首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General最新文献

英文 中文
The exaggerated benefits of failure. 夸大失败的好处。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001610
Lauren Eskreis-Winkler, Kaitlin Woolley, Eda Erensoy, Minhee Kim

Commencement speakers, business leaders, and the popular press tell us that failure has at least one benefit: It fuels success. Does it? Across 11 studies, including a field study of medical professionals, predictors overestimated the rate at which people course correct following failure (Studies 1-4). Predictors overestimated the likelihood that professionals who fail a professional exam (e.g., the bar exam, the medical boards) pass a retest (Studies 1a, 1b, and 2a), the likelihood that patients improve their health after a crisis (e.g., heart attack, drug overdose; Studies 2b and 6), and the probability, more generally, of learning from one's mistakes (Studies 3-5). This effect was specific to overestimating success following failure (Study 4) and erasing mention of an initial failure that had actually occurred corrected the problem (Studies 2a and 2b). The success overestimate was due, at least in part, to the belief that people attend to failure more than they do (Studies 5 and 6). Correcting this overestimate had policy implications. Citizens apprised of the sobering true rate of postfailure success increased their support for rehabilitative initiatives aimed at helping struggling populations (e.g., people with addiction, ex-convicts) learn from past mistakes (Studies 7a-7c). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

毕业典礼上的演讲者、商界领袖和大众媒体都告诉我们,失败至少有一个好处:它能促进成功。是这样吗?在 11 项研究(包括一项对医学专业人员的实地研究)中,预测者高估了人们在失败后的正确率(研究 1-4)。预测者高估了专业考试(如律师资格考试、医学委员会考试)失败的专业人员通过复试的可能性(研究 1a、1b 和 2a)、病人在危机(如心脏病发作、药物过量;研究 2b 和 6)后改善健康状况的可能性,以及从错误中吸取教训的可能性(研究 3-5)。这种效应具体表现为高估失败后的成功(研究 4),以及抹去最初失败的提及,而实际上失败已经纠正了问题(研究 2a 和 2b)。高估成功的原因至少有一部分是由于人们认为失败比实际情况更重要(研究 5 和 6)。纠正这种高估具有政策意义。当公民了解到失败后成功的真实比率时,他们会更加支持旨在帮助陷入困境的人群(如吸毒成瘾者、前罪犯)从过去的错误中吸取教训的康复计划(研究 7a-7c)。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,版权所有。)
{"title":"The exaggerated benefits of failure.","authors":"Lauren Eskreis-Winkler, Kaitlin Woolley, Eda Erensoy, Minhee Kim","doi":"10.1037/xge0001610","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commencement speakers, business leaders, and the popular press tell us that failure has at least one benefit: It fuels success. Does it? Across 11 studies, including a field study of medical professionals, predictors overestimated the rate at which people course correct following failure (Studies 1-4). Predictors overestimated the likelihood that professionals who fail a professional exam (e.g., the bar exam, the medical boards) pass a retest (Studies 1a, 1b, and 2a), the likelihood that patients improve their health after a crisis (e.g., heart attack, drug overdose; Studies 2b and 6), and the probability, more generally, of learning from one's mistakes (Studies 3-5). This effect was specific to overestimating success following failure (Study 4) and erasing mention of an initial failure that had actually occurred corrected the problem (Studies 2a and 2b). The success overestimate was due, at least in part, to the belief that people attend to failure more than they do (Studies 5 and 6). Correcting this overestimate had policy implications. Citizens apprised of the sobering true rate of postfailure success increased their support for rehabilitative initiatives aimed at helping struggling populations (e.g., people with addiction, ex-convicts) learn from past mistakes (Studies 7a-7c). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The magnitude of the testing effect is independent of retrieval practice performance. 测试效果的大小与检索练习的成绩无关。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001593
Jason C K Chan, Sara D Davis, Aslı Yurtsever, Sarah J Myers

Practicing retrieval is a potent learning enhancer. Theoretical accounts of the testing effect generally suggest that the magnitude of the testing effect is dependent on retrieval practice performance, such that conditions that promote better retrieval practice performance should result in a greater testing effect. Empirical evidence, however, has been mixed. Although some studies showed a positive association between retrieval practice performance and the testing effect, others have shown either no relation or the reverse. In the present study, we experimentally manipulated retrieval practice performance using a retrieval-based response deadline manipulation and an encoding-based study trial manipulation. Across six experiments, the magnitude of the testing effect was independent of retrieval practice performance. However, when we aggregated the data across the experiments, participants with superior retrieval practice performance showed a greater testing effect-an individual difference. This dissociation between experimental and correlational outcomes suggests that the positive relation between retrieval practice performance and the testing effect is not causal, and indeed, simulation data showed that the correlation between retrieval practice performance and testing effect was an artifact. We discuss the challenges these findings present to existing accounts of the testing effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

