Cancer Medicine最新文献

Background: Highly heterogeneity and inconsistency in terms of prognosis are widely identified for early-stage cervical cancer (esCC). Herein, we aim to investigate for an intuitional risk stratification model for better prognostication and decision-making in combination with clinical and pathological variables.

Methods: We enrolled 2071 CC patients with preoperative biopsy-confirmed and clinically diagnosed with FIGO stage IA-IIA who received radical hysterectomy from 2013 to 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to the training set (n = 1450) and internal validation set (n = 621), in a ratio of 7:3. We used recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to develop a risk stratification model and assessed the ability of discrimination and calibration of the RPA-derived model. The performances of the model were compared with the conventional FIGO 2018 and 9th edition T or N stage classifications.

Results: RPA divided patients into four risk groups with distinct survival: 5-year OS for RPA I to IV were 98%, 95%, 85.5%, and 64.2%, respectively, in training cohort; and 99.5%, 93.2%, 85%, and 68.3% in internal validation cohort (log-rank p < 0.001). Calibration curves confirmed that the RPA-predicted survivals were in good agreement with the actual survivals. The RPA model outperformed the existing staging systems, with highest AUC for OS (training: 0.778 vs. 0.6-0.717; internal validation: 0.772 vs. 0.595-0.704; all p < 0.05), and C-index for OS (training: 0.768 vs. 0.598-0.707; internal validation: 0.741 vs. 0.583-0.676; all p < 0.05). Importantly, there were associations between RPA groups and the efficacy of treatment regimens. No obvious discrepancy was observed among different treatment modalities in RPA I (p = 0.922), whereas significant survival improvements were identified in patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in RPA II-IV (p value were 0.028, 0.036, and 0.024, respectively).

Conclusion: We presented a validated novel clinicopathological risk stratification signature for robust prognostication of esCC, which may be used for streamlining treatment strategies.

Background: Cachexia accounts for about 20% of all cancer-related deaths and indicates poor prognosis. The impact of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), a microbial risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), on the development of cachexia in CRC has not been established.

Methods: We evaluated the association between Fn abundance in pre-surgical stool samples and onset of cachexia at 6 months post-surgery in n = 87 patients with stages I-III CRC in the ColoCare Study.

Results: High fecal Fn abundance compared to negative/low fecal Fn abundance was associated with 4-fold increased risk of cachexia onset at 6 months post-surgery (OR = 4.82, 95% CI = 1.15, 20.10, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that high fecal Fn abundance was associated with an increased risk of cachexia at 6 months post-surgery in CRC patients. This is the first study to link Fn abundance with cachexia in CRC patients, offering novel insights into biological mechanisms and potential management of cancer cachexia. Due to the small sample size, our results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.

Introduction: MGRS are new rare clinical entities, whose recognition and optimal management is evolving.

Methods: To implement real-life data, we retrospectively analysed a multicentre cohort of 60 patients with renal biopsy-proven MGRS receiving mainly novel treatments (between 2006 and 2021) in eight Italian centres. Based on renal biopsy, patients were divided into two subgroups: AL amyloidosis (70%, n = 42) and other-MGRS (30%, n = 18).

Results: Baseline characteristics follow typical manifestations of MGRS disorders in terms of small clonal burden, laboratory and clinical features. More patients with AL amyloidosis had monotypic lambda light-chain disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min and nephrotic proteinuria than other-MGRS group. The most widely used drug was bortezomib, and about one-third of patients underwent ASCT. Overall response rate was 86% with no differences in the two subgroups. However, high-quality hematologic responses ≥very good partial response (VGPR) were greater in AL amyloidosis than in other-MGRS group (67% vs 28%, p = 0.015). The depth of haematological response influenced renal response, obtained in 32 (59%) of evaluable patients, similarly in the subgroups. Indeed, 75% patients with ≥ VGPR (p = 0.049) and none with stable disease (p ≤ 0.001) obtained a renal response. No association between renal response and histotypes (p = 0.9) or type of first-line therapy (p = 0.3) was found. At a median follow-up of 54.4 months (IQR 24.8-102.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 100.1 months (95% CI 34.9-NR), and median overall survival not reached (95% CI 129.8-NR). No significant difference emerged between the two groups in terms of survival outcomes. Achieving ≥ VGPR was confirmed as the main independent predictor of prolonged PFS in the general population (HR = 0.29, p = 0.023) and AL amyloidosis group (HR 0.23; p = 0.023). Preserved renal function at diagnosis was predictive of improved PFS in the AL amyloidosis group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min: HR = 0.003; p = 0.018; eGFR 30-60 mL/min: HR = 0.04, p = 0.046).

Conclusion: Further research is warranted to develop standardised response criteria and treatment strategies to improve MGRS management.

Objectives: The ALINE trial demonstrated the superiority of alectinib over platinum-based chemotherapy in resected Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Considering the high cost of alectinib, this study aimed to evaluate the economic value of alectinib compared to platinum-based chemotherapy for treating early-stage ALK-positive NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.

Materials and methods: We developed a five-state Markov model with monthly cycles to estimate the lifetime costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in terms of cost per LY gained and per QALY gained. Costs were obtained from database, expert opinions and published literature, and utilities were primarily derived from a multicenter cross-sectional study based on the Chinese population. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 5% per year. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty in model results.

Results: Compared to platinum-based chemotherapy, alectinib increased total costs by $16,245 and provided gains of 2.02 LYs and 1.84 QALYs over a lifetime horizon. ICERs were $8,052/LY and $8,806/QALY. The ICER in terms of cost per QALY gained was most sensitive to the outcome discount rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 93% probability of alectinib being cost-effective at a willing-to pay (WTP) threshold of $12,367/QALY (1 GDP per capita), rising to 100% at $37,100/QALY (3 GDP per capita).

Conclusion: Alectinib appears to be the preferred cost-effective option in the adjuvant treatment for Chinese patients with resected early-stage ALK-positive NSCLC.