Objective: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may be associated with cardiovascular disease. Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a recently updated measure of cardiovascular health (CVH), has been investigated for its association with SUI in women.
Methods: The study adopted a cross-sectional design with national scope, incorporating 9332 women aged 20 and above, selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset from 2005 to 2018. The LE8 metric, which varies from 0 to 100, was evaluated based on the criteria set by the American Heart Association. SUI was determined based on self-report. To evaluate these correlations, we employed models with multivariable logistic variables and a restricted cubic spline.
Results: In the cross-sectional study, a total of 9332 participants were included (weighted average age, 52.23 years), and 4274 had SUI (weighted percentage, 48.64%). Considering potential confounders, it was found that higher LE8 scores were associated with lower odds of SUI (odds ratio [OR] for each 10-point increase was 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.87). Compared to participants with lower LE8 scores, those with higher LE8 scores had a 57% lower probability of developing SUI. There was a statistically significant association between LE8 score and SUI among participants who were middle-aged, non-Hispanic white, had higher levels of education and income, and were living with a partner.
Conclusion: According to this study, there was an association between increase in Life's Essential 8 and reduction in SUI risk. Therefore, promoting optimal CVH may associate with reducing SUI in women.
{"title":"Association between Life's essential 8 and stress urinary incontinence in women from the National Health and nutrition examination survey 2005-2018: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Xiaoping Xu, Han Wu, Xiaofang Xu, Ruiqian Liu","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15873","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may be associated with cardiovascular disease. Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a recently updated measure of cardiovascular health (CVH), has been investigated for its association with SUI in women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study adopted a cross-sectional design with national scope, incorporating 9332 women aged 20 and above, selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset from 2005 to 2018. The LE8 metric, which varies from 0 to 100, was evaluated based on the criteria set by the American Heart Association. SUI was determined based on self-report. To evaluate these correlations, we employed models with multivariable logistic variables and a restricted cubic spline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the cross-sectional study, a total of 9332 participants were included (weighted average age, 52.23 years), and 4274 had SUI (weighted percentage, 48.64%). Considering potential confounders, it was found that higher LE8 scores were associated with lower odds of SUI (odds ratio [OR] for each 10-point increase was 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.87). Compared to participants with lower LE8 scores, those with higher LE8 scores had a 57% lower probability of developing SUI. There was a statistically significant association between LE8 score and SUI among participants who were middle-aged, non-Hispanic white, had higher levels of education and income, and were living with a partner.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to this study, there was an association between increase in Life's Essential 8 and reduction in SUI risk. Therefore, promoting optimal CVH may associate with reducing SUI in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ambre-Marie Bomal, Marie-Charlotte Faurant, Hady El Hachem, Bruno Vielle, Philippe Gillard, Sébastien Madzou, Florence Biquard, Guillaume Legendre, Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet
Objective: This study aimed to assess whether a partial term prelabor rupture of membranes (partial TPROM) had an impact on the spontaneous onset of labor compared to complete TPROM.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study in a French level III maternity hospital. We included all singleton cephalic pregnancies presenting with prelabor rupture of membranes ≥37 weeks gestational age. Patients with a partial TPROM (P group) were compared to patients with a complete TPROM (C group). Induction of labor was performed following expectative management of 24-48 h, and antibiotic prophylaxis was started 12 h after rupture. Our main outcome measure was the rate of patients who had spontaneous labor 24 h following prelabor rupture.
Results: Overall, 389 women were included in the study, 148 in the P group, 241 in the C group. The proportion of women who went into spontaneous labor in the 24 h following TPROM was significantly lower in the P group (45% vs 64%, P < 0.001). A partial TPROM was a predictive factor for absence of labor at 24 h following rupture (adjusted odds ratio: 0.44 [0.29-0.68]). There were more cases of induction of labor (50% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and antibiotic prophylaxis (91% vs 73%, P < 0.001) in the P group. However, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion: Compared to complete TPROM, partial TPROM is associated with a lower probability of spontaneous labor in the 24 h following rupture. The persistence of a residual membrane has been identified as a risk factor for delaying labor beyond 24 h.
