Objective: Observational studies have suggested an association between chronic periodontitis (CP) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to determine whether there is a causal relationship between CP and COPD incidence.
Design: Two‑sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis using summary statistics from two genome‑wide association studies (GWASs) of European ancestry. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COPD were obtained from the FinnGen database, which included 16,380,382 SNPs. The diagnosis of COPD was based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2023). We also obtained SNPs associated with CP from the FinnGen database, which included 16,380,378 SNPs.
Results: Sixteen eligible SNPs were extracted to analyze the causal effect of CP on COPD incidence. There was no causal correlation between CP and COPD using the inverse variance-weighted method (IVW) (OR=0.97, 95%CI= 0.91-1.05; p=0.482). Seven eligible SNPs were extracted to analyze the causal effect of COPD on CP incidence. Again, there was also no causal correlation between using IVW (OR=1.09, 95%CI=0.93-1.28; p=0.279).
Conclusion: We did not demonstrate a causal relationship between genetically predicted CP and COPD, or between genetically predicted COPD and CP.
{"title":"Periodontitis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"M Chen, S Chang, Y Xu, L Zhang, H Guo, J Liu","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00036Chen06","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00036Chen06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Observational studies have suggested an association between chronic periodontitis (CP) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to determine whether there is a causal relationship between CP and COPD incidence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two‑sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis using summary statistics from two genome‑wide association studies (GWASs) of European ancestry. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COPD were obtained from the FinnGen database, which included 16,380,382 SNPs. The diagnosis of COPD was based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2023). We also obtained SNPs associated with CP from the FinnGen database, which included 16,380,378 SNPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen eligible SNPs were extracted to analyze the causal effect of CP on COPD incidence. There was no causal correlation between CP and COPD using the inverse variance-weighted method (IVW) (OR=0.97, 95%CI= 0.91-1.05; p=0.482). Seven eligible SNPs were extracted to analyze the causal effect of COPD on CP incidence. Again, there was also no causal correlation between using IVW (OR=1.09, 95%CI=0.93-1.28; p=0.279).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not demonstrate a causal relationship between genetically predicted CP and COPD, or between genetically predicted COPD and CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00107Kouassi07
S M Kouassi, C C Salomon-Ibarra, M T Hosey, J E Gallagher
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of preventive interventions in children who have undergone caries-related dental extractions.
Methods: Rapid review across five databases (CENTRAL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus). Quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool.
Results: Five studies were included, all randomised controlled trials involving pre-and/or post-extractions activity. Three studies involved oral health education (computer game, motivational interviewing, visual aids), one delivered clinical prevention (fissure sealants), and one an enhanced prevention programme combining additional health education and a clinical intervention (fluoride varnish). Retention was mixed (55%-80% in the intervention groups). Of the three studies measuring caries, all reported less caries development in the test group. However, only a study involving a dental nurse-delivered structured conversation, informed by motivational interviewing, showed an improvement in oral health. Two studies reporting on plaque and gingival bleeding had conflicting results. A study reporting on subsequent dental attendance did not demonstrate a clear improvement.
Conclusion: Few published studies have explored prevention-based interventions in high caries-risk children requiring dental extractions. Whilst evidence of clinical benefit of preventive interventions in this population is limited, the potential use of contemporary behaviour change techniques appears promising. There is an urgent need for more high-quality longer-term trials using contemporary methodologies.
