首页 > 最新文献

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology最新文献

英文 中文
Effects of nicotine patches on early and late attentional bias to smoking cues: We may know less than we think. 尼古丁贴片对吸烟线索早期和晚期注意偏差的影响:我们知道的可能比我们想象的要少。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000707
Bryant M Stone, Jonathan J Hammersley, Norka E Rabinovich, David G Gilbert

In contrast to overnight deprivation versus satiety studies, a small number of placebo-controlled studies have failed to find that nicotine administration reduces attentional bias (AB) to smoking cues. To assess the reliability of this failure and to address the duration and salience of AB in smokers versus never-smokers, we used a longer-than-typical (i.e., 3,000 ms) smoking cue-presentation time in a placebo-controlled trial of smokers and never-smokers. We aimed to assess whether a nicotine patch (i.e., active vs. placebo) attenuates continuously assessed eye gaze-measured AB to smoking cues across 3,000 ms in 32 habitual, overnight-deprived smokers and smoker-nonsmoker differences compared to 32 never-smokers. We presented a series of picture pairs (i.e., one smoking-related and one affectively neutral control picture) simultaneously to assess AB. Participants attended a 14 mg nicotine patch and a placebo patch session in a randomized order. The habitual smokers were 12-18 hr nicotine-deprived during both sessions. Smokers demonstrated a stronger AB toward smoking cues than never-smokers across the entire 3,000 ms cue-presentation time. Nicotine did not significantly reduce the AB to smoking cues but the AB was strongly and positively related to deprivation-associated cravings in smokers. Patch-delivered nicotine did not reduce AB to smoking cues presented for up to 3,000 ms, even though smoker-nonsmoker differences in bias remained. Assessments of longer cue presentations and more subtle cues may provide nuance not currently captured by existing studies, because of potential demand effects in designs that contrast overnight versus sated state effects on AB. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

与过夜剥夺与饱腹感研究不同的是,少量安慰剂对照研究未能发现尼古丁给药能减少对吸烟提示的注意偏差(AB)。为了评估这种失败的可靠性,并解决吸烟者与从不吸烟者注意力偏差的持续时间和显著性问题,我们在吸烟者和从不吸烟者的安慰剂对照试验中使用了比典型时间更长(即 3,000 毫秒)的吸烟线索呈现时间。我们的目的是评估尼古丁贴片(即活性贴片与安慰剂贴片)与 32 名从不吸烟者相比,是否会在 3,000 毫秒内减弱连续评估的眼球注视测量的吸烟提示 AB 值。我们同时展示了一系列图片对(即一张与吸烟相关的图片和一张情感中性的对照图片)来评估 AB。参与者按随机顺序参加了 14 毫克尼古丁贴片和安慰剂贴片的测试。在这两个环节中,习惯吸烟者的尼古丁缺失时间均为 12-18 小时。在整个 3,000 毫秒的线索呈现时间内,吸烟者比从不吸烟者对吸烟线索表现出更强的 AB。尼古丁并未明显降低吸烟者对吸烟暗示的AB值,但吸烟者的AB值与剥夺相关的渴求度呈强烈的正相关。虽然吸烟者与非吸烟者在偏差上的差异仍然存在,但贴片尼古丁并没有减少吸烟提示呈现时间长达 3,000 毫秒时的 AB 值。对时间更长的提示和更微妙的提示进行评估可能会提供现有研究无法捕捉到的细微差别,因为在设计中对比了隔夜和饱食状态对 AB 的影响,可能会产生需求效应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Effects of nicotine patches on early and late attentional bias to smoking cues: We may know less than we think.","authors":"Bryant M Stone, Jonathan J Hammersley, Norka E Rabinovich, David G Gilbert","doi":"10.1037/pha0000707","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to overnight deprivation versus satiety studies, a small number of placebo-controlled studies have failed to find that nicotine administration reduces attentional bias (AB) to smoking cues. To assess the reliability of this failure and to address the duration and salience of AB in smokers versus never-smokers, we used a longer-than-typical (i.e., 3,000 ms) smoking cue-presentation time in a placebo-controlled trial of smokers and never-smokers. We aimed to assess whether a nicotine patch (i.e., active vs. placebo) attenuates continuously assessed eye gaze-measured AB to smoking cues across 3,000 ms in 32 habitual, overnight-deprived smokers and smoker-nonsmoker differences compared to 32 never-smokers. We presented a series of picture pairs (i.e., one smoking-related and one affectively neutral control picture) simultaneously to assess AB. Participants attended a 14 mg nicotine patch and a placebo patch session in a randomized order. The habitual smokers were 12-18 hr nicotine-deprived during both sessions. Smokers demonstrated a stronger AB toward smoking cues than never-smokers across the entire 3,000 ms cue-presentation time. Nicotine did not significantly reduce the AB to smoking cues but the AB was strongly and positively related to deprivation-associated cravings in smokers. Patch-delivered nicotine did not reduce AB to smoking cues presented for up to 3,000 ms, even though smoker-nonsmoker differences in bias remained. Assessments of longer cue presentations and more subtle cues may provide nuance not currently captured by existing studies, because of potential demand effects in designs that contrast overnight versus sated state effects on AB. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139706425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cigarette smoking and cognitive task performance: Experimental effects of very-low nicotine-content cigarettes. 吸烟与认知任务表现:尼古丁含量极低的香烟的实验效果。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000724
Brian R Katz, Diann E Gaalema, Julie A Dumas, Sarah H Heil, Stacey C Sigmon, Jennifer W Tidey, Dustin C Lee, Michael DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins

