首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General最新文献

英文 中文
Interdependent versus independent inconsistency: Cultural differences in how East Asian and Western people attribute hypocrisy. 相互依存与独立不一致:东亚人和西方人如何看待虚伪的文化差异。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001608
Minjae Seo, Shoko Watanabe, Young-Hoon Kim, Sean M Laurent

Humans worldwide have long deplored hypocrisy, a concept that has been mentioned in texts dating back 100-1,000 years (e.g., the Analects of Confucius, the Tao Te Ching, the Bible, and the Qur'an). However, what influences the extent of hypocrisy attribution or counts as hypocrisy may differ as a function of culture. Previous studies have shown that Westerners attribute greater hypocrisy for within-person attitude-behavior inconsistency than East Asians. Building on this, we predict that East Asians' (vs. Westerners') hypocrisy attribution is more heavily influenced by social relationships. Consistent with past research, this can lead to greater leniency. However, as we show, this can also result in the novel finding we present that attributions of mild-to-moderate hypocrisy are made even when no explicit within-person attitude-behavior inconsistency is present. Across six experiments, we found that Koreans (vs. participants from the United States) attributed more hypocrisy to attitude-contradicting behavior when the person enacting the behavior was not the person who stated the attitude but was someone who shared social bonds with that person (i.e., cross-person, within-relationship attitude-behavior inconsistency; "relational hypocrisy"). Specifically, Koreans attributed more hypocrisy than Americans when a child's behavior contradicted their parent's views (Experiments 1a and 1b) or when attitude-contradicting behavior was enacted by the child of a close friend (Experiment 2). Experiments 3-5 replicated the findings from Experiments 1-2 using additional social contexts (e.g., a spousal relationship). Supplementary analyses showed that differences in hypocrisy attribution between Americans and Koreans were mediated by cultural differences in their perceptions of shared responsibility within relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

全世界的人类长期以来都对虚伪深恶痛绝,早在 100-1000 年前的典籍(如《论语》、《道德经》、《圣经》和《古兰经》)中就提到过这一概念。然而,影响虚伪归因程度或将其视为虚伪的因素可能因文化而异。以往的研究表明,西方人对人与人之间态度与行为不一致的虚伪归因大于东亚人。在此基础上,我们预测东亚人(与西方人相比)的虚伪归因受社会关系的影响更大。与过去的研究一致,这可能会导致更宽松的态度。然而,正如我们所展示的那样,这也会导致我们提出的新发现,即即使在人与人之间没有明确的态度-行为不一致的情况下,也会产生轻度到中度的虚伪归因。在六次实验中,我们发现,当实施与态度相悖行为的人不是表明态度的人,而是与该人有共同社会关系的人(即跨人、关系内态度行为不一致;"关系型虚伪")时,韩国人(与来自美国的参与者相比)对态度相悖行为的虚伪性归因更多。具体来说,当孩子的行为与父母的观点相悖时(实验 1a 和 1b),或者当态度相悖的行为由亲密朋友的孩子实施时(实验 2),韩国人比美国人更倾向于认为孩子虚伪。实验 3-5 利用其他社会背景(如配偶关系)复制了实验 1-2 的结果。补充分析表明,美国人和韩国人在虚伪归因上的差异是由他们对人际关系中共同责任的文化差异所中介的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Interdependent versus independent inconsistency: Cultural differences in how East Asian and Western people attribute hypocrisy.","authors":"Minjae Seo, Shoko Watanabe, Young-Hoon Kim, Sean M Laurent","doi":"10.1037/xge0001608","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001608","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans worldwide have long deplored hypocrisy, a concept that has been mentioned in texts dating back 100-1,000 years (e.g., the Analects of Confucius, the Tao Te Ching, the Bible, and the Qur'an). However, what influences the extent of hypocrisy attribution or counts as hypocrisy may differ as a function of culture. Previous studies have shown that Westerners attribute greater hypocrisy for within-person attitude-behavior inconsistency than East Asians. Building on this, we predict that East Asians' (vs. Westerners') hypocrisy attribution is more heavily influenced by social relationships. Consistent with past research, this can lead to greater leniency. However, as we show, this can also result in the novel finding we present that attributions of mild-to-moderate hypocrisy are made even when no explicit within-person attitude-behavior inconsistency is present. Across six experiments, we found that Koreans (vs. participants from the United States) attributed more hypocrisy to attitude-contradicting behavior when the person enacting the behavior was not the person who stated the attitude but was someone who shared social bonds with that person (i.e., cross-person, within-relationship attitude-behavior inconsistency; \"relational hypocrisy\"). Specifically, Koreans attributed more hypocrisy than Americans when a child's behavior contradicted their parent's views (Experiments 1a and 1b) or when attitude-contradicting behavior was enacted by the child of a close friend (Experiment 2). Experiments 3-5 replicated the findings from Experiments 1-2 using additional social contexts (e.g., a spousal relationship). Supplementary analyses showed that differences in hypocrisy attribution between Americans and Koreans were mediated by cultural differences in their perceptions of shared responsibility within relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141457350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Independent influences of movement distance and visual distance on Fitts' law. 移动距离和视觉距离对费茨定律的独立影响。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001612
Naser Al-Fawakhiri, Samuel D McDougle