目的确定对接受过龋齿相关拔牙手术的儿童采取预防性干预措施的有效性:快速查阅五个数据库(CENTRAL、Ovid Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus)。采用 Risk of Bias 2 工具对研究质量进行评估:共纳入五项研究,均为随机对照试验,涉及拔牙前和/或拔牙后的活动。其中三项研究涉及口腔健康教育(电脑游戏、动机访谈、视觉辅助工具),一项研究提供临床预防(窝沟封闭),还有一项研究是结合了额外健康教育和临床干预(涂氟)的强化预防计划。保留率参差不齐(干预组为 55%-80%)。在三项测量龋齿的研究中,所有研究都报告称试验组的龋齿发展较少。然而,只有一项涉及牙科护士提供的结构化谈话的研究显示,口腔健康有所改善。两项关于牙菌斑和牙龈出血的研究结果相互矛盾。一项关于后续牙科就诊情况的研究也没有显示出明显的改善:很少有公开发表的研究对需要拔牙的龋齿高危儿童进行预防性干预。虽然在这一人群中采取预防性干预措施的临床获益证据有限,但当代行为改变技术的潜在用途似乎很有前景。目前迫切需要使用现代方法进行更多高质量的长期试验。
{"title":"Effectiveness of preventive intervention programmes aiming to improve oral health in children who have undergone caries-related dental extractions: a rapid review.","authors":"S M Kouassi, C C Salomon-Ibarra, M T Hosey, J E Gallagher","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00107Kouassi07","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00107Kouassi07","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of preventive interventions in children who have undergone caries-related dental extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rapid review across five databases (CENTRAL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus). Quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included, all randomised controlled trials involving pre-and/or post-extractions activity. Three studies involved oral health education (computer game, motivational interviewing, visual aids), one delivered clinical prevention (fissure sealants), and one an enhanced prevention programme combining additional health education and a clinical intervention (fluoride varnish). Retention was mixed (55%-80% in the intervention groups). Of the three studies measuring caries, all reported less caries development in the test group. However, only a study involving a dental nurse-delivered structured conversation, informed by motivational interviewing, showed an improvement in oral health. Two studies reporting on plaque and gingival bleeding had conflicting results. A study reporting on subsequent dental attendance did not demonstrate a clear improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few published studies have explored prevention-based interventions in high caries-risk children requiring dental extractions. Whilst evidence of clinical benefit of preventive interventions in this population is limited, the potential use of contemporary behaviour change techniques appears promising. There is an urgent need for more high-quality longer-term trials using contemporary methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141893085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00083Queiroz06
A C Queiroz, F J Herkrath, A R Araújo, C V Smith, A P C Q Herkrath
Objectives: To determine the association between smoking and tooth loss in individuals aged 18 years or more living in Brazil.
Methods: Secondary analysis of the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey data. The outcome was self-reported tooth loss, and the main independent variable was tobacco smoking. Family income, schooling, sex and age were covariates. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the association between tobacco smoking and the number of missing teeth and then the average number of missing teeth was predicted according to smoking status.
Results: The mean number of missing teeth in 88,531 individuals aged 18 or more was 7.7 (95%CI: 7.6-7.8). At least one missing tooth was identified in 72.0% (95%CI: 71.4-72.6) of the population, 21.3% (95%CI: 20.9-21.7) had a non-functional dentition, 14.2% (95%CI: 13.9-14.6) had severe tooth loss and 10.3% (95%CI: 10.0-10.6) were edentulous. The adjusted regression coefficients for number of missing teeth showed that current or former smokers, individuals with low family income and schooling, older age and females exhibited higher tooth loss. Current and former smokers had 1.40 (95%CI: 1.35-1.46) and 1.13 (95%CI: 0.54-0.98) times more lost teeth than never smokers, respectively.
Conclusions: Both tooth loss and smoking are common in Brazilians and are associated. Unfavorable socioeconomic status and demographic factors also predict tooth loss.
{"title":"Tobacco smoking and tooth loss in adults and elderly in Brazil: a populational-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"A C Queiroz, F J Herkrath, A R Araújo, C V Smith, A P C Q Herkrath","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00083Queiroz06","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00083Queiroz06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the association between smoking and tooth loss in individuals aged 18 years or more living in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey data. The outcome was self-reported tooth loss, and the main independent variable was tobacco smoking. Family income, schooling, sex and age were covariates. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the association between tobacco smoking and the number of missing teeth and then the average number of missing teeth was predicted according to smoking status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of missing teeth in 88,531 individuals aged 18 or more was 7.7 (95%CI: 7.6-7.8). At least one missing tooth was identified in 72.0% (95%CI: 71.4-72.6) of the population, 21.3% (95%CI: 20.9-21.7) had a non-functional dentition, 14.2% (95%CI: 13.9-14.6) had severe tooth loss and 10.3% (95%CI: 10.0-10.6) were edentulous. The adjusted regression coefficients for number of missing teeth showed that current or former smokers, individuals with low family income and schooling, older age and females exhibited higher tooth loss. Current and former smokers had 1.40 (95%CI: 1.35-1.46) and 1.13 (95%CI: 0.54-0.98) times more lost teeth than never smokers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both tooth loss and smoking are common in Brazilians and are associated. Unfavorable socioeconomic status and demographic factors also predict tooth loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"183-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Adults who have learning disabilities are a vulnerable group, little is known about their oral health and how this affects their quality of life. The aims of this secondary analysis of data from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey (ADHS) were to describe the oral health status of adults with learning disabilities, determine if severity of learning disability is associated with oral health and identify some of the methodological complexities of working with this population. The survey yields the most recent representative data on the oral health of adults with learning disabilities in England and importantly, contains information about oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL).
