Understanding settlement patterns and their spatial distribution is essential for various fields, including geography, demography, and sociology. This paper explores a novel approach to assess the distance between settlement patterns of two populations with a specific focus on territorial variation inequalities. Building upon the conceptual framework of the Lorenz curve, we introduce new indices and graphical representations that permit us to emphasize territorial differences in settlement between two populations. By emphasizing the distance between settlement patterns, this methodology captures variations and inequalities in territorial distribution. Rather than simply characterizing settlement patterns as concentrated or dispersed, this approach considers the extent to which populations are spatially separated or integrated. To test this new approach, three foreign reference communities were examined (Egyptians, Chinese, and Romanians) known in the literature for their markedly different settlement patterns in Italy. We identified three different patterns for these populations that highlight the importance of considering local variations and spatial interactions in the study of settlement patterns. The results obtained seem to agree with the theory of settlements of foreign populations in Italy, albeit with additional geographical information. Through this research, we aim to provide a new methodology for measuring the distance between the settlement patterns of two different populations, filling some gaps in traditional methods.
{"title":"A Novel Approach to Assess the Distance Between the Settlement Patterns of Two Populations","authors":"Massimo Mucciardi","doi":"10.1111/gean.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding settlement patterns and their spatial distribution is essential for various fields, including geography, demography, and sociology. This paper explores a novel approach to assess the distance between settlement patterns of two populations with a specific focus on territorial variation inequalities. Building upon the conceptual framework of the Lorenz curve, we introduce new indices and graphical representations that permit us to emphasize territorial differences in settlement between two populations. By emphasizing the distance between settlement patterns, this methodology captures variations and inequalities in territorial distribution. Rather than simply characterizing settlement patterns as concentrated or dispersed, this approach considers the extent to which populations are spatially separated or integrated. To test this new approach, three foreign reference communities were examined (Egyptians, Chinese, and Romanians) known in the literature for their markedly different settlement patterns in Italy. We identified three different patterns for these populations that highlight the importance of considering local variations and spatial interactions in the study of settlement patterns. The results obtained seem to agree with the theory of settlements of foreign populations in Italy, albeit with additional geographical information. Through this research, we aim to provide a new methodology for measuring the distance between the settlement patterns of two different populations, filling some gaps in traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"57 3","pages":"389-401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.70002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144647558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robbery and break-and-enter (BE) crimes require investigations into how these contrasting crimes co-occur. Utilizing robbery and BE data from the City of Toronto in Canada, this study analyzed the mean and area-specific crime trends, their risk factors, and the shared and crime-specific risk and hotspot areas. Results suggest an increase in robbery (0.23, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.17–0.29) and BE (0.08, 95% CI: 0.04–0.12) crimes during 2021–2022, revealing the most prominent area-specific trends in northwest and northeastern Toronto. The findings suggest that spatially lagged variables can offer deeper insights into complex spatial interactions of real-life factors that influence crime. Robberies were positively associated with the household and dwellings indicator (2021 Ontario Marginalization Index) but not its spatial lag, while BE crimes had no direct association with it but showed a positive association with its spatial lag. Neighborhoods in northwestern, northeastern, and southcentral parts of Toronto were hotspots of robberies, while southcentral and northwestern parts were at elevated risk due to BE. The findings demonstrate the complexities associated with the co-occurrence of multiple crime types and highlight the need for more unified and integrated theories to contextualize neighborhood effects of crime determinants and their impact on crimes.
{"title":"Comparisons Between Robbery and Break-And-Enter: Area-Specific Trends, Socioeconomic Risk Factors, and Hotspots Analysis Using a Bayesian Spatial and Spatiotemporal Approach","authors":"Jane Law, Abu Yousuf Md Abdullah","doi":"10.1111/gean.12421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12421","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Robbery and break-and-enter (BE) crimes require investigations into how these contrasting crimes co-occur. Utilizing robbery and BE data from the City of Toronto in Canada, this study analyzed the mean and area-specific crime trends, their risk factors, and the shared and crime-specific risk and hotspot areas. Results suggest an increase in robbery (0.23, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.17–0.29) and BE (0.08, 95% CI: 0.04–0.12) crimes during 2021–2022, revealing the most prominent area-specific trends in northwest and northeastern Toronto. The findings suggest that spatially lagged variables can offer deeper insights into complex spatial interactions of real-life factors that influence crime. Robberies were positively associated with the household and dwellings indicator (2021 Ontario Marginalization Index) but not its spatial lag, while BE crimes had no direct association with it but showed a positive association with its spatial lag. Neighborhoods in northwestern, northeastern, and southcentral parts of Toronto were hotspots of robberies, while southcentral and northwestern parts were at elevated risk due to BE. The findings demonstrate the complexities associated with the co-occurrence of multiple crime types and highlight the need for more unified and integrated theories to contextualize neighborhood effects of crime determinants and their impact on crimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"57 3","pages":"463-477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.12421","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144646886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}