Pub Date : 2020-06-02DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2020.05.1937
J. Pascual
Este trabajo analiza la forma en que la piedad socrática y sus ideas religiosas, en un contexto histórico hostil al filósofo, se enfrentaban con la piedad popular y las creencias religiosas de la polis. De este modo, el escepticismo de Sócrates hacia los relatos mitológicos, la idea de que existía un único canon de virtud universal, aplicable tanto a las cosas divinas como humanas, y la separación de la piedad y la justicia de la voluntad de los dioses, le llevaron a socavar las bases de la religión griega que se fundamentaban en el temor y respeto a los dioses y en una práctica cultual tradicional que garantizaba la protección de los dioses necesaria para la supervivencia de la comunidad.
{"title":"Piedad, impiedad y justicia en la polis (a propósito del Eutifrón de Platón)","authors":"J. Pascual","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2020.05.1937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.05.1937","url":null,"abstract":"Este trabajo analiza la forma en que la piedad socrática y sus ideas religiosas, en un contexto histórico hostil al filósofo, se enfrentaban con la piedad popular y las creencias religiosas de la polis. De este modo, el escepticismo de Sócrates hacia los relatos mitológicos, la idea de que existía un único canon de virtud universal, aplicable tanto a las cosas divinas como humanas, y la separación de la piedad y la justicia de la voluntad de los dioses, le llevaron a socavar las bases de la religión griega que se fundamentaban en el temor y respeto a los dioses y en una práctica cultual tradicional que garantizaba la protección de los dioses necesaria para la supervivencia de la comunidad.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47300543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-02DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2020.07.1923
Alexey V. Belousov
El artículo está dedicado a verificar la lectura y establecer el texto de una tablilla mágica de Panticapeo. El autor propone un nuevo texto con aparato crítico de la inscripción y discute la nueva interpretación ofrecida recientemente por Eleni Chronopoulou desde el contexto más amplio de las prácticas mágicas en la Antigüedad.
{"title":"Una tablilla de maldición de la necrópolis de Panticapeo (SEG LXIII 616) revisitada","authors":"Alexey V. Belousov","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2020.07.1923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.07.1923","url":null,"abstract":"El artículo está dedicado a verificar la lectura y establecer el texto de una tablilla mágica de Panticapeo. El autor propone un nuevo texto con aparato crítico de la inscripción y discute la nueva interpretación ofrecida recientemente por Eleni Chronopoulou desde el contexto más amplio de las prácticas mágicas en la Antigüedad.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49113324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-02DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2020.01.1940
B. García-hernández
Hasta la colonización de África, ha estado vigente la opinión de que los elefantes indios de Antíoco III, que derrotaron a los libios de Ptolomeo IV en la batalla de Rafia (217 a. C.) descrita por Polibio, eran de tamaño superior. Tito Livio lo confirma a propósito de la batalla de Magnesia (190 a. C.). Sin embargo, el empleo de μέγεθος sugiere un significado diferente de magnitudo, de manera que el error atribuido a Polibio no es tal. Mientras el historiador romano se atiene a la idea de la corpulencia individual de una y otra especie de elefantes, el griego tiene en cuenta la magnitud del conjunto de la unidad táctica. La clave interpretativa está en el doble valor del término no marcado de la oposición privativa que forman μέγεθος y πλῆθος, magnitudo y multitudo; pues los dos primeros vocablos representan, además del tamaño individual específico, el concepto genérico de magnitud.