Reductions in the nicotine content of cigarettes decrease smoking rate and dependence severity, but effects on cognition are less well established. The potential impacts of very-low nicotine-content (VLNC) cigarettes on cognitive task performance must be evaluated, especially in vulnerable populations. The aim of the present study is to experimentally examine the effects of VLNC cigarettes on cognitive performance. Adults who smoked daily (n = 775) from three vulnerable populations (socioeconomically disadvantaged reproductive-age women, individuals with opioid use disorder, affective disorders) were examined. Participants were randomly assigned to normal nicotine content (NNC; 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or VLNC (2.4 mg/g or 0.4 mg/g) cigarettes for 12 weeks. Response inhibition (stop-signal task), working memory (n-back task; n of 2-n of 0), and cognitive interference (nicotine Stroop task) were assessed at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Results were analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures analyses of variance. Extended exposure to VLNC cigarettes produced no significant changes in any measure of cognitive performance compared to NNC cigarettes. Over weeks, response times on the n-back task decreased across doses. No significant effects were observed on the stop-signal or nicotine Stroop tasks. All three vulnerable populations performed comparably on all three cognitive tasks. Extended exposure to VLNC cigarettes produced no impairments in cognitive performance on any of the assessed tasks compared to NNC cigarettes. These findings are consistent with the larger literature detailing other consequences following exposure to VLNC cigarettes and are encouraging for the adoption of a nicotine-reduction policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

减少香烟中的尼古丁含量可以降低吸烟率和对烟草依赖的严重程度,但对认知能力的影响还没有得到很好的证实。必须评估尼古丁含量极低(VLNC)香烟对认知任务表现的潜在影响,尤其是对易受伤害人群的影响。本研究的目的是通过实验检验极低尼古丁含量香烟对认知能力的影响。研究对象是每天吸烟的成年人(n = 775),他们来自三个弱势人群(社会经济条件较差的育龄妇女、阿片类药物使用障碍患者和情感障碍患者)。参与者被随机分配到尼古丁含量正常(NNC;15.8 毫克尼古丁/克烟草)或 VLNC(2.4 毫克/克或 0.4 毫克/克)香烟中,为期 12 周。分别在基线、2周、6周和12周对反应抑制(停止信号任务)、工作记忆(n-back任务;n为2-n为0)和认知干扰(尼古丁Stroop任务)进行评估。结果采用混合模型重复测量方差分析。与 NNC 卷烟相比,长期吸食 VLNC 卷烟在认知能力的任何指标上都不会产生显著变化。在数周内,不同剂量卷烟在n-back任务上的反应时间均有所缩短。在停止信号或尼古丁 Stroop 任务中没有观察到明显的影响。所有三种易感人群在所有三种认知任务上的表现都相当。与 NNC 卷烟相比,长期吸食 VLNC 卷烟在任何一项评估任务上的认知表现都不会受到影响。这些研究结果与更多文献详细描述的接触 VLNC 卷烟后的其他后果相一致,对于采用尼古丁减排政策具有鼓舞作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Cigarette smoking and cognitive task performance: Experimental effects of very-low nicotine-content cigarettes.","authors":"Brian R Katz, Diann E Gaalema, Julie A Dumas, Sarah H Heil, Stacey C Sigmon, Jennifer W Tidey, Dustin C Lee, Michael DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins","doi":"10.1037/pha0000724","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reductions in the nicotine content of cigarettes decrease smoking rate and dependence severity, but effects on cognition are less well established. The potential impacts of very-low nicotine-content (VLNC) cigarettes on cognitive task performance must be evaluated, especially in vulnerable populations. The aim of the present study is to experimentally examine the effects of VLNC cigarettes on cognitive performance. Adults who smoked daily (<i>n</i> = 775) from three vulnerable populations (socioeconomically disadvantaged reproductive-age women, individuals with opioid use disorder, affective disorders) were examined. Participants were randomly assigned to normal nicotine content (NNC; 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or VLNC (2.4 mg/g or 0.4 mg/g) cigarettes for 12 weeks. Response inhibition (stop-signal task), working memory (<i>n</i>-back task; <i>n</i> of 2-<i>n</i> of 0), and cognitive interference (nicotine Stroop task) were assessed at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Results were analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures analyses of variance. Extended exposure to VLNC cigarettes produced no significant changes in any measure of cognitive performance compared to NNC cigarettes. Over weeks, response times on the <i>n</i>-back task decreased across doses. No significant effects were observed on the stop-signal or nicotine Stroop tasks. All three vulnerable populations performed comparably on all three cognitive tasks. Extended exposure to VLNC cigarettes produced no impairments in cognitive performance on any of the assessed tasks compared to NNC cigarettes. These findings are consistent with the larger literature detailing other consequences following exposure to VLNC cigarettes and are encouraging for the adoption of a nicotine-reduction policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140897366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pain and withdrawal are common among patients receiving medications for opioid use disorder and associated with pain catastrophizing, negative affect, and poor sleep. 在接受阿片类药物治疗的患者中,疼痛和戒断是常见现象,并与疼痛灾难化、消极情绪和睡眠不佳有关。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000723
Meredith S Berry, Kelly E Dunn

