首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Soil Science最新文献

英文 中文
Effect of salt concentration on osmotic potential in drying soils—Measurement and models 盐浓度对干燥土壤渗透势的影响--测量与模型
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.70001
Jannis Bosse, Wolfgang Durner, Andre Peters

The water potential in drying soils, comprising both matric potential and osmotic potential components, can be measured using the dew point method (DPM). By combining DPM data with retention curve data acquired from techniques such as the suction plate method or the simplified evaporation method (SEM), it becomes possible to determine the soil water retention curve across the entire moisture spectrum. However, as the latter methods only determine the matric potential, the osmotic potential component in DPM data must either be negligible or known so that osmotic and matric potential components can be separated. This study aims to critically analyse common approaches for calculating the osmotic potential. To achieve this, we measured the water retention properties of a silt loam, a sandy loam and a sand across the entire moisture range by combining SEM and DPM. By using almost salt-free soil material, we characterized reference water retention curves with negligible osmotic potential components. The impact of salt on water potential was analysed by conditioning soils with MgCl2 solutions of different concentrations, drying them, and measuring the water potential at different water contents using the DPM. The resulting water potentials were compared to the reference potentials and differences were interpreted as the osmotic potential component. The DPM-measured water potentials in drying soils can be significantly affected by osmotic potential, especially at higher matric potentials (low suctions). Two models accounting for ideal and one model accounting for non-ideal electrolyte behaviour were used to compare osmotic potential predictions with measurements. At low to medium salt concentrations, all models performed fairly well. At high concentrations, only the model accounting for non-ideal behaviour predicted the osmotic potential satisfactorily, whereas at very high concentrations, all models underestimated the impact of osmotic potential on water potential. This suggests that the surface properties of the soil matrix, such as the specific surface area and surface charges, may lead to a decrease in osmotic potential beyond what is expected in pure solutions.

干燥土壤中的水势包括母势和渗透势两个部分,可以使用露点法(DPM)进行测量。通过将露点法数据与吸水板法或简化蒸发法 (SEM) 等技术获得的保水曲线数据相结合,可以确定整个湿度范围内的土壤保水曲线。不过,由于后一种方法只能确定母质势,因此 DPM 数据中的渗透势成分必须可以忽略不计或已知,这样才能将渗透势和母质势成分分开。本研究旨在对计算渗透势的常用方法进行批判性分析。为此,我们结合扫描电镜和 DPM 测量了淤泥质壤土、砂质壤土和砂土在整个湿度范围内的保水特性。通过使用几乎不含盐的土壤材料,我们确定了渗透势成分可忽略不计的参考保水曲线。通过用不同浓度的氯化镁溶液调节土壤、干燥土壤并使用 DPM 测量不同含水量下的水势,分析了盐对水势的影响。将得到的水势与参考水势进行比较,并将差异解释为渗透势成分。DPM 测量的干燥土壤中的水势会受到渗透势的显著影响,尤其是在较高的母势(低吸力)下。我们使用了两个理想电解质行为模型和一个非理想电解质行为模型来比较渗透电位预测值和测量值。在中低盐浓度下,所有模型的表现都相当不错。在高浓度时,只有考虑非理想行为的模型对渗透电位的预测令人满意,而在极高浓度时,所有模型都低估了渗透电位对水势的影响。这表明,土壤基质的表面特性,如比表面积和表面电荷,可能会导致渗透势的降低,超出纯溶液的预期。
{"title":"Effect of salt concentration on osmotic potential in drying soils—Measurement and models","authors":"Jannis Bosse,&nbsp;Wolfgang Durner,&nbsp;Andre Peters","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70001","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The water potential in drying soils, comprising both matric potential and osmotic potential components, can be measured using the dew point method (DPM). By combining DPM data with retention curve data acquired from techniques such as the suction plate method or the simplified evaporation method (SEM), it becomes possible to determine the soil water retention curve across the entire moisture spectrum. However, as the latter methods only determine the matric potential, the osmotic potential component in DPM data must either be negligible or known so that osmotic and matric potential components can be separated. This study aims to critically analyse common approaches for calculating the osmotic potential. To achieve this, we measured the water retention properties of a silt loam, a sandy loam and a sand across the entire moisture range by combining SEM and DPM. By using almost salt-free soil material, we characterized reference water retention curves with negligible osmotic potential components. The impact of salt on water potential was analysed by conditioning soils with MgCl<sub>2</sub> solutions of different concentrations, drying them, and measuring the water potential at different water contents using the DPM. The resulting water potentials were compared to the reference potentials and differences were interpreted as the osmotic potential component. The DPM-measured water potentials in drying soils can be significantly affected by osmotic potential, especially at higher matric potentials (low suctions). Two models accounting for ideal and one model accounting for non-ideal electrolyte behaviour were used to compare osmotic potential predictions with measurements. At low to medium salt concentrations, all models performed fairly well. At high concentrations, only the model accounting for non-ideal behaviour predicted the osmotic potential satisfactorily, whereas at very high concentrations, all models underestimated the impact of osmotic potential on water potential. This suggests that the surface properties of the soil matrix, such as the specific surface area and surface charges, may lead to a decrease in osmotic potential beyond what is expected in pure solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142488750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spruce and pine utilization of phosphorus in soil amended with 33P-labelled hydroxylapatite 云杉和松树利用用 33P 标记的羟基磷灰石改良的土壤中的磷
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13587
Louise Rütting, Diana Hofmann, Thomas Pütz, Matthias Konrad-Schmolke, Roland Bol

Mined rock phosphate is expected to become a scarce resource within the next few decades as global phosphorus (P) deposits are declining. As a result, mineral P fertilizer will be less available and more expensive. Therefore, improved knowledge is needed on other P resources, for example, apatite fertilizers derived from the by-products of iron mining. Forestry is a potential future consumer of apatite-rich products with the aim of obtaining more wood per hectare. The actual P availability in apatite to plants has so far been barely quantified. We therefore examined tree P uptake using 33P apatite under chamber-grown and outdoor conditions. We examined the P uptake for the two main conifer species spruce (Picea abies) and pine (Pinus sylvestris) used in Fenno-Scandinavian forestry. We synthesized 33P-enriched apatite and applied it to mesocosms with growing seedlings of spruce and pine. The P uptake from 33P-labelled hydroxylapatite was subsequently traced by (bio)imaging of radioactivity in the plants and by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) upon destructive harvest in all plant fractions (leaves, stem and roots) and rhizosphere soil. Two climatic conditions were compared, one at natural outdoor conditions and one set as 5°C warmer than the climate record from the previous years. Plant P uptake from 33P-labelled hydroxylapatite was enhanced in chamber-grown compared with outdoor seedlings for both tree species. This uptake was manifested in the clear radioactive images obtained over ca. 1 month after soil apatite application. Furthermore, all aboveground plant fractions of both spruce and pine seedlings showed a higher P uptake in warmer than colder daytime environments. The observed quantities and rates of P uptake from 33P-labelled hydroxylapatite by spruce (18 Bq g−1 hour−1) and pine (83 Bq g−1 hour−1; averages in chamber condition) are as to our knowledge unique observations. Natural forest soils in Sweden are often P-poor. Our research suggests that apatite-based P fertilization of spruce and pine forests can increase wood production by overcoming any existing P limitation.

