首页 > 最新文献

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of pitfall traps for capturing arthropods in turfgrass 草坪草中节肢动物诱捕陷阱的评价
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-05-06 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70045
Midhula Gireesh, Shimat V. Joseph

The turfgrass system is a complex ecosystem where many soil-born arthropods dwell and co-exist. Often, turfgrass is threatened by many pests, such as billbugs (Sphenophorus spp.; Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Monitoring pests is an important strategy for effective management decisions. The four-way linear pitfall trap is commonly used to determine adult Sphenophorus spp. population in turfgrass; however, it is challenging to deploy, labor-intensive, and requires regular intensive maintenance. The objectives of this study were to (1) compare trap captures of Sphenophorus spp. and predators using solo-cup, pail, two and four-way linear pitfall traps, and (2) evaluate whether increasing the number of simpler traps improves capture efficiency of soil-dwelling arthropods. The captures of adult Sphenophorus spp. and carabids in the four-way linear pitfall trap were not consistently greater than those caught in the two-way linear or single solo-cup pitfall traps. The four and eight solo-cup pitfall traps captured more Sphenophorus spp. and most soil-active predators than the four-way linear pitfall trap. The pail pitfall trap was not efficient in capturing soil-active arthropods. Thus, increased numbers of solo-cup pitfall traps, at least four in a defined trapping area, could be an alternative to the four-way linear pitfall trap to sample or monitor Sphenophorus spp. or carabids. Deploying and maintaining a solo cup is much easier than a four-way linear pitfall trap.

草坪草系统是一个复杂的生态系统,许多土壤节肢动物居住和共存。通常,草坪草受到许多害虫的威胁,如billbugs (Sphenophorus spp.;鞘翅目:象甲科)。监测有害生物是有效管理决策的重要策略。在草坪草中,常用四向线性诱蚊法测定黄颡鱼成虫数量;然而,它的部署具有挑战性,劳动密集型,并且需要定期进行密集维护。本研究的目的是:(1)比较单杯式、桶式、双路式和四路式线性陷阱对蝶类和捕食者的捕获效果;(2)评估增加简单陷阱的数量是否能提高土栖节肢动物的捕获效率。四路线性陷阱捕获的成年蝶和瓢虫的数量并不总是大于双路线性陷阱或单单杯陷阱。4个和8个单杯陷阱比4个线性陷阱捕获更多的蝶类和大多数土壤活跃的捕食者。桶形陷阱对土壤活性节肢动物的捕获效果不佳。因此,增加单杯陷阱的数量,在一个确定的陷阱区域至少四个,可以作为四路线性陷阱的一种替代方法,以取样或监测蝶蝇或锦鲤。部署和维护一个单独的杯子比一个四路线性陷阱要容易得多。
{"title":"Evaluation of pitfall traps for capturing arthropods in turfgrass","authors":"Midhula Gireesh,&nbsp;Shimat V. Joseph","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70045","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The turfgrass system is a complex ecosystem where many soil-born arthropods dwell and co-exist. Often, turfgrass is threatened by many pests, such as billbugs (<i>Sphenophorus</i> spp.; Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Monitoring pests is an important strategy for effective management decisions. The four-way linear pitfall trap is commonly used to determine adult <i>Sphenophorus</i> spp. population in turfgrass; however, it is challenging to deploy, labor-intensive, and requires regular intensive maintenance. The objectives of this study were to (1) compare trap captures of <i>Sphenophorus</i> spp. and predators using solo-cup, pail, two and four-way linear pitfall traps, and (2) evaluate whether increasing the number of simpler traps improves capture efficiency of soil-dwelling arthropods. The captures of adult <i>Sphenophorus</i> spp. and carabids in the four-way linear pitfall trap were not consistently greater than those caught in the two-way linear or single solo-cup pitfall traps. The four and eight solo-cup pitfall traps captured more <i>Sphenophorus</i> spp. and most soil-active predators than the four-way linear pitfall trap. The pail pitfall trap was not efficient in capturing soil-active arthropods. Thus, increased numbers of solo-cup pitfall traps, at least four in a defined trapping area, could be an alternative to the four-way linear pitfall trap to sample or monitor <i>Sphenophorus</i> spp. or carabids. Deploying and maintaining a solo cup is much easier than a four-way linear pitfall trap.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70045","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143914265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the agronomic effect of warm-season annual grasses interseeded into orchardgrass 暖季一年生草与果园草套种的农艺效果评价
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70044
Justin C. Burt, Kathy J. Soder, David M. Jaramillo

Pasture systems in the northeastern United States are primarily comprised of cool-season perennial grasses. However, these systems are subject to a lag in forage production during the hot summer months. Incorporating warm-season annual grasses (WSA) into these forage systems may improve overall forage productivity, especially for producers with a limited land base. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the agronomic effect of WSA interseeded into orchardgrass (Dactylus glomerata L.; OG) and harvested at two different intervals. This study compared monocultures of OG to OG interseeded with sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor × S. bicolor var. sudanense; SSG), pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.; PM) or teff grass (Eragrostis tef L.; TEFF), harvested on either a 6- or 12-week interval. Results indicated that inclusion of WSA into OG did not improve total herbage accumulation or nutritive value beyond the OG monoculture at either harvest interval (p > 0.42). However, inclusion of WSA into OG did affect the proportion of OG in the stand at both harvest intervals (p < 0.01). The greatest effect was observed in plots interseeded with SSG, in which there was a ∼14% and ∼25% decrease in OG compared to OG monoculture plots when harvested on a 6- and 12-week interval, respectively. This study concluded that interseeding WSA into OG did not improve agronomic parameters of the stand compared to OG despite implementing different harvest frequencies. Future research is warranted evaluating the effect of warm-season annual legumes under similar conditions on the forage production of cool-season perennial grass pastures.

