Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102603
Amandine Nachtergael , Katrin Solhdju
This paper explores the concept of integration of traditional medicine through a multidisciplinary approach that combines medical humanities and pharmaceutical sciences. While it aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) objective of fostering a harmonious and functional coexistence between conventional medicine and other therapeutic practices to ensure optimal patient care, this paper critically examines the underlying rationale of the WHO’s strategy for achieving this integration. This logic is best illustrated by two of the central concepts that structure the WHO’s discourse on T&CM1: Integration and Evidence-Based. Both inform research-funding decisions, most notably in the cooperation for development sector, and have a decisive influence on public health policies. In most parts of the world, the necessity for an evidence-based integration of T&CM functions like a mantra, rarely questioned by researchers within the medical or the social sciences, or by governmental and non-governmental actors. Consequently, the present paper problematizes the “evidence-based integration” of “traditional” medicines by challenging some of the key assumptions underpinning these concepts. In doing so, it aims to identify and highlight several elements that may serve as guides on the way to ethically and epistemologically more sound frameworks for the co-existence of modern and traditional medicines.
{"title":"Rethinking “Evidence” in Traditional Medicine “Integration”","authors":"Amandine Nachtergael , Katrin Solhdju","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102603","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102603","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the concept of integration of traditional medicine through a multidisciplinary approach that combines medical humanities and pharmaceutical sciences. While it aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) objective of fostering a harmonious and functional coexistence between conventional medicine and other therapeutic practices to ensure optimal patient care, this paper critically examines the underlying rationale of the WHO’s strategy for achieving this integration. This logic is best illustrated by two of the central concepts that structure the WHO’s discourse on T&CM<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span>: Integration and Evidence-Based. Both inform research-funding decisions, most notably in the cooperation for development sector, and have a decisive influence on public health policies. In most parts of the world, the necessity for an evidence-based integration of T&CM functions like a mantra, rarely questioned by researchers within the medical or the social sciences, or by governmental and non-governmental actors. Consequently, the present paper problematizes the “evidence-based integration” of “traditional” medicines by challenging some of the key assumptions underpinning these concepts. In doing so, it aims to identify and highlight several elements that may serve as guides on the way to ethically and epistemologically more sound frameworks for the co-existence of modern and traditional medicines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145920940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a common diagnostic procedure for infertility but often causes pain and anxiety. Non-pharmacological interventions offer potential alternatives to pharmacological pain management.
Methods
A systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines where a search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, DynaMed, Clinical Key, MEDLINE, and Airiti Library, published before December 2024. The Cochrane RoB (Risk of Bias) 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria were applied to evaluate study evidence.
Results
Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, covering educational counseling, virtual reality (VR), music therapy, mobile-assisted education (MAEC), and acupoint warming therapy. Educational counseling improved patient preparedness and reduced pain, technology-assisted interventions diverted attention, and acupoint warming therapy with music provided dual physiological and psychological benefits. It was also observed that anxiety was reduced in three related articles although study quality varied, with some limitations in blinding and sample size.
Conclusion
Non-pharmacological interventions reduced pain (low certainty) and anxiety (very low certainty) during hysterosalpingography. Concerns remain about the methodological quality, small sample sizes, heterogeneity in the interventions, and for anxiety outcomes, inconsistent effects. Further high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal application, refine implementation, and support evidence-based application.
子宫输卵管造影(HSG)是一种常见的不孕症诊断方法,但经常引起疼痛和焦虑。非药物干预提供了潜在的替代药物疼痛管理。方法按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价,采用检索策略从PubMed、CINAHL Plus全文、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、DynaMed、Clinical Key、MEDLINE和Airiti Library等数据库中提取2024年12月前发表的文章。采用Cochrane RoB (Risk of Bias) 2.0工具评估偏倚风险,采用GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)标准评估研究证据。结果8项随机对照试验(rct)符合纳入标准,涵盖教育咨询、虚拟现实(VR)、音乐治疗、移动辅助教育(MAEC)和穴位温疗。教育咨询改善了病人的准备,减少了疼痛,技术辅助干预转移了注意力,穴位温热疗法与音乐提供了双重生理和心理上的好处。还观察到,尽管研究质量各不相同,在盲法和样本量方面存在一些限制,但三篇相关文章的焦虑程度有所降低。结论非药物干预减少了子宫输卵管造影时的疼痛(低确定性)和焦虑(极低确定性)。对方法质量、小样本量、干预措施的异质性以及焦虑结果不一致的影响的担忧仍然存在。需要进一步的高质量研究来确定最佳应用,改进实施,并支持循证应用。
{"title":"Non-pharmacological interventions for reducing pain and anxiety in women experiencing infertility undergoing hysterosalpingography: A systematic review without meta-analysis","authors":"Shu-Hsien Fang , Ping-Shaou Yu , Bih-O Lee , Chien-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102609","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102609","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a common diagnostic procedure for infertility but often causes pain and anxiety. Non-pharmacological interventions offer potential alternatives to pharmacological pain management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines where a search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, DynaMed, Clinical Key, MEDLINE, and Airiti Library, published before December 2024. The Cochrane RoB (Risk of Bias) 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria were applied to evaluate study evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, covering educational counseling, virtual reality (VR), music therapy, mobile-assisted education (MAEC), and acupoint warming therapy. Educational counseling improved patient preparedness and reduced pain, technology-assisted interventions diverted attention, and acupoint warming therapy with music provided dual physiological and psychological benefits. It was also observed that anxiety was reduced in three related articles although study quality varied, with some limitations in blinding and sample size.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-pharmacological interventions reduced pain (low certainty) and anxiety (very low certainty) during hysterosalpingography. Concerns remain about the methodological quality, small sample sizes, heterogeneity in the interventions, and for anxiety outcomes, inconsistent effects. Further high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal application, refine implementation, and support evidence-based application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102605
