% of cases, with painters and metalworkers being the most affected professions. Unexpectedly, 10.8% of BIT-sensitised patients underwent patch testing due to complications following orthopaedic prosthesis implantation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study confirms a significant rise in BIT sensitisation over time, followed by a recent unexplained decline. Occupational exposure remains a major risk factor, but other environmental sources, including consumer products, such as leather products, should not be overlooked. The BIT sensitisation in orthopaedic prosthesis-related complications requires further investigation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145079866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Positive Patch Test Reactions to Dental Rubber Dams and Zinc Ethylphenyldithiocarbamate in a Patient Sensitised to Thiurams and Other Carbamates 对硫脲类和其他氨基甲酸盐敏感的患者对牙科橡胶坝和乙基苯基二硫氨基甲酸锌的阳性斑贴试验反应。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70032
Annarita Antelmi, Ellen Rydhög, Kevin Bertilsson, Ola Bergendorff
<p>A 63-year-old atopic man was referred by his dentist to the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in Malmö, Sweden, before an upcoming dental procedure with intended use of rubber dams, to ascertain his contact allergies. Patch testing in childhood had revealed a contact allergy to rubber chemicals. He had later worked assembling rubber trims but had to stop due to severe hand eczema.</p><p>Patch testing was performed with the Swedish baseline series, the extended baseline series used in Malmö, rubber series, and dental series with an occlusion time of 48 h. Test readings on day (D)3 and D7 [<span>1</span>] showed strong positive reactions to carba mix, thiuram mix and its components, and doubtful reactions to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate and zinc dibutyldithiocarbamate (Table 1).</p><p>Additional patch testing was performed with two exemplars of rubber dental dam acquired from the local Swedish Public Dental Service. Positive patch test reactions were found to both dental dams (Table 1), one natural rubber latex (NRL)-based (NRL) and one NRL-free. Skin prick tests with commercial latex extracts (Soluprick, ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark) turned out negative.</p><p>A chemical analysis of both dams with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described before [<span>2</span>] identified the presence of diphenylguanidine (0.08 mg/cm<sup>2</sup>) and zinc diethylthiocarbamate (0.04 mg/cm<sup>2</sup>) in the NRL-free dam. Zinc ethylphenyldithiocarbamate (ZEPC) (0.01 mg/cm<sup>2</sup>) was detected in the NRL-dam. The concentration and identity of ZEPC were determined by comparison with reference substances of UV spectrum and area under curve in the chromatogram.</p><p>Further patch tests were performed with ZEPC (> 98.0%, TCI, Zweindrecht, Belgium) in a dilution series resulting in positive reactions down to 0.01% in petrolatum. Twenty controls were tested negative to 0.1% and 0.01% in petrolatum.</p><p>The use of rubber dams (Figure 1) during endodontic treatment is recommended to isolate the tooth, prevent microbial contamination, and avoid aspiration or ingestion of dental materials [<span>3, 4</span>].</p><p>The potential for NRL gloves and rubber dam used during dental procedures to be the cause of immediate allergic reactions has been acknowledged [<span>5</span>]. Hitherto only one case of delayed reaction following the use of rubber dam has been suspected and described [<span>6</span>]. ZEPC has previously been reported as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis in a patient with exposure to rubber work gloves containing ZEPC [<span>7</span>].</p><p>Our patient exhibited a strong (+++) patch test reaction to carba mix, with only doubtful reactions to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate and zinc dibutyldithiocarbamate, and a negative reaction to diphenylguanidine (Table 1). This is likely due to a synergistic, more immunogenic effect of the mixture compared to the individual components. Moreover, the patient reacted to s
一名63岁的特应性男子在即将进行的牙科手术前,由他的牙医转介到瑞典Malmö的职业和环境皮肤科,以确定他的接触性过敏。儿童时期的斑贴试验显示他对橡胶化学品有接触性过敏。后来,他开始组装橡胶装饰品,但由于严重的手部湿疹不得不停止工作。贴片试验采用瑞典基线系列、Malmö中使用的扩展基线系列、橡胶系列和牙科系列,咬合时间为48小时。第(D)3天和第7天的测试读数显示,碳水化合物混合物、硫脲混合物及其组分有强烈的阳性反应,对二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸锌和二丁基二硫代氨基甲酸锌有可疑反应(表1)。另外用从瑞典当地公共牙科服务处获得的两个橡胶牙坝进行了补片试验。两种牙坝(表1),一种基于天然胶乳(NRL)的(NRL)和一种不含天然胶乳的(NRL)均发现有阳性的斑贴试验反应。用商业乳胶提取物(solupile, ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm,丹麦)进行皮肤点刺试验,结果为阴性。用高效液相色谱(HPLC)对两个大坝进行化学分析,如b[2]之前所述,在无nrl的大坝中发现了二苯基胍(0.08 mg/cm2)和二乙基硫代氨基甲酸锌(0.04 mg/cm2)。在NRL-dam中检测到乙基苯基二硫代氨基甲酸锌(ZEPC) (0.01 mg/cm2)。通过与对照品的紫外光谱和色谱曲线下面积对比,确定了ZEPC的浓度和鉴别性。进一步用ZEPC (> 98.0%, TCI, Zweindrecht,比利时)在稀释系列中进行贴片试验,结果在凡士林中阳性反应低至0.01%。对照20例,凡士林0.1%和0.01%为阴性。在根管治疗过程中,建议使用橡胶支架(图1)隔离牙齿,防止微生物污染,避免误吸或摄入牙科材料[3,4]。在牙科手术中使用的NRL手套和橡胶坝有可能引起立即的过敏反应,这一点已经得到了承认。迄今为止,只有一例在使用橡胶坝后被怀疑和描述的延迟反应。此前有报道称,在接触含有ZEPC[7]的橡胶工作手套的患者中,ZEPC是引起过敏性接触性皮炎的原因。我们的患者对碳水化合物表现出强烈的(+++)斑贴试验反应,仅对二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸锌和二丁基二硫代氨基甲酸锌有可疑反应,对二苯基胍有阴性反应(表1)。这可能是由于与单个成分相比,混合物具有协同作用,更具有免疫原性。此外,患者与其他几种氨基甲酸酯发生反应,表明该化学组具有交叉反应性。这是第一个对橡胶化学品多重过敏的患者对两种橡胶坝的斑贴试验反应呈阳性的报告。化学分析显示,两个样本中均存在相关的橡胶接触过敏原。考虑到使用类型,它涉及到不同时期与皮肤和粘膜的接触,建议在橡胶过敏史的情况下使用由硅或乙烯基等替代材料制成的牙坝。病人同意发表。作者声明无利益冲突。支持本研究结果的数据可根据通讯作者的合理要求提供。
