Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.024
Jeffrey W Chen, Simone A Augustinus, Bert A Bonsing, Stefan A W Bouwense, Ignace H J T De Hingh, Casper H Van Eijck, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Tessa E Hendriks, Anton F Engelsman, Marc G Besselink, Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum
Background: Pancreatic resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) may experience a higher complication rate than for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to determine the rate of the novel composite "Ideal Outcome" measure after resection for pNET, using PDAC as reference.
Methods: This observational cohort study included all consecutive patients after pancreatic resection for pNET and PDAC using the nationwide Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2021). The primary outcome was Ideal Outcome; absence of postoperative mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) grade B/C, other major complications, prolonged length of stay, reoperations and readmissions.
Results: In total, 524 pNET and 2851 PDAC resections were included. The rate of Ideal Outcome was lower after resection for pNET (47.7% versus 55.7%; P<0.001) as compared to PDAC. This difference was driven by a lower rate of Ideal Outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for pNET (37.7% versus 56.3%; P<0.001), with no difference after left pancreatectomy (54.5% versus 52.5%; P=0.598). Among the individual components of Ideal Outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy, the largest difference was a four times higher rate of POPF (32.1% versus 7.9%; P<0.001) after resection of pNET.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pNET have a reduced Ideal Outcome rate compared to patients with PDAC, related to a fourfold increased risk of POPF. This highlights the value of pNET-specific patient counseling and the need for effective POPF mitigation strategies.
{"title":"Ideal outcome after pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: a nationwide study.","authors":"Jeffrey W Chen, Simone A Augustinus, Bert A Bonsing, Stefan A W Bouwense, Ignace H J T De Hingh, Casper H Van Eijck, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Tessa E Hendriks, Anton F Engelsman, Marc G Besselink, Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) may experience a higher complication rate than for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to determine the rate of the novel composite \"Ideal Outcome\" measure after resection for pNET, using PDAC as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study included all consecutive patients after pancreatic resection for pNET and PDAC using the nationwide Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2021). The primary outcome was Ideal Outcome; absence of postoperative mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) grade B/C, other major complications, prolonged length of stay, reoperations and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 524 pNET and 2851 PDAC resections were included. The rate of Ideal Outcome was lower after resection for pNET (47.7% versus 55.7%; P<0.001) as compared to PDAC. This difference was driven by a lower rate of Ideal Outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for pNET (37.7% versus 56.3%; P<0.001), with no difference after left pancreatectomy (54.5% versus 52.5%; P=0.598). Among the individual components of Ideal Outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy, the largest difference was a four times higher rate of POPF (32.1% versus 7.9%; P<0.001) after resection of pNET.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pNET have a reduced Ideal Outcome rate compared to patients with PDAC, related to a fourfold increased risk of POPF. This highlights the value of pNET-specific patient counseling and the need for effective POPF mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.023
Fenella Welsh, Senthil Sundaravadanan, Pulkit Sethi, Mohammad Kazeroun, Alessandro Fichera, Irdina Nadziruddin, Sarah J Larkin, Naser Ansari-Pour, Tim Maughan, Michael Brady, Rajarshi Banerjee, Sarah Gooding, Myrddin Rees
Background: The optimal strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is unclear. The Precision1 prospective, observational trial assessed whether pre-operative functional imaging and whole genome sequencing (WGS), could enhance individualized decision-making.
Methods: Patients with CRLM considered for hepatectomy were recruited. In addition to standard staging, patients underwent a quantitative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) scan, to assess liver function. Use of mpMRI to aid surgical decision-making, was prospectively recorded, as were short-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent hepatectomy. In the first 45 patients, WGS was performed on blood and liver tumour samples collected per-operatively.
Results: 95 mpMRI scans were performed in 84 patients, who underwent 87 resections. The mpMRI scan affected surgical decision-making in 41 % (39/95) of scans, with 11 undergoing dual-vein embolization, 16 undergoing more conservative parenchymal-sparing surgery, 11 having more extensive surgery, and one patient following a low calorie diet pre-operatively. There were significant (Clavien-Dindo grades 3/4) complications in 5 % of patients, no Grade C post-hepatectomy liver failure, and zero 90-day mortality. WGS suggested additional therapeutic options and prognostic factors for 22 of 35 (63 %) evaluable patients.