随着全球磷(P)矿藏的减少,预计在未来几十年内,开采的磷矿石将成为稀缺资源。因此,矿物磷肥将越来越少,价格也将越来越高。因此,需要进一步了解其他磷资源,例如从铁矿副产品中提取的磷灰石肥料。林业是未来富磷灰石产品的潜在消费者,目的是每公顷获得更多木材。迄今为止,植物对磷灰石中钾的实际利用率几乎没有量化。因此,我们使用 33P 磷灰石在室内和室外条件下研究了树木对磷的吸收。我们研究了芬诺-斯堪的纳维亚林业中使用的两种主要针叶树种云杉(Picea abies)和松树(Pinus sylvestris)的钾吸收情况。我们合成了富含 33P 的磷灰石,并将其应用于云杉和松树幼苗生长的中置池中。随后,通过对植物体内的放射性进行(生物)成像,并在破坏性采收后对所有植物部分(叶、茎和根)和根瘤土壤进行液体闪烁计数(LSC),追踪 33P 标记羟基磷灰石对 P 的吸收情况。比较了两种气候条件,一种是室外自然条件,另一种是比前几年的气候记录温度高 5°C。与室外幼苗相比,两种树种在室内生长的幼苗从 33P 标记的羟基磷灰石中吸收的植物钾都有所增加。这种吸收表现在土壤施用磷灰石后约 1 个月内获得的清晰放射性图像上。在土壤中施用磷灰石约 1 个月后获得的清晰放射性图像中可以看出这种吸收。此外,云杉和松树幼苗的所有地上部分在温暖的白天环境中都比在寒冷的白天环境中吸收更多的磷。据我们所知,云杉(18 Bq g-1 小时-1)和松树(83 Bq g-1 小时-1;试验室条件下的平均值)从 33P 标记的羟基磷灰石中吸收钾的数量和速率都是独一无二的。瑞典的天然林土壤通常缺乏钾。我们的研究表明,对云杉和松树林进行磷灰石施肥可以克服任何现有的钾限制,从而提高木材产量。
{"title":"Spruce and pine utilization of phosphorus in soil amended with 33P-labelled hydroxylapatite","authors":"Louise Rütting,&nbsp;Diana Hofmann,&nbsp;Thomas Pütz,&nbsp;Matthias Konrad-Schmolke,&nbsp;Roland Bol","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13587","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mined rock phosphate is expected to become a scarce resource within the next few decades as global phosphorus (P) deposits are declining. As a result, mineral P fertilizer will be less available and more expensive. Therefore, improved knowledge is needed on other P resources, for example, apatite fertilizers derived from the by-products of iron mining. Forestry is a potential future consumer of apatite-rich products with the aim of obtaining more wood per hectare. The actual P availability in apatite to plants has so far been barely quantified. We therefore examined tree P uptake using <sup>33</sup>P apatite under chamber-grown and outdoor conditions. We examined the P uptake for the two main conifer species spruce (<i>Picea abies</i>) and pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i>) used in Fenno-Scandinavian forestry. We synthesized <sup>33</sup>P-enriched apatite and applied it to mesocosms with growing seedlings of spruce and pine. The P uptake from <sup>33</sup>P-labelled hydroxylapatite was subsequently traced by (bio)imaging of radioactivity in the plants and by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) upon destructive harvest in all plant fractions (leaves, stem and roots) and rhizosphere soil. Two climatic conditions were compared, one at natural outdoor conditions and one set as 5°C warmer than the climate record from the previous years. Plant P uptake from <sup>33</sup>P-labelled hydroxylapatite was enhanced in chamber-grown compared with outdoor seedlings for both tree species. This uptake was manifested in the clear radioactive images obtained over ca. 1 month after soil apatite application. Furthermore, all aboveground plant fractions of both spruce and pine seedlings showed a higher P uptake in warmer than colder daytime environments. The observed quantities and rates of P uptake from <sup>33</sup>P-labelled hydroxylapatite by spruce (18 Bq g<sup>−1</sup> hour<sup>−1</sup>) and pine (83 Bq g<sup>−1</sup> hour<sup>−1</sup>; averages in chamber condition) are as to our knowledge unique observations. Natural forest soils in Sweden are often P-poor. Our research suggests that apatite-based P fertilization of spruce and pine forests can increase wood production by overcoming any existing P limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13587","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microplastic fate in a chronosequence of biosolid-amended agricultural soil in Southern Ontario, Canada 加拿大安大略省南部经生物固体改良的农用土壤中的微塑料最终结果
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13592
Harriet Walker, Julian Aherne

Municipally sourced biosolids are commonly used as cost-effective fertilizers, diverting material from landfills and contributing to the circular economy. However, biosolids contain high concentrations of microplastics (MPs), which are emerging contaminants of concern due to their ubiquity in the environment. Despite this, there is a lack of environmentally relevant field studies. In 2022, composite topsoil samples (0–15 cm depth) were collected from seven agricultural fields in Southern Ontario, Canada, representing a chronosequence of biosolid applications ranging from 1 to 9 years since amendment and a control (untreated) field. MP particles down to 20 μm in size were extracted by density separation, enumerated, characterized by stereomicroscope and polymers identified using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. Here, we report on the characteristics, abundance and polymer type of MP particles in the study area to assess their fate in biosolid-amended soils. The average MP concentration among fields was 6.87 ± 1.47 MP g−1 (3.43 ± 0.74 mg MP kg−1). Additionally, the MP soil pool increased with repeated applications of biosolids. The dewatered biosolid plastic content of 8816 ± 1809 MP g−1 dry weight (11.6 ± 17.5 g MP kg−1 dry weight) was used to estimate a mean MP loading of 94.5 ± 10.9 kg ha−1 to each field per application, suggesting that 7% of the MP soil pool persisted over time. Quantifying the MP pool in biosolid-amended agricultural soil will inform evidence-based plastic policy changes in our global effort to understand and reduce plastic pollution.

