首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agricultural Economics最新文献

英文 中文
Wolves' contribution to structural change in grazing systems among swiss alpine summer farms: The evidence from causal random forest 狼对瑞士高山夏季农场放牧系统结构变化的贡献:来自因果随机森林的证据
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-08 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12540
Steffen Mink, Daria Loginova, Stefan Mann

The return of wolves to Swiss mountains and the damage they cause to sheep and goat herds in the region have raised concerns about a consequent wave of farm closures. In this paper, we examine the relationship between wolf attacks and the decline of Alpine summer farms, a specific high-altitude farm type. We collected farm structure data and monitoring data on wolf attacks between 2004 and 2021 and analysed them using a causal random forest method, enabling a detailed analysis of the relation between wolf attacks and the number of different types of Alpine summer farms at a regional level. The results show that the farming systems are unaffected by incidental and infrequent wolf attacks, but that a high number of wolf attacks in a region is related to faster decrease in number of grazing systems where sheep are most vulnerable to such attacks. In contrast, systems that allow for better herd protection tend to show an increase in areas with frequent wolf attacks.

狼群重返瑞士山区以及它们对该地区绵羊和山羊造成的破坏引发了人们对随之而来的农场关闭潮的担忧。在本文中,我们研究了狼群袭击与阿尔卑斯夏季农场(一种特殊的高海拔农场类型)衰退之间的关系。我们收集了 2004 年至 2021 年期间的农场结构数据和狼群袭击监测数据,并使用因果随机森林方法对其进行了分析,从而在区域层面上详细分析了狼群袭击与不同类型的阿尔卑斯夏季农场数量之间的关系。结果表明,养殖系统不受偶然和不经常发生的狼群袭击的影响,但一个地区狼群袭击次数多,则羊群最容易受到袭击的放牧系统数量减少得更快。与此相反,能够更好地保护羊群的放牧系统往往会增加狼群频繁袭击的地区。
{"title":"Wolves' contribution to structural change in grazing systems among swiss alpine summer farms: The evidence from causal random forest","authors":"Steffen Mink,&nbsp;Daria Loginova,&nbsp;Stefan Mann","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12540","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12540","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The return of wolves to Swiss mountains and the damage they cause to sheep and goat herds in the region have raised concerns about a consequent wave of farm closures. In this paper, we examine the relationship between wolf attacks and the decline of Alpine summer farms, a specific high-altitude farm type. We collected farm structure data and monitoring data on wolf attacks between 2004 and 2021 and analysed them using a causal random forest method, enabling a detailed analysis of the relation between wolf attacks and the number of different types of Alpine summer farms at a regional level. The results show that the farming systems are unaffected by incidental and infrequent wolf attacks, but that a high number of wolf attacks in a region is related to faster decrease in number of grazing systems where sheep are most vulnerable to such attacks. In contrast, systems that allow for better herd protection tend to show an increase in areas with frequent wolf attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"75 1","pages":"201-217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12540","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42558248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Migrant remittances, agriculture investment and cropping patterns 移民汇款、农业投资和种植模式
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12526
Ubaid Ali, Mazhar Mughal, Lionel de Boisdeffre

We investigate how the receipt and amount of domestic or international transfers influences household decisions regarding farm investment and the selection of capital and labour-intensive crops. We argue that, even though recipient households may use additional income to increase agricultural investment, investment can fall in the short run if labour constraints arising from the migrant member's absence are binding and capital accumulation is suboptimal. Employing a set of endogenous treatment estimates, we test this hypothesis on data from 5636 rural households in Pakistan. Our findings show a substantial difference between recipient and non-recipient households in terms of their economic behaviour. Recipient households make 100% less agricultural investment and generate 82% less production compared to non-recipient households. The estimates are found to be robust when tested with alternate empirical techniques (Heckman Selection and matching). The impact is stronger in the case of households that receive domestic transfers, with 100% less farm investment and 77% less production than non-recipient households. Remittances result in a decrease in production of both capital- and labour-intensive crops, reflecting a decline in overall farm activity. Similar farm investment and cropping patterns are observed relative to the amount of remittances received. The results are robust to different model specifications and estimation procedures.