Fitts' Law is one among a small number of psychophysical laws. However, a fundamental variable in Fitts' Law-the movement distance, D-confounds two quantities: The physical distance the effector has to move to reach a goal, and the visually perceived distance to that goal. While these two quantities are functionally equivalent in everyday motor behavior, decoupling them might improve our understanding of the factors that shape speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Here, we leveraged the phenomenon of visuomotor gain adaptation to de-confound movement and visual distance during goal-directed reaching. We found that movement distance and visual distance can influence movement times, supporting a variant of Fitts' Law that considers both. The weighting of movement versus visual distance was modified by restricting movement range and degrading visual feedback. These results may reflect the role of sensory context in early stages of motor planning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

菲茨定律是少数心理物理定律之一。然而,菲茨定律中的一个基本变量--移动距离 D--包含两个量:运动者到达目标所需的物理距离,以及视觉感知到的目标距离。虽然这两个量在日常运动行为中的功能是等同的,但将它们分离开来可能会提高我们对速度-准确性权衡因素的理解。在这里,我们利用视觉运动增益适应现象来解构目标指向性伸手过程中的运动距离和视觉距离。我们发现,运动距离和视觉距离都会影响运动时间,这支持了菲茨定律的一个变体,即同时考虑运动距离和视觉距离。通过限制运动范围和降低视觉反馈,可以改变运动距离与视觉距离的权重。这些结果可能反映了感觉环境在运动规划早期阶段的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Independent influences of movement distance and visual distance on Fitts' law.","authors":"Naser Al-Fawakhiri, Samuel D McDougle","doi":"10.1037/xge0001612","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fitts' Law is one among a small number of psychophysical laws. However, a fundamental variable in Fitts' Law-the movement distance, <i>D</i>-confounds two quantities: The physical distance the effector has to move to reach a goal, and the visually perceived distance to that goal. While these two quantities are functionally equivalent in everyday motor behavior, decoupling them might improve our understanding of the factors that shape speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Here, we leveraged the phenomenon of visuomotor gain adaptation to de-confound movement and visual distance during goal-directed reaching. We found that movement distance and visual distance can influence movement times, supporting a variant of Fitts' Law that considers both. The weighting of movement versus visual distance was modified by restricting movement range and degrading visual feedback. These results may reflect the role of sensory context in early stages of motor planning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141457349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combining forecasts from advisors: The impact of advice independence and verbal versus numeric format. 结合顾问的预测:建议独立性和口头与数字格式的影响。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001611
Jeremy D Strueder, Paul D Windschitl

Past research on advice-taking has suggested that people are often insensitive to the level of advice independence when combining forecasts from advisors. However, this has primarily been tested for cases in which people receive numeric forecasts. Recent work by Mislavsky and Gaertig (2022) shows that people sometimes employ different strategies when combining verbal versus numeric forecasts about the likelihood of future events. Specifically, likelihood judgments based on two verbal forecasts (e.g., "rather likely") are more often extreme (relative to the forecasts) than are likelihood judgments based on two numeric forecasts (e.g., "70% probability"). The goal of the present research was to investigate whether advice-takers' use of combination strategies can be sensitive to advice independence when differences in independence are highly salient and whether sensitivity to advice independence depends on the format in which advice is given. In two studies, we found that advice-takers became more extreme with their own likelihood estimate when combining forecasts from advisors who use separate evidence, as opposed to the same evidence. We also found that two verbal forecasts generally resulted in more extreme combined likelihood estimates than two numeric forecasts. However, the results did not suggest that sensitivity to advice independence depends on the format of advice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