{"title":"Impact of partial prelabor rupture of membranes at term on labor and on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective case-control study.","authors":"Ambre-Marie Bomal, Marie-Charlotte Faurant, Hady El Hachem, Bruno Vielle, Philippe Gillard, Sébastien Madzou, Florence Biquard, Guillaume Legendre, Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15851","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess whether a partial term prelabor rupture of membranes (partial TPROM) had an impact on the spontaneous onset of labor compared to complete TPROM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study in a French level III maternity hospital. We included all singleton cephalic pregnancies presenting with prelabor rupture of membranes ≥37 weeks gestational age. Patients with a partial TPROM (P group) were compared to patients with a complete TPROM (C group). Induction of labor was performed following expectative management of 24-48 h, and antibiotic prophylaxis was started 12 h after rupture. Our main outcome measure was the rate of patients who had spontaneous labor 24 h following prelabor rupture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 389 women were included in the study, 148 in the P group, 241 in the C group. The proportion of women who went into spontaneous labor in the 24 h following TPROM was significantly lower in the P group (45% vs 64%, P < 0.001). A partial TPROM was a predictive factor for absence of labor at 24 h following rupture (adjusted odds ratio: 0.44 [0.29-0.68]). There were more cases of induction of labor (50% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and antibiotic prophylaxis (91% vs 73%, P < 0.001) in the P group. However, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to complete TPROM, partial TPROM is associated with a lower probability of spontaneous labor in the 24 h following rupture. The persistence of a residual membrane has been identified as a risk factor for delaying labor beyond 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew Spiers, Horace Roman, Megan Wasson, Charles Chapron, Pascal Rousset, François Golfier, Raffaele Fauvet, Léa Delbos, Mathieu Poilblanc, Vincent Lavoué, Erick Petit, Frédérique Perotte, Mikhael Benjoar, Cherif Akladios, Benjamin Merlot, Thomas Dennis, Anne Sophie Boudy, Benjamin Fedida, Pierre Leguevaque, Ludivine Genre, Clothilde Hennetier, Morgane Perrin, Patrice Crochet, Nicolas Lucas, Claire-Marie Roger, Elodie Chantalat, Pierre Collinet, Hervé Fernandez, Philippe Descamps, Sofiane Bendifallah
Endometriosis is a complex gynecologic disorder characterized primarily by symptoms of pelvic pain, infertility, and altered quality of life. National and international guidelines highlight the diagnostic difficulties and lack of conclusive diagnostic tools for endometriosis. Furthermore, guidelines are becoming questionable at an increasingly rapid rate as new diagnostic techniques emerge. This work aims to provide a knowledge synthesis of the relevance of various diagnostic tools and to assess areas of improvement of conventional algorithms. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2021 to December 2023 using relevant key words. Articles evaluating the diagnostic relevance and performance of various tools were included and independently reviewed by the authors for eligibility. Included studies were assessed using the GRADE and QUADAS-2 tools. Of the 4204 retrieved articles, 26 were included. While anamnesis and clinical examination do contribute to diagnostic accuracy, their level of evidence and impact on the diagnostic process remains limited. Although imaging techniques are recommended to investigate endometriosis, ultrasonography remains highly operator dependent. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to exhibit higher sensitivities than ultrasound. However, concerns persist with regards to the terminology, anatomical definition of lesions, and accuracies of both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, several biological markers have been studied and cumulative evidence supports the contribution of noncoding RNAs to the diagnosis of endometriosis. Marginal improvements have been suggested for anamnesis, clinical examination, and imaging examinations. Conversely, some biomarkers, including the saliva microRNA signature for endometriosis, have emerged as diagnostic tools which inspire reflection on the revision of conventional diagnostic algorithms.
