Pub Date : 2022-06-26DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2093175
Mark Koelman, T. Hartmann, T. Spit
ABSTRACT The transition to a renewable energy future requires the extensive expansion of current high voltage grids. Due to the amount of land needed for expansion, issues related to land use have led to increased grid development opposition among landowners which in turn leads to significant project planning and budget overruns. Yet knowledge about why landowners support or object to high voltage grid development is limited. In this study, we use a theory on pluralism to uncover and categorize the multiplicity of motivations of 200 individual landowners in the Netherlands. Our results indicate that only a small number of landowners who oppose grid development focus on individual monetary gain through compensation for limits on their land use. Furthermore, most landowners find the fair and equal distribution of both the advantages and disadvantages of such limits more important than individual financial compensation. As such, overcoming contentious land use issues related to high voltage grid development by way of high individual financial compensation isn’t the only solution. Highlights Land use conflicts affect expansions of high voltage grids crucial for meeting CO2 objectives Motivations of landowners are unevenly divided among different rationalities Most individual landowners do support high voltage grid developments Individual financial compensation isn’t the only solution
{"title":"It’s not all about the money—landowner motivation and high voltage grid development","authors":"Mark Koelman, T. Hartmann, T. Spit","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2093175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2093175","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The transition to a renewable energy future requires the extensive expansion of current high voltage grids. Due to the amount of land needed for expansion, issues related to land use have led to increased grid development opposition among landowners which in turn leads to significant project planning and budget overruns. Yet knowledge about why landowners support or object to high voltage grid development is limited. In this study, we use a theory on pluralism to uncover and categorize the multiplicity of motivations of 200 individual landowners in the Netherlands. Our results indicate that only a small number of landowners who oppose grid development focus on individual monetary gain through compensation for limits on their land use. Furthermore, most landowners find the fair and equal distribution of both the advantages and disadvantages of such limits more important than individual financial compensation. As such, overcoming contentious land use issues related to high voltage grid development by way of high individual financial compensation isn’t the only solution. Highlights Land use conflicts affect expansions of high voltage grids crucial for meeting CO2 objectives Motivations of landowners are unevenly divided among different rationalities Most individual landowners do support high voltage grid developments Individual financial compensation isn’t the only solution","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"8 1","pages":"211 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73860113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-13DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931
J. M. Smallwood, I. Delabre, S. Pinheiro Vergara, P. Rowhani
ABSTRACT Continued conversion of tropical forests to agriculture risks jeopardising planetary integrity. The UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets to halt deforestation by 2020, alongside other global measures for zero deforestation, were not achieved. Applying a governmentality lens, we aim to better understand global governance mechanisms for tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and identify opportunities to improve them post 2020. We rely on data from global measures, institutions, and interviews with public and private actors working on tropical forest and food policy to undertake a discourse analysis of the (i) SDGs and other global measures on forests and food systems, (ii) contexts of the institutions studied, and (iii) implementation of global measures relating to forests and sustainable food systems. Our analysis reveals six discursive themes: (1) Policy framing of tropical forests – a token effort (2) Deceptive interlinkages, (3) Participation of the usual suspects, (4) Insufficient stakeholder representation, (5) Cleaning up supply chains and, (6) A green recovery. The themes show how the promotion and reproduction of neoliberal values of tropical forests consistently inhibit conservation, negatively impacting on planetary integrity. We identify opportunities to shift towards a new governmentality for informing international efforts on tackling tropical deforestation post-2020.
{"title":"The governmentality of tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and possibilities for post-2020 sustainability governance","authors":"J. M. Smallwood, I. Delabre, S. Pinheiro Vergara, P. Rowhani","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082931","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Continued conversion of tropical forests to agriculture risks jeopardising planetary integrity. The UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets to halt deforestation by 2020, alongside other global measures for zero deforestation, were not achieved. Applying a governmentality lens, we aim to better understand global governance mechanisms for tropical forests and sustainable food systems, and identify opportunities to improve them post 2020. We rely on data from global measures, institutions, and interviews with public and private actors working on tropical forest and food policy to undertake a discourse analysis of the (i) SDGs and other global measures on forests and food systems, (ii) contexts of the institutions studied, and (iii) implementation of global measures relating to forests and sustainable food systems. Our analysis reveals six discursive themes: (1) Policy framing of tropical forests – a token effort (2) Deceptive interlinkages, (3) Participation of the usual suspects, (4) Insufficient stakeholder representation, (5) Cleaning up supply chains and, (6) A green recovery. The themes show how the promotion and reproduction of neoliberal values of tropical forests consistently inhibit conservation, negatively impacting on planetary integrity. We identify opportunities to shift towards a new governmentality for informing international efforts on tackling tropical deforestation post-2020.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"8 1","pages":"103 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88530009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-06DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2084603
Martin Laurenceau, F. Molle
ABSTRACT In Europe, improvements in water-use efficiency have been encouraged in order to achieve the Water Framework Directive’s environmental goals. However, it is often unclear where the saved water (if any) goes and to what extent it benefits aquatic ecosystems. While the technical aspects of this question have been widely debated, its political dimensions have seldom been addressed. In particular, few studies have examined the formulation, implementation or governance of policy tools aimed at reallocating ‘saved water’ to the environment. In the Durance River Basin (south-east France), a Water Saving Account (WSA) was created to facilitate the reallocation of water savings to aquatic ecosystems. Combining the political sociology of policy instruments and historical neo-institutionalist approaches, we show that, rather than fundamentally reordering water distribution, the WSA constitutes an ambiguous arrangement that favours the continuation of water savings investments – a policy that is compatible with a large array of objectives and interests – while at the same time embodying and manifesting the new environmental goals and rationale of the Agence de l’eau (Water Agency). We underline the key role of ambiguity in making ‘things which hold together’ and facilitating consensus among the main actors involved. Highlights The reallocation of ‘saved water’ from investments in irrigation efficiency to the environment in the Durance Basin is aided by a Water Saving Account (WSA). Institutional, technological and cognitive path-dependent factors have shaped the settings of the WSA. Rather than deeply reordering water distribution, the WSA constitutes an ambiguous arrangement that favours the continuation of water savings investments. Ambiguities can be instrumental in reaching new institutional arrangements.