检索练习是一种有效的学习促进手段。关于测试效应的理论解释一般认为,测试效应的大小取决于检索练习的表现,因此,促进检索练习表现更好的条件应导致更大的测试效应。然而,经验证据却喜忧参半。虽然有些研究显示检索练习成绩与测试效果之间存在正相关,但其他研究则显示两者之间没有关系或关系相反。在本研究中,我们利用基于检索的反应截止时间操纵和基于编码的学习试验操纵,对检索练习成绩进行了实验操纵。在六次实验中,测试效应的大小与检索练习成绩无关。然而,当我们汇总各实验数据时,检索练习成绩优秀的参与者表现出了更大的测试效应--个体差异。实验结果和相关结果之间的这种分离表明,检索练习成绩和测试效果之间的正相关关系并不是因果关系,事实上,模拟数据表明,检索练习成绩和测试效果之间的相关关系是一种伪现象。我们将讨论这些发现给现有的测试效应理论带来的挑战。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"The magnitude of the testing effect is independent of retrieval practice performance.","authors":"Jason C K Chan, Sara D Davis, Aslı Yurtsever, Sarah J Myers","doi":"10.1037/xge0001593","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practicing retrieval is a potent learning enhancer. Theoretical accounts of the testing effect generally suggest that the magnitude of the testing effect is dependent on retrieval practice performance, such that conditions that promote better retrieval practice performance should result in a greater testing effect. Empirical evidence, however, has been mixed. Although some studies showed a positive association between retrieval practice performance and the testing effect, others have shown either no relation or the reverse. In the present study, we experimentally manipulated retrieval practice performance using a retrieval-based response deadline manipulation and an encoding-based study trial manipulation. Across six experiments, the magnitude of the testing effect was independent of retrieval practice performance. However, when we aggregated the data across the experiments, participants with superior retrieval practice performance showed a greater testing effect-an individual difference. This dissociation between experimental and correlational outcomes suggests that the positive relation between retrieval practice performance and the testing effect is not causal, and indeed, simulation data showed that the correlation between retrieval practice performance and testing effect was an artifact. We discuss the challenges these findings present to existing accounts of the testing effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Task switch costs scale with dissimilarity between task rules. 任务切换成本随任务规则之间的差异而增加。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001598
Bettina Bustos, J Toby Mordkoff, Eliot Hazeltine, Jiefeng Jiang

Cognitive flexibility enables humans to voluntarily switch tasks. Task switching requires replacing the previously active task representation with a new one, an operation that typically results in a switch cost. Thus, understanding cognitive flexibility requires understanding how tasks are represented in the brain. We hypothesize that task representations are cognitive map-like, such that the magnitude of the difference between task representations reflects their conceptual differences: The greater the distinction between the two task representations, the more updating is required. This hypothesis predicts that switch costs should increase with between task dissimilarity. To test this hypothesis, we use an experimental design that parametrically manipulates the similarity between task rules. We observe that response time scales with the dissimilarity between the task rules. The findings shed light on the organizational principles of task representations and extend the conventional binary task-switch effect (task repeat vs. switch) to a theoretical framework with parametric task switches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

认知灵活性使人类能够自愿切换任务。任务切换需要用一个新的任务表征替换之前的活动任务表征,这一操作通常会产生切换成本。因此,要理解认知灵活性,就必须了解大脑是如何表征任务的。我们假设任务表征类似于认知地图,因此任务表征之间的差异大小反映了它们在概念上的不同:两个任务表征之间的差异越大,所需的更新就越多。根据这一假设,切换成本会随着任务之间差异的增加而增加。为了验证这一假设,我们采用了一种实验设计,从参数上操纵任务规则之间的相似性。我们观察到,响应时间与任务规则之间的不相似性成比例关系。这些发现揭示了任务表征的组织原理,并将传统的二元任务切换效应(任务重复与切换)扩展到了参数任务切换的理论框架中。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Task switch costs scale with dissimilarity between task rules.","authors":"Bettina Bustos, J Toby Mordkoff, Eliot Hazeltine, Jiefeng Jiang","doi":"10.1037/xge0001598","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive flexibility enables humans to voluntarily switch tasks. Task switching requires replacing the previously active task representation with a new one, an operation that typically results in a switch cost. Thus, understanding cognitive flexibility requires understanding how tasks are represented in the brain. We hypothesize that task representations are cognitive map-like, such that the magnitude of the difference between task representations reflects their conceptual differences: The greater the distinction between the two task representations, the more updating is required. This hypothesis predicts that switch costs should increase with between task dissimilarity. To test this hypothesis, we use an experimental design that parametrically manipulates the similarity between task rules. We observe that response time scales with the dissimilarity between the task rules. The findings shed light on the organizational principles of task representations and extend the conventional binary task-switch effect (task repeat vs. switch) to a theoretical framework with parametric task switches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250929/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Communicative efficiency in multimodal language directed at children and adults. 针对儿童和成人的多模态语言的交流效率。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001588
Beata Grzyb, Stefan L Frank, Gabriella Vigliocco