城市来源的生物固体通常被用作具有成本效益的肥料,从垃圾填埋场转移材料并促进循环经济。然而,生物固体含有高浓度的微塑料 (MP),由于其在环境中无处不在,这些微塑料已成为令人担忧的新污染物。尽管如此,仍缺乏与环境相关的实地研究。2022 年,我们从加拿大安大略省南部的七块农田和一块对照(未处理)农田采集了复合表层土样本(0-15 厘米深),这七块农田代表了生物固体应用的时间序列,从添加后 1 年到 9 年不等。通过密度分离提取了小至 20 μm 的 MP 粒子,并用立体显微镜对其进行了计数和特征描述,还使用衰减全反射傅立叶变换红外光谱(ATR-FTIR)对聚合物进行了鉴定。在此,我们报告了研究区域中 MP 颗粒的特征、丰度和聚合物类型,以评估它们在生物固体改良土壤中的归宿。田间 MP 的平均浓度为 6.87 ± 1.47 MP g-1(3.43 ± 0.74 mg MP kg-1)。此外,随着生物固体的重复施用,土壤中的 MP 总量也在增加。根据脱水生物固体塑料含量 8816 ± 1809 MP g-1 干重(11.6 ± 17.5 g MP kg-1 干重)估算,每块田每次施用的平均 MP 负荷为 94.5 ± 10.9 kg ha-1,这表明 7% 的 MP 土壤库会长期存在。量化经生物固体改良的农业土壤中的多溴联苯醚池,将为我们在全球范围内了解和减少塑料污染的过程中改变塑料政策提供依据。
{"title":"Microplastic fate in a chronosequence of biosolid-amended agricultural soil in Southern Ontario, Canada","authors":"Harriet Walker,&nbsp;Julian Aherne","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13592","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Municipally sourced biosolids are commonly used as cost-effective fertilizers, diverting material from landfills and contributing to the circular economy. However, biosolids contain high concentrations of microplastics (MPs), which are emerging contaminants of concern due to their ubiquity in the environment. Despite this, there is a lack of environmentally relevant field studies. In 2022, composite topsoil samples (0–15 cm depth) were collected from seven agricultural fields in Southern Ontario, Canada, representing a chronosequence of biosolid applications ranging from 1 to 9 years since amendment and a control (untreated) field. MP particles down to 20 μm in size were extracted by density separation, enumerated, characterized by stereomicroscope and polymers identified using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. Here, we report on the characteristics, abundance and polymer type of MP particles in the study area to assess their fate in biosolid-amended soils. The average MP concentration among fields was 6.87 ± 1.47 MP g<sup>−1</sup> (3.43 ± 0.74 mg MP kg<sup>−1</sup>). Additionally, the MP soil pool increased with repeated applications of biosolids. The dewatered biosolid plastic content of 8816 ± 1809 MP g<sup>−1</sup> dry weight (11.6 ± 17.5 g MP kg<sup>−1</sup> dry weight) was used to estimate a mean MP loading of 94.5 ± 10.9 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> to each field per application, suggesting that 7% of the MP soil pool persisted over time. Quantifying the MP pool in biosolid-amended agricultural soil will inform evidence-based plastic policy changes in our global effort to understand and reduce plastic pollution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13592","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142435447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RUSSELL REVIEW Soil carbon stewardship: Thinking in circles RUSSELL REVIEW 土壤碳管理:绕圈子思考
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13536
H. Henry Janzen

The words we choose to describe our research ultimately directs its course. A dominant term in soil science now, is ‘sequestration’, referring to the removal of carbon (C) from air and its irreversible seclusion in soil, ideally as stable soil organic carbon (SOC). An emerging view, however, now sees SOC as an inherently dynamic assemblage of forms, all potentially vulnerable to decay, with no discrete, measurable fraction holding C in ‘sequestered’ form. Rather than speaking of C ‘sequestration’, then, we might refer instead to SOC ‘stewardship’. This word, now, enfolds the entire spectrum of SOC, not merely some elusive ‘persistent’ or ‘stable’ fraction, perhaps redirecting inquiry; for example, does C need to be ‘sequestered’ in stable form for SOC to serve as effective repository of excess atmospheric CO2? ‘Stewardship’ explicitly accepts the relentless turnover of SOC, emphasizing the need to manage not only fixed stocks of C, but also the cyclical flows of C through ecosystems that drive their functions. Among other benefits, ‘stewardship’ might motivate us to consider all functions of SOC (not only climate mitigation), consider the entire C cycle (not only enhancing soil C), and preserve existing troves of SOC (not only augmenting them in selected places.) Perhaps most fundamentally, by its etymology, ‘stewardship’ poses a compelling, timeless question: for whom do we steward SOC? Asking why look after SOC, not only reflects our own underlying quest for resilience, but also expands our potential audience and entices the more creative minds that must succeed us. Although ‘stewardship’ may elicit new and fruitful inquiry, we may need to look for words even more evocative, more alluring, more true to our mandate of living well within the circling C that must always sustain us.