以往关于建议采纳的研究表明,人们在综合顾问的预测时,往往对建议的独立性不敏感。然而,这主要是在人们接受数字预测的情况下进行的测试。Mislavsky 和 Gaertig(2022 年)的最新研究表明,人们在结合有关未来事件可能性的口头预测和数字预测时,有时会采用不同的策略。具体来说,与基于两个数字预测的可能性判断(如 "70%的可能性")相比,基于两个口头预测的可能性判断(如 "相当可能")往往更极端(相对于预测而言)。本研究的目的是探究当独立性差异非常突出时,建议接受者使用组合策略是否会对建议独立性敏感,以及对建议独立性的敏感性是否取决于给出建议的形式。在两项研究中,我们发现,与使用相同证据的预测相比,在结合使用不同证据的顾问的预测时,建议接受者对自己的可能性估计会变得更加极端。我们还发现,与两个数字预测相比,两个口头预测通常会导致更极端的综合可能性估计。不过,结果并不表明对建议独立性的敏感性取决于建议的形式。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Combining forecasts from advisors: The impact of advice independence and verbal versus numeric format.","authors":"Jeremy D Strueder, Paul D Windschitl","doi":"10.1037/xge0001611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Past research on advice-taking has suggested that people are often insensitive to the level of advice independence when combining forecasts from advisors. However, this has primarily been tested for cases in which people receive numeric forecasts. Recent work by Mislavsky and Gaertig (2022) shows that people sometimes employ different strategies when combining verbal versus numeric forecasts about the likelihood of future events. Specifically, likelihood judgments based on two verbal forecasts (e.g., \"rather likely\") are more often extreme (relative to the forecasts) than are likelihood judgments based on two numeric forecasts (e.g., \"70% probability\"). The goal of the present research was to investigate whether advice-takers' use of combination strategies can be sensitive to advice independence when differences in independence are highly salient and whether sensitivity to advice independence depends on the format in which advice is given. In two studies, we found that advice-takers became more extreme with their own likelihood estimate when combining forecasts from advisors who use separate evidence, as opposed to the same evidence. We also found that two verbal forecasts generally resulted in more extreme combined likelihood estimates than two numeric forecasts. However, the results did not suggest that sensitivity to advice independence depends on the format of advice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141889409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for When the Personal and the Collective Intersects: Memory, Future Thinking, and Perceived Agency During the COVID-19 Pandemic 当个人与集体交叉时》的补充材料:COVID-19 大流行期间的记忆、未来思考和感知机构
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001624.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for When the Personal and the Collective Intersects: Memory, Future Thinking, and Perceived Agency During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/xge0001624.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001624.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141825754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The contribution of auditory imagery and visual rhythm perception to sensorimotor synchronization with external and imagined rhythm. 听觉意象和视觉节奏感对感觉运动与外部和想象节奏同步的贡献。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001601
Simon Andrew Whitton, Benjamin Sreenan, Fang Jiang

Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) refers to the temporal coordination of an external stimulus with movement. Our previous work revealed that while SMS with visual flashing patterns was less consistent than with auditory or tactile patterns, it was still evident in a sample of nonmusicians. Although previous studies have speculated the potential role of auditory imagery, its contribution to visual SMS performance is not well quantified. Utilizing a synchronization-continuation finger-tapping task with a visual stimulus that included implied motion, we aimed to examine how participants' imagery ability, musicality, and rhythm perception affected SMS performance. We quantified participants' SMS consistency in synchronization (with visual cues) and continuation (without visual cues) phases. Participants also performed a perception task assessing their ability to detect temporal perturbations in the visual rhythm and completed musical ability and imagery questionnaires. Our linear regression model for SMS consistency included the trial phase, self-reported auditory imagery control and musicality, and visual rhythm perception as predictors. Significant effects of trial phase and auditory imagery scores on SMS consistency suggested that participants performed SMS more consistently while the guiding visual stimulus was present and that the higher one's self-reported auditory imagery ability, the better their SMS when continuing with unguided rhythm. One's visual rhythm perception accuracy significantly correlated with SMS consistency during the synchronization phase, and there was no correlation between rhythm perception and auditory imagery control. Overall, our results suggested relatively independent contributions of auditory imagery and visual rhythm perception to SMS with visual rhythm. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