Debasis Behera , Prem Venkatesan , Mark P Jensen , Dharmanand Balebail Gopalakrishna , Abhishek Patil , Vani Lakshmi R
Introduction
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is among the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders that significantly affects the quality of life of those with this condition. Clinical hypnosis is a psychological intervention that can be used to reduce the intensity and impact of chronic pain. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have concluded that clinical hypnosis is effective for general chronic pain conditions; however, meta-analytic research on its impact specifically on CLBP remains scarce. This study protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy of hypnosis in reducing pain and associated symptoms in individuals with CLBP, as investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methodology
The review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PEDro, ScieELO, and LILACS) will be conducted to retrieve relevant studies published up to the date that we conduct the primary analyses, and then repeated just before we submit the article (with any additional articles identified incorporated into the review). Studies with RCTs, involving adults with CLBP (≥3 months), where hypnosis intervention was used as monotherapy or an adjunct therapy, will be eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome will be pain intensity, while secondary outcomes will include disability, sleep disturbances, and adverse events. Selection of studies, extraction of relevant data, and assessing risk of bias using Cochrane risk of bias tool-2 will be performed by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies will be addressed through mutual discussion or by consulting a third independent reviewer if required. Meta-analysis will be performed using standardized mean differences for pain and secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity will be assessed and subgroup analyses are planned.
Conclusion
The review will provide an extensive overview of the available evidence on the efficacy of hypnosis on individuals with CLBP and identify knowledge. The results are intended to support the development of clinical recommendations and assist healthcare providers who are considering incorporating clinical hypnosis into interdisciplinary pain management strategies.
Trial Registration
PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251016398 on 29th March 2025.
慢性腰痛(CLBP)是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一,严重影响患者的生活质量。临床催眠是一种心理干预,可用于减少慢性疼痛的强度和影响。系统综述和荟萃分析得出结论,临床催眠对一般慢性疼痛状况有效;然而,关于其对CLBP影响的meta分析研究仍然很少。本研究方案描述了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,旨在评估催眠在减轻CLBP患者疼痛和相关症状方面的疗效,该研究在随机对照试验(RCTs)中进行了调查。评价将按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。我们将对8个电子数据库(Scopus、PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、EMBASE、PEDro、ScieELO和LILACS)进行全面检索,检索到我们进行初步分析的日期之前发表的相关研究,然后在我们提交文章之前进行重复检索(任何确定纳入综述的其他文章)。涉及CLBP成人(≥3个月)的随机对照试验,其中催眠干预作为单一治疗或辅助治疗,将符合纳入条件。主要结局是疼痛强度,次要结局包括残疾、睡眠障碍和不良事件。研究的选择、相关数据的提取以及使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具-2评估偏倚风险将由两位独立的审稿人完成。任何差异将通过相互讨论或咨询第三方独立审查员(如有必要)来解决。将使用疼痛和次要结局的标准化平均差异进行meta分析。将评估异质性并计划进行亚组分析。结论:本综述将对催眠对CLBP患者的有效性和识别知识的现有证据进行广泛的概述。研究结果旨在支持临床建议的发展,并协助正在考虑将临床催眠纳入跨学科疼痛管理策略的医疗保健提供者。试验注册号prospero 2025 CRD420251016398,于2025年3月29日。
{"title":"The efficacy of hypnosis in chronic low back pain: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Debasis Behera , Prem Venkatesan , Mark P Jensen , Dharmanand Balebail Gopalakrishna , Abhishek Patil , Vani Lakshmi R","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102605","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102605","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is among the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders that significantly affects the quality of life of those with this condition. Clinical hypnosis is a psychological intervention that can be used to reduce the intensity and impact of chronic pain. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have concluded that clinical hypnosis is effective for general chronic pain conditions; however, meta-analytic research on its impact specifically on CLBP remains scarce. This study protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy of hypnosis in reducing pain and associated symptoms in individuals with CLBP, as investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PEDro, ScieELO, and LILACS) will be conducted to retrieve relevant studies published up to the date that we conduct the primary analyses, and then repeated just before we submit the article (with any additional articles identified incorporated into the review). Studies with RCTs, involving adults with CLBP (≥3 months), where hypnosis intervention was used as monotherapy or an adjunct therapy, will be eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome will be pain intensity, while secondary outcomes will include disability, sleep disturbances, and adverse events. Selection of studies, extraction of relevant data, and assessing risk of bias using Cochrane risk of bias tool-2 will be performed by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies will be addressed through mutual discussion or by consulting a third independent reviewer if required. Meta-analysis will be performed using standardized mean differences for pain and secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity will be assessed and subgroup analyses are planned.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The review will provide an extensive overview of the available evidence on the efficacy of hypnosis on individuals with CLBP and identify knowledge. The results are intended to support the development of clinical recommendations and assist healthcare providers who are considering incorporating clinical hypnosis into interdisciplinary pain management strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251016398 on 29th March 2025.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102604
Tina Stone , Alison Short , Caroline Smith
Introduction
Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia is persistent and can lead to functional disability and a reduced quality of life. Although cognitive remediation is recommended in clinical guidelines, access in Australia remains inconsistent, and implementation and participation barriers limit its effectiveness. Cognitively stimulating activities, particularly music therapy, could offer an alternative approach, although limited research has examined its feasibility within Australian mental health services. This exploratory mixed-methods survey aimed to understand mental health clinicians’ perspectives on: (1) the cognitive health interventions available within their services, (2) the challenges and facilitators involved in implementing these interventions, and (3) the potential for using music therapy as a cognitively stimulating activity for adults with schizophrenia.
