首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Soil Science最新文献

英文 中文
Biochar-Driven Soil Restoration: Balancing Carbon Sequestration and Ecosystem Recovery in Degraded Lands 生物炭驱动的土壤恢复:退化土地碳固存与生态系统恢复的平衡
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70244
Wei Liu, Guoyao Niu, Chiquan He, Yangyang Ma, Yanxiang Tao, Sihan Liu, Guangqiang Xiang

Grassland degradation poses serious threats to global carbon sequestration capacity and the provision of ecosystem services. This study investigates how pristine and iron-modified biochar derived from apple wood (ABC) and rice straw (RBC) influence soil carbon dynamics and ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) growth in degraded grassland soils. Four biochar treatments (ABC, RBC, Fe-ABC, and Fe-RBC) were tested in a field-scale experiment. Results showed that all biochar amendments increased soil organic carbon (SOC) content, particularly in the Fe-ABC treatment which showed 211% more SOC than the control. Iron-modified biochars (Fe-ABC and Fe-RBC) significantly enhanced plant root length, plant height, and underground dry biomass. However, unmodified ABC achieved the largest carbon pool management index (CPMI = 169.49 ± 16.70), a key indicator that evaluates both the size (storage) and the activity (lability) of the soil carbon pool. This result demonstrates an optimal balance between SOC stabilization and labile carbon maintenance. The Fe-ABC treatment reduced soil inorganic carbon (SIC) content by 23.5%, attributable to carbonate dissolution via acidification (pH decreased from 8.26 to 7.77) and potentially enhanced plant uptake of the dissolved inorganic carbon derivatives. Our findings underscore the importance of application-oriented biochar selection. For degraded grasslands, Fe-ABC was the superior option due to its enhanced capacity for stable SOC formation. Conversely, Fe-RBC demonstrated greater potential for rapid vegetation restoration and productivity enhancement. When a balanced approach to carbon storage and lability is required, ABC emerged as the most suitable amendment, effectively increasing carbon storage without inducing inertness.

草地退化对全球固碳能力和生态系统服务的提供构成严重威胁。本文研究了退化草地土壤中苹果木(ABC)和稻草(RBC)的原始生物炭和铁修饰生物炭对土壤碳动态和黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)生长的影响。四种生物炭处理(ABC、RBC、Fe - ABC和Fe - RBC)在田间规模试验中进行了测试。结果表明,所有生物炭处理均增加了土壤有机碳(SOC)含量,其中Fe - ABC处理的有机碳含量比对照增加了211%。铁修饰生物炭(Fe‐ABC和Fe‐RBC)显著提高了植物的根长、株高和地下干生物量。而未经改良的ABC获得了最大的碳库管理指数(CPMI = 169.49±16.70),这是评价土壤碳库大小(储量)和活性(不稳定性)的关键指标。这一结果证明了有机碳稳定和不稳定碳维持之间的最佳平衡。Fe - ABC处理使土壤无机碳(SIC)含量降低了23.5%,这是由于酸化过程中碳酸盐的溶解(pH从8.26降至7.77),并可能增强了植物对溶解无机碳衍生物的吸收。我们的研究结果强调了以应用为导向的生物炭选择的重要性。对于退化草地,铁- ABC是更好的选择,因为它增强了稳定有机碳形成的能力。相反,Fe‐RBC显示出更大的快速植被恢复和生产力提高的潜力。当需要平衡碳储量和不稳定性时,ABC成为最合适的修正,有效地增加了碳储量而不引起惰性。
{"title":"Biochar-Driven Soil Restoration: Balancing Carbon Sequestration and Ecosystem Recovery in Degraded Lands","authors":"Wei Liu,&nbsp;Guoyao Niu,&nbsp;Chiquan He,&nbsp;Yangyang Ma,&nbsp;Yanxiang Tao,&nbsp;Sihan Liu,&nbsp;Guangqiang Xiang","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70244","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70244","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Grassland degradation poses serious threats to global carbon sequestration capacity and the provision of ecosystem services. This study investigates how pristine and iron-modified biochar derived from apple wood (ABC) and rice straw (RBC) influence soil carbon dynamics and ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L.) growth in degraded grassland soils. Four biochar treatments (ABC, RBC, Fe-ABC, and Fe-RBC) were tested in a field-scale experiment. Results showed that all biochar amendments increased soil organic carbon (SOC) content, particularly in the Fe-ABC treatment which showed 211% more SOC than the control. Iron-modified biochars (Fe-ABC and Fe-RBC) significantly enhanced plant root length, plant height, and underground dry biomass. However, unmodified ABC achieved the largest carbon pool management index (CPMI = 169.49 ± 16.70), a key indicator that evaluates both the size (storage) and the activity (lability) of the soil carbon pool. This result demonstrates an optimal balance between SOC stabilization and labile carbon maintenance. The Fe-ABC treatment reduced soil inorganic carbon (SIC) content by 23.5%, attributable to carbonate dissolution via acidification (pH decreased from 8.26 to 7.77) and potentially enhanced plant uptake of the dissolved inorganic carbon derivatives. Our findings underscore the importance of application-oriented biochar selection. For degraded grasslands, Fe-ABC was the superior option due to its enhanced capacity for stable SOC formation. Conversely, Fe-RBC demonstrated greater potential for rapid vegetation restoration and productivity enhancement. When a balanced approach to carbon storage and lability is required, ABC emerged as the most suitable amendment, effectively increasing carbon storage without inducing inertness.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145559477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time to Retire “Pedology”? Reflecting on Disciplinary Terminology in Soil Science 是时候让“教育学”退休了?对土壤学专业术语的思考
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70240
Gian Franco Capra

The difference between “Pedology” and “Soil Science” is not simply a matter of terminology; it is fundamentally connected to how varied disciplines define their missions, address new emerging challenges, or interact within the scientific, socioeconomic, and cultural landscape at every level (regional, national, and international). This opinion paper aims to initiate a discussion on critically examining whether the continued parallel use of these two terms remains justified in the current scientific context. By considering both the historical context from which we come and future challenges, the article—while acknowledging the undeniable historical and conceptual value of “Pedology”—raises the issue of how its use can become limiting in an era marked by a growing drive toward interdisciplinary collaboration, multidisciplinarity, and ongoing technological innovation. The paper discusses, not claiming to possess the whole truth but simply aiming to open a broader debate, how the univocal adoption of “Soil Science” could serve as a unifying and accessible term, capable of (i) reflecting the current breadth and complexity of the discipline (from biochemical processes to landscape management, food security, and the crucial role of soils in combating climate change) and (ii) ensuring greater inclusiveness and communicative clarity for researchers, professionals, students, policymakers, and society as a whole. The article proposes a shift in language that aligns with current practices in major international journals, scientific societies, international calls, and educational settings at all levels. While honouring the undeniable pedological heritage of the past, such a shift would allow the soil science community to achieve greater recognition on the international stage. In this context, several recommendations are made to foster more balanced and future-oriented terminology for a discipline at the crossroads of tradition and transformation. Without any claim to finality, the paper aims to foster an open and transparent dialogue, encouraging a broad and meaningful cultural debate.