我们在描述自己的研究时所选择的词语最终会决定研究的方向。目前,土壤科学的一个主要术语是 "固碳",指的是从空气中去除碳(C),并将其不可逆转地封存在土壤中,最好是形成稳定的土壤有机碳(SOC)。然而,一种新出现的观点认为,土壤有机碳是一种固有的动态组合形式,所有这些形式都有可能发生衰变,没有一个离散的、可测量的部分以 "固碳 "的形式持有碳。因此,与其说是碳 "固存",不如说是有机碳 "管理"。现在,这个词涵盖了 SOC 的整个范围,而不仅仅是某个难以捉摸的 "持久 "或 "稳定 "部分,这或许会重新引导人们的探究方向;例如,SOC 是否需要以稳定的形式 "封存 "C,才能有效地储存大气中过量的 CO2?管理 "明确接受 SOC 的无情更替,强调不仅需要管理固定的碳储量,还需要管理驱动生态系统功能的碳在生态系统中的周期性流动。除其他益处外,"管理 "可能促使我们考虑 SOC 的所有功能(而不仅仅是减缓气候),考虑整个碳循环(而不仅仅是增加土壤中的碳含量),并保护现有的 SOC 库(而不仅仅是在选定的地方增加它们)。为什么要保护可持续有机碳?这个问题不仅反映了我们对恢复能力的根本追求,而且还扩大了我们的潜在受众范围,吸引了必须继承我们事业的更具创造性的头脑。尽管 "管理 "可能会引发新的和富有成果的探究,但我们可能需要寻找更传神、更诱人、更忠实于我们任务的词语,即在必须始终支撑我们的 "C "圈内好好生活。
{"title":"RUSSELL REVIEW Soil carbon stewardship: Thinking in circles","authors":"H. Henry Janzen","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13536","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13536","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The words we choose to describe our research ultimately directs its course. A dominant term in soil science now, is ‘sequestration’, referring to the removal of carbon (C) from air and its irreversible seclusion in soil, ideally as stable soil organic carbon (SOC). An emerging view, however, now sees SOC as an inherently dynamic assemblage of forms, all potentially vulnerable to decay, with no discrete, measurable fraction holding C in ‘sequestered’ form. Rather than speaking of C ‘sequestration’, then, we might refer instead to SOC ‘stewardship’. This word, now, enfolds the entire spectrum of SOC, not merely some elusive ‘persistent’ or ‘stable’ fraction, perhaps redirecting inquiry; for example, does C need to be ‘sequestered’ in stable form for SOC to serve as effective repository of excess atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>? ‘Stewardship’ explicitly accepts the relentless turnover of SOC, emphasizing the need to manage not only fixed stocks of C, but also the cyclical flows of C through ecosystems that drive their functions. Among other benefits, ‘stewardship’ might motivate us to consider all functions of SOC (not only climate mitigation), consider the entire C cycle (not only enhancing soil C), and preserve existing troves of SOC (not only augmenting them in selected places.) Perhaps most fundamentally, by its etymology, ‘stewardship’ poses a compelling, timeless question: for <i>whom</i> do we steward SOC? Asking <i>why</i> look after SOC, not only reflects our own underlying quest for resilience, but also expands our potential audience and entices the more creative minds that must succeed us. Although ‘stewardship’ may elicit new and fruitful inquiry, we may need to look for words even more evocative, more alluring, more true to our mandate of living well within the circling C that must always sustain us.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13536","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introducing the Russell Review ‘Soil Carbon Stewardship: Thinking in Circles’ by H. Henry Janzen 介绍罗素评论《土壤碳管理》:H. Henry Janzen 的《圈子思维
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13590
Jennifer A. J. Dungait, Leo M. Condron

We have pleasure in introducing the latest EJSS Russell Review ‘Soil Carbon Stewardship: Thinking in Circles’ by Professor H. Henry Janzen (2024). The article forms the first of a series of our most prestigious invited reviews commissioned to celebrate the EJSS' 75th Anniversary (for further information see Dungait et al., 2024).

The author of this Russell Review, Prof H. Henry Janzen, is one of the world's foremost and respected experts on both the science and the philosophy of soil carbon and its integral place in sustaining our future on Earth. In this review, Prof Janzen eloquently makes the case for a new term, ‘carbon stewardship’, that emphasizes the essential relationship between society and soil carbon, and the urgent need to nurture it in all its forms. He presents a compelling argument for a radical change in the way we think and talk about the value that soils have for us.

The term ‘carbon sequestration’ was coined ~40 years ago. Both within and beyond academia, excitement about ‘carbon sequestration’ in soils as a nature-based solution to climate change continues to grow as the impacts of global warming manifest. Measuring, modelling and mapping soil carbon remain active areas of research, and considerable efforts have been expended to define ‘stable carbon’ and the underlying mechanisms leading to its stabilization, in order that this can be targeted to accrue soil carbon1.

In this Russell Review, Prof Janzen argues that the benefits of soil carbon to human society go far beyond just locking it away. Rather than referring to ‘carbon sequestration’, he suggests that we replace the term with ‘carbon stewardship’ that ‘denotes recognizing and valuing the benefits that SOC [soil organic carbon] offers to land and all its inhabitants, and then caring for this treasured entity on behalf of other current and future beneficiaries of its goodness’.

The ability to communicate one's scientific research in a way that captures hearts as well as minds is an enviable skill. It takes expertise, integrity and passion, and Prof Janzen has all of these ‘in spades’ (no soil science pun intended!). Anyone who has had the privilege of witnessing in person his presentations on the importance of the soil, and soil carbon in particular, cannot help but be inspired by his depth of knowledge of soil science and the power of his mesmeric storytelling. This ability extends to the written word, and the Invited Review published in the EJSS a decade ago, ‘Beyond carbon sequestration: soil as conduit of solar energy’ (Janzen, 2015), stimulated new ways of thinking about the carbon cycle, within and beyond academia. We are sure that this Russell Review will continue Prof Janzen's legacy of inspiration and commend it to EJSS' readers.

