Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2026.2622925
Felipe Salinas-López, Carlos Calderón, Oscar Véliz-García, Marcos Domic-Siede
Major neurocognitive disorder (MND) is a significant public health concern and a leading cause of disability and dependency among older adults. It is characterized by a chronic and acquired decline in cognitive functioning. For early detection, screening tools such as the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE)-a brief version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III)-have been proposed. This study analyzed data from 1164 adult participants from Antofagasta, Chile, including both the general population and individuals diagnosed with MND. Analyses included reliability estimation, factorial structure assessment using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Item Response Theory (IRT) modeling, and diagnostic utility evaluation. Results indicate excellent reliability (McDonald's Omega = 0.926), a robust unidimensional factor structure, and good model fit under IRT. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis revealed that performance on the clock-drawing item varied significantly according to educational level. Regarding diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.924), a cutoff score of ≤25/30 was proposed for the full sample, yielding 98% sensitivity. Consequently, alternative cutoffs stratified by educational level were also established to optimize performance. Findings support the M-ACE as a valid and reliable tool for cognitive screening and initial assessment of cognitive impairment in adults. The relevance of the clock-drawing task for assessing visuospatial abilities is also discussed.
严重神经认知障碍(MND)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,也是老年人残疾和依赖的主要原因。它的特点是认知功能的慢性和后天下降。为了早期发现,已经提出了筛查工具,如迷你阿登布鲁克认知检查(M-ACE)-阿登布鲁克认知检查- iii (ACE-III)的简短版本。这项研究分析了来自智利安托法加斯塔的1164名成年参与者的数据,包括一般人群和被诊断为MND的个体。分析包括信度估计、使用验证性因子分析(CFA)的因子结构评估、项目反应理论(IRT)模型和诊断效用评估。结果表明,在IRT条件下,麦当劳ω具有良好的信度(0.926),一维因子结构稳健,模型拟合良好。差异项目功能(DIF)分析显示,不同教育水平的学生在时钟绘制项目上的表现差异显著。关于诊断准确性(AUC = 0.924),对于整个样本,建议截断分数≤25/30,产生98%的灵敏度。因此,还建立了按教育水平分层的替代截止点以优化性能。研究结果支持M-ACE作为成人认知筛查和初步评估认知障碍的有效和可靠的工具。时钟绘制任务对评估视觉空间能力的相关性也进行了讨论。
{"title":"Psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) for detecting Major Neurocognitive Disorder in primary healthcare settings.","authors":"Felipe Salinas-López, Carlos Calderón, Oscar Véliz-García, Marcos Domic-Siede","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2622925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2622925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major neurocognitive disorder (MND) is a significant public health concern and a leading cause of disability and dependency among older adults. It is characterized by a chronic and acquired decline in cognitive functioning. For early detection, screening tools such as the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE)-a brief version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III)-have been proposed. This study analyzed data from 1164 adult participants from Antofagasta, Chile, including both the general population and individuals diagnosed with MND. Analyses included reliability estimation, factorial structure assessment using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Item Response Theory (IRT) modeling, and diagnostic utility evaluation. Results indicate excellent reliability (McDonald's Omega = 0.926), a robust unidimensional factor structure, and good model fit under IRT. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis revealed that performance on the clock-drawing item varied significantly according to educational level. Regarding diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.924), a cutoff score of ≤25/30 was proposed for the full sample, yielding 98% sensitivity. Consequently, alternative cutoffs stratified by educational level were also established to optimize performance. Findings support the M-ACE as a valid and reliable tool for cognitive screening and initial assessment of cognitive impairment in adults. The relevance of the clock-drawing task for assessing visuospatial abilities is also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2026.2615962
Pauline T Waskowiak, Suzanne R de Jong, Maureen van Dam, Bernard M J Uitdehaag, Menno M Schoonheim, Hanneke E Hulst, Martin Klein, Brigit A de Jong
Introduction: Information processing speed (IPS) is frequently impaired in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and can potentially interfere with functioning in other cognitive domains. A relationship between IPS and visuospatial memory has been shown, but the impact of IPS on the separate components of visuospatial memory remains unclear. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between IPS impairment and encoding, active and passive retrieval, and learning indices of visuospatial memory in PwMS.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from 92 PwMS with cognitive complaints and 29 matched healthy controls (HCs) were retrospectively analyzed. IPS and visuospatial memory were measured using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R), respectively. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of IPS impairment (z-score ≤-1.5) for visuospatial encoding, active and passive retrieval, as well as learning indices scores.