{"title":"Positive Patch Test Reactions to Dental Rubber Dams and Zinc Ethylphenyldithiocarbamate in a Patient Sensitised to Thiurams and Other Carbamates","authors":"Annarita Antelmi,&nbsp;Ellen Rydhög,&nbsp;Kevin Bertilsson,&nbsp;Ola Bergendorff","doi":"10.1111/cod.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70032","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;A 63-year-old atopic man was referred by his dentist to the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in Malmö, Sweden, before an upcoming dental procedure with intended use of rubber dams, to ascertain his contact allergies. Patch testing in childhood had revealed a contact allergy to rubber chemicals. He had later worked assembling rubber trims but had to stop due to severe hand eczema.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patch testing was performed with the Swedish baseline series, the extended baseline series used in Malmö, rubber series, and dental series with an occlusion time of 48 h. Test readings on day (D)3 and D7 [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;] showed strong positive reactions to carba mix, thiuram mix and its components, and doubtful reactions to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate and zinc dibutyldithiocarbamate (Table 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additional patch testing was performed with two exemplars of rubber dental dam acquired from the local Swedish Public Dental Service. Positive patch test reactions were found to both dental dams (Table 1), one natural rubber latex (NRL)-based (NRL) and one NRL-free. Skin prick tests with commercial latex extracts (Soluprick, ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark) turned out negative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A chemical analysis of both dams with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described before [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;] identified the presence of diphenylguanidine (0.08 mg/cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and zinc diethylthiocarbamate (0.04 mg/cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) in the NRL-free dam. Zinc ethylphenyldithiocarbamate (ZEPC) (0.01 mg/cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) was detected in the NRL-dam. The concentration and identity of ZEPC were determined by comparison with reference substances of UV spectrum and area under curve in the chromatogram.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further patch tests were performed with ZEPC (&gt; 98.0%, TCI, Zweindrecht, Belgium) in a dilution series resulting in positive reactions down to 0.01% in petrolatum. Twenty controls were tested negative to 0.1% and 0.01% in petrolatum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The use of rubber dams (Figure 1) during endodontic treatment is recommended to isolate the tooth, prevent microbial contamination, and avoid aspiration or ingestion of dental materials [&lt;span&gt;3, 4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The potential for NRL gloves and rubber dam used during dental procedures to be the cause of immediate allergic reactions has been acknowledged [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Hitherto only one case of delayed reaction following the use of rubber dam has been suspected and described [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. ZEPC has previously been reported as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis in a patient with exposure to rubber work gloves containing ZEPC [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our patient exhibited a strong (+++) patch test reaction to carba mix, with only doubtful reactions to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate and zinc dibutyldithiocarbamate, and a negative reaction to diphenylguanidine (Table 1). This is likely due to a synergistic, more immunogenic effect of the mixture compared to the individual components. Moreover, the patient reacted to s","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"92-94"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145079951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Octylisothiazolinone—A New Sensitizer in Over-Ear Headphones 一种新型耳戴式耳机增敏剂——辛基异噻唑啉酮。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70028
Blerand Berisha, Tina Lejding, Ola Bergendorff, Inese Hauksson