我们很高兴向您介绍最新的 EJSS 罗素评论 "土壤碳管理:Henry Janzen 教授撰写的 "Soil Carbon Stewardship: Thinking in Circles"(2024 年)。这篇文章是我们为庆祝 EJSS 成立 75 周年而撰写的一系列最负盛名的特邀评论中的第一篇(更多信息请参见 Dungait et al.在这篇评论中,Janzen 教授雄辩地提出了 "碳管理 "这一新术语,强调了社会与土壤碳之间的重要关系,以及以各种形式培育土壤碳的迫切需要。他提出了一个令人信服的论点,即彻底改变我们思考和谈论土壤价值的方式。随着全球变暖的影响逐渐显现,学术界内外对土壤 "碳封存 "作为一种基于自然的气候变化解决方案的热情持续高涨。土壤碳的测量、建模和绘图仍是活跃的研究领域,人们花费了大量精力来定义 "稳定碳 "及其稳定的内在机制,以便有针对性地积累土壤碳1。他建议我们不要使用 "碳封存 "一词,而代之以 "碳管理",即 "认识并重视 SOC(土壤有机碳)为土地及其所有居民带来的益处,然后代表当前和未来的其他受益者爱护这一珍贵的实体"。这需要专业知识、正直和激情,而 Janzen 教授 "完全 "具备这些条件(没有土壤科学的双关语!)。任何有幸亲眼目睹过他就土壤,尤其是土壤碳的重要性所做演讲的人,都会被他渊博的土壤科学知识和精彩的故事所感染。他的这种能力还延伸到了文字方面,十年前发表在 EJSS 上的特邀评论《碳封存之外:作为太阳能通道的土壤》(Janzen,2015 年)激发了学术界内外对碳循环的新思维。我们相信,这篇《罗素评论》将延续 Janzen 教授的灵感遗产,并向 EJSS 的读者推荐。
{"title":"Introducing the Russell Review ‘Soil Carbon Stewardship: Thinking in Circles’ by H. Henry Janzen","authors":"Jennifer A. J. Dungait,&nbsp;Leo M. Condron","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13590","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We have pleasure in introducing the latest <i>EJSS</i> Russell Review ‘<i>Soil Carbon Stewardship: Thinking in Circles</i>’ by Professor H. Henry Janzen (<span>2024</span>). The article forms the first of a series of our most prestigious invited reviews commissioned to celebrate the <i>EJSS</i>' 75th Anniversary (for further information see Dungait et al., <span>2024</span>).</p><p>The author of this Russell Review, Prof H. Henry Janzen, is one of the world's foremost and respected experts on both the science and the philosophy of soil carbon and its integral place in sustaining our future on Earth. In this review, Prof Janzen eloquently makes the case for a new term, ‘<i>carbon stewardship</i>’, that emphasizes the essential relationship between society and soil carbon, and the urgent need to nurture it in all its forms. He presents a compelling argument for a radical change in the way we think and talk about the value that soils have for us.</p><p>The term ‘carbon sequestration’ was coined ~40 years ago. Both within and beyond academia, excitement about ‘carbon sequestration’ in soils as a nature-based solution to climate change continues to grow as the impacts of global warming manifest. Measuring, modelling and mapping soil carbon remain active areas of research, and considerable efforts have been expended to define ‘stable carbon’ and the underlying mechanisms leading to its stabilization, in order that this can be targeted to accrue soil carbon<sup>1</sup>.</p><p>In this Russell Review, Prof Janzen argues that the benefits of soil carbon to human society go far beyond just locking it away. Rather than referring to ‘carbon sequestration’, he suggests that we replace the term with ‘<i>carbon stewardship</i>’ that ‘<i>denotes recognizing and valuing the benefits that SOC</i> [soil organic carbon] <i>offers to land and all its inhabitants, and then caring for this treasured entity on behalf of other current and future beneficiaries of its goodness</i>’.</p><p>The ability to communicate one's scientific research in a way that captures hearts as well as minds is an enviable skill. It takes expertise, integrity and passion, and Prof Janzen has all of these ‘in spades’ (no soil science pun intended!). Anyone who has had the privilege of witnessing in person his presentations on the importance of the soil, and soil carbon in particular, cannot help but be inspired by his depth of knowledge of soil science and the power of his mesmeric storytelling. This ability extends to the written word, and the Invited Review published in the <i>EJSS</i> a decade ago, ‘<i>Beyond carbon sequestration: soil as conduit of solar energy</i>’ (Janzen, <span>2015</span>), stimulated new ways of thinking about the carbon cycle, within and beyond academia. We are sure that this Russell Review will continue Prof Janzen's legacy of inspiration and commend it to <i>EJSS</i>' readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13590","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinct features of topsoil carbon fractions across urban forests in eastern China 中国东部城市森林表土碳组分的不同特征
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13586
Hongbo Guo, Tao He, Xiaofei Gao, Nan Xia, Yang Tang, Yuehan Tian, Enzai Du

Rapid urbanization has increased the areas of urban forests that store considerable soil carbon (C). Different soil C fractions may show distinctive contents and spatial patterns in view of their contrasting sensitivities to various drivers. However, current studies on soil C fractions are mostly limited to natural ecosystems and little is known about the large-scale patterns and drivers of soil C fractions in urban forests. Based on a field survey of urban forests across a north–south transect in eastern China, we analysed the spatial variations and main drivers of topsoil (surface layer, 0–10 cm; subsurface layer, 10–20 cm) C fractions (i.e., soil organic C, SOC; soil inorganic C, SIC; particulate organic C, POC; mineral-associated organic C, MAOC). Our results showed that topsoil contents of POC, MAOC and SOC changed non-linearly with latitude, with lowest values occurring in the cities in the warm temperate region. In contrast, SIC content showed the highest values in the warm temperate region. POC instead of MAOC was found to be a major fraction of SOC in urban forests. The spatial variation in topsoil POC content was mainly explained by mean annual temperature, soil clay and silt content, and park age. The spatial variation in MAOC content was mainly explained by soil clay and silt content, mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature and park age. In contrast, the spatial variation in SIC content was mainly explained by mean annual precipitation and soil pH. These findings demonstrate distinct features of different soil C fractions in urban forests and provide useful implications for urban soil carbon management.

快速的城市化增加了城市森林的面积,这些森林储存了大量的土壤碳(C)。鉴于不同土壤碳组分对各种驱动因素的敏感性不同,它们可能会表现出不同的含量和空间模式。然而,目前有关土壤碳组分的研究大多局限于自然生态系统,对城市森林土壤碳组分的大尺度模式和驱动因素知之甚少。基于对中国东部南北横断面城市森林的实地调查,我们分析了表土(表层,0-10 cm;地下层,10-20 cm)C组分(即土壤有机C,SOC;土壤无机C,SIC;颗粒有机C,POC;矿物相关有机C,MAOC)的空间变化和主要驱动因素。我们的研究结果表明,表层土壤中的 POC、MAOC 和 SOC 含量随纬度的变化呈非线性变化,其中暖温带地区城市的含量最低。相比之下,暖温带地区的 SIC 含量最高。在城市森林中,POC 而不是 MAOC 是 SOC 的主要成分。表土 POC 含量的空间变化主要由年平均温度、土壤粘土和粉土含量以及公园年龄解释。MAOC 含量的空间变化主要由土壤粘土和淤泥含量、年平均降水量、年平均气温和公园年龄解释。相比之下,SIC 含量的空间变化主要由年平均降水量和土壤 pH 值解释。这些研究结果表明了城市森林不同土壤碳组分的不同特征,为城市土壤碳管理提供了有益的启示。
{"title":"Distinct features of topsoil carbon fractions across urban forests in eastern China","authors":"Hongbo Guo,&nbsp;Tao He,&nbsp;Xiaofei Gao,&nbsp;Nan Xia,&nbsp;Yang Tang,&nbsp;Yuehan Tian,&nbsp;Enzai Du","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13586","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.13586","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapid urbanization has increased the areas of urban forests that store considerable soil carbon (C). Different soil C fractions may show distinctive contents and spatial patterns in view of their contrasting sensitivities to various drivers. However, current studies on soil C fractions are mostly limited to natural ecosystems and little is known about the large-scale patterns and drivers of soil C fractions in urban forests. Based on a field survey of urban forests across a north–south transect in eastern China, we analysed the spatial variations and main drivers of topsoil (surface layer, 0–10 cm; subsurface layer, 10–20 cm) C fractions (i.e., soil organic C, SOC; soil inorganic C, SIC; particulate organic C, POC; mineral-associated organic C, MAOC). Our results showed that topsoil contents of POC, MAOC and SOC changed non-linearly with latitude, with lowest values occurring in the cities in the warm temperate region. In contrast, SIC content showed the highest values in the warm temperate region. POC instead of MAOC was found to be a major fraction of SOC in urban forests. The spatial variation in topsoil POC content was mainly explained by mean annual temperature, soil clay and silt content, and park age. The spatial variation in MAOC content was mainly explained by soil clay and silt content, mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature and park age. In contrast, the spatial variation in SIC content was mainly explained by mean annual precipitation and soil pH. These findings demonstrate distinct features of different soil C fractions in urban forests and provide useful implications for urban soil carbon management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sugarcane harvesting systems in Brazil: Effects on soil carbon stocks and ethanol payback time 巴西的甘蔗收割系统:对土壤碳储量和乙醇投资回收期的影响
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13580
Stoécio Malta Ferreira Maia, Sávio Tavares Ferreira Borges, Aldair de Souza Medeiros

