Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Katharina Meurer, Klaus Jarosch, Rajasekaran Murugan, Lars Munkholm, Claire Chenu, Christopher Poeplau
<p>EJP SOIL (2020–2025) was a European Joint Programme on Agricultural Soil Management, launched to address key societal challenges such as climate change and future food security. The programme aimed to enhance the understanding of agricultural soil management by creating synergies in research, strengthening research communities, and raising public awareness (https://ejpsoil.eu/).</p><p>While the first Special Issue of EJP SOIL, “Climate-smart sustainable agricultural soil management for the future I”, focused primarily on early-stage work—comprising 10 surveys, 8 reviews, and 4 research articles—this second Special Issue presents a deeper dive into experimental findings. It highlights predominantly research articles (18), complemented by topic-specific reviews (2) and surveys (2), as well as short communications (2) and one methods article, drawing on results from ongoing projects. The contributions are structured around five core themes that form the backbone of EJP SOIL.</p><p>The first and perhaps most comprehensive theme is Sustainable Land Management, which encompasses the evaluation of management options, mitigation of soil threats, and the status and role of soil biodiversity (Figure 1; reproduced from Towards climate-smart sustainable management of agricultural soil, 2025 by Laroche et al., licensed under CC BY 4.0).</p><p>The second theme, Climate Change Mitigation, has received increasing attention in the context of the EU's Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF), particularly regarding carbon farming. This includes studies on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration processes and potentials, the development of robust Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) methodologies, and assessments of trade-offs among SOC, nitrogen, and phosphorus.</p><p>The third theme, Climate Change Adaptation, addresses the growing need for resilient farming systems. Here, scientific evaluations of management options support farmers in responding to extreme weather events and shifting climatic conditions.</p><p>The fourth theme, Soil Information Assessing and Monitoring, has gained political relevance since the adoption of the EU Soil Monitoring Law in November 2025. Together with the establishment of the European Soil Observatory (EUSO) and the upcoming launch of new ESA satellites in 2028, this area is advancing rapidly. Key aspects include the development of soil health frameworks and indicators, innovative data acquisition methods, and harmonized soil information systems across Europe.</p><p>Finally, the fifth theme, Fostering Adoption, focuses on bridging science and practice. It includes the evaluation of support tools, stakeholder engagement strategies, policy and incentive analyses, and the promotion of capacity building and education.</p><p>The overarching aim of the EJP SOIL program—and of this Special Issue in collaboration with the European Journal of Soil Science—is to support climate change adaptation and mitigation through improved soi