{"title":"Clues to revising the conventional diagnostic algorithm for endometriosis.","authors":"Andrew Spiers, Horace Roman, Megan Wasson, Charles Chapron, Pascal Rousset, François Golfier, Raffaele Fauvet, Léa Delbos, Mathieu Poilblanc, Vincent Lavoué, Erick Petit, Frédérique Perotte, Mikhael Benjoar, Cherif Akladios, Benjamin Merlot, Thomas Dennis, Anne Sophie Boudy, Benjamin Fedida, Pierre Leguevaque, Ludivine Genre, Clothilde Hennetier, Morgane Perrin, Patrice Crochet, Nicolas Lucas, Claire-Marie Roger, Elodie Chantalat, Pierre Collinet, Hervé Fernandez, Philippe Descamps, Sofiane Bendifallah","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometriosis is a complex gynecologic disorder characterized primarily by symptoms of pelvic pain, infertility, and altered quality of life. National and international guidelines highlight the diagnostic difficulties and lack of conclusive diagnostic tools for endometriosis. Furthermore, guidelines are becoming questionable at an increasingly rapid rate as new diagnostic techniques emerge. This work aims to provide a knowledge synthesis of the relevance of various diagnostic tools and to assess areas of improvement of conventional algorithms. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2021 to December 2023 using relevant key words. Articles evaluating the diagnostic relevance and performance of various tools were included and independently reviewed by the authors for eligibility. Included studies were assessed using the GRADE and QUADAS-2 tools. Of the 4204 retrieved articles, 26 were included. While anamnesis and clinical examination do contribute to diagnostic accuracy, their level of evidence and impact on the diagnostic process remains limited. Although imaging techniques are recommended to investigate endometriosis, ultrasonography remains highly operator dependent. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to exhibit higher sensitivities than ultrasound. However, concerns persist with regards to the terminology, anatomical definition of lesions, and accuracies of both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, several biological markers have been studied and cumulative evidence supports the contribution of noncoding RNAs to the diagnosis of endometriosis. Marginal improvements have been suggested for anamnesis, clinical examination, and imaging examinations. Conversely, some biomarkers, including the saliva microRNA signature for endometriosis, have emerged as diagnostic tools which inspire reflection on the revision of conventional diagnostic algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lee Reicher, Guy Lutsker, Nadav Michaan, Dan Grisaru, Ido Laskov
Gynecologic cancer requires personalized care to improve outcomes. Large language models (LLMs) hold the potential to provide intelligent question-answering with reliable information about medical queries in clear and plain English, which can be understood by both healthcare providers and patients. We aimed to evaluate two freely available LLMs (ChatGPT and Google's Bard) in answering questions regarding the management of gynecologic cancer. The LLMs' performances were evaluated by developing a set questions that addressed common gynecologic oncologic findings from a patient's perspective and more complex questions to elicit recommendations from a clinician's perspective. Each question was presented to the LLM interface, and the responses generated by the artificial intelligence (AI) model were recorded. The responses were assessed based on the adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society of Gynecological Oncology guidelines. This evaluation aimed to determine the accuracy and appropriateness of the information provided by LLMs. We showed that the models provided largely appropriate responses to questions regarding common cervical cancer screening tests and BRCA-related questions. Less useful answers were received to complex and controversial gynecologic oncology cases, as assessed by reviewing the common guidelines. ChatGPT and Bard lacked knowledge of regional guideline variations, However, it provided practical and multifaceted advice to patients and caregivers regarding the next steps of management and follow up. We conclude that LLMs may have a role as an adjunct informational tool to improve outcomes.