Substantial percentages of persons receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) continue to experience clinically significant levels of pain and opioid withdrawal, which may pose barriers to reducing opioid use. Continued pain, in particular, may increase the risk for psychiatric problems and poorer treatment retention, especially with a lack of adequate care for pain. The goals of these analyses were to characterize the prevalence of, and patient-level variables associated with, pain and opioid withdrawal, as well as utilization of related coping strategies and treatments. Participants were 18 years of age or older and received methadone or buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (n = 179). Participants completed this survey in person, within their MOUD clinic. Participants completed patient-level and demographic questions as well as measures of pain, withdrawal, utilization of related coping strategies, and pain treatment. Numerous participants endorsed chronic pain (41.9%) or opioid withdrawal (89.4%) and indicated reliance upon over-the-counter medications and prayer for pain management. Multiple linear regression models showed greater pain catastrophizing and negative affect accounted for variability in pain severity and pain interference, as well as opioid withdrawal. Persons who slept less and endorsed chronic pain also reported greater pain severity and interference, and pain interference was higher with increased age. These and previous findings combine to further highlight the detrimental role that pain catastrophizing and negative affect can play in pain perception and withdrawal, but also represent promising treatment targets to facilitate pain and withdrawal management and improved quality of life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在接受阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物治疗的患者中,有相当大比例的人仍会出现临床上明显的疼痛和阿片类药物戒断症状,这可能会对减少阿片类药物的使用构成障碍。尤其是持续的疼痛可能会增加出现精神问题的风险,并降低治疗的持续性,特别是在缺乏对疼痛的适当护理的情况下。这些分析的目的是确定疼痛和阿片类药物戒断的发生率、与疼痛和阿片类药物戒断相关的患者水平变量,以及相关应对策略和治疗方法的使用情况。参与者年龄在 18 岁或以上,接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(n = 179)。参与者在其 MOUD 诊所内亲自完成了这项调查。参与者填写了患者层面和人口统计学问题,以及疼痛、戒断、相关应对策略的使用和疼痛治疗的测量。许多参与者表示有慢性疼痛(41.9%)或阿片类药物戒断(89.4%),并表示依赖非处方药和祈祷来控制疼痛。多元线性回归模型显示,更严重的疼痛灾难化和负面情绪导致了疼痛严重程度和疼痛干扰以及阿片类药物戒断的变化。睡眠较少且认可慢性疼痛的人也报告了更大的疼痛严重性和干扰,年龄越大,疼痛干扰越大。这些研究结果与之前的研究结果相结合,进一步凸显了疼痛灾难化和负面情绪在疼痛感知和戒断中的不利作用,同时也是促进疼痛和戒断管理以及提高生活质量的有前途的治疗目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Pain and withdrawal are common among patients receiving medications for opioid use disorder and associated with pain catastrophizing, negative affect, and poor sleep.","authors":"Meredith S Berry, Kelly E Dunn","doi":"10.1037/pha0000723","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substantial percentages of persons receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) continue to experience clinically significant levels of pain and opioid withdrawal, which may pose barriers to reducing opioid use. Continued pain, in particular, may increase the risk for psychiatric problems and poorer treatment retention, especially with a lack of adequate care for pain. The goals of these analyses were to characterize the prevalence of, and patient-level variables associated with, pain and opioid withdrawal, as well as utilization of related coping strategies and treatments. Participants were 18 years of age or older and received methadone or buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (<i>n</i> = 179). Participants completed this survey in person, within their MOUD clinic. Participants completed patient-level and demographic questions as well as measures of pain, withdrawal, utilization of related coping strategies, and pain treatment. Numerous participants endorsed chronic pain (41.9%) or opioid withdrawal (89.4%) and indicated reliance upon over-the-counter medications and prayer for pain management. Multiple linear regression models showed greater pain catastrophizing and negative affect accounted for variability in pain severity and pain interference, as well as opioid withdrawal. Persons who slept less and endorsed chronic pain also reported greater pain severity and interference, and pain interference was higher with increased age. These and previous findings combine to further highlight the detrimental role that pain catastrophizing and negative affect can play in pain perception and withdrawal, but also represent promising treatment targets to facilitate pain and withdrawal management and improved quality of life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140897369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and validation of a reasons for electronic cigarette use questionnaire. 电子香烟使用原因问卷的开发与验证。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000702
David M Ledgerwood, Danishi K Bedi, Mannat K Bedi, Ciara N Cannoy, Krithika Prakash, Alanna E Foulon, ShayLin Excell, Leslie H Lundahl

People use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for many reasons, but currently there are no comprehensive assessments of the motivations for tobacco vaping. The aim of the present study is to develop and test the initial construct validity of a new measure to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. We developed a 56-item measure based on the e-cigarette literature. This measure, along with demographic and tobacco use questions, was administered to adults who self-identified as past or present e-cigarette users on the Prolific crowdsourcing platform. The sample (n = 965) was randomly assigned into two analytic groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 484) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 481). The sample ranged from 19 to 77 (M = 36.6; SD = 11.5) years old, and 42.2% identified as women, 74.6% as White, 7.2% as African American, 4.7% as Asian/Pacific Islander, and 5.1% Hispanic/Latino. After removing highly correlated items and nonloading items on the EFA, the 56-item scale was reduced to 47 items across eight factors. The eight subscales assessing various motivation domains of e-cigarette use included social influence, alternative to cigarettes, pleasurable effects, harm reduction, dependence, cessation, weight/appetite, and smell/flavor domains. Cronbach's α coefficients and preliminary analyses of differential motivation based on sex, age, and daily smoker status are presented. This study demonstrates the construct validity for the first comprehensive measure tested to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. This measure has potential to become a valuable assessment for researchers examining factors contributing to tobacco vaping among a variety of populations and settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