本研究调查了国内或国际转移的接收和数量如何影响家庭关于农业投资和资本和劳动密集型作物选择的决策。我们开发了一个概念框架来假设,即使接收家庭可能有可能利用额外的收入来提高农业投资,如果移民成员缺席引起的劳动力约束具有约束力,并且资本积累不是最优的,那么短期内投资就会下降。采用一组内生处理估计,我们对来自巴基斯坦的5636个农村家庭的数据进行了实证检验。我们的研究结果表明,在经济行为方面,接受者和非接受者家庭之间存在巨大差异。与非受助家庭相比,受助家庭的农业投资减少99.64%,产量减少82%。当用赫克曼选择和匹配替代经验技术进行测试时,发现估计是稳健的。接受国内转移支付的家庭受到的影响更大,与未接受国内转移支付的家庭相比,其农业投资减少99.87%,产量减少77%。汇款导致资本和劳动密集型作物的产量下降,反映出总体农业活动的下降。相对于收到的汇款数额,可以观察到类似的农业投资和种植模式。结果对不同的模型规格和估计程序都具有鲁棒性。
{"title":"Migrant remittances, agriculture investment and cropping patterns","authors":"Ubaid Ali,&nbsp;Mazhar Mughal,&nbsp;Lionel de Boisdeffre","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12526","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12526","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate how the receipt and amount of domestic or international transfers influences household decisions regarding farm investment and the selection of capital and labour-intensive crops. We argue that, even though recipient households may use additional income to increase agricultural investment, investment can fall in the short run if labour constraints arising from the migrant member's absence are binding and capital accumulation is suboptimal. Employing a set of endogenous treatment estimates, we test this hypothesis on data from 5636 rural households in Pakistan. Our findings show a substantial difference between recipient and non-recipient households in terms of their economic behaviour. Recipient households make 100% less agricultural investment and generate 82% less production compared to non-recipient households. The estimates are found to be robust when tested with alternate empirical techniques (Heckman Selection and matching). The impact is stronger in the case of households that receive domestic transfers, with 100% less farm investment and 77% less production than non-recipient households. Remittances result in a decrease in production of both capital- and labour-intensive crops, reflecting a decline in overall farm activity. Similar farm investment and cropping patterns are observed relative to the amount of remittances received. The results are robust to different model specifications and estimation procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"899-920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42088006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agricultural input subsidies, extension services, and farm labour productivity nexus: Evidence from maize farmers in Tanzania 农业投入补贴、推广服务和农业劳动生产率关系:来自坦桑尼亚玉米农民的证据
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12537
Kilugala Malimi

This paper examines the effect of agricultural input subsidies (AIS) and agricultural extension services (AES) on farm labour productivity in plots planted with maize in Tanzania, using panel data from the National Panel Survey in Tanzania. To control for the endogeneity of the two programmes, a control function and instrumental variable approach is used to estimate the effects of AIS and AES on farm labour productivity. The results show that AIS and AES are significant in raising labour productivity in maize-planted plots. Similarly, AIS and AES are also effective in increasing land productivity in these plots. Moreover, each programme has comparable effects on land productivity and farm labour productivity. These findings imply that public investments in AIS and AES are effective in raising farm productivity.

本文利用坦桑尼亚国家小组调查的小组数据,研究了农业投入补贴(AIS)和农业推广服务(AES)对坦桑尼亚玉米种植地块农业劳动生产率的影响。为了控制这两个方案的内生性,使用控制函数和工具变量方法来估计AIS和AES对农业劳动生产率的影响。结果表明,AIS和AES在提高玉米种植小区劳动生产率方面具有显著作用。同样,AIS和AES在提高这些地块的土地生产力方面也很有效。此外,每项方案对土地生产力和农业劳动生产率的影响是相当的。这些发现表明,公共投资于农业辅助系统和农业辅助系统在提高农业生产力方面是有效的。
{"title":"Agricultural input subsidies, extension services, and farm labour productivity nexus: Evidence from maize farmers in Tanzania","authors":"Kilugala Malimi","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12537","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12537","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the effect of agricultural input subsidies (AIS) and agricultural extension services (AES) on farm labour productivity in plots planted with maize in Tanzania, using panel data from the National Panel Survey in Tanzania. To control for the endogeneity of the two programmes, a control function and instrumental variable approach is used to estimate the effects of AIS and AES on farm labour productivity. The results show that AIS and AES are significant in raising labour productivity in maize-planted plots. Similarly, AIS and AES are also effective in increasing land productivity in these plots. Moreover, each programme has comparable effects on land productivity and farm labour productivity. These findings imply that public investments in AIS and AES are effective in raising farm productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"874-898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12537","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46476749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes: A systematic review 行为因素和机会成本在农民参与自愿农业-环境计划中的作用:系统回顾
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12538
Sergei Schaub, Jaboury Ghazoul, Robert Huber, Wei Zhang, Adelaide Sander, Charles Rees, Simanti Banerjee, Robert Finger