Methods
A mixed methods purpose-designed online survey was conducted across six months with qualified mental health clinicians in Australia. Snowball sampling was utilised for recruitment. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics, and qualitative responses underwent a five-stage reflexive thematic analysis. Both types of data were analysed simultaneously using an integrated approach.
Results
A total of 37 clinicians completed the survey. More than half of respondents (56.7 %) reported that cognitive remediation programs were available at their mental health service, while 89.3 % noted the availability of cognitively stimulating activities. The main implementation challenges reported were discharge timing, lack of training, staffing issues, insufficient resources, and difficulties engaging consumers. Enablers included applying evidence-based practice, personalising interventions, and prioritising recovery goals. Participants viewed music therapy as helpful for improving attention, memory, and communication.
Conclusion
The findings of this study show that clinicians value cognitive health interventions for schizophrenia but face significant implementation challenges, particularly a lack of training, insufficient resources, and staffing constraints. Music therapy is seen as a promising cognitively stimulating activity that may help overcome accessibility, engagement, and resource barriers. Further research is necessary to assess the feasibility of using music therapy to support adults with schizophrenia in improving their cognitive skills.
{"title":"Implementation of cognitive health interventions for schizophrenia: A survey of mental health clinicians’ perceived challenges and enablers","authors":"Tina Stone , Alison Short , Caroline Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102604","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102604","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia is persistent and can lead to functional disability and a reduced quality of life. Although cognitive remediation is recommended in clinical guidelines, access in Australia remains inconsistent, and implementation and participation barriers limit its effectiveness. Cognitively stimulating activities, particularly music therapy, could offer an alternative approach, although limited research has examined its feasibility within Australian mental health services. This exploratory mixed-methods survey aimed to understand mental health clinicians’ perspectives on: (1) the cognitive health interventions available within their services, (2) the challenges and facilitators involved in implementing these interventions, and (3) the potential for using music therapy as a cognitively stimulating activity for adults with schizophrenia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed methods purpose-designed online survey was conducted across six months with qualified mental health clinicians in Australia. Snowball sampling was utilised for recruitment. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics, and qualitative responses underwent a five-stage reflexive thematic analysis. Both types of data were analysed simultaneously using an integrated approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 37 clinicians completed the survey. More than half of respondents (56.7 %) reported that cognitive remediation programs were available at their mental health service, while 89.3 % noted the availability of cognitively stimulating activities. The main implementation challenges reported were discharge timing, lack of training, staffing issues, insufficient resources, and difficulties engaging consumers. Enablers included applying evidence-based practice, personalising interventions, and prioritising recovery goals. Participants viewed music therapy as helpful for improving attention, memory, and communication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this study show that clinicians value cognitive health interventions for schizophrenia but face significant implementation challenges, particularly a lack of training, insufficient resources, and staffing constraints. Music therapy is seen as a promising cognitively stimulating activity that may help overcome accessibility, engagement, and resource barriers. Further research is necessary to assess the feasibility of using music therapy to support adults with schizophrenia in improving their cognitive skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102601
Shu-Yuan Chen , Yu-Quan Mao , Yang-Ying Xu , Duan Li , Shan-Shan Li , Miao Huang , Yu-Jie Li , Xue-Yu Wang , Yu-Peng Jia , Xiao-Wen Liu , Cui-Fang Hao , Xin Du
Introduction
Acupuncture therapy has been widely used as a complementary and alternative treatment for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) procedures in clinical practice worldwide. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the impact of acupuncture therapy on the pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing their first FET and to identify the population most responsive to acupuncture.
Methods
This retrospective cohort analysis included clinical data from 2830 patients who underwent their first cycle of FET at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Women and Children's Hospital, affiliated with Qingdao University, from March 2021 to March 2024. Patients were divided into a control group undergoing routine FET without acupuncture (n = 1085) and an acupuncture group receiving routine FET plus acupuncture performed before and after the transfer day (n = 1745). Generalized linear and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze and adjust for potential confounding factors to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.
Results
The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate in the acupuncture group were higher than those in the control group (54.56 % vs. 48.85 %; adjusted odds ratios [aOR]=1.184, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.011–1.387; p = 0.036; and 43.59 % vs. 39.17 %; aOR=0.034, 95 %CI=1.011–1.387; p = 0.045). There was no significant difference in the biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, or live birth rate between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Stratified analysis showed that acupuncture increased the likelihood of clinical pregnancy (aOR=1.225, 95 %CI=1.001–1.499; p = 0.048) in women <35 years, but had no effect in women ≥35 years. Acupuncture was associated with a higher implantation rate (aOR=1.053, 95 %CI=1.013–1.095; p = 0.009), clinical pregnancy (aOR=1.256, 95 %CI=1.054–1.496; p = 0.011), and biochemical pregnancy (aOR=1.229, 95 %CI=1.025–1.473; p = 0.026) in women with normal ovarian reserve function, but showed no significant effect in those with decreased ovarian reserve function.