Replacing the burnt sugarcane harvesting system with unburnt sugarcane is important for the sustainability of the sugarcane sector in Brazil. Thus, quantifying the impact of the change in the sugarcane harvesting system on soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in Brazil is necessary, as it will allow the refinement of data on SOC, which is essential for the preparation of the national inventory of emissions and removal of greenhouse gases (GHGs), in addition to contributing to national public policies. We used data from both soil sampling and literature review in this study, resulting in 210 pairs of comparisons: 84 for the conversion from burnt sugarcane to unburnt sugarcane; 95 for the conversion from native vegetation to unburnt sugarcane; and 31 for the conversion from native vegetation to burnt sugarcane (NV–burnt), which we analysed using a mixed linear model. In Brazil and the South-Centre region, burnt–unburnt conversion results in a progressive increase in SOC stocks over time, in surface and subsurface layers. Over 20 years, the NV–burnt conversion showed SOC losses between 15% and 32%, and the NV–unburnt conversion showed losses between 27% and 35%. SOC change rates showed gains of 0.32 and 0.59 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for burnt–unburnt, and losses ranging from 0.82 to 1.06 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for conversions from native vegetation. The time required to offset the negative carbon balance of the NV–unburnt conversion is 6.4 and 8.2 years, being shorter than the payback time of the NV–burnt conversion, which is 9.9 and 9.2 years, in the 0–30 and 0–50 cm layers, respectively.

用非燃烧甘蔗取代燃烧甘蔗收割系统对于巴西甘蔗行业的可持续发展非常重要。因此,有必要量化甘蔗收割系统的变化对巴西土壤有机碳(SOC)存量的影响,因为这将有助于完善 SOC 数据,而 SOC 数据对于编制国家温室气体(GHG)排放和清除清单至关重要,此外还有助于制定国家公共政策。在这项研究中,我们使用了土壤取样和文献综述的数据,共得出 210 对比较结果:我们使用混合线性模型对这些数据进行了分析,其中 84 对比较了从烧毁甘蔗到未烧毁甘蔗的转化情况;95 对比较了从本地植被到未烧毁甘蔗的转化情况;31 对比较了从本地植被到烧毁甘蔗(NV-烧毁)的转化情况。在巴西和中南部地区,焚烧-未焚烧转换导致表层和地下 SOC 储量随时间逐渐增加。在 20 年的时间里,NV-焚烧转化的 SOC 损失率在 15%到 32%之间,NV-未焚烧转化的 SOC 损失率在 27%到 35%之间。烧毁-未烧毁转化的 SOC 变化率为每年每公顷 0.32 和 0.59 兆克碳,而从原生植被转化的 SOC 变化率为每年每公顷 0.82 至 1.06 兆克碳。在 0-30 厘米层和 0-50 厘米层,抵消 NV-unburnt 转换的负碳平衡所需的时间分别为 6.4 年和 8.2 年,短于 NV-burnt 转换的投资回收期(分别为 9.9 年和 9.2 年)。
{"title":"Sugarcane harvesting systems in Brazil: Effects on soil carbon stocks and ethanol payback time","authors":"Stoécio Malta Ferreira Maia,&nbsp;Sávio Tavares Ferreira Borges,&nbsp;Aldair de Souza Medeiros","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13580","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.13580","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Replacing the burnt sugarcane harvesting system with unburnt sugarcane is important for the sustainability of the sugarcane sector in Brazil. Thus, quantifying the impact of the change in the sugarcane harvesting system on soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in Brazil is necessary, as it will allow the refinement of data on SOC, which is essential for the preparation of the national inventory of emissions and removal of greenhouse gases (GHGs), in addition to contributing to national public policies. We used data from both soil sampling and literature review in this study, resulting in 210 pairs of comparisons: 84 for the conversion from burnt sugarcane to unburnt sugarcane; 95 for the conversion from native vegetation to unburnt sugarcane; and 31 for the conversion from native vegetation to burnt sugarcane (NV–burnt), which we analysed using a mixed linear model. In Brazil and the South-Centre region, burnt–unburnt conversion results in a progressive increase in SOC stocks over time, in surface and subsurface layers. Over 20 years, the NV–burnt conversion showed SOC losses between 15% and 32%, and the NV–unburnt conversion showed losses between 27% and 35%. SOC change rates showed gains of 0.32 and 0.59 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> for burnt–unburnt, and losses ranging from 0.82 to 1.06 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> for conversions from native vegetation. The time required to offset the negative carbon balance of the NV–unburnt conversion is 6.4 and 8.2 years, being shorter than the payback time of the NV–burnt conversion, which is 9.9 and 9.2 years, in the 0–30 and 0–50 cm layers, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals from application of sewage sludge on agricultural soils in Europe 欧洲农业土壤施用污水污泥产生的重金属生态风险评估
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13562
Felipe Yunta, Calogero Schillaci, Panos Panagos, Elise Van Eynde, Piotr Wojda, Arwyn Jones