{"title":"Exploring the role of artificial intelligence, large language models: Comparing patient-focused information and clinical decision support capabilities to the gynecologic oncology guidelines.","authors":"Lee Reicher, Guy Lutsker, Nadav Michaan, Dan Grisaru, Ido Laskov","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15869","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gynecologic cancer requires personalized care to improve outcomes. Large language models (LLMs) hold the potential to provide intelligent question-answering with reliable information about medical queries in clear and plain English, which can be understood by both healthcare providers and patients. We aimed to evaluate two freely available LLMs (ChatGPT and Google's Bard) in answering questions regarding the management of gynecologic cancer. The LLMs' performances were evaluated by developing a set questions that addressed common gynecologic oncologic findings from a patient's perspective and more complex questions to elicit recommendations from a clinician's perspective. Each question was presented to the LLM interface, and the responses generated by the artificial intelligence (AI) model were recorded. The responses were assessed based on the adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society of Gynecological Oncology guidelines. This evaluation aimed to determine the accuracy and appropriateness of the information provided by LLMs. We showed that the models provided largely appropriate responses to questions regarding common cervical cancer screening tests and BRCA-related questions. Less useful answers were received to complex and controversial gynecologic oncology cases, as assessed by reviewing the common guidelines. ChatGPT and Bard lacked knowledge of regional guideline variations, However, it provided practical and multifaceted advice to patients and caregivers regarding the next steps of management and follow up. We conclude that LLMs may have a role as an adjunct informational tool to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Hill, Antoine Moreau, Ludovic Martin, Justin Papin-Groseil
Objective: To determine the number of sessions required using procedural simulation to acquire the skill of vaginal examination, which is an essential part of obstetrics, but a difficult learned skill.
Methods: Using a high-fidelity simulator, we conducted a prospective, single-center, single-blind study, at the Angers School of Midwifery. A class of students completed a theory course, and took part in three simulation sessions. During the simulation sessions, each student was asked to describe five different cervixes, under five criteria: position, length, consistency, dilation, and head station. Each participant received individual feedback as part of a debrief session, after completing their description. A pass rate of 80% was set for the entire class.
Results: Twenty-six students participated. The class achieved a mean score of 70.77 ± 10.23% in the first session, 81.85 ± 9.91% in the second session, and 81.23 ± 8.63% in the third session. There was a significant improvement only between the first and second sessions (P < 0.001). Of the 26 participants, 6 (23%) scored over 80% in the first session, 17 participants (65%) scored above 80% in the first two sessions, and 21 participants (80%) scored above 80% over the three sessions.
Conclusion: Learning vaginal examination by procedural simulation with the aid of a high-fidelity simulator, and receiving individual feedback and debrief, resulted in an 80% pass rate in two practical sessions, working to describe 10 cervixes.
{"title":"A prospective study of the acquisition of vaginal examination skills using simulation.","authors":"Emma Hill, Antoine Moreau, Ludovic Martin, Justin Papin-Groseil","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the number of sessions required using procedural simulation to acquire the skill of vaginal examination, which is an essential part of obstetrics, but a difficult learned skill.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a high-fidelity simulator, we conducted a prospective, single-center, single-blind study, at the Angers School of Midwifery. A class of students completed a theory course, and took part in three simulation sessions. During the simulation sessions, each student was asked to describe five different cervixes, under five criteria: position, length, consistency, dilation, and head station. Each participant received individual feedback as part of a debrief session, after completing their description. A pass rate of 80% was set for the entire class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six students participated. The class achieved a mean score of 70.77 ± 10.23% in the first session, 81.85 ± 9.91% in the second session, and 81.23 ± 8.63% in the third session. There was a significant improvement only between the first and second sessions (P < 0.001). Of the 26 participants, 6 (23%) scored over 80% in the first session, 17 participants (65%) scored above 80% in the first two sessions, and 21 participants (80%) scored above 80% over the three sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Learning vaginal examination by procedural simulation with the aid of a high-fidelity simulator, and receiving individual feedback and debrief, resulted in an 80% pass rate in two practical sessions, working to describe 10 cervixes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Miren Arrue Gabilondo, Maria J Belar, Irene Diez-Itza
Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the association between de novo urethral hypermobility 6 months postpartum and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms at 6 months and 12 years after first delivery. Risk factors associated with the development of postnatal urethral hypermobility were also examined.