“土壤学”和“土壤学”之间的区别不仅仅是术语的问题;它从根本上与不同的学科如何定义他们的使命,解决新出现的挑战,或在科学、社会经济和文化景观的各个层面(地区、国家和国际)相互作用有关。这篇意见论文的目的是发起一个讨论,批判性地审查是否继续平行使用这两个术语在当前的科学背景下仍然是合理的。考虑到我们所处的历史背景和未来的挑战,这篇文章在承认“土壤学”不可否认的历史和概念价值的同时,提出了一个问题,即在一个以跨学科合作、多学科和持续的技术创新为标志的时代,它的使用如何受到限制。这篇论文并没有声称拥有全部的真相,而只是为了展开一场更广泛的辩论,讨论了“土壤科学”如何作为一个统一的、可理解的术语,能够(i)反映该学科当前的广度和复杂性(从生物化学过程到景观管理、粮食安全和土壤在应对气候变化中的关键作用),(ii)确保研究人员、专业人士更大的包容性和沟通清晰度。学生、政策制定者和整个社会。这篇文章提出了一种语言的转变,使其与主要国际期刊、科学学会、国际电话会议和各级教育机构的当前做法保持一致。在尊重过去不可否认的土壤学遗产的同时,这种转变将使土壤科学界在国际舞台上获得更大的认可。在此背景下,提出了一些建议,以促进在传统和转型的十字路口的学科更平衡和面向未来的术语。本文旨在促进开放和透明的对话,鼓励广泛而有意义的文化辩论,而不主张最终结果。
{"title":"Time to Retire “Pedology”? Reflecting on Disciplinary Terminology in Soil Science","authors":"Gian Franco Capra","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70240","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70240","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The difference between “Pedology” and “Soil Science” is not simply a matter of terminology; it is fundamentally connected to how varied disciplines define their missions, address new emerging challenges, or interact within the scientific, socioeconomic, and cultural landscape at every level (regional, national, and international). This opinion paper aims to initiate a discussion on critically examining whether the continued parallel use of these two terms remains justified in the current scientific context. By considering both the historical context from which we come and future challenges, the article—while acknowledging the undeniable historical and conceptual value of “Pedology”—raises the issue of how its use can become limiting in an era marked by a growing drive toward interdisciplinary collaboration, multidisciplinarity, and ongoing technological innovation. The paper discusses, not claiming to possess the whole truth but simply aiming to open a broader debate, how the univocal adoption of “Soil Science” could serve as a unifying and accessible term, capable of (i) reflecting the current breadth and complexity of the discipline (from biochemical processes to landscape management, food security, and the crucial role of soils in combating climate change) and (ii) ensuring greater inclusiveness and communicative clarity for researchers, professionals, students, policymakers, and society as a whole. The article proposes a shift in language that aligns with current practices in major international journals, scientific societies, international calls, and educational settings at all levels. While honouring the undeniable pedological heritage of the past, such a shift would allow the soil science community to achieve greater recognition on the international stage. In this context, several recommendations are made to foster more balanced and future-oriented terminology for a discipline at the crossroads of tradition and transformation. Without any claim to finality, the paper aims to foster an open and transparent dialogue, encouraging a broad and meaningful cultural debate.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145559480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linking Phosphate Sorption Kinetics With Hysteresis Ratio in Soils of Varying Weathering Intensity 变风化强度土壤中磷酸盐吸附动力学与滞回比的联系
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70235
Abhijit Debnath, Anurup Mazumder
<div> <p>Phosphorus (P) sorption, desorption hysteresis and sorption rates have been extensively studied, but often in isolation. The interrelationship amongst these processes, particularly how the rate of phosphate sorption relates to the hysteresis ratio, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this relationship and identify which parameter serves as a better indicator for managing P availability in soils. We analysed 30 soil samples from five soil orders in India – Entisol, Inceptisol, Vertisol, Alfisol and Ultisol – spanning a gradient from young to highly weathered soils. Phosphorus hysteresis ratios were calculated using a modified Freundlich equation, and sorption rates were determined in selected soils by reacting them with P solutions over time and fitting data to the equation, <span></span><math> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>a</mi> <msup> <mi>c</mi> <msub> <mi>b</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msup> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <msub> <mi>b</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ S=a{c}^{b_1}{t}^{b_2} $$</annotation> </semantics></math>, where <i>S</i> is the amount sorbed, <i>c</i> is the solution concentration, <i>t</i> the time of contact, and <i>a</i>, <i>b</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>b</i><sub>2</sub> are parameters. The P sorption–desorption curves obtained from the isothermal sorption experiment showed substantial variation, leading to a wide range of hysteresis ratios, which remained stable over time. Our results revealed an exponential relationship between hysteresis ratio and the sorption parameter ‘<i>b</i>’, and an inverse relationship with Colwell extractable P. Soils with low native P showed both higher sorption rates (<i>b</i><sub>2</sub>) and hysteresis ratios and their relationships are exponential. The sorption equation parameter ‘<i>a</i>’ was inversely related with the parameter <i>b</i>. We infer that younger, more heterogeneous soils exhibit lower ‘<i>b</i>’ values, whilst highly weathered soils with less site diversity have higher ‘<i>b</i>’ values. Variations in hysteresis ratio emphasized differences in P retention ability and its subsequent diffusion into particles. The study highlights that hysteresis ratio and <i>b</i><sub>2</sub>, both measuring the rate of reaction, are crucial indicators of P behaviour in soils but the hysteresis ratio is a more reliable predictor for guiding fertilizer P management in diverse soil types. The study highlights how soil weathering – and thus soil order – influences sorption characteristics by altering surface heterogeneity.</p>
磷(P)的吸附、解吸滞后和吸附速率已被广泛研究,但往往是孤立的。这些过程之间的相互关系,特别是磷酸吸附速率与迟滞比的关系,仍然不清楚。本研究旨在探讨这种关系,并确定哪个参数可以作为管理土壤磷有效性的更好指标。我们分析了来自印度5个土壤目的30个土壤样本——初生土、初生土、垂直土、Alfisol和最终土——跨越了从年轻土壤到高度风化土壤的梯度。采用修正的Freundlich方程计算磷滞回比,并通过与P溶液随时间的反应来确定所选土壤的吸附速率,并将数据拟合到方程中,其中S为吸附量,c为溶液浓度,t为接触时间,a, b1和b2为参数。等温吸附实验得到的P吸附-解吸曲线变化较大,导致滞回比范围较大,且随时间保持稳定。结果表明,滞回率与吸附参数b呈指数关系,与Colwell可提取磷呈反比关系。土壤中磷含量低,吸附率(b2)和滞回率均较高,且两者呈指数关系。吸附方程参数a与参数b呈负相关。我们推断,较年轻、异质性较强的土壤具有较低的“b”值,而高度风化、场地多样性较少的土壤具有较高的“b”值。迟滞比的变化强调了磷保留能力及其随后向颗粒扩散的差异。研究强调,滞回比和b2都是衡量土壤中磷行为的重要指标,但滞回比是指导不同土壤类型肥料磷管理的更可靠的预测指标。这项研究强调了土壤风化——以及因此而产生的土壤秩序——是如何通过改变表面非均质性来影响吸附特性的。
{"title":"Linking Phosphate Sorption Kinetics With Hysteresis Ratio in Soils of Varying Weathering Intensity","authors":"Abhijit Debnath,&nbsp;Anurup Mazumder","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70235","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70235","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Phosphorus (P) sorption, desorption hysteresis and sorption rates have been extensively studied, but often in isolation. The interrelationship amongst these processes, particularly how the rate of phosphate sorption relates to the hysteresis ratio, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this relationship and identify which parameter serves as a better indicator for managing P availability in soils. We analysed 30 soil samples from five soil orders in India – Entisol, Inceptisol, Vertisol, Alfisol and Ultisol – spanning a gradient from young to highly weathered soils. Phosphorus hysteresis ratios were calculated using a modified Freundlich equation, and sorption rates were determined in selected soils by reacting them with P solutions over time and fitting data to the equation, &lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;math&gt;\u0000 &lt;semantics&gt;\u0000 &lt;mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;S&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 &lt;mo&gt;=&lt;/mo&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;a&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 &lt;msup&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;c&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 &lt;msub&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;b&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 &lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;\u0000 &lt;/msub&gt;\u0000 &lt;/msup&gt;\u0000 &lt;msup&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;t&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 &lt;msub&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;b&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 &lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;\u0000 &lt;/msub&gt;\u0000 &lt;/msup&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;annotation&gt;$$ S=a{c}^{b_1}{t}^{b_2} $$&lt;/annotation&gt;\u0000 &lt;/semantics&gt;&lt;/math&gt;, where &lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt; is the amount sorbed, &lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt; is the solution concentration, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt; the time of contact, and &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; and &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; are parameters. The P sorption–desorption curves obtained from the isothermal sorption experiment showed substantial variation, leading to a wide range of hysteresis ratios, which remained stable over time. Our results revealed an exponential relationship between hysteresis ratio and the sorption parameter ‘&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;’, and an inverse relationship with Colwell extractable P. Soils with low native P showed both higher sorption rates (&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) and hysteresis ratios and their relationships are exponential. The sorption equation parameter ‘&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;’ was inversely related with the parameter &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;. We infer that younger, more heterogeneous soils exhibit lower ‘&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;’ values, whilst highly weathered soils with less site diversity have higher ‘&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;’ values. Variations in hysteresis ratio emphasized differences in P retention ability and its subsequent diffusion into particles. The study highlights that hysteresis ratio and &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, both measuring the rate of reaction, are crucial indicators of P behaviour in soils but the hysteresis ratio is a more reliable predictor for guiding fertilizer P management in diverse soil types. The study highlights how soil weathering – and thus soil order – influences sorption characteristics by altering surface heterogeneity.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145559479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conservation Tillage Increases Carbon Storage by Regulating Mineral-Mediated Aggregate Stability and Carbon Chemistry 保护性耕作通过调节矿物介导的团聚体稳定性和碳化学来增加碳储量
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70233
Zixuan Han, Aurore Degré, Shengping Li, Xiaojun Song, Huizhou Gao, Angyuan Jia, Qiqi Gao, Xueping Wu, Aizhen Liang