美国东北部的牧场系统主要由冷季多年生草组成。然而,在炎热的夏季,这些系统受到饲料生产滞后的影响。将暖季一年生牧草(WSA)纳入这些饲料系统可以提高整体饲料生产力,特别是对于土地基础有限的生产者。因此,本研究的目的是比较WSA在果园草(Dactylus glomerata L.;OG),并在两个不同的时间间隔收获。本研究比较了OG与OG与高粱-苏丹草(Sorghum - sudanense;珍珠粟(Pennisetum glaucum L.;PM)或苔麸草(Eragrostis tef L.;TEFF),每隔6周或12周收获一次。结果表明,在任何收获期,在OG中加入WSA都没有提高牧草的总积累量或营养价值(p >;0.42)。然而,在两个采收期,将WSA加入到OG中确实影响了OG在林分中的比例(p <;0.01)。在与SSG杂交的地块中观察到最大的影响,在收获间隔6周和12周时,与OG单作地块相比,OG分别减少了14%和25%。本研究认为,不同采收频率下,间种WSA对林分农艺参数的改善作用并不明显。今后应进一步研究暖季一年生豆科植物在相似条件下对冷季多年生牧草生产的影响。
{"title":"Evaluating the agronomic effect of warm-season annual grasses interseeded into orchardgrass","authors":"Justin C. Burt,&nbsp;Kathy J. Soder,&nbsp;David M. Jaramillo","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pasture systems in the northeastern United States are primarily comprised of cool-season perennial grasses. However, these systems are subject to a lag in forage production during the hot summer months. Incorporating warm-season annual grasses (WSA) into these forage systems may improve overall forage productivity, especially for producers with a limited land base. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the agronomic effect of WSA interseeded into orchardgrass (<i>Dactylus glomerata</i> L.; OG) and harvested at two different intervals. This study compared monocultures of OG to OG interseeded with sorghum-sudangrass (<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> × <i>S. bicolor</i> var. sudanense; SSG), pearl millet (<i>Pennisetum glaucum</i> L.; PM) or teff grass (<i>Eragrostis tef</i> L.; TEFF), harvested on either a 6- or 12-week interval. Results indicated that inclusion of WSA into OG did not improve total herbage accumulation or nutritive value beyond the OG monoculture at either harvest interval (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.42). However, inclusion of WSA into OG did affect the proportion of OG in the stand at both harvest intervals (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The greatest effect was observed in plots interseeded with SSG, in which there was a ∼14% and ∼25% decrease in OG compared to OG monoculture plots when harvested on a 6- and 12-week interval, respectively. This study concluded that interseeding WSA into OG did not improve agronomic parameters of the stand compared to OG despite implementing different harvest frequencies. Future research is warranted evaluating the effect of warm-season annual legumes under similar conditions on the forage production of cool-season perennial grass pastures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143884168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing drought resilience in grass pea through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobium symbiosis 通过丛枝菌根真菌和根瘤菌共生提高草豆抗旱性
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70043
Hamid Reza Shamsaee, Meysam Oveysi, Mohammad Nasri, Hamid Reza Larijani, Hamid Reza Tohidi Moghadam

A 2-year experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of Rhizobium bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in improving the growth and yield-related traits of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) under different irrigation regimes (well-watered, mild water stress, and severe water stress). The results showed that unfertilized and water-stressed plants had the lowest performance, while plants inoculated with bioinoculants exhibited the best growth and yield. Water limitation led to a reduction in total chlorophyll content (20.3%), leaf area index (20.32%), relative water content (5.5%), seeds/pod (2.9%), pods/plant (20.23%), 1000-seed weight (2.92%), pod harvest index (0.72%), seed yield (24.5%), and biological yield (17.69%) compared to the well-watered treatment over 2 years. Rhizobium inoculation enhanced relative water content, seeds/pod, 100-seed weight, biological yield, and pod harvest index by an average of 9.25%, 4.82%, 4.81%, 16.78%, and 1.36%, respectively. Similarly, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation increased relative water content (7.7%), seeds/pod (3.8%), 1000-seed weight (3.9%), pod harvest index (1.04%), and pod partitioning index (13.9%). These findings suggest that applying a combination of bioinoculants from different microbial groups can be an effective strategy for enhancing the productivity of grass pea under water-limited conditions.