Results: In total, 47.8% of PwMS were impaired on the SDMT. IPS impairment significantly predicted lower performance on the second (ß = -0.26, p = 0.011) and third (ß = -0.29, p = 0.003) learning trials, active retrieval (ß = -0.33, p < 0.001), and learning index (ß = -0.28, p = 0.003) of the BVMT-R in PwMS. No significant association was found between IPS impairment and the initial learning and passive retrieval scores. In HCs, no association between IPS and BVMT-R performance was found.
Conclusion: PwMS with IPS impairment perform worse on visuospatial learning and memory, particularly in the later encoding phases and active retrieval of information. These findings highlight the importance of taking IPS impairment into account when interpreting visuospatial memory performance in MS.
信息处理速度(IPS)在多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者中经常受损,并可能干扰其他认知领域的功能。IPS与视觉空间记忆之间的关系已被证实,但IPS对视觉空间记忆的单独组成部分的影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们的目的是探讨IPS损伤与视觉空间记忆编码、主动和被动检索以及学习指标之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析92例有认知障碍的PwMS和29例匹配的健康对照(hc)的横断面数据。IPS和视觉空间记忆分别采用符号数字模态测试(SDMT)和简短视觉空间记忆测试-修订(BVMT-R)进行测量。采用层次回归分析评估视觉空间编码、主动和被动检索以及学习指标得分对IPS功能障碍(z-score≤-1.5)的预测价值。结果:共47.8%的PwMS在SDMT上受损。在第二、三次学习试验中(ß = -0.26, p = 0.011),主动检索(ß = -0.33, p = 0.003), IPS功能障碍显著预测了较低的学习成绩。IPS损伤与初始学习和被动检索得分之间没有显著的关联。在hcc中,未发现IPS与BVMT-R性能之间的关联。结论:IPS损伤的PwMS在视觉空间学习和记忆方面表现较差,尤其是在后期编码阶段和主动信息检索方面。这些发现强调了在解释多发性硬化症的视觉空间记忆表现时考虑IPS损伤的重要性。
{"title":"The impact of Information processing speed on visuospatial memory encoding and retrieval in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Pauline T Waskowiak, Suzanne R de Jong, Maureen van Dam, Bernard M J Uitdehaag, Menno M Schoonheim, Hanneke E Hulst, Martin Klein, Brigit A de Jong","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2615962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2615962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Information processing speed (IPS) is frequently impaired in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and can potentially interfere with functioning in other cognitive domains. A relationship between IPS and visuospatial memory has been shown, but the impact of IPS on the separate components of visuospatial memory remains unclear. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between IPS impairment and encoding, active and passive retrieval, and learning indices of visuospatial memory in PwMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 92 PwMS with cognitive complaints and 29 matched healthy controls (HCs) were retrospectively analyzed. IPS and visuospatial memory were measured using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R), respectively. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of IPS impairment (z-score ≤-1.5) for visuospatial encoding, active and passive retrieval, as well as learning indices scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 47.8% of PwMS were impaired on the SDMT. IPS impairment significantly predicted lower performance on the second (ß = -0.26, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and third (ß = -0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.003) learning trials, active retrieval (ß = -0.33, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and learning index (ß = -0.28, <i>p</i> = 0.003) of the BVMT-R in PwMS. No significant association was found between IPS impairment and the initial learning and passive retrieval scores. In HCs, no association between IPS and BVMT-R performance was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PwMS with IPS impairment perform worse on visuospatial learning and memory, particularly in the later encoding phases and active retrieval of information. These findings highlight the importance of taking IPS impairment into account when interpreting visuospatial memory performance in MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2026.2617347
Scott A Langenecker, Sara L Weisenbach
In this introduction to this special issue, we describe how rumination (habitual, negative, perseverative thought processes) plays a critical role in the experience of depression and anxiety, the cognitive decrements common to these disorders, and daily functioning. We argue that the traditional concept of depression as a functional disorder is limiting, given what is now known about brain processes underlying depression, in addition to the impact of psychological mechanisms like rumination on cognitive functioning. We go on to summarize the seven original empirical studies that compose this special issue. Together, these studies incorporate work across the lifespan and include multiple contexts and modalities in which depressive symptoms and rumination were meaningfully evaluated. We challenge researchers and clinicians alike to better understand the day-to-day cognitive implications and treatments for rumination. We conclude with recommendations for neuropsychologists in clinical practice that can be easily implemented to provide a better understanding of the role of rumination and other psychological mechanisms common to psychiatric disorders, including measures to include in a test battery and patient behaviors to look for. Ultimately, we hope that this issue can provide guidance for the treatment team, employers, educators, and family members affected by these conditions.
