首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General最新文献

英文 中文
First impressions or good endings? Preferences depend on when you ask. 第一印象还是美好结局?喜好取决于你何时询问。
IF 4.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001638
Alyssa H Sinclair,Yuxi C Wang,R Alison Adcock
Rewards often unfold over time; we must summarize events in memory to guide future choices. Do first impressions matter most, or is it better to end on a good note? Across nine studies (N = 569), we tested these competing intuitions and found that preferences depend on when rewards occur and when we are asked to evaluate an experience. In our "garage sale" task, participants opened boxes containing sequences of objects with values. All boxes were equally valuable, but rewards were either evenly distributed or clustered at the beginning, middle, or end of the sequence. First, we tested preferences and valuation shortly after learning; we consistently found that boxes with rewards at the beginning were strongly preferred and overvalued. Object-value associative memory was impaired in boxes with early rewards, suggesting that value information was linked to the box rather than the objects. However, when tested after an overnight delay, participants equally preferred boxes with any cluster of rewards, whether at the beginning, middle, or end of the experience. Finally, we demonstrated that evaluating shortly after an experience led to lasting preferences for early rewards. Overall, we show that people summarize rewarding experiences in a nonlinear and time-dependent way, unifying prior work on affect, memory, and decision making. We propose that short-term preferences are biased by first impressions. However, when we wait and evaluate an experience after a delay, we summarize rewarding events in memory to inform adaptive longer term preferences. Preferences depend on when rewards occur and when we first evaluate an experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
回报往往会随着时间的推移而逐渐显现;我们必须在记忆中对事件进行总结,以指导未来的选择。是第一印象最重要,还是以好的结局结束更好?通过九项研究(N = 569),我们对这些相互竞争的直觉进行了测试,结果发现,偏好取决于奖励发生的时间和要求我们评估体验的时间。在我们的 "车库拍卖 "任务中,参与者打开了装有一系列有价值物品的盒子。所有的盒子都同样有价值,但奖励要么均匀分布,要么集中在序列的开头、中间或结尾。首先,我们测试了学习后不久的偏好和估价;我们一致发现,奖励位于开头的盒子会受到强烈偏好并被高估。在有早期奖励的盒子中,物体价值联想记忆受损,这表明价值信息是与盒子而不是物体联系在一起的。然而,在经过一夜的延迟测试后,参与者同样偏好任何一组奖励的盒子,无论是在体验的开始、中间还是结尾。最后,我们还证明,在体验结束后不久进行评估会导致人们对早期奖励的持久偏好。总之,我们的研究表明,人们是以非线性和时间依赖的方式总结奖励体验的,这与之前有关情感、记忆和决策的研究成果是一致的。我们提出,短期偏好会受到第一印象的影响。然而,当我们等待并在延迟后评估一次经历时,我们会总结记忆中的奖励事件,为适应性的长期偏好提供信息。偏好取决于奖励发生的时间和我们首次评估体验的时间。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"First impressions or good endings? Preferences depend on when you ask.","authors":"Alyssa H Sinclair,Yuxi C Wang,R Alison Adcock","doi":"10.1037/xge0001638","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001638","url":null,"abstract":"Rewards often unfold over time; we must summarize events in memory to guide future choices. Do first impressions matter most, or is it better to end on a good note? Across nine studies (N = 569), we tested these competing intuitions and found that preferences depend on when rewards occur and when we are asked to evaluate an experience. In our \"garage sale\" task, participants opened boxes containing sequences of objects with values. All boxes were equally valuable, but rewards were either evenly distributed or clustered at the beginning, middle, or end of the sequence. First, we tested preferences and valuation shortly after learning; we consistently found that boxes with rewards at the beginning were strongly preferred and overvalued. Object-value associative memory was impaired in boxes with early rewards, suggesting that value information was linked to the box rather than the objects. However, when tested after an overnight delay, participants equally preferred boxes with any cluster of rewards, whether at the beginning, middle, or end of the experience. Finally, we demonstrated that evaluating shortly after an experience led to lasting preferences for early rewards. Overall, we show that people summarize rewarding experiences in a nonlinear and time-dependent way, unifying prior work on affect, memory, and decision making. We propose that short-term preferences are biased by first impressions. However, when we wait and evaluate an experience after a delay, we summarize rewarding events in memory to inform adaptive longer term preferences. Preferences depend on when rewards occur and when we first evaluate an experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Numerical comparison is spatial-Except when it is not. 数值比较是空间性的--除非它不是。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001644
Fraulein Retanal, Véronic Delage, Evan F Risko, Erin A Maloney