Methods: A longitudinal cohort study was conducted on primigravid women, after excluding those with UI before pregnancy and/or urethral hypermobility (rotational angle ≥30°) at term. At 6 months postpartum, SUI was assessed based on symptoms and introital ultrasound performed to measure rotational angle (difference between urethro-pelvic angle at rest and at maximum Valsalva). Twelve years after delivery, women were sent a questionnaire including SUI assessment and questions on parity, current age, and body mass index. Continuous variables were compared using student's t-test and qualitative variables using chi-squared tests. A logistic regression model was constructed including variables that reached statistical significance (P < 0.05) in the univariate analysis.
Results: Of the 314 women who completed the 6-month follow-up, 265 (84.4%) were successfully contacted and completed the questionnaire at 12 years and these formed the study group. In 127 women (47.9%), de novo urethral hypermobility had developed by 6 months postpartum. There was no association between urethral hypermobility and SUI symptoms 6 months postpartum (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.59-2.33). Twelve years after delivery, however, SUI was reported by 110 women overall (41.5%) and nearly half of the women who developed postnatal urethral hypermobility (61/127, 48.0%).
Conclusion: De novo urethral hypermobility 6 months postpartum constitutes a risk factor for SUI 12 years later.
研究目的该研究旨在分析产后6个月尿道过度活动与首次分娩后6个月和12年的压力性尿失禁(SUI)症状之间的关系。此外,还研究了与产后尿道过度活动相关的风险因素:方法:对初产妇进行了一项纵向队列研究,在排除了孕前患有尿失禁和/或临产时患有尿道过度活动症(旋转角度≥30°)的初产妇之后。产后 6 个月时,根据症状对 SUI 进行评估,并进行肛门超声波检查以测量旋转角度(静止时和最大 Valsalva 运动时尿道盆腔角度之差)。产后 12 年后,妇女们收到了一份调查问卷,其中包括 SUI 评估以及关于胎次、当前年龄和体重指数的问题。连续变量的比较采用学生 t 检验,定性变量的比较采用卡方检验。建立的逻辑回归模型包括了达到统计学显著性(P 结果)的变量:在完成 6 个月随访的 314 名妇女中,有 265 人(84.4%)在 12 年时成功联系并完成了问卷调查,这些妇女组成了研究组。127名妇女(47.9%)在产后6个月时出现了新的尿道下裂。产后 6 个月尿道过度活动与 SUI 症状之间没有关联(OR:1.17;95% CI:0.59-2.33)。然而,产后 12 年后,110 名妇女(41.5%)报告出现 SUI,近一半的妇女在产后出现尿道过度活动(61/127,48.0%):结论:产后 6 个月出现尿道过度活动是 12 年后发生 SUI 的风险因素。
{"title":"De novo urethral hypermobility at 6 months after first delivery as a risk factor for stress urinary incontinence 12 years postpartum.","authors":"Miren Arrue Gabilondo, Maria J Belar, Irene Diez-Itza","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15864","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15864","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to analyze the association between de novo urethral hypermobility 6 months postpartum and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms at 6 months and 12 years after first delivery. Risk factors associated with the development of postnatal urethral hypermobility were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal cohort study was conducted on primigravid women, after excluding those with UI before pregnancy and/or urethral hypermobility (rotational angle ≥30°) at term. At 6 months postpartum, SUI was assessed based on symptoms and introital ultrasound performed to measure rotational angle (difference between urethro-pelvic angle at rest and at maximum Valsalva). Twelve years after delivery, women were sent a questionnaire including SUI assessment and questions on parity, current age, and body mass index. Continuous variables were compared using student's t-test and qualitative variables using chi-squared tests. A logistic regression model was constructed including variables that reached statistical significance (P < 0.05) in the univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 314 women who completed the 6-month follow-up, 265 (84.4%) were successfully contacted and completed the questionnaire at 12 years and these formed the study group. In 127 women (47.9%), de novo urethral hypermobility had developed by 6 months postpartum. There was no association between urethral hypermobility and SUI symptoms 6 months postpartum (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.59-2.33). Twelve years after delivery, however, SUI was reported by 110 women overall (41.5%) and nearly half of the women who developed postnatal urethral hypermobility (61/127, 48.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>De novo urethral hypermobility 6 months postpartum constitutes a risk factor for SUI 12 years later.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To determine the value of the Aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) in predicting admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and chorioamnionitis.