感觉运动同步(SMS)是指外部刺激与运动在时间上的协调。我们之前的研究表明,虽然视觉闪烁模式的 SMS 一致性不如听觉或触觉模式,但在非音乐家样本中仍然很明显。虽然之前的研究推测了听觉意象的潜在作用,但其对视觉短信表现的贡献还没有很好地量化。我们使用了一个同步-持续手指敲击任务,其中的视觉刺激包括隐含的动作,目的是研究参与者的意象能力、音乐性和节奏感如何影响 SMS 表现。我们对参与者在同步(有视觉提示)和延续(无视觉提示)阶段的短信一致性进行了量化。参与者还完成了一项感知任务,以评估他们检测视觉节奏中时间扰动的能力,并填写了音乐能力和意象问卷。我们的 SMS 一致性线性回归模型将试验阶段、自我报告的听觉意象控制和音乐性以及视觉节奏感知作为预测因素。试验阶段和听觉意象得分对 SMS 一致性的显著影响表明,当有引导性视觉刺激时,受试者的 SMS 表现更稳定,而且自我报告的听觉意象能力越高,他们在继续无引导节奏时的 SMS 表现越好。在同步阶段,一个人的视觉节奏感知准确性与 SMS 的一致性显著相关,而节奏感知与听觉意象控制之间没有相关性。总之,我们的研究结果表明,听觉意象和视觉节奏感知对视觉节奏短信的贡献相对独立。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"The contribution of auditory imagery and visual rhythm perception to sensorimotor synchronization with external and imagined rhythm.","authors":"Simon Andrew Whitton, Benjamin Sreenan, Fang Jiang","doi":"10.1037/xge0001601","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) refers to the temporal coordination of an external stimulus with movement. Our previous work revealed that while SMS with visual flashing patterns was less consistent than with auditory or tactile patterns, it was still evident in a sample of nonmusicians. Although previous studies have speculated the potential role of auditory imagery, its contribution to visual SMS performance is not well quantified. Utilizing a synchronization-continuation finger-tapping task with a visual stimulus that included implied motion, we aimed to examine how participants' imagery ability, musicality, and rhythm perception affected SMS performance. We quantified participants' SMS consistency in synchronization (with visual cues) and continuation (without visual cues) phases. Participants also performed a perception task assessing their ability to detect temporal perturbations in the visual rhythm and completed musical ability and imagery questionnaires. Our linear regression model for SMS consistency included the trial phase, self-reported auditory imagery control and musicality, and visual rhythm perception as predictors. Significant effects of trial phase and auditory imagery scores on SMS consistency suggested that participants performed SMS more consistently while the guiding visual stimulus was present and that the higher one's self-reported auditory imagery ability, the better their SMS when continuing with unguided rhythm. One's visual rhythm perception accuracy significantly correlated with SMS consistency during the synchronization phase, and there was no correlation between rhythm perception and auditory imagery control. Overall, our results suggested relatively independent contributions of auditory imagery and visual rhythm perception to SMS with visual rhythm. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reading a graph is like reading a paragraph. 阅读图表就像阅读段落。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001604
Tal Boger, Steven Franconeri

Vision provides rapid processing for some tasks, but encounters strong constraints from others. Although many tasks encounter a capacity limit of processing four visual objects at once, some evidence suggests far lower limits for processing relationships among objects. What is our capacity limit for relational processing? If it is indeed limited, then people may miss important relationships between data values in a graph. To test this question, we asked people to explore graphs of trivially simple 2 × 2 data sets and found that half of the viewers missed surprising and improbable relationships (e.g., a child's height decreasing over time). These relationships were spotted easily in a control condition, which implicitly directed viewers to prioritize inspecting the key relationships. Thus, a severe limit on relational processing, combined with a cascade of other capacity-limited operations (e.g., linking values to semantic content), makes understanding a graph more like slowly reading a paragraph then immediately recognizing an image. These results also highlight the practical importance of "data storytelling" techniques, where communicators design graphs that help their audience prioritize the most important relationships in data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