人们使用电子烟(电子烟)的原因很多,但目前还没有对吸烟动机的全面评估。本研究的目的是开发和测试一种新的评估电子烟使用原因的方法的初步构建有效性。我们在电子烟文献的基础上开发了56个项目的测量方法。我们在 Prolific 众包平台上对自我认同为过去或现在的电子烟用户的成年人施测了该测量方法以及人口统计学和烟草使用问题。样本(n = 965)被随机分配到两个分析组,分别进行探索性因子分析(EFA;n = 484)和确认性因子分析(CFA;n = 481)。样本年龄从 19 岁到 77 岁(M = 36.6;SD = 11.5)不等,42.2% 为女性,74.6% 为白人,7.2% 为非裔美国人,4.7% 为亚太裔美国人,5.1% 为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人。在去除 EFA 中的高相关性项目和非负荷项目后,56 个项目的量表缩减为 47 个项目,涵盖 8 个因子。评估电子烟使用动机各领域的八个分量表包括社会影响、香烟替代品、愉悦效果、减害、依赖、戒烟、体重/食欲和气味/风味领域。本研究给出了 Cronbach's α 系数,并初步分析了基于性别、年龄和日常吸烟状况的不同动机。这项研究证明了首个用于评估电子烟使用原因的综合测量方法的建构有效性。对于研究人员在不同人群和环境中研究导致吸食烟草的因素而言,该测量方法有可能成为一种有价值的评估方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Development and validation of a reasons for electronic cigarette use questionnaire.","authors":"David M Ledgerwood, Danishi K Bedi, Mannat K Bedi, Ciara N Cannoy, Krithika Prakash, Alanna E Foulon, ShayLin Excell, Leslie H Lundahl","doi":"10.1037/pha0000702","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for many reasons, but currently there are no comprehensive assessments of the motivations for tobacco vaping. The aim of the present study is to develop and test the initial construct validity of a new measure to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. We developed a 56-item measure based on the e-cigarette literature. This measure, along with demographic and tobacco use questions, was administered to adults who self-identified as past or present e-cigarette users on the Prolific crowdsourcing platform. The sample (<i>n</i> = 965) was randomly assigned into two analytic groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; <i>n</i> = 484) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; <i>n</i> = 481). The sample ranged from 19 to 77 (<i>M</i> = 36.6; <i>SD</i> = 11.5) years old, and 42.2% identified as women, 74.6% as White, 7.2% as African American, 4.7% as Asian/Pacific Islander, and 5.1% Hispanic/Latino. After removing highly correlated items and nonloading items on the EFA, the 56-item scale was reduced to 47 items across eight factors. The eight subscales assessing various motivation domains of e-cigarette use included social influence, alternative to cigarettes, pleasurable effects, harm reduction, dependence, cessation, weight/appetite, and smell/flavor domains. Cronbach's α coefficients and preliminary analyses of differential motivation based on sex, age, and daily smoker status are presented. This study demonstrates the construct validity for the first comprehensive measure tested to assess reasons for e-cigarette use. This measure has potential to become a valuable assessment for researchers examining factors contributing to tobacco vaping among a variety of populations and settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139485348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discriminative stimulus properties of two training doses of gabapentin in rats: Substitution by pregabalin, diazepam, and pentobarbital. 两种训练剂量加巴喷丁对大鼠的辨别刺激特性:用普瑞巴林、地西泮和戊巴比妥替代。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000704
Adam J Prus, Madeline T Van Fossen, Alexandria N Iannucci, Alexia G Dalton, Joshua N Prete

Gabapentin is used for the treatment of many conditions, including seizures, pain, and anxiety. Increasing reports of nonprescribed use suggest that gabapentin may elicit positive subjective effects. The present study was conducted to examine the subjective effects of gabapentin using rats trained to discriminate either a 30.0 mg/kg or 300.0 mg/kg dose of gabapentin versus vehicle on a two-choice drug discrimination task. Both doses of gabapentin were established as discriminative stimuli, and the 300.0 mg/kg dose was more readily established compared to the 30.0 mg/kg dose. Full substitution (> 80% gabapentin-lever responding) occurred by the training drug and by the gabapentinoid compound pregabalin. Partial substitution (> 20% gabapentin-lever responding) was shown by the opioid compounds morphine and fentanyl, and dose combinations of the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone with the gabapentin training doses reduced the percentage of gabapentin-lever responding to below 80%. Partial substitution for both training doses of gabapentin occurred with the cannabinoid Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol. The barbiturate compound pentobarbital and the benzodiazepine compound diazepam were only tested for substitution for the 300.0 mg/kg dose of gabapentin and these compounds produced full substitution. These findings demonstrate that gabapentin establishes a robust discriminative cue and exhibits stimulus effects closely similar to pregabalin, pentobarbital, and diazepam. Since pregabalin, pentobarbital, and diazepam carry a risk of problematic use and are classified as controlled substances, further evaluations of gabapentin's risks in this regard are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

加巴喷丁可用于治疗多种疾病,包括癫痫发作、疼痛和焦虑。越来越多的非处方使用报告表明,加巴喷丁可能会引起积极的主观效应。本研究使用经过训练的大鼠,让它们在双选药物辨别任务中辨别 30.0 毫克/千克或 300.0 毫克/千克剂量的加巴喷丁与药物。两种剂量的加巴喷丁都被确定为辨别刺激,与 30.0 毫克/千克剂量相比,300.0 毫克/千克剂量的加巴喷丁更容易被确定。训练药物和加巴喷丁类化合物普瑞巴林可完全替代(> 80% 加巴喷丁-杠杆反应)。阿片类化合物吗啡和芬太尼显示出部分替代(> 20% 的加巴喷丁-杠杆反应),阿片受体拮抗剂纳曲酮与加巴喷丁训练剂量的剂量组合将加巴喷丁-杠杆反应的百分比降至 80% 以下。大麻素Δ⁹-四氢大麻酚可部分替代两种训练剂量的加巴喷丁。巴比妥化合物戊巴比妥和苯并二氮杂卓化合物地西泮只对 300.0 毫克/千克剂量的加巴喷丁进行了替代测试,这些化合物产生了完全替代。这些研究结果表明,加巴喷丁能建立一个强大的分辨线索,其刺激效果与普瑞巴林、戊巴比妥和地西泮非常相似。由于普瑞巴林、戊巴比妥和地西泮有使用问题药物的风险,并被列为管制药物,因此有必要进一步评估加巴喷丁在这方面的风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Discriminative stimulus properties of two training doses of gabapentin in rats: Substitution by pregabalin, diazepam, and pentobarbital.","authors":"Adam J Prus, Madeline T Van Fossen, Alexandria N Iannucci, Alexia G Dalton, Joshua N Prete","doi":"10.1037/pha0000704","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000704","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gabapentin is used for the treatment of many conditions, including seizures, pain, and anxiety. Increasing reports of nonprescribed use suggest that gabapentin may elicit positive subjective effects. The present study was conducted to examine the subjective effects of gabapentin using rats trained to discriminate either a 30.0 mg/kg or 300.0 mg/kg dose of gabapentin versus vehicle on a two-choice drug discrimination task. Both doses of gabapentin were established as discriminative stimuli, and the 300.0 mg/kg dose was more readily established compared to the 30.0 mg/kg dose. Full substitution (> 80% gabapentin-lever responding) occurred by the training drug and by the gabapentinoid compound pregabalin. Partial substitution (> 20% gabapentin-lever responding) was shown by the opioid compounds morphine and fentanyl, and dose combinations of the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone with the gabapentin training doses reduced the percentage of gabapentin-lever responding to below 80%. Partial substitution for both training doses of gabapentin occurred with the cannabinoid Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol. The barbiturate compound pentobarbital and the benzodiazepine compound diazepam were only tested for substitution for the 300.0 mg/kg dose of gabapentin and these compounds produced full substitution. These findings demonstrate that gabapentin establishes a robust discriminative cue and exhibits stimulus effects closely similar to pregabalin, pentobarbital, and diazepam. Since pregabalin, pentobarbital, and diazepam carry a risk of problematic use and are classified as controlled substances, further evaluations of gabapentin's risks in this regard are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139485351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial evidence of the acute effect of electronic nicotine delivery system use on energy intake. 使用电子尼古丁输送系统对能量摄入产生急性影响的初步证据。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000710
Gabrielle T Maldonado, Christoph Höchsmann, Akansha Anbil, Karissa Neubig, Rabia Imran, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Thokozeni Lipato, Vineela Rachagiri, Andrew J Barnes, Corby K Martin, Caroline O Cobb