The numerical distance effect (NDE) is an important tool for probing the nature of numerical representation. Across two studies, we assessed the degree to which the NDE relates to one's performance on spatial tasks to investigate the role of spatial processing in numerical comparison and, by extension, numerical cognition. We administered numerical comparison tasks and a variety of tasks thought to tap into different aspects of spatial processing. Importantly, we administered both the simultaneous comparison task and the comparison to a standard task, given claims that the NDEs that arise in these two tasks are different. In both studies, the NDEs elicited when comparing simultaneously presented numbers were more strongly negatively correlated with an individual's performance on the spatial tasks than the NDEs elicited when comparing numbers to a standard. The implications of these data for our understanding of numerical comparison tasks and numerical cognition more generally are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

数字距离效应(NDE)是探究数字表征本质的重要工具。在两项研究中,我们评估了 NDE 与一个人在空间任务中的表现的相关程度,以研究空间处理在数字比较中的作用,并进而研究数字认知。我们进行了数字比较任务和各种被认为能够挖掘空间处理不同方面的任务。重要的是,我们同时进行了同步比较任务和与标准任务的比较,因为这两项任务中出现的无意识状态是不同的。在这两项研究中,比较同时呈现的数字时所引发的无意识状态与个体在空间任务中的表现相比,负相关程度更强,而比较数字与标准时所引发的无意识状态与个体在空间任务中的表现相比,负相关程度更弱。本文讨论了这些数据对我们理解数字比较任务和一般数字认知的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Numerical comparison is spatial-Except when it is not.","authors":"Fraulein Retanal, Véronic Delage, Evan F Risko, Erin A Maloney","doi":"10.1037/xge0001644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The numerical distance effect (NDE) is an important tool for probing the nature of numerical representation. Across two studies, we assessed the degree to which the NDE relates to one's performance on spatial tasks to investigate the role of spatial processing in numerical comparison and, by extension, numerical cognition. We administered numerical comparison tasks and a variety of tasks thought to tap into different aspects of spatial processing. Importantly, we administered both the simultaneous comparison task and the comparison to a standard task, given claims that the NDEs that arise in these two tasks are different. In both studies, the NDEs elicited when comparing simultaneously presented numbers were more strongly negatively correlated with an individual's performance on the spatial tasks than the NDEs elicited when comparing numbers to a standard. The implications of these data for our understanding of numerical comparison tasks and numerical cognition more generally are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Girls persist more but divest less from ineffective teaching than boys. 与男生相比,女生坚持的时间更长,但从无效教学中撤出的资金更少。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001646
Mia Radovanovic, Ece Yucer, Jessica A Sommerville

Teaching is the primary way children learn about the world. However, successful learning involves recognizing when teaching is ineffective, even in the absence of overt cues, and divesting from ineffective teaching to explore novel solutions. Across three experiments, we investigated 7- to 10-year-old children's ability to recognize ineffective teaching; we tested the hypothesis that girls may be less likely than boys to divest by exploring new solutions, given documented gender differences in socialization toward conformity and obedience. Overall, we demonstrate that children independently tested taught solutions and, upon learning that the solutions were ineffective, rationally traded off between instruction and exploration. Simultaneously, gender differences in divestment emerged. On average, girls demonstrated greater persistence in applying the taught solution, while boys tended to explore their own ideas, leading to differences in solving and learning. Importantly, these differences were observable across both masculine- and feminine-stereotyped tasks. These results have important implications for children's learning and the development of leadership. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