Widespread adoption of conservation practices is increasingly encouraged to improve soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and mitigate climate change. However, soil texture and mineralogy cause variable SOC responses under conservation tillage. The role of minerals and organic carbon composition in soil aggregation and SOC stabilization remains insufficiently understood. This study evaluated the long-term effects of conservation tillage (no-tillage with straw return, NTS) versus conventional tillage (plough tillage with straw removal, CT) on carbon storage across Phaeozems, Calcaric Cambisols, and Calcic Luvisols. Compared to CT, NTS increased the annual average C sequestration rate by 15.3%–76.7% and SOC storage by 10.2%–28.4% in different soil types. NTS also increased macroaggregate percentage and mean weight diameter (MWD), resulting in 17.8%–28.3% larger macroaggregate-associated SOC and total nitrogen (TN) contents. Notably, the aromatic-C/aliphatic-C ratio under NTS increased in bulk soil and macroaggregates, which were positively correlated with larger amorphous iron (Feo) content, Ca2+ concentration, and specific surface area in different treatments. Phaeozems exhibit the largest SOC storage, along with larger Feo and Ca2+ contents and aromatic-C/aliphatic-C ratio. However, NTS led to the greatest increases in MWD and SOC storage in Calcaric Cambisols, and the greatest enhancement of microbial biomass carbon in Calcic Luvisols. PLS-PM analysis indicated that although the aromatic-C/aliphatic ratio directly enhances aggregated stability, Feo and Ca2+ promoted MWD indirectly by facilitating greater aromatic-C and polysaccharide-C. Overall, conservation tillage promoted selective binding of Feo and Ca2+ to SOC functional groups, thus enhancing soil aggregation and SOC physico-chemical protection, with calcareous soils showing a stronger response.