视觉可为某些任务提供快速处理能力,但也会遇到其他任务的强大限制。虽然许多任务都会遇到同时处理四个视觉对象的能力限制,但一些证据表明,处理对象之间关系的能力限制要低得多。我们处理关系的能力极限是多少?如果确实有限,那么人们可能会错过图表中数据值之间的重要关系。为了测试这个问题,我们让人们探索非常简单的 2 × 2 数据集的图表,结果发现有一半的观察者错过了令人吃惊和不可能的关系(例如,一个孩子的身高随着时间的推移而降低)。而在对照条件下,这些关系很容易就被发现,因为对照条件隐含地引导观众优先检查关键关系。因此,对关系处理的严格限制,再加上一连串其他能力受限的操作(例如,将数值与语义内容联系起来),使得对图表的理解更像是慢慢阅读一段文字,而不是立即识别一幅图像。这些结果也凸显了 "数据讲故事 "技术的实际重要性,即传播者通过设计图表来帮助受众优先考虑数据中最重要的关系。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Reading a graph is like reading a paragraph.","authors":"Tal Boger, Steven Franconeri","doi":"10.1037/xge0001604","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vision provides rapid processing for some tasks, but encounters strong constraints from others. Although many tasks encounter a capacity limit of processing four visual objects at once, some evidence suggests far lower limits for processing relationships among objects. What is our capacity limit for relational processing? If it is indeed limited, then people may miss important relationships between data values in a graph. To test this question, we asked people to explore graphs of trivially simple 2 × 2 data sets and found that half of the viewers missed surprising and improbable relationships (e.g., a child's height decreasing over time). These relationships were spotted easily in a control condition, which implicitly directed viewers to prioritize inspecting the key relationships. Thus, a severe limit on relational processing, combined with a cascade of other capacity-limited operations (e.g., linking values to semantic content), makes understanding a graph more like slowly reading a paragraph then immediately recognizing an image. These results also highlight the practical importance of \"data storytelling\" techniques, where communicators design graphs that help their audience prioritize the most important relationships in data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Everyday amnesia: Residual memory for high confidence misses and implications for decision models of recognition. 日常健忘症:高置信度遗漏的残余记忆及其对识别决策模型的影响。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001599
Christopher J Berry, David R Shanks

Despite studying a list of items only minutes earlier, when reencountered in a recognition memory test, undergraduate participants often say with total confidence that they have not studied some of the items before. Such high confidence miss (HCM) responses have been taken as evidence of rapid and complete forgetting and of everyday amnesia (Roediger & Tekin, 2020). We investigated (a) if memory for HCMs is completely lost or whether a residual memory effect exists and (b) whether dominant decision models predict the effect. Participants studied faces (Experiments 1a, 2, and 3) or words (Experiment 1b), then completed a single-item recognition memory task, followed by either (a) a two-alternative forced-choice recognition task, in which the studied and nonstudied alternatives on each trial were matched for their previous old/new decision and confidence rating (Experiments 1 and 2) or (b) a second single-item recognition task in which the targets and foils were HCMs and high confidence correct rejections, respectively (Experiment 3). In each experiment, participants reliably distinguished HCMs from high-confidence correct rejections. The unequal variance signal detection and dual-process signal detection models were fit to the single-item recognition data, and the parameter estimates were used to predict the memory effect for HCMs. The dual-process signal detection model predicted the residual memory effect (as did another popular model, the mixture signal detection theory model). However, the unequal variance signal detection model incorrectly predicted a negative, or no, effect, invalidating this model. The residual memory effect for HCMs demonstrates that everyday amnesia is not associated with complete memory loss and distinguishes between decision models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管几分钟前才学习过一个项目列表,但当在识别记忆测试中再次遇到这些项目时,大学生参与者往往会非常自信地说,他们以前没有学习过其中的一些项目。这种高置信度遗漏(HCM)反应被认为是快速完全遗忘和日常遗忘的证据(Roediger 和 Tekin,2020 年)。我们研究了:(a) 对 HCM 的记忆是完全遗失还是存在残余记忆效应;(b) 主导决策模型是否能预测这种效应。参与者先学习面孔(实验 1a、2 和 3)或单词(实验 1b),然后完成单项识别记忆任务,接着完成(a)双项强迫选择识别任务,其中每个试验中的学习和非学习备选方案都与之前的新旧决策和置信度评级相匹配(实验 1 和 2),或者(b)第二个单项识别任务,其中目标和衬托物分别是高密度测量和高置信度正确拒绝(实验 3)。在每个实验中,被试都能可靠地将高置信度正确拒绝项与高置信度正确拒绝项区分开来。对单项识别数据拟合了不等方差信号检测模型和双过程信号检测模型,并利用参数估计来预测 HCM 的记忆效应。双过程信号检测模型预测了残余记忆效应(另一个流行模型--混合信号检测理论模型也预测了残余记忆效应)。然而,不等方差信号检测模型错误地预测了负效应或无效应,从而使该模型失效。HCMs 的残余记忆效应表明,日常健忘症与完全失忆无关,并能区分不同的决策模型。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Everyday amnesia: Residual memory for high confidence misses and implications for decision models of recognition.","authors":"Christopher J Berry, David R Shanks","doi":"10.1037/xge0001599","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite studying a list of items only minutes earlier, when reencountered in a recognition memory test, undergraduate participants often say with total confidence that they have not studied some of the items before. Such high confidence miss (HCM) responses have been taken as evidence of rapid and complete forgetting and of everyday amnesia (Roediger & Tekin, 2020). We investigated (a) if memory for HCMs is completely lost or whether a residual memory effect exists and (b) whether dominant decision models predict the effect. Participants studied faces (Experiments 1a, 2, and 3) or words (Experiment 1b), then completed a single-item recognition memory task, followed by either (a) a two-alternative forced-choice recognition task, in which the studied and nonstudied alternatives on each trial were matched for their previous old/new decision and confidence rating (Experiments 1 and 2) or (b) a second single-item recognition task in which the targets and foils were HCMs and high confidence correct rejections, respectively (Experiment 3). In each experiment, participants reliably distinguished HCMs from high-confidence correct rejections. The unequal variance signal detection and dual-process signal detection models were fit to the single-item recognition data, and the parameter estimates were used to predict the memory effect for HCMs. The dual-process signal detection model predicted the residual memory effect (as did another popular model, the mixture signal detection theory model). However, the unequal variance signal detection model incorrectly predicted a negative, or no, effect, invalidating this model. The residual memory effect for HCMs demonstrates that everyday amnesia is not associated with complete memory loss and distinguishes between decision models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140863222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ghosting: Social rejection without explanation, but not without care. 鬼混:社交拒绝:不做解释,但并非不关心。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001590
YeJin Park, Nadav Klein