教学是儿童了解世界的主要方式。然而,成功的学习需要识别教学何时无效,即使在没有明显提示的情况下,并从无效教学中剥离出来,探索新的解决方案。在三个实验中,我们调查了 7 至 10 岁儿童识别无效教学的能力;我们测试了一个假设,即考虑到性别在社会化过程中趋于一致和服从的差异,女孩可能比男孩更不可能通过探索新的解决方案来摆脱无效教学。总之,我们证明,儿童会独立测试所教的解决方案,并在得知解决方案无效时,理性地在教学和探索之间进行权衡。与此同时,在撤资方面也出现了性别差异。平均而言,女孩更坚持应用所教的解决方案,而男孩则倾向于探索自己的想法,这导致了解决问题和学习方面的差异。重要的是,这些差异在男性和女性定型任务中都能观察到。这些结果对儿童的学习和领导力的发展具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Girls persist more but divest less from ineffective teaching than boys.","authors":"Mia Radovanovic, Ece Yucer, Jessica A Sommerville","doi":"10.1037/xge0001646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teaching is the primary way children learn about the world. However, successful learning involves recognizing when teaching is ineffective, even in the absence of overt cues, and divesting from ineffective teaching to explore novel solutions. Across three experiments, we investigated 7- to 10-year-old children's ability to recognize ineffective teaching; we tested the hypothesis that girls may be less likely than boys to divest by exploring new solutions, given documented gender differences in socialization toward conformity and obedience. Overall, we demonstrate that children independently tested taught solutions and, upon learning that the solutions were ineffective, rationally traded off between instruction and exploration. Simultaneously, gender differences in divestment emerged. On average, girls demonstrated greater persistence in applying the taught solution, while boys tended to explore their own ideas, leading to differences in solving and learning. Importantly, these differences were observable across both masculine- and feminine-stereotyped tasks. These results have important implications for children's learning and the development of leadership. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Older yet sharp: No general age-related decline in focusing attention. 年长却敏锐:集中注意力的能力不会因年龄增长而普遍下降。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001649
Alessandra S Souza, Gidon T Frischkorn, Klaus Oberauer

Attention is a multifaceted mechanism operating on space, features, and memory. Previous studies reported both decline and preservation of attention in aging. Yet, it is unclear if healthy aging differentially affects attentional selection in these domains. To address these inconsistencies, we evaluated the ability to focus attention using a battery of 11 tasks in a large sample of younger and older adults (n = 172/174). We addressed whether (a) individual differences and aging effects are consistent across different attention tasks and (b) there is a domain-specific or domain-general age-related decline in focused attention. Both younger and older adults benefited from focusing attention on space, features, and memory representations. Confirmatory factor analysis showed substantial commonalities in baseline performance across all tasks, indicating shared variance in decision-making and memory processes. Focused-attention effects, however, formed separate factors reflecting spatial-, feature-, and memory-based attentional efficiency. Correlations between these factors were generally low and inconsistent for both age groups. This supports the view that focused attention is not a single ability. Within the same domain, some tasks showed a decline, whereas others showed improvement with aging, and, on average, attentional benefits were similar across age groups. Accordingly, our results are inconsistent with the claim that aging is associated with either domain-specific or domain-general decline in focused attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

注意力是一种对空间、特征和记忆起作用的多方面机制。以往的研究表明,衰老过程中注意力既有下降,也有保持。然而,目前还不清楚健康老龄化是否会对这些领域的注意力选择产生不同影响。为了解决这些不一致的问题,我们在一个大样本的年轻人和老年人(n = 172/174)中使用 11 项任务评估了集中注意力的能力。我们探讨了:(a) 在不同的注意力任务中,个体差异和衰老效应是否一致;(b) 与特定领域或一般领域相关的注意力集中能力衰退。年轻人和老年人都能从将注意力集中在空间、特征和记忆表征上获益。确认性因素分析表明,所有任务的基线成绩都有很大的共性,这表明决策和记忆过程存在共同的差异。然而,集中注意力的效果形成了反映空间、特征和记忆注意力效率的独立因素。在两个年龄组中,这些因素之间的相关性普遍较低且不一致。这支持了集中注意不是一种单一能力的观点。在同一领域中,一些任务随着年龄的增长而下降,而另一些任务则随着年龄的增长而提高。因此,我们的研究结果与衰老与特定领域或一般领域的集中注意力下降有关的说法不一致。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Older yet sharp: No general age-related decline in focusing attention.","authors":"Alessandra S Souza, Gidon T Frischkorn, Klaus Oberauer","doi":"10.1037/xge0001649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention is a multifaceted mechanism operating on space, features, and memory. Previous studies reported both decline and preservation of attention in aging. Yet, it is unclear if healthy aging differentially affects attentional selection in these domains. To address these inconsistencies, we evaluated the ability to focus attention using a battery of 11 tasks in a large sample of younger and older adults (<i>n</i> = 172/174). We addressed whether (a) individual differences and aging effects are consistent across different attention tasks and (b) there is a domain-specific or domain-general age-related decline in focused attention. Both younger and older adults benefited from focusing attention on space, features, and memory representations. Confirmatory factor analysis showed substantial commonalities in baseline performance across all tasks, indicating shared variance in decision-making and memory processes. Focused-attention effects, however, formed separate factors reflecting spatial-, feature-, and memory-based attentional efficiency. Correlations between these factors were generally low and inconsistent for both age groups. This supports the view that focused attention is not a single ability. Within the same domain, some tasks showed a decline, whereas others showed improvement with aging, and, on average, attentional benefits were similar across age groups. Accordingly, our results are inconsistent with the claim that aging is associated with either domain-specific or domain-general decline in focused attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The haves and have-nots: Infants use wealth to guide social behavior and evaluation. 富人和穷人:婴儿用财富指导社会行为和评价。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001567
Arianne E Eason, Elizabeth A Enright, Shimeng Weng, Rachel O Horton, Miranda J Sitch, Jessica A Sommerville