Previous work has aimed to disentangle the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on appetite with mixed findings. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have yet to be examined in this regard despite evidence of use for weight control. The present study tested the influence of an ENDS on acute energy intake and associated subjective effects. Participants (n = 34; 18-65 years) with current ENDS use completed two randomly ordered clinical lab sessions after overnight abstinence from tobacco/nicotine/food/drinks (other than water). Sessions differed by the product administered over 20 min: active (20 puffs of a JUUL ENDS device; 5% nicotine tobacco-flavored pod) or control (access to an uncharged JUUL with an empty pod). About 40 min after product administration, participants were provided an ad lib buffet-style meal with 21 food/drink items. Subjective ratings were assessed at baseline, after product use, and before/after the meal. Energy intake (kcal) was calculated using pre-post buffet item weights. Repeated measures analyses of variance and pairwise comparisons were used to detect differences by condition and time (α < .05). Mean ± standard error of the mean energy intake did not differ significantly between active (1011.9 ± 98.8 kcal) and control (939.8 ± 88.4 kcal; p = .108) conditions. Nicotine abstinence symptoms significantly decreased after the active condition, while satiety significantly increased. Following the control condition, satiety remained constant while hunger significantly increased relative to baseline. Findings indicate that acute ENDS use did not significantly impact energy intake, but there was an ENDS-associated subjective increase in satiety and relative decrease in hunger. Results support further investigation of ENDS on appetite. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

以往的研究旨在厘清尼古丁和吸烟对食欲的急性影响,结果不一。尽管有证据表明电子尼古丁给药系统(ENDS)可用于控制体重,但尚未在这方面进行研究。本研究测试了ENDS对急性能量摄入的影响以及相关的主观效应。目前使用ENDS的参与者(n = 34;18-65 岁)在一夜禁烟/禁酒/禁食/禁饮(水除外)后完成了两次随机排序的临床实验。在 20 分钟内使用的产品不同:主动型(使用 JUUL ENDS 装置吸 20 口;5% 尼古丁烟草味 pod)或对照型(使用未充电的 JUUL 和空 pod)。在服用产品约 40 分钟后,参与者可随意享用自助餐,其中包括 21 种食物/饮料。分别在基线、使用产品后以及餐前/餐后进行主观评分。能量摄入量(千卡)根据用餐前/后自助餐项目的权重进行计算。采用重复测量方差分析和配对比较来检测不同条件和时间的差异(α < .05)。能量摄入的平均值(标准误差)在活动状态(1011.9 ± 98.8 千卡)和控制状态(939.8 ± 88.4 千卡;p = .108)之间没有显著差异。在积极状态下,尼古丁戒断症状明显减轻,而饱腹感则明显增加。在对照组条件下,饱腹感保持不变,而饥饿感相对于基线则明显增加。研究结果表明,急性使用ENDS不会对能量摄入产生显著影响,但ENDS相关的饱腹感会主观增加,而饥饿感会相对减少。研究结果支持进一步调查ENDS对食欲的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Initial evidence of the acute effect of electronic nicotine delivery system use on energy intake.","authors":"Gabrielle T Maldonado, Christoph Höchsmann, Akansha Anbil, Karissa Neubig, Rabia Imran, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Thokozeni Lipato, Vineela Rachagiri, Andrew J Barnes, Corby K Martin, Caroline O Cobb","doi":"10.1037/pha0000710","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous work has aimed to disentangle the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on appetite with mixed findings. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have yet to be examined in this regard despite evidence of use for weight control. The present study tested the influence of an ENDS on acute energy intake and associated subjective effects. Participants (<i>n</i> = 34; 18-65 years) with current ENDS use completed two randomly ordered clinical lab sessions after overnight abstinence from tobacco/nicotine/food/drinks (other than water). Sessions differed by the product administered over 20 min: active (20 puffs of a JUUL ENDS device; 5% nicotine tobacco-flavored pod) or control (access to an uncharged JUUL with an empty pod). About 40 min after product administration, participants were provided an ad lib buffet-style meal with 21 food/drink items. Subjective ratings were assessed at baseline, after product use, and before/after the meal. Energy intake (kcal) was calculated using pre-post buffet item weights. Repeated measures analyses of variance and pairwise comparisons were used to detect differences by condition and time (α < .05). Mean ± standard error of the mean energy intake did not differ significantly between active (1011.9 ± 98.8 kcal) and control (939.8 ± 88.4 kcal; <i>p</i> = .108) conditions. Nicotine abstinence symptoms significantly decreased after the active condition, while satiety significantly increased. Following the control condition, satiety remained constant while hunger significantly increased relative to baseline. Findings indicate that acute ENDS use did not significantly impact energy intake, but there was an ENDS-associated subjective increase in satiety and relative decrease in hunger. Results support further investigation of ENDS on appetite. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139734840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cannabis use and binge eating: Examining the relationship between cannabis use and clinical severity among adults with binge eating. 吸食大麻与暴食:研究暴食成人中大麻使用与临床严重程度之间的关系。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000706
Megan L Wilkinson, Claire Trainor, Elizabeth Lampe, Emily K Presseller, Adrienne Juarascio