Conclusion
Acupuncture therapy can improve the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in the first cycle of FET, and appears more beneficial in women <35 years and those with normal ovarian reserve function, without associated adverse effects, indicating high safety. Nonetheless, more high-quality multicenter prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.
在世界各地的临床实践中,针灸疗法已被广泛用作冻融胚胎移植(FET)手术的补充和替代治疗。在此,我们旨在评估针灸治疗对首次FET患者妊娠结局的影响,并确定对针灸最敏感的人群。方法回顾性队列分析纳入了青岛大学附属妇幼医院生殖医学中心于2021年3月至2024年3月接受第一周期FET治疗的2830例患者的临床资料。将患者分为对照组(1085例)和针刺组(1745例),分别在转移日前后进行常规FET +针刺治疗。采用广义线性和二元logistic回归模型分析和调整潜在的混杂因素,评价针刺对两组妊娠结局的影响。结果针刺组临床妊娠率和植入率均高于对照组(54.56%比48.85%,校正优势比[aOR]=1.184, 95%可信区间[CI] =1.011 ~ 1.387, p = 0.036; 43.59%比39.17%,aOR=0.034, 95% CI=1.011 ~ 1.387, p = 0.045)。两组患者生化妊娠率、流产率、活产率差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。分层分析显示,针刺可增加35岁以下妇女临床妊娠的可能性(aOR=1.225, 95% CI= 1.001-1.499; p = 0.048),但对35岁以上妇女无影响。针刺与卵巢储备功能正常的女性较高的着床率(aOR=1.053, 95% CI=1.013 ~ 1.095, p = 0.009)、临床妊娠(aOR=1.256, 95% CI=1.054 ~ 1.496, p = 0.011)、生化妊娠(aOR=1.229, 95% CI=1.025 ~ 1.473, p = 0.026)相关,而对卵巢储备功能下降的女性无显著影响。结论针刺疗法可提高FET第一周期的着床率和临床妊娠率,且在35岁及卵巢储备功能正常的女性中效果更佳,且无相关不良反应,安全性高。然而,需要更多高质量的多中心前瞻性随机对照试验来进一步证实这些发现。
{"title":"Impact of acupuncture therapy on pregnancy outcome of patients with the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Shu-Yuan Chen , Yu-Quan Mao , Yang-Ying Xu , Duan Li , Shan-Shan Li , Miao Huang , Yu-Jie Li , Xue-Yu Wang , Yu-Peng Jia , Xiao-Wen Liu , Cui-Fang Hao , Xin Du","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102601","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102601","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acupuncture therapy has been widely used as a complementary and alternative treatment for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) procedures in clinical practice worldwide. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the impact of acupuncture therapy on the pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing their first FET and to identify the population most responsive to acupuncture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort analysis included clinical data from 2830 patients who underwent their first cycle of FET at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Women and Children's Hospital, affiliated with Qingdao University, from March 2021 to March 2024. Patients were divided into a control group undergoing routine FET without acupuncture (<em>n</em> = 1085) and an acupuncture group receiving routine FET plus acupuncture performed before and after the transfer day (<em>n</em> = 1745). Generalized linear and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze and adjust for potential confounding factors to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate in the acupuncture group were higher than those in the control group (54.56 % vs. 48.85 %; adjusted odds ratios [aOR]=1.184, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.011–1.387; <em>p</em> = 0.036; and 43.59 % vs. 39.17 %; aOR=0.034, 95 %CI=1.011–1.387; <em>p</em> = 0.045). There was no significant difference in the biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, or live birth rate between the two groups (all <em>p</em> > 0.05). Stratified analysis showed that acupuncture increased the likelihood of clinical pregnancy (aOR=1.225, 95 %CI=1.001–1.499; <em>p</em> = 0.048) in women <35 years, but had no effect in women ≥35 years. Acupuncture was associated with a higher implantation rate (aOR=1.053, 95 %CI=1.013–1.095; <em>p</em> = 0.009), clinical pregnancy (aOR=1.256, 95 %CI=1.054–1.496; <em>p</em> = 0.011), and biochemical pregnancy (aOR=1.229, 95 %CI=1.025–1.473; <em>p</em> = 0.026) in women with normal ovarian reserve function, but showed no significant effect in those with decreased ovarian reserve function.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Acupuncture therapy can improve the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in the first cycle of FET, and appears more beneficial in women <35 years and those with normal ovarian reserve function, without associated adverse effects, indicating high safety. Nonetheless, more high-quality multicenter prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The TREATS™ protocol was developed in 2023 to improve the quality of reporting of clinical aromatherapy studies. Whilst there has been an increase in the number of studies in the last twenty years, these are often poorly conducted and reported on. The TREATS™ contains 38 points giving an overall rating of the research as either poor, fair or good. The protocol has not been widely tested outside of its development.
Methods
This project tested the feasibility of using of the tool on forty-three randomised controlled trials involving clinical aromatherapy published between 2024–2025. The tool was used to score each of the studies to provide a perspective of the quality of current clinical aromatherapy research.
