Best practices for scapular motion tracking are still being determined. The repeatability of different scapular kinematic procedures needs to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of two scapular kinematic procedures: double calibration with AMC (D-AMC) and individualized linear modelling (LM). Ten healthy participants had their upper body movement tracked with optical motion capture in two identical sessions. Five scapular calibration poses were performed, and seven dynamic functional tasks were tested. Scapular angles were calculated from both procedures (D-AMC vs LM). The D-AMC approach uses two poses (neutral and maximum elevation) and tracks the scapula with a rigid cluster, while the LM approach predicts scapular positioning from humeral angles based on equations built from the calibration pose data. Angle waveforms and repeatability outcomes were compared. Internal and upward rotation angle waveforms were significantly different (p < 0.05) between kinematic procedures for some tasks, with maximum mean differences up to 17.3° and 23.2°, respectively. Overall, repeatability outcomes were similar between procedures, but the LM approach was slightly better for tilt and the D-AMC approach was notably improved for upward rotation in certain tasks. For example, minimal detectable changes during the Forward Transfer ranged from 6.9° to 11.9° for the D-AMC and 8.9° to 25.3° for the LM. Discrepancies between procedures may be a function of the calibration poses chosen. Additional calibration poses may improve the comparisons between procedures.
Osteoporosis is characterized by loss of bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Reduction of hip fracture incidence is of major clinical importance. Hip protectors aim to attenuate the impact force transmitted to the femur upon falling, however different conclusions on their efficacy have been reported; some authors suggest this may be due to differences in compliance. The aim of this study was to apply an In Silico trial methodology to predict the effectiveness of hip protectors and its dependence on compliance.
A cohort of 1044 virtual patients (Finite Element models of proximal femur) were generated. A Markov chain process was implemented to predict fracture incidence with and without hip protectors, by simulating different levels of compliance. At each simulated follow-up year, a Poisson distribution was randomly sampled to determine the number of falls sustained by each patient. Impact direction and force were stochastically sampled from a range of possible scenarios. The effect of wearing a hip protector was simulated by applying attenuation coefficients to the impact force (12.9 %, 19 % and 33.8 %, as reported for available devices). A patient was considered fractured when impact force exceeded the femur strength.
Without hip protector, virtual patients experienced 66 ± 5 fractures in 10 years. Wearing the three devices, fracture incidence was reduced to 43 ± 4, 35 ± 4 and 17 ± 2 respectively, at full compliance. As expected, effectiveness was dependent on compliance.
This In Silico trial technology can be applied in the future to test multiple interventions, optimise intervention strategies, improve clinical trial design and drug development.
Swimmers primarily increase their forward velocity through lower limb motion in breaststroke, making the breaststroke kick crucial for optimizing race times. Recent studies have highlighted the generation of vortices around the swimmer’s entire body to propel forward during swimming. However, the investigation of vortex generation during breaststroke kicks remains unexplored. This study aimed to reveal the propulsive and braking mechanisms of breaststroke kicks by simulating vortex generation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Kinematic data during the breaststroke kick and a three-dimensional digital model were collected to conduct CFD for a male breaststroke swimmer. Vortex generation was determined during one breaststroke kick from the CFD results. Vortices, which potentially induce a decrease in forward velocity, were generated by the swimmer’s lower legs and feet during the recovery phase. The swimmer generated vortices on the dorsal side of the feet and the posterior and lateral sides of the lower legs to increase the forward velocity during the out-sweep phase. The swimmer generated vortices on the lateral sides of the thighs and lower legs and the dorsal and lateral sides of the feet during the in-sweep phase to maintain forward velocity. Moreover, vortices generated from the out-sweep to the in-sweep merged and were shed backward relative to the swimming direction after the in-sweep phase. This study is the first to reveal the propulsive and braking mechanisms of breaststroke kicks by analyzing the vortex generation.
Research investigating ankle function during walking in a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot has either placed markers on the outside of the boot or made major alterations to the structure of the CAM boot to uncover key landmarks. The aim of this study was to quantify joint kinematics and kinetics using “in-boot” skin markers whilst making only minimal structural alterations. Seventeen healthy participants walked at their preferred walking speed in two conditions: (1) in standard athletic trainers (ASICS patriot 8, ASICS Oceania Pty Ltd, USA), and (2) using a hard-cased CAM boot (Rebound® Air Walker, Össur, Iceland) fitted on the right foot. Kinematic measurements revealed that CAM boots restrict sagittal plane ankle range of motion to less than 5°, and to ∼3° in the frontal plane, which is a reduction of 85% and 73% compared to standard footwear, respectively (p < 0.001). This ankle restriction resulted in a reduction of ankle joint total limb work contribution from 38 ± 5% in normal footwear to 13 ± 4% in the CAM boot (p < 0.001). This study suggests that CAM boots do restrict the ankle joint’s ability to effectively perform work during walking, which leads to compensatory mechanisms at the ipsilateral and contralateral hip and knee joints. Our findings align with previous research that employed “on-boot” kinematic measurements, so we conclude that in-boot approaches do not offer any benefit to the researcher and instead, on-boot measurements are suitable.
Nasal valve function depends on the intensity of the inspiratory nasal airflow, the geometry of the nasal entrance and the mechanical properties of the lateral nasal wall. It is desirable to obtain objective information on the relation between flow and valve movement. In this study, the deflection of the lateral nasal wall and the inspiratory flow were measured on 30 healthy volunteers, aged 18 to 82 without a history of severe trauma or nasal surgery. Electro-optical distance sensors were housed under a full-face protective mask attached to an analogue inspiratory flowmeter. The mean values for normal breathing were assessed at 675 [cm3/s] for the bilateral flow and −0.57 mm for the total movement. With forced breathing, the mean values for the flow of both nostrils were found to be 1434 cm3/s and for the total movement −1.21 mm. Statistically significant differences between normal and forced breathing were found in all participants and in both sexes, but no significant correlation by age. Electro-optical distance measurement, representing a novel technical way for the ‘elastography’ of the nasal valve should be added to advanced 4-phase-rhinomanometers.