The present European Union (EU) Sewage Sludge Directive (86/278/EEC) is undergoing modifications aimed at enhancing its applicability in the agricultural sector. The Directive's existing limit values for heavy metal concentrations in soils are in the process of being revised. However, to comprehensively understand their effects on EU agricultural lands, additional evaluations are necessary. This is particularly important given that ecological risk assessments are often performed on a site-specific basis, potentially overlooking broader regional implications. The main objective of the current work is to introduce a methodological approach to quantify the impact of sewage sludge (SS) application on agricultural soils in the EU and the United Kingdom. Concentrations of heavy metals (HMs) (Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) in agricultural land from Land Use/Land Cover Area Frame Survey (LUCAS) 2009 topsoil database were used as a baseline. Maximum quantities of SS that can be safely applied to agricultural lands were obtained by a modeling procedure was used to determine the maximum safe quantities of SS that can be applied to agricultural lands for each country within the European Member States and the United Kingdom. Accumulation of HMs in soils was modelled by using a representative SS composition, distributed over 10 successive years at 5 Mg ha−1 year−1 rate. Ecological risk impact was assessed by using both the single ecological risk index (Er) and the integrated potential ecological risk index (RI). Maximum quantities of SS applied on agricultural soils in EU + UK were estimated to be 45 Mg ha−1 at the country level. We found that 19% of agricultural land (around 28,471,900 ha) in the EU + UK shows a higher RI than moderate risk after long time application of the representative SS. We show that the combination of the HM concentrations from the LUCAS topsoil survey and assumptions on the SS composition and soil HM partitioning can be used to define the actual and potential soil pollution rate in EU + UK. We demonstrate that the proposed methodology can be used by policymakers, farmers, regional authorities and other stakeholders, with possible adaptions based on local in-depth soil and SS knowledge.

目前,欧盟(EU)正在对《污水污泥指令》(86/278/EEC)进行修改,以提高其在农业部门的适用性。该指令中关于土壤中重金属浓度的现有限值正在修订过程中。然而,为了全面了解重金属对欧盟农业用地的影响,有必要进行额外的评估。这一点尤为重要,因为生态风险评估通常是针对具体地点进行的,可能会忽略更广泛的区域影响。当前工作的主要目标是引入一种方法,量化污水污泥(SS)的施用对欧盟和英国农业土壤的影响。以 2009 年土地利用/土地覆盖面积框架调查(LUCAS)表土数据库中农田中的重金属(HMs)(镉、铜、汞、镍、铅和锌)浓度为基准。可安全施用于农田的最大 SS 量是通过建模程序获得的,该程序用于确定欧洲各成员国和英国可安全施用于农田的最大 SS 量。土壤中 HMs 的累积是通过使用具有代表性的 SS 成分来模拟的,该 SS 成分以 5 兆克/公顷-年-年的比率连续 10 年分布。生态风险影响通过使用单一生态风险指数(Er)和综合潜在生态风险指数(RI)进行评估。在欧盟和英国的农业土壤上施用 SS 的最大数量估计为 45 兆克/公顷-1。我们发现,欧盟+英国 19% 的农田(约 2847.19 万公顷)在长期施用具有代表性的 SS 后,RI 高于中度风险。我们表明,结合 LUCAS 表层土调查得出的 HM 浓度以及对 SS 成分和土壤 HM 分配的假设,可用于确定欧盟+英国的实际和潜在土壤污染率。我们证明,政策制定者、农民、地区当局和其他利益相关者可以使用所建议的方法,并可根据对当地土壤和 SS 的深入了解进行调整。
{"title":"Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals from application of sewage sludge on agricultural soils in Europe","authors":"Felipe Yunta,&nbsp;Calogero Schillaci,&nbsp;Panos Panagos,&nbsp;Elise Van Eynde,&nbsp;Piotr Wojda,&nbsp;Arwyn Jones","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13562","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.13562","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present European Union (EU) Sewage Sludge Directive (86/278/EEC) is undergoing modifications aimed at enhancing its applicability in the agricultural sector. The Directive's existing limit values for heavy metal concentrations in soils are in the process of being revised. However, to comprehensively understand their effects on EU agricultural lands, additional evaluations are necessary. This is particularly important given that ecological risk assessments are often performed on a site-specific basis, potentially overlooking broader regional implications. The main objective of the current work is to introduce a methodological approach to quantify the impact of sewage sludge (SS) application on agricultural soils in the EU and the United Kingdom. Concentrations of heavy metals (HMs) (Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) in agricultural land from Land Use/Land Cover Area Frame Survey (LUCAS) 2009 topsoil database were used as a baseline. Maximum quantities of SS that can be safely applied to agricultural lands were obtained by a modeling procedure was used to determine the maximum safe quantities of SS that can be applied to agricultural lands for each country within the European Member States and the United Kingdom. Accumulation of HMs in soils was modelled by using a representative SS composition, distributed over 10 successive years at 5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> rate. Ecological risk impact was assessed by using both the single ecological risk index (E<sub>r</sub>) and the integrated potential ecological risk index (RI). Maximum quantities of SS applied on agricultural soils in EU + UK were estimated to be 45 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> at the country level. We found that 19% of agricultural land (around 28,471,900 ha) in the EU + UK shows a higher RI than moderate risk after long time application of the representative SS. We show that the combination of the HM concentrations from the LUCAS topsoil survey and assumptions on the SS composition and soil HM partitioning can be used to define the actual and potential soil pollution rate in EU + UK. We demonstrate that the proposed methodology can be used by policymakers, farmers, regional authorities and other stakeholders, with possible adaptions based on local in-depth soil and SS knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13562","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tracing of fire-induced soil phosphorus transformations using phosphate oxygen isotope ratio 利用磷氧同位素比值追踪火灾引起的土壤磷转化
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13591
Takuya Ishida, Isao Hirota, Satoshi Yokoyama

This study demonstrates that phosphate oxygen isotope (δ18OPO4) analysis effectively detects and monitors fire-induced transformation in soil phosphorus (P). Fires increase bioavailable P, potentially limiting primary production in terrestrial ecosystems. However, understanding the effects of fire on soil P dynamics in the field remains challenging due to the interaction between fire spread and soil properties with high spatial heterogeneity. Soil burning experiments were conducted using a surface soil sample collected in central Japan. The soil was burned in an electric furnace from 50 to 550°C for 3 h, and P concentrations and δ18OPO4 values were determined. The results revealed that high temperatures (>350°C) depleted the soil of organic P (Po) and increased labile and stable inorganic P (Pi) concentrations while significantly decreasing δ18OPO4 values. By contrast, low temperatures (150°C) increased labile Pi and Po concentrations without isotopic shift, indicating that low-intensity fires could increase bioavailable P while conserving soil organic matter. These findings indicate that δ18OPO4 analysis can provide insight into the relationship between P transformations and fire intensity and track subsequent changes in P dynamics over time. Our research highlights the potential of δ18OPO4 in predicting and managing postfire ecological and agricultural impacts.