Biases favoring the wealthy are ubiquitous, and they support and bolster vast resource inequalities across individuals and groups; yet, when these biases are acquired remains unknown. In Experiments 1 through 5 (Total N = 232), using multiple methods, we found that 14- to 18-month-old infants track individuals' wealth (Experiments 1-5), prefer and selectively help rich (vs. poor) individuals (Experiments 2 and 3), and negatively evaluate poor individuals (Experiments 4 and 5). In two subsequent experiments with 11- to 13-month-old infants (Total N = 65), however, we find no evidence of preferences for rich (vs. poor) individuals (Experiment 6) or differential evaluations of rich and poor people (Experiment 7). Together, these results demonstrate that in the second year of life, wealth emerges as a central and robust dimension of evaluation that guides social decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

偏向富人的偏见无处不在,这些偏见支持并加剧了个人和群体之间巨大的资源不平等;然而,这些偏见是何时获得的仍然不得而知。在实验 1 到 5(总人数 = 232)中,我们使用多种方法发现,14 到 18 个月大的婴儿会追踪个体的财富(实验 1-5),偏好并选择性地帮助富人(相对于穷人)(实验 2 和 3),并对穷人做出负面评价(实验 4 和 5)。然而,在随后两个以 11 至 13 个月大的婴儿为对象的实验中(总人数 = 65),我们没有发现婴儿对富人(与穷人)有偏好(实验 6)或对富人和穷人有不同评价(实验 7)的证据。总之,这些结果表明,在婴儿出生后的第二年,财富已成为指导社会决策的一个重要而稳健的评价维度。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"The haves and have-nots: Infants use wealth to guide social behavior and evaluation.","authors":"Arianne E Eason, Elizabeth A Enright, Shimeng Weng, Rachel O Horton, Miranda J Sitch, Jessica A Sommerville","doi":"10.1037/xge0001567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001567","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biases favoring the wealthy are ubiquitous, and they support and bolster vast resource inequalities across individuals and groups; yet, when these biases are acquired remains unknown. In Experiments 1 through 5 (Total <i>N</i> = 232), using multiple methods, we found that 14- to 18-month-old infants track individuals' wealth (Experiments 1-5), prefer and selectively help rich (vs. poor) individuals (Experiments 2 and 3), and negatively evaluate poor individuals (Experiments 4 and 5). In two subsequent experiments with 11- to 13-month-old infants (Total <i>N</i> = 65), however, we find no evidence of preferences for rich (vs. poor) individuals (Experiment 6) or differential evaluations of rich and poor people (Experiment 7). Together, these results demonstrate that in the second year of life, wealth emerges as a central and robust dimension of evaluation that guides social decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-cultural conceptions of third-party intervention across childhood. 儿童时期第三方干预的跨文化概念。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001617
Julia Marshall, Kellen Mermin-Bunnell, Anton Gollwitzer, Jan Retelsdorf, Paul Bloom

Third-party intervention is a cornerstone of cooperative societies, yet we know little about how children develop an understanding of this social behavior. The present work generates a cross-cultural and developmental picture of how 6-, 9-, and 12-year-olds (N = 447) across four societies (India, Germany, Uganda, and the United States) reason about third-party intervention. To do so, we measured children's obligation judgments and unstructured descriptions of third-party intervention. Although some cultural differences emerged, 6-year-olds largely considered bystanders as obligated to respond to wrongdoing, regardless of the bystander's social position. In contrast, 9- and 12-year-olds were more likely to exclusively ascribe this social responsibility to people in positions of authority. Despite these age differences, children of all ages generated role-specific descriptions of third-party intervention, with authority figures intervening in distinct ways from peers. For authority figures, children in India and Uganda described third-party intervention as involving corporal punishment or unspecified punishment, whereas children in the United States described such intervention as involving only verbal intervention (i.e., telling someone to stop). For peers, children in all societies described third-party intervention as involving reporting misdeeds to an authority. Collectively, these data show that early conceptualizations of third-party intervention are rooted in shared notions of obligation yet are also subject to cultural and contextual influences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