Cannabis use is prevalent among individuals with binge eating (BE; i.e., the inability to control eating behavior). Yet, only two studies to date (both over 20 years old) have tested if cannabis use relates to clinical severity among BE samples. Characterizing the relationship between cannabis use, eating disorder (ED) severity, and other psychiatric symptoms in BE samples is necessary for informing screening and clinical recommendations. The present study characterized cannabis use among adults with BE and tested between-group and within-group relationships between cannabis use and eating disorder symptoms, alcohol consumption and symptoms, and depression symptoms. Participants (N = 165) were treatment-seeking adults with at least once weekly BE in the past 3 months who completed clinical interviews and self-report measures before treatment. Over 23% of participants reported cannabis use in the past 3 months, with most persons using cannabis reported using "once or twice" or "monthly." Most persons using cannabis reported cannabis-related symptoms. Persons using cannabis reported significantly greater alcohol consumption and were more likely to report alcohol-related symptoms compared to persons not using cannabis. No associations were observed between cannabis use, eating disorder symptoms, and depressions symptoms. These findings indicate that a notable subset of patients with BE use cannabis and experience cannabis-related problems, and that cannabis and alcohol use may be related for these individuals. Considering legal and sociocultural shifts in cannabis availability and prevalence, results from the present study support screening for cannabis and alcohol use patterns in patients with BE. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在暴饮暴食(即无法控制进食行为)患者中,吸食大麻的现象非常普遍。然而,迄今为止只有两项研究(均已超过 20 年)测试了大麻使用是否与暴食症样本的临床严重程度有关。描述 BE 样本中大麻使用、进食障碍(ED)严重程度和其他精神症状之间的关系对于提供筛查和临床建议非常必要。本研究描述了成年 BE 患者使用大麻的情况,并测试了使用大麻与进食障碍症状、饮酒量和症状以及抑郁症状之间的组间关系和组内关系。参与者(N = 165)均为寻求治疗的成年人,他们在过去 3 个月中至少每周进行一次 BE 治疗,并在治疗前完成了临床访谈和自我报告测量。超过 23% 的参与者报告在过去 3 个月中吸食过大麻,大多数吸食者报告 "吸食过一两次 "或 "每月吸食一次"。大多数吸食大麻者报告了与大麻有关的症状。与不使用大麻的人相比,使用大麻的人报告的酒精消耗量要大得多,并且更有可能报告与酒精有关的症状。在使用大麻、饮食失调症状和抑郁症状之间没有观察到任何关联。这些研究结果表明,有相当一部分 BE 患者使用大麻并出现与大麻相关的问题,这些人使用大麻和饮酒可能有关。考虑到大麻供应和流行方面的法律和社会文化变化,本研究的结果支持对 BE 患者的大麻和酒精使用模式进行筛查。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Cannabis use and binge eating: Examining the relationship between cannabis use and clinical severity among adults with binge eating.","authors":"Megan L Wilkinson, Claire Trainor, Elizabeth Lampe, Emily K Presseller, Adrienne Juarascio","doi":"10.1037/pha0000706","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis use is prevalent among individuals with binge eating (BE; i.e., the inability to control eating behavior). Yet, only two studies to date (both over 20 years old) have tested if cannabis use relates to clinical severity among BE samples. Characterizing the relationship between cannabis use, eating disorder (ED) severity, and other psychiatric symptoms in BE samples is necessary for informing screening and clinical recommendations. The present study characterized cannabis use among adults with BE and tested between-group and within-group relationships between cannabis use and eating disorder symptoms, alcohol consumption and symptoms, and depression symptoms. Participants (<i>N</i> = 165) were treatment-seeking adults with at least once weekly BE in the past 3 months who completed clinical interviews and self-report measures before treatment. Over 23% of participants reported cannabis use in the past 3 months, with most persons using cannabis reported using \"once or twice\" or \"monthly.\" Most persons using cannabis reported cannabis-related symptoms. Persons using cannabis reported significantly greater alcohol consumption and were more likely to report alcohol-related symptoms compared to persons not using cannabis. No associations were observed between cannabis use, eating disorder symptoms, and depressions symptoms. These findings indicate that a notable subset of patients with BE use cannabis and experience cannabis-related problems, and that cannabis and alcohol use may be related for these individuals. Considering legal and sociocultural shifts in cannabis availability and prevalence, results from the present study support screening for cannabis and alcohol use patterns in patients with BE. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139485342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A preliminary investigation of the simultaneous effects of cannabidiol and caffeine. 大麻二酚和咖啡因同时作用的初步研究。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000691
Morgan L Ferretti, Noah D Gustin, Caroline M Sokol, C Austin Zamarripa, Matthew T Feldner, Marcel O Bonn-Miller, Jessica G Irons

Caffeine and cannabidiol (CBD) are commonly consumed by the general population, particularly among young adults; however, there is little research on the simultaneous effects of caffeine and CBD. The present study aimed to examine the simultaneous self-reported effects of caffeine and CBD in young healthy adults. Participants (N = 54) who reported daily caffeine use (> 200 mg) attended one experimental session via Zoom and were assigned randomly to receive caffeine (200 mg) combined with either a placebo or CBD (25, 50, 80, 160, or 240 mg). Participants completed subjective drug effects measures at baseline and then ingested caffeine and their assigned CBD dose. Throughout the 140-min session, participants completed self-report measures. The primary outcomes of this study were measures of general drug effects and anxiety. After caffeine and CBD administration, few effects were observed in self-reported measures of general drug effects. No negative effects emerged as a result of combined caffeine and CBD administration. These results should be interpreted cautiously given the preliminary nature and variability in outcomes. The present study findings suggest that combinations of the tested doses of caffeine and CBD do not alter subjective drug effects; further, no negative effects emerged, providing preliminary safety evidence for using these products simultaneously. Further research is needed to examine the simultaneous and/or interactive nature of caffeine and CBD on other caffeine-induced outcomes (e.g., cognition and physiological effects) and will be critical for informing future regulatory decisions regarding caffeine: CBD mixtures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