{"title":"La magnitud de los elefantes indios en las batallas de Rafia (Polibio V 84.5-6) y de Magnesia (Livio XXXVII 39.13) ¿Dónde está el error?","authors":"B. García-hernández","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2020.01.1940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.01.1940","url":null,"abstract":"Hasta la colonización de África, ha estado vigente la opinión de que los elefantes indios de Antíoco III, que derrotaron a los libios de Ptolomeo IV en la batalla de Rafia (217 a. C.) descrita por Polibio, eran de tamaño superior. Tito Livio lo confirma a propósito de la batalla de Magnesia (190 a. C.). Sin embargo, el empleo de μέγεθος sugiere un significado diferente de magnitudo, de manera que el error atribuido a Polibio no es tal. Mientras el historiador romano se atiene a la idea de la corpulencia individual de una y otra especie de elefantes, el griego tiene en cuenta la magnitud del conjunto de la unidad táctica. La clave interpretativa está en el doble valor del término no marcado de la oposición privativa que forman μέγεθος y πλῆθος, magnitudo y multitudo; pues los dos primeros vocablos representan, además del tamaño individual específico, el concepto genérico de magnitud.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47814814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-02DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2020.06.1934
S. Grau
El enfrentamiento entre filósofos y personajes poderosos es un elemento habitual en las biografías helenísticas. En ocasiones, este enfrentamiento es simplemente dialéctico, pero no faltan casos de auténticos «martirios» filosóficos paganos cruentos, con persecuciones en toda regla. Estas muertes otorgan al filósofo una heroización celestial, al menos según los epigramas integrados en la peripecia biográfica, seguramente por la asociación con el culto a los tiranicidas y, en general, a los héroes que reciben una muerte violenta en la tradición mitológica. Inspirado, plausiblemente, en la muerte de Sócrates, el tópico se perpetúa en las vidas de los hombres divinos tardoantiguos, donde, sin embargo, no se produce en ningún caso la muerte heroica y divinizante del filósofo, a pesar de que hubiera sido un contrapunto excelente a las actas de martirios cristianos, cuya literatura empieza a florecer precisamente en este período.
{"title":"El enfrentamiento entre filósofos y tiranos, de la biografía helenística a la tardoantigua: evoluciones de un tópico biográfico","authors":"S. Grau","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2020.06.1934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.06.1934","url":null,"abstract":"El enfrentamiento entre filósofos y personajes poderosos es un elemento habitual en las biografías helenísticas. En ocasiones, este enfrentamiento es simplemente dialéctico, pero no faltan casos de auténticos «martirios» filosóficos paganos cruentos, con persecuciones en toda regla. Estas muertes otorgan al filósofo una heroización celestial, al menos según los epigramas integrados en la peripecia biográfica, seguramente por la asociación con el culto a los tiranicidas y, en general, a los héroes que reciben una muerte violenta en la tradición mitológica. Inspirado, plausiblemente, en la muerte de Sócrates, el tópico se perpetúa en las vidas de los hombres divinos tardoantiguos, donde, sin embargo, no se produce en ningún caso la muerte heroica y divinizante del filósofo, a pesar de que hubiera sido un contrapunto excelente a las actas de martirios cristianos, cuya literatura empieza a florecer precisamente en este período.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46164551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-02DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2020.02.2007
Rachel M. Bruzzone, S. Douglas Olson
En Th. III 70.4 se acusa a un grupo de oligarcas de Corcira por ‘cortar estacas’ (τέμνειν χάρακας) ilegalmente en dos santuarios locales. Los comentaristas discuten el significado de esta acusación. Ofrecemos apoyo detallado a la conclusión de Hornblower, según la cual se acusa a los oligarcas corcirenses de cortar árboles jóvenes de terreno sagrado para usarlos como puntales de viñas en sus campos privados. Nuestro argumento sitúa el relato de Tucídides en un marco filológico, ecológico y social más amplio, y sugiere que los detalles de la acusación ayudan a establecer el abuso de recursos naturales controlados por la comunidad y el sistema judicial como fases preliminares en el deterioro social que terminó produciendo la stasis en Corcira e implícitamente también en otros lugares.
{"title":"El crimen de los oligarcas corcirenses (Th. III 70.4)","authors":"Rachel M. Bruzzone, S. Douglas Olson","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2020.02.2007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.02.2007","url":null,"abstract":"En Th. III 70.4 se acusa a un grupo de oligarcas de Corcira por ‘cortar estacas’ (τέμνειν χάρακας) ilegalmente en dos santuarios locales. Los comentaristas discuten el significado de esta acusación. Ofrecemos apoyo detallado a la conclusión de Hornblower, según la cual se acusa a los oligarcas corcirenses de cortar árboles jóvenes de terreno sagrado para usarlos como puntales de viñas en sus campos privados. Nuestro argumento sitúa el relato de Tucídides en un marco filológico, ecológico y social más amplio, y sugiere que los detalles de la acusación ayudan a establecer el abuso de recursos naturales controlados por la comunidad y el sistema judicial como fases preliminares en el deterioro social que terminó produciendo la stasis en Corcira e implícitamente también en otros lugares.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47312973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2020.03.1943
Breno Battistin Sebastiani, Delfim Ferreira Leão
Following the path of Popova’s (2015) enactive approach to narrative, this inquiry focuses on two clusters of metaphors around which Herodotus organized his perceptions about isonomia and demokratia: the cognitive and the pragmatic. Instead of highlighting differences between isonomia and demokratia, we wish to evince cumulative interactions between both concepts, a process that allows us to make sense of one — demokratia — through the other — isonomia. This approach is also helpful to transpose ancient meditations upon democracy to contemporary contexts not because ancient and contemporary democracies look similar, but because those meditations are constituent parts of the democracy-metaphors we currently live by, and whose roots one can see in the attributes Herodotus ascribed to it in III 80-82 and V 66-73.
