首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics最新文献

英文 中文
Journal Article Reviews. 期刊文章评论。
Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000713
Carol C Weitzman, Oana DeVinck-Baroody, Rachel M. Moore, Sarah S Nyp
ADHD Curry AE, Yerys BE, Metzger KB, et al. Traffic crashes, violations, and suspensions among young drivers with ADHD. Pediatrics. 2019;e20182305. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood disorder that often persists into adolescence, when driving typically begins for most. Recent studies have found first-crash involvement to be 36% higher among drivers with ADHD compared with other adolescents. Curry et al. conducted a large retrospective cohort study to compare monthly rates of overall and specific crash types, violations, and suspensions over the initial 4 years of licensure for adolescent drivers with and without ADHD. A cohort of primary care patients at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia born between 1987 and 1997 were examined with linkage of electronic health records and state traffic data. A total of 14,936 adolescents were included, and 12% had a diagnosis of ADHD. Curry et al. found that crash rates were higher for drivers with ADHD regardless of licensing age, especially during the first month of licensure (adjusted rate ratio [ARR]: 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18–2.23]). After adjusting for potential covariates and temporal trends, the 4-year crash rate of novice adolescent drivers with ADHD was 37% higher than that of drivers without ADHD (ARR 5 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26–1.48). Those with ADHD had 2.1 times higher rate of alcoholrelated crashes than that of drivers without ADHD, and in the first year of driving, the rate of alcohol and/or drug violations was 3.6 times higher for adolescents with ADHD. In addition, rates of moving violations were consistently higher for drivers with ADHD over the study period (at 48 months ARR: 1.47; [95% CI 1.36–1.58]). Information about the rates of medication use in this sample was not reported. This study highlights the need to support young drivers, particularly right after they obtain their license, with a focus on also decreasing risktaking behaviors. O.V.B.
Curry AE, Yerys BE, Metzger KB,等。患有多动症的年轻司机的交通事故、违规行为和停牌行为。儿科。2019;e20182305。注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种常见的儿童疾病,通常会持续到青春期,而大多数人开始开车的时候。最近的研究发现,与其他青少年相比,患有多动症的司机首次撞车的几率要高36%。Curry等人进行了一项大型回顾性队列研究,比较了有和没有多动症的青少年司机在获得驾照的最初4年里,总体和特定碰撞类型、违规行为和停牌的月发生率。对1987年至1997年间出生的费城儿童医院初级保健患者进行了一组电子健康记录和州交通数据的联系检查。共有14936名青少年被纳入研究,其中12%被诊断为多动症。Curry等人发现,无论驾照年龄大小,ADHD司机的撞车率都更高,尤其是在驾照的第一个月(调整后的比率[ARR]: 1.62[95%置信区间(CI): 1.18-2.23])。在调整潜在协变量和时间趋势后,患有ADHD的青少年新手驾驶员的4年撞车率比没有ADHD的驾驶员高37% (ARR 5 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26-1.48)。与没有多动症的司机相比,患有多动症的司机发生与酒精相关的撞车事故的几率要高出2.1倍。在驾驶的第一年,患有多动症的青少年发生酒精和/或药物违规的几率要高出3.6倍。此外,在研究期间,ADHD司机的违章率一直较高(48个月时的ARR: 1.47;[95% ci 1.36-1.58])。该样本中有关药物使用率的信息未被报道。这项研究强调了支持年轻司机的必要性,特别是在他们刚刚获得驾照之后,重点是减少冒险行为。O.V.B.
{"title":"Journal Article Reviews.","authors":"Carol C Weitzman, Oana DeVinck-Baroody, Rachel M. Moore, Sarah S Nyp","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000713","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000713","url":null,"abstract":"ADHD Curry AE, Yerys BE, Metzger KB, et al. Traffic crashes, violations, and suspensions among young drivers with ADHD. Pediatrics. 2019;e20182305. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood disorder that often persists into adolescence, when driving typically begins for most. Recent studies have found first-crash involvement to be 36% higher among drivers with ADHD compared with other adolescents. Curry et al. conducted a large retrospective cohort study to compare monthly rates of overall and specific crash types, violations, and suspensions over the initial 4 years of licensure for adolescent drivers with and without ADHD. A cohort of primary care patients at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia born between 1987 and 1997 were examined with linkage of electronic health records and state traffic data. A total of 14,936 adolescents were included, and 12% had a diagnosis of ADHD. Curry et al. found that crash rates were higher for drivers with ADHD regardless of licensing age, especially during the first month of licensure (adjusted rate ratio [ARR]: 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18–2.23]). After adjusting for potential covariates and temporal trends, the 4-year crash rate of novice adolescent drivers with ADHD was 37% higher than that of drivers without ADHD (ARR 5 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26–1.48). Those with ADHD had 2.1 times higher rate of alcoholrelated crashes than that of drivers without ADHD, and in the first year of driving, the rate of alcohol and/or drug violations was 3.6 times higher for adolescents with ADHD. In addition, rates of moving violations were consistently higher for drivers with ADHD over the study period (at 48 months ARR: 1.47; [95% CI 1.36–1.58]). Information about the rates of medication use in this sample was not reported. This study highlights the need to support young drivers, particularly right after they obtain their license, with a focus on also decreasing risktaking behaviors. O.V.B.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74366169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bullying, School Violence, and Climate in Evolving Contexts 在不断变化的背景下欺凌、校园暴力和气候
Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000718
Meghan K. Breheney
with dyslexia: a review on current intervention methods. Med J Malaysia. 2018;73:311–320. 21. Hulme C, Snowling MJ. Reading disorders and dyslexia. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28:731–735. 22. Ozernov-palchik O, Gaab N. Tackling the ‘dyslexia paradox’: reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017;7:156–176. 23. Evans WN, Morrill MS, Parente ST. Measuring inappropriate medical diagnosis and treatment in survey data: the case of ADHD among school-age children. J Health Econ. 2010;29:657–673. 24. Bishop DVM. Ten questions about terminology for children with unexplained language problems. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014;49:381–415. 25. Copyright C, Brooks G, Burton M, et al. Downloaded on 2018-1101T20. 2007;54:36Z. 26. Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA, et al. Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children. Pediatrics. 2014;134:1013–1023. 27. Willcutt EG, Pennington BF. Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with reading disability. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2000;41:1039–1048. 28. Shemesh E, Annunziato RA, Ambrose MA, et al. Child and parental reports of bullying in a consecutive sample of children with food allergy. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e10–e17. 29. Stein JF. Does dyslexia exist? Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33:313–320. 30. Cortiella C, Horowitz S. The state of learning disabilities: facts, trends and emerging issues. Natl Cent Learn Disabil. 2014:1–52.