Methods: The present retrospective cohort study with pregnant women who were diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in the Department of Perinatology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between January 1, 2021, and June 1, 2023 (n = 357). The patients were categorized into subgroups: (1) cases with (n = 27) or without (n = 330) chorioamnionitis, (2) admission (n = 182) or no admission (n = 175) to NICU; (3) gestational age at birth <28 weeks or 28 weeks or longer; and (4) gestational age at birth <34 weeks or 34 weeks or longer. AISI values were compared between the subgroups, and cut-off values for AISI were determined to predict adverse outcomes.
Results: AISI values were significantly higher in the admission to NICU group compared with the no admission to NICU group (707.0 vs 551.2) (P < 0.05). AISI values were also significantly higher in the chorioamnionitis group compared with those without chorioamnionitis (850.3 vs 609.4) (P < 0.05). AISI levels were significantly higher in cases delivered before 28 weeks of gestation compared with the cases delivered at 28 weeks of gestation or later (945.6 vs 604.9) (P < 0.05), and were also significantly higher in cases delivered before 34 weeks of gestation compared with the cases delivered at 34 weeks of gestation or later (715.5 vs 550.1) (P < 0.05). Optimal cut-off values of AISI were found to be 626.19 (74.1% sensitivity, 52.8% specificity), 506.09 (68.9% sensitivity and, 47.7% specificity), and 555.1 (69.8% sensitivity, 48.1% specificity) in predicting NICU admission, chorioamnionitis, and delivery before 28 weeks, respectively.
Conclusion: The novel inflammatory marker AISI may be used in the prediction of chorioamnionitis and NICU admission in PPROM cases.
Synopsis: Aggregate index of systemic inflammation may be used as a novel marker in predicting high-risk for chorioamnionitis and neonatal intensive care unit admission in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
{"title":"Aggregate index of systemic inflammation: A novel systemic inflammatory index for prediction of neonatal outcomes and chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes.","authors":"Eda Ozden Tokalioglu, Atakan Tanacan, Merve Ozturk Agaoglu, Ülkü Gürbüz Özbebek, Gülcan Okutucu, Hüseyin Kayaalp, Petek Uzuner, Dilek Sahin","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15868","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the value of the Aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) in predicting admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and chorioamnionitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present retrospective cohort study with pregnant women who were diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in the Department of Perinatology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between January 1, 2021, and June 1, 2023 (n = 357). The patients were categorized into subgroups: (1) cases with (n = 27) or without (n = 330) chorioamnionitis, (2) admission (n = 182) or no admission (n = 175) to NICU; (3) gestational age at birth <28 weeks or 28 weeks or longer; and (4) gestational age at birth <34 weeks or 34 weeks or longer. AISI values were compared between the subgroups, and cut-off values for AISI were determined to predict adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AISI values were significantly higher in the admission to NICU group compared with the no admission to NICU group (707.0 vs 551.2) (P < 0.05). AISI values were also significantly higher in the chorioamnionitis group compared with those without chorioamnionitis (850.3 vs 609.4) (P < 0.05). AISI levels were significantly higher in cases delivered before 28 weeks of gestation compared with the cases delivered at 28 weeks of gestation or later (945.6 vs 604.9) (P < 0.05), and were also significantly higher in cases delivered before 34 weeks of gestation compared with the cases delivered at 34 weeks of gestation or later (715.5 vs 550.1) (P < 0.05). Optimal cut-off values of AISI were found to be 626.19 (74.1% sensitivity, 52.8% specificity), 506.09 (68.9% sensitivity and, 47.7% specificity), and 555.1 (69.8% sensitivity, 48.1% specificity) in predicting NICU admission, chorioamnionitis, and delivery before 28 weeks, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel inflammatory marker AISI may be used in the prediction of chorioamnionitis and NICU admission in PPROM cases.</p><p><strong>Synopsis: </strong>Aggregate index of systemic inflammation may be used as a novel marker in predicting high-risk for chorioamnionitis and neonatal intensive care unit admission in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Laparoscopic excision of a large 25 cm adnexal mass with ovarian preservation while minimizing spillage.","authors":"Saboohi Tariq, Parijot Kumar, Fadi-Tamas Salameh","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15862","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141995717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To analyze the knowledge of ChatGPT about cervical cancer (CC).