Conclusion: Precision1 shows mpMRI can aid surgical decision-making, and optimise clinical outcomes. WGS provides additional information, to further enhance personalised decision-making.
{"title":"Quantitative liver function imaging and whole genome sequencing - Effective modalities for a new era in personalised decision-making for operable colorectal liver metastases?","authors":"Fenella Welsh, Senthil Sundaravadanan, Pulkit Sethi, Mohammad Kazeroun, Alessandro Fichera, Irdina Nadziruddin, Sarah J Larkin, Naser Ansari-Pour, Tim Maughan, Michael Brady, Rajarshi Banerjee, Sarah Gooding, Myrddin Rees","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is unclear. The Precision1 prospective, observational trial assessed whether pre-operative functional imaging and whole genome sequencing (WGS), could enhance individualized decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CRLM considered for hepatectomy were recruited. In addition to standard staging, patients underwent a quantitative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) scan, to assess liver function. Use of mpMRI to aid surgical decision-making, was prospectively recorded, as were short-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent hepatectomy. In the first 45 patients, WGS was performed on blood and liver tumour samples collected per-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 mpMRI scans were performed in 84 patients, who underwent 87 resections. The mpMRI scan affected surgical decision-making in 41 % (39/95) of scans, with 11 undergoing dual-vein embolization, 16 undergoing more conservative parenchymal-sparing surgery, 11 having more extensive surgery, and one patient following a low calorie diet pre-operatively. There were significant (Clavien-Dindo grades 3/4) complications in 5 % of patients, no Grade C post-hepatectomy liver failure, and zero 90-day mortality. WGS suggested additional therapeutic options and prognostic factors for 22 of 35 (63 %) evaluable patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Precision1 shows mpMRI can aid surgical decision-making, and optimise clinical outcomes. WGS provides additional information, to further enhance personalised decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.022
Rohith Kodali, Utpal Anand, Kunal Parasar, Rajeev N Priyadarshi, Ramesh Kumar, Basant N Singh, Kislay Kant
Background: Our study aimed to compare the clinical presentation and outcomes of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries (BDI) with and without arterial injuries.
Methods: A prospective analysis of 123 patients with post-cholecystectomy BDI between July 2018 and January 2022 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of vascular injuries on perioperative complications and long-term outcomes after delayed repair.
Results: Of 123 patients, 42 (34%) had associated vascular injuries, predominantly right hepatic artery disruptions. These patients experienced significantly higher perioperative complications after the index surgery (Cholangiolar abscess- 83.3% vs 32.1% ( p<0.001), recurrent cholangitis- 66.67 % vs 14.81 % ( p<0.001), blood transfusions ³2 - 89.74 % vs 28.57 % ( p<0.001), hospital admissions ³3 - 3.88 ± 1.99 vs 2.49 ± 0.74 ( p<0.001). Delayed Hepp-Couinaud biliary repair was performed in 112 patients. After a median follow-up, of 2 years, 85 (51.43 % vs. 88.16 % ), 12 (25.71 % vs. 3.89 %), 6 (11.43 % vs. 2.59 %), and 9 (11.43 % vs. 6.49 %) patients had excellent, good, fair, and poor outcomes.
Conclusion: Concomitant vasculobiliary injuries were associated with increased morbidity after index surgery; however, the long-term outcomes following definitive biliary repair remained comparable.