Results
The project found that whilst the tool was easy to use once adapted for multiple studies, and provided a good starting point to evaluate quality, there are recommendations to enhance future iterations of the tool. The overall quality of published studies remains poor to fair according to the tool, with many areas for improvement required.
Conclusion
The TREATS™ is effective as an initial screening tool to evaluate the quality of clinical aromatherapy research, however the quality of extant research remains poor to fair.
{"title":"Evaluating the feasibility of using the TREATS tool in determining the quality of randomised trials of clinical aromatherapy","authors":"Wendy Maddocks , Teresa Barron , Yasmine EIGhamrawy , Ying Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102600","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102600","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The TREATS™ protocol was developed in 2023 to improve the quality of reporting of clinical aromatherapy studies. Whilst there has been an increase in the number of studies in the last twenty years, these are often poorly conducted and reported on. The TREATS™ contains 38 points giving an overall rating of the research as either poor, fair or good. The protocol has not been widely tested outside of its development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This project tested the feasibility of using of the tool on forty-three randomised controlled trials involving clinical aromatherapy published between 2024–2025. The tool was used to score each of the studies to provide a perspective of the quality of current clinical aromatherapy research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The project found that whilst the tool was easy to use once adapted for multiple studies, and provided a good starting point to evaluate quality, there are recommendations to enhance future iterations of the tool. The overall quality of published studies remains poor to fair according to the tool, with many areas for improvement required.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The TREATS™ is effective as an initial screening tool to evaluate the quality of clinical aromatherapy research, however the quality of extant research remains poor to fair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102598
GuanChao Chen , WeiYu Wang , HangYu Li , Hong Zhang
Introduction
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of scalp acupuncture (SA) on swallowing function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia (PSD).
Methods
China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Database, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 26 April 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0). Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 18.0.
Results
Eighteen eligible papers, involving 1410 patients with PSD, were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared to conventional interventions alone, SA combined with conventional interventions significantly reduced water swallowing test (WST) scores [SMD=-1.00, 95 % CI (-1.35, -0.66), Z=-5.701, P = 0.000], reduced standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) scores [MD=-3.78, 95 % CI (-4.89, -2.68), Z=- 6.692, P = 0.000], increased swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) scores [MD = 33.26, 95 % CI (12.79, 53.73), Z = 3.185, P = 0.001], reduced videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) scores [MD = 6.28, 95 % CI (4.01, 8.55), Z = 5.419, P = 0.000], and increased Barthel index (BI) scores [MD = 11.62, 95 % CI (9.76, 13.48), Z = 12.248, P = 0.000]. The WST scores, SSA scores, and SWAL-QOL scores exhibited high heterogeneity. A funnel plot suggested no publication bias in WST scores (t = 0.78, P = 0.457). Sensitivity analysis showed strong robustness in the meta-analysis results for WST scores and SSA scores, while potential sources of heterogeneity were identified in SWAL-QOL scores. The quality of evidence was low for SWAL-QOL scores and high for the remaining scores.
Conclusion
Compared with conventional interventions alone, SA combined with conventional interventions has more advantages in improving the scores in WST, SSA, and SWAL-QOL in the treatment of PSD. However, the reliability of this conclusion is constrained by the low quality of evidence for outcome measures, the lack of regular follow-up, and the unclear risk of adverse events. To consolidate research findings and provide more reliable clinical guidance, future studies should prioritize conducting multicenter double-blind trials that incorporate regular follow-up, objective assessments, and standardized protocols.
本研究旨在评价头皮针刺(SA)对脑卒中后吞咽困难(PSD)患者吞咽功能的安全性和可行性。方法检索自建库至2025年4月26日的中国知网、万方数据、维普数据库、中国医学信息网、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和Web of Science数据库。采用Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0)评估偏倚风险。采用Stata 18.0进行统计学分析。结果共纳入18篇符合条件的文献,涉及1410例PSD患者。meta分析显示,与单独进行常规干预相比,SA联合常规干预显著降低了水吞咽试验(WST)评分[SMD=-1.00, 95% CI (-1.35, -0.66), Z=-5.701, P = 0.000],降低了标准化吞咽评估(SSA)评分[MD=-3.78, 95% CI (-4.89, -2.68), Z=- 6.692, P = 0.000],提高了吞咽生活质量(swa - qol)评分[MD= 33.26, 95% CI (12.79, 53.73), Z= 3.185, P = 0.001],提高了吞咽质量评分[MD= 33.26, 95% CI (12.79, 53.73), Z= 3.185, P = 0.001]。影像透视吞咽困难量表(VDS)评分降低[MD = 6.28, 95% CI (4.01, 8.55), Z = 5.419, P = 0.000], Barthel指数(BI)评分升高[MD = 11.62, 95% CI (9.76, 13.48), Z = 12.248, P = 0.000]。WST评分、SSA评分和sal - qol评分均表现出较高的异质性。漏斗图显示WST评分无发表偏倚(t = 0.78, P = 0.457)。敏感性分析显示,WST评分和SSA评分的meta分析结果具有很强的稳健性,而sal - qol评分则存在潜在的异质性来源。SWAL-QOL评分的证据质量较低,其余评分的证据质量较高。结论与单纯常规干预相比,SA联合常规干预在提高PSD患者WST、SSA、swa - qol评分方面更有优势。然而,这一结论的可靠性受到结果测量证据质量低、缺乏定期随访和不良事件风险不明确的限制。为了巩固研究成果并提供更可靠的临床指导,未来的研究应优先开展多中心双盲试验,包括定期随访、客观评估和标准化方案。