越来越多的人鼓励广泛采用保护措施来提高土壤有机碳(SOC)储量和减缓气候变化。然而,土壤质地和矿物学导致保护性耕作下土壤有机碳的变化。矿物和有机碳组成在土壤团聚和有机碳稳定中的作用尚不清楚。本研究评估了保护性耕作(免耕秸秆还田,NTS)与常规耕作(耕耕秸秆还田,CT)对Phaeozems、Calcaric Cambisols和calcalic Luvisols碳储量的长期影响。与CT相比,NTS可使不同土壤类型的年平均碳固存率提高15.3% ~ 76.7%,土壤有机碳储存量提高10.2% ~ 28.4%。NTS还增加了大团聚体百分比和平均重径(MWD),导致大团聚体相关的有机碳(SOC)和总氮(TN)含量增加17.8%-28.3%。值得注意的是,在NTS处理下,土壤和大团聚体中芳香- C/脂肪族- C比值增加,这与不同处理下较大的非晶铁(Feo)含量、ca2 +浓度和比表面积呈正相关。Phaeozems具有最大的SOC储存量,以及较大的Feo和ca2 +含量和芳族- C/脂肪族- C比值。然而,NTS对钙质camvisols的MWD和SOC储量的增加最大,对钙质Luvisols的微生物生物量碳的增加最大。PLS - PM分析表明,虽然芳香族- C/脂肪族比例直接提高了聚集稳定性,但Feo和ca2 +通过促进芳香族- C和多糖- C的增加间接促进了MWD。总体而言,保护性耕作促进了Feo和ca2 +与有机碳官能团的选择性结合,从而增强了土壤团聚和有机碳的物理化学保护作用,其中钙质土壤表现出更强的响应。
{"title":"Conservation Tillage Increases Carbon Storage by Regulating Mineral-Mediated Aggregate Stability and Carbon Chemistry","authors":"Zixuan Han,&nbsp;Aurore Degré,&nbsp;Shengping Li,&nbsp;Xiaojun Song,&nbsp;Huizhou Gao,&nbsp;Angyuan Jia,&nbsp;Qiqi Gao,&nbsp;Xueping Wu,&nbsp;Aizhen Liang","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70233","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70233","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Widespread adoption of conservation practices is increasingly encouraged to improve soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and mitigate climate change. However, soil texture and mineralogy cause variable SOC responses under conservation tillage. The role of minerals and organic carbon composition in soil aggregation and SOC stabilization remains insufficiently understood. This study evaluated the long-term effects of conservation tillage (no-tillage with straw return, NTS) versus conventional tillage (plough tillage with straw removal, CT) on carbon storage across Phaeozems, Calcaric Cambisols, and Calcic Luvisols. Compared to CT, NTS increased the annual average C sequestration rate by 15.3%–76.7% and SOC storage by 10.2%–28.4% in different soil types. NTS also increased macroaggregate percentage and mean weight diameter (MWD), resulting in 17.8%–28.3% larger macroaggregate-associated SOC and total nitrogen (TN) contents. Notably, the aromatic-C/aliphatic-C ratio under NTS increased in bulk soil and macroaggregates, which were positively correlated with larger amorphous iron (Feo) content, Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration, and specific surface area in different treatments. Phaeozems exhibit the largest SOC storage, along with larger Feo and Ca<sup>2+</sup> contents and aromatic-C/aliphatic-C ratio. However, NTS led to the greatest increases in MWD and SOC storage in Calcaric Cambisols, and the greatest enhancement of microbial biomass carbon in Calcic Luvisols. PLS-PM analysis indicated that although the aromatic-C/aliphatic ratio directly enhances aggregated stability, Feo and Ca<sup>2+</sup> promoted MWD indirectly by facilitating greater aromatic-C and polysaccharide-C. Overall, conservation tillage promoted selective binding of Feo and Ca<sup>2+</sup> to SOC functional groups, thus enhancing soil aggregation and SOC physico-chemical protection, with calcareous soils showing a stronger response.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking Soil Phosphate Chemistry: Towards a Shift in Conceptual Framework 重新思考土壤磷酸盐化学:迈向概念框架的转变
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70239
Abhijit Debnath

Classical soil phosphorus (P) chemistry is based on the belief that fertiliser P precipitates as isolated iron, aluminium and calcium compounds, an opinion encouraged by fractionation schemes and textbook dogma. However, years of evidence indicate the paradigm to be incorrect. Evidence indicates that P rather gets adsorbed onto variable-charge surfaces with subsequent penetration into particles, causing hysteresis in low-P soils and reducing fertiliser effectiveness with time. As P accumulates in soils, hysteresis decreases and fertiliser efficacy stabilises. Likewise, long-held supposition concerning the most favourable soil pH for crop growth and the role of phosphate-solubilising bacteria is found to be misleading when the direct measurement of plant uptake is interrogated. Through the exposure of such misconceptions, we contend that there is a new paradigm of soil P chemistry that more satisfactorily explains experimental observations and informs sustainable fertiliser management.

经典的土壤磷(P)化学是基于这样一种信念,即肥料P沉淀为分离的铁、铝和钙化合物,这种观点受到分选方案和教科书教条的鼓励。然而,多年的证据表明这种范式是不正确的。有证据表明,磷被吸附到可变电荷表面,随后渗透到颗粒中,在低磷土壤中造成滞后,并随着时间的推移降低肥料的有效性。随着磷在土壤中的积累,滞回效应减小,肥效趋于稳定。同样,长期以来关于最有利于作物生长的土壤pH值和溶磷细菌作用的假设,在对植物吸收的直接测量进行质疑时,被发现是误导性的。通过揭露这些误解,我们认为存在一种新的土壤磷化学范式,可以更令人满意地解释实验观察结果,并为可持续肥料管理提供信息。
{"title":"Rethinking Soil Phosphate Chemistry: Towards a Shift in Conceptual Framework","authors":"Abhijit Debnath","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70239","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70239","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Classical soil phosphorus (P) chemistry is based on the belief that fertiliser P precipitates as isolated iron, aluminium and calcium compounds, an opinion encouraged by fractionation schemes and textbook dogma. However, years of evidence indicate the paradigm to be incorrect. Evidence indicates that P rather gets adsorbed onto variable-charge surfaces with subsequent penetration into particles, causing hysteresis in low-P soils and reducing fertiliser effectiveness with time. As P accumulates in soils, hysteresis decreases and fertiliser efficacy stabilises. Likewise, long-held supposition concerning the most favourable soil pH for crop growth and the role of phosphate-solubilising bacteria is found to be misleading when the direct measurement of plant uptake is interrogated. Through the exposure of such misconceptions, we contend that there is a new paradigm of soil P chemistry that more satisfactorily explains experimental observations and informs sustainable fertiliser management.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanisms of Soil Inorganic Carbon Migration and CO2 Exchange in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions 干旱半干旱区土壤无机碳迁移和co2交换机制
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70241
Peng Shi, Xueyu Guan, Jun Xiao, Zimin Li, José A. Gómez

