首页 > 最新文献

ACS Chemical Health & Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Abstract PO2-12-05: Scalp Cooling with the Capelli System to Reduce Doxorubicin-induced Alopecia in Patients with Localized Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial 摘要 PO2-12-05:使用卡佩利系统进行头皮降温以减少局部乳腺癌患者由多柔比星引起的脱发:2期随机对照试验
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-12-05
Carlos Paiva, Fabiola Dias, Angelo Matthes, Bianca Paiva, C. Souza, D. Lacerda, Augusto Antoniazzi, Maria Fernanda Machado, Matheus Godinho, Crislaine de Lima, Cristiane Cárcano, Marina Zorzetto
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is a distressing side effect of breast cancer (BC) treatment. Scalp cooling (SC) devices have shown promise in reducing the severity of CIA. However, the impact of reducing alopecia occurrence on the quality of life of Brazilian patients remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Capelli System, a new SC device, in reducing CIA. Methods: This was a single-center, controlled, randomized phase 2 clinical trial involving women with TNM stage I to III BC undergoing neoadjuvant or adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (AC regimen: doxorubicin 60 mg/m² plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², i.v., q21 days), with or without a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Participants were randomized in a 1:3 ratio into the scalp cooling (n = 33) or control (n = 12) groups. All participants were advised to cut their hair short and avoid heat-inducing tools or processes throughout chemotherapy, using cold or lukewarm water and wide-toothed combs for hair washing. The primary efficacy endpoint was grade 2 alopecia (>50% hair loss or hair shaving due to alopecia) after 4 cycles of AC. Secondary endpoints included measures of hair loss distress (BRHL) and body image (BRBI) from the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23), as well as symptoms of anxiety and depression from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Fitzpatrick phototype and hair type were assessed. Statistical analyses utilized generalized linear models and Fisher's Exact test (p-value < 0.05). Results: Patients were enrolled from October 11, 2019, to January 17, 2022. Out of the 45 patients included, 8 were excluded: 2 due to intolerance, 1 with alopecia associated with COVID-19, and 5 who withdrew consent (2 with grade 2 headache, 3 without justification). The median age was 44.6 (min-max: 23-63) years, with 18 (40%) and 27 (60%) receiving adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Grade 2 alopecia or hair shaving occurred in 52% of scalp cooling patients and 100% of controls (p = 0.003), demonstrating a significant 48% reduction in alopecia. There were no significant differences in HADS-A, HADS-D, BRHL, or BRBI scores between the two groups. Alopecia occurrence did not show significant associations with skin or hair types. No serious adverse events related to the scalp cooling device were reported. Conclusions: SC with the Capelli System significantly reduced CIA by half. Some patients experienced discomfort or headaches and discontinued device use. Further research is needed to understand why reduced alopecia rates do not correlate with improvements in body image or reduced hair loss distress. Citation Format: Carlos Paiva, Fabiola Dias, Angelo Matthes, Bianca Paiva, Cristiano Souza, Domício Lacerda, Augusto Antoniazzi, Maria Fernanda Machado, Matheus Godinho, Crislaine de Lima, Cristiane Cárcano, Marina Zorzetto. Scalp Cooling with the Capelli System to Redu
简介化疗引起的脱发(CIA)是乳腺癌(BC)治疗过程中令人痛苦的副作用。头皮冷却(SC)设备有望减轻化疗引起的脱发的严重程度。然而,减少脱发对巴西患者生活质量的影响仍不清楚。研究目的本研究旨在评估新型头皮冷却设备 Capelli 系统在减轻 CIA 方面的效果。方法:这是一项单中心对照研究:这是一项单中心、对照、随机的二期临床试验,涉及接受以多柔比星为基础的新辅助化疗或辅助化疗(AC 方案:多柔比星 60 毫克/平方米加环磷酰胺 600 毫克/平方米,静脉注射,q21 天)的 TNM I 期至 III 期 BC 女性患者,无论是否使用类固醇类药物(紫杉醇或多西他赛)。参与者按 1:3 的比例随机分为头皮冷却组(33 人)或对照组(12 人)。所有参与者都被建议剪短头发,在整个化疗过程中避免使用发热工具或过程,使用冷水或温水以及宽齿梳子洗头。主要疗效终点是接受 4 个周期 AC 后的 2 级脱发(脱发率大于 50%,或因脱发而剃发)。次要终点包括EORTC生活质量问卷--乳腺癌模块(EORTC QLQ-BR23)中的脱发困扰(BRHL)和身体形象(BRBI)测量指标,以及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)中的焦虑和抑郁症状。还对 Fitzpatrick 光型和毛发类型进行了评估。统计分析采用了广义线性模型和费雪精确检验(p 值小于 0.05)。结果患者入组时间为 2019 年 10 月 11 日至 2022 年 1 月 17 日。在纳入的 45 名患者中,有 8 人被排除在外:2例因不耐受,1例因与COVID-19相关的脱发,5例撤回同意(2例因2级头痛,3例无正当理由)。中位年龄为 44.6 岁(最小-最大:23-63 岁),分别有 18 人(40%)和 27 人(60%)接受了辅助化疗和新辅助化疗。52%的头皮冷却患者和100%的对照组患者出现了2级脱发或剃发(P = 0.003),表明脱发率显著降低了48%。两组患者的 HADS-A、HADS-D、BRHL 或 BRBI 评分无明显差异。脱发的发生与皮肤或毛发类型没有明显关联。没有与头皮冷却装置相关的严重不良事件报告。结论使用卡佩利系统进行头皮冷却后,CIA明显减少了一半。一些患者感到不适或头痛,因此停止了设备的使用。需要进一步研究,以了解为什么脱发率的降低与身体形象的改善或脱发困扰的减少无关。引用格式:Carlos Paiva, Fabiola Dias, Angelo Matthes, Bianca Paiva, Cristiano Souza, Domício Lacerda, Augusto Antoniazzi, Maria Fernanda Machado, Matheus Godinho, Crislaine de Lima, Cristiane Cárcano, Marina Zorzetto.使用卡佩利系统进行头皮冷却以减少局部乳腺癌患者由多柔比星引起的脱发:2期随机对照试验[摘要]。In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-12-05.
{"title":"Abstract PO2-12-05: Scalp Cooling with the Capelli System to Reduce Doxorubicin-induced Alopecia in Patients with Localized Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Carlos Paiva, Fabiola Dias, Angelo Matthes, Bianca Paiva, C. Souza, D. Lacerda, Augusto Antoniazzi, Maria Fernanda Machado, Matheus Godinho, Crislaine de Lima, Cristiane Cárcano, Marina Zorzetto","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-12-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-12-05","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is a distressing side effect of breast cancer (BC) treatment. Scalp cooling (SC) devices have shown promise in reducing the severity of CIA. However, the impact of reducing alopecia occurrence on the quality of life of Brazilian patients remains unclear.\u0000 Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Capelli System, a new SC device, in reducing CIA.\u0000 Methods: This was a single-center, controlled, randomized phase 2 clinical trial involving women with TNM stage I to III BC undergoing neoadjuvant or adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (AC regimen: doxorubicin 60 mg/m² plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², i.v., q21 days), with or without a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Participants were randomized in a 1:3 ratio into the scalp cooling (n = 33) or control (n = 12) groups. All participants were advised to cut their hair short and avoid heat-inducing tools or processes throughout chemotherapy, using cold or lukewarm water and wide-toothed combs for hair washing. The primary efficacy endpoint was grade 2 alopecia (&gt;50% hair loss or hair shaving due to alopecia) after 4 cycles of AC. Secondary endpoints included measures of hair loss distress (BRHL) and body image (BRBI) from the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23), as well as symptoms of anxiety and depression from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Fitzpatrick phototype and hair type were assessed. Statistical analyses utilized generalized linear models and Fisher's Exact test (p-value &lt; 0.05).\u0000 Results: Patients were enrolled from October 11, 2019, to January 17, 2022. Out of the 45 patients included, 8 were excluded: 2 due to intolerance, 1 with alopecia associated with COVID-19, and 5 who withdrew consent (2 with grade 2 headache, 3 without justification). The median age was 44.6 (min-max: 23-63) years, with 18 (40%) and 27 (60%) receiving adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Grade 2 alopecia or hair shaving occurred in 52% of scalp cooling patients and 100% of controls (p = 0.003), demonstrating a significant 48% reduction in alopecia. There were no significant differences in HADS-A, HADS-D, BRHL, or BRBI scores between the two groups. Alopecia occurrence did not show significant associations with skin or hair types. No serious adverse events related to the scalp cooling device were reported.\u0000 Conclusions: SC with the Capelli System significantly reduced CIA by half. Some patients experienced discomfort or headaches and discontinued device use. Further research is needed to understand why reduced alopecia rates do not correlate with improvements in body image or reduced hair loss distress.\u0000 Citation Format: Carlos Paiva, Fabiola Dias, Angelo Matthes, Bianca Paiva, Cristiano Souza, Domício Lacerda, Augusto Antoniazzi, Maria Fernanda Machado, Matheus Godinho, Crislaine de Lima, Cristiane Cárcano, Marina Zorzetto. Scalp Cooling with the Capelli System to Redu","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO5-15-10: Plasticity marker FOXC1 expression accurately predicts efficacy of Adjuvant Tamoxifen + Chemotherapy in reducing all-cause mortality in ER+LN- Breast Cancer: Validation in the SCAN-B Prospective Study (NCT02306096) 摘要 PO5-15-10:可塑性标记物FOXC1的表达能准确预测他莫昔芬+化疗辅助治疗在降低ER+LN-乳腺癌患者全因死亡率方面的疗效:SCAN-B前瞻性研究的验证(NCT02306096)
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-15-10
Partha Ray, Tania Ray, Clive Taylor, R. Hussa
INTRODUCTION: Despite the development and validation of multimarker gene panels like OncotypeDx®, Mammaprint® and EndoPredict®, an affordable and globally accessible biomarker approach that can predict increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer, as well as the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine + chemotherapy in mitigating such elevated risk, continues to be an unmet medical need. Lack of such a pragmatic solution continues to be the cause of preventable recurrent/metastatic disease in patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer in resource-challenged settings around the world. We hypothesized that a predictive biomarker strategy that measures expression of the plasticity marker FOXC1, in combination with clinical parameters like tumor size (TS) and tumor grade (TG), may offer equivalent results to that of the above multimarker gene panels at a significantly lower economic cost without compromising accuracy of prediction results. METHODS: Pre-treatment tumor RNA data obtained from a training cohort (compendium of gene expression microarray datasets, n=2857) and a single large validation cohort (SCAN-B Prospective Multicenter Observational Study, n=3520) for patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer were analyzed for FOXC1 expression, tumor size (TS) and tumor grade (TG) and correlated with Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Optimized biomarker cutoff values based on model area-under-curve were leave-one-out cross validated and Risk-of-Recurrence (ROR) prediction algorithm derived utilizing the (compendium) training dataset. The unmodified strategy was then validated in the independent (SCAN-B) validation dataset. RESULTS: A predetermined High ROR score calculated using FOXC1 expression, TS and TG (trained using the compendium dataset) predicted efficacy of adjuvant endocrine + chemotherapy over that of adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in ER+LN- patients in terms of statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 8-years post-diagnosis in the SCAN-B validation dataset (4.66% vs 24.06%, n=326, OR=6.48, 95%CI [2.97-14.11], p< 0.0001). OncotypeDx® (5.7% vs 14.4%, n=762, OR=2.79, 95%CI [1.37-5.67], p=0.002), Mammaprint® (5.1% vs 18.4%, n=665, OR= 95%CI [2.04-8.43], p< 0.0001) and Endopredict® (4.8% vs 15.2%, n=923, OR=3.58 95%CI [1.78-7.21], p=0.0002) were also statistically significant predictors of the same. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment tumor FOXC1 mRNA or protein expression (assessed using qRT-PCR or routine immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, when combined with TS and TG presents a unique and economical alternative solution to multimarker gene panel tests like OncotypeDx®, Mammaprint® or Endopredict®, for guiding therapy of patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer in resource challenged settings. Such an approach to identify elevated risk of recurrence in patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer and prevent the same by guiding adjuvant endocrine + chemo