The ecology of human communication is face to face. In these contexts, speakers dynamically modify their communication across vocal (e.g., speaking rate) and gestural (e.g., cospeech gestures related in meaning to the content of speech) channels while speaking. What is the function of these adjustments? Here we ask whether speakers dynamically make these adjustments to increase communicative success, and decrease cognitive effort while speaking. We assess whether speakers modulate word durations and produce iconic (i.e., imagistically evoking properties of referents) gestures depending on the predictability of each word they utter. Predictability is operationalized as surprisal and computed from computational language models trained on corpora of child-directed, or adult-directed language. Using data from a novel corpus (Ecological Language Corpus) of naturalistic interactions between adult-child (aged 3-4), and adult-adult, we show that surprisal predicts speakers' multimodal adjustments and that some of these effects are modulated by whether the comprehender is a child or an adult. Thus, communicative efficiency applies generally across vocal and gestural communicative channels not being limited to structural properties of language or vocal modality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

人类交流的生态环境是面对面的。在这种情况下,说话者在说话时会动态地调整他们在声音(如语速)和手势(如与说话内容相关的共同言语手势)方面的交流。这些调整的作用是什么?在这里,我们要问的是,说话者是否会在说话时动态地进行这些调整,以提高交际成功率并减少认知努力。我们将评估说话者是否会根据他们说出的每个单词的可预测性来调整单词的持续时间并做出标志性(即通过想象唤起所指事物的属性)手势。可预测性被操作化为惊奇,并通过在儿童或成人语言语料库中训练的计算语言模型进行计算。通过使用来自成人-儿童(3-4 岁)和成人-成人之间自然互动的新型语料库(生态语言语料库)的数据,我们发现,惊奇可以预测说话者的多模态调整,而且其中一些效果会受到理解者是儿童还是成人的影响。因此,交际效率普遍适用于发声和手势交际渠道,而不局限于语言或发声方式的结构属性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Communicative efficiency in multimodal language directed at children and adults.","authors":"Beata Grzyb, Stefan L Frank, Gabriella Vigliocco","doi":"10.1037/xge0001588","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001588","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ecology of human communication is face to face. In these contexts, speakers dynamically modify their communication across vocal (e.g., speaking rate) and gestural (e.g., cospeech gestures related in meaning to the content of speech) channels while speaking. What is the function of these adjustments? Here we ask whether speakers dynamically make these adjustments to increase communicative success, and decrease cognitive effort while speaking. We assess whether speakers modulate word durations and produce iconic (i.e., imagistically evoking properties of referents) gestures depending on the predictability of each word they utter. Predictability is operationalized as surprisal and computed from computational language models trained on corpora of child-directed, or adult-directed language. Using data from a novel corpus (Ecological Language Corpus) of naturalistic interactions between adult-child (aged 3-4), and adult-adult, we show that surprisal predicts speakers' multimodal adjustments and that some of these effects are modulated by whether the comprehender is a child or an adult. Thus, communicative efficiency applies generally across vocal and gestural communicative channels not being limited to structural properties of language or vocal modality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141261719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition. 衰老会损害反应注意控制,但不会损害主动分心抑制。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001602
Andy Jeesu Kim, Joshua Senior, Sonali Chu, Mara Mather

Older adults tend to be more prone to distraction compared with young adults, and this age-related deficit has been attributed to a deficiency in inhibitory processing. However, recent findings challenge the notion that aging leads to global impairments in inhibition. To reconcile these mixed findings, we investigated how aging modulates multiple mechanisms of attentional control by tracking the timing and direction of eye movements. When engaged in feature-search mode and proactive distractor suppression, older adults made fewer first fixations to the target but inhibited the task-irrelevant salient distractor as effectively as did young adults. However, when engaged in singleton-search mode and required to reactively disengage from the distractor, older adults made significantly more first saccades toward the task-irrelevant salient distractor and showed increased fixation times in orienting to the target, longer dwell times on incorrect saccades, and increased saccadic reaction times compared with young adults. Our findings reveal that aging differently impairs attentional control depending on whether visual search requires proactive distractor suppression or reactive distractor disengagement. Furthermore, our oculomotor measures reveal both age-related deficits and age equivalence in various mechanisms of attention, including goal-directed orienting, selection history, disengagement, and distractor inhibition. These findings help explain why conclusions of age-related declines or age equivalence in mechanisms of attentional control are task specific and reveal that older adults do not exhibit global impairments in mechanisms of inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