Soil inorganic carbon (SIC) plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions in which SIC reserves are substantial. However, the mechanisms governing SIC migration and transformation remain poorly understood. This study comprehensively reviews the influence of soil weathering, respiration, depth, precipitation, and acidity on SIC dynamics. We highlight the role of vegetation restoration in enhancing SIC storage and shifting the interactions of soil organic carbon (SOC) with SIC. The solubility changes of CO2 and carbonates, mineral surface adsorption, and soil chemical reactions are regulated by various environmental factors, substantially affecting CO2 flux. Yet the carbonate crystals left behind by evaporation during the downward migration of SIC in the soil solution can lead to soil stratification. Furthermore, vegetation restoration boosts carbon storage by adding organic matter through humus and potentially increasing SIC. Our findings reveal that SIC contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, with implications for mitigating climate change. This review provides a framework for better understanding SIC dynamics and its potential for enhancing soil carbon storage in arid ecosystems.

土壤无机碳(SIC)在全球碳循环中起着至关重要的作用,特别是在SIC储量丰富的干旱和半干旱地区。然而,控制SIC迁移和转化的机制仍然知之甚少。本文综述了土壤风化、呼吸、深度、降水和酸度对碳化硅动态的影响。我们强调了植被恢复在提高碳化硅储量和改变土壤有机碳(SOC)与碳化硅相互作用中的作用。co2与碳酸盐的溶解度变化、矿物表面吸附和土壤化学反应受各种环境因子的调控,对co2通量产生实质性影响。碳化硅在土壤溶液中向下迁移过程中蒸发留下的碳酸盐晶体会导致土壤分层。此外,植被恢复通过腐殖质增加有机质和潜在的SIC增加了碳储量。我们的研究结果表明,SIC对碳固存有显著贡献,对减缓气候变化具有重要意义。这一综述为更好地理解干旱生态系统碳化硅动态及其提高土壤碳储量的潜力提供了框架。
{"title":"Mechanisms of Soil Inorganic Carbon Migration and CO2 Exchange in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions","authors":"Peng Shi,&nbsp;Xueyu Guan,&nbsp;Jun Xiao,&nbsp;Zimin Li,&nbsp;José A. Gómez","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70241","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70241","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Soil inorganic carbon (SIC) plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions in which SIC reserves are substantial. However, the mechanisms governing SIC migration and transformation remain poorly understood. This study comprehensively reviews the influence of soil weathering, respiration, depth, precipitation, and acidity on SIC dynamics. We highlight the role of vegetation restoration in enhancing SIC storage and shifting the interactions of soil organic carbon (SOC) with SIC. The solubility changes of CO<sub>2</sub> and carbonates, mineral surface adsorption, and soil chemical reactions are regulated by various environmental factors, substantially affecting CO<sub>2</sub> flux. Yet the carbonate crystals left behind by evaporation during the downward migration of SIC in the soil solution can lead to soil stratification. Furthermore, vegetation restoration boosts carbon storage by adding organic matter through humus and potentially increasing SIC. Our findings reveal that SIC contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, with implications for mitigating climate change. This review provides a framework for better understanding SIC dynamics and its potential for enhancing soil carbon storage in arid ecosystems.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Novel Shifting Framework to Describe Bimodal Soil Hydraulic Properties 一种描述土壤双峰水力特性的新型移位框架
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70243
Yunquan Wang, Rui Ma, Ziyong Sun, Kunpeng Zhou, Gaofeng Zhu

Accurately describing bi- or multi-modal soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) is essential for understanding soil water flow processes. Traditional bimodal models, based on capillary theory, often require numerous empirical parameters and fail to adequately represent macropore flow driven by gravity and film flow held by adsorption forces. In this study, we introduce a novel framework to describe bimodal SHPs by shifting from a reference unimodal model. We propose a new bimodal soil hydraulic model based on the widely used unimodal van Genuchten–Mualem (VGM) model and incorporate the additional effects of adsorption forces. The so-called VGM-Bi model introduces two additional parameters, which can be easily derived or constrained from the measured soil water retention curve (SWRC), enhancing its usability. We further propose a modified version, the VGM-Bi-Macro model, to account for macropore effects by using a hydraulic conductivity value at a slightly negative matric potential as a new matching point. Evaluation with 25 soil samples shows that the VGM-Bi model accurately captures bimodal SWRCs but struggles with bimodal hydraulic conductivity curves (HCCs) for a few samples. In contrast, the VGM-Bi-Macro model effectively captures both. Specifically, the VGM-Bi-Macro model achieves a slightly lower mean root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.200 in estimating HCCs and nearly half the RMSE (0.008 cm3 cm−3) in estimating SWRCs compared to the VGM-Bi model (0.229 and 0.014 cm3 cm−3) and an existing bimodal model (0.262 and 0.015 cm3 cm−3), underscoring the importance of gravity-driven macropore flow. These models offer a physically meaningful and efficient tool for simulating water flow in structured soils.