Many social ties end when one side rejects the other, but rejection does not need to happen directly. Ghosting-the act of ending a relationship by ignoring another person's attempts to connect-is a common way of ending social ties. The present experiments first establish the key characteristics of ghosting and distinguish it from other rejection behaviors (Pilot Studies 1a-1c). The experiments then proceed to explore the relational and motivational implications of this behavior, finding that ghosters (those who ghost) care about the well-being of ghostees (those who are ghosted) more than ghostees realize. This result occurs in recalled instances of ghosting (Experiment 1), when ghosting in real time (Experiment 2), and when refraining from ghosting is monetarily costly (Experiment 3). We find that this occurs partly because ghostees underestimate the other-oriented motives involved in ghosting, misunderstanding that ghosters ghost partly as a way to end a tie while avoiding hurting ghostees' feelings (Experiments 4-6). Indeed, greater other-oriented motives lead to a higher likelihood of ghosting others (Experiment 7). A final experiment finds relational consequences whereby ghostees miss out on opportunities for future help exchange due to their underestimation of the extent to which ghosters care about them (Experiment 8). Ghosting is social rejection without explanation or feedback, but not without care. This study highlights how prosocial motives can drive rejection behaviors and the role of interpersonal accuracy in mitigating the negative effects of social rejection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

许多社会关系都是在一方拒绝另一方时结束的,但拒绝并不一定要直接发生。幽灵行为--通过无视他人的联系尝试来结束关系的行为--是结束社会关系的一种常见方式。本实验首先确定了幽灵行为的主要特征,并将其与其他拒绝行为区分开来(试验研究 1a-1c)。实验接着探讨了这种行为对关系和动机的影响,发现鬼魂(鬼魂的主人)比鬼魂的主人更关心鬼魂(被鬼魂的主人)的幸福。这一结果出现在回顾性鬼魂行为(实验 1)、实时鬼魂行为(实验 2)以及避免鬼魂行为需要付出金钱代价(实验 3)的情况下。我们发现,出现这种情况的部分原因是被鬼魂低估了鬼魂纠缠中的他者导向动机,误以为鬼魂纠缠者纠缠的部分原因是为了结束双方的关系,同时避免伤害被鬼魂的感情(实验4-6)。事实上,更强的他者导向动机会导致更高的鬼魂缠绕可能性(实验 7)。最后一个实验发现,由于受鬼者低估了鬼魂对他们的关心程度,他们错过了未来交换帮助的机会(实验8)。幽灵行为是没有解释或反馈的社会拒绝,但并非没有关心。这项研究强调了亲社会动机是如何驱动拒绝行为的,以及人际交往的准确性在减轻社交拒绝的负面影响方面所起的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Ghosting: Social rejection without explanation, but not without care.","authors":"YeJin Park, Nadav Klein","doi":"10.1037/xge0001590","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001590","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many social ties end when one side rejects the other, but rejection does not need to happen directly. Ghosting-the act of ending a relationship by ignoring another person's attempts to connect-is a common way of ending social ties. The present experiments first establish the key characteristics of ghosting and distinguish it from other rejection behaviors (Pilot Studies 1a-1c). The experiments then proceed to explore the relational and motivational implications of this behavior, finding that ghosters (those who ghost) care about the well-being of ghostees (those who are ghosted) more than ghostees realize. This result occurs in recalled instances of ghosting (Experiment 1), when ghosting in real time (Experiment 2), and when refraining from ghosting is monetarily costly (Experiment 3). We find that this occurs partly because ghostees underestimate the other-oriented motives involved in ghosting, misunderstanding that ghosters ghost partly as a way to end a tie while avoiding hurting ghostees' feelings (Experiments 4-6). Indeed, greater other-oriented motives lead to a higher likelihood of ghosting others (Experiment 7). A final experiment finds relational consequences whereby ghostees miss out on opportunities for future help exchange due to their underestimation of the extent to which ghosters care about them (Experiment 8). Ghosting is social rejection without explanation or feedback, but not without care. This study highlights how prosocial motives can drive rejection behaviors and the role of interpersonal accuracy in mitigating the negative effects of social rejection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motives matter more with age: Adult age differences in response to sociomoral violations. 年龄越大,动机越重要:成年人对违反社会道德行为反应的年龄差异。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001578