咖啡因和大麻二酚(CBD)通常被普通人群消费,尤其是年轻人;然而,关于咖啡因和CBD同时作用的研究很少。本研究旨在检验咖啡因和CBD在年轻健康成年人中同时自我报告的影响。报告每日咖啡因使用量(>200 mg)的参与者(N=54)通过Zoom参加了一次实验,并被随机分配接受咖啡因(200 mg)与安慰剂或CBD(25、50、80、160或240 mg)的联合治疗。参与者在基线时完成了主观药物效果测量,然后摄入咖啡因和他们指定的CBD剂量。在140分钟的课程中,参与者完成了自我报告测量。这项研究的主要结果是对一般药物效果和焦虑的测量。在服用咖啡因和CBD后,在自我报告的一般药物效果测量中几乎没有观察到效果。咖啡因和CBD联合给药没有产生任何负面影响。鉴于结果的初步性质和可变性,应谨慎解释这些结果。目前的研究结果表明,测试剂量的咖啡因和CBD的组合不会改变主观药物效果;此外,没有出现负面影响,为同时使用这些产品提供了初步的安全证据。需要进一步的研究来检验咖啡因和CBD对其他咖啡因诱导结果(如认知和生理影响)的同时和/或相互作用性质,这对于为未来关于咖啡因:CBD混合物的监管决策提供信息至关重要。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A preliminary investigation of the simultaneous effects of cannabidiol and caffeine.","authors":"Morgan L Ferretti, Noah D Gustin, Caroline M Sokol, C Austin Zamarripa, Matthew T Feldner, Marcel O Bonn-Miller, Jessica G Irons","doi":"10.1037/pha0000691","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caffeine and cannabidiol (CBD) are commonly consumed by the general population, particularly among young adults; however, there is little research on the simultaneous effects of caffeine and CBD. The present study aimed to examine the simultaneous self-reported effects of caffeine and CBD in young healthy adults. Participants (<i>N</i> = 54) who reported daily caffeine use (> 200 mg) attended one experimental session via Zoom and were assigned randomly to receive caffeine (200 mg) combined with either a placebo or CBD (25, 50, 80, 160, or 240 mg). Participants completed subjective drug effects measures at baseline and then ingested caffeine and their assigned CBD dose. Throughout the 140-min session, participants completed self-report measures. The primary outcomes of this study were measures of general drug effects and anxiety. After caffeine and CBD administration, few effects were observed in self-reported measures of general drug effects. No negative effects emerged as a result of combined caffeine and CBD administration. These results should be interpreted cautiously given the preliminary nature and variability in outcomes. The present study findings suggest that combinations of the tested doses of caffeine and CBD do not alter subjective drug effects; further, no negative effects emerged, providing preliminary safety evidence for using these products simultaneously. Further research is needed to examine the simultaneous and/or interactive nature of caffeine and CBD on other caffeine-induced outcomes (e.g., cognition and physiological effects) and will be critical for informing future regulatory decisions regarding caffeine: CBD mixtures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71421985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adaptation of commodity purchase tasks to identify substitutable substance-free alternative activities for alcohol use. 调整商品购买任务,以确定可替代酒精使用的无物质替代活动。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000697
Sarah C Weinsztok, Derek D Reed, Brandon P Miller, Michael Amlung

Behavioral economic frameworks emphasize the importance of contextual influences on alcohol use; therefore, identifying relative demand for alcohol versus other commodities is of importance. Cross-commodity purchase tasks allow participants to make choices across multiple concurrently available commodities and can thereby pinpoint interactions among those commodities. These tasks may help identify relevant substance-free alternative activities to target in alcohol treatment by determining whether the activity functions as a substitute for alcohol use. While substance-free activity promotion is a promising behavioral component of alcohol interventions, no research to-date has used behavioral economic methods to assess the substitutability of alternative activities for alcohol use. The present studies were preliminary assessments of novel single- and cross-commodity purchase tasks of various alternative activities (e.g., exercise, hobbies, civic involvement). Participants in Study 1 recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (n = 110) were administered a series of novel activity purchase tasks and an alcohol purchase task. Results showed excellent fit of the exponential demand equation to activity purchase task data and provided initial support for adaptation of purchase task methodology to alternative activity demand. In Study 2, participants recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (n = 108) were administered both single-commodity and cross-commodity purchase tasks of alcohol and exercise. While most participants demonstrate independent consumption of alcohol and exercise, a subset of participants substituted exercise for alcohol as indicated by quantitative cross-price elasticity indices. These response patterns highlight the importance of individual differences and hold implications for recovery efforts that promote alternative activity engagement and public policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