通过为期2年的试验,研究了不同灌溉方式(丰水、轻度水分胁迫和重度水分胁迫)下根瘤菌和丛枝菌根真菌对草豆生长和产量相关性状的促进作用。结果表明,未施肥和缺水的植株生长性能最差,而接种了生物接种剂的植株生长和产量最好。2年多的水分限制导致总叶绿素含量(20.3%)、叶面积指数(20.32%)、相对含水量(5.5%)、种子/荚果(2.9%)、荚果/株(20.23%)、千粒重(2.92%)、荚果收获指数(0.72%)、种子产量(24.5%)和生物产量(17.69%)与丰水处理相比下降。接种根瘤菌可使相对含水量、种子/荚果数、百粒重、生物产量和荚果收获指数平均提高9.25%、4.82%、4.81%、16.78%和1.36%。同样,接种丛枝菌根真菌可提高相对含水量(7.7%)、种子/荚果(3.8%)、千粒重(3.9%)、荚果收获指数(1.04%)和荚果分配指数(13.9%)。这些结果表明,在水分限制条件下,施用不同微生物群的生物接种剂可能是提高草豆产量的有效策略。
{"title":"Enhancing drought resilience in grass pea through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobium symbiosis","authors":"Hamid Reza Shamsaee,&nbsp;Meysam Oveysi,&nbsp;Mohammad Nasri,&nbsp;Hamid Reza Larijani,&nbsp;Hamid Reza Tohidi Moghadam","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70043","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A 2-year experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of Rhizobium bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in improving the growth and yield-related traits of grass pea (<i>Lathyrus sativus</i> L.) under different irrigation regimes (well-watered, mild water stress, and severe water stress). The results showed that unfertilized and water-stressed plants had the lowest performance, while plants inoculated with bioinoculants exhibited the best growth and yield. Water limitation led to a reduction in total chlorophyll content (20.3%), leaf area index (20.32%), relative water content (5.5%), seeds/pod (2.9%), pods/plant (20.23%), 1000-seed weight (2.92%), pod harvest index (0.72%), seed yield (24.5%), and biological yield (17.69%) compared to the well-watered treatment over 2 years. Rhizobium inoculation enhanced relative water content, seeds/pod, 100-seed weight, biological yield, and pod harvest index by an average of 9.25%, 4.82%, 4.81%, 16.78%, and 1.36%, respectively. Similarly, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation increased relative water content (7.7%), seeds/pod (3.8%), 1000-seed weight (3.9%), pod harvest index (1.04%), and pod partitioning index (13.9%). These findings suggest that applying a combination of bioinoculants from different microbial groups can be an effective strategy for enhancing the productivity of grass pea under water-limited conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143884169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soybean relative maturity group choices may not be related to latitude only 大豆相对成熟度群体的选择可能不仅仅与纬度有关
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70042
Md. Rasel Parvej, David L. Holshouser

Selecting an appropriate relative maturity group (MG) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] for a geographic location within a state is a crucial factor in ensuring profitable soybean production. Choosing an inappropriate MG can significantly reduce yield. We determined the probability of a relative MG yielding similar to or better than the other MGs by analyzing the yield data of full-season and double-crop soybean from Official Variety Tests (OVT) that were conducted across five locations in Virginia from 2006 to 2015. We considered MGs 3 to 5 for full-season and MGs 4 to 5 for double-crop soybean. Each MG was divided into three sub-groups: early (x.0-x.3), mid (x.4-x.6), and late (x.7-x.9). While MG significantly influenced soybean yield in most site-years with few exceptions, location affected the yield performance of a MG more for full-season than double-crop soybean. For full-season soybean, late MG-3 and 4 at Orange (38.3°N, −78.1°W), early to mid-MG-5 at Warsaw (38.0°N, −76.8°W), mid to late MG-4 at Painter (37.6°N, −75.8°W), and early to late MG-5 at Blackstone (37.1°N, −78.0°W) and Suffolk (36.7°N, −76.8°W), VA, had the highest outyielding capacity and probability to yield similar to or greater than other MGs. For double-crop soybean, late MG-4 consistently performed best across most locations, except for Blackstone, where early MG-5 was the optimal choice. Results offer valuable insights to soybean producers for confidently selecting the best MG with the greatest yield probability in their farming locations within Virginia. This analysis can serve as a model for similar investigations in other states using OVT data.

选择合适的相对成熟组(MG)大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。在一个州内的地理位置是确保大豆生产有利可图的关键因素。选择不合适的MG会显著降低产量。通过分析2006年至2015年在弗吉尼亚州五个地点进行的官方品种试验(OVT)的全季和双季大豆产量数据,我们确定了相对MG产量与其他MG相似或更好的可能性。我们考虑在全季大豆中添加3至5毫克,在双季大豆中添加4至5毫克。每个MG分为早期(x.0-x.3)、中期(x.4-x.6)和晚期(x.7-x.9) 3个亚组。MG对大豆产量的影响在大部分立地年均显著,但位置对MG全季产量的影响大于双季大豆产量。在全季大豆中,橙区(38.3°N, - 78.1°W) MG-3和MG-4后期、Warsaw区(38.0°N, - 76.8°W) MG-5早期至中期、Painter区(37.6°N, - 75.8°W) MG-4中后期、Blackstone区(37.1°N, - 78.0°W)和Suffolk区(36.7°N, - 76.8°W) MG-5早期至后期的产量最高,产量与其他MG-5相近或更高。对于双季豆,除了黑石,早期MG-5是最佳选择外,晚期MG-4在大多数地区都表现最好。结果为大豆生产者提供了有价值的见解,可以在弗吉尼亚州的种植地点自信地选择产量最大的最佳MG。该分析可以作为其他州使用OVT数据进行类似调查的模型。
{"title":"Soybean relative maturity group choices may not be related to latitude only","authors":"Md. Rasel Parvej,&nbsp;David L. Holshouser","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70042","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Selecting an appropriate relative maturity group (MG) soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] for a geographic location within a state is a crucial factor in ensuring profitable soybean production. Choosing an inappropriate MG can significantly reduce yield. We determined the probability of a relative MG yielding similar to or better than the other MGs by analyzing the yield data of full-season and double-crop soybean from Official Variety Tests (OVT) that were conducted across five locations in Virginia from 2006 to 2015. We considered MGs 3 to 5 for full-season and MGs 4 to 5 for double-crop soybean. Each MG was divided into three sub-groups: early (x.0-x.3), mid (x.4-x.6), and late (x.7-x.9). While MG significantly influenced soybean yield in most site-years with few exceptions, location affected the yield performance of a MG more for full-season than double-crop soybean. For full-season soybean, late MG-3 and 4 at Orange (38.3°N, −78.1°W), early to mid-MG-5 at Warsaw (38.0°N, −76.8°W), mid to late MG-4 at Painter (37.6°N, −75.8°W), and early to late MG-5 at Blackstone (37.1°N, −78.0°W) and Suffolk (36.7°N, −76.8°W), VA, had the highest outyielding capacity and probability to yield similar to or greater than other MGs. For double-crop soybean, late MG-4 consistently performed best across most locations, except for Blackstone, where early MG-5 was the optimal choice. Results offer valuable insights to soybean producers for confidently selecting the best MG with the greatest yield probability in their farming locations within Virginia. This analysis can serve as a model for similar investigations in other states using OVT data.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143883984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationships among vegetation indices for different crops in the Northern Great Plains 北部大平原不同作物植被指数之间的关系
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70041
A. Chatterjee