准确描述双模态或多模态土壤水力特性(SHPs)对于理解土壤水流过程至关重要。传统的基于毛细理论的双峰模型往往需要大量的经验参数,不能充分表征重力驱动下的大孔流动和吸附力作用下的膜流。在这项研究中,我们引入了一个新的框架来描述双峰SHPs,从参考单峰模型转移。在广泛使用的单峰van Genuchten-Mualem (VGM)模型的基础上,我们提出了一个新的双峰土壤水力模型,并考虑了吸附力的附加效应。所谓的VGM - Bi模型引入了两个额外的参数,这些参数可以很容易地从测量的土壤保水曲线(SWRC)中导出或约束,从而增强了其可用性。我们进一步提出了一个修改版本,即VGM - Bi - Macro模型,通过使用略负的基质电位的水力电导率值作为新的匹配点来解释大孔效应。对25个土壤样品的评估表明,VGM‐Bi模型准确地捕获了双峰SWRCs,但对少数样品的双峰水力导率曲线(HCCs)存在问题。相比之下,VGM - Bi - Macro模型有效地捕获了两者。具体来说,与VGM - Bi模型(0.229和0.014 cm 3 cm - 3)和现有的双峰模型(0.262和0.015 cm 3 cm - 3)相比,VGM - Bi - Macro模型在估计HCCs方面的平均均方根误差(RMSE)略低,为0.200,在估计SWRCs方面的RMSE (0.008 cm 3 cm - 3)接近一半,强调了重力驱动的大孔隙流动的重要性。这些模型为模拟结构性土壤中的水流提供了物理上有意义和有效的工具。
{"title":"A Novel Shifting Framework to Describe Bimodal Soil Hydraulic Properties","authors":"Yunquan Wang,&nbsp;Rui Ma,&nbsp;Ziyong Sun,&nbsp;Kunpeng Zhou,&nbsp;Gaofeng Zhu","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70243","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70243","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Accurately describing bi- or multi-modal soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) is essential for understanding soil water flow processes. Traditional bimodal models, based on capillary theory, often require numerous empirical parameters and fail to adequately represent macropore flow driven by gravity and film flow held by adsorption forces. In this study, we introduce a novel framework to describe bimodal SHPs by shifting from a reference unimodal model. We propose a new bimodal soil hydraulic model based on the widely used unimodal van Genuchten–Mualem (VGM) model and incorporate the additional effects of adsorption forces. The so-called VGM-Bi model introduces two additional parameters, which can be easily derived or constrained from the measured soil water retention curve (SWRC), enhancing its usability. We further propose a modified version, the VGM-Bi-Macro model, to account for macropore effects by using a hydraulic conductivity value at a slightly negative matric potential as a new matching point. Evaluation with 25 soil samples shows that the VGM-Bi model accurately captures bimodal SWRCs but struggles with bimodal hydraulic conductivity curves (HCCs) for a few samples. In contrast, the VGM-Bi-Macro model effectively captures both. Specifically, the VGM-Bi-Macro model achieves a slightly lower mean root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.200 in estimating HCCs and nearly half the RMSE (0.008 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>) in estimating SWRCs compared to the VGM-Bi model (0.229 and 0.014 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>) and an existing bimodal model (0.262 and 0.015 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>), underscoring the importance of gravity-driven macropore flow. These models offer a physically meaningful and efficient tool for simulating water flow in structured soils.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145545469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatial Prediction of Soil Microbial Enzyme Activities Using On-The-Go Vis–NIR Spectroscopy 利用On - Go - Vis - NIR光谱对土壤微生物酶活性的空间预测
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70225
Muhammad Qaswar, Eiko E. Kuramae, Abdul Mounem Mouazen

Despite being key indicators of soil fertility and quality, microbial enzyme activities are rarely assessed spatially due to the high number of samples required and labour-intensive assays. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of on-the-go visible–near infrared (vis–NIR) spectroscopy to predict and map the spatial distribution of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and arylsulphatase (ARS) activities. An on-the-go (tractor-pulled sensor platform) vis–NIR spectroscopy sensor, coupled with partial least squares regression (PLSR), was used to estimate microbial enzyme activities in two fields, namely, Cayenne and Mortier, Belgium. Spatial maps were developed for both measured and predicted enzyme activities and analyzed using Local Moran's I and Bivariate Moran's I spatial statistics. Results showed strong correlations between total organic carbon (TOC), pH, and enzyme activities for samples from these two sites. A notable negative correlation existed between soil pH and TOC. PLSR model prediction accuracy varied by enzyme, with the highest for ARS (R2 = 0.70, ratio of performance to interquartile distance [RPIQ] = 2.79), followed by BG (R2 = 0.69, RPIQ = 2.93), ACP (R2 = 0.64, RPIQ = 2.95), and ALP (R2 = 0.60, RPIQ = 1.81). Spatial analysis demonstrated a strong agreement between measured and predicted enzyme activity maps, except for ARS in the Mortier field. Bivariate Moran's Iindicated positive spatial correlations between observed and predicted enzyme activities. In the Cayenne field, the highest Bivariate Moran's I was 0.64 for ACP, while in the Mortier field, the highest value was 0.58 for ALP. Overall, PLSR models performed better in the Cayenne field; hence, spatial predictions of enzyme activities were generally reliable, except for ARS in the Mortier field. These findings demonstrate that on-the-go line vis–NIR spectroscopy can provide reliable, high-resolution maps of soil microbial activities, offering a practical tool for guiding precision fertilizer recommendations.

尽管微生物酶活性是土壤肥力和质量的关键指标,但由于需要大量样品和劳动密集型分析,很少在空间上评估微生物酶活性。本研究旨在评估可见光-近红外光谱(vis-NIR)在预测和绘制β - 1,4 -葡萄糖苷酶(BG)、酸性磷酸酶(ACP)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和芳基硫酸酶(ARS)活性的空间分布方面的潜力。利用拖拉机式传感器平台(on - go)的可见光-近红外光谱传感器,结合偏最小二乘回归(PLSR),对比利时卡宴和莫蒂埃两个地区的微生物酶活性进行了估计。开发了测量和预测酶活性的空间图,并使用Local Moran's I和Bivariate Moran's I空间统计进行分析。结果表明,这两个地点样品的总有机碳(TOC)、pH和酶活性之间存在很强的相关性。土壤pH值与TOC呈显著负相关。PLSR模型的预测精度因酶而异,ARS的预测精度最高(r2 = 0.70,性能与四分位间距之比[RPIQ] = 2.79),其次是BG (r2 = 0.69, RPIQ = 2.93)、ACP (r2 = 0.64, RPIQ = 2.95)和ALP (r2 = 0.60, RPIQ = 1.81)。空间分析表明,除了Mortier田间的ARS外,测量的酶活性图与预测的酶活性图之间存在很强的一致性。双变量Moran’s I表明,观察到的酶活性与预测的酶活性呈正相关。卡宴田ACP的双变量Moran’s I最高为0.64,莫蒂埃田ALP的双变量Moran’s I最高为0.58。总体而言,PLSR模型在卡宴油田表现较好;因此,酶活性的空间预测总体上是可靠的,除了在Mortier田的ARS。这些发现表明,在线可见-近红外光谱可以提供可靠的、高分辨率的土壤微生物活动图,为指导精确施肥提供了实用的工具。
{"title":"Spatial Prediction of Soil Microbial Enzyme Activities Using On-The-Go Vis–NIR Spectroscopy","authors":"Muhammad Qaswar,&nbsp;Eiko E. Kuramae,&nbsp;Abdul Mounem Mouazen","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70225","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70225","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite being key indicators of soil fertility and quality, microbial enzyme activities are rarely assessed spatially due to the high number of samples required and labour-intensive assays. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of on-the-go visible–near infrared (vis–NIR) spectroscopy to predict and map the spatial distribution of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and arylsulphatase (ARS) activities. An on-the-go (tractor-pulled sensor platform) vis–NIR spectroscopy sensor, coupled with partial least squares regression (PLSR), was used to estimate microbial enzyme activities in two fields, namely, Cayenne and Mortier, Belgium. Spatial maps were developed for both measured and predicted enzyme activities and analyzed using Local Moran's <i>I</i> and Bivariate Moran's <i>I</i> spatial statistics. Results showed strong correlations between total organic carbon (TOC), pH, and enzyme activities for samples from these two sites. A notable negative correlation existed between soil pH and TOC. PLSR model prediction accuracy varied by enzyme, with the highest for ARS (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.70, ratio of performance to interquartile distance [RPIQ] = 2.79), followed by BG (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.69, RPIQ = 2.93), ACP (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.64, RPIQ = 2.95), and ALP (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.60, RPIQ = 1.81). Spatial analysis demonstrated a strong agreement between measured and predicted enzyme activity maps, except for ARS in the Mortier field. Bivariate Moran's <i>I</i>indicated positive spatial correlations between observed and predicted enzyme activities. In the Cayenne field, the highest Bivariate Moran's <i>I</i> was 0.64 for ACP, while in the Mortier field, the highest value was 0.58 for ALP. Overall, PLSR models performed better in the Cayenne field; hence, spatial predictions of enzyme activities were generally reliable, except for ARS in the Mortier field. These findings demonstrate that on-the-go line vis–NIR spectroscopy can provide reliable, high-resolution maps of soil microbial activities, offering a practical tool for guiding precision fertilizer recommendations.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145535815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Engaging in Transdisciplinary Soil Research: A Roadmap for Soil Scientists 从事跨学科土壤研究:土壤科学家的路线图
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70231
Julie Gillespie, Jo-Anne Cavanagh, Sarah Edwards, Dyanna Jolly, Dione Payne, Carol Smith