{"title":"Effects and safety of scalp acupuncture on swallowing function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia: A meta-analysis","authors":"GuanChao Chen , WeiYu Wang , HangYu Li , Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102598","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102598","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of scalp acupuncture (SA) on swallowing function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia (PSD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Database, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 26 April 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0). Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 18.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen eligible papers, involving 1410 patients with PSD, were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared to conventional interventions alone, SA combined with conventional interventions significantly reduced water swallowing test (WST) scores [SMD=-1.00, 95 % CI (-1.35, -0.66), <em>Z</em>=-5.701, <em>P</em> = 0.000], reduced standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) scores [MD=-3.78, 95 % CI (-4.89, -2.68), <em>Z</em>=- 6.692, <em>P</em> = 0.000], increased swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) scores [MD = 33.26, 95 % CI (12.79, 53.73), <em>Z</em> = 3.185, <em>P</em> = 0.001], reduced videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) scores [MD = 6.28, 95 % CI (4.01, 8.55), <em>Z</em> = 5.419, <em>P</em> = 0.000], and increased Barthel index (BI) scores [MD = 11.62, 95 % CI (9.76, 13.48), <em>Z</em> = 12.248, <em>P</em> = 0.000]. The WST scores, SSA scores, and SWAL-QOL scores exhibited high heterogeneity. A funnel plot suggested no publication bias in WST scores (<em>t</em> = 0.78, <em>P</em> = 0.457). Sensitivity analysis showed strong robustness in the meta-analysis results for WST scores and SSA scores, while potential sources of heterogeneity were identified in SWAL-QOL scores. The quality of evidence was low for SWAL-QOL scores and high for the remaining scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared with conventional interventions alone, SA combined with conventional interventions has more advantages in improving the scores in WST, SSA, and SWAL-QOL in the treatment of PSD. However, the reliability of this conclusion is constrained by the low quality of evidence for outcome measures, the lack of regular follow-up, and the unclear risk of adverse events. To consolidate research findings and provide more reliable clinical guidance, future studies should prioritize conducting multicenter double-blind trials that incorporate regular follow-up, objective assessments, and standardized protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102596
Afeez A. Soladoye , David B. Olawade , Joseph E. Origbo , Kobloobase O. Usani , Ayomide Israel Adekoya , Ojima Z. Wada , Augustus Osborne
Introduction
Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) reduces neonatal mortality and improves thermoregulation and breastfeeding, yet uptake remains inconsistent in Sierra Leone. Predictive and explainable tools could target implementation where the need is most significant and resources are scarce. This study aimed to predict KMC adoption and identify actionable predictors using explainable machine learning.
Methods
We analysed a nationally representative dataset from Sierra Leone comprising 7737 births. The study setting was Sierra Leone's healthcare system, with participants including mothers who delivered in health facilities. Following data preprocessing (imputation, MinMax normalisation, categorical encoding, and SMOTE for class imbalance), forward-backward selection reduced 22 candidate variables to 10 key predictors. Five classifiers were trained using a 70:30 stratified split: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost. The outcome was KMC adoption (binary: received/not received). Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. Interpretability was achieved through SHAP and LIME for global and local explanations.
Results
XGBoost performed best (accuracy 0.72, precision 0.75, recall 0.81, F1 0.78, ROC AUC 0.7685), followed by Random Forest. Predictors associated with KMC included delivery by caesarean section, type of birth, maternal employment, number of antenatal visits, place of delivery, health insurance coverage, and region, while sampling design variables captured contextual heterogeneity. SHAP and LIME consistently highlighted delivery characteristics and socio-economic factors as primary drivers.
Conclusion
Explainable ensemble models can flag infants likely to receive or miss KMC and indicate modifiable levers for improvement. High recall supports use as a screening aid to prioritise counselling, facility preparedness, and postnatal support. Prospective validation, threshold calibration, and integration within routine health information systems are warranted to translate these insights into sustained increases in KMC coverage in Sierra Leone and similar settings.