{"title":"Isonomia, demokratia y enfoque enactivo en Heródoto","authors":"Breno Battistin Sebastiani, Delfim Ferreira Leão","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2020.03.1943","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.03.1943","url":null,"abstract":"Following the path of Popova’s (2015) enactive approach to narrative, this inquiry focuses on two clusters of metaphors around which Herodotus organized his perceptions about isonomia and demokratia: the cognitive and the pragmatic. Instead of highlighting differences between isonomia and demokratia, we wish to evince cumulative interactions between both concepts, a process that allows us to make sense of one — demokratia — through the other — isonomia. This approach is also helpful to transpose ancient meditations upon democracy to contemporary contexts not because ancient and contemporary democracies look similar, but because those meditations are constituent parts of the democracy-metaphors we currently live by, and whose roots one can see in the attributes Herodotus ascribed to it in III 80-82 and V 66-73.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"1 1","pages":"33-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70052105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-30DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2019.14.1904
Arsenio Ferraces Rodríguez
According to Pliny (Nat. XXIX 71), the snake is not a poisonous animal, but could become one during a specific period of time by influence of the moon (neque anguis uenenatus est nisi per mensem luna instigatus). The reading per mensem makes no sense because the ophidians remain in lethargy during winter. Therefore, per mensem cannot be referring to just any month of the year. A passage by Gargilius Martialis and a witness of the indirect tradition of the Naturalis Historia support the correction per messem. This way, the passage becomes transparent and Pliny’s doctrine is consistent with reality: snakes become poisonous in summertime, at the time of harvest (messis).
根据普林尼(Nat. XXIX 71)的说法，蛇不是一种有毒的动物，但在特定的时期内，由于月亮的影响(neque anguis uenenatus est nisi per mensem luna instiatus)，蛇可能会变成有毒的动物。阅读每个月是没有意义的，因为蛇在冬天仍然处于昏睡状态。因此，per mensem不可能指一年中的任何一个月。Gargilius Martialis的一段话和《自然史》的间接传统的见证人都支持每条信息的修正。通过这种方式，文章变得透明，普林尼的学说与现实是一致的:蛇在夏天是有毒的，在收获的时候(混乱)。
{"title":"Ofidios y calor estivo: una enmienda necesaria en el texto de Plinio (Nat. XXIX 71)","authors":"Arsenio Ferraces Rodríguez","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2019.14.1904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.14.1904","url":null,"abstract":"According to Pliny (Nat. XXIX 71), the snake is not a poisonous animal, but could become one during a specific period of time by influence of the moon (neque anguis uenenatus est nisi per mensem luna instigatus). The reading per mensem makes no sense because the ophidians remain in lethargy during winter. Therefore, per mensem cannot be referring to just any month of the year. A passage by Gargilius Martialis and a witness of the indirect tradition of the Naturalis Historia support the correction per messem. This way, the passage becomes transparent and Pliny’s doctrine is consistent with reality: snakes become poisonous in summertime, at the time of harvest (messis).","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"87 1","pages":"305-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44618339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-12DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2019.15.1824
Á. Sánchez-Ostiz
This paper proposes that some structural discontinuities in the latest book by Ammianus can be explained because those sections were added to a first version of the text in a subsequent phase of composition and therefore do not depend on the main source: the digression on the Huns and Alans in XXXI 2, some sections of military narrative (XXXI 6.7-8, 8.7-8, 15.10 and 13) and the physiognomic note at the end of Valens’ obituary. These sections are not entirely integrated into the narrative flow and add points inconsistent with the main arguments in the book XXXI. This helps better understand the historian’s literary technique and some apparent inconsistencies in the last book of the Res Gestae .