EJP SOIL(2020-2025)是欧洲农业土壤管理联合计划,旨在应对气候变化和未来粮食安全等关键社会挑战。该方案旨在通过在研究中创造协同效应、加强研究界和提高公众认识来提高对农业土壤管理的了解(https://ejpsoil.eu/)。EJP SOIL的第一期特刊“未来气候智慧型可持续农业土壤管理I”主要关注早期工作——包括10项调查、8篇综述和4篇研究文章——而第二期特刊则对实验结果进行了更深入的探讨。它主要突出了研究文章(18),辅以特定主题的评论(2)和调查(2),以及简短的交流(2)和一篇方法文章,借鉴了正在进行的项目的结果。这些贡献是围绕构成EJP SOIL主干的五个核心主题构建的。第一个也许是最全面的主题是可持续土地管理,其中包括对管理方案的评估、土壤威胁的缓解以及土壤生物多样性的地位和作用(图1;摘自Laroche等人的《迈向气候智能型农业土壤可持续管理》,2025年,根据CC by 4.0授权)。第二个主题“减缓气候变化”在欧盟碳去除认证框架(CRCF)的背景下受到越来越多的关注,特别是在碳农业方面。这包括对土壤有机碳(SOC)固存过程和潜力的研究,强大的监测、报告、验证(MRV)方法的发展,以及SOC、氮和磷之间权衡的评估。第三个主题是“适应气候变化”,旨在解决对抗灾农业系统日益增长的需求。在这里,对管理方案的科学评估支持农民应对极端天气事件和不断变化的气候条件。第四个主题是土壤信息评估和监测,自2025年11月通过《欧盟土壤监测法》以来,该主题已获得政治意义。随着欧洲土壤观测站(EUSO)的建立和即将在2028年发射的ESA新卫星,这一领域正在迅速发展。关键方面包括制定土壤健康框架和指标、创新的数据获取方法以及整个欧洲统一的土壤信息系统。最后,第五个主题“促进收养”侧重于连接科学和实践。它包括对支持工具的评估、利益相关者参与战略、政策和激励分析,以及促进能力建设和教育。EJP土壤方案以及本期特刊与《欧洲土壤科学杂志》合作的总体目标是,通过改善土壤管理,支持适应和减缓气候变化。在这样做的过程中,它有助于整个欧洲的粮食安全、增强生态系统服务和加强土壤教育。本期特刊的25篇文章为我们提供了有关该计划核心主题的宝贵见解。它们共同为今后更好地管理土壤奠定了基础。在过去的几年里,土壤不仅在质量恶化和日益退化方面得到了越来越多的认可,而且还被视为实现欧洲政治倡议(如欧洲绿色协议或共同农业政策)雄心勃勃的目标的潜在解决方案的一部分(Keesstra et al. 2024)。除了努力使欧洲农业更具可持续性之外,迫切需要重新思考哪些管理实践认为有意义,例如,与追求更高效(通常也更集约化)农业相关的环境压力。例如,人们经常建议采取更可持续的管理办法,从传统耕作改为少耕或免耕,以及种植覆盖作物,以确保土壤覆盖,减少硝酸盐淋失和侵蚀。耕作的主要原因是作物残茬和杂草的掺入以及土壤的松动、混合和通风。虽然这肯定会影响生物(Ocvirk et al. 2025; Spiegel et al. 2025)、化学(Spiegel et al. 2025)和物理(ten Damme et al. 2025)土壤特性,但报道的耕作处理之间的差异通常仅限于表土(0-10厘米),而在更深的土层(例如Spiegel et al. 2025; ten Damme et al. 2025)中几乎没有发现显著差异。然而,经常被忽视的是土壤和天气条件的异质性,这很难通过单一的实验研究来捕捉。ten Damme等人的研究。 (2025)利用EJP SOIL联盟的广泛传播,包括沿欧洲土壤-气候梯度考虑不同耕作处理的7个长期田间试验(lte)。研究人员发现,7种ltte之间土壤结构参数的差异往往大于不同耕作方式之间的差异。然而,在免耕条件下,更高的密实度和可能更长时间的缺氧条件有望增加反硝化的机会,从而增加一氧化二氮(N2O)的排放。这一假设得到了Ocvirk等人(2025)的研究的支持,他们发现,与传统耕作相比,经过20年的非反转耕作,表土中所有土壤团聚体粒径组分的团聚体稳定性更高,有机碳含量也更高。这意味着可能促进反硝化的条件,从而促进N2O的排放。然而,无论耕作与否,土壤结构都会受到任何干预措施的显著影响。这使得建模研究相当困难,特别是如果模型不考虑土壤结构的变化,从而通过管理实践考虑土壤水力特性。Turek等人(2025)对此进行了更深入的研究,他们建立了四种农业水文模型,其中包含18种不同的土壤水力描述,这些描述来自土壤传递函数(ptf)。作者发现,模型输出的方差受到模型的强烈影响,而受PTF的影响较小。此外,模型对PTF选择的敏感性取决于模型所使用的水文方法的类型。因此,作者建议使用ptf的集合,从而得到一系列土壤水力特性,这将有助于覆盖区域土壤异质性。覆盖作物在两种主要作物之间播种,以减少主要作物的裸露土壤或下播期,以增加田间物种丰富度(Oberholzer et al. 2024)。存在不同的策略,即覆盖种植系统,而“永久土壤覆盖”意味着覆盖作物的生物量被收获但不纳入土壤,“双重覆盖”意味着夏季覆盖作物被纳入土壤而终止,随后是冬季覆盖作物。Oberholzer等人(2024)假设不同的覆盖种植策略对土壤有机质动态有不同的影响,他们对瑞士东部的六个农田进行了为期9个月的研究。作者观察到不同时间和不同领域之间的高度可变性,而不是不同策略之间的差异。然而,基于他们的结果,作者证实了早期的研究,即在永久土壤覆盖下,更高的地下碳输入似乎比双重覆盖种植所提供的地上生物量输入对有机碳储量的积累更重要。在丘陵地区和种植系统(如葡萄园)中,使用覆盖作物作为防止侵蚀的措施尤其广为人知。然而,葡萄产区通常是水资源有限的,由于与主要作物争夺水资源,在葡萄行之间建立永久的土壤覆盖是有问题的。葡萄园通常位于相当陡峭的斜坡上,这是有机碳含量较低的浅层土壤的原因之一(例如,Garcia等人,2018),这使得行间管理对于改善土壤质量的潜在效益更加重要。Liebhard等人(2024)利用四个欧洲国家的78个葡萄园表明,“低强度管理”,即低耕作强度和覆盖作物,与更密集的行间管理相比,在长期内显示出有机碳和土壤物理性质的增加。唯一的例外是在高度缺水地区的葡萄园,在那里建立临时覆盖作物并没有提高土壤质量。作者建议,交替的低强度行间管理而不是高强度耕作来控制杂草,可能是永久土壤覆盖的可行替代方案,这在缺水地区可能特别好。总的来说,本期特刊的研究结果清楚地表明,在可持续土壤管理方面,没有什么灵丹妙药,但必须考虑土壤气候条件,更不用说地区和农场之间的社会、文化和经济差异。增加有机碳储量是促进减缓气候变化的最突出选择之一,本期特刊的几项研究有助于增进对这方面的了解。例如,正如Keel等人(2025)利用数值模拟预测的那样,外源有机物的预处理——如堆肥或热解——实质上影响了土壤的长期碳储量。 同样,作物轮作选择也强烈影响有机碳随时间的增加或减少。具体而言,通过比较欧洲30个田间试验的数据,Panagea等人(2025)发现,轮作中增加草料豆科植物的比例可使有机碳收益高达0.44 Mg ha - 1年−1年−1,而籽粒豆科植物轮作导致的有机碳损失为-