Wide-spread adoption of proximal sensors in crop health assessment requires understanding of changes in canopy reflectance during the growing season and associations among readings from different sensors. Chlorophyll meter reading (Soil Plant Analysis Development, SPAD), red normalized difference vegetation index (RNDVI), and red-edge normalized difference vegetation index (RENDVI) were measured for sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.), corn (Zea mays), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soybean (Glycine max), and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) throughout the 2021 growing season. Cumulative growing degree days (GDD) had a significant relationship with SPAD, RNDVI, and RENDVI. The correlation coefficient indicated SPAD was more associated with RENDVI (r = 0.73) than RNDVI (0.50). The R2 values of multiple linear regression of SPAD and GDD with RNDVI and RENDVI were the lowest for spring wheat (0.33 and 0.52, respectively) and the highest for corn (0.94 and 0.95, respectively). For all major five crops grown in the Northern Great Plains, GDD showed a strong relationship with all three indices. For in-season crop health assessment based on vegetation indices, inclusion of GDD could be a useful predictor variable to develop a single model algorithm applicable for multiple crops at a regional scale.

近端传感器在作物健康评估中的广泛应用需要了解生长季节冠层反射率的变化以及不同传感器读数之间的关联。在2021年的整个生长季节,对甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)、玉米(Zea mays)、向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)、大豆(Glycine max)和春小麦(Triticum aestivum)进行了叶绿素读数(SPAD)、红色归一化差异植被指数(RNDVI)和红边归一化差异植被指数(RENDVI)的测量。累积生长日数(GDD)与SPAD、RNDVI、RENDVI呈极显著相关。相关系数显示SPAD与RENDVI的相关性(r = 0.73)高于RNDVI(0.50)。SPAD和GDD与RNDVI和RENDVI的多元线性回归R2值以春小麦最低(分别为0.33和0.52),玉米最高(分别为0.94和0.95)。对于北方大平原种植的所有主要五种作物,gdp与这三个指数都表现出很强的关系。对于基于植被指数的季节性作物健康评估,纳入GDD可以作为一个有用的预测变量,用于开发适用于区域尺度上多种作物的单一模型算法。
{"title":"Relationships among vegetation indices for different crops in the Northern Great Plains","authors":"A. Chatterjee","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wide-spread adoption of proximal sensors in crop health assessment requires understanding of changes in canopy reflectance during the growing season and associations among readings from different sensors. Chlorophyll meter reading (Soil Plant Analysis Development, SPAD), red normalized difference vegetation index (RNDVI), and red-edge normalized difference vegetation index (RENDVI) were measured for sugarbeet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.), corn (<i>Zea mays</i>), sunflower (<i>Helianthus annuus</i> L.), soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>), and spring wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>) throughout the 2021 growing season. Cumulative growing degree days (GDD) had a significant relationship with SPAD, RNDVI, and RENDVI. The correlation coefficient indicated SPAD was more associated with RENDVI (<i>r</i> = 0.73) than RNDVI (0.50). The <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of multiple linear regression of SPAD and GDD with RNDVI and RENDVI were the lowest for spring wheat (0.33 and 0.52, respectively) and the highest for corn (0.94 and 0.95, respectively). For all major five crops grown in the Northern Great Plains, GDD showed a strong relationship with all three indices. For in-season crop health assessment based on vegetation indices, inclusion of GDD could be a useful predictor variable to develop a single model algorithm applicable for multiple crops at a regional scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143801516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variety choice influences soft red winter wheat yield more than seed treatment 品种选择对软红冬小麦产量的影响大于种子处理
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70037
Haleigh J. Ortmeier-Clarke, Spyridon Mourtzinis, Damon L. Smith, Martin I. Chilvers, Darcy E. P. Telenko, Shawn P. Conley