Basic research design: Secondary analysis of data from a supplemental survey of adults with learning disabilities collected alongside the 2009 ADHS.
Participants: 607 participants with a diagnosed learning disability aged 18 years and over.
Results: Adults with learning disabilities had similar levels of active dental caries, fewer natural teeth, and fewer fillings than comparable participants from the general population. Self-reported oral and general health were worse for adults with learning disabilities than the general population. Possible associations between the severity of learning disability and the numbers of decayed, missing or filled teeth were identified. However, large amounts of missing data limited the analysis.
Conclusions: There are important questions relating to the accessibility of existing self-reported oral health questionnaires and the reliability of proxy-reported questions about OHRQoL that should be addressed to give a fuller picture of the oral health of adults with learning disabilities.
{"title":"The oral health of adults with learning disabilities: A secondary analysis of the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009.","authors":"J Bird, Z Marshman, K Jones, S R Baker","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00251Bird06","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00251Bird06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adults who have learning disabilities are a vulnerable group, little is known about their oral health and how this affects their quality of life. The aims of this secondary analysis of data from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey (ADHS) were to describe the oral health status of adults with learning disabilities, determine if severity of learning disability is associated with oral health and identify some of the methodological complexities of working with this population. The survey yields the most recent representative data on the oral health of adults with learning disabilities in England and importantly, contains information about oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL).</p><p><strong>Basic research design: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from a supplemental survey of adults with learning disabilities collected alongside the 2009 ADHS.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>607 participants with a diagnosed learning disability aged 18 years and over.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults with learning disabilities had similar levels of active dental caries, fewer natural teeth, and fewer fillings than comparable participants from the general population. Self-reported oral and general health were worse for adults with learning disabilities than the general population. Possible associations between the severity of learning disability and the numbers of decayed, missing or filled teeth were identified. However, large amounts of missing data limited the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are important questions relating to the accessibility of existing self-reported oral health questionnaires and the reliability of proxy-reported questions about OHRQoL that should be addressed to give a fuller picture of the oral health of adults with learning disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139905233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00190Menezes06
T D S Menezes, M M Martini, M Lotto, A M Jucá, O S Jorge, A Cruvinel, T Cruvinel
Objective: Social media is a platform for sharing views on aspects of life, including oral health. This study aimed to characterize Facebook posts related to toothache information.
Methods: Two independent investigators retrieved 500 English-language posts with the highest level of interaction using CrowdTangleTM and analyzed their facticity, motivation, author's profile, content, sentiment, and type of post. Data were analysed descriptively and using Pearson's Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and multiple logistic regression models.
Results: Most posts were produced by regular users and were not financially motivated, although commercial posts had significantly higher total interaction among users. While link- or video-containing posts (OR = 1.66) and posts with positive sentiments (OR = 1.53) were associated with users' total interaction, older (OR = 1.81) and link- or video-containing posts (OR = 2.04) were associated with overperforming scores. Misinformation was positively associated with financial motivation (OR = 2.03) and positive sentiments (OR = 3.79).
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of addressing the spread of misinformation related to oral health on social media and taking steps to ensure that accurate and reliable information is readily available. Toothache-related misinformation was associated with positive sentiments and financial motivation. Links, videos, and positive sentiments awakened greater user engagements with toothache-related posts.
{"title":"Untangling the truth: User engagement with misinformation in toothache-related Facebook posts.","authors":"T D S Menezes, M M Martini, M Lotto, A M Jucá, O S Jorge, A Cruvinel, T Cruvinel","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00190Menezes06","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00190Menezes06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social media is a platform for sharing views on aspects of life, including oral health. This study aimed to characterize Facebook posts related to toothache information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent investigators retrieved 500 English-language posts with the highest level of interaction using CrowdTangleTM and analyzed their facticity, motivation, author's profile, content, sentiment, and type of post. Data were analysed descriptively and using Pearson's Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and multiple logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most posts were produced by regular users and were not financially motivated, although commercial posts had significantly higher total interaction among users. While link- or video-containing posts (OR = 1.66) and posts with positive sentiments (OR = 1.53) were associated with users' total interaction, older (OR = 1.81) and link- or video-containing posts (OR = 2.04) were associated with overperforming scores. Misinformation was positively associated with financial motivation (OR = 2.03) and positive sentiments (OR = 3.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of addressing the spread of misinformation related to oral health on social media and taking steps to ensure that accurate and reliable information is readily available. Toothache-related misinformation was associated with positive sentiments and financial motivation. Links, videos, and positive sentiments awakened greater user engagements with toothache-related posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"128-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140849581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00024Bhadauria06
U S Bhadauria, A Bhukal, B Purohit, H Priya
Objective: The family environment influences oral health conditions and the utilization of dental services. The emotional link between the family members and the degree to which they are resilient and close to each other is represented as family cohesion and adaptability. This systematic review critically appraises and synthesizes existing evidence on the effect of family cohesion on oral health predictors in children and adolescents.