{"title":"Editorial for the Second EJP SOIL Special Issue: “Climate-Smart Sustainable Agricultural Soil Management for the Future II”","authors":"Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Katharina Meurer, Klaus Jarosch, Rajasekaran Murugan, Lars Munkholm, Claire Chenu, Christopher Poeplau","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70274","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70274","url":null,"abstract":"<p>EJP SOIL (2020–2025) was a European Joint Programme on Agricultural Soil Management, launched to address key societal challenges such as climate change and future food security. The programme aimed to enhance the understanding of agricultural soil management by creating synergies in research, strengthening research communities, and raising public awareness (https://ejpsoil.eu/).</p><p>While the first Special Issue of EJP SOIL, “Climate-smart sustainable agricultural soil management for the future I”, focused primarily on early-stage work—comprising 10 surveys, 8 reviews, and 4 research articles—this second Special Issue presents a deeper dive into experimental findings. It highlights predominantly research articles (18), complemented by topic-specific reviews (2) and surveys (2), as well as short communications (2) and one methods article, drawing on results from ongoing projects. The contributions are structured around five core themes that form the backbone of EJP SOIL.</p><p>The first and perhaps most comprehensive theme is Sustainable Land Management, which encompasses the evaluation of management options, mitigation of soil threats, and the status and role of soil biodiversity (Figure 1; reproduced from Towards climate-smart sustainable management of agricultural soil, 2025 by Laroche et al., licensed under CC BY 4.0).</p><p>The second theme, Climate Change Mitigation, has received increasing attention in the context of the EU's Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF), particularly regarding carbon farming. This includes studies on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration processes and potentials, the development of robust Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) methodologies, and assessments of trade-offs among SOC, nitrogen, and phosphorus.</p><p>The third theme, Climate Change Adaptation, addresses the growing need for resilient farming systems. Here, scientific evaluations of management options support farmers in responding to extreme weather events and shifting climatic conditions.</p><p>The fourth theme, Soil Information Assessing and Monitoring, has gained political relevance since the adoption of the EU Soil Monitoring Law in November 2025. Together with the establishment of the European Soil Observatory (EUSO) and the upcoming launch of new ESA satellites in 2028, this area is advancing rapidly. Key aspects include the development of soil health frameworks and indicators, innovative data acquisition methods, and harmonized soil information systems across Europe.</p><p>Finally, the fifth theme, Fostering Adoption, focuses on bridging science and practice. It includes the evaluation of support tools, stakeholder engagement strategies, policy and incentive analyses, and the promotion of capacity building and education.</p><p>The overarching aim of the EJP SOIL program—and of this Special Issue in collaboration with the European Journal of Soil Science—is to support climate change adaptation and mitigation through improved soi","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70274","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}