背景:本研究旨在比较胆囊切除术后胆管损伤(BDI)伴和不伴动脉损伤的临床表现和预后。方法:对2018年7月至2022年1月期间123例胆囊切除术后BDI患者进行前瞻性分析。采用多因素logistic回归分析评估血管损伤对围手术期并发症及延迟修复后远期预后的影响。结果:123例患者中,42例(34%)伴有血管损伤,主要是右肝动脉破裂。这些患者在指数手术后出现了更高的围手术期并发症(胆管脓肿- 83.3% vs 32.1%)。结论:指数手术后并发的血管胆道损伤与发病率增加有关;然而,最终胆道修复后的长期结果仍然具有可比性。
{"title":"The impact of vascular injuries on the management of bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy- insights from a prospective study.","authors":"Rohith Kodali, Utpal Anand, Kunal Parasar, Rajeev N Priyadarshi, Ramesh Kumar, Basant N Singh, Kislay Kant","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aimed to compare the clinical presentation and outcomes of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries (BDI) with and without arterial injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective analysis of 123 patients with post-cholecystectomy BDI between July 2018 and January 2022 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of vascular injuries on perioperative complications and long-term outcomes after delayed repair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 123 patients, 42 (34%) had associated vascular injuries, predominantly right hepatic artery disruptions. These patients experienced significantly higher perioperative complications after the index surgery (Cholangiolar abscess- 83.3% vs 32.1% ( p<0.001), recurrent cholangitis- 66.67 % vs 14.81 % ( p<0.001), blood transfusions ³2 - 89.74 % vs 28.57 % ( p<0.001), hospital admissions ³3 - 3.88 ± 1.99 vs 2.49 ± 0.74 ( p<0.001). Delayed Hepp-Couinaud biliary repair was performed in 112 patients. After a median follow-up, of 2 years, 85 (51.43 % vs. 88.16 % ), 12 (25.71 % vs. 3.89 %), 6 (11.43 % vs. 2.59 %), and 9 (11.43 % vs. 6.49 %) patients had excellent, good, fair, and poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concomitant vasculobiliary injuries were associated with increased morbidity after index surgery; however, the long-term outcomes following definitive biliary repair remained comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-04DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.021
Brianna Greenberg, Alexandra W Acher, Alejandro Branes, Rachel Roke, Grace Xu, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin Thorpe, Keying Xu, Paul J Karanicolas
Background: Liver resection increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk due to malignancy-related hyper-coagulopathy and surgical inflammation. Current guidelines recommend early post-operative and extended pharmacologic prophylaxis for all patients but lack stratification by patient or surgical factors. Despite these guidelines, surgeon preferences influence prophylaxis practices. This study aimed to identify clinical factors associated with VTE following liver resection.
Methods: Using data from the Hemorrhage During Liver Resection (HeLiX) trial, a randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing liver resection for cancer, univariate comparisons and logistic regression were performed.
Results: Study cohort VTE incidence was 4.1 %. Multivariable analysis identified major liver resection (odds ratio (OR) 2.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.38-5.03) and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (OR 1.14 per 500 mL increase, 95 % CI 1.03-1.26) as associated with increased risk. Surgical duration (OR 1.14 per hour increase, 95 % CI 0.95-1.34) and use of tranexamic acid (OR 1.77, 95 % CI 0.98-3.27) did not reach statistical significance. VTE rate was highly dependent on extent of resection (1-2 segments, 1.7 %; 3-4 segments, 5.4 %; >4 segments, 6.7 %).
Conclusion: Major resection and increased EBL are associated with higher risk of VTE. These patients may warrant more intensive prophylax compared to those having minor resections with minimal blood loss.
{"title":"Risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy in oncology patients.","authors":"Brianna Greenberg, Alexandra W Acher, Alejandro Branes, Rachel Roke, Grace Xu, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin Thorpe, Keying Xu, Paul J Karanicolas","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver resection increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk due to malignancy-related hyper-coagulopathy and surgical inflammation. Current guidelines recommend early post-operative and extended pharmacologic prophylaxis for all patients but lack stratification by patient or surgical factors. Despite these guidelines, surgeon preferences influence prophylaxis practices. This study aimed to identify clinical factors associated with VTE following liver resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Hemorrhage During Liver Resection (HeLiX) trial, a randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing liver resection for cancer, univariate comparisons and logistic regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study cohort VTE incidence was 4.1 %. Multivariable analysis identified major liver resection (odds ratio (OR) 2.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.38-5.03) and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (OR 1.14 per 500 mL increase, 95 % CI 1.03-1.26) as associated with increased risk. Surgical duration (OR 1.14 per hour increase, 95 % CI 0.95-1.34) and use of tranexamic acid (OR 1.77, 95 % CI 0.98-3.27) did not reach statistical significance. VTE rate was highly dependent on extent of resection (1-2 segments, 1.7 %; 3-4 segments, 5.4 %; >4 segments, 6.7 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Major resection and increased EBL are associated with higher risk of VTE. These patients may warrant more intensive prophylax compared to those having minor resections with minimal blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143074216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S1365-182X(24)02438-9
{"title":"Highlights in this issue","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1365-182X(24)02438-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1365-182X(24)02438-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Page iii"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143102649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.009
Joshua Blum , Lewis Wood , Richard Turner
Importance
Choledocholithiasis is a potentially life-threatening manifestation of acute biliary dysfunction (ABD) often requiring magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for diagnosis when standard investigation findings are inconclusive. Machine learning models (MLMs) may offer alternatives to diagnose choledocholithiasis.