{"title":"A New frontier in assessing functional and cognitive impediments in psychiatric disorders and avenues for mitigation and treatment: a special issue about rumination, cognitive performance, and depressive symptoms.","authors":"Scott A Langenecker, Sara L Weisenbach","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2617347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2617347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this introduction to this special issue, we describe how rumination (habitual, negative, perseverative thought processes) plays a critical role in the experience of depression and anxiety, the cognitive decrements common to these disorders, and daily functioning. We argue that the traditional concept of depression as a functional disorder is limiting, given what is now known about brain processes underlying depression, in addition to the impact of psychological mechanisms like rumination on cognitive functioning. We go on to summarize the seven original empirical studies that compose this special issue. Together, these studies incorporate work across the lifespan and include multiple contexts and modalities in which depressive symptoms and rumination were meaningfully evaluated. We challenge researchers and clinicians alike to better understand the day-to-day cognitive implications and treatments for rumination. We conclude with recommendations for neuropsychologists in clinical practice that can be easily implemented to provide a better understanding of the role of rumination and other psychological mechanisms common to psychiatric disorders, including measures to include in a test battery and patient behaviors to look for. Ultimately, we hope that this issue can provide guidance for the treatment team, employers, educators, and family members affected by these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2026.2617353
Julie Petersen, Sonya V Gupta, Alexandra C Apple, Derin Cobia, Mehmet E Dokucu, Eric D Donnelly, William J Gradishar, Marko Mihailovic, James L Reilly, Joel L Voss, Lynne I Wagner, Sandra Weintraub, Lei Wang
Introduction: Breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy commonly report adverse effects that can lead to lower quality of life and treatment nonadherence. How hormone therapy, independent of other systemic therapies, may impact patient functioning is a relatively new area of research with few neuroimaging studies delineating the effects. Prior nonspecific neuropsychological findings and the multifaceted role of estrogen in the brain suggest potentially diffuse effects of hormone therapy. The current study examined intrinsic neural functional organization and cognitive correlates unique to breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy.
Method: Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired from 24 breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy and 32 healthy controls. Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) was calculated between brain regions. Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF) was computed within a rsFC-derived mask to describe the regional properties within sites of dysconnectivity. Objective measures of cognition were obtained using neuropsychological tests and correlated with rsFC.
Results: Patients demonstrated extensive dysconnectivity relative to controls, largely characterized by parietal-occipital hypoconnectivity. Reduced rsFC occurred primarily between regions with increased fALFF. A modest relationship between rsFC and visual working memory was observed in breast cancer patients but not in controls.
Conclusions: This study is the first to examine whole-brain rsFC in breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy. We found robust hypoconnectivity in patients, which demonstrated modest relationships with cognition. Identifying the pattern by which breast cancer and hormone therapy affect brain networks may aid in the development of therapeutic options for patients experiencing negative effects of hormone therapy, thus improving quality of life for cancer survivors. Further, the detection of abnormal brain function may help characterize treatment-associated neural changes that are not captured by standard cognitive measures.
{"title":"Functional dysconnectivity in breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy.","authors":"Julie Petersen, Sonya V Gupta, Alexandra C Apple, Derin Cobia, Mehmet E Dokucu, Eric D Donnelly, William J Gradishar, Marko Mihailovic, James L Reilly, Joel L Voss, Lynne I Wagner, Sandra Weintraub, Lei Wang","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2617353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2617353","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy commonly report adverse effects that can lead to lower quality of life and treatment nonadherence. How hormone therapy, independent of other systemic therapies, may impact patient functioning is a relatively new area of research with few neuroimaging studies delineating the effects. Prior nonspecific neuropsychological findings and the multifaceted role of estrogen in the brain suggest potentially diffuse effects of hormone therapy. The current study examined intrinsic neural functional organization and cognitive correlates unique to breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired from 24 breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy and 32 healthy controls. Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) was calculated between brain regions. Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF) was computed within a rsFC-derived mask to describe the regional properties within sites of dysconnectivity. Objective measures of cognition were obtained using neuropsychological tests and correlated with rsFC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients demonstrated extensive dysconnectivity relative to controls, largely characterized by parietal-occipital hypoconnectivity. Reduced rsFC occurred primarily between regions with increased fALFF. A modest relationship between rsFC and visual working memory was observed in breast cancer patients but not in controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to examine whole-brain rsFC in breast cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy. We found robust hypoconnectivity in patients, which demonstrated modest relationships with cognition. Identifying the pattern by which breast cancer and hormone therapy affect brain networks may aid in the development of therapeutic options for patients experiencing negative effects of hormone therapy, thus improving quality of life for cancer survivors. Further, the detection of abnormal brain function may help characterize treatment-associated neural changes that are not captured by standard cognitive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146018621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2026.2617355
Helena Holmäng, Rosanna Fagerudd, Parisa Hajjari, Malin Huldt Oldmark, Klara Jakobsson, Alexandra Serrano Toro, Ingrid Vinsa, Elisabeth Fernell, Nouchine Hadjikhani, Christopher Gillberg, Jakob Åsberg Johnels, Mats Johnson, Max Thorsson
Introduction: Despite increasing recognition of pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS), its neuropsychological underpinnings remain limited, particularly in relation to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. PANS manifests abruptly with severe OCD and/or eating restrictions alongside concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms, causing distress and functional impairment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between neurocognitive performance and OCD symptom severity in children and adolescents with PANS.