Alyssa R Minton, Jason S Snyder, Nathaniel A Young, Verena Graupmann, Joseph A Mikels

Moral judgments and emotional reactions to sociomoral violations are heavily impacted by a perpetrator's intentions and desires, which pose a threat to social harmony. Given that older adults are more motivated to maintain interpersonal harmony relative to younger adults, older adults may be more reactive to malicious desires. In three studies, we investigated adult age differences in moral judgments and emotional reactions to sociomoral violations. In all studies, participants read scenarios in which a perpetrator either (a) desired to harm another but nothing happened, or (b) harmed another accidentally without malicious desire. Study 2 incorporated additional scenarios designed to evoke anger and disgust without explicitly implicating another person to evaluate whether age differences emerge only when sociomoral violations against another are salient. In Study 3, we examined the combined effects of malicious desires and harmful outcomes by including scenarios in which (a) harmful desires were coupled with harmful outcomes, and (b) benign desires were coupled with benign outcomes. Predominantly across the studies, older adults judged perpetrators who desired to harm another more harshly but judged perpetrators who accidentally harmed another more leniently than younger adults. Emotional reactions generally corresponded with the differences in judgments. Taken together, this work suggests that desires more strongly impact older relative to younger adults' judgments and emotional reactions in sociomoral contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

道德判断和对违反社会道德行为的情绪反应在很大程度上受到犯罪者意图和欲望的影响,而犯罪者的意图和欲望对社会和谐构成威胁。与年轻人相比,老年人更愿意维护人际和谐,因此老年人对恶意欲望的反应可能会更强烈。在三项研究中,我们调查了成年人在道德判断和对违反社会道德行为的情绪反应方面的年龄差异。在所有研究中,参与者阅读的情景都是犯罪者(a)想要伤害他人但什么都没发生,或者(b)在没有恶意的情况下意外伤害了他人。研究 2 加入了额外的情景,旨在唤起愤怒和厌恶,但不明确涉及他人,以评估是否只有当社会道德侵犯他人时才会出现年龄差异。在研究 3 中,我们考察了恶意欲望和有害结果的综合影响,包括以下情景:(a) 有害欲望与有害结果相结合;(b) 善意欲望与善意结果相结合。在所有研究中,老年人对想要伤害他人的肇事者的判断主要比年轻人严厉,但对意外伤害他人的肇事者的判断则比年轻人宽松。情绪反应通常与判断的差异相对应。综上所述,这项研究表明,在社会道德情境中,欲望对老年人的判断和情绪反应的影响比对年轻人的影响更大。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Motives matter more with age: Adult age differences in response to sociomoral violations.","authors":"Alyssa R Minton, Jason S Snyder, Nathaniel A Young, Verena Graupmann, Joseph A Mikels","doi":"10.1037/xge0001578","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral judgments and emotional reactions to sociomoral violations are heavily impacted by a perpetrator's intentions and desires, which pose a threat to social harmony. Given that older adults are more motivated to maintain interpersonal harmony relative to younger adults, older adults may be more reactive to malicious desires. In three studies, we investigated adult age differences in moral judgments and emotional reactions to sociomoral violations. In all studies, participants read scenarios in which a perpetrator either (a) desired to harm another but nothing happened, or (b) harmed another accidentally without malicious desire. Study 2 incorporated additional scenarios designed to evoke anger and disgust without explicitly implicating another person to evaluate whether age differences emerge only when sociomoral violations against another are salient. In Study 3, we examined the combined effects of malicious desires and harmful outcomes by including scenarios in which (a) harmful desires were coupled with harmful outcomes, and (b) benign desires were coupled with benign outcomes. Predominantly across the studies, older adults judged perpetrators who desired to harm another more harshly but judged perpetrators who accidentally harmed another more leniently than younger adults. Emotional reactions generally corresponded with the differences in judgments. Taken together, this work suggests that desires more strongly impact older relative to younger adults' judgments and emotional reactions in sociomoral contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250574/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140859887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring variability in risk taking with large language models. 利用大型语言模型探索风险承担的可变性。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001607
Sudeep Bhatia