Objective
This systematic review seeks to evaluate the performance of MLMs in predicting choledocholithiasis and to compare this performance with the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines.
Review
This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Four databases were searched for relevant records published between January 2000 and April 2024. Two researchers appraised records. MLM performance and ASGE guideline efficacy were compared, and the clinical utility of MLMs was assessed.
Findings
408 records were screened; eight were eligible. Model accuracy ranged from 19 % to 97 %. Several records demonstrated a moderate-to-high risk of bias; of those featuring low risk of bias, peak accuracies ranged from 70 % to 85 %. Most MLMs outperformed ASGE guidelines. Important predictor variables included age, total bilirubin, and common bile duct diameter.
Conclusions
MLMs outperform ASGE guidelines in predicting choledocholithiasis. Nonetheless, biases in study design and reporting limit their prospective applicability. Current MLMs do not yet rival MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis. Future guideline development should consider MLM-driven insights for better risk prediction.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in the detection of choledocholithiasis: a systematic review","authors":"Joshua Blum , Lewis Wood , Richard Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><div>Choledocholithiasis is a potentially life-threatening manifestation of acute biliary dysfunction (ABD) often requiring magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for diagnosis when standard investigation findings are inconclusive. Machine learning models (MLMs) may offer alternatives to diagnose choledocholithiasis.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review seeks to evaluate the performance of MLMs in predicting choledocholithiasis and to compare this performance with the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Review</h3><div>This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Four databases were searched for relevant records published between January 2000 and April 2024. Two researchers appraised records. MLM performance and ASGE guideline efficacy were compared, and the clinical utility of MLMs was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>408 records were screened; eight were eligible. Model accuracy ranged from 19 % to 97 %. Several records demonstrated a moderate-to-high risk of bias; of those featuring low risk of bias, peak accuracies ranged from 70 % to 85 %. Most MLMs outperformed ASGE guidelines. Important predictor variables included age, total bilirubin, and common bile duct diameter.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MLMs outperform ASGE guidelines in predicting choledocholithiasis. Nonetheless, biases in study design and reporting limit their prospective applicability. Current MLMs do not yet rival MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis. Future guideline development should consider MLM-driven insights for better risk prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.007
Francesca Ratti , Sara Ingallinella , Marco Catena , Diletta Corallino , Rebecca Marino , Luca Aldrighetti
Background
Limited and heterogeneous literature data necessitate a focused examination of the learning curve in robotic liver resections. This study aims to assess the learning curve of two surgeons from the same team with differing laparoscopic backgrounds.
Methods
Since February 2021, San Raffaele Hospital in Milan has implemented a robotic liver surgery program, performing 250 resections by three trained console surgeons. Using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, the learning curve was evaluated for a Pioneer Surgeon (PS) with around 1200 laparoscopic cases and a New Generation Surgeon (NGS) with approximately 100 laparoscopic cases. Cases were stratified by complexity (38 low, 74 intermediate, 85 high).
Results
Both PS and NGS demonstrated a learning curve for operative time after 15 low-complexity and 10 intermediate-complexity cases, with high-complexity learning curves apparent after 10 cases for PS and 18 cases for NGS. Conversion rates remained unaffected, and neither surgeon experienced increased blood loss or postoperative complications. A “team learning curve” effect in terms of operative time emerged after 12 cases, suggesting the importance of a cohesive surgical team.
Conclusion
The robotic platform facilitated a relatively brief learning curve for low and intermediate complexity cases, irrespective of laparoscopic background, underscoring the benefits of team collaboration.