Methods: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023453608). Databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched in September 2023. No restriction of time frame was allowed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.
Results: Initially, 272 records were identified from PubMed (133), Embase (122) and Scopus (10) databases and other sources, finally leading to 12 cross-sectional studies to be included. Eleven studies were carried out in Brazil and one in USA. Only one study reported moderate risk, whereas the others all reported low risk of bias. The studies were carried out from 2013-2023. The frequency of dental visits, oral health literacy, and self-perceived need for dental treatment were reported to be higher in families with the better cohesive ties. An inconsistent direct association was reported between dental caries and family cohesion.
Conclusions: Family dynamics are important in shaping oral health behaviors and outcomes during a pivotal phase of development. Further exploration through longitudinal studies in this field can elucidate causal pathways and potential moderators.
{"title":"Effect of family cohesion on oral health predictors in children and adolescents: A systematic review.","authors":"U S Bhadauria, A Bhukal, B Purohit, H Priya","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00024Bhadauria06","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00024Bhadauria06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The family environment influences oral health conditions and the utilization of dental services. The emotional link between the family members and the degree to which they are resilient and close to each other is represented as family cohesion and adaptability. This systematic review critically appraises and synthesizes existing evidence on the effect of family cohesion on oral health predictors in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023453608). Databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched in September 2023. No restriction of time frame was allowed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 272 records were identified from PubMed (133), Embase (122) and Scopus (10) databases and other sources, finally leading to 12 cross-sectional studies to be included. Eleven studies were carried out in Brazil and one in USA. Only one study reported moderate risk, whereas the others all reported low risk of bias. The studies were carried out from 2013-2023. The frequency of dental visits, oral health literacy, and self-perceived need for dental treatment were reported to be higher in families with the better cohesive ties. An inconsistent direct association was reported between dental caries and family cohesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family dynamics are important in shaping oral health behaviors and outcomes during a pivotal phase of development. Further exploration through longitudinal studies in this field can elucidate causal pathways and potential moderators.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"134-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00239Oliveira05
Leandro M Oliveira, Thayná R Pelissari
Objective: To determine whether different alcohol intake dimensions: average alcohol volume consumed (AVC), binge drinking (BD), and alcohol-related consequences (ARC) are associated with self-rated oral health (SROH).
Methods: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of The Brazilian National Health Survey of 2019 data. BD was considered when an individual reported a past-month heavy drinking episode. ARC referred to experiences such as past-year blackouts, concerns from others, or failure in routine activities. Adjusted multivariate Poisson regression models with robust variance were employed to calculate the prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of SROH across the entire sample and stratified by sex and age.
Results: The sample comprised 88,531 participants aged 18 years or older. Individuals experiencing at least one past-year ARC had an 11% (95% CI: 1.07, 1.15) higher prevalence of poor SROH than their abstainers' counterparts. Associations were more pronounced among men aged less than 50 (PR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.15) and women aged 50 years or more (PR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.30).
Conclusion: Alcohol-related consequences predicted poor SROH. Oral health inquiries should include the screening for ARC in addition to traditional measurements of AVC or BD, since such exposures may not fully capture the role of alcohol on oral health impairment.