Method: Twelve children and adolescents with PANS were assessed on a total of 39 occasions using a novel touchscreen-based button-choice reaction time task. The task was designed to capture subtle aspects of attentional focus, motor precision, and response speed. Analyses examined associations between OCD symptom severity, assessed for each testing session, and performance measures.
Results: Greater OCD symptom severity was associated with heightened attentiveness (noticing the lit-up button) and more centered touch positioning, but not with faster reaction times. A significant interaction was observed, whereby increased attentiveness and precision in touch placement were linked to longer reaction times, suggesting a trade-off between speed and perfectionistic response strategies.
Conclusions: Overall, while OCD symptom severity was not directly associated with reaction time, it significantly shaped response monitoring and touch positioning. These findings indicate a neurocognitive profile in PANS characterized by heightened self-monitoring and meticulousness, potentially reflecting mechanisms underlying OCD symptomatology. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between neurocognitive performance and OCD symptom severity in PANS, as revealed through digital assessment, contributing to a deeper understanding of the condition.
{"title":"Trade-off between speed and accuracy: associations between obsessive-compulsive symptoms and meticulousness in PANS.","authors":"Helena Holmäng, Rosanna Fagerudd, Parisa Hajjari, Malin Huldt Oldmark, Klara Jakobsson, Alexandra Serrano Toro, Ingrid Vinsa, Elisabeth Fernell, Nouchine Hadjikhani, Christopher Gillberg, Jakob Åsberg Johnels, Mats Johnson, Max Thorsson","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2617355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2617355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite increasing recognition of pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS), its neuropsychological underpinnings remain limited, particularly in relation to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. PANS manifests abruptly with severe OCD and/or eating restrictions alongside concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms, causing distress and functional impairment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between neurocognitive performance and OCD symptom severity in children and adolescents with PANS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve children and adolescents with PANS were assessed on a total of 39 occasions using a novel touchscreen-based button-choice reaction time task. The task was designed to capture subtle aspects of attentional focus, motor precision, and response speed. Analyses examined associations between OCD symptom severity, assessed for each testing session, and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater OCD symptom severity was associated with heightened attentiveness (noticing the lit-up button) and more centered touch positioning, but not with faster reaction times. A significant interaction was observed, whereby increased attentiveness and precision in touch placement were linked to longer reaction times, suggesting a trade-off between speed and perfectionistic response strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, while OCD symptom severity was not directly associated with reaction time, it significantly shaped response monitoring and touch positioning. These findings indicate a neurocognitive profile in PANS characterized by heightened self-monitoring and meticulousness, potentially reflecting mechanisms underlying OCD symptomatology. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between neurocognitive performance and OCD symptom severity in PANS, as revealed through digital assessment, contributing to a deeper understanding of the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2026.2617339
Donnchadh Murphy, Jonathan Scott, Craig Newman, Rupert Noad
Introduction: The Trail Making Test (TMT) is an important test when assessing for cognitive difficulties in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, the pencil-and-paper format can be susceptible to administration and scoring errors and may disproportionately reflect motor impairments rather than cognitive performance. The current study sought to evaluate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of two novel computerized versions of the TMT: iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag.
Method: This study used a quasi-experimental diagnostic accuracy design, and included 34 healthy controls, 28 people with Parkinson's disease with normal cognition (PD-NC), and 31 people with Parkinson's disease mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Participants were administered a short battery of cognitive tests, including three counterbalanced versions of the TMT (traditional TMT, iTMT-Tap & iTMT-Drag). Additionally, the iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag were readministered following a brief break.