导言:尽管 OncotypeDx®、Mammaprint® 和 EndoPredict® 等多标志物基因面板已得到开发和验证,但一种可预测 ER+LN- 乳腺癌患者全因死亡风险升高以及辅助内分泌+化疗在降低这种升高风险方面的疗效的负担得起且全球通用的生物标志物方法仍是一项尚未满足的医疗需求。在世界各地资源匮乏的环境中,由于缺乏这种实用的解决方案,被确诊为ER+LN-乳腺癌的患者仍会出现可预防的复发/转移性疾病。我们假设,将可塑性标记物 FOXC1 的表达与肿瘤大小(TS)和肿瘤分级(TG)等临床参数结合起来测量的预测性生物标记物策略,可以在不影响预测结果准确性的前提下,以更低的经济成本提供与上述多标记物基因面板相当的结果。方法:对从一个训练队列(基因表达微阵列数据集汇编,n=2857)和一个大型验证队列(SCAN-B 前瞻性多中心观察研究,n=3520)中获得的ER+LN-乳腺癌患者治疗前肿瘤RNA数据进行分析,检测FOXC1表达、肿瘤大小(TS)和肿瘤分级(TG),并将其与无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)相关联。根据模型曲线下面积优化生物标志物截断值,并利用(汇编)训练数据集进行一一交叉验证,得出复发风险(ROR)预测算法。然后在独立的(SCAN-B)验证数据集中对未修改的策略进行验证。结果:利用 FOXC1 表达、TS 和 TG 计算出的预设高 ROR 评分(使用汇编数据集进行训练)预测了 ER+LN- 患者辅助内分泌+化疗的疗效,在 SCAN-B 验证数据集中,诊断后 8 年的全因死亡率在统计学上显著降低(4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%,4.66% vs 24.06%)。66% vs 24.06%,n=326,OR=6.48,95%CI [2.97-14.11],p< 0.0001)。OncotypeDx®(5.7% vs 14.4%,n=762,OR=2.79,95%CI [1.37-5.67],p=0.002)、Mammaprint®(5.1% vs 18.4%,n=665,OR= 95%CI [2.04-8.43],p< 0.0001)和 Endopredict®(4.8% vs 15.2%,n=923,OR=3.58 95%CI [1.78-7.21],p=0.0002)也是具有统计学意义的预测因素。结论:治疗前肿瘤 FOXC1 mRNA 或蛋白表达(分别使用 qRT-PCR 或常规免疫组化 (IHC) 评估)与 TS 和 TG 结合使用时,是一种独特而经济的替代方案,可替代 OncotypeDx®、Mammaprint® 或 Endopredict® 等多标志物基因小组检测,为资源有限的环境中确诊为 ER+LN- 乳腺癌的患者提供治疗指导。这种方法可以识别ER+LN-乳腺癌患者的复发风险,并通过指导辅助内分泌+化疗决策来预防复发,有助于延长无复发生存期和总生存期。这种方法值得在资源匮乏的现实环境中对ER+LN-患者队列进行测试,以帮助支持在临床中实施这种FOXC1驱动的预测性生物标志物策略。引用格式:帕尔塔-雷、塔尼亚-雷、克莱夫-泰勒、罗伯特-胡萨可塑性标志物FOXC1表达可准确预测他莫昔芬+化疗辅助治疗对降低ER+LN-乳腺癌全因死亡率的疗效:SCAN-B前瞻性研究(NCT02306096)的验证[摘要]。In:2023年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023年12月5-9日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-15-10.
{"title":"Abstract PO5-15-10: Plasticity marker FOXC1 expression accurately predicts efficacy of Adjuvant Tamoxifen + Chemotherapy in reducing all-cause mortality in ER+LN- Breast Cancer: Validation in the SCAN-B Prospective Study (NCT02306096)","authors":"Partha Ray, Tania Ray, Clive Taylor, R. Hussa","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-15-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-15-10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 INTRODUCTION: Despite the development and validation of multimarker gene panels like OncotypeDx®, Mammaprint® and EndoPredict®, an affordable and globally accessible biomarker approach that can predict increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer, as well as the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine + chemotherapy in mitigating such elevated risk, continues to be an unmet medical need. Lack of such a pragmatic solution continues to be the cause of preventable recurrent/metastatic disease in patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer in resource-challenged settings around the world. We hypothesized that a predictive biomarker strategy that measures expression of the plasticity marker FOXC1, in combination with clinical parameters like tumor size (TS) and tumor grade (TG), may offer equivalent results to that of the above multimarker gene panels at a significantly lower economic cost without compromising accuracy of prediction results.\u0000 METHODS: Pre-treatment tumor RNA data obtained from a training cohort (compendium of gene expression microarray datasets, n=2857) and a single large validation cohort (SCAN-B Prospective Multicenter Observational Study, n=3520) for patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer were analyzed for FOXC1 expression, tumor size (TS) and tumor grade (TG) and correlated with Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Optimized biomarker cutoff values based on model area-under-curve were leave-one-out cross validated and Risk-of-Recurrence (ROR) prediction algorithm derived utilizing the (compendium) training dataset. The unmodified strategy was then validated in the independent (SCAN-B) validation dataset.\u0000 RESULTS: A predetermined High ROR score calculated using FOXC1 expression, TS and TG (trained using the compendium dataset) predicted efficacy of adjuvant endocrine + chemotherapy over that of adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in ER+LN- patients in terms of statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 8-years post-diagnosis in the SCAN-B validation dataset (4.66% vs 24.06%, n=326, OR=6.48, 95%CI [2.97-14.11], p&lt; 0.0001). OncotypeDx® (5.7% vs 14.4%, n=762, OR=2.79, 95%CI [1.37-5.67], p=0.002), Mammaprint® (5.1% vs 18.4%, n=665, OR= 95%CI [2.04-8.43], p&lt; 0.0001) and Endopredict® (4.8% vs 15.2%, n=923, OR=3.58 95%CI [1.78-7.21], p=0.0002) were also statistically significant predictors of the same.\u0000 CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment tumor FOXC1 mRNA or protein expression (assessed using qRT-PCR or routine immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, when combined with TS and TG presents a unique and economical alternative solution to multimarker gene panel tests like OncotypeDx®, Mammaprint® or Endopredict®, for guiding therapy of patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer in resource challenged settings. Such an approach to identify elevated risk of recurrence in patients diagnosed with ER+LN- breast cancer and prevent the same by guiding adjuvant endocrine + chemo","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"47 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO5-20-01: SENTINOT2- Use of superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer to avoid unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsies 摘要 PO5-20-01:SENTINOT2- 使用超顺磁性氧化铁示踪剂避免不必要的前哨淋巴结活检
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-20-01
Mary Bajomo, Ivan Marin, Jessica Montalvan, Margarita Riojas-Barrett, Logan Healy, E. Bonefas, Stacey Carter, Alastair Thompson
Background/Purpose: The use of superparamagnetic nanoparticles of iron oxide tracers (Magtrace) and electromagnetometers (SentiMag) for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) during breast cancer surgery has been demonstrated to be noninferior to traditional radioisotope (RI) and blue dye detection, with additional safety benefits. Previous work has shown that transcutaneous detection of SLN with Magtrace/Sentimag is possible for over 30 days. Because of the safety, efficacy, and long detection window of Magtrace, we aim to investigate the use of Magtrace to prevent unnecessary SLN biopsies (SLNB) in breast cancer surgery. SLNB are commonly performed during breast conserving surgeries (BCS) or mastectomy for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Because metastasis is not expected in patients diagnosed with DCIS, SLNB may be unnecessary and potentially harmful. However, in 15-25% of cases, unexpected invasive carcinoma is found during the post-surgical histopathological analysis of the resected breast tissue. For these cases, if SLNB are forgone during the initial surgery, SLNB during a second (delayed) procedure is the usual standard of care to evaluate SLN for metastasis. However, potential changes to lymphatic drainage following the initial resection may affect tracer localization to SLN. Consequently, we aim to compare SLN detection rates during delayed SLNB with Magtrace administered prior to initial BCS or mastectomy and subsequent RI tracer administered prior to delayed SLNB. Methods: SENTINOT2 is an ongoing international trial with BCM as the sole US site. For eligible patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, Magtrace will be administered prior to BCS or mastectomy. If invasive carcinoma is found from the post-surgical histopathological analysis, patients will receive delayed SLNB within 4 weeks of their initial surgery. Prior to delayed SLNB, patients will be randomized into two groups differing in the order of modality used for SLN detection (Magtrace or RI). Subjects with the following conditions will be excluded from the study: hypersensitivity to Magtrace, iron overload disease, pregnancy, and lactation. The total expected accrual for this study is 538 subjects globally and 50 subjects at BCM. Results: Currently, 19 patients have been enrolled in SENTINOT2. The subject population is 11% Asian, 26% Black/African American, and 47% Caucasian with non-Hispanic ethnicity. 5% of subjects identified as Hispanic Caucasian and 11% of subjects declined to report their race or ethnicity. 79% of patients had mastectomies, while 21% had BCS. After post-surgical histopathological analysis, 21% (4/19) patients were determined to have invasive carcinoma and received delayed SLNB. 50% (2/4) of these patients were randomized to have Magtrace as their first SLN detection modality (Mag-RI) while the other 50% (2/4) had RI as their first SLN detection modality (RI-Mag). Table 1 shows comparable SLN dete
背景/目的:在乳腺癌手术中使用氧化铁超顺磁性纳米粒子示踪剂(Magtrace)和电磁计(SentiMag)检测前哨淋巴结(SLN)的效果已被证明不逊于传统的放射性同位素(RI)和蓝色染料检测,而且还具有额外的安全优势。先前的研究表明,使用 Magtrace/Sentimag 对 SLN 进行经皮检测可持续 30 天以上。鉴于 Magtrace 的安全性、有效性和较长的检测时间,我们希望研究如何使用 Magtrace 来防止乳腺癌手术中不必要的 SLN 活检(SLNB)。SLNB通常在保乳手术(BCS)或乳房切除术中对术前诊断为原位导管癌(DCIS)的患者进行。由于被诊断为 DCIS 的患者不会发生转移,因此 SLNB 可能是不必要的,而且可能有害。然而,在手术后对切除的乳腺组织进行组织病理学分析时,有 15-25% 的病例会发现意想不到的浸润性癌。对于这些病例,如果在初次手术中放弃了 SLNB,那么在第二次(延迟)手术中进行 SLNB 是评估 SLN 是否转移的常规标准。然而,初次切除术后淋巴引流的潜在变化可能会影响 SLN 的示踪定位。因此,我们旨在比较延迟 SLNB 期间的 SLN 检测率,即首次 BCS 或乳房切除术前使用 Magtrace 和延迟 SLNB 前使用 RI 示踪剂。方法:SENTINOT2 是一项正在进行的国际试验,BCM 是唯一的美国试验点。对于术前诊断为 DCIS 的合格患者,将在 BCS 或乳房切除术前进行 Magtrace 检测。如果术后组织病理分析发现浸润性癌,患者将在首次手术后 4 周内接受延迟 SLNB。在进行延迟 SLNB 之前,患者将被随机分为两组,两组的 SLN 检测方式(Magtrace 或 RI)顺序不同。患有以下疾病的受试者将被排除在研究之外:对 Magtrace 过敏、铁超载疾病、妊娠和哺乳期。本研究预计在全球范围内招募 538 名受试者,在北京中医药大学招募 50 名受试者。研究结果目前,SENTINOT2 共招募了 19 名患者。受试者中11%为亚洲人,26%为黑人/非洲裔美国人,47%为非西班牙裔高加索人。5%的受试者被认定为西班牙裔高加索人,11%的受试者拒绝报告自己的种族或族裔。79%的患者接受了乳房切除术,21%的患者接受了乳房肿块切除术。手术后组织病理学分析显示,21%(4/19)的患者被确定为浸润性癌,并接受了延迟 SLNB 治疗。在这些患者中,50%(2/4)的患者被随机安排使用 Magtrace 作为其第一种 SLN 检测方式(Mag-RI),而另外 50%(2/4)的患者则使用 RI 作为其第一种 SLN 检测方式(RI-Mag)。表 1 显示,在接受延迟 SLNB 的患者中,Magtrace 和 RI 的 SLN 检测率相当。只有 1/4 的患者出现了 SLN 转移。对于这名患者,两种方式都成功检测到了阳性 SLN。结论:Magtrace 显示了延迟 SLN 检测的潜力,Magtrace 的使用避免了 79% (15/19)的入组患者接受不必要的 SLNB。表 1.通过磁race/放射性同位素检测到的淋巴结(LN)数量、活检和转移阳性引文格式:Mary Bajomo、Ivan Marin、Jessica Montalvan、Margarita Riojas-Barrett、Logan Healy、Elizabeth Bonefas、Stacey Carter、Alastair Thompson。SENTINOT2- 使用超顺磁性氧化铁示踪剂避免不必要的前哨淋巴结活检[摘要]。在:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-20-01.