To address complex challenges and help advance a systems theory for soils requires soil scientists to be able to engage with knowledges outside the discipline of soil science. However, there is a lack of examples and guidance available to support different ways of producing new knowledge. Drawing on our experience as a transdisciplinary team, we present a roadmap comprising five key steps for undertaking transdisciplinary, soil-centred research. The five steps are: addressing complex challenges, building relationships, weaving knowledges and building connectivity, developing holistic understandings and moving beyond knowledge translation. The central tenet of the roadmap is connectivity, with soil health at the core of the interrelationships of people, soil and food. To illustrate the application of this roadmap, we share learnings from two case studies that focused on understanding connections between people and soil, through food production in an Aotearoa New Zealand context. These case studies weave together mātauraka Māori (Māori Indigenous knowledge) and soil science, guided by social science framings, providing examples of how to undertake Transdisciplinary Research (TDR) and guidance for others looking to extend the boundaries of our field by connecting and applying new approaches to knowledge creation, and in so doing advance the development of a soil systems approach.

为了解决复杂的挑战并帮助推进土壤系统理论,土壤科学家需要能够接触土壤科学学科之外的知识。然而,缺乏可用的例子和指导来支持产生新知识的不同方式。根据我们作为一个跨学科团队的经验,我们提出了一个路线图,其中包括五个关键步骤,以开展跨学科、土壤为中心的研究。这五个步骤是:应对复杂挑战、建立关系、编织知识和建立连通性、发展整体理解和超越知识翻译。路线图的核心原则是连通性,土壤健康是人、土壤和粮食相互关系的核心。为了说明该路线图的应用,我们分享了两个案例研究的经验教训,这两个案例研究的重点是通过新西兰奥特罗阿的粮食生产了解人与土壤之间的联系。这些案例研究结合了mātauraka Māori (Māori土著知识)和土壤科学,在社会科学框架的指导下,提供了如何进行跨学科研究(TDR)的例子,并为其他希望通过连接和应用知识创造的新方法来扩展我们领域边界的人提供了指导,从而推动了土壤系统方法的发展。
{"title":"Engaging in Transdisciplinary Soil Research: A Roadmap for Soil Scientists","authors":"Julie Gillespie,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Cavanagh,&nbsp;Sarah Edwards,&nbsp;Dyanna Jolly,&nbsp;Dione Payne,&nbsp;Carol Smith","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70231","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70231","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To address complex challenges and help advance a systems theory for soils requires soil scientists to be able to engage with knowledges outside the discipline of soil science. However, there is a lack of examples and guidance available to support different ways of producing new knowledge. Drawing on our experience as a transdisciplinary team, we present a roadmap comprising five key steps for undertaking transdisciplinary, soil-centred research. The five steps are: addressing complex challenges, building relationships, weaving knowledges and building connectivity, developing holistic understandings and moving beyond knowledge translation. The central tenet of the roadmap is connectivity, with soil health at the core of the interrelationships of people, soil and food. To illustrate the application of this roadmap, we share learnings from two case studies that focused on understanding connections between people and soil, through food production in an Aotearoa New Zealand context. These case studies weave together mātauraka Māori (Māori Indigenous knowledge) and soil science, guided by social science framings, providing examples of how to undertake Transdisciplinary Research (TDR) and guidance for others looking to extend the boundaries of our field by connecting and applying new approaches to knowledge creation, and in so doing advance the development of a soil systems approach.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145531636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accelerated Incubation Method for Identification of Boreal Soils With Hypersulfidic Material 高硫物质鉴定北方土壤的加速培养法
IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70236
Miriam I. Nystrand, Mirkka Visuri, Anton Boman, Jaakko Auri, Peter Österholm