与年轻人相比,老年人往往更容易分心,这种与年龄有关的缺陷被归因于抑制处理能力的不足。然而,最近的研究结果对衰老导致抑制能力全面受损的观点提出了质疑。为了调和这些混杂的研究结果,我们通过追踪眼球运动的时间和方向,研究了衰老如何调节注意力控制的多种机制。当处于特征搜索模式并主动抑制分心物时,老年人对目标的首次固定次数较少,但对与任务无关的突出分心物的抑制却与年轻人一样有效。然而,与年轻人相比,当采用单体搜索模式并要求老年人反应性地脱离分心物时,老年人对与任务无关的突出分心物的首次注视次数明显增多,而且在定向目标时的凝视时间增加,错误注视的停留时间延长,注视反应时间增加。我们的研究结果表明,根据视觉搜索需要主动抑制分心物还是被动脱离分心物,衰老会对注意力控制造成不同程度的损害。此外,我们的眼球运动测量结果显示,在目标定向、选择历程、脱离和分心抑制等各种注意机制方面,既存在与年龄相关的缺陷,也存在年龄等同性。这些发现有助于解释为什么注意力控制机制中与年龄相关的下降或年龄相等的结论是针对特定任务的,并揭示了老年人在抑制机制中并没有表现出全面的障碍。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.","authors":"Andy Jeesu Kim, Joshua Senior, Sonali Chu, Mara Mather","doi":"10.1037/xge0001602","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults tend to be more prone to distraction compared with young adults, and this age-related deficit has been attributed to a deficiency in inhibitory processing. However, recent findings challenge the notion that aging leads to global impairments in inhibition. To reconcile these mixed findings, we investigated how aging modulates multiple mechanisms of attentional control by tracking the timing and direction of eye movements. When engaged in feature-search mode and proactive distractor suppression, older adults made fewer first fixations to the target but inhibited the task-irrelevant salient distractor as effectively as did young adults. However, when engaged in singleton-search mode and required to reactively disengage from the distractor, older adults made significantly more first saccades toward the task-irrelevant salient distractor and showed increased fixation times in orienting to the target, longer dwell times on incorrect saccades, and increased saccadic reaction times compared with young adults. Our findings reveal that aging differently impairs attentional control depending on whether visual search requires proactive distractor suppression or reactive distractor disengagement. Furthermore, our oculomotor measures reveal both age-related deficits and age equivalence in various mechanisms of attention, including goal-directed orienting, selection history, disengagement, and distractor inhibition. These findings help explain why conclusions of age-related declines or age equivalence in mechanisms of attentional control are task specific and reveal that older adults do not exhibit global impairments in mechanisms of inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to "When fairness is not enough: The disproportionate contributions of the poor in a collective action problem" by Malthouse et al. (2023). 对马尔萨斯等人(2023 年)"当公平还不够时:马尔萨斯等人(2023 年)撰写的 "集体行动问题中穷人不成比例的贡献 "一文的更正。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001631
Eugene Malthouse, Charlie Pilgrim, Daniel Sgroi, Thomas T Hills

Reports an error in "When fairness is not enough: The disproportionate contributions of the poor in a collective action problem" by Eugene Malthouse, Charlie Pilgrim, Daniel Sgroi and Thomas T. Hills (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2023[Nov], Vol 152[11], 3229-3242). The third and final research question in The Collective-Risk Social Dilemma section now appears as follows: 3. If what people perceive as fair is insufficient to solve the problem, under what conditions do groups still manage to succeed? All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-92402-001.) Many of our most pressing challenges, from combating climate change to dealing with pandemics, are collective action problems: situations in which individual and collective interests conflict with each other. In such situations, people face a dilemma about making individually costly but collectively beneficial contributions to the common good. Understanding which factors influence people's willingness to make these contributions is vital for the design of policies and institutions that support the attainment of collective goals. In this study, we investigate how inequalities, and different causes of inequalities, impact individual-level behavior and group-level outcomes. First, we find that what people judged to be fair was not enough to solve the collective action problem: if they acted according to what they thought was fair, they would collectively fail. Second, the level of wealth (rich vs. poor) altered what was judged to be a fair contribution to the public good more than the cause of wealth (merit vs. luck vs. uncertain). Contributions during the game reflected these fairness judgments, with poorer individuals consistently contributing a higher proportion of their wealth than richer participants, which further increased inequality-particularly in successful groups. Finally, the cause of one's wealth was largely irrelevant, mattering most only when it was uncertain, as opposed to resulting from merit or luck. We discuss implications for policymakers and international climate change negotiations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