Results: Both the iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag demonstrated adequate convergent validity and retest reliability and achieved acceptable classification accuracy for identifying PD-MCI. The current study identified hidden indices of measurement which may minimize administration time or the confounding impact of motor functioning, and these indices achieved fair diagnostic accuracy also.
Conclusion: The results of this research suggest that the iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag may be a valid substitute for the traditional TMT, and subject to further validation, could be a useful addition to clinical practice. Recommendations for future research and subsequent clinical deployment are discussed.
{"title":"The iTrail making test (iTMT): an evaluation of novel testing paradigms, hidden indices of measurement, and diagnostic accuracy in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Donnchadh Murphy, Jonathan Scott, Craig Newman, Rupert Noad","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2617339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2617339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Trail Making Test (TMT) is an important test when assessing for cognitive difficulties in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, the pencil-and-paper format can be susceptible to administration and scoring errors and may disproportionately reflect motor impairments rather than cognitive performance. The current study sought to evaluate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of two novel computerized versions of the TMT: iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used a quasi-experimental diagnostic accuracy design, and included 34 healthy controls, 28 people with Parkinson's disease with normal cognition (PD-NC), and 31 people with Parkinson's disease mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Participants were administered a short battery of cognitive tests, including three counterbalanced versions of the TMT (traditional TMT, iTMT-Tap & iTMT-Drag). Additionally, the iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag were readministered following a brief break.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag demonstrated adequate convergent validity and retest reliability and achieved acceptable classification accuracy for identifying PD-MCI. The current study identified hidden indices of measurement which may minimize administration time or the confounding impact of motor functioning, and these indices achieved fair diagnostic accuracy also.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this research suggest that the iTMT-Tap and iTMT-Drag may be a valid substitute for the traditional TMT, and subject to further validation, could be a useful addition to clinical practice. Recommendations for future research and subsequent clinical deployment are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2608340
Hannah M Klinger, Gillian T Coughlan, Kathleen M Hayden, JoAnn E Manson, Robert A Wild, Su Yon Jung, Ramon Casanova, Longjian Liu, Aladdin H Shadyab, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Susan M Schembre, Simin Liu, Stephen R Rapp, Rebecca E Amariglio, Dorene M Rentz, Susan M Resnick, Suzanne Baker, Rachel F Buckley
Introduction: Understanding the risk factors that associate with early cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important to identify high-risk individuals and initiate early intervention. Existing studies show that APOEε4, systemic inflammation, and diabetes may play roles in cognitive decline, but the extent to which these factors interact with each other remains unclear. Our objective was to examine the main effects and higher-order interactions between APOEε4, high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a measure of systemic inflammation, and diabetes on domain-specific measures of cognitive function in two ancillary studies of post-menopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).
Method: We identified 2979 cognitively unimpaired women from the WHI Epidemiology of Cognitive Health Outcomes and the WHI Memory Study of Younger Women with cognitive follow-up of up to 13 years. Linear mixed-effects models examined the main and interactive effects of APOEε4, hs-CRP, and diabetes on longitudinal changes in the personal communication for Cognitive Status-modified Test (TICS-m), East Boston Memory Test (immediate and delayed; EBMT), Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT), Verbal Fluency Test (VF-A), Digit Span Test Backwards (DST-backward), and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). All models were adjusted for baseline age, education, body mass index, the WHI randomization arm, and the cohort.
Results: APOEε4 carriers had steeper cognitive decline in TICS-m, EBMT (immediate and delayed), VF-A, and CVLT scores relative to non-carriers. Higher levels of hs-CRP were associated with steeper cognitive decline in the DST-backwards scores. There was no association of diabetes or any evidence of interactive effects on cognitive decline in our study.
Conclusions: In this large longitudinal study of post-menopausal women, our findings support the hypothesis that genetic risk and systemic inflammation independently influence cognitive decline, but there was no evidence of synergistic effects in postmenopausal women. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanistic pathways underlying these associations with cognitive decline.