袋鼠妈妈护理(KMC)降低了新生儿死亡率,改善了体温调节和母乳喂养,但在塞拉利昂,这种做法仍然不一致。可预测和可解释的工具可以针对需求最大且资源稀缺的地方实施。本研究旨在预测KMC的采用,并使用可解释的机器学习识别可操作的预测因子。方法我们分析了塞拉利昂具有全国代表性的数据集,其中包括7737名新生儿。研究背景是塞拉利昂的医疗保健系统,参与者包括在医疗机构分娩的母亲。在进行数据预处理(imputation、MinMax归一化、分类编码和针对类不平衡的SMOTE)后,向前向后选择将22个候选变量减少到10个关键预测因子。使用70:30分层分割训练五个分类器:k -最近邻(KNN),逻辑回归(LR),支持向量机(SVM),随机森林(RF)和XGBoost。结果是KMC采用(二进制:接收/未接收)。使用准确性、精密度、召回率、f1评分和ROC-AUC对性能进行评估。通过SHAP和LIME实现了全球和局部解释的可解释性。结果xgboost表现最佳(正确率0.72,精密度0.75,召回率0.81,F1 0.78, ROC AUC 0.7685), Random Forest次之。与KMC相关的预测因子包括剖腹产分娩、分娩类型、产妇就业、产前检查次数、分娩地点、健康保险覆盖范围和地区,而抽样设计变量捕获了上下文异质性。SHAP和LIME始终强调交付特点和社会经济因素是主要驱动因素。结论可解释的整体模型可以标记婴儿可能接受或错过KMC,并指出改善的可修改杠杆。高回忆支持使用作为筛选援助,优先咨询,设施准备和产后支持。有必要进行前瞻性验证、阈值校准和常规卫生信息系统的整合,以将这些见解转化为塞拉利昂和类似环境中KMC覆盖率的持续增长。
{"title":"Using explainable machine learning to identify predictors of Kangaroo mother care implementation in Sierra Leone's healthcare system","authors":"Afeez A. Soladoye , David B. Olawade , Joseph E. Origbo , Kobloobase O. Usani , Ayomide Israel Adekoya , Ojima Z. Wada , Augustus Osborne","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102596","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102596","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) reduces neonatal mortality and improves thermoregulation and breastfeeding, yet uptake remains inconsistent in Sierra Leone. Predictive and explainable tools could target implementation where the need is most significant and resources are scarce. This study aimed to predict KMC adoption and identify actionable predictors using explainable machine learning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analysed a nationally representative dataset from Sierra Leone comprising 7737 births. The study setting was Sierra Leone's healthcare system, with participants including mothers who delivered in health facilities. Following data preprocessing (imputation, MinMax normalisation, categorical encoding, and SMOTE for class imbalance), forward-backward selection reduced 22 candidate variables to 10 key predictors. Five classifiers were trained using a 70:30 stratified split: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost. The outcome was KMC adoption (binary: received/not received). Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. Interpretability was achieved through SHAP and LIME for global and local explanations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>XGBoost performed best (accuracy 0.72, precision 0.75, recall 0.81, F1 0.78, ROC AUC 0.7685), followed by Random Forest. Predictors associated with KMC included delivery by caesarean section, type of birth, maternal employment, number of antenatal visits, place of delivery, health insurance coverage, and region, while sampling design variables captured contextual heterogeneity. SHAP and LIME consistently highlighted delivery characteristics and socio-economic factors as primary drivers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Explainable ensemble models can flag infants likely to receive or miss KMC and indicate modifiable levers for improvement. High recall supports use as a screening aid to prioritise counselling, facility preparedness, and postnatal support. Prospective validation, threshold calibration, and integration within routine health information systems are warranted to translate these insights into sustained increases in KMC coverage in Sierra Leone and similar settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ayurgenomics, a pioneering approach integrating Ayurveda and genomics, offers a novel perspective to examine inter-individual variability in terms of health, disease susceptibility, and its recovery. This study explores the relationship between Ayurvedic Prakritis (Vata, Pitta, Kapha) and olfactory perception, alongside its underlying genetic expression patterns, to better understand the biological basis of Prakriti classification. This study aimed to examine differences in olfactory perception and olfactory receptor gene expression among individuals with extreme Prakriti types, as classified by Ayurveda, and to explore potential correlations between these molecular variations and Prakriti-specific phenotypes.
Methods
A total of 400 candidates (staff, students and patients attendant) from All India Institute of Ayurveda were initially screened using the CCRAS-SAS. Out of these, 300 healthy participants were enrolled and later assessed for three extreme Prakriti phenotypes Vata, Pitta, and Kapha. Among them, 28 were identified with Ekdoshaja Prakriti and chosen for olfactory perception analysis and 24 participants were selected for olfactory receptor gene expression profiling. Olfactory performance was assessed using the Sniffin Sticks Test, evaluating domains, T-score, D-score, and I-score. Expression levels of olfactory genes were quantified using Quantitative PCR.
Results
Significant differences in olfactory performance were observed across the three Prakriti phenotypes, where Kapha showed the best T score, Pitta showed the best D and I score, and Kapha and Pitta had the best TDI score. OR6K3 gene expression was significantly downregulated in Pitta and Kapha Prakritis. However, OR10Z1 gene expression was upregulated in Kapha relative to the other two Prakriti. We have taken Vata Prakriti as reference. Although the study was conducted on a relatively small sample size, the findings provide valuable preliminary insights into the association between Prakriti types, olfactory perception, and OR gene expression.
Conclusion
This study reveals that individuals from different Prakriti groups display distinct phenotypic traits in olfactory perception along with specific molecular variations. However, these findings should be interpreted in light of the study’s limitations, including a narrow sample drawn from a single institution and a relatively small number of participants. Further studies with larger and more diverse populations are needed to validate these observations.