{"title":"Adverse alcohol use and oral health.","authors":"Leandro M Oliveira, Thayná R Pelissari","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00239Oliveira05","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00239Oliveira05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether different alcohol intake dimensions: average alcohol volume consumed (AVC), binge drinking (BD), and alcohol-related consequences (ARC) are associated with self-rated oral health (SROH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary cross-sectional analysis of The Brazilian National Health Survey of 2019 data. BD was considered when an individual reported a past-month heavy drinking episode. ARC referred to experiences such as past-year blackouts, concerns from others, or failure in routine activities. Adjusted multivariate Poisson regression models with robust variance were employed to calculate the prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of SROH across the entire sample and stratified by sex and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 88,531 participants aged 18 years or older. Individuals experiencing at least one past-year ARC had an 11% (95% CI: 1.07, 1.15) higher prevalence of poor SROH than their abstainers' counterparts. Associations were more pronounced among men aged less than 50 (PR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.15) and women aged 50 years or more (PR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alcohol-related consequences predicted poor SROH. Oral health inquiries should include the screening for ARC in addition to traditional measurements of AVC or BD, since such exposures may not fully capture the role of alcohol on oral health impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139416576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00248DPHRaison
H Raison, H Parsley, E Hall-Scullen, Y Dailey, M Cronin
Initial impetus for action: Oral health is not equitably distributed. More deprived areas experience appreciably worse oral health outcomes. Oral health improvement programmes in Local Authorities (LA) seek to reduce these inequalities but have diminished in recent years following the COVID-19 pandemic. LAs have also endured funding cuts to public health budgets, placing a greater emphasis on the need for establishing a clear prioritisation matrix for oral health improvement interventions. Solution: A prioritisation matrix that considered both the importance and do-ability of oral health improvement interventions was developed. Both are composite measures. The importance comprised evidence of benefit, impact on inequalities, alignment with national/local priorities and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The do-ability considered the available support from stakeholders, building/equipment requirements, workforce issues and investment funding. A working group was necessary to inform the do-ability aspect of the prioritisation matrix. Scores were assigned to each criterion, the sum of the scores informed whether the intervention was eliminated, aspirational or implemented based on predetermined thresholds. Outcome: The prioritisation matrix ensured a transparent and systematic approach for intervention selection, which reflected local resources and priorities. Moreover, this tool should help ensure the most effective, equitable, practical and sustainable interventions are chosen having the greatest impact on improving oral health outcomes.
{"title":"IDEA tool: Establishing a prioritisation matrix for oral health improvement interventions.","authors":"H Raison, H Parsley, E Hall-Scullen, Y Dailey, M Cronin","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00248DPHRaison","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00248DPHRaison","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Initial impetus for action: Oral health is not equitably distributed. More deprived areas experience appreciably worse oral health outcomes. Oral health improvement programmes in Local Authorities (LA) seek to reduce these inequalities but have diminished in recent years following the COVID-19 pandemic. LAs have also endured funding cuts to public health budgets, placing a greater emphasis on the need for establishing a clear prioritisation matrix for oral health improvement interventions. Solution: A prioritisation matrix that considered both the importance and do-ability of oral health improvement interventions was developed. Both are composite measures. The importance comprised evidence of benefit, impact on inequalities, alignment with national/local priorities and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The do-ability considered the available support from stakeholders, building/equipment requirements, workforce issues and investment funding. A working group was necessary to inform the do-ability aspect of the prioritisation matrix. Scores were assigned to each criterion, the sum of the scores informed whether the intervention was eliminated, aspirational or implemented based on predetermined thresholds. Outcome: The prioritisation matrix ensured a transparent and systematic approach for intervention selection, which reflected local resources and priorities. Moreover, this tool should help ensure the most effective, equitable, practical and sustainable interventions are chosen having the greatest impact on improving oral health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00267Hilasaca-Mamani06
M Hilasaca-Mamani, J N Amato, E Eskenazi, M B Gavião, E O Ribeiro, D S Araujo, P M Castelo
Objective: To determine the association between caries experience, obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental factors in 2, 5 and 12 years-old schoolchildren. Secondarily, the influence of school infrastructure was assessed.
Methods: Primary data from 1762 schoolchildren from the municipality of Cajamar (SP, Brazil) and socioeconomic and environmental secondary data (Brazilian Census 2010, School Census, Prova Brasil/2017) were used. Caries and treatment experience (dmft/DMFT indices), dental occlusion, visible biofilm, weight and height were assessed.
Results: Caries experience was found in 6.5%, 40.2% and 46.5% of children at 2, 5 and 12 years, respectively. At 12y, greater caries experience was observed among children financially assisted by the Bolsa Família governmental program. Excess weight was found in 30%, 35% and 34% at 2, 5 and 12 years. At 2 and 5 years, the highest dental caries indices were associated with disadvantageous socioeconomic indicators (households water supply and sewage system, garbage collection, literate head and income), while overweight was associated with female sex and better socioeconomic aspects. At 12y, the group with obesity was characterized by low dmf+DMFT index and better household aspects, while the group with greater dmf+DMFT index comprised normal-weight children. A correlation between the percentage of caries experience and student/employee ratio of the school was observed.
Conclusion: An association between disadvantageous socioeconomic and environmental aspects and dental caries was observed, while obesity was associated with better socioeconomic status of the schoolchildren. While no direct association was found between obesity and dental caries, the results emphasize the influence of socioeconomic/environmental variables on health outcomes.