{"title":"Independent, but not synergistic, associations of <i>APOE</i>ε4 and systemic inflammation on cognitive decline: findings from the Women's Health Initiative.","authors":"Hannah M Klinger, Gillian T Coughlan, Kathleen M Hayden, JoAnn E Manson, Robert A Wild, Su Yon Jung, Ramon Casanova, Longjian Liu, Aladdin H Shadyab, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Susan M Schembre, Simin Liu, Stephen R Rapp, Rebecca E Amariglio, Dorene M Rentz, Susan M Resnick, Suzanne Baker, Rachel F Buckley","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2608340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2608340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding the risk factors that associate with early cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important to identify high-risk individuals and initiate early intervention. Existing studies show that APOEε4, systemic inflammation, and diabetes may play roles in cognitive decline, but the extent to which these factors interact with each other remains unclear. Our objective was to examine the main effects and higher-order interactions between APOEε4, high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a measure of systemic inflammation, and diabetes on domain-specific measures of cognitive function in two ancillary studies of post-menopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We identified 2979 cognitively unimpaired women from the WHI Epidemiology of Cognitive Health Outcomes and the WHI Memory Study of Younger Women with cognitive follow-up of up to 13 years. Linear mixed-effects models examined the main and interactive effects of APOEε4, hs-CRP, and diabetes on longitudinal changes in the personal communication for Cognitive Status-modified Test (TICS-m), East Boston Memory Test (immediate and delayed; EBMT), Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT), Verbal Fluency Test (VF-A), Digit Span Test Backwards (DST-backward), and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). All models were adjusted for baseline age, education, body mass index, the WHI randomization arm, and the cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APOEε4 carriers had steeper cognitive decline in TICS-m, EBMT (immediate and delayed), VF-A, and CVLT scores relative to non-carriers. Higher levels of hs-CRP were associated with steeper cognitive decline in the DST-backwards scores. There was no association of diabetes or any evidence of interactive effects on cognitive decline in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large longitudinal study of post-menopausal women, our findings support the hypothesis that genetic risk and systemic inflammation independently influence cognitive decline, but there was no evidence of synergistic effects in postmenopausal women. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanistic pathways underlying these associations with cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2596181
Monika McAtarsney-Kovacs, Raju Sapkota, Shahina Pardhan, Ian van der Linde
Introduction: Early detection of cognitive decline is critical, yet commonly used screening tools may yield divergent results. This study examined the alignment of four widely used instruments in a community-dwelling cohort.
Method: Seventy-nine participants (Mage = 71.20, SD = 6.29; 39 male, 40 female) were recruited from the general community and assessed under standardized laboratory conditions. Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), from which scores for the MoCA Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) and the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) were also calculated. Test agreement was examined using observed agreement and Cohen's kappa, and score relationships were evaluated using Pearson correlations.
Results: All but one test pair (M-ACE vs MoCA-MIS) showed strong score correlations. However, agreement between MoCA and ACE-III for classifying participants as below threshold was only fair. MoCA identified twice as many participants as impaired compared with ACE-III, raising the possibility of either greater sensitivity or higher false-positive classification. Overall, 41% of participants (n = 32) scored below threshold on at least one measure, but only 6% (n = 5) were below threshold across all four. Of four participants with a prior mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, only one, who had more pronounced deficits, scored below threshold in all tests.
Conclusions: Despite strong inter-test correlations, substantial divergence in classification outcome was observed, particularly between MoCA and ACE-III. Reliance on a single screening instrument risks misclassification, with implications for both over- and under-diagnosis. Greater harmonization between screening tools is needed to improve diagnostic consistency. Clinical practice should therefore combine multiple-instrument approaches, potentially including premorbid function, and interpret screening test scores cautiously. Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment may provide a more complete picture, particularly in cases where diagnostic confidence is low, although this is not routine practice in all services.