报告 Eugene Malthouse、Charlie Pilgrim、Daniel Sgroi 和 Thomas T. Hills 合著的《当公平不够时:Eugene Malthouse、Charlie Pilgrim、Daniel Sgroi 和 Thomas T. Hills 合著的《集体行动问题中穷人不成比例的贡献》(《实验心理学杂志》:General, 2023[11月],第152[11]卷,3229-3242)。现在,"集体风险社会困境 "部分的第三个也是最后一个研究问题如下:3.如果人们认为的公平不足以解决问题,那么在什么条件下,群体仍能取得成功?本文所有版本均已更正。(原文摘要如下,载于 2023-92402-001 号记录)。从应对气候变化到处理流行病,我们面临的许多最紧迫的挑战都是集体行动问题:即个人利益和集体利益相互冲突的情况。在这种情况下,人们面临着一种两难选择,即为共同利益做出个人付出高昂代价但集体受益的贡献。了解哪些因素会影响人们做出这些贡献的意愿,对于设计支持实现集体目标的政策和制度至关重要。在本研究中,我们调查了不平等以及造成不平等的不同原因如何影响个人层面的行为和群体层面的结果。首先,我们发现,人们认为的公平并不足以解决集体行动问题:如果他们按照自己认为的公平行事,他们就会集体失败。其次,财富水平(富人与穷人)比财富原因(功劳与运气或不确定因素)更能改变人们对公共利益公平贡献的判断。游戏中的贡献反映了这些公平性判断,较贫穷的人贡献的财富比例始终高于较富有的参与者,这进一步加剧了不平等--尤其是在成功的群体中。最后,一个人的财富来源在很大程度上是不相关的,只有当财富来源不确定时,财富来源才最重要,而不是因为优点或运气。我们讨论了这一研究对政策制定者和国际气候变化谈判的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Correction to \"When fairness is not enough: The disproportionate contributions of the poor in a collective action problem\" by Malthouse et al. (2023).","authors":"Eugene Malthouse, Charlie Pilgrim, Daniel Sgroi, Thomas T Hills","doi":"10.1037/xge0001631","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"When fairness is not enough: The disproportionate contributions of the poor in a collective action problem\" by Eugene Malthouse, Charlie Pilgrim, Daniel Sgroi and Thomas T. Hills (<i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</i>, 2023[Nov], Vol 152[11], 3229-3242). The third and final research question in The Collective-Risk Social Dilemma section now appears as follows: 3. If what people perceive as fair is insufficient to solve the problem, under what conditions do groups still manage to succeed? All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-92402-001.) Many of our most pressing challenges, from combating climate change to dealing with pandemics, are collective action problems: situations in which individual and collective interests conflict with each other. In such situations, people face a dilemma about making individually costly but collectively beneficial contributions to the common good. Understanding which factors influence people's willingness to make these contributions is vital for the design of policies and institutions that support the attainment of collective goals. In this study, we investigate how inequalities, and different causes of inequalities, impact individual-level behavior and group-level outcomes. First, we find that what people judged to be fair was not enough to solve the collective action problem: if they acted according to what they thought was fair, they would collectively fail. Second, the level of wealth (rich vs. poor) altered what was judged to be a fair contribution to the public good more than the cause of wealth (merit vs. luck vs. uncertain). Contributions during the game reflected these fairness judgments, with poorer individuals consistently contributing a higher proportion of their wealth than richer participants, which further increased inequality-particularly in successful groups. Finally, the cause of one's wealth was largely irrelevant, mattering most only when it was uncertain, as opposed to resulting from merit or luck. We discuss implications for policymakers and international climate change negotiations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325408/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to "The interpersonal costs of dishonesty: How dishonest behavior reduces individuals' ability to read others' emotions" by Lee et al. (2019). 对李等人(2019)所著《不诚实的人际成本:不诚实行为如何降低个人解读他人情绪的能力》的更正。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001591
Julia J Lee, Ashley E Hardin, Bidhan Parmar, Francesca Gino

Reports an error in "The interpersonal costs of dishonesty: How dishonest behavior reduces individuals' ability to read others' emotions" by Julia J. Lee, Ashley E. Hardin, Bidhan Parmar, and Francesca Gino (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2019[Sep], Vol 148[9], 1557-1574). Concerns were raised regarding the findings reported in Study 3 related to data exclusions that may have affected the results. As a result, the findings reported in Study 3 cannot be relied upon. The remaining base of empirical evidence presented in this publication, excluding Study 3, supports the assertion that dishonesty reduces empathic accuracy. The authors (Lee, Hardin, Parmar, & Gino) have requested this correction. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2019-38884-001.) In this research, we examine the unintended consequences of dishonest behavior for one's interpersonal abilities and subsequent ethical behavior. Specifically, we unpack how dishonest conduct can reduce one's generalized empathic accuracy-the ability to accurately read other people's emotional states. In the process, we distinguish these 2 constructs from one another and demonstrate a causal relationship. The effects of dishonesty on empathic accuracy that we found were significant, but modest in size. Across 8 studies (n = 2,588), we find support for (a) a correlational and causal account of dishonest behavior reducing empathic accuracy; (b) an underlying mechanism of reduced relational self-construal (i.e., the tendency to define the self in terms of close relationships); (c) negative downstream consequences of impaired empathic accuracy, in terms of dehumanization and subsequent dishonesty; and (d) a physiological trait (i.e., vagal reactivity) that serves as a boundary condition for the relationship between dishonest behavior and empathic accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