{"title":"Learning curve in robotic liver surgery: easily achievable, evolving from laparoscopic background and team-based","authors":"Francesca Ratti , Sara Ingallinella , Marco Catena , Diletta Corallino , Rebecca Marino , Luca Aldrighetti","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited and heterogeneous literature data necessitate a focused examination of the learning curve in robotic liver resections. This study aims to assess the learning curve of two surgeons from the same team with differing laparoscopic backgrounds.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Since February 2021, San Raffaele Hospital in Milan has implemented a robotic liver surgery program, performing 250 resections by three trained console surgeons. Using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, the learning curve was evaluated for a Pioneer Surgeon (PS) with around 1200 laparoscopic cases and a New Generation Surgeon (NGS) with approximately 100 laparoscopic cases. Cases were stratified by complexity (38 low, 74 intermediate, 85 high).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both PS and NGS demonstrated a learning curve for operative time after 15 low-complexity and 10 intermediate-complexity cases, with high-complexity learning curves apparent after 10 cases for PS and 18 cases for NGS. Conversion rates remained unaffected, and neither surgeon experienced increased blood loss or postoperative complications. A “team learning curve” effect in terms of operative time emerged after 12 cases, suggesting the importance of a cohesive surgical team.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The robotic platform facilitated a relatively brief learning curve for low and intermediate complexity cases, irrespective of laparoscopic background, underscoring the benefits of team collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.010
Edoardo M. Muttillo , Leonardo L. Chiarella , Francesca Ratti , Paolo Magistri , Andrea Belli , Giammauro Berardi , Giuseppe M. Ettorre , Graziano Ceccarelli , Francesco Izzo , Marcello G. Spampinato , Nicola De Angelis , Patrick Pessaux , Tullio Piardi , Fabrizio Di Benedetto , Luca Aldrighetti , Riccardo Memeo
Introduction
Robotic surgery is widely diffused in the surgical field and is becoming increasingly prevalent, however several aspects need more detailed assessment. One of them concerns the role of robotic liver surgery for lesions in contact with major vascular (CMV) pedicles. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare intra and post operative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic liver resections between lesions in contact or free from major vessels.
Methods
A multicentric retrospective study was performed including 1030 patients who underwent robotic liver resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to vascular contact. Intra and post-operative outcomes were compared between the groups before and after Propensity Score Matching.
Results
After propensity score matching 889 patients were included in the study. Among these lesions, 595 were not in contact with major vessels (NCMV) and 294 were in contact with major vessels (CMV). Use of Pringle Manoeuvre was more associated with CMV resections (49.8 % vs 31.2 %, p = 0,0001). No differences in terms of operative time, conversion rate, morbidity and type of complications were observed after PSM.
Conclusion
The presents study shows how robotic surgery is a valid and safe technique also for resection of tumors close to vascular pedicles.
{"title":"Is robotic liver resection feasible in patients with lesions in close proximity to major vessels? A propensity score matching analysis","authors":"Edoardo M. Muttillo , Leonardo L. Chiarella , Francesca Ratti , Paolo Magistri , Andrea Belli , Giammauro Berardi , Giuseppe M. Ettorre , Graziano Ceccarelli , Francesco Izzo , Marcello G. Spampinato , Nicola De Angelis , Patrick Pessaux , Tullio Piardi , Fabrizio Di Benedetto , Luca Aldrighetti , Riccardo Memeo","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Robotic surgery is widely diffused in the surgical field and is becoming increasingly prevalent, however several aspects need more detailed assessment. One of them concerns the role of robotic liver surgery for lesions in contact with major vascular (CMV) pedicles. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare intra and post operative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic liver resections between lesions in contact or free from major vessels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentric retrospective study was performed including 1030 patients who underwent robotic liver resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to vascular contact. Intra and post-operative outcomes were compared between the groups before and after Propensity Score Matching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After propensity score matching 889 patients were included in the study. Among these lesions, 595 were not in contact with major vessels (NCMV) and 294 were in contact with major vessels (CMV). Use of Pringle Manoeuvre was more associated with CMV resections (49.8 % vs 31.2 %, p = 0,0001). No differences in terms of operative time, conversion rate, morbidity and type of complications were observed after PSM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The presents study shows how robotic surgery is a valid and safe technique also for resection of tumors close to vascular pedicles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002
Kareem Sadek, Andrew Shaker, Mary Tice, John A. Stauffer
Background
Limited data exists regarding the safety and outcomes of combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). This study aims to evaluate the combined division technique.
Methods
Patients who underwent LDP for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into the following groups: combined (CV) versus separate (SV) division of the splenic vein; combined (CA) versus separate (SA) division of the splenic artery; and combined (CAV) versus separate (SAV) division of the splenic artery and vein, with or without the pancreatic parenchyma.