Background

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by isothiazolinones is a growing concern, particularly in consumer products. Octylisothiazolinone (OIT) is a potent sensitiser and commonly used as a preservative in rubbers, plastics and coatings, including those found in headphones. Despite increasing regulations on isothiazolinones in cosmetics, their presence in wearable devices remains under-recognised.

Aims

This investigation aims to identify OIT as a possible sensitiser in patients with presumed ACD due to over-ear headphones.

Methods

Two patients with presumed ACD due to over-ear headphones were patch tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö. Patch testing included Swedish baseline series, isothiazolinone compounds, and materials from headphones. To identify potential allergens, chemical analysis of components from headphones was conducted using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Results

Patch testing demonstrated strong positive reactions to OIT in both cases, with additional reactions to acetone extracts of artificial leather and blue plastic foam. OIT remained positive at dilutions as low as 0.00003%. Case 1 also showed positive reactions to MI/MCI. Chemical analysis confirmed OIT in both artificial leather (2.2 mg/g) and plastic foam (0.3 mg/g).

Conclusions

These findings contribute to the understanding of ACD by identifying OIT as a potential allergen in over-ear headphones. It calls for further research into the prevalence of OIT in consumer electronics and its role in sensitisation.

背景:异噻唑啉酮引起的过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)日益受到关注,特别是在消费品中。辛基利异噻唑啉酮(OIT)是一种强效致敏剂,通常用作橡胶、塑料和涂料的防腐剂,包括耳机中的防腐剂。尽管化妆品中的异噻唑啉酮法规越来越多,但它们在可穿戴设备中的存在仍未得到充分认识。目的:本研究的目的是确定OIT作为一个可能的致敏物,在患者推定的ACD由于戴耳式耳机。方法:在sk大学医院职业与环境皮肤科(Malmö)对2例推测为耳罩式耳机引起的ACD患者进行了贴片试验。贴片测试包括瑞典基线系列、异噻唑啉酮化合物和耳机材料。为了鉴定潜在的过敏原,采用高效液相色谱法对耳机成分进行化学分析。结果:斑贴试验表明,在这两种情况下,对OIT有强烈的积极反应,对人造皮革和蓝色塑料泡沫的丙酮提取物有额外的反应。在低至0.00003%的稀释度下,OIT仍为正。病例1也显示MI/MCI阳性反应。化学分析证实,人造皮革(2.2 mg/g)和塑料泡沫(0.3 mg/g)中都含有油脂。结论:这些发现有助于通过确定OIT作为耳罩式耳机中的潜在过敏原来理解ACD。它呼吁进一步研究OIT在消费电子产品中的流行程度及其在致敏中的作用。
{"title":"Octylisothiazolinone—A New Sensitizer in Over-Ear Headphones","authors":"Blerand Berisha,&nbsp;Tina Lejding,&nbsp;Ola Bergendorff,&nbsp;Inese Hauksson","doi":"10.1111/cod.70028","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by isothiazolinones is a growing concern, particularly in consumer products. Octylisothiazolinone (OIT) is a potent sensitiser and commonly used as a preservative in rubbers, plastics and coatings, including those found in headphones. Despite increasing regulations on isothiazolinones in cosmetics, their presence in wearable devices remains under-recognised.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aims</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This investigation aims to identify OIT as a possible sensitiser in patients with presumed ACD due to over-ear headphones.