{"title":"Prakriti-based differences in olfactory perception and receptor gene expression: An Ayurgenomics approach","authors":"Deepika Saini , Heena Saini , Neha Singh , Richa Tripathi , Meera K. Bhojani","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102599","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102599","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ayurgenomics, a pioneering approach integrating Ayurveda and genomics, offers a novel perspective to examine inter-individual variability in terms of health, disease susceptibility, and its recovery. This study explores the relationship between <em>Ayurvedic Prakritis</em> (<em>Vata, Pitta, Kapha</em>) and olfactory perception, alongside its underlying genetic expression patterns, to better understand the biological basis of <em>Prakriti</em> classification. This study aimed to examine differences in olfactory perception and olfactory receptor gene expression among individuals with extreme <em>Prakriti</em> types, as classified by <em>Ayurveda</em>, and to explore potential correlations between these molecular variations and <em>Prakriti</em>-specific phenotypes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 400 candidates (staff, students and patients attendant) from All India Institute of Ayurveda were initially screened using the CCRAS-SAS. Out of these, 300 healthy participants were enrolled and later assessed for three extreme <em>Prakriti</em> phenotypes <em>Vata, Pitta</em>, and <em>Kapha</em>. Among them, 28 were identified with Ekdoshaja Prakriti and chosen for olfactory perception analysis and 24 participants were selected for olfactory receptor gene expression profiling. Olfactory performance was assessed using the <em>Sniffin Sticks Test,</em> evaluating domains, T-score, D-score, and I-score<em>.</em> Expression levels of olfactory genes were quantified using Quantitative PCR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences in olfactory performance were observed across the three Prakriti phenotypes, where Kapha showed the best T score, Pitta showed the best D and I score, and Kapha and <em>Pitta</em> had the best TDI score. OR6K3 gene expression was significantly downregulated in <em>Pitta</em> and <em>Kapha Prakritis.</em> However, OR10Z1 gene expression was upregulated in <em>Kapha</em> relative to the other two <em>Prakriti</em>. We have taken <em>Vata Prakriti</em> as reference<em>.</em> Although the study was conducted on a relatively small sample size, the findings provide valuable preliminary insights into the association between Prakriti types, olfactory perception, and OR gene expression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study reveals that individuals from different <em>Prakriti</em> groups display distinct phenotypic traits in olfactory perception along with specific molecular variations. However, these findings should be interpreted in light of the study’s limitations, including a narrow sample drawn from a single institution and a relatively small number of participants. Further studies with larger and more diverse populations are needed to validate these observations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102597
Aisha Anwar , Tara Ajith , Róisín Lewis , Vickie Kimandi , Andrew J Drakeley , Dharani K Hapangama , Nicola Tempest
Introduction
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) represents a significant health issue among women, profoundly impacting their quality of life. Current treatment modalities primarily include hormonal therapy, analgesics, or surgical interventions, which may have side effects or be unsuitable for women attempting to conceive. The objective of this study is to determine if cannabidiol (CBD) is an acceptable non-hormonal self-management option for women with CPP.
Methods
A prospective, cross sectional observational questionnaire study that included 200 women with CPP who attended the gynaecological department at the Liverpool Women’s Hospital (LWH), UK, over a six-month period. The main outcomes included acceptability of CBD as a non-hormonal treatment option for CPP, current treatments/self-management strategies utilised, and interest in participation in future trials investigating CBD for CPP management.
Results
Sixteen % (n = 32) of the questioned cohort were taking alternative treatments, 16.3 % (n = 26) had tried cannabis (prescribed/illicit), and 21.3 % (n = 34) had tried Hemp/CBD oil as an alternative treatment option. A total of 82.5 % (n = 165) of respondents were willing to try CBD; 73.9 % (n = 139) oral, 69.7 % (n = 131) a skin patch, 72.3 % (n = 136) a balm/gel and 33 % (n = 62) a CBD infused tampon. Most women, 75.5 % (n = 151), revealed their willingness to take part in future trials involving CBD as a treatment option.
Conclusion
CPP remains inadequately treated, leading many women to seek alternative therapies. CBD is considered an acceptable option, with a high proportion of surveyed women reporting current or past use to manage their symptoms.
{"title":"Cannabidiol (CBD): An acceptable non-hormonal treatment option for women suffering with chronic pelvic pain – a cross-sectional observational study","authors":"Aisha Anwar , Tara Ajith , Róisín Lewis , Vickie Kimandi , Andrew J Drakeley , Dharani K Hapangama , Nicola Tempest","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102597","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102597","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) represents a significant health issue among women, profoundly impacting their quality of life. Current treatment modalities primarily include hormonal therapy, analgesics, or surgical interventions, which may have side effects or be unsuitable for women attempting to conceive. The objective of this study is to determine if cannabidiol (CBD) is an acceptable non-hormonal self-management option for women with CPP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, cross sectional observational questionnaire study that included 200 women with CPP who attended the gynaecological department at the Liverpool Women’s Hospital (LWH), UK, over a six-month period. The main outcomes included acceptability of CBD as a non-hormonal treatment option for CPP, current treatments/self-management strategies utilised, and interest in participation in future trials investigating CBD for CPP management.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen % (<em>n</em> = 32) of the questioned cohort were taking alternative treatments, 16.3 % (<em>n</em> = 26) had tried cannabis (prescribed/illicit), and 21.3 % (<em>n</em> = 34) had tried Hemp/CBD oil as an alternative treatment option. A total of 82.5 % (<em>n</em> = 165) of respondents were willing to try CBD; 73.9 % (<em>n</em> = 139) oral, 69.7 % (<em>n</em> = 131) a skin patch, 72.3 % (<em>n</em> = 136) a balm/gel and 33 % (<em>n</em> = 62) a CBD infused tampon. Most women, 75.5 % (<em>n</em> = 151), revealed their willingness to take part in future trials involving CBD as a treatment option.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CPP remains inadequately treated, leading many women to seek alternative therapies. CBD is considered an acceptable option, with a high proportion of surveyed women reporting current or past use to manage their symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}