{"title":"Fuentes y fases de redacción en el libro XXXI de Amiano Marcelino","authors":"Á. Sánchez-Ostiz","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2019.15.1824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.15.1824","url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes that some structural discontinuities in the latest book by Ammianus can be explained because those sections were added to a first version of the text in a subsequent phase of composition and therefore do not depend on the main source: the digression on the Huns and Alans in XXXI 2, some sections of military narrative (XXXI 6.7-8, 8.7-8, 15.10 and 13) and the physiognomic note at the end of Valens’ obituary. These sections are not entirely integrated into the narrative flow and add points inconsistent with the main arguments in the book XXXI. This helps better understand the historian’s literary technique and some apparent inconsistencies in the last book of the Res Gestae .","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"87 1","pages":"317-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46004576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-12DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2019.16.1916
Daniel López-Cañete Quiles
In the first section of this paper, the interpretations of Ausonius’ passage by Green (1991) and Lolli (1997) are subjected to criticism; the traditional view on praeter iustum is reinforced, and further linguistic and poetic aspects of this expression are explored. In the second section, it is investigated how alternative approaches to Ausonius’ locus, such as that of Green or Barth’s attempted emendation of iustum > nostrum (1624), are consequential to the comparison of Par. praef. uers. 18 with Martial’s VI 28.10 as printed by all editors ( qui fles talia, nil fleas uiator ); it is then argued that the traditional text and interpretation of Ausonius’ line and a revised text of Martial (either qui fles, talia nil fleas, uiator , as punctuated by Salanitro, or qui fles, tale nihil fleas, uiator , as I have suggested elsewhere) are mutually consistent and provide philological support for each other (§§ 2-3).
在本文的第一节中，格林（1991）和罗利（1997）对奥索尼乌斯段落的解读受到了批评；对普鲁斯特姆的传统观点得到了强化，并进一步探讨了这种表达的语言和诗歌方面。在第二节中，研究了Ausonius基因座的替代方法，如Green或Barth试图修正iustum>nostrum（1624）的方法，如何对Par.praef的比较产生影响。uers。18与所有编辑印刷的尚武VI 28.10（qui-fles talia，nil fleas uiator）；然后有人认为，传统文本和对Ausonius行的解释与《尚武》的修订文本（要么是qui-fles，talia nil fleas，uiator，如Salanitro所打断，要么是qui-fles，tale nihil fleas，ui ator，如我在其他地方所建议的）是相互一致的，并为彼此提供了文献学支持（§§2-3）。
{"title":"Ausonio, Par. praef. uers. 15-18 y Marcial VI 28.10","authors":"Daniel López-Cañete Quiles","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2019.16.1916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.16.1916","url":null,"abstract":"In the first section of this paper, the interpretations of Ausonius’ passage by Green (1991) and Lolli (1997) are subjected to criticism; the traditional view on praeter iustum is reinforced, and further linguistic and poetic aspects of this expression are explored. In the second section, it is investigated how alternative approaches to Ausonius’ locus, such as that of Green or Barth’s attempted emendation of iustum > nostrum (1624), are consequential to the comparison of Par. praef. uers. 18 with Martial’s VI 28.10 as printed by all editors ( qui fles talia, nil fleas uiator ); it is then argued that the traditional text and interpretation of Ausonius’ line and a revised text of Martial (either qui fles, talia nil fleas, uiator , as punctuated by Salanitro, or qui fles, tale nihil fleas, uiator , as I have suggested elsewhere) are mutually consistent and provide philological support for each other (§§ 2-3).","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"87 1","pages":"341-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49008208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-12DOI: 10.3989/emerita.2019.11.1925
Rafael J. Gallé Cejudo
The epistolary preface of the Ἐρωτικὰ Παθήματα cannot be interpreted literally without considering the motifs and rhetorical conventions of the prologues. The aim of this article is to offer an analysis of this brief passage from the programmatic assumptions of Hellenistic poetics, with special emphasis on those aspects that could be at the basis of the process of prosification of poetic texts in this period.
{"title":"Sobre la prosificación poética en la obra de Partenio: la carta-prefacio de los Ἐρωτικὰ Παθήματα","authors":"Rafael J. Gallé Cejudo","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2019.11.1925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.11.1925","url":null,"abstract":"The epistolary preface of the Ἐρωτικὰ Παθήματα cannot be interpreted literally without considering the motifs and rhetorical conventions of the prologues. The aim of this article is to offer an analysis of this brief passage from the programmatic assumptions of Hellenistic poetics, with special emphasis on those aspects that could be at the basis of the process of prosification of poetic texts in this period.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"87 1","pages":"227-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49037234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：