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two patients with presumed ACD due to over-ear headphones were patch tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö. Patch testing included Swedish baseline series, isothiazolinone compounds, and materials from headphones. To identify potential allergens, chemical analysis of components from headphones was conducted using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patch testing demonstrated strong positive reactions to OIT in both cases, with additional reactions to acetone extracts of artificial leather and blue plastic foam. OIT remained positive at dilutions as low as 0.00003%. Case 1 also showed positive reactions to MI/MCI. Chemical analysis confirmed OIT in both artificial leather (2.2 mg/g) and plastic foam (0.3 mg/g).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These findings contribute to the understanding of ACD by identifying OIT as a potential allergen in over-ear headphones. It calls for further research into the prevalence of OIT in consumer electronics and its role in sensitisation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145052108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unveiling the Chemical Safety of Clothing Articles, Textiles and Footwear With Regard to the Presence of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, or Reprotoxic Substances, Endocrine Disruptors and Skin Sensitizers Under EU Regulatory Restrictions 在欧盟法规限制下,就致癌、诱变或生殖毒性物质、内分泌干扰物和皮肤致敏剂的存在,公布服装、纺织品和鞋类的化学安全性。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70026
Roberta Lavalle, Manuela Agnello, Roberto Mua, Marco Fontana, Barbara Cravello, Marco Piu, Federica Panico, Raffaella Cresti, Ida Marcello, Leonello Attias, Carolina Ferranti, Luca Palleschi, Lucilla Baldassarri, Rosa Draisci, Marco Famele

Objectives

To assess the occurrence of carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic substances (CMRs), endocrine disruptors, and skin sensitizers (i.e., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalates, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), bisphenols, isocyanates, isothiazolinones) in textiles, footwear, and clothing under in-force or proposed EU restrictions, and to evaluate exposure and risks for consumers related to bisphenols.

Materials and Methods

111 items from the Italian market or online were tested by gas or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.

Results

63% of the samples contained the investigated substances: 24% would exceed the proposed concentration limit for bisphenols under Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH); 19% could represent a significant source of exposure to phthalates and PAHs for consumers due to non-compliance with REACH; 7% contained octylisothiazolinone above the limit proposed to protect from skin sensitisation. Isocyanates and PFAS were quantified within concentration limits proposed or set by REACH and Regulation (EU) No. 2019/1021. No risks for consumers were related to the presence of bisphenols.

Conclusions

Safety of clothing articles, textiles, and footwear, especially from online market, would be significantly impacted by the presence of CMRs and environmental endocrine disruptors (i.e., phthalates, PAHs, bisphenols), highlighting the need for enforcement of EU controls and reduced use of harmful chemicals by manufacturers.