{"title":"Caries experience, obesity and demographic factors in school children: A cluster analysis.","authors":"M Hilasaca-Mamani, J N Amato, E Eskenazi, M B Gavião, E O Ribeiro, D S Araujo, P M Castelo","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00267Hilasaca-Mamani06","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00267Hilasaca-Mamani06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between caries experience, obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental factors in 2, 5 and 12 years-old schoolchildren. Secondarily, the influence of school infrastructure was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary data from 1762 schoolchildren from the municipality of Cajamar (SP, Brazil) and socioeconomic and environmental secondary data (Brazilian Census 2010, School Census, Prova Brasil/2017) were used. Caries and treatment experience (dmft/DMFT indices), dental occlusion, visible biofilm, weight and height were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caries experience was found in 6.5%, 40.2% and 46.5% of children at 2, 5 and 12 years, respectively. At 12y, greater caries experience was observed among children financially assisted by the Bolsa Família governmental program. Excess weight was found in 30%, 35% and 34% at 2, 5 and 12 years. At 2 and 5 years, the highest dental caries indices were associated with disadvantageous socioeconomic indicators (households water supply and sewage system, garbage collection, literate head and income), while overweight was associated with female sex and better socioeconomic aspects. At 12y, the group with obesity was characterized by low dmf+DMFT index and better household aspects, while the group with greater dmf+DMFT index comprised normal-weight children. A correlation between the percentage of caries experience and student/employee ratio of the school was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An association between disadvantageous socioeconomic and environmental aspects and dental caries was observed, while obesity was associated with better socioeconomic status of the schoolchildren. While no direct association was found between obesity and dental caries, the results emphasize the influence of socioeconomic/environmental variables on health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"122-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00053Oliveira05
L M Oliveira, T R Pelissari
Objective: To determine whether the association between tobacco advertising (TA) exposure and poor self-rated oral health (SROH) is mediated through secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in Brazilian adults who have never smoked.
Methods: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of The Brazilian National Health Survey 2019 data. The daily, weekly, or monthly exposure to SHS at home or at work was set as the mediator. Mediation analysis within a counterfactual approach used adjusted binary logistic regressions for both poor SROH and SHS exposure, to estimate the natural direct effect (NDE), natural indirect effect (NIE) through SHS exposure, and marginal total effect (MTE) of TA exposure on poor SROH. To assess the robustness of the results, we calculated the E-value for the MTE.
Results: The sample comprised 53,295 never smoker adults. The MTE of TA exposure on poor SROH was 1.09 (1.03, 1.16), with the indirect effect through SHS exposure responsible for only 16.6% of the total (NIE: 1.01 [1.01, 1.02] and NDE: 1.08 [1.02, 1.14]). An effect of 1.42 would be required for an unmeasured confounder to explain away the association between TA and SROH.
Conclusion: More individuals exposed to TA have poor SROH than those unexposed, with secondhand smoke exposure explaining only a small portion of this effect. Upstream tobacco policies should consider oral health outcomes.
{"title":"Tobacco advertising and oral health among never smokers: the mediating role of secondhand smoke exposure.","authors":"L M Oliveira, T R Pelissari","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00053Oliveira05","DOIUrl":"10.1922/CDH_00053Oliveira05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the association between tobacco advertising (TA) exposure and poor self-rated oral health (SROH) is mediated through secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in Brazilian adults who have never smoked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary cross-sectional analysis of The Brazilian National Health Survey 2019 data. The daily, weekly, or monthly exposure to SHS at home or at work was set as the mediator. Mediation analysis within a counterfactual approach used adjusted binary logistic regressions for both poor SROH and SHS exposure, to estimate the natural direct effect (NDE), natural indirect effect (NIE) through SHS exposure, and marginal total effect (MTE) of TA exposure on poor SROH. To assess the robustness of the results, we calculated the E-value for the MTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 53,295 never smoker adults. The MTE of TA exposure on poor SROH was 1.09 (1.03, 1.16), with the indirect effect through SHS exposure responsible for only 16.6% of the total (NIE: 1.01 [1.01, 1.02] and NDE: 1.08 [1.02, 1.14]). An effect of 1.42 would be required for an unmeasured confounder to explain away the association between TA and SROH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More individuals exposed to TA have poor SROH than those unexposed, with secondhand smoke exposure explaining only a small portion of this effect. Upstream tobacco policies should consider oral health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"140-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140874531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}