Agri-environmental schemes (AESs) are increasingly implemented to promote the adoption of environmentally friendly practices by farmers. We use a systematic review to explore the role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' decisions to participate in AESs in Australia, Europe and North America. Behavioural factors influence how farmers value and perceive options, while opportunity costs relate to farmers' forgone utility when choosing to participate in schemes. We synthesise insights from 79 articles and over 700 factors explaining the participation in AESs. We find that a set of behavioural factors seem consistently connected to participation, including agricultural training, advice and having positive attitudes towards AESs. Moreover, several factors related to opportunity costs also have a rather consistent relationship with AES participation, including market conditions, implementation efforts, profitability, and management and contract flexibility. However, many relationships of behavioural factors and opportunity costs with AES participation are not as consistent and generalizable as sometimes portrayed and require context-specific interpretation. Those factors with mixed results can still provide insights into farmers' participation decisions as several of them are either ‘positively and insignificantly’ or ‘negatively and insignificantly’ related to participation, such as environmental attitude, trust and farm size. These results suggest that their relationship with AES participation depends on other factors or the setting, highlighting interactions and raising important new research questions. Overall, our results provide several entry points for both researchers and policy-makers, highlighting uncertainties in relationships between factors and participation that should be considered when designing policies.

越来越多地实施农业环境计划,以促进农民采用环境友好的做法。我们使用系统回顾来探讨行为因素和机会成本在澳大利亚、欧洲和北美农民参与农业农业ess决策中的作用。行为因素影响农民如何评价和感知选择,而机会成本与农民选择参与计划时放弃的效用有关。我们综合了79篇文章和700多个因素的见解,解释了参与AESs的原因。我们发现,一系列行为因素似乎始终与参与有关,包括农业培训、建议和对AESs的积极态度。此外,与机会成本相关的几个因素也与AES的参与有着相当一致的关系,包括市场条件、实施努力、盈利能力、管理和合同灵活性。然而,许多行为因素和机会成本与AES参与的关系并不像有时描述的那样一致和概括,需要根据具体情况进行解释。这些结果好坏参半的因素仍然可以为农民的参与决策提供见解,因为其中一些因素与参与相关,如环境态度、信任和农场规模,要么是“积极且不显著”,要么是“消极且不显著”。这些结果表明,它们与AES参与的关系取决于其他因素或环境,突出了相互作用并提出了重要的新研究问题。总体而言,我们的研究结果为研究人员和政策制定者提供了几个切入点,强调了在制定政策时应考虑的因素和参与之间关系的不确定性。
{"title":"The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes: A systematic review","authors":"Sergei Schaub,&nbsp;Jaboury Ghazoul,&nbsp;Robert Huber,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Adelaide Sander,&nbsp;Charles Rees,&nbsp;Simanti Banerjee,&nbsp;Robert Finger","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12538","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12538","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agri-environmental schemes (AESs) are increasingly implemented to promote the adoption of environmentally friendly practices by farmers. We use a systematic review to explore the role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' decisions to participate in AESs in Australia, Europe and North America. Behavioural factors influence how farmers value and perceive options, while opportunity costs relate to farmers' forgone utility when choosing to participate in schemes. We synthesise insights from 79 articles and over 700 factors explaining the participation in AESs. We find that a set of behavioural factors seem consistently connected to participation, including agricultural training, advice and having positive attitudes towards AESs. Moreover, several factors related to opportunity costs also have a rather consistent relationship with AES participation, including market conditions, implementation efforts, profitability, and management and contract flexibility. However, many relationships of behavioural factors and opportunity costs with AES participation are not as consistent and generalizable as sometimes portrayed and require context-specific interpretation. Those factors with mixed results can still provide insights into farmers' participation decisions as several of them are either ‘positively and insignificantly’ or ‘negatively and insignificantly’ related to participation, such as environmental attitude, trust and farm size. These results suggest that their relationship with AES participation depends on other factors or the setting, highlighting interactions and raising important new research questions. Overall, our results provide several entry points for both researchers and policy-makers, highlighting uncertainties in relationships between factors and participation that should be considered when designing policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"617-660"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12538","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45599203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Determinants of dairy-product trade: Do subsidies matter? 乳制品贸易的决定因素:补贴重要吗?
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-21 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12536
Magdana Kondaridze, Jeff Luckstead