报告Julia J. Lee, Ashley E. Hardin, Bidhan Parmar, and Francesca Gino的 "The interpersonal costs of dishonesty: How dishonest behavior reduces individuals' ability to read others' emotions"(《实验心理学杂志》:General, 2019[Sep], Vol 148[9], 1557-1574)。有人对研究 3 中报告的结果表示担忧,因为数据排除可能会影响结果。因此,研究 3 中报告的结果不可信。除研究 3 外,本出版物中介绍的其余经验证据基础都支持不诚实会降低移情准确性的论断。作者(李、哈丁、帕玛尔和吉诺)要求更正。(以下为原文摘要,刊登于2019-38884-001号记录)。在这项研究中,我们探讨了不诚实行为对人际交往能力和后续道德行为的意外影响。具体来说,我们揭示了不诚实行为如何降低一个人的广义共情准确性--准确解读他人情绪状态的能力。在此过程中,我们将这两个概念区分开来,并证明了它们之间的因果关系。我们发现,不诚实对移情准确性的影响是显著的,但规模不大。在 8 项研究(n = 2,588 人)中,我们发现:(a)不诚实行为会降低移情准确性的相关性和因果关系;(b)降低关系自我建构(即:倾向于以自我为中心来定义自我)的潜在机制、(c) 共情准确性受损的负面下游后果,即非人化和随后的不诚实;以及 (d) 作为不诚实行为与共情准确性之间关系的边界条件的生理特征(即迷走神经反应性)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Correction to \"The interpersonal costs of dishonesty: How dishonest behavior reduces individuals' ability to read others' emotions\" by Lee et al. (2019).","authors":"Julia J Lee, Ashley E Hardin, Bidhan Parmar, Francesca Gino","doi":"10.1037/xge0001591","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"The interpersonal costs of dishonesty: How dishonest behavior reduces individuals' ability to read others' emotions\" by Julia J. Lee, Ashley E. Hardin, Bidhan Parmar, and Francesca Gino (<i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</i>, 2019[Sep], Vol 148[9], 1557-1574). Concerns were raised regarding the findings reported in Study 3 related to data exclusions that may have affected the results. As a result, the findings reported in Study 3 cannot be relied upon. The remaining base of empirical evidence presented in this publication, excluding Study 3, supports the assertion that dishonesty reduces empathic accuracy. The authors (Lee, Hardin, Parmar, & Gino) have requested this correction. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2019-38884-001.) In this research, we examine the unintended consequences of dishonest behavior for one's interpersonal abilities and subsequent ethical behavior. Specifically, we unpack how dishonest conduct can reduce one's generalized empathic accuracy-the ability to accurately read other people's emotional states. In the process, we distinguish these 2 constructs from one another and demonstrate a causal relationship. The effects of dishonesty on empathic accuracy that we found were significant, but modest in size. Across 8 studies (n = 2,588), we find support for (a) a correlational and causal account of dishonest behavior reducing empathic accuracy; (b) an underlying mechanism of reduced relational self-construal (i.e., the tendency to define the self in terms of close relationships); (c) negative downstream consequences of impaired empathic accuracy, in terms of dehumanization and subsequent dishonesty; and (d) a physiological trait (i.e., vagal reactivity) that serves as a boundary condition for the relationship between dishonest behavior and empathic accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is it personal or is it social? The interaction of knowledge domain and statistical evidence in U.S. and Chinese preschoolers' social generalizations. 是个人行为还是社会行为?中美学龄前儿童社会概括中知识领域与统计证据的相互作用。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001605
Teresa Flanagan, Xin Alice Zhao, Fei Xu, Tamar Kushnir

Children make inferences about the social world by observing human actions. However, human actions can be ambiguous: They can be sources of information about personal, idiosyncratic characteristics of individuals or socially shared knowledge. In two cross-cultural studies (N = 420; Mage = 4.05 years, SD = 0.77, 47% female), we ask if U.S. and Chinese children's inferences about whether an action is personal or social vary by domain, statistical evidence, and culture. We did this with a generalization method: Preschoolers learn about one agent's actions and then are asked what they think a new agent will do. Low rates of generalization suggest children inferred something unique to an individual, while high rates suggest that children inferred that the action represented socially shared knowledge. In a mixed between- and within-participant design, children observed agents demonstrate sequences of statistically random (or nonrandom, between participants) actions that were verbally framed as relevant to a particular domain (agent's personal preferences, labels, object functions, or game rules). We found that children's social generalizations about actions were on a continuum: with linguistic conventions (e.g., labels) being the most social, preferences being the most personal, and nonlinguistic conventions (i.e., object functions, game rules) falling somewhere in between. Furthermore, the influence of statistical evidence and cultural variation varied for each domain. These findings highlight how children combine knowledge and evidence to infer social meaning from actions and have implications for rational constructivist accounts of cultural learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