{"title":"A convenient untruth: environmental water reallocation and the art of ambiguous arrangements in south-east France","authors":"Martin Laurenceau, F. Molle","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2084603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2084603","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Europe, improvements in water-use efficiency have been encouraged in order to achieve the Water Framework Directive’s environmental goals. However, it is often unclear where the saved water (if any) goes and to what extent it benefits aquatic ecosystems. While the technical aspects of this question have been widely debated, its political dimensions have seldom been addressed. In particular, few studies have examined the formulation, implementation or governance of policy tools aimed at reallocating ‘saved water’ to the environment. In the Durance River Basin (south-east France), a Water Saving Account (WSA) was created to facilitate the reallocation of water savings to aquatic ecosystems. Combining the political sociology of policy instruments and historical neo-institutionalist approaches, we show that, rather than fundamentally reordering water distribution, the WSA constitutes an ambiguous arrangement that favours the continuation of water savings investments – a policy that is compatible with a large array of objectives and interests – while at the same time embodying and manifesting the new environmental goals and rationale of the Agence de l’eau (Water Agency). We underline the key role of ambiguity in making ‘things which hold together’ and facilitating consensus among the main actors involved. Highlights The reallocation of ‘saved water’ from investments in irrigation efficiency to the environment in the Durance Basin is aided by a Water Saving Account (WSA). Institutional, technological and cognitive path-dependent factors have shaped the settings of the WSA. Rather than deeply reordering water distribution, the WSA constitutes an ambiguous arrangement that favours the continuation of water savings investments. Ambiguities can be instrumental in reaching new institutional arrangements.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"15 1","pages":"118 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78482404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-06DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082932
J. Britton, B. Woodman, J. Webb
ABSTRACT Heat networks could play a significant role in energy system decarbonisation. Unlike much energy infrastructure, heat networks are developed at a local-scale, raising questions about which actors and institutions, at which scales, will most effectively deliver networks. This paper examines different ideas about the role of local government and the translation of those ideas into the institutional framework for heat networks in England. The paper applies a discursive institutionalist approach to analyse ideas and discourses across three case studies and at the national level. We argue that there is a push back by local governments against the UK government dominant discourse of the efficient market in respect to heat network development. This model constitutes the role of local governments as enabling and convening actors, while emphasising techno-economic feasibility and private finance. There is, however, evidence of local governments specifying a more central ensuring role and incorporating local public goods beyond financial returns. We highlight ideational bricolage as a process by which the local state can mobilise ideational power to challenge dominant discourses. This demonstrates how powerful institutions, and their discursive components, can be disrupted – and potentially displaced – by locally led emergent, and perhaps only partially coherent, assemblages of ideas.