Methods: Official websites of professional health institutes, and websites created by patients and charities underwent strict screening. Using CC-related keywords, common inquiries by the public and comments about CC were searched in social media applications with these data, a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) was prepared. When preparing question about CC, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and European Society of Pathology (ESP) guidelines were used. The answers given by ChatGPT were scored according to the Global Quality Score (GQS).
Results: When all ChatGPT answers to FAQs about CC were evaluated with regard to GQS, 68 ChatGPT answers were classified as score 5, and none of ChatGPT answers for FAQs were scored as 2 or 1. Moreover, ChatGPT answered 33 of 53 (62.3%) CC-related questions based on ESGO, ESTRO, and ESP guidelines with completely accurate and satisfactory responses (GQS 5). In addition, eight answers (15.1%), seven answers (13.2%), four answers (7.5%), and one answer (1.9%) were categorized as GQS 4, GQS 3, GQS 2, and GQS 1, respectively. The reproducibility rate of ChatGPT answers about CC-related FAQs and responses about those guideline-based questions was 93.2% and 88.7%, respectively.
Conclusion: ChatGPT had an accurate and satisfactory response rate for FAQs about CC with regards to GQS. However, the accuracy and quality of ChatGPT answers significantly decreased for questions based on guidelines.
{"title":"Analyzing the performance of ChatGPT in answering inquiries about cervical cancer.","authors":"Engin Yurtcu, Seyfettin Ozvural, Betul Keyif","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15861","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the knowledge of ChatGPT about cervical cancer (CC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Official websites of professional health institutes, and websites created by patients and charities underwent strict screening. Using CC-related keywords, common inquiries by the public and comments about CC were searched in social media applications with these data, a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) was prepared. When preparing question about CC, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and European Society of Pathology (ESP) guidelines were used. The answers given by ChatGPT were scored according to the Global Quality Score (GQS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When all ChatGPT answers to FAQs about CC were evaluated with regard to GQS, 68 ChatGPT answers were classified as score 5, and none of ChatGPT answers for FAQs were scored as 2 or 1. Moreover, ChatGPT answered 33 of 53 (62.3%) CC-related questions based on ESGO, ESTRO, and ESP guidelines with completely accurate and satisfactory responses (GQS 5). In addition, eight answers (15.1%), seven answers (13.2%), four answers (7.5%), and one answer (1.9%) were categorized as GQS 4, GQS 3, GQS 2, and GQS 1, respectively. The reproducibility rate of ChatGPT answers about CC-related FAQs and responses about those guideline-based questions was 93.2% and 88.7%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT had an accurate and satisfactory response rate for FAQs about CC with regards to GQS. However, the accuracy and quality of ChatGPT answers significantly decreased for questions based on guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response: Pharmacological treatment of ectopic pregnancy: Accuracy, safety and cost-effectiveness of day 1-7 β-hCG measurements.","authors":"Adi Dayan-Schwartz","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15866","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}