阅读障碍:当前干预方法综述。中华医学杂志,2018;33(3):391 - 391。21. Hulme C, Snowling MJ。阅读障碍和阅读障碍。中华儿科杂志,2016;28:731-735。22. 奥泽诺夫-帕尔奇克O, Gaab N.解决“阅读障碍悖论”:发展性阅读障碍早期标记的阅读大脑和行为。科学通报,2017;7(1):1 - 6。23. Evans WN, Morrill MS, Parente ST.调查数据中不适当医疗诊断和治疗的测量:学龄儿童ADHD病例。中华卫生杂志,2010;29:657-673。24. 主教数字式电压表。关于有无法解释的语言问题的儿童术语的十个问题。中华社会科学杂志,2014;49(1):381 - 415。25. 版权所有C,布鲁克斯G,伯顿M等。下载日期:2018-1101T20。2007; 54:36Z。26. Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA等。过度诊断:我们的诊断强迫症是如何伤害孩子的。儿科。2014;134:1013 - 1023。27. 威尔卡特EG,彭宁顿BF。儿童和青少年阅读障碍的精神合并症。[J] .中华精神病学杂志。2000;41(1):1039 - 1048。28. Shemesh E, Annunziato RA, Ambrose MA,等。对食物过敏儿童的连续样本中儿童和家长报告的欺凌行为。儿科。2013;131:e10-e17。29. 斯坦摩根富林明。阅读障碍真的存在吗?中华神经科学杂志,2018;33(3):313 - 320。30.学习障碍的现状:事实、趋势和新出现的问题。儿童学习障碍。2014:1-52。
{"title":"Bullying, School Violence, and Climate in Evolving Contexts","authors":"Meghan K. Breheney","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000718","url":null,"abstract":"with dyslexia: a review on current intervention methods. Med J Malaysia. 2018;73:311–320. 21. Hulme C, Snowling MJ. Reading disorders and dyslexia. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28:731–735. 22. Ozernov-palchik O, Gaab N. Tackling the ‘dyslexia paradox’: reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017;7:156–176. 23. Evans WN, Morrill MS, Parente ST. Measuring inappropriate medical diagnosis and treatment in survey data: the case of ADHD among school-age children. J Health Econ. 2010;29:657–673. 24. Bishop DVM. Ten questions about terminology for children with unexplained language problems. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014;49:381–415. 25. Copyright C, Brooks G, Burton M, et al. Downloaded on 2018-1101T20. 2007;54:36Z. 26. Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA, et al. Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children. Pediatrics. 2014;134:1013–1023. 27. Willcutt EG, Pennington BF. Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with reading disability. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2000;41:1039–1048. 28. Shemesh E, Annunziato RA, Ambrose MA, et al. Child and parental reports of bullying in a consecutive sample of children with food allergy. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e10–e17. 29. Stein JF. Does dyslexia exist? Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33:313–320. 30. Cortiella C, Horowitz S. The state of learning disabilities: facts, trends and emerging issues. Natl Cent Learn Disabil. 2014:1–52.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74436592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Autism-Related Health and Educational Services. 自闭症相关健康和教育服务的种族和民族差异。
Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000700
L. Bilaver, J. Havlicek
OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study is to measure racial and ethnic disparities in autism-related services among U.S. children with parent-reported autism spectrum disorder (ASD).METHODSUsing the 2011 Survey of Pathways to Diagnosis and Services, we analyzed parent-reported data on 1420 children with current ASD in the nationally representative sample. An estimation method consistent with the Institute of Medicine's definition of health care disparities is used to measure racial and ethnic disparities.RESULTSThe findings revealed Latino-white disparities in the percentage of children currently using school-based occupational and physical therapy and Latino-white and "other race"-white disparities in the percentage of children using physical therapy outside of school. There were no statistically significant black-white disparities. Instead, the study found that the percentage of black children with ASD receiving school-based services was 8 points higher than that of white children (p < 0.04). Factors unrelated to the need for autism services were largely unassociated with the receipt of services.CONCLUSIONThe findings provide a partial baseline and identify a need for further examination of the source of existing disparities and the lack of disparities found for specific services and minority groups.
本研究的目的是衡量美国父母报告的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童在自闭症相关服务方面的种族和民族差异。方法使用2011年的诊断和服务途径调查,我们分析了1420名具有全国代表性的ASD患儿的家长报告数据。一种与医学研究所对医疗保健差异的定义一致的估计方法被用于衡量种族和民族差异。结果调查结果显示,目前在学校接受职业和物理治疗的儿童中,拉丁裔白人的比例存在差异,在校外接受物理治疗的儿童中,拉丁裔白人和“其他种族”白人的比例存在差异。统计上没有明显的黑人和白人的差异。相反,研究发现患有自闭症的黑人儿童接受学校服务的比例比白人儿童高8个百分点(p < 0.04)。与自闭症服务需求无关的因素在很大程度上与接受服务无关。结论:研究结果提供了部分基线,并确定需要进一步检查现有差异的来源,以及在特定服务和少数群体中没有发现差异。
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Autism-Related Health and Educational Services.","authors":"L. Bilaver, J. Havlicek","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000700","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\u0000The objective of this study is to measure racial and ethnic disparities in autism-related services among U.S. children with parent-reported autism spectrum disorder (ASD).\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000Using the 2011 Survey of Pathways to Diagnosis and Services, we analyzed parent-reported data on 1420 children with current ASD in the nationally representative sample. An estimation method consistent with the Institute of Medicine's definition of health care disparities is used to measure racial and ethnic disparities.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000The findings revealed Latino-white disparities in the percentage of children currently using school-based occupational and physical therapy and Latino-white and \"other race\"-white disparities in the percentage of children using physical therapy outside of school. There were no statistically significant black-white disparities. Instead, the study found that the percentage of black children with ASD receiving school-based services was 8 points higher than that of white children (p < 0.04). Factors unrelated to the need for autism services were largely unassociated with the receipt of services.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000The findings provide a partial baseline and identify a need for further examination of the source of existing disparities and the lack of disparities found for specific services and minority groups.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74646730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Traumatogenic Potential of Federal Policy in the Lives of Children. 联邦政策在儿童生活中的创伤性潜能。
Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000716
Kristen R. Choi, M. Easterlin, M. Szilagyi