第三方干预是合作社会的基石,但我们对儿童如何理解这种社会行为却知之甚少。本研究对四个社会(印度、德国、乌干达和美国)的 6 岁、9 岁和 12 岁儿童(人数 = 447)如何推理第三方干预进行了跨文化和发展性研究。为此,我们测量了儿童对第三方干预的义务判断和非结构化描述。尽管出现了一些文化差异,但 6 岁儿童大多认为旁观者有义务对不法行为做出反应,无论旁观者的社会地位如何。相比之下,9 岁和 12 岁的儿童更倾向于把这种社会责任完全归咎于有权势的人。尽管存在这些年龄差异,但各年龄段的儿童对第三方干预的描述都有其特定的角色,权威人物与同龄人的干预方式截然不同。对于权威人物,印度和乌干达儿童描述的第三方干预包括体罚或不明处罚,而美国儿童描述的第三方干预只包括口头干预(即告诉某人停止)。对于同龄人,所有社会的儿童都把第三方干预描述为向权威报告不法行为。总之,这些数据表明,第三方干预的早期概念根植于共同的义务观念,但也受到文化和环境的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Cross-cultural conceptions of third-party intervention across childhood.","authors":"Julia Marshall, Kellen Mermin-Bunnell, Anton Gollwitzer, Jan Retelsdorf, Paul Bloom","doi":"10.1037/xge0001617","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Third-party intervention is a cornerstone of cooperative societies, yet we know little about how children develop an understanding of this social behavior. The present work generates a cross-cultural and developmental picture of how 6-, 9-, and 12-year-olds (<i>N</i> = 447) across four societies (India, Germany, Uganda, and the United States) reason about third-party intervention. To do so, we measured children's obligation judgments and unstructured descriptions of third-party intervention. Although some cultural differences emerged, 6-year-olds largely considered bystanders as obligated to respond to wrongdoing, regardless of the bystander's social position. In contrast, 9- and 12-year-olds were more likely to exclusively ascribe this social responsibility to people in positions of authority. Despite these age differences, children of all ages generated role-specific descriptions of third-party intervention, with authority figures intervening in distinct ways from peers. For authority figures, children in India and Uganda described third-party intervention as involving corporal punishment or unspecified punishment, whereas children in the United States described such intervention as involving only verbal intervention (i.e., telling someone to stop). For peers, children in all societies described third-party intervention as involving reporting misdeeds to an authority. Collectively, these data show that early conceptualizations of third-party intervention are rooted in shared notions of obligation yet are also subject to cultural and contextual influences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning from failure: The roles of self-focused feedback, task expectations, and subsequent instruction. 从失败中学习:自我反馈、任务期望和后续指导的作用。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001632
Sebahat Gok, Emily R Fyfe

Previous research indicates that failure feedback leads people to tune out from the task, which is detrimental to their learning (Eskreis-Winkler & Fishbach, 2019; Keith et al., 2022). The current work aims to identify ways to optimize learning from failure feedback. We conducted six preregistered experiments (N = 1,306) to replicate and extend the findings from Eskreis-Winkler and Fishbach (2019) with novel tests of self-focused feedback, task expectations, and subsequent instruction. The detriments of failure feedback were replicated in Studies 1a, 1b, and 1c, which altered the focus of the feedback message to be self-focused (e.g., your answer) or task-focused (e.g., the answer). The detriments of failure feedback were also replicated in Study 2 when the task expectations were manipulated to easy versus hard. These results generally underscored the robustness of the results from the original study. However, Study 3 established boundary conditions. When it was a rule-based task and brief instructions on the rule were provided after feedback, there was no evidence of a detrimental effect of failure, and failure feedback, in some conditions, resulted in even better learning than success feedback for learning new material. We conclude that the tune-out reactions to failure during feedback disappear and may even be reversed when subsequent learning opportunities are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