Seed treatments are commonly used to protect most major crops in the United States from seed- and soil-borne pathogens. In winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) systems in the North Central United States, target pathogens include both true fungi like Fusarium spp. or Rhizoctonia spp. and oomycetes like Pythium spp. or Globisporangium spp. Potential benefits of seed treatments may include improved germination and emergence, protection against early season diseases, and improved plant vigor, but there is little recent research on the benefits of seed treatments in winter wheat in the North Central United States. Field experiments were established at 10 locations across Wisconsin, Indiana, and Michigan in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the effect of seed treatments on winter wheat yield. The trial design was a randomized complete block with four replications. Treatments were a factorial of two varieties, Harpoon and Kaskaskia, and five seed treatments, non-treated control, Athena-R, CruiserMaxx Vibrance Cereals, Stamina F4, and Raxil Pro MD/Shield. The variety Harpoon resulted in greater yield and lower test weight than Kaskaksia. The only seed treatment to affect yield was Athena-R when applied to the Harpoon variety. No other seed treatment significantly impacted yield. Results of this study suggest that while seed treatments can provide yield protection, variety selection had a bigger role in overall yield potential.

在美国,种子处理通常用于保护大多数主要作物免受种子和土壤传播的病原体的侵害。在美国中北部的冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)系统中,目标病原体包括真真菌,如镰刀菌或根核菌,以及卵菌,如Pythium spp.或Globisporangium spp.种子处理的潜在好处可能包括提高发芽和出芽,防止早季疾病,提高植物活力,但最近很少有关于种子处理在美国中北部冬小麦中的好处的研究。研究人员于2021年和2022年在威斯康星州、印第安纳州和密歇根州的10个地点进行了田间试验,以评估种子处理对冬小麦产量的影响。试验设计为随机完全区组,有4个重复。处理是两个品种(Harpoon和Kaskaskia)和五个种子处理(未处理对照,Athena-R, CruiserMaxx Vibrance Cereals, Stamina F4和Raxil Pro MD/Shield)的因子。鱼叉品种的产量比Kaskaksia高,试验重量比Kaskaksia低。唯一影响产量的种子处理是用于鱼叉品种的雅典娜- r。其他种子处理对产量无显著影响。本研究结果表明,种子处理可以提供产量保护,但品种选择对整体产量潜力的影响更大。
{"title":"Variety choice influences soft red winter wheat yield more than seed treatment","authors":"Haleigh J. Ortmeier-Clarke,&nbsp;Spyridon Mourtzinis,&nbsp;Damon L. Smith,&nbsp;Martin I. Chilvers,&nbsp;Darcy E. P. Telenko,&nbsp;Shawn P. Conley","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seed treatments are commonly used to protect most major crops in the United States from seed- and soil-borne pathogens. In winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) systems in the North Central United States, target pathogens include both true fungi like <i>Fusarium</i> spp. or <i>Rhizoctonia</i> spp. and oomycetes like <i>Pythium</i> spp. or <i>Globisporangium</i> spp. Potential benefits of seed treatments may include improved germination and emergence, protection against early season diseases, and improved plant vigor, but there is little recent research on the benefits of seed treatments in winter wheat in the North Central United States. Field experiments were established at 10 locations across Wisconsin, Indiana, and Michigan in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the effect of seed treatments on winter wheat yield. The trial design was a randomized complete block with four replications. Treatments were a factorial of two varieties, Harpoon and Kaskaskia, and five seed treatments, non-treated control, Athena-R, CruiserMaxx Vibrance Cereals, Stamina F4, and Raxil Pro MD/Shield. The variety Harpoon resulted in greater yield and lower test weight than Kaskaksia. The only seed treatment to affect yield was Athena-R when applied to the Harpoon variety. No other seed treatment significantly impacted yield. Results of this study suggest that while seed treatments can provide yield protection, variety selection had a bigger role in overall yield potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of dicyandiamide-treated urea on furrow-irrigated rice yield and nitrogen uptake 双氰胺处理尿素对沟灌水稻产量和氮素吸收的影响
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70038
Justin L. Chlapecka, Trenton L. Roberts, Jarrod T. Hardke

Furrow-irrigated rice (FIR; Oryza sativa L.) has been grown in the upper Mid-South since the 1980s. Nitrogen use in FIR is less efficient than direct-seeded, delayed-flood rice due to the lack of a flood, which ultimately protects applied nitrogen (N) from nitrification and subsequent denitrification. If urea applied to FIR fields could be protected from nitrification, N use efficiency could be increased. To address this issue, a test was initiated in 2018 to determine the utility of a blended-urea product that included < 0.1% N-butyl-thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), a urease inhibitor that is recommended on most urea applications to rice, and 0.85% dicyandiamide (DCD), a nitrification inhibitor. A control with no supplemental N application plus six different N management programs were tested as urea + NBPT with or without DCD. Analyses across six sites over 2 years suggested that DCD did not affect any of the variables measured, including total N uptake, recovery efficiency of N, rice grain yield, and rice milling yield. While this is contrary to some previous studies, the product used in the current study contained approximately 10 times less DCD than previous studies in rice. Therefore, out of the products tested, the authors recommend purchasing the lowest cost option.