Decades of epidemiological and clinical research have demonstrated that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have long-lasting, harmful effects on health across the life span. Studies of adults and children find high rates of ACEs and strong evidence for their link to poor mental health, physical health, behavior, and social development. There is a higher burden of ACEs among populations that are already vulnerable, such as racial/ ethnic minorities, low-income or underemployed families, and sexual minorities. ACEs can lead to poor health and social outcomes (e.g., chronic illness, substance use, homelessness, violence victimization, and poverty) by producing toxic stress and dysregulating child development. ACEs classically include abuse, neglect, and other kinds of within-household dysfunction; however, in recent years, there has been growing recognition of adverse experiences outside the home (such as bullying, racism, and community violence) that can also produce deleterious outcomes. Adverse community environments often co-occur with—or are the foundation for— within-household ACEs, creating a “pair of ACEs” inside and outside the home that compound risk. Experiences of adverse community environments are now often included in contemporary conceptualizations of ACEs in both research and practice. When ACEs of either kind are severe, repetitive, or prolonged and produce a sustained toxic stress response—especially in the absence of loving caregiver relationships that buffer toxic stress —they can have profound, harmful effects. Childhood adversity has been studied in the context of immediate family and community environments in the existing ACE literature, but there is a need to consider a more upstream question: What creates the conditions necessary for childhood adversity to thrive in families and communities? Social determinants of health (e.g., inequality, racism, poverty, neighborhood safety, and access to social or health resources) and policy (i.e., local, state, and federal law) can play a central role in creating these conditions. To fully understand childhood adversity, we must understand the broader, upstream context in which ACEs develop and consider upstream interventions. This includes consideration for social determinants and policies that shape a child’s lived environment and lead to increased risk of ACEs both inside and outside the home. In the United States, we contend that federal policy actions—or, in some cases, inactions—have introduced new pathways for experiences of adversity into the lives of children. We note 5 particular areas of policy in the current US political context that have potential to expose children to adversity and warrant a policy advocacy response from pediatric professionals:
数十年的流行病学和临床研究表明,童年不良经历(ace)对整个生命周期的健康都有长期的有害影响。对成人和儿童的研究发现,ace的发病率很高,并且有强有力的证据表明,ace与心理健康、身体健康、行为和社会发展状况不佳有关。在已经脆弱的人群中,如种族/少数民族、低收入或就业不足的家庭以及性少数群体,ace的负担更高。不良反应可通过产生有毒压力和儿童发育失调,导致不良的健康和社会后果(例如,慢性病、药物使用、无家可归、暴力受害和贫困)。ace通常包括虐待、忽视和其他类型的家庭内部功能障碍;然而,近年来,越来越多的人认识到家庭以外的不良经历(如欺凌、种族主义和社区暴力)也会产生有害的结果。不利的社区环境往往与家庭中的ace同时发生,或者是其基础,在家庭内外形成“一对ace”,从而使风险复杂化。在研究和实践中,不良社区环境的经验现在经常包含在当代ace的概念中。当任何一种ace都是严重的、重复的或长期的,并产生持续的有毒压力反应——特别是在缺乏爱的照顾者关系来缓冲有毒压力的情况下——它们可能会产生深远的有害影响。在现有的ACE文献中,童年逆境已经在直系家庭和社区环境的背景下进行了研究,但有必要考虑一个更上游的问题:是什么创造了童年逆境在家庭和社区中茁壮成长的必要条件?健康的社会决定因素(如不平等、种族主义、贫困、邻里安全以及获得社会或卫生资源)和政策(即地方、州和联邦法律)可在创造这些条件方面发挥核心作用。为了充分了解童年逆境,我们必须了解ace形成的更广泛的上游背景,并考虑上游干预措施。这包括考虑影响儿童生活环境的社会决定因素和政策,这些因素会导致家庭内外发生ace的风险增加。在美国,我们认为,联邦政策的行动——或者,在某些情况下,无所作为——已经为儿童的生活引入了逆境经历的新途径。我们注意到,在当前的美国政治背景下,有5个特定的政策领域有可能使儿童面临逆境,需要儿科专业人士的政策倡导回应:
{"title":"Traumatogenic Potential of Federal Policy in the Lives of Children.","authors":"Kristen R. Choi, M. Easterlin, M. Szilagyi","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000716","url":null,"abstract":"Decades of epidemiological and clinical research have demonstrated that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have long-lasting, harmful effects on health across the life span. Studies of adults and children find high rates of ACEs and strong evidence for their link to poor mental health, physical health, behavior, and social development. There is a higher burden of ACEs among populations that are already vulnerable, such as racial/ ethnic minorities, low-income or underemployed families, and sexual minorities. ACEs can lead to poor health and social outcomes (e.g., chronic illness, substance use, homelessness, violence victimization, and poverty) by producing toxic stress and dysregulating child development. ACEs classically include abuse, neglect, and other kinds of within-household dysfunction; however, in recent years, there has been growing recognition of adverse experiences outside the home (such as bullying, racism, and community violence) that can also produce deleterious outcomes. Adverse community environments often co-occur with—or are the foundation for— within-household ACEs, creating a “pair of ACEs” inside and outside the home that compound risk. Experiences of adverse community environments are now often included in contemporary conceptualizations of ACEs in both research and practice. When ACEs of either kind are severe, repetitive, or prolonged and produce a sustained toxic stress response—especially in the absence of loving caregiver relationships that buffer toxic stress —they can have profound, harmful effects. Childhood adversity has been studied in the context of immediate family and community environments in the existing ACE literature, but there is a need to consider a more upstream question: What creates the conditions necessary for childhood adversity to thrive in families and communities? Social determinants of health (e.g., inequality, racism, poverty, neighborhood safety, and access to social or health resources) and policy (i.e., local, state, and federal law) can play a central role in creating these conditions. To fully understand childhood adversity, we must understand the broader, upstream context in which ACEs develop and consider upstream interventions. This includes consideration for social determinants and policies that shape a child’s lived environment and lead to increased risk of ACEs both inside and outside the home. In the United States, we contend that federal policy actions—or, in some cases, inactions—have introduced new pathways for experiences of adversity into the lives of children. We note 5 particular areas of policy in the current US political context that have potential to expose children to adversity and warrant a policy advocacy response from pediatric professionals:","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82246571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Ethnic Disparities in Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening and Referral: Implications for Pediatric Practice. 自闭症谱系障碍筛查和转诊的种族差异:对儿科实践的影响。
Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000691
K. Rea, Melissa Armstrong-Brine, Lisa Y. Ramirez, T. Stancin
OBJECTIVEAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening completion rates are often low despite their validity and influence on earlier intervention and positive treatment outcomes. This study sought to examine the use of one ASD screening tool, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised (MCHAT-R), in a racially and ethnically diverse urban pediatric clinic to review potential disparities within screening rates and referral practices.METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted for children (N = 999) within the ages of 17 to 34 months seen for a well-child appointment at one of 3 pediatric clinics: a general pediatric clinic, resident pediatric clinic, and Hispanic pediatric clinic.RESULTSMCHAT-R screening completion rates were low for all clinics. There were no significant differences in MCHAT-R screening completion based on ethnicity; however, the percentage of children screening positive on the MCHAT-R was significantly higher for Hispanic versus non-Hispanic children. Referral practices were highly variable across positive screenings, and few children received the appropriate combination of referrals.CONCLUSIONEthnic disparities in ASD positive screening rates and inconsistent referrals represent a critical issue in current pediatric practice. There is a great need for the development of more culturally sensitive ASD screening instruments. Additionally, to help increase ASD screening rate and accuracy, as well as consistency in referrals, greater emphasis is needed on professional training, parental education, and technology use within pediatric clinics.