以往的研究表明,失败反馈会导致人们放弃任务,这不利于他们的学习(Eskreis-Winkler & Fishbach, 2019; Keith et al.)目前的工作旨在找出优化从失败反馈中学习的方法。我们进行了六项预先登记的实验(N = 1,306),通过对自我反馈、任务预期和后续指导的新测试,复制并扩展了 Eskreis-Winkler 和 Fishbach(2019)的研究结果。失败反馈的危害在研究1a、1b和1c中得到了复制,这些研究改变了反馈信息的重点,使之成为以自我为中心(如你的答案)或以任务为中心(如答案)。在研究 2 中,当任务预期被操纵为易与难时,失败反馈的不利影响也得到了复制。这些结果总体上强调了原始研究结果的稳健性。不过,研究 3 确定了边界条件。当这是一项基于规则的任务,并且在反馈后提供了关于规则的简短说明时,没有证据表明失败会产生有害影响,而且在某些条件下,失败反馈甚至比成功反馈更有利于学习新材料。我们的结论是,在反馈过程中对失败的调整反应会消失,甚至在提供后续学习机会时会逆转。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Learning from failure: The roles of self-focused feedback, task expectations, and subsequent instruction.","authors":"Sebahat Gok, Emily R Fyfe","doi":"10.1037/xge0001632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001632","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research indicates that failure feedback leads people to <i>tune out</i> from the task, which is detrimental to their learning (Eskreis-Winkler & Fishbach, 2019; Keith et al., 2022). The current work aims to identify ways to optimize learning from failure feedback. We conducted six preregistered experiments (<i>N</i> = 1,306) to replicate and extend the findings from Eskreis-Winkler and Fishbach (2019) with novel tests of self-focused feedback, task expectations, and subsequent instruction. The detriments of failure feedback were replicated in Studies 1a, 1b, and 1c, which altered the focus of the feedback message to be self-focused (e.g., your answer) or task-focused (e.g., the answer). The detriments of failure feedback were also replicated in Study 2 when the task expectations were manipulated to easy versus hard. These results generally underscored the robustness of the results from the original study. However, Study 3 established boundary conditions. When it was a rule-based task and brief instructions on the rule were provided after feedback, there was no evidence of a detrimental effect of failure, and failure feedback, in some conditions, resulted in even better learning than success feedback for learning new material. We conclude that the <i>tune-out</i> reactions to failure during feedback disappear and may even be reversed when subsequent learning opportunities are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spontaneous path tracing in task-irrelevant mazes: Spatial affordances trigger dynamic visual routines. 在与任务无关的迷宫中自发追踪路径:空间负担能力触发动态视觉程序
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001618
Kimberly W Wong, Brian J Scholl

Given a maze (e.g., in a book of puzzles), you might solve it by drawing out paths with your pencil. But even without a pencil, you might naturally find yourself mentally tracing along various paths. This "mental path tracing" may intuitively seem to depend on your (overt, conscious, voluntary) goal of wanting to get out of the maze, but might it also occur spontaneously-as a result of simply seeing the maze, via a kind of dynamic visual routine? Here, observers simply had to compare the visual properties of two probes presented in a maze. The maze itself was entirely task irrelevant, but we predicted that simply seeing the maze's visual structure would "afford" incidental mental path tracing (à la Gibson). Across four experiments, observers were slower to compare probes that were further from each other along the paths, even when controlling for lower level properties (such as the probes' brute linear separation, ignoring the maze "walls"). These results also generalized beyond mazes to other unfamiliar displays with task-irrelevant circular obstacles. This novel combination of two prominent themes from our field-affordances and visual routines-suggests that at least some visual routines may not require voluntary goals; instead, they may operate in an automatic (incidental, stimulus-driven) fashion, as a part of visual processing itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