儿童通过观察人类行为来推断社会世界。然而,人类行为可能是模棱两可的:它们可能是个人特质的信息来源,也可能是社会共享知识的信息来源。在两项跨文化研究(N = 420;年龄 = 4.05 岁,SD = 0.77,47% 为女性)中,我们询问美国和中国儿童对某一行为是个人行为还是社会行为的推断是否会因领域、统计证据和文化的不同而有所差异。为此,我们采用了概括法:学龄前儿童在了解了一个代理人的行为后,会被问及他们认为一个新的代理人会做什么。概括率低说明儿童推断出了个体独有的东西,而概括率高则说明儿童推断出该行动代表了社会共享知识。在参与者之间和参与者内部的混合设计中,儿童观察代理展示了一系列统计随机(或非随机,在参与者之间)的动作,这些动作被口头描述为与特定领域(代理的个人偏好、标签、对象功能或游戏规则)相关。我们发现,儿童对行动的社会概括是一个连续统一体:语言约定(如标签)是最社会化的,偏好是最个人化的,而非语言约定(即对象功能、游戏规则)则介于两者之间。此外,统计证据和文化差异对每个领域的影响也各不相同。这些发现强调了儿童是如何结合知识和证据从行动中推断社会意义的,并对理性建构主义的文化学习理论产生了影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Is it personal or is it social? The interaction of knowledge domain and statistical evidence in U.S. and Chinese preschoolers' social generalizations.","authors":"Teresa Flanagan, Xin Alice Zhao, Fei Xu, Tamar Kushnir","doi":"10.1037/xge0001605","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children make inferences about the social world by observing human actions. However, human actions can be ambiguous: They can be sources of information about personal, idiosyncratic characteristics of individuals or socially shared knowledge. In two cross-cultural studies (<i>N</i> = 420; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 4.05 years, <i>SD</i> = 0.77, 47% female), we ask if U.S. and Chinese children's inferences about whether an action is personal or social vary by domain, statistical evidence, and culture. We did this with a generalization method: Preschoolers learn about one agent's actions and then are asked what they think a new agent will do. Low rates of generalization suggest children inferred something unique to an individual, while high rates suggest that children inferred that the action represented socially shared knowledge. In a mixed between- and within-participant design, children observed agents demonstrate sequences of statistically random (or nonrandom, between participants) actions that were verbally framed as relevant to a particular domain (agent's personal preferences, labels, object functions, or game rules). We found that children's social generalizations about actions were on a continuum: with linguistic conventions (e.g., labels) being the most social, preferences being the most personal, and nonlinguistic conventions (i.e., object functions, game rules) falling somewhere in between. Furthermore, the influence of statistical evidence and cultural variation varied for each domain. These findings highlight how children combine knowledge and evidence to infer social meaning from actions and have implications for rational constructivist accounts of cultural learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140859886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Embodied cognition comes of age: A processing advantage for action words is modulated by aging and the task. 体现认知进入老年期:动作词的加工优势受年龄和任务的影响。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001555
Alex Miklashevsky, Jana Reifegerste, Adolfo M García, Friedemann Pulvermüller, David A Balota, João Veríssimo, Michael T Ullman

Processing action words (e.g., fork, throw) engages neurocognitive motor representations, consistent with embodied cognition principles. Despite age-related neurocognitive changes that could affect action words, and a rapidly aging population, the impact of healthy aging on action-word processing is poorly understood. Previous research suggests that in lexical tasks demanding semantic access, such as picture naming, higher motor-relatedness can enhance performance (e.g., fork vs. pier)-particularly in older adults, perhaps due to the age-related relative sparing of motor-semantic circuitry, which can support action words. However, motor-relatedness was recently found to affect performance in younger but not older adults in lexical decision. We hypothesized this was due to decreased semantic access in this task, especially in older adults. Here we tested effects of motor-relatedness on 2,174 words in younger and older adults not only in lexical decision but also in reading aloud, in which semantic access is minimal. Mixed-effects regression, controlling for phonological, lexical, and semantic variables, yielded results consistent with our predictions. In lexical decision, younger adults were faster and more accurate at words with higher-motor relatedness, whereas older adults showed no motor-relatedness effects. In reading aloud, neither age group showed such effects. Multiple sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the patterns were robust. Altogether, whereas previous research indicates that in lexical tasks demanding semantic access, higher motor-relatedness can enhance performance, especially in older adults, evidence now suggests that such effects are attenuated with decreased semantic access, which in turn depends on the task as well as aging itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