目的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)筛查的完成率通常较低,尽管其有效性和对早期干预和积极治疗结果的影响。本研究试图在一个种族和民族多样化的城市儿科诊所中检查一种自闭症筛查工具——《幼儿自闭症修订检查表》(MCHAT-R)的使用情况,以审查筛查率和转诊实践中的潜在差异。方法回顾性分析在3家儿科诊所(普通儿科诊所、住院儿科诊所和西班牙儿科诊所)就诊的年龄在17 - 34个月的儿童(N = 999)。结果所有诊所的smchat - r筛查完成率均较低。MCHAT-R筛查完成情况在种族上无显著差异;然而,西班牙裔儿童的MCHAT-R筛查阳性比例明显高于非西班牙裔儿童。转诊做法在阳性筛查中变化很大,很少有儿童得到适当的转诊组合。结论:ASD阳性筛查率的种族差异和不一致的转诊是当前儿科实践中的一个关键问题。我们非常需要开发更具文化敏感性的ASD筛查工具。此外,为了帮助提高自闭症谱系障碍筛查率和准确性,以及转诊的一致性,需要更加重视儿科诊所的专业培训、父母教育和技术使用。
{"title":"Ethnic Disparities in Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening and Referral: Implications for Pediatric Practice.","authors":"K. Rea, Melissa Armstrong-Brine, Lisa Y. Ramirez, T. Stancin","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000691","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000691","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\u0000Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening completion rates are often low despite their validity and influence on earlier intervention and positive treatment outcomes. This study sought to examine the use of one ASD screening tool, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised (MCHAT-R), in a racially and ethnically diverse urban pediatric clinic to review potential disparities within screening rates and referral practices.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A retrospective chart review was conducted for children (N = 999) within the ages of 17 to 34 months seen for a well-child appointment at one of 3 pediatric clinics: a general pediatric clinic, resident pediatric clinic, and Hispanic pediatric clinic.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000MCHAT-R screening completion rates were low for all clinics. There were no significant differences in MCHAT-R screening completion based on ethnicity; however, the percentage of children screening positive on the MCHAT-R was significantly higher for Hispanic versus non-Hispanic children. Referral practices were highly variable across positive screenings, and few children received the appropriate combination of referrals.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Ethnic disparities in ASD positive screening rates and inconsistent referrals represent a critical issue in current pediatric practice. There is a great need for the development of more culturally sensitive ASD screening instruments. Additionally, to help increase ASD screening rate and accuracy, as well as consistency in referrals, greater emphasis is needed on professional training, parental education, and technology use within pediatric clinics.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73763407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Transitions, Suicidality, and Underappreciated Autism Spectrum Disorder in a High School Student. 高中生自闭症谱系障碍的转变、自杀倾向和未被充分认识。
Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000717
M. Ignaszewski, Kaizad R. Munshi, Jason M. Fogler, M. Augustyn
CASE Alex is a 14-year-old Portuguese-American boy with a psychiatric history starting at age 5 who presents to your primary care practice after an insurance change.He was delivered prematurely at 32 weeks and diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism at the age of 6 weeks and growth hormone deficiency at the age of 2 years; he is in active treatment for both. He otherwise met developmental milestones on time yet continues to have significant fatigue despite adequate sleep and vitamin D supplementation.His family history is remarkable for maternal anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and previous attempted suicide, as well as anxiety, alcoholism, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the extended family.Alex has had multiple psychiatric diagnoses by sequential providers. He was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and ADHD by 5 years of age, major depressive disorder by 11 years of age, persistent depressive disorder by 12 years of age, and ultimately disruptive mood dysregulation disorder because of severe and persistent temper outbursts associated with negative mood and behavioral dysregulation, leading to recurrent crisis evaluations. He has been psychiatrically hospitalized twice, in the fifth and seventh grade, for suicidal ideation (SI) and elopement from home, respectively. He recently completed a 2-week acute residential placement, during which no medication changes were made. Current medications include escitalopram 20 mg daily, guanfacine 1 mg 3 times daily, sustained release bupropion 100 mg twice daily, levothyroxine, vitamin D, and a weekly somatropin injection. He has not been able to tolerate psychostimulants or nonstimulant agents because of treatment-emergent SI.Now in the ninth grade, he continues to be easily distracted by peers, with impulsive behaviors and reduced self-regulation. Despite receiving special education services since the fifth grade, his academic performance has been poor, and he has limited motivation. Previous testing indicated average in an intelligence quotient test, with relative deficits in working memory compared with above average strength in fluid reasoning. He dislikes school and has few friends. He has always been noted to be "immature." He displays temper tantrums at home and school around transitions and behavioral expectations and has complained of feeling "different" and misunderstood by peers in addition to having difficulty reading social cues. His interests include acting and playing Fortnite and other video/computer games. His screen time is limited to 1 to 2 hr/d by the family.As the new clinician, you raise the possibility of undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder as a unifying/underlying diagnosis with his mother, who disagrees and does not consent to additional workup despite your recommendations. How would you proceed with next steps to best support your patient and his family in obtaining further clarifying evaluation?