Given the recent changes in the supply and demand of dairy products, many opportunities arise for exporting and importing countries. This paper examines determinants of dairy-product trade by applying the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) method to the gravity model using panel data on 49 exporting and 235 importing countries for the 17 years from 2000 to 2016. The gravity model is estimated using both interval data and dynamic analyses. The results show that domestic subsidies have a modest, but significant, impact on dairy-product trade across the models. For example, a 1% increase in subsidies leads to a roughly 0.02% increase in trade for an average country. Memberships in trade agreements, market size factors, and government institutions also positively affect dairy-product trade. However, tariffs are insignificant in the main model specification. Results from the lag-policy analysis show that the impact of subsidies disappears after the second year of distribution; whereas for the lead-policy analysis, results suggest at least 3 years of anticipatory effects on domestic subsidies.

鉴于最近乳制品供需的变化,出口国和进口国出现了许多机会。本文使用2000年至2016年17年间49个出口国和235个进口国的面板数据,通过将泊松伪极大似然(PPML)方法应用于重力模型,研究了乳制品贸易的决定因素。利用区间数据和动态分析对重力模型进行了估计。结果表明,国内补贴对各模型乳制品贸易的影响不大,但意义重大。例如,对一个普通国家来说,补贴每增加1%,贸易就会增加约0.02%。贸易协定的成员资格、市场规模因素和政府机构也对乳制品贸易产生积极影响。然而,关税在主要型号规格中是微不足道的。滞后政策分析结果表明,补贴的影响在分配第二年后消失;而对于主导政策分析,结果表明国内补贴至少有3年的预期效应。
{"title":"Determinants of dairy-product trade: Do subsidies matter?","authors":"Magdana Kondaridze,&nbsp;Jeff Luckstead","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12536","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12536","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the recent changes in the supply and demand of dairy products, many opportunities arise for exporting and importing countries. This paper examines determinants of dairy-product trade by applying the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) method to the gravity model using panel data on 49 exporting and 235 importing countries for the 17 years from 2000 to 2016. The gravity model is estimated using both interval data and dynamic analyses. The results show that domestic subsidies have a modest, but significant, impact on dairy-product trade across the models. For example, a 1% increase in subsidies leads to a roughly 0.02% increase in trade for an average country. Memberships in trade agreements, market size factors, and government institutions also positively affect dairy-product trade. However, tariffs are insignificant in the main model specification. Results from the lag-policy analysis show that the impact of subsidies disappears after the second year of distribution; whereas for the lead-policy analysis, results suggest at least 3 years of anticipatory effects on domestic subsidies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"857-873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12536","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47955710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Productivity in Indonesian agriculture: Impacts of domestic and international research 印尼农业生产力:国内外研究的影响
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12533
Peter Warr

Total factor productivity growth contributed 38% of Indonesia's agricultural output growth from the mid-1970s to the mid-2000s. This study uses time series data analysed with an error correction mechanism to examine the contribution that Indonesian publicly funded agricultural research made to this outcome, allowing for other possible determinants of productivity growth, including international agricultural research, extension, government price policy and weather. The results imply a 27% real annual rate of return from a marginal increase in Indonesian agricultural research expenditure. Indonesia's public agricultural research explains virtually all of its agricultural total factor productivity growth between 1975 and 2006.

从上世纪70年代中期到本世纪头十年中期,全要素生产率增长对印尼农业产出增长的贡献为38%。本研究使用时间序列数据进行了误差修正机制分析,以检验印度尼西亚公共资助的农业研究对这一结果的贡献,同时考虑到生产率增长的其他可能决定因素,包括国际农业研究、推广、政府价格政策和天气。结果表明,印尼农业研究支出的边际增长带来了27%的实际年回报率。印度尼西亚的公共农业研究几乎解释了1975年至2006年间该国农业全要素生产率的全部增长。
{"title":"Productivity in Indonesian agriculture: Impacts of domestic and international research","authors":"Peter Warr","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12533","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12533","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Total factor productivity growth contributed 38% of Indonesia's agricultural output growth from the mid-1970s to the mid-2000s. This study uses time series data analysed with an error correction mechanism to examine the contribution that Indonesian publicly funded agricultural research made to this outcome, allowing for other possible determinants of productivity growth, including international agricultural research, extension, government price policy and weather. The results imply a 27% real annual rate of return from a marginal increase in Indonesian agricultural research expenditure. Indonesia's public agricultural research explains virtually all of its agricultural total factor productivity growth between 1975 and 2006.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"835-856"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48263509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Profession and residency matter: Farmers' preferences for farmland price regulation in Germany 职业与居住地关系:德国农民对农地价格调控的偏好
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12535
Johanna Jauernig, Stephan Brosig, Silke Hüttel