处理动作词(如叉、扔)需要神经认知的运动表征,这与具身认知原理是一致的。尽管与年龄相关的神经认知变化可能会影响动作词,而且人口老龄化速度很快,但人们对健康老龄化对动作词处理的影响却知之甚少。以前的研究表明,在要求语义访问的词汇任务中,如图片命名,较高的运动相关性可以提高成绩(如叉子与墩子)--特别是在老年人中,这可能是由于与年龄相关的运动-语义回路相对稀缺,而运动-语义回路可以支持动作词。然而,最近有研究发现,运动相关性会影响年轻成年人的词汇决策能力,而不会影响老年人的词汇决策能力。我们假设这是由于在这项任务中语义访问能力下降所致,尤其是在老年人中。在这里,我们测试了运动相关性对 2,174 个单词的影响,这些单词不仅出现在年轻和老年人的词汇判断中,而且还出现在朗读中,而在朗读中语义访问是最小的。通过控制语音、词汇和语义变量的混合效应回归,结果与我们的预测一致。在词汇决策中,年轻成人对运动相关性较高的单词反应更快、更准确,而老年人则没有表现出运动相关性的影响。在朗读方面,两个年龄组都没有表现出这种效应。多重敏感性分析表明,这些模式是稳健的。总之,以前的研究表明,在需要语义访问的词汇任务中,较高的运动相关性可以提高成绩,尤其是在老年人中,而现在的证据表明,这种效应会随着语义访问的减少而减弱,这反过来又取决于任务和衰老本身。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Embodied cognition comes of age: A processing advantage for action words is modulated by aging and the task.","authors":"Alex Miklashevsky, Jana Reifegerste, Adolfo M García, Friedemann Pulvermüller, David A Balota, João Veríssimo, Michael T Ullman","doi":"10.1037/xge0001555","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xge0001555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Processing action words (e.g., <i>fork, throw</i>) engages neurocognitive motor representations, consistent with embodied cognition principles. Despite age-related neurocognitive changes that could affect action words, and a rapidly aging population, the impact of healthy aging on action-word processing is poorly understood. Previous research suggests that in lexical tasks demanding semantic access, such as picture naming, higher motor-relatedness can enhance performance (e.g., <i>fork</i> vs<i>. pier</i>)-particularly in older adults, perhaps due to the age-related relative sparing of motor-semantic circuitry, which can support action words. However, motor-relatedness was recently found to affect performance in younger but not older adults in lexical decision. We hypothesized this was due to decreased semantic access in this task, especially in older adults. Here we tested effects of motor-relatedness on 2,174 words in younger and older adults not only in lexical decision but also in reading aloud, in which semantic access is minimal. Mixed-effects regression, controlling for phonological, lexical, and semantic variables, yielded results consistent with our predictions. In lexical decision, younger adults were faster and more accurate at words with higher-motor relatedness, whereas older adults showed no motor-relatedness effects. In reading aloud, neither age group showed such effects. Multiple sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the patterns were robust. Altogether, whereas previous research indicates that in lexical tasks demanding semantic access, higher motor-relatedness can enhance performance, especially in older adults, evidence now suggests that such effects are attenuated with decreased semantic access, which in turn depends on the task as well as aging itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Infants and toddlers in the United States with more close relationships have larger vocabularies. 在美国,关系更亲密的婴幼儿词汇量更大。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001609
Asana Okocha, Nicole Burke, Casey Lew-Williams

Young children learn language from their caregivers, family members, and friends. However, with few exceptions, contemporary developmental scientists have studied language input and language learning through the lens of the primary caregiver and the nuclear family, rather than the infants' broader communities. In many communities-and increasingly in the United States-nonnuclear family structures are common, and extended kin, fictive kin, and intergenerational relationships are relied upon for child care. Understanding children's relationships within kinship networks can allow for more inclusive depictions of children's social interactions and their language experiences. We drew upon methods used by researchers studying social networks to assess U.S. infants' and toddlers' network composition. Results showed that young children with a greater number of close relationships (but not those with larger networks overall) had larger vocabularies, after controlling for age and socioeconomic status. These findings suggest that distributed models of child-rearing are an influential factor in early language growth and call for increased attention to social networks for understanding children's developmental trajectories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

幼儿从看护人、家庭成员和朋友那里学习语言。然而,除了极少数例外,当代发育科学家都是通过主要照顾者和核心家庭,而不是婴儿所在的更广泛社区的视角来研究语言输入和语言学习的。在许多社区--在美国也越来越多--非核心家庭结构很常见,儿童的照料依赖于大家庭、虚构的亲戚和代际关系。了解儿童在亲属网络中的关系,可以更全面地描述儿童的社会互动及其语言体验。我们借鉴了社会网络研究人员使用的方法来评估美国婴幼儿的网络构成。结果表明,在控制了年龄和社会经济地位之后,拥有更多亲密关系的幼儿(但不是拥有更大网络的幼儿)拥有更大的词汇量。这些研究结果表明,分布式儿童养育模式是早期语言成长的一个影响因素,并呼吁人们在了解儿童的成长轨迹时更多地关注社会网络。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Infants and toddlers in the United States with more close relationships have larger vocabularies.","authors":"Asana Okocha, Nicole Burke, Casey Lew-Williams","doi":"10.1037/xge0001609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001609","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young children learn language from their caregivers, family members, and friends. However, with few exceptions, contemporary developmental scientists have studied language input and language learning through the lens of the primary caregiver and the nuclear family, rather than the infants' broader communities. In many communities-and increasingly in the United States-nonnuclear family structures are common, and extended kin, fictive kin, and intergenerational relationships are relied upon for child care. Understanding children's relationships within kinship networks can allow for more inclusive depictions of children's social interactions and their language experiences. We drew upon methods used by researchers studying social networks to assess U.S. infants' and toddlers' network composition. Results showed that young children with a greater number of close relationships (but not those with larger networks overall) had larger vocabularies, after controlling for age and socioeconomic status. These findings suggest that distributed models of child-rearing are an influential factor in early language growth and call for increased attention to social networks for understanding children's developmental trajectories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141446296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1