早期发现认知能力下降是至关重要的,然而常用的筛查工具可能会产生不同的结果。本研究检查了四种广泛使用的工具在社区居住队列中的对齐。方法:从普通社区招募79名受试者,在标准化的实验室条件下进行评估,其中男39名,女40名,年龄为71.20,SD = 6.29。参与者完成了蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和阿登布鲁克认知测试- iii (ACE-III),并根据MoCA记忆指数评分(MoCA- mis)和迷你阿登布鲁克认知测试(M-ACE)计算得分。检验一致性使用观察一致性和Cohen’s kappa进行检验,评分关系使用Pearson相关性进行评估。结果:除了一个测试对(M-ACE vs MoCA-MIS)外,所有测试对都显示出很强的评分相关性。然而,MoCA和ACE-III之间关于将参与者分类为低于阈值的协议只是公平的。与ACE-III相比,MoCA识别出的受损参与者数量是前者的两倍,这提高了灵敏度或假阳性分类的可能性。总体而言,41%的参与者(n = 32)在至少一项测试中得分低于阈值,但只有6% (n = 5)在所有四项测试中得分低于阈值。在先前诊断为轻度认知障碍(MCI)的四名参与者中,只有一名有更明显缺陷的参与者在所有测试中得分低于阈值。结论:尽管测试间存在很强的相关性,但在分类结果上观察到实质性的差异,特别是在MoCA和ACE-III之间。依赖单一筛查工具有分类错误的风险,对过度诊断和诊断不足都有影响。需要加强筛查工具之间的协调,以提高诊断的一致性。因此,临床实践应结合多种仪器方法,可能包括发病前功能,并谨慎解释筛查测试分数。全面的神经心理学评估可以提供更全面的情况,特别是在诊断可信度较低的情况下,尽管这不是所有服务的常规做法。
{"title":"Agreement between cognitive screening tools: a comparison of MoCA, ACE-III, M-ACE, and MoCA-MIS.","authors":"Monika McAtarsney-Kovacs, Raju Sapkota, Shahina Pardhan, Ian van der Linde","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2596181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2596181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of cognitive decline is critical, yet commonly used screening tools may yield divergent results. This study examined the alignment of four widely used instruments in a community-dwelling cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-nine participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 71.20, SD = 6.29; 39 male, 40 female) were recruited from the general community and assessed under standardized laboratory conditions. Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), from which scores for the MoCA Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) and the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) were also calculated. Test agreement was examined using observed agreement and Cohen's kappa, and score relationships were evaluated using Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All but one test pair (M-ACE vs MoCA-MIS) showed strong score correlations. However, agreement between MoCA and ACE-III for classifying participants as below threshold was only <i>fair</i>. MoCA identified twice as many participants as impaired compared with ACE-III, raising the possibility of either greater sensitivity or higher false-positive classification. Overall, 41% of participants (<i>n</i> = 32) scored below threshold on at least one measure, but only 6% (<i>n</i> = 5) were below threshold across all four. Of four participants with a prior mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, only one, who had more pronounced deficits, scored below threshold in all tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite strong inter-test correlations, substantial divergence in classification outcome was observed, particularly between MoCA and ACE-III. Reliance on a single screening instrument risks misclassification, with implications for both over- and under-diagnosis. Greater harmonization between screening tools is needed to improve diagnostic consistency. Clinical practice should therefore combine multiple-instrument approaches, potentially including premorbid function, and interpret screening test scores cautiously. Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment may provide a more complete picture, particularly in cases where diagnostic confidence is low, although this is not routine practice in all services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145888976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824
Morgan D Tallman, Holly Timblin, Taylor Maynard, Brianna E Kelly, Rebecca K MacAulay
Objective: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important yet heterogeneous indicator of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Sex and health-related disparities in risk are well established, but differences in prevalence and conversion rates from SCD to MCI/Dementia by risk factor remain unclear.
Method: This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated the relative risk (RR) of sex, depression, hypertension, and diabetes in conversion from SCD to MCI/dementia. Q and I2 statistics investigated heterogeneity. Prevalence rates were also calculated.
Results: Five cross-cultural studies (N = 1136) were eligible for the meta-analyses. Participants, on average, had less than 12 years of education. Pooled analyses showed no significant differences in the RR of conversion for depression, hypertension, or diabetes. The pooled conversion rate of SCD to MCI was 17.2% and 8.7% to dementia. Evidence of heterogeneity suggested that the aggregated data may mask differences between studies; thus, unpublished conversion rates on comorbid SCD and the health conditions are reported to inform future research.
Conclusions: Relative risk estimates align with the greater literature and extend them to an inclusive cross-cultural sample with lower education. The significant heterogeneity found underscores the complexity of the interactions between cognitive decline and modifiable risk factors. This study provides novel conversion rates to MCI and dementia for individuals with comorbid SCD and depression, hypertension, and diabetes. We recommend that sex-stratified conversion rates are reported, as limited data prevented our meta-analysis from examining this important dimension of risk.