自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,犁沟灌溉水稻(FIR;Oryza sativa L.)一直在上中南地区种植。与直接播种、延迟灌溉的水稻相比,犁沟灌溉水稻的氮利用效率较低,原因是没有洪水,洪水最终会使施用的氮(N)免于硝化和随后的反硝化。如果施用在水稻田中的尿素能防止硝化,就能提高氮的利用率。为解决这一问题,2018 年启动了一项试验,以确定混合尿素产品的效用,其中包括 < 0.1% N-丁基硫代磷酸三酰胺(NBPT)(一种脲酶抑制剂,建议用于大多数水稻尿素施用)和 0.85% 双氰胺(DCD)(一种硝化抑制剂)。不施用氮补充剂的对照组以及六种不同的氮管理方案(尿素 + NBPT + 或不 + DCD)均接受了测试。对 6 个地点 2 年的分析表明,DCD 不会影响任何测量变量,包括氮的总吸收量、氮的回收效率、稻谷产量和碾米产量。虽然这与之前的一些研究结果相反,但本研究中使用的产品所含的 DCD 比之前的水稻研究结果少约 10 倍。因此,在测试的产品中,作者建议购买成本最低的产品。
{"title":"Effect of dicyandiamide-treated urea on furrow-irrigated rice yield and nitrogen uptake","authors":"Justin L. Chlapecka,&nbsp;Trenton L. Roberts,&nbsp;Jarrod T. Hardke","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Furrow-irrigated rice (FIR; <i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) has been grown in the upper Mid-South since the 1980s. Nitrogen use in FIR is less efficient than direct-seeded, delayed-flood rice due to the lack of a flood, which ultimately protects applied nitrogen (N) from nitrification and subsequent denitrification. If urea applied to FIR fields could be protected from nitrification, N use efficiency could be increased. To address this issue, a test was initiated in 2018 to determine the utility of a blended-urea product that included &lt; 0.1% <i>N</i>-butyl-thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), a urease inhibitor that is recommended on most urea applications to rice, and 0.85% dicyandiamide (DCD), a nitrification inhibitor. A control with no supplemental N application plus six different N management programs were tested as urea + NBPT with or without DCD. Analyses across six sites over 2 years suggested that DCD did not affect any of the variables measured, including total N uptake, recovery efficiency of N, rice grain yield, and rice milling yield. While this is contrary to some previous studies, the product used in the current study contained approximately 10 times less DCD than previous studies in rice. Therefore, out of the products tested, the authors recommend purchasing the lowest cost option.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nitrogen fertilizer improves no-till soybean seed yield 氮肥提高免耕大豆种子产量
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70040
Mark A. Kendall, Spyridon Mourtzinis, John M. Gaska, Shawn P. Conley

No-tillage (NT) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] following corn (Zea mays L.) is a common practice in the United States. It reduces production costs associated with tillage such as labor, fuel, and equipment, in addition to providing environmental benefits such as reduced erosion and carbon emissions. However, in some situations, NT soybean seed yield can be reduced compared to conventional tillage (CT). The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the effects of nitrogen, corn residue management, and tillage on soybean seed yield, and (ii) recommend optimal residue and nitrogen (N) management strategies for NT soybean following corn. The study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Arlington Agricultural Research Station near Arlington, WI, during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons. Treatments were tested in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Treatments were combinations of NT, CT, N fertilizer application, and corn residue management (removed, chopped, or none). Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue. Applying 30 lbs N acre−1 prior to NT planting soybean into corn residue and CT increased seed yield by 4.1 bu acre−1 (6.1%) and 5.3 bu acre−1 (7.8%), respectively compared to NT soybean planted into corn residue. The addition of a low rate of spring N can be a tool for producers to increase NT soybean seed yield rather than performing tillage.

免耕大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。在美国,跟随玉米(Zea mays L.)是一种常见的做法。它降低了与耕作相关的生产成本,如劳动力、燃料和设备,除了提供环境效益,如减少侵蚀和碳排放。然而,在某些情况下,与传统耕作(CT)相比,NT大豆种子产量可能会降低。本研究的目的是(i)量化氮肥、玉米秸秆管理和耕作对大豆种子产量的影响,以及(ii)为NT大豆后续玉米推荐最佳的秸秆和氮肥管理策略。这项研究是在威斯康星州阿灵顿附近的威斯康星大学麦迪逊阿灵顿农业研究站进行的,时间是2022年和2023年的生长季节。试验采用随机完全区组设计,共4个重复。处理是NT、CT、氮肥施用和玉米残茬管理(去除、切碎或不处理)的组合。去除玉米渣对大豆籽粒产量没有影响。在玉米渣中播种大豆之前,在玉米渣中播种30磅氮肥,与玉米渣中播种的大豆相比,玉米渣中播种的大豆产量分别增加了4.1亿英亩(6.1%)和5.3亿英亩(7.8%)。添加低速率的春氮可以作为生产者提高NT大豆种子产量的工具,而不是进行耕作。
{"title":"Nitrogen fertilizer improves no-till soybean seed yield","authors":"Mark A. Kendall,&nbsp;Spyridon Mourtzinis,&nbsp;John M. Gaska,&nbsp;Shawn P. Conley","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70040","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>No-tillage (NT) soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] following corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) is a common practice in the United States. It reduces production costs associated with tillage such as labor, fuel, and equipment, in addition to providing environmental benefits such as reduced erosion and carbon emissions. However, in some situations, NT soybean seed yield can be reduced compared to conventional tillage (CT). The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the effects of nitrogen, corn residue management, and tillage on soybean seed yield, and (ii) recommend optimal residue and nitrogen (N) management strategies for NT soybean following corn. The study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Arlington Agricultural Research Station near Arlington, WI, during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons. Treatments were tested in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Treatments were combinations of NT, CT, N fertilizer application, and corn residue management (removed, chopped, or none). Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue. Applying 30 lbs N acre<sup>−1</sup> prior to NT planting soybean into corn residue and CT increased seed yield by 4.1 bu acre<sup>−1</sup> (6.1%) and 5.3 bu acre<sup>−1</sup> (7.8%), respectively compared to NT soybean planted into corn residue. The addition of a low rate of spring N can be a tool for producers to increase NT soybean seed yield rather than performing tillage.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Row spacing effects on soybean production in North Carolina 行距对北卡罗来纳州大豆产量的影响
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70036
D. R. Stokes, R. A. Vann, J. L. Heitman, G. D. Collins, K. D. Stowe