亚历克斯是一个14岁的葡萄牙裔美国男孩,从5岁开始就有精神病史,他在保险变更后来到你的初级保健诊所。他在32周早产,6周时被诊断为先天性甲状腺功能减退,2岁时被诊断为生长激素缺乏症;他正在积极治疗这两种疾病。除此之外,他按时达到了发育的里程碑,尽管有充足的睡眠和维生素D补充,但他仍然有明显的疲劳。他的家族史有显著的母亲焦虑、抑郁、自杀念头和自杀未遂,以及在大家庭中有焦虑、酗酒、抑郁和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)。亚历克斯有过多次精神病诊断。他在5岁时被诊断为广泛性焦虑障碍和多动症,11岁时被诊断为重度抑郁症,12岁时被诊断为持续性抑郁症,最终被诊断为破坏性情绪失调障碍,因为严重和持续的脾气爆发与消极情绪和行为失调有关,导致反复的危机评估。他曾在5年级和7年级两次因自杀意念(SI)和离家出走被送进精神病院。他最近完成了为期两周的急性住院治疗,在此期间没有进行任何药物改变。目前的药物包括艾司西酞普兰20毫克/天,胍法辛1毫克/天3次,缓释安非他酮100毫克/天2次,左旋甲状腺素,维生素D,每周注射一次生长激素。由于治疗引发的SI,他不能耐受精神兴奋剂或非兴奋剂药物。现在已经九年级了,他仍然很容易被同龄人分散注意力,行为冲动,自我调节能力下降。尽管从五年级开始接受特殊教育,但他的学习成绩一直很差,而且他的动力有限。先前的测试显示,智商测试成绩一般,工作记忆相对不足,而流体推理能力高于平均水平。他不喜欢上学,也没有什么朋友。他一直被认为是“不成熟的”。在家里和学校,每当遇到过渡和行为期望时,他都会发脾气,他抱怨自己感觉“与众不同”,被同龄人误解,除此之外,他还在阅读社交暗示方面有困难。他的兴趣包括表演、玩《堡垒之夜》和其他视频/电脑游戏。他每天看屏幕的时间被家人限制在1到2小时。作为一名新的临床医生,你向他的母亲提出了未确诊的自闭症谱系障碍的可能性,作为一种统一的/潜在的诊断,尽管你提出了建议,但她不同意也不同意进行额外的检查。您将如何进行下一步工作,以最好地支持您的患者及其家属获得进一步的明确评估?
{"title":"Transitions, Suicidality, and Underappreciated Autism Spectrum Disorder in a High School Student.","authors":"M. Ignaszewski, Kaizad R. Munshi, Jason M. Fogler, M. Augustyn","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000717","url":null,"abstract":"CASE Alex is a 14-year-old Portuguese-American boy with a psychiatric history starting at age 5 who presents to your primary care practice after an insurance change.He was delivered prematurely at 32 weeks and diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism at the age of 6 weeks and growth hormone deficiency at the age of 2 years; he is in active treatment for both. He otherwise met developmental milestones on time yet continues to have significant fatigue despite adequate sleep and vitamin D supplementation.His family history is remarkable for maternal anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and previous attempted suicide, as well as anxiety, alcoholism, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the extended family.Alex has had multiple psychiatric diagnoses by sequential providers. He was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and ADHD by 5 years of age, major depressive disorder by 11 years of age, persistent depressive disorder by 12 years of age, and ultimately disruptive mood dysregulation disorder because of severe and persistent temper outbursts associated with negative mood and behavioral dysregulation, leading to recurrent crisis evaluations. He has been psychiatrically hospitalized twice, in the fifth and seventh grade, for suicidal ideation (SI) and elopement from home, respectively. He recently completed a 2-week acute residential placement, during which no medication changes were made. Current medications include escitalopram 20 mg daily, guanfacine 1 mg 3 times daily, sustained release bupropion 100 mg twice daily, levothyroxine, vitamin D, and a weekly somatropin injection. He has not been able to tolerate psychostimulants or nonstimulant agents because of treatment-emergent SI.Now in the ninth grade, he continues to be easily distracted by peers, with impulsive behaviors and reduced self-regulation. Despite receiving special education services since the fifth grade, his academic performance has been poor, and he has limited motivation. Previous testing indicated average in an intelligence quotient test, with relative deficits in working memory compared with above average strength in fluid reasoning. He dislikes school and has few friends. He has always been noted to be \"immature.\" He displays temper tantrums at home and school around transitions and behavioral expectations and has complained of feeling \"different\" and misunderstood by peers in addition to having difficulty reading social cues. His interests include acting and playing Fortnite and other video/computer games. His screen time is limited to 1 to 2 hr/d by the family.As the new clinician, you raise the possibility of undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder as a unifying/underlying diagnosis with his mother, who disagrees and does not consent to additional workup despite your recommendations. How would you proceed with next steps to best support your patient and his family in obtaining further clarifying evaluation?","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76950948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Characterizing the Learning-to-Drive Period for Teens with Attention Deficits. 青少年注意力缺陷的学习驾驶期特征。
Pub Date : 2019-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000706
H. Bishop, A. Curry, D. Stavrinos, J. Mirman
OBJECTIVEMotor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death among teenagers, accounting for approximately 1 in 3 deaths for this age group. A number of factors increase crash risk for teen drivers, including vulnerability to distraction, poor judgment, propensity to engage in risky driving behaviors, and inexperience. These factors may be of particular concern and exacerbated among teens learning to drive with attention deficits. To our knowledge, our study is among the first to systematically investigate the experiences of novice adolescent drivers with attention deficits during the learner period of a Graduated Drivers Licensing program.METHODSurvey and on-road driving assessment (ODA) data were used to examine parent and teen confidence in the teens' driving ability, driving practice frequency, diversity of driving practice environments, and driving errors among teens with attention deficits as defined by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis or parent-reported trouble staying focused (TSF).RESULTSWhen teens' driving skill was evaluated at the conclusion of the learner period, teens with ADHD exhibited more driving errors than their typically developing (TD) counterparts (p = 0.034). Teens with TSF were more likely to have their ODA terminated (p = 0.019), had marginally lower overall driving scores (p = 0.098), and exhibited more critical driving errors (p = 0.01) compared with TD teens.CONCLUSIONThese findings may have implications on the learning-to-drive period for adolescents with attention deficits. Adjustments may need to be made to the learner period for teens with attention deficits to account for attention impairments and to better instill safe driving behavior.