What are the sources of individual-level differences in risk taking, and how do they depend on the domain or situation in which the decision is being made? Psychologists currently answer such questions with psychometric methods, which analyze correlations across participant responses in survey data sets. In this article, we analyze the preferences that give rise to these correlations. Our approach uses (a) large language models (LLMs) to quantify everyday risky behaviors in terms of the attributes or reasons that may describe those behaviors, and (b) decision models to map these attributes and reasons onto participant responses. We show that LLM-based decision models can explain observed correlations between behaviors in terms of the reasons different behaviors elicit and explain observed correlations between individuals in terms of the weights different individuals place on reasons, thereby providing a decision theoretic foundation for psychometric findings. Since LLMs can generate quantitative representations for nearly any naturalistic decision, they can be used to make accurate out-of-sample predictions for hundreds of everyday behaviors, predict the reasons why people may or may not want to engage in these behaviors, and interpret these reasons in terms of core psychological constructs. Our approach has important theoretical and practical implications for the study of heterogeneity in everyday behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

风险承担的个体差异来源是什么,它们如何取决于做出决定的领域或情况?心理学家目前使用心理测量方法来回答这些问题,这种方法分析调查数据集中参与者回答之间的相关性。在本文中,我们将分析产生这些相关性的偏好。我们的方法使用:(a)大语言模型(LLM),根据可能描述这些行为的属性或原因量化日常风险行为;(b)决策模型,将这些属性和原因映射到参与者的回答中。我们的研究表明,基于 LLM 的决策模型可以根据不同行为引起的原因来解释观察到的行为之间的相关性,并根据不同个体对原因的重视程度来解释观察到的个体之间的相关性,从而为心理测量结果提供决策理论基础。由于 LLM 几乎可以为任何自然决策生成定量表征,因此它们可以用于对数百种日常行为进行精确的样本外预测,预测人们可能想要或可能不想要参与这些行为的原因,并根据核心心理结构解释这些原因。我们的方法对日常行为的异质性研究具有重要的理论和实践意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Exploring variability in risk taking with large language models.","authors":"Sudeep Bhatia","doi":"10.1037/xge0001607","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001607","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What are the sources of individual-level differences in risk taking, and how do they depend on the domain or situation in which the decision is being made? Psychologists currently answer such questions with psychometric methods, which analyze correlations across participant responses in survey data sets. In this article, we analyze the preferences that give rise to these correlations. Our approach uses (a) large language models (LLMs) to quantify everyday risky behaviors in terms of the attributes or reasons that may describe those behaviors, and (b) decision models to map these attributes and reasons onto participant responses. We show that LLM-based decision models can explain observed correlations between behaviors in terms of the reasons different behaviors elicit and explain observed correlations between individuals in terms of the weights different individuals place on reasons, thereby providing a decision theoretic foundation for psychometric findings. Since LLMs can generate quantitative representations for nearly any naturalistic decision, they can be used to make accurate out-of-sample predictions for hundreds of everyday behaviors, predict the reasons why people may or may not want to engage in these behaviors, and interpret these reasons in terms of core psychological constructs. Our approach has important theoretical and practical implications for the study of heterogeneity in everyday behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1