{"title":"Conversion of subjective cognitive decline to MCI and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences and risk factors.","authors":"Morgan D Tallman, Holly Timblin, Taylor Maynard, Brianna E Kelly, Rebecca K MacAulay","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2609824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important yet heterogeneous indicator of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Sex and health-related disparities in risk are well established, but differences in prevalence and conversion rates from SCD to MCI/Dementia by risk factor remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated the relative risk (RR) of sex, depression, hypertension, and diabetes in conversion from SCD to MCI/dementia. Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics investigated heterogeneity. Prevalence rates were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five cross-cultural studies (<i>N</i> = 1136) were eligible for the meta-analyses. Participants, on average, had less than 12 years of education. Pooled analyses showed no significant differences in the RR of conversion for depression, hypertension, or diabetes. The pooled conversion rate of SCD to MCI was 17.2% and 8.7% to dementia. Evidence of heterogeneity suggested that the aggregated data may mask differences between studies; thus, unpublished conversion rates on comorbid SCD and the health conditions are reported to inform future research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative risk estimates align with the greater literature and extend them to an inclusive cross-cultural sample with lower education. The significant heterogeneity found underscores the complexity of the interactions between cognitive decline and modifiable risk factors. This study provides novel conversion rates to MCI and dementia for individuals with comorbid SCD and depression, hypertension, and diabetes. We recommend that sex-stratified conversion rates are reported, as limited data prevented our meta-analysis from examining this important dimension of risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2594596
Xinyi Deng, Shuo Wang, Yulin Wang, Xu Lei
Prior research has shown a strong association between insomnia and affective symptoms including depressive and anxiety symptoms. Rumination, defined as repetitive negative thinking, impacts both insomnia and affective symptoms. However, relying solely on self-reported sleep measures, it remains unclear whether rumination and affective symptoms interact with their subjective-objective sleep discrepancy (SOSD) rather than perceived sleep duration per se. SOSD is defined as a mismatch between perceived and objectively measured total sleep time (TST). Negative SOSD (i.e. underestimating TST) is a phenotype of sleep disturbance that increases the risk of insomnia in daily life. Therefore, the cross-sectional study investigated whether trait anxiety and depression influence SOSD performance in the presence of rumination. We measured SOSD using sleep diaries and actigraphy over five days, and assessed subjective sleep quality, rumination, depression, and trait anxiety through self-reported surveys. We further classified 672 participants (20.66 ± 1.89 years old; 68.0% female) into three SOSD groups: underestimating (UE), correctly estimating (CE), and overestimating (OE) TST. The results showed that the CE and UE groups had similar rumination levels, whereas the OE group exhibited significantly lower rumination. We found no differences in depression or trait anxiety across SOSD groups. Linear regression models showed that greater rumination and affective symptoms significantly and separately predicted lower SOSD values, and females showed more underestimation TST compared to males. When rumination was included, neither depression nor anxiety uniquely predicted SOSD, regardless of sex, though each overall model remained significant. These findings suggest that depression and anxiety share overlapping explanatory variance with rumination in relation to SOSD outcomes among young adults and interventions targeting rumination and affective symptoms may hold promise for populations with negative SOSD, especially for females.
{"title":"The impacts of rumination and affective symptoms on subjective-objective sleep discrepancy.","authors":"Xinyi Deng, Shuo Wang, Yulin Wang, Xu Lei","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2594596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2594596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has shown a strong association between insomnia and affective symptoms including depressive and anxiety symptoms. Rumination, defined as repetitive negative thinking, impacts both insomnia and affective symptoms. However, relying solely on self-reported sleep measures, it remains unclear whether rumination and affective symptoms interact with their subjective-objective sleep discrepancy (SOSD) rather than perceived sleep duration per se. SOSD is defined as a mismatch between perceived and objectively measured total sleep time (TST). Negative SOSD (i.e. underestimating TST) is a phenotype of sleep disturbance that increases the risk of insomnia in daily life. Therefore, the cross-sectional study investigated whether trait anxiety and depression influence SOSD performance in the presence of rumination. We measured SOSD using sleep diaries and actigraphy over five days, and assessed subjective sleep quality, rumination, depression, and trait anxiety through self-reported surveys. We further classified 672 participants (20.66 ± 1.89 years old; 68.0% female) into three SOSD groups: underestimating (UE), correctly estimating (CE), and overestimating (OE) TST. The results showed that the CE and UE groups had similar rumination levels, whereas the OE group exhibited significantly lower rumination. We found no differences in depression or trait anxiety across SOSD groups. Linear regression models showed that greater rumination and affective symptoms significantly and separately predicted lower SOSD values, and females showed more underestimation TST compared to males. When rumination was included, neither depression nor anxiety uniquely predicted SOSD, regardless of sex, though each overall model remained significant. These findings suggest that depression and anxiety share overlapping explanatory variance with rumination in relation to SOSD outcomes among young adults and interventions targeting rumination and affective symptoms may hold promise for populations with negative SOSD, especially for females.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}