目的:评估欧盟现行或拟议限制下纺织品、鞋类和服装中致癌、致突变和生殖毒性物质(cmr)、内分泌干扰物和皮肤致敏物质(即多环芳烃(PAHs)、邻苯二甲酸酯、全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)、双酚、异氰酸酯、异噻唑啉酮)的发生率,并评估与双酚相关的消费者暴露和风险。材料和方法:采用气相色谱或液相色谱质谱法对意大利市场或网上的111种产品进行检测。结果:63%的样品含有被调查物质:24%的样品超过法规(EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)规定的双酚类建议浓度限值;由于不符合REACH法规,19%可能是消费者接触邻苯二甲酸盐和多环芳烃的重要来源;7%的产品含有辛基利异噻唑啉酮,超过了防止皮肤致敏的建议限值。异氰酸酯和PFAS在REACH和法规(EU) No 2019/1021提出或设定的浓度限值内进行了定量。双酚类物质的存在对消费者没有风险。结论:服装、纺织品和鞋类的安全性,特别是来自在线市场的产品,将受到cmr和环境内分泌干扰物(即邻苯二甲酸盐、多环芳烃、双酚类)存在的显著影响,这突出了执行欧盟控制和减少制造商使用有害化学物质的必要性。
{"title":"Unveiling the Chemical Safety of Clothing Articles, Textiles and Footwear With Regard to the Presence of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, or Reprotoxic Substances, Endocrine Disruptors and Skin Sensitizers Under EU Regulatory Restrictions","authors":"Roberta Lavalle,&nbsp;Manuela Agnello,&nbsp;Roberto Mua,&nbsp;Marco Fontana,&nbsp;Barbara Cravello,&nbsp;Marco Piu,&nbsp;Federica Panico,&nbsp;Raffaella Cresti,&nbsp;Ida Marcello,&nbsp;Leonello Attias,&nbsp;Carolina Ferranti,&nbsp;Luca Palleschi,&nbsp;Lucilla Baldassarri,&nbsp;Rosa Draisci,&nbsp;Marco Famele","doi":"10.1111/cod.70026","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the occurrence of carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic substances (CMRs), endocrine disruptors, and skin sensitizers (i.e., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalates, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), bisphenols, isocyanates, isothiazolinones) in textiles, footwear, and clothing under in-force or proposed EU restrictions, and to evaluate exposure and risks for consumers related to bisphenols.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>111 items from the Italian market or online were tested by gas or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>63% of the samples contained the investigated substances: 24% would exceed the proposed concentration limit for bisphenols under Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH); 19% could represent a significant source of exposure to phthalates and PAHs for consumers due to non-compliance with REACH; 7% contained octylisothiazolinone above the limit proposed to protect from skin sensitisation. Isocyanates and PFAS were quantified within concentration limits proposed or set by REACH and Regulation (EU) No. 2019/1021. No risks for consumers were related to the presence of bisphenols.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Safety of clothing articles, textiles, and footwear, especially from online market, would be significantly impacted by the presence of CMRs and environmental endocrine disruptors (i.e., phthalates, PAHs, bisphenols), highlighting the need for enforcement of EU controls and reduced use of harmful chemicals by manufacturers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"93 6","pages":"477-489"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145052127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Susceptibility in the Association Between Exposures and Occupational Contact Dermatitis: A Scoping Review 暴露与职业性接触性皮炎之间易感性的作用:一项范围综述。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70030
Renate Juścikowski, Pieter Coenen, Sanja Kezic, Damien M. McElvenny, Faridi S. Jamaludin, Henk F. van der Molen, Jan L. Hoving

The objective of this review is to identify individual susceptibility factors and determine their role in the association between work-related exposures and contact dermatitis (CD). A scoping review was conducted using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL. Cohort and case-control studies were included for all types of CD, and cross-sectional studies for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). In the absence of meta-analysis, we drew qualitative inferences summarising the findings. Twenty-one studies, primarily cross-sectional (n = 18), investigated how 44 individual susceptibility factors influenced associations between 53 work-related exposures (from six exposure categories) and CD. These factors were grouped into five categories: demographic, socioeconomic, host-related intrinsic factors, lifestyle, and exposures outside work. The factors variously mitigated, amplified, or had no effect on the exposure-CD association. The role of individual susceptibility factors in work-related exposure-CD associations remains underexplored and inconclusive. Determining their individual contributions is challenging, as studies often adjust for multiple factors, with inconsistent influence on the association. Age, sex, atopic history, hand eczema, smoking, and ethnicity may influence CD risk and should be considered in studies examining work-related exposure-CD associations. Further research is needed to clarify the role of individual susceptibility factors and guide effective prevention strategies for occupational CD.