North Carolina soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] growers use a diverse range of row spacings, commonly between 7.5 and 38 inches. Research findings regarding the effect of row spacing on soybean yield have been inconsistent and influenced by factors such as planting date and environmental conditions. Although small-plot data from North Carolina often indicates that narrower row spacings lead to higher yields, growers have raised concerns about the potential benefits of wide rows when ripping is employed in environments exhibiting symptoms of subsurface compaction. Research was conducted over 2 years (2021–2022) in the Coastal Plain region to evaluate the effects of wide row ripped spacing (36 or 38 inches) compared to un-ripped narrower spacing (15 inches) on plant population, canopy cover, soil compaction, and yield across four environments. One of the environments included an additional treatment with an un-ripped drilled row spacing of 7.5 inches. Although seeding rates were calibrated similarly, the ripped wide-row spacing treatments led to lower achieved plant population, predominantly due to adverse seed bed conditions resulting in lower germination caused by the inline ripper. The un-ripped narrow row spacings (7.5 and 15 inches) consistently demonstrated 7–25% greater canopy cover than ripped wider spacings (36 and 38 inches) by the flowering stage (R1). Soil penetration resistance varied by row spacing in only two environments, with differences generally lacking agronomic significance (i.e., penetration resistance <2 MPa). Yield results indicated no significant effect of row spacing in three out of four environments; in the fourth environment, the un-ripped 15-inch row spacing yielded significantly more than both the un-ripped drilled and ripped wide-row soybeans. In the environments in this study, wide-row ripped treatments offered no agronomical advantage over narrow row un-ripped treatments.

北卡罗来纳大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。种植者使用不同的行距,通常在7.5到38英寸之间。行距对大豆产量影响的研究结果不一致,且受种植日期和环境条件等因素的影响。尽管来自北卡罗莱纳的小块数据经常表明,较窄的行间距导致更高的产量,但种植者对在表现出地下压实症状的环境中进行撕裂时,宽行可能带来的好处表示担忧。在沿海平原地区进行了为期2年(2021-2022)的研究,以评估宽行撕开间距(36或38英寸)与未撕开的窄行间距(15英寸)在四种环境下对植物种群、冠层覆盖、土壤压实和产量的影响。其中一种环境包括额外的处理,未撕裂的行间距为7.5英寸。尽管播种率的校准方法相似,但宽行距撕裂处理导致了较低的植物种群数量,主要是由于不利的种子床条件导致了内联撕裂器导致的发芽率降低。在开花期(R1),未撕开的窄行距(7.5和15英寸)比撕开的宽行距(36和38英寸)的冠层盖度高7-25%。仅在两种环境下,土壤穿透阻力随行距的变化而变化,其差异通常缺乏农艺意义(即穿透阻力<;2 MPa)。结果表明,四种环境中有三种环境行距对产量无显著影响;在第四种环境中,未撕开15英寸行距的大豆产量明显高于未撕开的钻行大豆和撕开的宽行大豆。在本研究的环境中,宽行撕裂处理与窄行未撕裂处理相比没有农艺优势。
{"title":"Row spacing effects on soybean production in North Carolina","authors":"D. R. Stokes,&nbsp;R. A. Vann,&nbsp;J. L. Heitman,&nbsp;G. D. Collins,&nbsp;K. D. Stowe","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70036","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p>North Carolina soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] growers use a diverse range of row spacings, commonly between 7.5 and 38 inches. Research findings regarding the effect of row spacing on soybean yield have been inconsistent and influenced by factors such as planting date and environmental conditions. Although small-plot data from North Carolina often indicates that narrower row spacings lead to higher yields, growers have raised concerns about the potential benefits of wide rows when ripping is employed in environments exhibiting symptoms of subsurface compaction. Research was conducted over 2 years (2021–2022) in the Coastal Plain region to evaluate the effects of wide row ripped spacing (36 or 38 inches) compared to un-ripped narrower spacing (15 inches) on plant population, canopy cover, soil compaction, and yield across four environments. One of the environments included an additional treatment with an un-ripped drilled row spacing of 7.5 inches. Although seeding rates were calibrated similarly, the ripped wide-row spacing treatments led to lower achieved plant population, predominantly due to adverse seed bed conditions resulting in lower germination caused by the inline ripper. The un-ripped narrow row spacings (7.5 and 15 inches) consistently demonstrated 7–25% greater canopy cover than ripped wider spacings (36 and 38 inches) by the flowering stage (R1). Soil penetration resistance varied by row spacing in only two environments, with differences generally lacking agronomic significance (i.e., penetration resistance &lt;2 MPa). Yield results indicated no significant effect of row spacing in three out of four environments; in the fourth environment, the un-ripped 15-inch row spacing yielded significantly more than both the un-ripped drilled and ripped wide-row soybeans. In the environments in this study, wide-row ripped treatments offered no agronomical advantage over narrow row un-ripped treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143717319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying herbicides to manage weeds in a buckwheat cover crop and for the control of volunteers 确定用于管理荞麦覆盖作物杂草的除草剂,并对志愿者进行控制
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70034
Taylor Randell-Singleton, Hannah E. Wright-Smith, Lavesta C. Hand, Jenna C. Vance, A. Stanley Culpepper

Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) is a fast-growing plant that quickly produces a dense groundcover. The utilization of buckwheat as a cover crop in vegetable production could be beneficial to Georgia producers, however for successful adoption, weed control in the cover crop coupled with control of buckwheat volunteers must be achievable. A preemergence (PRE) and a postemergence (POST) experiment were each conducted three times in Ty Ty, GA (2020–2021) addressing these objectives. In the PRE study, acetochlor at 0.56 lb ai acre−1 injured buckwheat up to 16% without negatively influencing growth, suggesting potential for use in buckwheat for weed control. Flumioxazin, fomesafen, halosulfuron, ethalfluralin and S-metolachlor lacked adequate buckwheat safety. However, flumioxazin at 0.05 lb ai acre−1, fomesafen at 0.19 lb ai acre−1, and halosulfuron at 0.02 lb ai acre−1 were identified as effective options to manage volunteer plants, as control exceeded 80%. In the POST experiment, buckwheat injury from 2,4-D, clethodim, dicamba, glufosinate, glyphosate, halosulfuron, linuron, paraquat, and prometryn was evaluated, and when considering all evaluation parameters, paraquat (0.50 lb ai acre−1) was the most effective option for the control of buckwheat. This was followed by glufosinate (0.59 and 1.17 lb ai acre−1) and glyphosate (1.20 and 2.40 lb ai acre−1). For potential applications over buckwheat for weed management, clethodim (0.12 lb ai acre−1) was the only POST herbicide that provided adequate crop safety.

荞麦(Fagopyrum esculentum)是一种快速生长的植物,可以迅速产生密集的地被植物。在蔬菜生产中利用荞麦作为覆盖作物可能对格鲁吉亚生产者有益,但要成功采用,必须实现覆盖作物中的杂草控制以及荞麦志愿者的控制。为了实现这些目标,在乔治亚州Ty Ty(2020-2021)分别进行了三次出现前(PRE)和出现后(POST)实验。在PRE研究中,0.56 lb / acre - 1的乙草胺对荞麦的伤害高达16%,但对其生长没有负面影响,这表明在荞麦中有可能用于杂草控制。氟恶嗪、氟美沙芬、氟磺隆、氟乙烷和s -甲草胺缺乏足够的荞麦安全性。然而,氟恶嗪0.05 lb / acre - 1、氟美沙芬0.19 lb / acre - 1和氟磺隆0.02 lb / acre - 1被确定为管理志愿植物的有效选择,因为控制率超过80%。在POST试验中,对2,4- d、杀虫灵、麦草畏、草甘膦、草甘膦、氟磺隆、利脲隆、百草枯和promedyyn对荞麦的危害进行了评价,综合所有评价参数,百草枯(0.50 lb / acre - 1)是防治荞麦最有效的选择。其次是草甘膦(0.59和1.17磅每英亩- 1)和草甘膦(1.20和2.40磅每英亩- 1)。对于荞麦杂草管理的潜在应用,clethodim (0.12 lb / acre - 1)是唯一提供足够作物安全性的POST除草剂。
{"title":"Identifying herbicides to manage weeds in a buckwheat cover crop and for the control of volunteers","authors":"Taylor Randell-Singleton,&nbsp;Hannah E. Wright-Smith,&nbsp;Lavesta C. Hand,&nbsp;Jenna C. Vance,&nbsp;A. Stanley Culpepper","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Buckwheat (<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i>) is a fast-growing plant that quickly produces a dense groundcover. The utilization of buckwheat as a cover crop in vegetable production could be beneficial to Georgia producers, however for successful adoption, weed control in the cover crop coupled with control of buckwheat volunteers must be achievable. A preemergence (PRE) and a postemergence (POST) experiment were each conducted three times in Ty Ty, GA (2020–2021) addressing these objectives. In the PRE study, acetochlor at 0.56 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup> injured buckwheat up to 16% without negatively influencing growth, suggesting potential for use in buckwheat for weed control. Flumioxazin, fomesafen, halosulfuron, ethalfluralin and <i>S</i>-metolachlor lacked adequate buckwheat safety. However, flumioxazin at 0.05 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>, fomesafen at 0.19 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>, and halosulfuron at 0.02 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup> were identified as effective options to manage volunteer plants, as control exceeded 80%. In the POST experiment, buckwheat injury from 2,4-D, clethodim, dicamba, glufosinate, glyphosate, halosulfuron, linuron, paraquat, and prometryn was evaluated, and when considering all evaluation parameters, paraquat (0.50 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) was the most effective option for the control of buckwheat. This was followed by glufosinate (0.59 and 1.17 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) and glyphosate (1.20 and 2.40 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>). For potential applications over buckwheat for weed management, clethodim (0.12 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) was the only POST herbicide that provided adequate crop safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143707245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1