{"title":"Abstract PO5-20-01: SENTINOT2- Use of superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer to avoid unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsies","authors":"Mary Bajomo, Ivan Marin, Jessica Montalvan, Margarita Riojas-Barrett, Logan Healy, E. Bonefas, Stacey Carter, Alastair Thompson","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-20-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-20-01","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Background/Purpose: The use of superparamagnetic nanoparticles of iron oxide tracers (Magtrace) and electromagnetometers (SentiMag) for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) during breast cancer surgery has been demonstrated to be noninferior to traditional radioisotope (RI) and blue dye detection, with additional safety benefits. Previous work has shown that transcutaneous detection of SLN with Magtrace/Sentimag is possible for over 30 days. Because of the safety, efficacy, and long detection window of Magtrace, we aim to investigate the use of Magtrace to prevent unnecessary SLN biopsies (SLNB) in breast cancer surgery. SLNB are commonly performed during breast conserving surgeries (BCS) or mastectomy for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Because metastasis is not expected in patients diagnosed with DCIS, SLNB may be unnecessary and potentially harmful. However, in 15-25% of cases, unexpected invasive carcinoma is found during the post-surgical histopathological analysis of the resected breast tissue. For these cases, if SLNB are forgone during the initial surgery, SLNB during a second (delayed) procedure is the usual standard of care to evaluate SLN for metastasis. However, potential changes to lymphatic drainage following the initial resection may affect tracer localization to SLN. Consequently, we aim to compare SLN detection rates during delayed SLNB with Magtrace administered prior to initial BCS or mastectomy and subsequent RI tracer administered prior to delayed SLNB.\u0000 Methods: SENTINOT2 is an ongoing international trial with BCM as the sole US site. For eligible patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, Magtrace will be administered prior to BCS or mastectomy. If invasive carcinoma is found from the post-surgical histopathological analysis, patients will receive delayed SLNB within 4 weeks of their initial surgery. Prior to delayed SLNB, patients will be randomized into two groups differing in the order of modality used for SLN detection (Magtrace or RI). Subjects with the following conditions will be excluded from the study: hypersensitivity to Magtrace, iron overload disease, pregnancy, and lactation. The total expected accrual for this study is 538 subjects globally and 50 subjects at BCM.\u0000 Results: Currently, 19 patients have been enrolled in SENTINOT2. The subject population is 11% Asian, 26% Black/African American, and 47% Caucasian with non-Hispanic ethnicity. 5% of subjects identified as Hispanic Caucasian and 11% of subjects declined to report their race or ethnicity. 79% of patients had mastectomies, while 21% had BCS. After post-surgical histopathological analysis, 21% (4/19) patients were determined to have invasive carcinoma and received delayed SLNB. 50% (2/4) of these patients were randomized to have Magtrace as their first SLN detection modality (Mag-RI) while the other 50% (2/4) had RI as their first SLN detection modality (RI-Mag). Table 1 shows comparable SLN dete","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO5-18-10: Omission of SLNB in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients with radiologic and pathologic complete response in the breast after NAST: a single-arm, prospective surgical trial (EUBREAST-01 trial, GBG 104) 摘要 PO5-18-10:三阴性和HER2阳性乳腺癌患者在NAST术后乳腺放射学和病理学完全反应时不进行SLNB:单臂前瞻性手术试验(EUBREAST-01试验,GBG 104)
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-18-10
T. Reimer, B. Gerber, Thorsten Kuehn, Nikola Bangemann, A. Kleine-Tebbe, A. Stefek, Ulrike Doerste, Carolin Hammerle, Oliver Hoffmann, Alexander Hein, Isabel Rubio, F. Peintinger, K. Mehta, S. Loibl, E. Botteri, Oreste D Gentilini
Background: Currently, axillary surgery for breast cancer is considered a staging procedure that does not seem to influence breast cancer mortality since the risk of developing metastasis depends mainly on the biological behavior of the primary (seed-and-soil model). Based on this, postsurgical therapy should be considered based on biological tumor characteristics. Retrospective data of cancer registry trials showed a strong correlation between breast pathologic complete response (pCR) and nodal pCR depending on intrinsic subtypes. Improvements in systemic treatments for breast cancer have increased the rates of pCR in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), offering the opportunity to decrease, and perhaps eliminate, surgery in patients who have a pCR. Trial design: The EUBREAST network designed a clinical trial (NCT04101851) in which only patients with the highest likelihood of having a pCR after NAST (triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer) will be included, and type of surgery will be defined according to the response to NAST rather than on the classical T and N status at presentation. In the ongoing trial, axillary surgery will be eliminated (no axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB]) for initially clinical node-negative (cN0) patients with radiologic complete remission (rCR) and a breast pCR (ypT0/ypTis) as determined in the lumpectomy specimen. The trial design is a multicenter single-arm study with a limited number of patients (N=440 as the screening population with an expected 80% pCR-rate) which might give practice-changing results in a short period, sparing the time and the costs of a randomized comparison. Patients will be recruited in European countries (Austria, Germany, Italy, and Spain) over 48 months. Inclusion criteria: -Written informed consent -Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast (core biopsy). Multifocal or multicentric tumors are allowed if breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is planned. -Age at diagnosis at least 18 years -imaging techniques with estimated tumor stage between cT1-T3 before NAST -triple-negative (TNBC) or HER2-positive invasive breast cancer -TNBC is defined by: ER-negative (< 10% positive cells in IHC) and PgR-negative (< 10% positive cells in IHC), HER2-negative -clinically and sonographically tumor-free axilla before core biopsy (cN0/iN0) -in cases with cN0 and iN+, a negative core biopsy or fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the sonographically suspected lymph node is required -no evidence for distant metastasis (M0) -standard NAST with rCR -planned BCS with postoperative external whole-breast irradiation (conventional fractionation or hypofractionation) Primary objective: 3-year rate of axillary recurrence-free survival (ARFS) after BCS Statistics: The calculated total case number for per-protocol analysis is N=350, and the expected total number of screened patients is N=440. The assumption for acceptable 3-year ARFS ≥98.5% in the experime
背景:目前,乳腺癌的腋窝手术被认为是一种分期手术,似乎不会影响乳腺癌的死亡率,因为发生转移的风险主要取决于原发肿瘤的生物学行为(种子-土壤模型)。因此,应根据肿瘤的生物学特征考虑术后治疗。癌症登记试验的回顾性数据显示,乳腺癌病理完全缓解(pCR)和结节完全缓解(pCR)之间有很强的相关性,这取决于内在亚型。乳腺癌全身治疗方法的改进提高了接受新辅助全身治疗(NAST)患者的 pCR 率,为获得 pCR 的患者减少甚至取消手术提供了机会。试验设计:EUBREAST网络设计了一项临床试验(NCT04101851),该试验只纳入接受新辅助系统治疗后最有可能获得pCR的患者(三阴性或HER2阳性乳腺癌),手术类型将根据患者对新辅助系统治疗的反应而非发病时的传统T和N状态来确定。在正在进行的试验中,对于最初临床结节阴性(cN0)、放射学完全缓解(rCR)且乳腺 pCR(ypT0/ypTis)由肿块切除术标本确定的患者,将取消腋窝手术(无腋窝前哨淋巴结活检 [SLNB])。试验设计为多中心单臂研究,患者人数有限(筛查人群为 440 人,预计 pCR 率为 80%),可能会在短期内产生改变实践的结果,从而节省随机对比的时间和成本。患者将在欧洲各国(奥地利、德国、意大利和西班牙)招募,为期 48 个月。纳入标准-经病理证实为单侧原发性浸润性乳腺癌(核心活检)。如果计划进行保乳手术(BCS),则允许多灶性或多中心性肿瘤。-确诊时年龄至少 18 岁 -在进行 NAST 之前,通过影像学技术估计肿瘤分期在 cT1-T3 之间 -三阴性(TNBC)或 HER2 阳性浸润性乳腺癌 -TNBC 的定义是:ER阴性(IHC中阳性细胞<10%)和PgR阴性(IHC中阳性细胞<10%),HER2阴性 - 核心活检前临床和声像图显示腋窝无肿瘤(cN0/iN0) - cN0和iN+的病例、在 cN0 和 iN+ 的病例中,需要进行阴性核心活检或声像图可疑淋巴结的细针穿刺活检 - 无远处转移证据(M0) - 带有 rCR 的标准 NAST - 计划 BCS,术后进行全乳房外部照射(常规分次或低分次) 主要目标:3 年腋窝复发率:BCS 后 3 年无腋窝复发生存率(ARFS) 统计:按方案分析计算出的病例总数为 N=350,预计筛选出的患者总数为 N=440。实验组可接受的 3 年无腋窝复发生存率(ARFS)≥98.5% 的假设是基于之前的研究结果。时间安排:-首例患者2021 年 1 月 -最后一名患者:2024 年 12 月2024 年 12 月 -主要结果分析:目前招募情况:2023 年 6 月,招募了 255 名患者,其中大部分在德国。联系方式:Prof:Toralf Reimer 博士教授(eubreast-01@kliniksued-rostock.de),研究主席 Oreste D. Gentilini 博士(gentilini.oreste@hsr.it),研究联合主席 资助方:Else Kroener-Fresenius 基金会、德国森学学会、罗斯托克大学(德国)和圣拉斐尔医院(意大利米兰)。引用格式:Toralf Reimer、Bernd Gerber、Thorsten Kuehn、Nikola Bangemann、Anke Kleine-Tebbe、Andrea Stefek、Ulrike Doerste、Carolin Hammerle、Oliver Hoffmann、Alexander Hein、Isabel Rubio、Florentia Peintinger、Keyur Mehta、Sibylle Loibl、Edoardo Botteri、Oreste Gentilini。三阴性和 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者在 NAST 后乳腺放射学和病理学完全反应时省略 SLNB:单臂前瞻性手术试验(EUBREAST-01 试验,GBG 104)[摘要]。In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-18-10。