Results
Among the 80 patients included, 44 underwent CV and 36 underwent SV. Operative time and major morbidity were significantly lower in CV compared with SV. Similar findings were observed in CAV versus SAV, as well as lower blood loss in CAV. Operative time was significantly lower in CA versus SA. Pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates showed no significant differences between groups. No patient developed splenic arteriovenous fistula in follow-up.
Conclusion
Combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during LDP is safe and associated with improved outcomes compared with separate division.
{"title":"Combined division of the splenic vessels and pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe alternative to separate division: a single-institution retrospective study","authors":"Kareem Sadek, Andrew Shaker, Mary Tice, John A. Stauffer","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited data exists regarding the safety and outcomes of combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). This study aims to evaluate the combined division technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent LDP for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into the following groups: combined (CV) versus separate (SV) division of the splenic vein; combined (CA) versus separate (SA) division of the splenic artery; and combined (CAV) versus separate (SAV) division of the splenic artery and vein, with or without the pancreatic parenchyma.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 80 patients included, 44 underwent CV and 36 underwent SV. Operative time and major morbidity were significantly lower in CV compared with SV. Similar findings were observed in CAV versus SAV, as well as lower blood loss in CAV. Operative time was significantly lower in CA versus SA. Pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates showed no significant differences between groups. No patient developed splenic arteriovenous fistula in follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during LDP is safe and associated with improved outcomes compared with separate division.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 80-86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.011
Ugo Marchese , Xavier Lenne , Gaanan Naveendran , Stylianos Tzedakis , Martin Gaillard , Yasmina Richa , Laurent Boyer , Didier Theis , Amelie Bruandet , Stephanie Truant , David Fuks , Mehdi EL Amrani
Background
The use of 1-year mortality following pancreatectomy for PDAC as a measure of surgical quality has not been evaluated. We aim to i) assess the 1-year mortality rate following pancreatectomy for PDAC, and ii) identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with 1-year mortality.
Methods
Data was extracted retrospectively from the French national medico-administrative database. The study included patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative mortality. Hospitals were classified based on volume (high (≥26 resections/year) and low volume (<26)).
Results
Overall, 17,183 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC were included. The overall 90-day and 1-year mortalities were 6.5 % and 21.5 %, respectively. 1-year mortality varied significantly between low and high-volume hospitals (23.6 % vs. 18.6 %, respectively, p < 0.001). Older age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), readmission, major complications were predictive factors for 1-year mortality. Pancreatectomy in low volume hospitals increased the risk of 1-year mortality by 1.23-fold (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI [1.15–1.32], p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The overall 1-year mortality after pancreatectomy for PDAC was 21.5 %, and was higher in patients of older age, with higher comorbidities, who experienced major complications, and who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Management in high-volume centers decreased mortality rates, regardless of the patient’s condition.
{"title":"Nationwide analysis of one-year mortality following pancreatectomy in 17,183 patients with pancreatic cancer","authors":"Ugo Marchese , Xavier Lenne , Gaanan Naveendran , Stylianos Tzedakis , Martin Gaillard , Yasmina Richa , Laurent Boyer , Didier Theis , Amelie Bruandet , Stephanie Truant , David Fuks , Mehdi EL Amrani","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of 1-year mortality following pancreatectomy for PDAC as a measure of surgical quality has not been evaluated. We aim to i) assess the 1-year mortality rate following pancreatectomy for PDAC, and ii) identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with 1-year mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data was extracted retrospectively from the French national medico-administrative database. The study included patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative mortality. Hospitals were classified based on volume (high (≥26 resections/year) and low volume (<26)).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 17,183 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC were included. The overall 90-day and 1-year mortalities were 6.5 % and 21.5 %, respectively. 1-year mortality varied significantly between low and high-volume hospitals (23.6 % vs. 18.6 %, respectively, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Older age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), readmission, major complications were predictive factors for 1-year mortality. Pancreatectomy in low volume hospitals increased the risk of 1-year mortality by 1.23-fold (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI [1.15–1.32], <em>p</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The overall 1-year mortality after pancreatectomy for PDAC was 21.5 %, and was higher in patients of older age, with higher comorbidities, who experienced major complications, and who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Management in high-volume centers decreased mortality rates, regardless of the patient’s condition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142638824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}