本综述的目的是确定个体易感因素,并确定其在工作暴露与接触性皮炎(CD)之间的关系中的作用。使用Medline、Embase和CINAHL进行范围审查。包括所有类型CD的队列和病例对照研究,以及过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的横断面研究。在缺乏荟萃分析的情况下,我们对研究结果进行了定性推断。21项研究,主要是横断面研究(n = 18),调查了44个个体易感因素如何影响53个与工作相关的暴露(来自6个暴露类别)与CD之间的关联。这些因素被分为5类:人口统计学、社会经济、宿主相关的内在因素、生活方式和工作外暴露。这些因素不同程度地减轻、放大或没有影响暴露与cd的关联。个体易感因素在与工作有关的暴露与cd关联中的作用仍未得到充分探讨和定论。确定他们的个人贡献是具有挑战性的,因为研究经常调整多种因素,对关联的影响不一致。年龄、性别、特应性史、手部湿疹、吸烟和种族可能影响乳糜泻的风险,在检查与工作有关的暴露与乳糜泻的关系的研究中应予以考虑。需要进一步研究明确个体易感因素的作用,指导有效的职业性CD预防策略。
{"title":"The Role of Susceptibility in the Association Between Exposures and Occupational Contact Dermatitis: A Scoping Review","authors":"Renate Juścikowski,&nbsp;Pieter Coenen,&nbsp;Sanja Kezic,&nbsp;Damien M. McElvenny,&nbsp;Faridi S. Jamaludin,&nbsp;Henk F. van der Molen,&nbsp;Jan L. Hoving","doi":"10.1111/cod.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this review is to identify individual susceptibility factors and determine their role in the association between work-related exposures and contact dermatitis (CD). A scoping review was conducted using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL. Cohort and case-control studies were included for all types of CD, and cross-sectional studies for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). In the absence of meta-analysis, we drew qualitative inferences summarising the findings. Twenty-one studies, primarily cross-sectional (<i>n</i> = 18), investigated how 44 individual susceptibility factors influenced associations between 53 work-related exposures (from six exposure categories) and CD. These factors were grouped into five categories: demographic, socioeconomic, host-related intrinsic factors, lifestyle, and exposures outside work. The factors variously mitigated, amplified, or had no effect on the exposure-CD association. The role of individual susceptibility factors in work-related exposure-CD associations remains underexplored and inconclusive. Determining their individual contributions is challenging, as studies often adjust for multiple factors, with inconsistent influence on the association. Age, sex, atopic history, hand eczema, smoking, and ethnicity may influence CD risk and should be considered in studies examining work-related exposure-CD associations. Further research is needed to clarify the role of individual susceptibility factors and guide effective prevention strategies for occupational CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145039300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moisturising Gloves as a Solution for Occupational Skin Health: Advances and Challenges 保湿手套作为职业皮肤健康的解决方案:进步和挑战。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70025
Sher Wei How, Janarthanan Supramaniam, Thet Thet Htar, Bey Fen Leo, Sivakumar Manickam, Bey Hing Goh, Siah Ying Tang

Extended glove usage is crucial in various occupational settings to safeguard workers and maintain hygiene standards. However, prolonged wear creates an occlusive environment that disrupts normal skin evaporation, leading to temporary overhydration. This reversal of the diffusion gradient facilitates the penetration of residual soaps and alcohol from hand hygiene practices, which can deplete skin moisture and cause irritation. Moisturising agents have been integrated into gloves to address occupational dry skin, as conventional lotions often suffer from low compliance and incompatibility with latex. Their selection requires careful optimisation to ensure effective skin penetration without compromising glove integrity or introducing manufacturing complexities. Additionally, variations in activation stimuli among individuals must be taken into account to ensure consistent efficacy. This review discusses advancements in moisturising glove technologies, including interlayer coatings, direct surface applications, matrix integration, microencapsulation and hydrogel-based controlled-release systems. Despite these innovations, research gaps remain in standardising hydration assessment methods, evaluating real-world performance and comparing the efficacy of moisturising gloves with conventional skincare methods. Addressing these challenges through further clinical studies is crucial for refining the design and effectiveness of moisturising gloves in occupational applications.