{"title":"Abstract PO5-18-10: Omission of SLNB in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients with radiologic and pathologic complete response in the breast after NAST: a single-arm, prospective surgical trial (EUBREAST-01 trial, GBG 104)","authors":"T. Reimer, B. Gerber, Thorsten Kuehn, Nikola Bangemann, A. Kleine-Tebbe, A. Stefek, Ulrike Doerste, Carolin Hammerle, Oliver Hoffmann, Alexander Hein, Isabel Rubio, F. Peintinger, K. Mehta, S. Loibl, E. Botteri, Oreste D Gentilini","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-18-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po5-18-10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Background: Currently, axillary surgery for breast cancer is considered a staging procedure that does not seem to influence breast cancer mortality since the risk of developing metastasis depends mainly on the biological behavior of the primary (seed-and-soil model). Based on this, postsurgical therapy should be considered based on biological tumor characteristics. Retrospective data of cancer registry trials showed a strong correlation between breast pathologic complete response (pCR) and nodal pCR depending on intrinsic subtypes. Improvements in systemic treatments for breast cancer have increased the rates of pCR in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), offering the opportunity to decrease, and perhaps eliminate, surgery in patients who have a pCR. Trial design: The EUBREAST network designed a clinical trial (NCT04101851) in which only patients with the highest likelihood of having a pCR after NAST (triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer) will be included, and type of surgery will be defined according to the response to NAST rather than on the classical T and N status at presentation. In the ongoing trial, axillary surgery will be eliminated (no axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB]) for initially clinical node-negative (cN0) patients with radiologic complete remission (rCR) and a breast pCR (ypT0/ypTis) as determined in the lumpectomy specimen. The trial design is a multicenter single-arm study with a limited number of patients (N=440 as the screening population with an expected 80% pCR-rate) which might give practice-changing results in a short period, sparing the time and the costs of a randomized comparison. Patients will be recruited in European countries (Austria, Germany, Italy, and Spain) over 48 months. Inclusion criteria: -Written informed consent -Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast (core biopsy). Multifocal or multicentric tumors are allowed if breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is planned. -Age at diagnosis at least 18 years -imaging techniques with estimated tumor stage between cT1-T3 before NAST -triple-negative (TNBC) or HER2-positive invasive breast cancer -TNBC is defined by: ER-negative (&lt; 10% positive cells in IHC) and PgR-negative (&lt; 10% positive cells in IHC), HER2-negative -clinically and sonographically tumor-free axilla before core biopsy (cN0/iN0) -in cases with cN0 and iN+, a negative core biopsy or fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the sonographically suspected lymph node is required -no evidence for distant metastasis (M0) -standard NAST with rCR -planned BCS with postoperative external whole-breast irradiation (conventional fractionation or hypofractionation) Primary objective: 3-year rate of axillary recurrence-free survival (ARFS) after BCS Statistics: The calculated total case number for per-protocol analysis is N=350, and the expected total number of screened patients is N=440. The assumption for acceptable 3-year ARFS ≥98.5% in the experime","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"4 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO1-07-10: Blood Based Early Cancer Detection Assay 摘要 PO1-07-10:基于血液的癌症早期检测试剂盒
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-07-10
Andrew Carson, Michael Wang, Bryan Leatham, Kristin Fathe, Eun-Hae Cho, Tae-Rim Lee, Junnam Lee, J. Ahn, Dasom Kim, Byung In Lee
Background: Breast cancer screening programs utilizing mammography have been shown to be highly effective in identifying breast cancer in women over the age of 40. High breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and makes mammograms more difficult to interpret, decreasing their sensitivity. In the spring of 2023, the FDA, who certifies all mammography facilities under the Mammography Quality Standards Act, updated its regulations to require that breast density status be reported to all individuals receiving a mammogram. The new guidelines now require individuals with dense breast tissue be notified of this status. The guidelines also recommend these women discuss additional screening options with their healthcare providers1. These additional screening options may include breast tomosynthesis, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and/or molecular breast imaging. Many of these options require additional exposure to radiation, are expensive, and are not equitably available across the country. In addition, they all require a follow-up appointment. Compliance can be challenging given the top barriers to mammography cited include the need for transportation, child-care, and the ability to take time off from work2. Genece Health is developing a simpler and less expensive screening solution that identifies the presence of early to late-stage breast cancer using cfDNA from a single blood draw. The Genece Health assay utilizes an algorithm that leverages Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to analyze fragment size and end motif patterns in cfDNA as well as regional mutational density to detect presence of ctDNA originating from breast cancer. This algorithm provides highly sensitive and specific results in a preliminary data set. Methods: The preliminary data set, presented herein, is a cohort of over 50 retrospective breast cancer plasma samples and over 100 presumed normal samples. The breast cancer samples were collected at all stages of progression, from stage 0, or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), through stage IV. The majority ( >50%) were from stage I breast cancer. 400 µL of double spun plasma, collected in Streck BCT devices, was processed to purify and isolate cfDNA. cfDNA was used to create WGS libraries that were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000. Sequence data were analyzed using a bioinformatics pipeline that yields an ensemble probability that correlates to the presence or absence of ctDNA from breast cancer. Results: The Genece Health assay and algorithm performed with a specificity greater than 85%. With this specificity, the assay had a sensitivity greater than 85% in samples from stages II to IV and a slightly lower sensitivity in stage 0 and I samples. Follow-up analyses were conducted to stratify performance based on breast cancer type (e.g. invasive ductal carcinoma vs invasive lobular carcinoma) and HR, PR, and HER2 status (e.g. HER2-negatives vs HER2-positives). Conclusions: The presented preliminary data indicate
背景:利用乳房 X 射线照相术进行的乳腺癌筛查计划已被证明能非常有效地发现 40 岁以上妇女的乳腺癌。高乳腺密度是乳腺癌的一个独立风险因素,它使乳房 X 光检查更难以解读,从而降低了检查的灵敏度。2023 年春,根据《乳房 X 射线照相质量标准法案》对所有乳房 X 射线照相设施进行认证的美国食品及药物管理局更新了其规定,要求所有接受乳房 X 射线照相检查的人都必须报告乳房密度状况。新指南现在要求向乳腺组织致密的人告知这一状态。指南还建议这些妇女与其医疗保健提供者讨论其他筛查方案1。这些额外的筛查方案可能包括乳腺断层扫描、乳腺核磁共振成像、乳腺超声和/或分子乳腺成像。其中许多方法都需要额外暴露于辐射中,价格昂贵,而且无法在全国范围内公平提供。此外,它们都需要预约复诊。鉴于乳房 X 射线照相术的最大障碍包括交通需求、儿童保育以及能否请假2 ,因此遵守规定可能具有挑战性。Genece Health 正在开发一种更简单、成本更低的筛查解决方案,利用一次抽血中的 cfDNA 来确定是否存在早期至晚期乳腺癌。Genece Health 检测利用人工智能和机器学习算法来分析 cfDNA 中的片段大小和末端主题模式以及区域突变密度,以检测是否存在源自乳腺癌的 ctDNA。该算法可在初步数据集中提供高灵敏度和特异性的结果。方法:本文介绍的初步数据集是由 50 多份回顾性乳腺癌血浆样本和 100 多份假定正常样本组成的队列。乳腺癌样本收集于乳腺癌进展的各个阶段,从 0 期或导管原位癌(DCIS)到 IV 期。大部分样本(>50%)来自 I 期乳腺癌。在 Streck BCT 设备中收集的 400 µL 双旋血浆经过处理后纯化并分离出 cfDNA。cfDNA 用于创建 WGS 文库,并在 NovaSeq 6000 上进行测序。使用生物信息学管道分析序列数据,得出与乳腺癌中是否存在ctDNA相关的集合概率。结果Genece Health 检测方法和算法的特异性超过 85%。在这种特异性下,该检测方法对 II 期至 IV 期样本的灵敏度超过 85%,而对 0 期和 I 期样本的灵敏度略低。后续分析根据乳腺癌类型(如浸润性导管癌与浸润性小叶癌)、HR、PR 和 HER2 状态(如 HER2 阴性与 HER2 阳性)对检测结果进行了分层。结论所提供的初步数据表明,Genece Health 技术可作为乳腺 X 线照相术的补充,用于致密乳腺组织等适应症,因为这些适应症对简便、经济的乳腺癌监测方法的需求尚未得到满足。通过血液检测来补充乳腺 X 射线照相术的不足,可以减少美国女性最常提到的获取乳腺 X 射线照相术的障碍。使用更多样本进行后续研究,并对算法进行更多的培训和优化,将能提高性能,使该检测方法能检测出所有类型和阶段的乳腺癌。参考文献1.FDA 新闻稿 09 March 2023.FDA 更新乳腺 X 射线照相法规,要求报告乳腺密度信息并加强设施监督。2.Henderson LM et al. The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Self-Reported Access to Health Care Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography. J Womens Health.J Womens Health.2020 Nov;29(11):1437-1446.引用格式:Andrew Carson, Michael Wang, Bryan Leatham, Kristin Fathe, Eun-Hae Cho, Tae-Rim Lee, Junnam Lee, Jin Mo Ahn, Dasom Kim, Byung In Lee.基于血液的早期癌症检测方法[摘要]。In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-07-10.