目的机动车辆碰撞是青少年死亡的主要原因,约占该年龄组死亡人数的三分之一。许多因素增加了青少年司机的撞车风险,包括容易分心,判断力差,倾向于从事危险的驾驶行为,以及缺乏经验。这些因素在注意力不集中的青少年学习开车时尤其令人担忧。据我们所知,我们的研究是第一个系统地调查在毕业驾驶执照计划学习期间有注意力缺陷的青少年新手司机的经历的研究之一。方法采用问卷调查和道路驾驶评估(ODA)数据,考察父母和青少年对青少年驾驶能力、驾驶练习频率、驾驶练习环境多样性和驾驶失误的信心,并对ADHD(注意缺陷/多动障碍)或TSF(父母报告的注意力集中困难)的青少年进行评估。结果在学习期结束时对青少年驾驶技能进行评估时,ADHD青少年的驾驶失误比正常发育(TD)青少年多(p = 0.034)。与TD青少年相比,TSF青少年更有可能终止ODA (p = 0.019),总体驾驶分数略低(p = 0.098),并且表现出更多的严重驾驶错误(p = 0.01)。结论本研究结果对注意缺陷青少年的驾驶学习期有一定的指导意义。可能需要对有注意力缺陷的青少年的学习期进行调整,以解释注意力障碍,并更好地灌输安全的驾驶行为。
{"title":"Characterizing the Learning-to-Drive Period for Teens with Attention Deficits.","authors":"H. Bishop, A. Curry, D. Stavrinos, J. Mirman","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000706","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000706","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\u0000Motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death among teenagers, accounting for approximately 1 in 3 deaths for this age group. A number of factors increase crash risk for teen drivers, including vulnerability to distraction, poor judgment, propensity to engage in risky driving behaviors, and inexperience. These factors may be of particular concern and exacerbated among teens learning to drive with attention deficits. To our knowledge, our study is among the first to systematically investigate the experiences of novice adolescent drivers with attention deficits during the learner period of a Graduated Drivers Licensing program.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHOD\u0000Survey and on-road driving assessment (ODA) data were used to examine parent and teen confidence in the teens' driving ability, driving practice frequency, diversity of driving practice environments, and driving errors among teens with attention deficits as defined by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis or parent-reported trouble staying focused (TSF).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000When teens' driving skill was evaluated at the conclusion of the learner period, teens with ADHD exhibited more driving errors than their typically developing (TD) counterparts (p = 0.034). Teens with TSF were more likely to have their ODA terminated (p = 0.019), had marginally lower overall driving scores (p = 0.098), and exhibited more critical driving errors (p = 0.01) compared with TD teens.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000These findings may have implications on the learning-to-drive period for adolescents with attention deficits. Adjustments may need to be made to the learner period for teens with attention deficits to account for attention impairments and to better instill safe driving behavior.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84998427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Disruptive Behaviors, and Drug Shortage. 注意缺陷多动障碍、破坏性行为与药物短缺。
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000705
Elizabeth Hastings, Jennifer K. Poon, S. Robert, Sarah S Nyp
CASEKyle is a 10-year-old boy with Down syndrome and intellectual disability who is being followed up by a developmental behavioral pediatrician for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety. Kyle was initially taking a long-acting liquid formulation of methylphenidate for ADHD and fluoxetine for anxiety. Several months ago, the liquid formulation was on back order, and the methylphenidate formulation was changed to an equal dose of a long-acting capsule. Kyle is not able to swallow pills; therefore, the contents of the capsule were sprinkled onto 1 bite of yogurt each morning. Over the course of the next month, Kyle's behaviors became increasingly difficult. He was not able to tolerate loud or crowded places, and despite a visual schedule and warnings, he would become aggressive toward adults when directed to transition away from preferred activities. Fluoxetine was increased from 0.4 to 0.6 mg/kg/day at that time.One month later, his parents reported that although there may have been slight improvement in Kyle's irritability since the increase in fluoxetine, they felt he was nonetheless more aggressive and less cooperative than his previous baseline. Kyle was returned to the long-acting liquid formulation of methylphenidate at that time, and a follow-up was scheduled 2 weeks later.On return to clinic, his parents reported that Kyle's behaviors had continued to become increasingly difficult. He was described as uncooperative and aggressive at home and school. Kyle was easily upset any time he was not given his way, his behavior was corrected, or he felt that he was not the center of attention. When upset, he would yell, bite, kick, spit, or throw his body to the ground and refuse to move. At 110 pounds, Kyle's parents were no longer able to physically move his body when he dropped to the ground. This was a safety concern for his parents because he had displayed this behavior in the parking lot of a busy shopping area. Because of Kyle's aggressive and unpredictable behavior, parents no longer felt comfortable taking him to public places. Family members who had previously been comfortable staying with Kyle while his parents were out for short periods would no longer stay with him. Overall, the behaviors resulted in parents being unable to go to dinner as a couple or provide individual attention to their other children. The parents described the family as "on edge." How would you approach Kyle's management?
CASEKyle是一名患有唐氏综合症和智力残疾的10岁男孩,一名发育行为儿科医生正在跟进他的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和焦虑症。凯尔最初服用长效液体制剂哌醋甲酯治疗多动症,氟西汀治疗焦虑症。几个月前,液体制剂缺货,哌醋甲酯制剂被改为等量的长效胶囊。凯尔不能吞下药片;因此,胶囊的内容物每天早上撒在一口酸奶上。在接下来的一个月里,凯尔的行为变得越来越困难。他不能忍受嘈杂或拥挤的地方,尽管有视觉上的时间表和警告,但当他被要求离开喜欢的活动时,他会变得对成年人有攻击性。当时氟西汀从0.4 mg/kg/天增加到0.6 mg/kg/天。一个月后,他的父母报告说,虽然自从氟西汀的剂量增加以来,凯尔的易怒症状可能略有改善,但他们觉得他比以前的基线更有攻击性,更不愿意合作。当时,凯尔再次服用长效液体制剂哌甲酯,并于2周后进行随访。回到诊所后,他的父母报告说,凯尔的行为变得越来越困难。在家庭和学校里,他被描述为不合作、好斗的人。凯尔很容易心烦意乱,只要他不被允许,他的行为被纠正,或者他觉得他不是关注的中心。心烦意乱时,他会大喊大叫、咬人、踢人、吐唾沫,或者把自己的身体摔倒在地,拒绝移动。当凯尔摔倒在地时,他的父母已经无法移动他的身体了。这对他的父母来说是一个安全问题,因为他在一个繁忙的购物区的停车场表现出了这种行为。由于凯尔的攻击性和不可预测的行为,父母们不再放心带他去公共场所。以前,当凯尔的父母短时间外出时,那些愿意和他呆在一起的家庭成员将不再和他呆在一起。总的来说,这些行为导致父母无法作为夫妻一起吃饭,也无法为其他孩子提供单独的关注。父母形容这个家庭“紧张不安”。你会如何对待凯尔的管理层?