Local farmers' preferences for farmland price regulations in competitive markets have not been studied systematically. We investigate farmers' preferences in Germany, where recent price increases have driven calls for regulatory changes. The results of an online vignette experiment show that farmers prefer stricter regulation against the admission of non-local (but even more so of non-farmer) land buyers. Our analysis also shows that local farmers' preferences are motivated primarily by self-interest rather than adherence to principles. We conclude that most farmers prefer price regulations that consider their particular concerns about increasing competition in Germany.

竞争市场中当地农民对农地价格调控的偏好尚未得到系统研究。我们调查了德国农民的偏好,最近的价格上涨推动了监管改革的呼声。一项在线小插图实验的结果显示,农民更倾向于对非本地(但对非农民)土地购买者的准入实行更严格的监管。我们的分析还表明,当地农民的偏好主要是出于自身利益,而不是出于对原则的遵守。我们得出的结论是,大多数农民更喜欢考虑到他们对德国日益激烈的竞争的特殊担忧的价格法规。
{"title":"Profession and residency matter: Farmers' preferences for farmland price regulation in Germany","authors":"Johanna Jauernig,&nbsp;Stephan Brosig,&nbsp;Silke Hüttel","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12535","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12535","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Local farmers' preferences for farmland price regulations in competitive markets have not been studied systematically. We investigate farmers' preferences in Germany, where recent price increases have driven calls for regulatory changes. The results of an online vignette experiment show that farmers prefer stricter regulation against the admission of non-local (but even more so of non-farmer) land buyers. Our analysis also shows that local farmers' preferences are motivated primarily by self-interest rather than adherence to principles. We conclude that most farmers prefer price regulations that consider their particular concerns about increasing competition in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"816-834"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12535","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41529771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
External validity of economic experiments on Agri-environmental scheme design 农业环境方案设计经济实验的外部效度
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12529
Marie Ferré, Stefanie Engel, Elisabeth Gsottbauer

The use of laboratory experiments to study issues in agricultural policy has grown in prominence within the fields of agricultural and environmental economics. Such experiments are often conducted with university students and framed in an abstract manner. This raises questions about whether the findings of these experiments provide reliable insights on the behaviour of actual agents in real settings. We contribute to this methodological debate by analysing the impacts of sample population and framing on behaviour in the experiment and on two policy effects: the direction and the magnitude of the policy impact. We also examine the channels through which differences in results may occur. For this, we test if behaviour is correlated with a set of covariates collected from our samples, including socio-demographics, social and risk preferences. Our main finding is that the type of subject significantly affects the magnitude of the policy impact. The two populations differ substantially in the representation of key characteristics and preferences, which in consequence affects behaviour in the experiment. We find no significant impact of framing on behaviour.

利用实验室实验来研究农业政策问题在农业和环境经济学领域日益突出。这样的实验通常是在大学生中进行的,并以抽象的方式进行。这就提出了一个问题,即这些实验的发现是否为真实环境中实际代理人的行为提供了可靠的见解。我们通过分析样本人口和框架对实验行为的影响,以及对两个政策效应的影响:政策影响的方向和幅度,为这种方法辩论做出了贡献。我们还研究了可能产生结果差异的渠道。为此,我们测试行为是否与从样本中收集的一组协变量相关,包括社会人口统计学、社会和风险偏好。我们的主要发现是,主体类型显著影响政策影响的程度。这两个群体在关键特征和偏好的表现上存在很大差异,这最终影响了实验中的行为。我们没有发现框架对行为的显著影响。
{"title":"External validity of economic experiments on Agri-environmental scheme design","authors":"Marie Ferré,&nbsp;Stefanie Engel,&nbsp;Elisabeth Gsottbauer","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12529","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12529","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of laboratory experiments to study issues in agricultural policy has grown in prominence within the fields of agricultural and environmental economics. Such experiments are often conducted with university students and framed in an abstract manner. This raises questions about whether the findings of these experiments provide reliable insights on the behaviour of actual agents in real settings. We contribute to this methodological debate by analysing the impacts of sample population and framing on behaviour in the experiment and on two policy effects: the direction and the magnitude of the policy impact. We also examine the channels through which differences in results may occur. For this, we test if behaviour is correlated with a set of covariates collected from our samples, including socio-demographics, social and risk preferences. Our main finding is that the type of subject significantly affects the magnitude of the policy impact. The two populations differ substantially in the representation of key characteristics and preferences, which in consequence affects behaviour in the experiment. We find no significant impact of framing on behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"661-685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12529","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41623391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost of abating excess nitrogen on wheat plots in France: An assessment with multi-technology modelling 减少法国小麦地块过量氮的成本:多技术模型评估
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12534
K. Hervé Dakpo, Yann Desjeux, Laure Latruffe