{"title":"Abstract PO1-07-10: Blood Based Early Cancer Detection Assay","authors":"Andrew Carson, Michael Wang, Bryan Leatham, Kristin Fathe, Eun-Hae Cho, Tae-Rim Lee, Junnam Lee, J. Ahn, Dasom Kim, Byung In Lee","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-07-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-07-10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Background: Breast cancer screening programs utilizing mammography have been shown to be highly effective in identifying breast cancer in women over the age of 40. High breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and makes mammograms more difficult to interpret, decreasing their sensitivity. In the spring of 2023, the FDA, who certifies all mammography facilities under the Mammography Quality Standards Act, updated its regulations to require that breast density status be reported to all individuals receiving a mammogram. The new guidelines now require individuals with dense breast tissue be notified of this status. The guidelines also recommend these women discuss additional screening options with their healthcare providers1. These additional screening options may include breast tomosynthesis, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and/or molecular breast imaging. Many of these options require additional exposure to radiation, are expensive, and are not equitably available across the country. In addition, they all require a follow-up appointment. Compliance can be challenging given the top barriers to mammography cited include the need for transportation, child-care, and the ability to take time off from work2. Genece Health is developing a simpler and less expensive screening solution that identifies the presence of early to late-stage breast cancer using cfDNA from a single blood draw. The Genece Health assay utilizes an algorithm that leverages Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to analyze fragment size and end motif patterns in cfDNA as well as regional mutational density to detect presence of ctDNA originating from breast cancer. This algorithm provides highly sensitive and specific results in a preliminary data set. Methods: The preliminary data set, presented herein, is a cohort of over 50 retrospective breast cancer plasma samples and over 100 presumed normal samples. The breast cancer samples were collected at all stages of progression, from stage 0, or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), through stage IV. The majority ( &gt;50%) were from stage I breast cancer. 400 µL of double spun plasma, collected in Streck BCT devices, was processed to purify and isolate cfDNA. cfDNA was used to create WGS libraries that were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000. Sequence data were analyzed using a bioinformatics pipeline that yields an ensemble probability that correlates to the presence or absence of ctDNA from breast cancer. Results: The Genece Health assay and algorithm performed with a specificity greater than 85%. With this specificity, the assay had a sensitivity greater than 85% in samples from stages II to IV and a slightly lower sensitivity in stage 0 and I samples. Follow-up analyses were conducted to stratify performance based on breast cancer type (e.g. invasive ductal carcinoma vs invasive lobular carcinoma) and HR, PR, and HER2 status (e.g. HER2-negatives vs HER2-positives). Conclusions: The presented preliminary data indicate","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO3-20-10: Case Series: Invasive Secretory Carcinoma 摘要 PO3-20-10:病例系列:浸润性分泌性癌
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po3-20-10
Lauren Geisel, Hemanth Venkatesh, Alyssa Obermiller, Quyen Chu, Jessica Gielow, Danielle Henry
Secretory variant invasive ductal carcinoma is not well described in the literature but is defined by its unique histopathology. These tumors stain positive for S100 and are typically triple negative hormonal cancers with an overall good prognosis. There is speculation that secretory carcinoma in adults is more aggressive with a greater likelihood for tumor recurrence. We present two case studies of this rare histopathologic diagnosis. First, a 76-year-old female with a recurrent secretory variant, invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast. Second, a 68-year-old male who presented with invasive and in situ secretory carcinoma. A thorough chart review of all available institutional and outside institution records was performed from initial diagnosis to current treatment. Background information and de-identified patient information was summarized for this case series. This is a 76-year-old female who presented to her physician in 2011 with a palpable left breast and axillary mass. Her workup demonstrated ER+/PR+/HER2- invasive ductal carcinoma with lobular features of the left breast measuring 2.3 cm, along with a 1.5 cm malignant axillary lymph node. She underwent a left breast lumpectomy with axillary dissection. She underwent adjuvant whole breast radiation, axillary nodal radiation, and was placed on anastrozole therapy for 5 years. Seven years later a recurrence was noted in the superior aspect of the left breast. MRI guided biopsy revealed recurrent left breast cancer with pathology of invasive ductal carcinoma, secretory variant. She elected to undergo lumpectomy alone. Final pathology demonstrated invasive ductal carcinoma, secretory variant, ER negative (0%), PR negative (0%), HER2 negative (0%), pT1bNx. She underwent accelerated adjuvant partial breast radiation. Follow up and surveillance with bilateral breast MRI two years later demonstrated a new left breast mass, found to be triple negative, recurrent secretory variant invasive ductal carcinoma. She underwent definitive treatment with a left skin sparing mastectomy, right sentinel lymph node biopsy, and a latissimus dorsi flap with implant placement. Final pathology demonstrated multifocal recurrent secretory carcinoma, two foci measuring 6 and 11 mm. Our second patient was a 68-year-old male who initially presented to the clinic for evaluation of a ventral incisional hernia. During his initial assessment, a palpable retro-areolar nodule was noted on physical exam. Subsequent mammography demonstrated a hypoechoic mass with irregular margins measuring 2.8 x 2.3 x 1.7 cm along with increased vascularity and calcifications. An ultrasound guided biopsy demonstrated invasive secretory carcinoma. Initial pathologic testing of the tumor demonstrated ER positive (5%), PR positive (1%), and HER2 negative. The patient was taken to the operating room for a total mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. His postoperative pathology demonstrated negative margins, and invasive secretory c
分泌变异型浸润性导管癌在文献中的描述并不详尽,但却以其独特的组织病理学来定义。这些肿瘤的 S100 染色阳性,通常是激素三阴性癌症,总体预后良好。据推测,成人分泌性癌更具侵袭性,肿瘤复发的可能性更大。我们介绍两例这种罕见组织病理学诊断的病例研究。第一例是一名 76 岁的女性,左侧乳房浸润性导管癌的复发性分泌性变异。第二例是一名 68 岁的男性,患有浸润性和原位分泌性癌。从最初诊断到目前的治疗,我们对所有可用的机构和外部机构记录进行了全面的病历审查。本病例系列总结了背景信息和去标识化的患者信息。患者是一名 76 岁的女性,2011 年因可触及左侧乳房和腋窝肿块就诊。她的检查结果显示左侧乳房有 2.3 厘米长的ER+/PR+/HER2-浸润性导管癌,并伴有 1.5 厘米长的恶性腋窝淋巴结。她接受了左乳肿块切除术和腋窝清扫术。她接受了全乳房辅助放射治疗和腋窝结节放射治疗,并接受了为期 5 年的阿那曲唑治疗。七年后,她发现左侧乳房上部复发。核磁共振成像引导下的活检显示左侧乳腺癌复发,病理结果为浸润性导管癌,分泌型。她选择接受单纯肿块切除术。最终病理结果显示为浸润性导管癌,分泌型,ER阴性(0%),PR阴性(0%),HER2阴性(0%),pT1bNx。她接受了加速辅助部分乳腺放射治疗。两年后,通过双侧乳房磁共振成像进行随访和监测,发现左侧乳房新肿块,为三阴性、复发性分泌变异型浸润性导管癌。她接受了左侧保乳切除术、右侧前哨淋巴结活检和背阔肌皮瓣植入术。最终病理结果显示为多灶复发性分泌性癌,两个病灶的大小分别为 6 毫米和 11 毫米。第二位患者是一名 68 岁的男性,最初因腹部切口疝就诊。在对他进行初步评估时,体格检查发现了一个可触及的乳晕后结节。随后的乳房 X 光检查显示,该肿块为低回声肿块,边缘不规则,大小为 2.8 x 2.3 x 1.7 厘米,伴有血管增多和钙化。超声引导活检显示为浸润性分泌性癌。肿瘤的初步病理检测显示ER阳性(5%)、PR阳性(1%)和HER2阴性。患者被送入手术室进行了全乳切除术,并进行了前哨淋巴结活检。术后病理结果显示:边缘阴性,浸润性分泌癌,淋巴结转移阴性。浸润性导管癌的分泌型变异非常罕见,这是由其独特的免疫组化特征决定的。我们介绍了本院的两例分泌性癌病例。数据显示,分泌型乳腺癌患者的局部复发率较高,占 33-44% 的病例。Ki-67 指数已被用作疾病转移和复发的预后指标。目前的治疗方案多种多样,但以手术治疗为主。本报告显示,尽管该病病情轻微,但多发和复发的可能性是存在的。鉴于有关这种亚型癌症的数据有限,有必要进行更多调查,以说明辅助治疗方案的有效性。病例 1 --插入图片--组织病理学检查(200 倍)显示为浸润性癌,伴有致密的嗜酸性分泌物。通过免疫组化检查,细胞ER(0%)和PR(0%)阴性,HER2Neu评分为0,支持浸润性分泌癌的诊断。病例 2--插入图象--200 倍组织病理学检查显示浸润性癌伴有致密的嗜酸性分泌物。肿瘤细胞的 CK5/6(斑片状)、CD117、ER(局灶性弱)和 S100 阳性;p63 和 calponin 阴性,支持浸润性分泌癌的诊断。荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测到 NTRK3 基因重排。引用格式:Lauren Geisel, Hemanth Venkatesh, Alyssa Obermiller, Quyen Chu, Jessica Gielow, Danielle Henry.病例系列:侵袭性分泌性癌[摘要]。在:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-20-10.
{"title":"Abstract PO3-20-10: Case Series: Invasive Secretory Carcinoma","authors":"Lauren Geisel, Hemanth Venkatesh, Alyssa Obermiller, Quyen Chu, Jessica Gielow, Danielle Henry","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po3-20-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po3-20-10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Secretory variant invasive ductal carcinoma is not well described in the literature but is defined by its unique histopathology. These tumors stain positive for S100 and are typically triple negative hormonal cancers with an overall good prognosis. There is speculation that secretory carcinoma in adults is more aggressive with a greater likelihood for tumor recurrence. We present two case studies of this rare histopathologic diagnosis. First, a 76-year-old female with a recurrent secretory variant, invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast. Second, a 68-year-old male who presented with invasive and in situ secretory carcinoma.\u0000 A thorough chart review of all available institutional and outside institution records was performed from initial diagnosis to current treatment. Background information and de-identified patient information was summarized for this case series.\u0000 This is a 76-year-old female who presented to her physician in 2011 with a palpable left breast and axillary mass. Her workup demonstrated ER+/PR+/HER2- invasive ductal carcinoma with lobular features of the left breast measuring 2.3 cm, along with a 1.5 cm malignant axillary lymph node. She underwent a left breast lumpectomy with axillary dissection. She underwent adjuvant whole breast radiation, axillary nodal radiation, and was placed on anastrozole therapy for 5 years. Seven years later a recurrence was noted in the superior aspect of the left breast. MRI guided biopsy revealed recurrent left breast cancer with pathology of invasive ductal carcinoma, secretory variant. She elected to undergo lumpectomy alone. Final pathology demonstrated invasive ductal carcinoma, secretory variant, ER negative (0%), PR negative (0%), HER2 negative (0%), pT1bNx. She underwent accelerated adjuvant partial breast radiation. Follow up and surveillance with bilateral breast MRI two years later demonstrated a new left breast mass, found to be triple negative, recurrent secretory variant invasive ductal carcinoma. She underwent definitive treatment with a left skin sparing mastectomy, right sentinel lymph node biopsy, and a latissimus dorsi flap with implant placement. Final pathology demonstrated multifocal recurrent secretory carcinoma, two foci measuring 6 and 11 mm.\u0000 Our second patient was a 68-year-old male who initially presented to the clinic for evaluation of a ventral incisional hernia. During his initial assessment, a palpable retro-areolar nodule was noted on physical exam. Subsequent mammography demonstrated a hypoechoic mass with irregular margins measuring 2.8 x 2.3 x 1.7 cm along with increased vascularity and calcifications. An ultrasound guided biopsy demonstrated invasive secretory carcinoma. Initial pathologic testing of the tumor demonstrated ER positive (5%), PR positive (1%), and HER2 negative. The patient was taken to the operating room for a total mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. His postoperative pathology demonstrated negative margins, and invasive secretory c","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO1-10-01: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer 摘要 PO1-10-01:炎症性乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解率和生存率的种族/族裔差异