{"title":"Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Disruptive Behaviors, and Drug Shortage.","authors":"Elizabeth Hastings, Jennifer K. Poon, S. Robert, Sarah S Nyp","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000705","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000705","url":null,"abstract":"CASE\u0000Kyle is a 10-year-old boy with Down syndrome and intellectual disability who is being followed up by a developmental behavioral pediatrician for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety. Kyle was initially taking a long-acting liquid formulation of methylphenidate for ADHD and fluoxetine for anxiety. Several months ago, the liquid formulation was on back order, and the methylphenidate formulation was changed to an equal dose of a long-acting capsule. Kyle is not able to swallow pills; therefore, the contents of the capsule were sprinkled onto 1 bite of yogurt each morning. Over the course of the next month, Kyle's behaviors became increasingly difficult. He was not able to tolerate loud or crowded places, and despite a visual schedule and warnings, he would become aggressive toward adults when directed to transition away from preferred activities. Fluoxetine was increased from 0.4 to 0.6 mg/kg/day at that time.One month later, his parents reported that although there may have been slight improvement in Kyle's irritability since the increase in fluoxetine, they felt he was nonetheless more aggressive and less cooperative than his previous baseline. Kyle was returned to the long-acting liquid formulation of methylphenidate at that time, and a follow-up was scheduled 2 weeks later.On return to clinic, his parents reported that Kyle's behaviors had continued to become increasingly difficult. He was described as uncooperative and aggressive at home and school. Kyle was easily upset any time he was not given his way, his behavior was corrected, or he felt that he was not the center of attention. When upset, he would yell, bite, kick, spit, or throw his body to the ground and refuse to move. At 110 pounds, Kyle's parents were no longer able to physically move his body when he dropped to the ground. This was a safety concern for his parents because he had displayed this behavior in the parking lot of a busy shopping area. Because of Kyle's aggressive and unpredictable behavior, parents no longer felt comfortable taking him to public places. Family members who had previously been comfortable staying with Kyle while his parents were out for short periods would no longer stay with him. Overall, the behaviors resulted in parents being unable to go to dinner as a couple or provide individual attention to their other children. The parents described the family as \"on edge.\" How would you approach Kyle's management?","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80792175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tourette Syndrome has Substantial Impact in Childhood and Adulthood As Well. 抽动秽语综合症对儿童和成年也有重大影响。
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000699
I. Malaty, D. Shineman, M. Himle
Irene Malaty, MD,* Diana Shineman, PhD,† Michael Himle, PhD‡ It was with great interest that we read the study by Wolicki et al., “Children with Tourette Syndrome in the United States: Parent-Reported Diagnosis, Co-Occurring Disorders, Severity, and Influence of Activities on Tics.” The Tourette Association of America (TAA) recently embarked upon a similar project, the 2018 TAA Impact Survey, which involved an online survey of their constituents. Similar to the study of Wolicki, the purpose of the TAA Impact Survey was to better understand the diagnostic and treatment experiences of individuals living with Tourette Syndrome (TS) and other tic disorders (TDs) as well as to understand the broad impact of tics on health and functioning. Despite key methodological and sample differences, the TAA Impact Survey corroborates a number of findings in the study of Wolicki and when examined in conjunction, provides for the complimentary and comprehensive characterization of the longitudinal impact of TS across the life span. One key methodological difference between the studies was how participants were recruited. Although the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) used cold calls to identify households where currently residing children had been diagnosed with TS, the TAA created a webbased survey disseminated to its constituents through the TAA website, email lists, and social media, as well as through the TAA Centers of Excellence program. Both methods allowed for geographic diversity, but the webbased technique allowed for acquisition of a large number of respondents (N 5 944, including 281 adults with TS/TD and 623 parents of children with TS/TD). The cold call method may have offered the advantage of less bias toward individuals associated with a TS society or comfortable with internet-based communication, whereas there may be other bias toward willing participants in phone surveys. Furthermore, the TAA Impact Survey expands upon the CDC survey by including both children with TS/TD, for whom parents completed the survey, and additionally adults with TS/TD, who selfreported about their experiences. Importantly, although the CDC survey asks only about the diagnosis of TS, the TAA Impact Survey included the broader range of TD diagnoses in addition to TS. Despite their methodological differences, the 2 studies found some consistent noteworthy findings. Encouragingly, both studies suggest that diagnosis is being made earlier. Among adults in our study, the modal time between tic onset and diagnosis was 61 years (reported by 53% of the sample), with only 32.4% being diagnosed within 2 years of tic onset. By contrast, the modal time between symptom onset and diagnosis for children was ,2 years (reported by 70.9% of the sample), which is consistent with the study of Wolicki, who reported an average time to diagnosis of 1.7 years. Consistent with the findings of Wolicki et al. regarding a high reliance on specialists to make the diagnosis (51.8% of cases), the TAA
Irene Malaty, MD,* Diana Shineman, PhD,†Michael Himle, PhD .我们怀着极大的兴趣阅读了Wolicki等人的研究,“美国患有抽动秽语综合症的儿童:父母报告的诊断,共同发生的疾病,严重程度和活动对抽动秽语的影响。”美国妥瑞氏症协会(TAA)最近启动了一个类似的项目,即2018年TAA影响调查,其中包括对其成员进行在线调查。与Wolicki的研究类似,TAA影响调查的目的是更好地了解抽动症(TS)和其他抽动障碍(td)患者的诊断和治疗经历,以及抽动症对健康和功能的广泛影响。尽管关键的方法和样本存在差异,但TAA影响调查证实了Wolicki研究中的一些发现,并且当结合起来进行检查时,提供了TS在整个生命周期中纵向影响的互补和全面特征。两项研究在方法论上的一个关键区别在于参与者的招募方式。虽然疾病控制中心(CDC)使用陌生电话来确定目前居住的儿童被诊断患有TS的家庭,但TAA创建了一个基于网络的调查,通过TAA网站、电子邮件列表、社交媒体以及TAA卓越中心项目向其成员传播。两种方法都考虑到地域的多样性,但基于网络的技术允许获得大量的受访者(N 5944,包括281名患有TS/TD的成年人和623名患有TS/TD的儿童的父母)。陌生电话方法的优势可能是对与TS社会有关的个人或对基于互联网的交流感到舒适的人较少偏见,而对愿意参加电话调查的人可能存在其他偏见。此外,TAA影响调查扩展了CDC的调查,包括父母完成调查的TS/TD儿童,以及自我报告其经历的TS/TD成人。重要的是,虽然CDC的调查只询问了TS的诊断,但TAA影响调查除了TS之外还包括了更广泛的TD诊断。尽管他们的方法不同,但两项研究发现了一些一致的值得注意的发现。令人鼓舞的是,这两项研究都表明,诊断越来越早。在我们的研究中,在抽动发作和诊断之间的成人时间为61年(53%的样本报告),只有32.4%的人在抽动发作的2年内被诊断出来。相比之下,儿童从症状发作到诊断的模态时间为2年(70.9%的样本报告),这与Wolicki的研究一致,他报告的平均诊断时间为1.7年。与Wolicki等人关于高度依赖专家做出诊断(51.8%的病例)的发现一致,TAA影响调查检查了诊断医生,发现TS/TD诊断最有可能由神经科医生(儿童71% /成人63%)或精神科医生(儿童11% /成人13%)而不是初级保健医生或其他精神/行为健康专家(各占15%的病例)做出。尽管诊断时间的明显改善令人鼓舞,但令人清醒的是,有效的治疗仍然不令人满意。TAA影响调查证实,药物仍然是常用处方,59%/51%(分别为儿童和成人)报告说他们目前正在服用治疗TS/TD的药物,29%/30%尝试过5种以上的药物;但只有44%/47%的人报告了他们的症状*来自佛罗里达州Gainsville的佛罗里达大学运动障碍中心神经内科;†美国妥瑞氏症协会,Bayside, NY;犹他州盐湖城犹他大学心理学系