Sulfide-bearing sediments (i.e., soils with hypersulfidic material) occur worldwide in many coastal and inland freshwater settings, that if exposed to oxidation, will transform to acid sulfate soils (ASS; a soil with sulfuric material) mobilizing acidity and metals into watercourses with serious environmental consequences and damage to infrastructures. Thus, management techniques to minimize these hazards are important but rely on correct identification of hypersulfidic material. The incubation pH method is one of the most reliable, easy-to-use, and low-cost methods for this purpose. The method simulates the natural oxidation behavior of possible existing hypersulfidic material by exposing the soil to the atmosphere at room temperature while maintaining it moist over a period of time (often between 8 and 19 weeks) for acid-generating oxidation reactions to take place. The soil material is considered hypersulfidic if the amount of acidity produced during oxidation exceeds its acid-neutralizing capacity and thereby lowers the mineral soil pH to < 4 (ΔpH > 0.5) and the organic-rich soil (LOI > 20%) to < 3 (ΔpH > 0.5). For practical reasons, an incubation time of up to 19 weeks is, however, in many cases too long and the main goal in this study was to reduce the required incubation time by optimizing oxidation/acidification conditions with the intention to recommend an accelerated incubation method. To ensure the method's usability, several trial experiments were conducted on various types of soil materials containing sulfidic materials, including peat, sandy/loamy soils, and heavy clays. The trial included testing different temperature ranges, optimizing the sample thickness, determining the effects of stirring versus non-stirring the samples during incubation, and using “quick start” doping agents. The incubation time needed was reduced up to 50% by optimizing the sample thickness from 5 to 2 mm according to the most recent recommendations and, most importantly, by applying heat to 30°C. In mineral soil samples, the incubation time was additionally reduced by stirring the samples. Mineral soils with hypersulfidic material could generally be identified in less than 2 weeks and organic soils with hypersulfidic material in around 4 weeks. Heavy clay soils needed, however, 5 weeks to be identified as hypersulfidic material. Consequently, the best set of recommended incubation methods, based on numerous trial experiments and conditions conducted, for faster identification of different textured soils with hypersulfidic material is as follows: (I) Mineral soils: use a 2 mm thick sample in chip trays; applying heat to 30°C; stirring the samples three times per week. (II) Mineral soils with heavy clay textures: use a 2 mm thick sample (or thinner) in chip trays; applying heat to 30°C; stirring the samples three times per week. (III) Peat/organic soils: use a 2 mm thick sample in chip trays; applying heat to 30°C.

含硫沉积物(即含高硫物质的土壤)在世界各地的许多沿海和内陆淡水环境中都存在,如果暴露于氧化,将转变为酸性硫酸盐土壤(ASS;含硫物质的土壤),将酸度和金属转移到水道中,造成严重的环境后果和对基础设施的破坏。因此,减少这些危害的管理技术很重要,但依赖于对高硫化物物质的正确识别。孵育pH法是最可靠、易于使用和低成本的方法之一。该方法模拟了可能存在的高硫化物物质的自然氧化行为,将土壤暴露在室温下的大气中,同时在一段时间内(通常在8到19周之间)保持湿润,以便发生酸生成氧化反应。如果氧化过程中产生的酸度超过其酸中和能力,从而使矿质土壤的pH值降至<; 4 (ΔpH > 0.5),有机富土(LOI > 20%)降至<; 3 (ΔpH > 0.5),则认为土壤材料是高硫化的。然而,由于实际原因,在许多情况下,长达19周的孵育时间太长,本研究的主要目标是通过优化氧化/酸化条件来减少所需的孵育时间,并推荐一种加速孵育方法。为了保证该方法的可用性,我们在泥炭、砂质/壤土、重粘土等含硫化物的不同类型的土壤材料上进行了多次试验。试验包括测试不同的温度范围,优化样品厚度,确定在孵育过程中搅拌与不搅拌对样品的影响,以及使用“快速启动”掺杂剂。根据最新的建议,通过优化样品厚度从5到2毫米,最重要的是,通过加热到30°C,所需的孵育时间减少了50%。在矿质土壤样品中,通过搅拌样品可以进一步缩短孵育时间。含高硫化物的矿质土壤一般在2周内就能被识别出来,含高硫化物的有机土壤一般在4周左右就能被识别出来。然而,重黏土需要5周才能被确定为高硫物质。因此,在进行了大量试验和条件的基础上,为了更快地识别含有高硫化物物质的不同质地土壤,推荐的最佳培养方法如下:(I)矿物土壤:在薄片托盘中使用2mm厚的样品;加热至30°C;每周搅拌样品三次。(II)有重粘土质地的矿质土壤:用2毫米厚(或更薄)的样品放在薄片托盘中;加热至30°C;每周搅拌样品三次。(三)泥炭/有机土壤:用2mm厚的样品放在薄片托盘中;加热至30°C。
{"title":"Accelerated Incubation Method for Identification of Boreal Soils With Hypersulfidic Material","authors":"Miriam I. Nystrand,&nbsp;Mirkka Visuri,&nbsp;Anton Boman,&nbsp;Jaakko Auri,&nbsp;Peter Österholm","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70236","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70236","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sulfide-bearing sediments (i.e., soils with hypersulfidic material) occur worldwide in many coastal and inland freshwater settings, that if exposed to oxidation, will transform to acid sulfate soils (ASS; a soil with sulfuric material) mobilizing acidity and metals into watercourses with serious environmental consequences and damage to infrastructures. Thus, management techniques to minimize these hazards are important but rely on correct identification of hypersulfidic material. The incubation pH method is one of the most reliable, easy-to-use, and low-cost methods for this purpose. The method simulates the natural oxidation behavior of possible existing hypersulfidic material by exposing the soil to the atmosphere at room temperature while maintaining it moist over a period of time (often between 8 and 19 weeks) for acid-generating oxidation reactions to take place. The soil material is considered hypersulfidic if the amount of acidity produced during oxidation exceeds its acid-neutralizing capacity and thereby lowers the mineral soil pH to &lt; 4 (ΔpH &gt; 0.5) and the organic-rich soil (LOI &gt; 20%) to &lt; 3 (ΔpH &gt; 0.5). For practical reasons, an incubation time of up to 19 weeks is, however, in many cases too long and the main goal in this study was to reduce the required incubation time by optimizing oxidation/acidification conditions with the intention to recommend an accelerated incubation method. To ensure the method's usability, several trial experiments were conducted on various types of soil materials containing sulfidic materials, including peat, sandy/loamy soils, and heavy clays. The trial included testing different temperature ranges, optimizing the sample thickness, determining the effects of stirring versus non-stirring the samples during incubation, and using “quick start” doping agents. The incubation time needed was reduced up to 50% by optimizing the sample thickness from 5 to 2 mm according to the most recent recommendations and, most importantly, by applying heat to 30°C. In mineral soil samples, the incubation time was additionally reduced by stirring the samples. Mineral soils with hypersulfidic material could generally be identified in less than 2 weeks and organic soils with hypersulfidic material in around 4 weeks. Heavy clay soils needed, however, 5 weeks to be identified as hypersulfidic material. Consequently, the best set of recommended incubation methods, based on numerous trial experiments and conditions conducted, for faster identification of different textured soils with hypersulfidic material is as follows: (I) Mineral soils: use a 2 mm thick sample in chip trays; applying heat to 30°C; stirring the samples three times per week. (II) Mineral soils with heavy clay textures: use a 2 mm thick sample (or thinner) in chip trays; applying heat to 30°C; stirring the samples three times per week. (III) Peat/organic soils: use a 2 mm thick sample in chip trays; applying heat to 30°C.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70236","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145532047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1