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-10-01
Rebecca Zasloff, Samantha Thomas, Kendra M Parrish, Astrid Botty Van Den Bruele, G. DiLalla, Maggie DiNome, Laura Rosenberger, Hannah Woriax, E. S. Hwang, Jennifer Plichta, Akiko Chiba
Radiation Therapy Toxicities and Survival Outcomes in Monoallelic ATM Variant Carriers with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Rayan Bensenane1 MD, Arnaud Beddok1,2,3 MD, Nadine Andrieu4 PhD, Fabienne Lesueur4 PhD, Eve Cavaciuti 4 MSc, Dorothee Le Gal4 MSc, Eon-Marchais Severine4 PhD, Dominique Stoppa Lyonnet 5MD PhD, Youlia Kirova1 MD 1. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, France. 2. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA 3. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO U1288 Orsay, France 4. Inserm, U900, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France 5.Department of Genetics, Institut Curie; Inserm U830, Institut Curie; Paris-Cité University Abstract (characters: 2952; max 3400 characters, not include spaces) Background: The Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene, involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, can contribute to radiosensitivity when a bi-allelic variant is present and lead to Ataxia-Telangiectasia syndrome. Moreover, monoallelic ATM pathologic variant (PV) carriers, especially women, has an estimated occurrence rate of 0.5-1% globally and face a 2 to 3-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Despite evidence of in vitro radiosensitivity in cells derived from monoallelic variant carriers, there is a dearth of patient studies examining the risk of radiation-induced toxicity. This study aims to explore radiation therapy (RT) toxicities in non-metastatic breast cancer women carrying a germline monoallelic ATM variant, compared to non-carriers. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated at Institut Curie, Paris from 1999 to 2014 and participating to CoF-AT (a French national study) and GENESIS database. ATM variant screenings encompassed both PV and non-PV, with toxicities evaluated using CTCAE v.5. Variants were classified as pathogenic, variant of unknown significance (VUS), or benign. Follow-up started from age/date at breast cancer to acute, late toxicities, disease recurrence or last news. Survival and toxicity comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Chi-square tests, respectively, with a significance level of α set at 0.05. Results: Among 50 patients, nine were ATM variant carriers (3 PV/5 VUS/1 benign), and 41 were non-carriers. Most patients had no smoking history (68%), and invasive ductal carcinoma was the predominant diagnosis (82%). The majority underwent breast-conservative surgery (80%), and the dominant RT techniques were 3D-Conformational Radiation Therapy (70%) and Isocentric Lateral Decubitus (30%). The median RT dose was 50 Gy over an average period of 36.5 days. With a median follow-up of 12 years post-diagnosis, no significant difference in acute dermatitis, esophagitis, lymphedema, cutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, or hea
非转移性乳腺癌单倍型 ATM 变异携带者的放疗毒性和生存结果:回顾性分析 Rayan Bensenane1 MD, Arnaud Beddok1,2,3 MD, Nadine Andrieu4 PhD, Fabienne Lesueur4 PhD, Eve Cavaciuti 4 MSc, Dorothee Le Gal4 MSc, Eon-Marchais Severine4 PhD, Dominique Stoppa Lyonnet 5MD PhD, Youlia Kirova1 MD 1.法国巴黎/圣克卢/奥赛,居里研究所,PSL 研究大学,放射肿瘤部。2.戈登医学影像中心,麻省总医院,哈佛医学院,125 Nashua St.法国巴黎,Inserm,U900,居里研究所,PSL 研究大学,巴黎高科矿业大学 5.居里研究所遗传学系;Inserm U830,居里研究所;巴黎市立大学 摘要(字符数:2952;最多 3400 个字符,不包括空格) 背景:共济失调-特朗吉克斯综合征(Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated,ATM)基因参与DNA双链断裂的修复,当出现双等位基因变异时,可导致辐射敏感性,并导致共济失调-特朗吉克斯综合征。此外,ATM单倍型病理变异体(PV)携带者,尤其是女性,在全球的发生率估计为0.5-1%,罹患乳腺癌的风险增加了2-3倍。尽管有证据表明单等位基因变异携带者的细胞在体外具有放射敏感性,但对辐射诱导毒性风险的患者研究却十分缺乏。本研究旨在探讨与非携带者相比,携带种系单倍性ATM变异体的非转移性乳腺癌妇女的放射治疗(RT)毒性。研究方法这项回顾性研究的对象是1999年至2014年在巴黎居里研究所接受治疗并参与CoF-AT(法国国家研究)和GENESIS数据库的患者。ATM变异筛选包括PV和非PV,毒性采用CTCAE v.5进行评估。变异分为致病变异、意义不明变异(VUS)或良性变异。随访从乳腺癌患者的年龄/日期开始,直至出现急性、晚期毒性、疾病复发或最后一次消息。生存率和毒性比较分别采用卡普兰-梅耶生存分析和卡方检验,显著性水平α设为0.05。结果50名患者中,9人为ATM变异携带者(3个PV/5个VUS/1个良性),41人为非携带者。大多数患者无吸烟史(68%),浸润性导管癌是主要诊断依据(82%)。大多数患者接受了乳腺保守手术(80%),主要的 RT 技术是三维适形放射治疗(70%)和等中心侧卧位放射治疗(30%)。中位 RT 剂量为 50 Gy,平均时间为 36.5 天。诊断后的中位随访时间为 12 年,两组患者在急性皮炎、食管炎、淋巴水肿、皮肤纤维化、毛细血管扩张或心脏病方面无明显差异。总生存率(OS)分析表明,5年的OS为98%,10年时降至89%。ATM变异携带者的5年、10年和15年生存率分别为100%、89%和89%,与非携带者相似。卡普兰-梅耶尔分析显示,各组患者的5年、10年和15年总生存率、无进展生存率、局部失败特异性生存率和对侧乳腺癌发病率均无明显差异。结论在非转移性乳腺癌患者中,单倍性ATM变异载体状态对急性或晚期RT毒性和生存结果没有显著影响。这些研究结果来自于一个小型队列,强调了进一步验证前瞻性研究的必要性。表:单等位基因ATM变异携带者与非携带者放疗后的急性和晚期毒性引文格式:Rebecca Zasloff、Samantha Thomas、Kendra Parrish、Astrid Botty van de Bruele、Gayle DiLalla、Maggie DiNome、Laura Rosenberger、Hannah Woriax、E Shelley Hwang、Jennifer Plichta、Akiko Chiba。炎症性乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解率和生存率的种族/族裔差异 [摘要].在:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-10-01。
{"title":"Abstract PO1-10-01: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer","authors":"Rebecca Zasloff, Samantha Thomas, Kendra M Parrish, Astrid Botty Van Den Bruele, G. DiLalla, Maggie DiNome, Laura Rosenberger, Hannah Woriax, E. S. Hwang, Jennifer Plichta, Akiko Chiba","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-10-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-10-01","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Radiation Therapy Toxicities and Survival Outcomes in Monoallelic ATM Variant Carriers with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Rayan Bensenane1 MD, Arnaud Beddok1,2,3 MD, Nadine Andrieu4 PhD, Fabienne Lesueur4 PhD, Eve Cavaciuti 4 MSc, Dorothee Le Gal4 MSc, Eon-Marchais Severine4 PhD, Dominique Stoppa Lyonnet 5MD PhD, Youlia Kirova1 MD 1. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, France. 2. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA 3. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO U1288 Orsay, France 4. Inserm, U900, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France 5.Department of Genetics, Institut Curie; Inserm U830, Institut Curie; Paris-Cité University Abstract (characters: 2952; max 3400 characters, not include spaces) Background: The Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene, involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, can contribute to radiosensitivity when a bi-allelic variant is present and lead to Ataxia-Telangiectasia syndrome. Moreover, monoallelic ATM pathologic variant (PV) carriers, especially women, has an estimated occurrence rate of 0.5-1% globally and face a 2 to 3-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Despite evidence of in vitro radiosensitivity in cells derived from monoallelic variant carriers, there is a dearth of patient studies examining the risk of radiation-induced toxicity. This study aims to explore radiation therapy (RT) toxicities in non-metastatic breast cancer women carrying a germline monoallelic ATM variant, compared to non-carriers. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated at Institut Curie, Paris from 1999 to 2014 and participating to CoF-AT (a French national study) and GENESIS database. ATM variant screenings encompassed both PV and non-PV, with toxicities evaluated using CTCAE v.5. Variants were classified as pathogenic, variant of unknown significance (VUS), or benign. Follow-up started from age/date at breast cancer to acute, late toxicities, disease recurrence or last news. Survival and toxicity comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Chi-square tests, respectively, with a significance level of α set at 0.05. Results: Among 50 patients, nine were ATM variant carriers (3 PV/5 VUS/1 benign), and 41 were non-carriers. Most patients had no smoking history (68%), and invasive ductal carcinoma was the predominant diagnosis (82%). The majority underwent breast-conservative surgery (80%), and the dominant RT techniques were 3D-Conformational Radiation Therapy (70%) and Isocentric Lateral Decubitus (30%). The median RT dose was 50 Gy over an average period of 36.5 days. With a median follow-up of 12 years post-diagnosis, no significant difference in acute dermatitis, esophagitis, lymphedema, cutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, or hea","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO1-03-08: Association of patient-reported triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) knowledge with clinical trial participation 摘要 PO1-03-08:患者报告的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)知识与参与临床试验的关系
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-03-08
Megan Tesch, N. Graham, Sean J. Ryan, Melissa Hughes, E. Wrabel, N. Tung, Steve Lo, Thomas Fynan, Meredith Faggen, Natalie Sinclair, Maria Constantinou, Sarah Sinclair, N. Tayob, Nancy Lin, Ann Partridge, Eric P. Winer, S. Tolaney, A. Garrido-Castro
Background: Patients with TNBC are highly encouraged to participate in clinical trials given the lack of targeted treatment options for this breast cancer subtype. Yet little is known regarding barriers to trial participation in this population, including the impact of patients’ understanding about TNBC biology. We examined whether disease knowledge and other patient-level factors were associated with TNBC patients’ participation in trials. Methods: From a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients enrolled from 2019-present with newly diagnosed TNBC (ER/PR ≤10% also eligible), we identified those with stage I-III tumors who completed at least one survey. Surveys assessed demographics, TNBC knowledge, risk perceptions, and participation in clinical trials. Patients were assigned to Cohort A if surgery was the first intervention and Cohort B if neoadjuvant therapy was given. Medical records were reviewed to verify the accuracy of tumor characteristics reported by patients. Data was summarized with descriptive statistics and logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with trial participation. Results: Of the 137 patients included, median age was 56 years (IQR 46-63), 104 (82%) were non-Hispanic White, 10 (8%) Black, 5 (4%) Hispanic. and 110 (86%) had at least some college education. Overall, 55 (41%) had stage I tumors, 65 (48%) stage II, and 14 (10%) stage III. Among 116 patients with available clinical trial participation data, 55 (47%) reported trial participation, 59 (51%) reported no trial participation, and 2 (2%) were unsure. The majority (36/55, 65%) of trial participants were in Cohort B. Among 129 patients with TNBC knowledge data, 82 (64%) and 73 (57%) correctly reported their tumor stage and grade, respectively. Most (104/129, 81%) knew TNBC was defined as ER/PR/HER2-negative, but only 16% (21/128) knew the ER/PR-negative cut off was ≤1%. Of 98 patients with risk perception data, 30 (31%) estimated their likelihood of recurrence within the next 5 years as 0%, 60 (61%) between 10-50%, and 8 (8%) between 60-100%. When asked if TNBC patients who remain cancer-free after 3 years will most likely not experience recurrence, 44 (45%) said “True,” 13 (13%) said “False,” and 40 (41%) were unsure. On univariate analysis, trial participation was less likely in Cohort A patients (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.89, P=0.02) and more likely in stage II patients (vs. stage I, OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.09 – 5.39, P=0.03). On multivariable analysis, patients with at least some college education had higher odds of trial participation compared to patients with a college degree or higher (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.11 – 9.28, P=0.03). No associations were found for other factors, including TNBC knowledge. Conclusions: About half of TNBC patients surveyed reported participating in clinical trials. Most of these patients were undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, likely reflective of greater study availability in this setting. While TNBC knowledge was not signif