如果给你一个迷宫(例如谜题书中的迷宫),你可能会用铅笔画出路径来解决它。但即使没有铅笔,你也会自然而然地发现自己在心理上沿着各种路径进行追踪。这种 "心理路径追踪 "直觉上似乎取决于你(公开的、有意识的、自愿的)想要走出迷宫的目标,但它是否也会自发地发生--通过一种动态的视觉程序,仅仅是看到迷宫的结果?在这里,观察者只需比较迷宫中出现的两个探针的视觉特性。迷宫本身与任务完全无关,但我们预测,只要看到迷宫的视觉结构,就能 "提供 "附带的心理路径追踪(类似于吉布森)。在四次实验中,即使控制了较低层次的属性(如探针的粗暴线性分离,忽略迷宫 "墙壁"),观察者在比较路径上彼此相距较远的探针时也较慢。这些结果还超越了迷宫的范围,扩展到其他与任务无关的圆形障碍物的陌生显示。这种将本领域两个突出主题--"负担 "和 "视觉例行程序"--结合起来的新方法表明,至少某些视觉例行程序可能不需要自愿目标;相反,它们可能以自动(偶然、刺激驱动)的方式运行,成为视觉处理本身的一部分。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Spontaneous path tracing in task-irrelevant mazes: Spatial affordances trigger dynamic visual routines.","authors":"Kimberly W Wong, Brian J Scholl","doi":"10.1037/xge0001618","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001618","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given a maze (e.g., in a book of puzzles), you might solve it by drawing out paths with your pencil. But even without a pencil, you might naturally find yourself <i>mentally</i> tracing along various paths. This \"mental path tracing\" may intuitively seem to depend on your (overt, conscious, voluntary) goal of wanting to get out of the maze, but might it also occur spontaneously-as a result of simply <i>seeing</i> the maze, via a kind of dynamic visual routine? Here, observers simply had to compare the visual properties of two probes presented in a maze. The maze itself was entirely task irrelevant, but we predicted that simply <i>seeing</i> the maze's visual structure would \"afford\" incidental mental path tracing (à la Gibson). Across four experiments, observers were slower to compare probes that were further from each other along the paths, even when controlling for lower level properties (such as the probes' brute linear separation, ignoring the maze \"walls\"). These results also generalized beyond mazes to other unfamiliar displays with task-irrelevant circular obstacles. This novel combination of two prominent themes from our field-affordances and visual routines-suggests that at least some visual routines may not require voluntary goals; instead, they may operate in an automatic (incidental, stimulus-driven) fashion, as a part of visual processing itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141633603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Theta-band neural oscillations reflect cognitive control during language processing. θ波段神经振荡反映了语言处理过程中的认知控制。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001621
Tal Ness, Valerie J Langlois, Jared M Novick, Albert E Kim

As we interpret language moment by moment, we often encounter conflicting cues in the input that create incompatible representations of sentence meaning, which must be promptly resolved. Although ample evidence suggests that cognitive control aids in the resolution of such conflict, the methods commonly used to assess cognitive control's involvement in language comprehension provide limited information about the time course of its engagement. Here, we show that neural oscillatory activity in the theta-band (∼3-8 Hz), which is associated with cognitive control in nonlinguistic tasks like Stroop and Flanker, provides a real-time index of cognitive control during language processing. We conducted time-frequency analyses of four electroencephalogram data sets, and consistently observed that increased theta-band power was elicited by various kinds of linguistic conflict. Moreover, increases in the degree of conflict within a sentence produced greater increases in theta activity. These effects emerged as early as 300 ms from the onset of the initiating event, indicating rapid cognitive-control recruitment during sentence processing in response to conflicting representations. Crucially, the effect patterns could not be ascribed to processing difficulty that is not due to conflict (e.g., semantic implausibility was neither necessary nor sufficient to elicit theta activity). We suggest that neural oscillations in the theta-band offer a reliable way to test specific hypotheses about cognitive-control engagement during real-time language comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

当我们一刻不停地解释语言时,我们经常会在输入中遇到相互冲突的线索,这些线索会产生不相容的句子意义表征,我们必须及时解决这些问题。尽管有大量证据表明认知控制有助于解决这种冲突,但常用于评估认知控制参与语言理解的方法只能提供有关其参与时间过程的有限信息。在这里,我们展示了在 Stroop 和 Flanker 等非语言任务中与认知控制相关的 θ 波段(3~8 Hz)神经振荡活动,它提供了语言处理过程中认知控制的实时指标。我们对四组脑电图数据进行了时频分析,一致观察到各种语言冲突都会引起θ波段功率的增加。此外,句子中冲突程度的增加也会导致θ活动的增加。这些效应最早出现在启动事件开始后的 300 毫秒内,表明在句子处理过程中,认知控制的快速招募对冲突表征做出了反应。重要的是,这些效应模式不能归因于非冲突导致的处理困难(例如,语义不可信既不是引起θ活动的必要条件,也不是充分条件)。我们认为,θ波段的神经振荡为测试实时语言理解过程中认知控制参与的特定假设提供了一种可靠的方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Theta-band neural oscillations reflect cognitive control during language processing.","authors":"Tal Ness, Valerie J Langlois, Jared M Novick, Albert E Kim","doi":"10.1037/xge0001621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As we interpret language moment by moment, we often encounter conflicting cues in the input that create incompatible representations of sentence meaning, which must be promptly resolved. Although ample evidence suggests that cognitive control aids in the resolution of such conflict, the methods commonly used to assess cognitive control's involvement in language comprehension provide limited information about the time course of its engagement. Here, we show that neural oscillatory activity in the theta-band (∼3-8 Hz), which is associated with cognitive control in nonlinguistic tasks like Stroop and Flanker, provides a real-time index of cognitive control during language processing. We conducted time-frequency analyses of four electroencephalogram data sets, and consistently observed that increased theta-band power was elicited by various kinds of linguistic conflict. Moreover, increases in the degree of conflict within a sentence produced greater increases in theta activity. These effects emerged as early as 300 ms from the onset of the initiating event, indicating rapid cognitive-control recruitment during sentence processing in response to conflicting representations. Crucially, the effect patterns could not be ascribed to processing difficulty that is not due to conflict (e.g., semantic implausibility was neither necessary nor sufficient to elicit theta activity). We suggest that neural oscillations in the theta-band offer a reliable way to test specific hypotheses about cognitive-control engagement during real-time language comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What makes working memory work? A multifaceted account of the predictive power of working memory capacity. 是什么让工作记忆发挥作用?对工作记忆能力预测能力的多方面阐述。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001629
Matthew K Robison, Ashley L Miller, Elizabeth A Wiemers, Derek M Ellis, Nash Unsworth, Thomas S Redick, Gene A Brewer