延长手套的使用是至关重要的,在各种职业设置,以保护工人和保持卫生标准。然而,长时间的佩戴造成了一个闭塞的环境,破坏了正常的皮肤蒸发,导致暂时的水合过度。这种扩散梯度的逆转有利于手卫生习惯中残留的肥皂和酒精的渗透,这会耗尽皮肤水分并引起刺激。保湿剂已被整合到手套中,以解决职业性皮肤干燥问题,因为传统的乳液通常具有低依从性和与乳胶不相容的问题。它们的选择需要仔细优化,以确保有效的皮肤渗透,而不会损害手套的完整性或引入制造复杂性。此外,必须考虑个体之间激活刺激的差异,以确保一致的疗效。本文综述了保湿手套技术的进展,包括层间涂层、直接表面应用、基质集成、微胶囊化和基于水凝胶的控释系统。尽管有这些创新,但在标准化水合作用评估方法、评估实际性能以及将保湿手套与传统护肤方法的功效进行比较方面,研究差距仍然存在。通过进一步的临床研究来解决这些挑战对于改进职业应用中保湿手套的设计和有效性至关重要。
{"title":"Moisturising Gloves as a Solution for Occupational Skin Health: Advances and Challenges","authors":"Sher Wei How,&nbsp;Janarthanan Supramaniam,&nbsp;Thet Thet Htar,&nbsp;Bey Fen Leo,&nbsp;Sivakumar Manickam,&nbsp;Bey Hing Goh,&nbsp;Siah Ying Tang","doi":"10.1111/cod.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extended glove usage is crucial in various occupational settings to safeguard workers and maintain hygiene standards. However, prolonged wear creates an occlusive environment that disrupts normal skin evaporation, leading to temporary overhydration. This reversal of the diffusion gradient facilitates the penetration of residual soaps and alcohol from hand hygiene practices, which can deplete skin moisture and cause irritation. Moisturising agents have been integrated into gloves to address occupational dry skin, as conventional lotions often suffer from low compliance and incompatibility with latex. Their selection requires careful optimisation to ensure effective skin penetration without compromising glove integrity or introducing manufacturing complexities. Additionally, variations in activation stimuli among individuals must be taken into account to ensure consistent efficacy. This review discusses advancements in moisturising glove technologies, including interlayer coatings, direct surface applications, matrix integration, microencapsulation and hydrogel-based controlled-release systems. Despite these innovations, research gaps remain in standardising hydration assessment methods, evaluating real-world performance and comparing the efficacy of moisturising gloves with conventional skincare methods. Addressing these challenges through further clinical studies is crucial for refining the design and effectiveness of moisturising gloves in occupational applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"93 6","pages":"464-476"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145029071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patch Testing Confirms Clindamycin-Induced Acute Generalised Exanthematous Pustulosis: A Case Report 贴片试验证实克林霉素引起的急性全身性红斑性脓疱病1例。
IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/cod.70029
Carmen Cánovas Seva, Carmen Paredes-Suárez, Ana Batalla, Ángeles Flórez
{"title":"Patch Testing Confirms Clindamycin-Induced Acute Generalised Exanthematous Pustulosis: A Case Report","authors":"Carmen Cánovas Seva,&nbsp;Carmen Paredes-Suárez,&nbsp;Ana Batalla,&nbsp;Ángeles Flórez","doi":"10.1111/cod.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cod.70029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"94 1","pages":"83-85"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145029024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Contact Dermatitis
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1