背景:鉴于TNBC亚型乳腺癌缺乏靶向治疗方案,我们非常鼓励TNBC患者参与临床试验。然而,人们对这一人群参与试验的障碍知之甚少,包括患者对 TNBC 生物学知识的了解所产生的影响。我们研究了疾病知识和其他患者层面的因素是否与 TNBC 患者参与试验有关。研究方法从一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究中,我们对 2019 年至今入组的新诊断 TNBC 患者(ER/PR ≤10% 也符合条件)进行了调查,确定了至少完成了一项调查的 I-III 期肿瘤患者。调查评估了人口统计学、TNBC 知识、风险认知和临床试验参与情况。如果患者首先接受了手术治疗,则将其归入 A 组;如果患者接受了新辅助治疗,则将其归入 B 组。对病历进行审查,以核实患者报告的肿瘤特征的准确性。通过描述性统计对数据进行总结,并使用逻辑回归法确定与参与试验相关的因素。结果:在纳入的 137 名患者中,中位年龄为 56 岁(IQR 46-63),104 人(82%)为非西班牙裔白人,10 人(8%)为黑人,5 人(4%)为西班牙裔,110 人(86%)至少受过一些大学教育。总体而言,55 人(41%)的肿瘤为 I 期,65 人(48%)为 II 期,14 人(10%)为 III 期。在 116 名有临床试验参与数据的患者中,55 人(47%)报告参与了试验,59 人(51%)报告没有参与试验,2 人(2%)不确定。在 129 名有 TNBC 知识数据的患者中,分别有 82 人(64%)和 73 人(57%)正确报告了自己的肿瘤分期和分级。大多数患者(104/129,81%)知道 TNBC 被定义为 ER/PR/HER2 阴性,但只有 16%(21/128)的患者知道 ER/PR 阴性的临界值为≤1%。在98名有风险认知数据的患者中,30人(31%)估计自己未来5年内复发的可能性为0%,60人(61%)在10%-50%之间,8人(8%)在60%-100%之间。当被问及 3 年后仍未罹患癌症的 TNBC 患者是否最有可能不再复发时,44 人(45%)表示 "是",13 人(13%)表示 "否",40 人(41%)表示不确定。单变量分析显示,A 组患者参与试验的可能性较低(OR 0.42,95% CI 0.20 - 0.89,P=0.02),II 期患者参与试验的可能性较高(与 I 期相比,OR 2.43,95% CI 1.09 - 5.39,P=0.03)。在多变量分析中,与具有大学或更高学历的患者相比,至少受过一些大学教育的患者参与试验的几率更高(OR 3.21,95% CI 1.11 - 9.28,P=0.03)。其他因素,包括对TNBC的了解程度,均未发现相关性。结论在接受调查的TNBC患者中,约有半数表示参与了临床试验。这些患者中的大多数正在接受新辅助治疗,这可能反映出在这种情况下研究的可获得性更高。虽然在这个小样本中,TNBC知识与试验参与并无明显关联,但相当多的患者错误地报告了他们的肿瘤特征,和/或似乎低估了他们的复发风险。这凸显了在治疗决策过程中加强对 TNBC 患者信息支持的必要性。我们需要开展更多的研究来了解这一人群参与试验的障碍,从而提高患者的参与度,加快TNBC更有效治疗的进展。 引用格式:Megan Tesch、Noah Graham、Sean Ryan、Melissa Hughes、Eileen Wrabel、Nadine Tung、Steve Lo、Thomas Fynan、Meredith Faggen、Natalie Sinclair、Maria Constantinou、Sarah Sinclair、Nabihah Tayob、Nancy Lin、Ann Partridge、Eric Winer、Sara Tolaney、Ana Garrido-Castro。患者报告的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)知识与临床试验参与的关联[摘要]。In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-08。
{"title":"Abstract PO1-03-08: Association of patient-reported triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) knowledge with clinical trial participation","authors":"Megan Tesch, N. Graham, Sean J. Ryan, Melissa Hughes, E. Wrabel, N. Tung, Steve Lo, Thomas Fynan, Meredith Faggen, Natalie Sinclair, Maria Constantinou, Sarah Sinclair, N. Tayob, Nancy Lin, Ann Partridge, Eric P. Winer, S. Tolaney, A. Garrido-Castro","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-03-08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-03-08","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Background: Patients with TNBC are highly encouraged to participate in clinical trials given the lack of targeted treatment options for this breast cancer subtype. Yet little is known regarding barriers to trial participation in this population, including the impact of patients’ understanding about TNBC biology. We examined whether disease knowledge and other patient-level factors were associated with TNBC patients’ participation in trials. Methods: From a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients enrolled from 2019-present with newly diagnosed TNBC (ER/PR ≤10% also eligible), we identified those with stage I-III tumors who completed at least one survey. Surveys assessed demographics, TNBC knowledge, risk perceptions, and participation in clinical trials. Patients were assigned to Cohort A if surgery was the first intervention and Cohort B if neoadjuvant therapy was given. Medical records were reviewed to verify the accuracy of tumor characteristics reported by patients. Data was summarized with descriptive statistics and logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with trial participation. Results: Of the 137 patients included, median age was 56 years (IQR 46-63), 104 (82%) were non-Hispanic White, 10 (8%) Black, 5 (4%) Hispanic. and 110 (86%) had at least some college education. Overall, 55 (41%) had stage I tumors, 65 (48%) stage II, and 14 (10%) stage III. Among 116 patients with available clinical trial participation data, 55 (47%) reported trial participation, 59 (51%) reported no trial participation, and 2 (2%) were unsure. The majority (36/55, 65%) of trial participants were in Cohort B. Among 129 patients with TNBC knowledge data, 82 (64%) and 73 (57%) correctly reported their tumor stage and grade, respectively. Most (104/129, 81%) knew TNBC was defined as ER/PR/HER2-negative, but only 16% (21/128) knew the ER/PR-negative cut off was ≤1%. Of 98 patients with risk perception data, 30 (31%) estimated their likelihood of recurrence within the next 5 years as 0%, 60 (61%) between 10-50%, and 8 (8%) between 60-100%. When asked if TNBC patients who remain cancer-free after 3 years will most likely not experience recurrence, 44 (45%) said “True,” 13 (13%) said “False,” and 40 (41%) were unsure. On univariate analysis, trial participation was less likely in Cohort A patients (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.89, P=0.02) and more likely in stage II patients (vs. stage I, OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.09 – 5.39, P=0.03). On multivariable analysis, patients with at least some college education had higher odds of trial participation compared to patients with a college degree or higher (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.11 – 9.28, P=0.03). No associations were found for other factors, including TNBC knowledge. Conclusions: About half of TNBC patients surveyed reported participating in clinical trials. Most of these patients were undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, likely reflective of greater study availability in this setting. While TNBC knowledge was not signif","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract GS03-02: Mammographic surveillance in early breast cancer patients aged 50 years or over: results of the Mammo-50 non-inferiority trial of annual versus less frequent mammography 摘要 GS03-02:50岁或50岁以上早期乳腺癌患者的乳腺X线照相监测:Mammo-50非劣效性试验结果:每年进行乳腺X线照相检查与减少检查次数的比较
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-gs03-02
Janet Dunn, Peter Donnelly, Nada I. Elbeltagi, Andrea Marshall, Alastair Thompson, Riccardo Audisio, Sarah Pinder, David Cameron, Amy Campbell, Sue Hartup, Lesley Turner, Annie Young, Helen B Higgins, Eila Watson, S. Gasson, Peter Barrett-Lee, Claire Hulme, Bethany Shinkins, Peter Hall, Andy Evans
Introduction: Annual surveillance mammograms for an unspecified period, after treatment for early breast cancer, are widely practised in USA and Europe and represent a significant healthcare cost. Current UK guidelines recommend annual mammograms up to 5 years, then reverts to 3 year screening without specified risk stratification. Further evidence is needed to determine the optimum frequency and duration of mammographic surveillance. Methods: A multi-centre, randomised controlled, phase III trial of annual mammography versus 2-yearly for conservation surgery and 3-yearly mammograms for mastectomy patients up to 9 years. Women were eligible if aged 50 years or over at initial diagnosis of breast cancer (invasive or DCIS), and recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery. Primary outcome was breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). Secondary outcomes include recurrence free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS). BCSS event was defined as deaths from breast cancer and RFI as any locoregional or distant invasive recurrence or new breast primary. 5000 women were needed to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority (NI) margin for BCSS with 2.5% one-sided alpha and at least 85% power. Analyses were carried out on intention-to-treat basis. Results: 5235 women were randomised between April 2014 and September 2018. 4347 (83%) women were aged 55-75 years, 4203 (80%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4564 (87%) had invasive disease, 1162 (22%) had node positive disease, 4330 (83%) had ER positive tumours and 3812 (73%) were taking hormone therapy at the time of randomisation. Patient characteristics were balanced across arms. With a median of 5.4 years follow-up (interquartile range 4.6-5.9), 319 women have died; 104 of breast cancer (53 on annual arm; 51 on less frequent arm). BCSS at 5 years was 98.2% (95% CI 97.5-98.6%) on annual arm and 98.3% (95% CI 97.7-98.8%) on less frequent arm. Hazard ratio (HR) was 1.04 (95% CI 0.71 -1.54), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammograms at the 3% margin (NI p< 0.0001; critical value 2.71) and the 1% margin (NI p=0.02; critical value 1.56). 320 (6%) women had a new invasive breast cancer event (55 loco-regional recurrences, 85 new breast primaries, 139 distant recurrences and 41 with multiple invasive events); 164 on the annual arm compared to 156 on the less frequent arm. Five-year RFI was 94.2% (95% CI 93.2-95.1%) for the annual arm and 94.4% (95% CI 93.4-95.3%) for the less frequent arm; HR= 1.03; (95% CI 0.83-1.28) demonstrating non-inferiority at a 2% margin (NI p=0.006; critical value 1.36). OS at 5 years was 94.9% (95% CI 93.9-95.7%) on the annual arm and 94.3% (95% CI 93.3-95.2%) on the less frequent arm. Hazard ratio (HR) was 1.18 (95% CI 0.94 -1.47), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammograms at the 3% margin (NI p=0.003; critical value 1.61) and the 2.5% margin (NI p=0.02; critical value 1.51). A total of 14987 mammograms have been performed on the annual arm and 80
导言:在美国和欧洲,早期乳腺癌患者在接受治疗后,每年都要进行乳房 X 线照相检查,检查时间不明确,这种做法非常普遍,而且需要大量的医疗费用。英国目前的指南建议每年进行一次乳房 X 光检查,最长 5 年,然后恢复到 3 年筛查一次,但不进行特定的风险分层。需要进一步的证据来确定乳房 X 线照相监测的最佳频率和持续时间。方法:一项多中心、随机对照、III 期试验,研究对象为每年进行一次乳房 X 光检查与每 2 年进行一次乳房保护性手术,以及每 3 年进行一次乳房 X 光检查的乳房切除术患者,研究时间长达 9 年。初次诊断为乳腺癌(浸润性或 DCIS)时年龄在 50 岁或以上、治愈手术后 3 年无复发的妇女均符合条件。主要结果是乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)。次要结果包括无复发间隔期(RFI)和总生存期(OS)。BCSS事件定义为乳腺癌死亡,RFI定义为任何局部或远处浸润性复发或新的乳腺癌原发。在2.5%的单侧α和至少85%的功率下,需要5000名妇女才能检测到3%的BCSS绝对非劣效(NI)差值。分析以意向治疗为基础。结果5235名妇女在2014年4月至2018年9月期间接受了随机治疗。4347名(83%)女性年龄在55-75岁之间,4203名(80%)接受过保留手术,4564名(87%)患有浸润性疾病,1162名(22%)患有结节阳性疾病,4330名(83%)患有ER阳性肿瘤,3812名(73%)在随机化时正在接受激素治疗。各组患者特征均衡。中位随访时间为 5.4 年(四分位间范围为 4.6-5.9),共有 319 名妇女死亡,其中 104 人死于乳腺癌(53 人死于年度随访组;51 人死于较少随访组)。5年后的BCSS为:年度组98.2%(95% CI 97.5-98.6%),低频率组98.3%(95% CI 97.7-98.8%)。危险比(HR)为1.04(95% CI 0.71-1.54),表明在3%的临界值(NI p< 0.0001;临界值2.71)和1%的临界值(NI p=0.02;临界值1.56)上,减少乳房X光检查的频率并无劣势。320名(6%)妇女发生了新的浸润性乳腺癌事件(55例局部区域复发、85例新的乳腺原发癌、139例远处复发和41例多次浸润性事件);每年检查一次的妇女有164名,而不太频繁检查的妇女有156名。每年治疗组的五年RFI为94.2%(95% CI 93.2-95.1%),较少治疗组的五年RFI为94.4%(95% CI 93.4-95.3%);HR=1.03;(95% CI 0.83-1.28),在2%的边缘显示出非劣效性(NI p=0.006;临界值1.36)。每年进行一次治疗的治疗组 5 年的 OS 为 94.9% (95% CI 93.9-95.7%),较少进行治疗的治疗组为 94.3% (95% CI 93.3-95.2%)。危险比(HR)为1.18(95% CI 0.94-1.47),表明在3%的临界值(NI p=0.003;临界值1.61)和2.5%的临界值(NI p=0.02;临界值1.51)下,减少乳房X光检查的频率不具劣势。每年进行一次乳房 X 光检查的患者共有 14987 人,不经常进行乳房 X 光检查的患者共有 8047 人。在每年进行一次检查的 2618 名妇女中,有 1967 人(75%)遵守了分配的时间表,而在不太频繁进行检查的 2617 名妇女中,有 1775 人(68%)遵守了分配的时间表。COVID-19大流行影响了患者的依从性;据估计,有345名(7%)妇女在大流行期间错过了乳房X光检查。我们对72%完全按计划进行乳房X光检查的妇女进行了敏感性分析,结果再次证明了BCSS、RFI和OS的NI。结论对于年龄在 50 岁或以上、确诊后 3 年的患者,Mammo-50 证明减少乳房 X 光检查的频率并不比每年进行一次乳房 X 光检查差。这些结果为减少这类患者的乳房X光检查频率提供了证据。引用格式:Janet Dunn、Peter Donnelly、Nada Elbeltagi、Andrea Marshall、Alastair Thompson、Riccardo Audisio、Sarah Pinder、David Cameron、Amy Campbell、Sue Hartup、Lesley Turner、Annie Young、Helen Higgins、Eila Watson、Sophie Gasson、Peter Barrett-Lee、Claire Hulme、Bethany Shinkins、Peter Hall、Andy Evans。50 岁或以上早期乳腺癌患者的乳腺造影监测:Mammo-50 非劣效性试验结果:每年乳腺造影与较少频率乳腺造影对比[摘要]。In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS03-02。