本研究证明,磷氧同位素(δ18OPO4)分析可有效检测和监测火灾引起的土壤磷(P)转化。火灾会增加生物可利用的磷,从而可能限制陆地生态系统的初级生产。然而,由于火灾蔓延与具有高度空间异质性的土壤特性之间的相互作用,了解火灾对实地土壤磷动态的影响仍然具有挑战性。我们利用在日本中部采集的地表土壤样本进行了土壤燃烧实验。土壤在 50 至 550°C 的电炉中燃烧了 3 小时,并测定了 P 浓度和 δ18OPO4 值。结果表明,高温(350°C)消耗了土壤中的有机钾(Po),增加了易变和稳定的无机钾(Pi)浓度,同时显著降低了δ18OPO4 值。与此相反,低温(150°C)增加了可溶性 Pi 和 Po 的浓度,但没有发生同位素偏移,这表明低强度火灾可以在保护土壤有机质的同时增加生物可利用的 P。这些研究结果表明,δ18OPO4 分析可以让人们深入了解钾转化与火灾强度之间的关系,并跟踪钾动态随时间的后续变化。我们的研究强调了 δ18OPO4 在预测和管理火灾后对生态和农业影响方面的潜力。
{"title":"Tracing of fire-induced soil phosphorus transformations using phosphate oxygen isotope ratio","authors":"Takuya Ishida,&nbsp;Isao Hirota,&nbsp;Satoshi Yokoyama","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13591","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.13591","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study demonstrates that phosphate oxygen isotope (δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>PO4</sub>) analysis effectively detects and monitors fire-induced transformation in soil phosphorus (P). Fires increase bioavailable P, potentially limiting primary production in terrestrial ecosystems. However, understanding the effects of fire on soil P dynamics in the field remains challenging due to the interaction between fire spread and soil properties with high spatial heterogeneity. Soil burning experiments were conducted using a surface soil sample collected in central Japan. The soil was burned in an electric furnace from 50 to 550°C for 3 h, and P concentrations and δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>PO4</sub> values were determined. The results revealed that high temperatures (&gt;350°C) depleted the soil of organic P (P<sub>o</sub>) and increased labile and stable inorganic P (P<sub>i</sub>) concentrations while significantly decreasing δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>PO4</sub> values. By contrast, low temperatures (150°C) increased labile P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> concentrations without isotopic shift, indicating that low-intensity fires could increase bioavailable P while conserving soil organic matter. These findings indicate that δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>PO4</sub> analysis can provide insight into the relationship between P transformations and fire intensity and track subsequent changes in P dynamics over time. Our research highlights the potential of δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>PO4</sub> in predicting and managing postfire ecological and agricultural impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13591","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping soil thickness by accounting for right-censored data with survival probabilities and machine learning 利用生存概率和机器学习计算右删失数据,绘制土壤厚度图
IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13589
Stephan van der Westhuizen, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, David P. Hofmeyr, Laura Poggio, Madlene Nussbaum, Colby Brungard

In digital soil mapping, modelling soil thickness poses a challenge due to the prevalent issue of right-censored data. This means that the true soil thickness exceeds the depth of sampling, and neglecting to account for the censored nature of the data can lead to poor model performance and underestimation of the true soil thickness. Survival analysis is a well-established domain of statistical modelling that can deal with censored data. The random survival forest is a notable example of a survival-related machine learning approach used to address right-censored soil property data in digital soil mapping. Previous studies that employed this model either focused on mapping the probability of soil thickness exceeding certain depths, and thereby not mapping soil thickness itself, or dismissed it due to perceived poor performance. In this study, we propose an alternative survival model to map soil thickness that is based on the inverse probability of censoring weighting. In this approach, calibration data are weighted by the inverse of the probability that soil thickness exceeds a certain depth, that is, a survival probability. These weights can then be used with most machine learning models. We used the weights with a regular random forest, and compared it with a random survival forest, and other strategies for handling right-censored data, through a comprehensive synthetic simulation study and two real-world case studies. The results suggest that the weighted random forest model produces competitive predictions, establishing it as a viable option for mapping right-censored soil property data.

在数字土壤测绘中,由于普遍存在右删失数据问题,土壤厚度建模是一项挑战。这意味着真实的土壤厚度超过了采样深度,如果忽略数据的删减特性,就会导致模型性能不佳,低估真实的土壤厚度。生存分析是统计建模的一个成熟领域,可以处理有删减的数据。随机生存林就是一个与生存相关的机器学习方法的典型例子,用于处理数字土壤制图中的右删失土壤属性数据。以往采用该模型的研究要么侧重于绘制土壤厚度超过特定深度的概率图,从而不绘制土壤厚度图本身,要么因认为该模型性能不佳而将其排除在外。在本研究中,我们提出了另一种绘制土壤厚度的生存模型,该模型基于普查加权的逆概率。在这种方法中,校准数据根据土壤厚度超过一定深度的概率的倒数(即生存概率)进行加权。这些权重可用于大多数机器学习模型。我们将权重用于常规随机森林,并通过全面的合成模拟研究和两个实际案例研究,将其与随机生存森林和其他处理右删失数据的策略进行了比较。结果表明,加权随机森林模型能做出有竞争力的预测,是绘制右删失土壤属性数据的可行选择。
{"title":"Mapping soil thickness by accounting for right-censored data with survival probabilities and machine learning","authors":"Stephan van der Westhuizen,&nbsp;Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,&nbsp;David P. Hofmeyr,&nbsp;Laura Poggio,&nbsp;Madlene Nussbaum,&nbsp;Colby Brungard","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13589","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ejss.13589","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In digital soil mapping, modelling soil thickness poses a challenge due to the prevalent issue of right-censored data. This means that the true soil thickness exceeds the depth of sampling, and neglecting to account for the censored nature of the data can lead to poor model performance and underestimation of the true soil thickness. Survival analysis is a well-established domain of statistical modelling that can deal with censored data. The random survival forest is a notable example of a survival-related machine learning approach used to address right-censored soil property data in digital soil mapping. Previous studies that employed this model either focused on mapping the probability of soil thickness exceeding certain depths, and thereby not mapping soil thickness itself, or dismissed it due to perceived poor performance. In this study, we propose an alternative survival model to map soil thickness that is based on the inverse probability of censoring weighting. In this approach, calibration data are weighted by the inverse of the probability that soil thickness exceeds a certain depth, that is, a survival probability. These weights can then be used with most machine learning models. We used the weights with a regular random forest, and compared it with a random survival forest, and other strategies for handling right-censored data, through a comprehensive synthetic simulation study and two real-world case studies. The results suggest that the weighted random forest model produces competitive predictions, establishing it as a viable option for mapping right-censored soil property data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13589","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142384216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1