{"title":"Tourette Syndrome has Substantial Impact in Childhood and Adulthood As Well.","authors":"I. Malaty, D. Shineman, M. Himle","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000699","url":null,"abstract":"Irene Malaty, MD,* Diana Shineman, PhD,† Michael Himle, PhD‡ It was with great interest that we read the study by Wolicki et al., “Children with Tourette Syndrome in the United States: Parent-Reported Diagnosis, Co-Occurring Disorders, Severity, and Influence of Activities on Tics.” The Tourette Association of America (TAA) recently embarked upon a similar project, the 2018 TAA Impact Survey, which involved an online survey of their constituents. Similar to the study of Wolicki, the purpose of the TAA Impact Survey was to better understand the diagnostic and treatment experiences of individuals living with Tourette Syndrome (TS) and other tic disorders (TDs) as well as to understand the broad impact of tics on health and functioning. Despite key methodological and sample differences, the TAA Impact Survey corroborates a number of findings in the study of Wolicki and when examined in conjunction, provides for the complimentary and comprehensive characterization of the longitudinal impact of TS across the life span. One key methodological difference between the studies was how participants were recruited. Although the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) used cold calls to identify households where currently residing children had been diagnosed with TS, the TAA created a webbased survey disseminated to its constituents through the TAA website, email lists, and social media, as well as through the TAA Centers of Excellence program. Both methods allowed for geographic diversity, but the webbased technique allowed for acquisition of a large number of respondents (N 5 944, including 281 adults with TS/TD and 623 parents of children with TS/TD). The cold call method may have offered the advantage of less bias toward individuals associated with a TS society or comfortable with internet-based communication, whereas there may be other bias toward willing participants in phone surveys. Furthermore, the TAA Impact Survey expands upon the CDC survey by including both children with TS/TD, for whom parents completed the survey, and additionally adults with TS/TD, who selfreported about their experiences. Importantly, although the CDC survey asks only about the diagnosis of TS, the TAA Impact Survey included the broader range of TD diagnoses in addition to TS. Despite their methodological differences, the 2 studies found some consistent noteworthy findings. Encouragingly, both studies suggest that diagnosis is being made earlier. Among adults in our study, the modal time between tic onset and diagnosis was 61 years (reported by 53% of the sample), with only 32.4% being diagnosed within 2 years of tic onset. By contrast, the modal time between symptom onset and diagnosis for children was ,2 years (reported by 70.9% of the sample), which is consistent with the study of Wolicki, who reported an average time to diagnosis of 1.7 years. Consistent with the findings of Wolicki et al. regarding a high reliance on specialists to make the diagnosis (51.8% of cases), the TAA ","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76799986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Screening for Both Child Behavior and Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Primary Care: Commentary. 在儿童初级保健中筛查儿童行为和健康的社会决定因素:评论。
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000709
E. Perrin
Ellen C. Perrin, MD This article provides encouraging data regarding routine systematic developmental screening in busy pediatric primary care practices. First, it demonstrates excellent use of quality improvement principles and methods to study the implementation of an innovative system for routine screening. Second, it shows that routine screening for emotional/behavioral symptoms and social determinants of health can be performed indeed complement each other. Third, it highlights some areas that will benefit from further innovation and research. The instruments used for emotional/behavioral symptom screening were the Pediatric Symptom Checklist for children 6 to 10 years old, the Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist for children 18 months to 5 years old, and the Baby Pediatric Symptom Checklist for infants (the latter 2 are components of the Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children, or SWYC: www.theswyc.org). Questions about social determinants of health and about the parent’s concerns are also components of the SWYC. Although the SWYC also includes components assessing the development of cognitive, language, and motor tasks, this realm was not included in the study.
Ellen C. Perrin,医学博士这篇文章提供了令人鼓舞的关于在繁忙的儿科初级保健实践中进行常规系统发育筛查的数据。首先,它很好地运用了质量改进的原则和方法来研究常规筛查创新系统的实施。其次,它表明,对情绪/行为症状和健康的社会决定因素的常规筛查确实可以相互补充。第三,它强调了一些将从进一步创新和研究中受益的领域。用于情绪/行为症状筛查的工具是6 - 10岁儿童的儿科症状检查表,18个月至5岁儿童的学龄前儿童症状检查表和婴儿儿科症状检查表(后两者是幼儿健康调查的组成部分,或SWYC: www.theswyc.org)。关于健康的社会决定因素和父母所关心的问题也是《社会责任公约》的组成部分。尽管SWYC也包括评估认知、语言和运动任务发展的成分,但这一领域并未包括在这项研究中。
{"title":"Screening for Both Child Behavior and Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Primary Care: Commentary.","authors":"E. Perrin","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000709","url":null,"abstract":"Ellen C. Perrin, MD This article provides encouraging data regarding routine systematic developmental screening in busy pediatric primary care practices. First, it demonstrates excellent use of quality improvement principles and methods to study the implementation of an innovative system for routine screening. Second, it shows that routine screening for emotional/behavioral symptoms and social determinants of health can be performed indeed complement each other. Third, it highlights some areas that will benefit from further innovation and research. The instruments used for emotional/behavioral symptom screening were the Pediatric Symptom Checklist for children 6 to 10 years old, the Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist for children 18 months to 5 years old, and the Baby Pediatric Symptom Checklist for infants (the latter 2 are components of the Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children, or SWYC: www.theswyc.org). Questions about social determinants of health and about the parent’s concerns are also components of the SWYC. Although the SWYC also includes components assessing the development of cognitive, language, and motor tasks, this realm was not included in the study.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89152415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1