{"title":"Abstract GS03-02: Mammographic surveillance in early breast cancer patients aged 50 years or over: results of the Mammo-50 non-inferiority trial of annual versus less frequent mammography","authors":"Janet Dunn, Peter Donnelly, Nada I. Elbeltagi, Andrea Marshall, Alastair Thompson, Riccardo Audisio, Sarah Pinder, David Cameron, Amy Campbell, Sue Hartup, Lesley Turner, Annie Young, Helen B Higgins, Eila Watson, S. Gasson, Peter Barrett-Lee, Claire Hulme, Bethany Shinkins, Peter Hall, Andy Evans","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-gs03-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-gs03-02","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Introduction:\u0000 Annual surveillance mammograms for an unspecified period, after treatment for early breast cancer, are widely practised in USA and Europe and represent a significant healthcare cost. Current UK guidelines recommend annual mammograms up to 5 years, then reverts to 3 year screening without specified risk stratification. Further evidence is needed to determine the optimum frequency and duration of mammographic surveillance.\u0000 Methods:\u0000 A multi-centre, randomised controlled, phase III trial of annual mammography versus 2-yearly for conservation surgery and 3-yearly mammograms for mastectomy patients up to 9 years. Women were eligible if aged 50 years or over at initial diagnosis of breast cancer (invasive or DCIS), and recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery.\u0000 Primary outcome was breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). Secondary outcomes include recurrence free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS). BCSS event was defined as deaths from breast cancer and RFI as any locoregional or distant invasive recurrence or new breast primary. 5000 women were needed to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority (NI) margin for BCSS with 2.5% one-sided alpha and at least 85% power. Analyses were carried out on intention-to-treat basis.\u0000 Results:\u0000 5235 women were randomised between April 2014 and September 2018. 4347 (83%) women were aged 55-75 years, 4203 (80%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4564 (87%) had invasive disease, 1162 (22%) had node positive disease, 4330 (83%) had ER positive tumours and 3812 (73%) were taking hormone therapy at the time of randomisation. Patient characteristics were balanced across arms.\u0000 With a median of 5.4 years follow-up (interquartile range 4.6-5.9), 319 women have died; 104 of breast cancer (53 on annual arm; 51 on less frequent arm). BCSS at 5 years was 98.2% (95% CI 97.5-98.6%) on annual arm and 98.3% (95% CI 97.7-98.8%) on less frequent arm. Hazard ratio (HR) was 1.04 (95% CI 0.71 -1.54), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammograms at the 3% margin (NI p&lt; 0.0001; critical value 2.71) and the 1% margin (NI p=0.02; critical value 1.56).\u0000 320 (6%) women had a new invasive breast cancer event (55 loco-regional recurrences, 85 new breast primaries, 139 distant recurrences and 41 with multiple invasive events); 164 on the annual arm compared to 156 on the less frequent arm. Five-year RFI was 94.2% (95% CI 93.2-95.1%) for the annual arm and 94.4% (95% CI 93.4-95.3%) for the less frequent arm; HR= 1.03; (95% CI 0.83-1.28) demonstrating non-inferiority at a 2% margin (NI p=0.006; critical value 1.36).\u0000 OS at 5 years was 94.9% (95% CI 93.9-95.7%) on the annual arm and 94.3% (95% CI 93.3-95.2%) on the less frequent arm. Hazard ratio (HR) was 1.18 (95% CI 0.94 -1.47), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammograms at the 3% margin (NI p=0.003; critical value 1.61) and the 2.5% margin (NI p=0.02; critical value 1.51).\u0000 A total of 14987 mammograms have been performed on the annual arm and 80","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PO2-04-07: Efficacy and Safety of First-line Therapy in Patients with HER-2 positive Advanced Breast Cancer:A network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 摘要PO2-04-07:HER-2 阳性晚期乳腺癌患者一线治疗的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的网络 Meta 分析
IF 11.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-04-07
Junxiao Wang, Yushuai Yu, Jie Zhang, Chuangui Song
Background: The numerous but conflicting first-line treatment regimens for Her-2 positive advanced breast cancer necessitate a comprehensive evaluation to inform clinical decision-making. In this study, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of different interventions. Methods: We systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and online abstracts published by ASCO, SABCS. NMA was performed using R software, STATA and Review Manager 5.4 to calculate and analyze the primary endpoint progression free survival (PFS), as well as the secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AE) higher than grade 3. Results: Out of the 8,603 manuscripts retrieved, we included 30 RCTs involving 12,045 patients in our analysis. Regarding PFS, the combination of trastuzumab with TKI was more favorable than dual-target therapy (hazard ratio=0.54, 95% [CI]: 0.40–0.72), and combination chemotherapy was superior to monotherapy (HR=0.66, 0.53-0.83). It is important to note that the addition of anthracycline did not result in improved PFS (HR=1.27, 0.87-1.86). For the HR+HER2+ population, dual-target plus endocrine therapy was more effective than single-target plus endocrine therapy (HR=0.65, 0.53-0.80). Monotherapy combined with dual-target therapy significantly improved OS and ORR compared to monotherapy with single-target therapy (HR=0.69, 0.56-0.84; OR=1.89, 1.34-2.65). A comprehensive analysis of both PFS and AE higher than grade 3 indicated that monotherapy plus dual-target therapy struck a balanced approach between effectiveness and toxicity compared to other regimens. Conclusions: Monotherapy plus dual-target therapy remains the optimal choice among all first-line treatment options for advanced breast cancer. The combination of trastuzumab with TKI demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS, but further data are warranted to confirm the survival benefit. Figure 1. Network diagrams of PFS, OS, ORR and adverse events higher than grade 3 in eligible experimental arms. Figure 2. Forest plot of PFS, OS, ORR and adverse events higher than grade 3 in eligible experimental arms. (A): PFS of HER2+ for experimental arms. (B): PFS of HR+ and HER2+ for experimental arms. (C): OS of HER2+ for experimental arms. (D): ORR of HER2+ for experimental arms. (E): Adverse events higher than grade 3 of HER2+ for experimental arms. Figure 3. Each endpoint ranking for experimental arms. (SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking) (A): PFS ranking for experimental arms. (B): OS ranking for experimental arms. (C): ORR ranking for experimental arms. (D): Adverse events higher than grade 3 ranking for experimental arms. (E): Experimental arms ordered by their overall probability as the best treatment in terms of both efficacy and safety Citation Format: Junxiao Wang, Yushuai Yu, Jie Zhang, Chuangui Song. Efficacy and S
背景:Her-2阳性晚期乳腺癌的一线治疗方案众多,但相互矛盾,因此有必要进行全面评估,为临床决策提供依据。在本研究中,我们进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA),以比较不同干预措施的疗效和安全性。研究方法我们在 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 ASCO、SABCS 发表的在线摘要中系统地搜索了相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 R 软件、STATA 和 Review Manager 5.4 进行 NMA 计算和分析主要终点无进展生存期 (PFS),以及次要终点总生存期 (OS)、客观反应率 (ORR) 和 3 级以上不良事件 (AE)。研究结果在检索到的 8603 篇手稿中,我们将涉及 12045 名患者的 30 项 RCT 纳入分析。关于PFS,曲妥珠单抗与TKI联合治疗比双靶向治疗更有利(危险比=0.54,95% [CI]:0.40-0.72),联合化疗优于单药治疗(HR=0.66,0.53-0.83)。值得注意的是,加用蒽环类药物并未改善PFS(HR=1.27,0.87-1.86)。对于HR+HER2+人群,双靶向加内分泌治疗比单靶向加内分泌治疗更有效(HR=0.65,0.53-0.80)。与单靶向治疗相比,单靶向治疗联合双靶向治疗可显著改善OS和ORR(HR=0.69,0.56-0.84;OR=1.89,1.34-2.65)。对PFS和3级以上AE的综合分析表明,与其他疗法相比,单靶点疗法加双靶点疗法在有效性和毒性之间取得了平衡。结论在晚期乳腺癌的所有一线治疗方案中,单药加双靶向治疗仍是最佳选择。曲妥珠单抗与 TKI 的联合治疗显著改善了患者的 PFS,但还需要更多数据来证实其生存获益。图 1.符合条件的实验组的 PFS、OS、ORR 和高于 3 级的不良事件网络图。图 2.符合条件的实验组的 PFS、OS、ORR 和高于 3 级的不良事件的森林图。(A):实验组 HER2+ 的 PFS。(B):实验组 HR+ 和 HER2+ 的 PFS。(C):实验组 HER2+ 的 OS。(D):实验组 HER2+ 的 ORR。(E):实验组 HER2+ 的 3 级以上不良事件。图 3.实验组各终点排名。(SUCRA,累积排名下的表面)(A):实验臂的 PFS 排名。(B):实验组的 OS 排名。(C):实验组的 ORR 排名。(D):各实验组高于 3 级的不良事件排名。(E):实验组在疗效和安全性方面作为最佳治疗的总体概率排序 引用格式:王俊晓,于玉帅,张杰,宋传贵。HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌患者一线治疗的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验网络Meta分析[摘要]。In:2023年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023年12月5-9日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-04-07.
{"title":"Abstract PO2-04-07: Efficacy and Safety of First-line Therapy in Patients with HER-2 positive Advanced Breast Cancer:A network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Junxiao Wang, Yushuai Yu, Jie Zhang, Chuangui Song","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-04-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-04-07","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Background: The numerous but conflicting first-line treatment regimens for Her-2 positive advanced breast cancer necessitate a comprehensive evaluation to inform clinical decision-making. In this study, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of different interventions.\u0000 Methods: We systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and online abstracts published by ASCO, SABCS. NMA was performed using R software, STATA and Review Manager 5.4 to calculate and analyze the primary endpoint progression free survival (PFS), as well as the secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AE) higher than grade 3.\u0000 Results: Out of the 8,603 manuscripts retrieved, we included 30 RCTs involving 12,045 patients in our analysis. Regarding PFS, the combination of trastuzumab with TKI was more favorable than dual-target therapy (hazard ratio=0.54, 95% [CI]: 0.40–0.72), and combination chemotherapy was superior to monotherapy (HR=0.66, 0.53-0.83). It is important to note that the addition of anthracycline did not result in improved PFS (HR=1.27, 0.87-1.86). For the HR+HER2+ population, dual-target plus endocrine therapy was more effective than single-target plus endocrine therapy (HR=0.65, 0.53-0.80). Monotherapy combined with dual-target therapy significantly improved OS and ORR compared to monotherapy with single-target therapy (HR=0.69, 0.56-0.84; OR=1.89, 1.34-2.65). A comprehensive analysis of both PFS and AE higher than grade 3 indicated that monotherapy plus dual-target therapy struck a balanced approach between effectiveness and toxicity compared to other regimens.\u0000 Conclusions: Monotherapy plus dual-target therapy remains the optimal choice among all first-line treatment options for advanced breast cancer. The combination of trastuzumab with TKI demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS, but further data are warranted to confirm the survival benefit.\u0000 Figure 1. Network diagrams of PFS, OS, ORR and adverse events higher than grade 3 in eligible experimental arms.\u0000 Figure 2. Forest plot of PFS, OS, ORR and adverse events higher than grade 3 in eligible experimental arms.\u0000 (A): PFS of HER2+ for experimental arms. (B): PFS of HR+ and HER2+ for experimental arms. (C): OS of HER2+ for experimental arms. (D): ORR of HER2+ for experimental arms. (E): Adverse events higher than grade 3 of HER2+ for experimental arms.\u0000 Figure 3. Each endpoint ranking for experimental arms. (SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking)\u0000 (A): PFS ranking for experimental arms. (B): OS ranking for experimental arms. (C): ORR ranking for experimental arms. (D): Adverse events higher than grade 3 ranking for experimental arms. (E): Experimental arms ordered by their overall probability as the best treatment in terms of both\u0000 efficacy and safety\u0000 Citation Format: Junxiao Wang, Yushuai Yu, Jie Zhang, Chuangui Song. Efficacy and S","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1