Hearing Research最新文献

Objectives

Design

Results

Conclusion

Cochlear tuning and hence auditory frequency selectivity are thought to change in noisy environments by activation of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR). In humans, auditory frequency selectivity is often assessed using psychoacoustical tuning curves (PTCs), a plot of the level required for pure-tone maskers to just mask a fixed-level pure-tone probe as a function of masker frequency. Sometimes, however, the stimuli used to measure a PTC are long enough that they can activate the MOCR by themselves and thus affect the PTC. Here, PTCs for probe frequencies of 500 Hz and 4 kHz were measured in forward masking using short maskers (30 ms) and probes (10 ms) to minimize the activation of the MOCR by the maskers or the probes. PTCs were also measured in the presence of long (300 ms) ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise precursors to investigate the effect of the ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR on PTC tuning. Four listeners with normal hearing participated in the experiments. At 500 Hz, ipsilateral and bilateral precursors sharpened the PTCs by decreasing the thresholds for maskers with frequencies at or near the probe frequency with minimal effects on thresholds for maskers remote in frequency from the probe. At 4 kHz, by contrast, ipsilateral and bilateral precursors barely affected thresholds for maskers near the probe frequency but broadened PTCs by reducing thresholds for maskers far from the probe. Contralateral precursors barely affected PTCs. An existing computational model was used to interpret the results. The model suggested that despite the apparent differences, the pattern of results is consistent with the ipsilateral and bilateral MOCR inhibiting the cochlear gain similarly at the two probe frequencies and more strongly than the contralateral MOCR.

It has long been known that environmental conditions, particularly during development, affect morphological and functional properties of the brain including sensory systems; manipulating the environment thus represents a viable way to explore experience-dependent plasticity of the brain as well as of sensory systems. In this review, we summarize our experience with the effects of acoustically enriched environment (AEE) consisting of spectrally and temporally modulated complex sounds applied during first weeks of the postnatal development in rats and compare it with the related knowledge from the literature. Compared to controls, rats exposed to AEE showed in neurons of several parts of the auditory system differences in the dendritic length and in number of spines and spine density. The AEE exposure permanently influenced neuronal representation of the sound frequency and intensity resulting in lower excitatory thresholds, increased frequency selectivity and steeper rate-intensity functions. These changes were present both in the neurons of the inferior colliculus and the auditory cortex (AC). In addition, the AEE changed the responsiveness of AC neurons to frequency modulated, and also to a lesser extent, amplitude-modulated stimuli. Rearing rat pups in AEE leads to an increased reliability of acoustical responses of AC neurons, affecting both the rate and the temporal codes. At the level of individual spikes, the discharge patterns of individual neurons show a higher degree of similarity across stimulus repetitions. Behaviorally, rearing pups in AEE resulted in an improvement in the frequency resolution and gap detection ability under conditions with a worsened stimulus clarity. Altogether, the results of experiments show that the exposure to AEE during the critical developmental period influences the frequency and temporal processing in the auditory system, and these changes persist until adulthood. The results may serve for interpretation of the effects of the application of enriched acoustical environment in human neonatal medicine, especially in the case of care for preterm born children.

The genes Ocm (encoding oncomodulin) and Slc26a5 (encoding prestin) are expressed strongly in outer hair cells and both are involved in deafness in mice. However, it is not clear if they influence the expression of each other. In this study, we characterise the auditory phenotype resulting from two new mouse alleles, Ocm^tm1e and Slc26a5^tm1Cre. Each mutation leads to absence of detectable mRNA transcribed from the mutant allele, but there was no evidence that oncomodulin regulates expression of prestin or vice versa. The two mutants show distinctive patterns of auditory dysfunction. Ocm^tm1e homozygotes have normal auditory brainstem response thresholds at 4 weeks old followed by progressive hearing loss starting at high frequencies, while heterozygotes show largely normal thresholds until 6 months of age, when signs of worse thresholds are detected. In contrast, Slc26a5^tm1Cre homozygotes have stable but raised thresholds across all frequencies tested, 3 to 42 kHz, at least from 4 to 8 weeks old, while heterozygotes have raised thresholds at high frequencies. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics show deficits similar to auditory brainstem responses in both mutants, suggesting that the origin of hearing impairment is in the outer hair cells. Endocochlear potentials are normal in the two mutants. Scanning electron microscopy revealed normal development of hair cells in Ocm^tm1e homozygotes but scattered outer hair cell loss even at 4 weeks old when thresholds appeared normal, indicating that there is not a direct relationship between numbers of outer hair cells present and auditory thresholds.

The middle-ear muscle reflex (MEMR) and medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) modify peripheral auditory function, which may reduce masking and improve speech-in-noise (SIN) recognition. Previous work and our pilot data suggest that the two reflexes respond differently to static versus dynamic noise elicitors. However, little is known about how the two reflexes work in tandem to contribute to SIN recognition. We hypothesized that SIN recognition would be significantly correlated with the strength of the MEMR and with the strength of the MOCR. Additionally, we hypothesized that SIN recognition would be best when both reflexes were activated. A total of 43 healthy, normal-hearing adults met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (35 females, age range: 19–29 years). MEMR strength was assessed using wideband absorbance. MOCR strength was assessed using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. SIN recognition was assessed using a modified version of the QuickSIN. All measurements were made with and without two types of contralateral noise elicitors (steady and pulsed) at two levels (50 and 65 dB SPL). Steady noise was used to primarily elicit the MOCR and pulsed noise was used to elicit both reflexes. Two baseline conditions without a contralateral elicitor were also obtained. Results revealed differences in how the MEMR and MOCR responded to elicitor type and level. Contrary to hypotheses, SIN recognition was not significantly improved in the presence of any contralateral elicitors relative to the baseline conditions. Additionally, there were no significant correlations between MEMR strength and SIN recognition, or between MOCR strength and SIN recognition. MEMR and MOCR strength were significantly correlated for pulsed noise elicitors but not steady noise elicitors. Results suggest no association between SIN recognition and the MEMR or MOCR, at least as measured and analyzed in this study. SIN recognition may have been influenced by factors not accounted for in this study, such as contextual cues, warranting further study.