Working memory capacity (WMC) has received a great deal of attention in cognitive psychology partly because WMC correlates broadly with other abilities (e.g., reading comprehension, second-language proficiency, fluid intelligence) and thus seems to be a critical aspect of cognitive ability. However, it is still rigorously debated why such correlations occur. Some theories posit a single ability (e.g., attention control, short-term memory capacity, controlled memory search) as the primary reason behind WMC's predictiveness, whereas others argue that WMC is predictive because it taps into multiple abilities. Here, we tested these single- and multifaceted accounts of WMC with a large-scale (N = 974) individual-differences investigation of WMC and three hypothesized mediators: attention control, primary memory, and secondary memory. We found evidence for a multifaceted account, such that no single ability could fully mediate the relation between WMC and higher order cognition (i.e., reading comprehension and fluid intelligence). Further, such an effect held regardless of whether WMC was measured via complex span or n-back. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

工作记忆能力(WMC)在认知心理学中备受关注,部分原因是工作记忆能力与其他能力(如阅读理解能力、第二语言能力、流体智力)有广泛的相关性,因此似乎是认知能力的一个重要方面。然而,为什么会出现这种相关性,目前仍存在着激烈的争论。一些理论认为,单一能力(如注意力控制、短时记忆能力、可控记忆搜索)是 WMC 预测性背后的主要原因,而另一些理论则认为,WMC 具有预测性是因为它挖掘了多种能力。在此,我们通过一项大规模(N = 974)的个体差异调查,检验了WMC的单一和多元说法,以及三个假设的中介因素:注意力控制、主要记忆和次要记忆。我们发现了多层面解释的证据,即没有任何一种能力可以完全调解 WMC 与高阶认知(即阅读理解能力和流体智力)之间的关系。此外,无论WMC是通过复合跨度还是n-back来测量,这种效应都是成立的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"What makes working memory work? A multifaceted account of the predictive power of working memory capacity.","authors":"Matthew K Robison, Ashley L Miller, Elizabeth A Wiemers, Derek M Ellis, Nash Unsworth, Thomas S Redick, Gene A Brewer","doi":"10.1037/xge0001629","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001629","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory capacity (WMC) has received a great deal of attention in cognitive psychology partly because WMC correlates broadly with other abilities (e.g., reading comprehension, second-language proficiency, fluid intelligence) and thus seems to be a critical aspect of cognitive ability. However, it is still rigorously debated <i>why</i> such correlations occur. Some theories posit a single ability (e.g., attention control, short-term memory capacity, controlled memory search) as the primary reason behind WMC's predictiveness, whereas others argue that WMC is predictive because it taps into multiple abilities. Here, we tested these single- and multifaceted accounts of WMC with a large-scale (<i>N</i> = 974) individual-differences investigation of WMC and three hypothesized mediators: attention control, primary memory, and secondary memory. We found evidence for a multifaceted account, such that no single ability could fully mediate the relation between WMC and higher order cognition (i.e., reading comprehension and fluid intelligence). Further, such an effect held regardless of whether WMC was measured via complex span or n-back. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1