行为经济学框架强调环境对酒精使用影响的重要性;因此,确定酒精相对于其他商品的相对需求非常重要。跨商品购买任务允许参与者在同时提供的多种商品中做出选择,从而可以确定这些商品之间的相互作用。这些任务可以帮助确定相关的无酒精替代活动,确定这些活动是否可以替代酒精的使用,从而确定酒精治疗的目标。虽然促进无酒精活动是酒精干预中很有前景的行为组成部分,但迄今为止还没有研究使用行为经济学方法来评估替代活动对酒精使用的可替代性。本研究是对各种替代活动(如锻炼、爱好、公民参与)的新型单一和跨商品购买任务的初步评估。研究 1 的参与者来自亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk(n = 110),他们接受了一系列新颖的活动购买任务和酒精购买任务。结果表明,指数需求方程与活动购买任务数据的拟合度非常高,并为购买任务方法适应其他活动需求提供了初步支持。在研究 2 中,从亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 中招募的参与者(n = 108)接受了酒精和运动的单一商品和跨商品购买任务。虽然大多数参与者表现出酒精和运动的独立消费,但根据定量交叉价格弹性指数,一部分参与者用运动替代了酒精。这些反应模式凸显了个体差异的重要性,并对促进替代活动参与的康复工作和公共政策产生了影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Adaptation of commodity purchase tasks to identify substitutable substance-free alternative activities for alcohol use.","authors":"Sarah C Weinsztok, Derek D Reed, Brandon P Miller, Michael Amlung","doi":"10.1037/pha0000697","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pha0000697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral economic frameworks emphasize the importance of contextual influences on alcohol use; therefore, identifying relative demand for alcohol versus other commodities is of importance. Cross-commodity purchase tasks allow participants to make choices across multiple concurrently available commodities and can thereby pinpoint interactions among those commodities. These tasks may help identify relevant substance-free alternative activities to target in alcohol treatment by determining whether the activity functions as a substitute for alcohol use. While substance-free activity promotion is a promising behavioral component of alcohol interventions, no research to-date has used behavioral economic methods to assess the substitutability of alternative activities for alcohol use. The present studies were preliminary assessments of novel single- and cross-commodity purchase tasks of various alternative activities (e.g., exercise, hobbies, civic involvement). Participants in Study 1 recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (<i>n</i> = 110) were administered a series of novel activity purchase tasks and an alcohol purchase task. Results showed excellent fit of the exponential demand equation to activity purchase task data and provided initial support for adaptation of purchase task methodology to alternative activity demand. In Study 2, participants recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (<i>n</i> = 108) were administered both single-commodity and cross-commodity purchase tasks of alcohol and exercise. While most participants demonstrate independent consumption of alcohol and exercise, a subset of participants substituted exercise for alcohol as indicated by quantitative cross-price elasticity indices. These response patterns highlight the importance of individual differences and hold implications for recovery efforts that promote alternative activity engagement and public policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138828982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using eye tracking to evaluate the impact of smartphone-delivered attentional bias modification training for smokers. 利用眼动跟踪评估智能手机提供的注意力偏差修正训练对吸烟者的影响。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000729
Jason D Robinson, Yong Cui, Jeffrey M Engelmann, George Kypriotakis, Paul M Cinciripini

Attentional bias modification (ABM) has been proposed to treat tobacco use disorder by reducing attentional bias (AB) to smoking-related cues. We sought to determine the extent to which AB to smoking cues, as measured by eye-tracking technology, was sensitive to multisession ABM among treatment-seeking adult smokers. The participants (N = 203; 74 women) completed 13 days of daily ABM or sham training using a smartphone, followed by 8 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy and cessation counseling. ABM and sham training were administered using the modified dot-probe task (i.e., neutral cues probed 100% of the time) and the unmodified dot-probe task (i.e., cue types probed equally), respectively. Eye gaze dwell time proportions to paired presentations of smoking and neutral cues were measured at baseline, 1 day post-ABM training, and 8 weeks post-ABM training. At baseline, younger, more dependent smokers and those with higher smoking satisfaction scores looked longer at smoking cues than neutral ones. ABM training resulted in greater gaze preference for the smoking cues than sham training at 1 day posttraining. Gaze preference for smoking cues was positively associated with AB to smoking cues as measured by reaction time during the laboratory dot-probe assessment. At 8 weeks posttraining, gaze preference was not associated with any of the smoking outcome measures. These findings suggest that multisession ABM training resulted in changes in AB by increasing time spent looking at neutral compared with smoking cues in the short term. However, this effect was not sustained and was not associated with smoking behavior outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

注意偏差修正(ABM)被认为可以通过减少对吸烟相关线索的注意偏差(AB)来治疗烟草使用障碍。我们试图确定通过眼动跟踪技术测量的吸烟线索注意偏差对寻求治疗的成年吸烟者中的多疗程 ABM 的敏感程度。参与者(N = 203;74 名女性)使用智能手机完成了为期 13 天的每日 ABM 或假训练,随后接受了为期 8 周的尼古丁替代疗法和戒烟咨询。ABM和假训练分别使用改良的点探测任务(即100%的时间探测中性线索)和未改良的点探测任务(即同样探测线索类型)进行。分别在基线、ABM 训练后 1 天和 ABM 训练后 8 周测量了吸烟和中性线索配对呈现时的眼球注视停留时间比例。基线时,较年轻、依赖性较强的吸烟者和吸烟满意度得分较高的吸烟者注视吸烟线索的时间比注视中性线索的时间长。与假训练相比,在训练后 1 天,ABM 训练使吸烟者对吸烟提示的注视时间更长。对吸烟提示的注视偏好与吸烟提示的AB呈正相关,AB是通过实验室点探测评估中的反应时间来衡量的。在训练后 8 周,注视偏好与任何吸烟结果测量均无关联。这些研究结果表明,与吸烟线索相比,多期 ABM 训练在短期内增加了注视中性线索的时间,从而导致 AB 发生变化。然而,这种效果并不持久,也与吸烟行为结果无关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Using eye tracking to evaluate the impact of smartphone-delivered attentional bias modification training for smokers.","authors":"Jason D Robinson, Yong Cui, Jeffrey M Engelmann, George Kypriotakis, Paul M Cinciripini","doi":"10.1037/pha0000729","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000729","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attentional bias modification (ABM) has been proposed to treat tobacco use disorder by reducing attentional bias (AB) to smoking-related cues. We sought to determine the extent to which AB to smoking cues, as measured by eye-tracking technology, was sensitive to multisession ABM among treatment-seeking adult smokers. The participants (<i>N</i> = 203; 74 women) completed 13 days of daily ABM or sham training using a smartphone, followed by 8 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy and cessation counseling. ABM and sham training were administered using the modified dot-probe task (i.e., neutral cues probed 100% of the time) and the unmodified dot-probe task (i.e., cue types probed equally), respectively. Eye gaze dwell time proportions to paired presentations of smoking and neutral cues were measured at baseline, 1 day post-ABM training, and 8 weeks post-ABM training. At baseline, younger, more dependent smokers and those with higher smoking satisfaction scores looked longer at smoking cues than neutral ones. ABM training resulted in greater gaze preference for the smoking cues than sham training at 1 day posttraining. Gaze preference for smoking cues was positively associated with AB to smoking cues as measured by reaction time during the laboratory dot-probe assessment. At 8 weeks posttraining, gaze preference was not associated with any of the smoking outcome measures. These findings suggest that multisession ABM training resulted in changes in AB by increasing time spent looking at neutral compared with smoking cues in the short term. However, this effect was not sustained and was not associated with smoking behavior outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141456113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1