We use a multi-equation model of polluting technologies to evaluate excess nitrogen's marginal abatement cost (MAC). The MAC is estimated using the convex non-parametric quantile regression. The empirical application is conducted at the plot level for wheat production in France in 2017. Results show a median shadow price for excess nitrogen of about €21 per kilogram. If the current European Union's Nitrates Directive (which sets a 170-kg constraint on organic nitrogen per hectare) were extended to mineral nitrogen, this would allow a reduction of total excess nitrogen by 9.5%, but this would be accompanied by a 3.1% decrease in wheat revenue.

本文采用污染技术的多方程模型来评价过量氮的边际减排成本。使用凸非参数分位数回归估计MAC。以2017年法国小麦生产为例,在地块水平上进行了实证应用。结果显示,多余氮的影子价格中值约为每公斤21欧元。如果目前欧盟的硝酸盐指令(每公顷有机氮限制为170公斤)扩展到矿物氮,这将使总过量氮减少9.5%,但这将伴随着小麦收入减少3.1%。
{"title":"Cost of abating excess nitrogen on wheat plots in France: An assessment with multi-technology modelling","authors":"K. Hervé Dakpo,&nbsp;Yann Desjeux,&nbsp;Laure Latruffe","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12534","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12534","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We use a multi-equation model of polluting technologies to evaluate excess nitrogen's marginal abatement cost (MAC). The MAC is estimated using the convex non-parametric quantile regression. The empirical application is conducted at the plot level for wheat production in France in 2017. Results show a median shadow price for excess nitrogen of about €21 per kilogram. If the current European Union's Nitrates Directive (which sets a 170-kg constraint on organic nitrogen per hectare) were extended to mineral nitrogen, this would allow a reduction of total excess nitrogen by 9.5%, but this would be accompanied by a 3.1% decrease in wheat revenue.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"800-815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12534","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46498868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linkages between natural gas, fertiliser and cereal prices: A note 天然气、化肥和谷物价格之间的联系:注释
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12532
Puneet Vatsa, Dragan Miljkovic, Jungho Baek

We use structural vector autoregressions to analyse the dynamic effects of shocks to natural gas and nitrogenous fertiliser prices on three major cereal crops: maize, rice and wheat. We find that the response of cereal prices to natural gas and fertiliser price shocks has been relatively small, instantaneous and transitory. These findings suggest that crop prices may change rapidly in response to energy and fertiliser prices, even when there are no shifts in the underlying fundamentals in crop markets. Furthermore, because the effects of the shocks dissipate rather quickly, short-term measures to address swings in food prices may suffice.

我们使用结构向量自回归分析了天然气和氮肥价格冲击对三种主要谷物作物(玉米、水稻和小麦)的动态影响。我们发现,谷物价格对天然气和化肥价格冲击的反应相对较小,是瞬时和短暂的。这些发现表明,农作物价格可能会随着能源和化肥价格的变化而迅速变化,即使在农作物市场的基本要素没有发生变化的情况下也是如此。此外,由于冲击的影响消散得相当快,应对食品价格波动的短期措施可能就足够了。
{"title":"Linkages between natural gas, fertiliser and cereal prices: A note","authors":"Puneet Vatsa,&nbsp;Dragan Miljkovic,&nbsp;Jungho Baek","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12532","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12532","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We use structural vector autoregressions to analyse the dynamic effects of shocks to natural gas and nitrogenous fertiliser prices on three major cereal crops: maize, rice and wheat. We find that the response of cereal prices to natural gas and fertiliser price shocks has been relatively small, instantaneous and transitory. These findings suggest that crop prices may change rapidly in response to energy and fertiliser prices, even when there are no shifts in the underlying fundamentals in crop markets. Furthermore, because the effects of the shocks dissipate rather quickly, short-term measures to address swings in food prices may suffice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"935-940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46496184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1