{"title":"Ideational bricolage as a route to transforming local institutions for heat decarbonisation: heat networks and local government in England","authors":"J. Britton, B. Woodman, J. Webb","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2082932","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Heat networks could play a significant role in energy system decarbonisation. Unlike much energy infrastructure, heat networks are developed at a local-scale, raising questions about which actors and institutions, at which scales, will most effectively deliver networks. This paper examines different ideas about the role of local government and the translation of those ideas into the institutional framework for heat networks in England. The paper applies a discursive institutionalist approach to analyse ideas and discourses across three case studies and at the national level. We argue that there is a push back by local governments against the UK government dominant discourse of the efficient market in respect to heat network development. This model constitutes the role of local governments as enabling and convening actors, while emphasising techno-economic feasibility and private finance. There is, however, evidence of local governments specifying a more central ensuring role and incorporating local public goods beyond financial returns. We highlight ideational bricolage as a process by which the local state can mobilise ideational power to challenge dominant discourses. This demonstrates how powerful institutions, and their discursive components, can be disrupted – and potentially displaced – by locally led emergent, and perhaps only partially coherent, assemblages of ideas.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"45 1","pages":"449 - 462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78624889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2078290
Samuel C. Bingaman, J. Firestone, D. Bidwell
ABSTRACT Understanding how local attitudes toward commercial-scale renewable energy change over time should provide insight into how to engage communities and influence public acceptance during the energy transition. To augment the scarcity of longitudinal research on social acceptance of renewable energy, we use a mixed methods approach to explore how opinions regarding the Block Island Offshore Wind Project changed over time. We analyze two-year panel data from a survey of Block Island and coastal RI residents with a regression model and interviews to observe how opinions were influenced by attitude strength attributes, esthetics, general attitude towards wind power, process fairness, and demographics. Using the multi-layered results, we produce recommendations for stakeholders to better foster community relations from planning to operation. Abbreviations: Block Island Offshore Wind Project (BIOWP): Block Island; (BI): Rhode Island; (RI): Relative risk ratio; (RRR): Power purchase agreement (PPA)
{"title":"Winds of change: examining attitude shifts regarding an offshore wind project","authors":"Samuel C. Bingaman, J. Firestone, D. Bidwell","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2078290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2078290","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Understanding how local attitudes toward commercial-scale renewable energy change over time should provide insight into how to engage communities and influence public acceptance during the energy transition. To augment the scarcity of longitudinal research on social acceptance of renewable energy, we use a mixed methods approach to explore how opinions regarding the Block Island Offshore Wind Project changed over time. We analyze two-year panel data from a survey of Block Island and coastal RI residents with a regression model and interviews to observe how opinions were influenced by attitude strength attributes, esthetics, general attitude towards wind power, process fairness, and demographics. Using the multi-layered results, we produce recommendations for stakeholders to better foster community relations from planning to operation. Abbreviations: Block Island Offshore Wind Project (BIOWP): Block Island; (BI): Rhode Island; (RI): Relative risk ratio; (RRR): Power purchase agreement (PPA)","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"11 1","pages":"55 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89864848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-30DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2079476
C. Patsias
ABSTRACT This article examines middle- and working-class citizens’ opposition to green policies in two Montreal boroughs. Through observation of council meetings, it seeks to understand how citizens discuss green policies in local political institutions. In this study, citizens do not oppose environmental policies by principle nor deny the existence of environmental problems. Rather, they feel swept along by a ‘green revolution’ for which they will bear most of the costs without any short-term benefit. In order to voice this concern, they tend to use the notion of environmental justice in opposition to environmental policies. Their understanding of environmental justice merges a procedural critique of democracy regarding participation and transparency and a substantial critique of inequities in the distribution of the environmental burden. These citizens also manifest an attachment to their neighborhood that connects the environment to the concept of the common good and an exercise of democracy. In this regard, this study reveals how citizens who mobilized within institutions come to a political understanding of environmental issues through the notion of environmental justice.
{"title":"Environmental justice against environmental policies: the example of Montreal boroughs","authors":"C. Patsias","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2079476","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2079476","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines middle- and working-class citizens’ opposition to green policies in two Montreal boroughs. Through observation of council meetings, it seeks to understand how citizens discuss green policies in local political institutions. In this study, citizens do not oppose environmental policies by principle nor deny the existence of environmental problems. Rather, they feel swept along by a ‘green revolution’ for which they will bear most of the costs without any short-term benefit. In order to voice this concern, they tend to use the notion of environmental justice in opposition to environmental policies. Their understanding of environmental justice merges a procedural critique of democracy regarding participation and transparency and a substantial critique of inequities in the distribution of the environmental burden. These citizens also manifest an attachment to their neighborhood that connects the environment to the concept of the common good and an exercise of democracy. In this regard, this study reveals how citizens who mobilized within institutions come to a political understanding of environmental issues through the notion of environmental justice.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"39 1","pages":"74 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76672982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-18DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2076661
R. Røste
ABSTRACT The attention that has been drawn to urban experimentation has contributed to new knowledge of the role of local governance for a sustainable transition. Still, there remains little knowledge of how municipalities can foster experimentation and that may result in real change across the protected spaces of experimentation and the existing policy structures. This paper aims at exploring how experimental governance result in real policy change over time by reviewing related discussions from the cross-disciplinary fields of sustainability transition and collaborative innovation, and by discussing findings from a longitudinal case study of an emerging innovation for sustainable mobility services in Oslo. This longitudinal study shows how experimental governance have played various roles at different times in the emerging innovation: promoting innovation, destabilising existing policy arrangements, transforming institutional routines and co-creating shared interests. The findings demonstrate the critical co-evolutionary dynamics of experimental governance, transforming existing policy structures over time.
{"title":"Co-evolutionary dynamics of experimental governance: a longitudinal study of sustainable mobility services in Oslo","authors":"R. Røste","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2076661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2076661","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The attention that has been drawn to urban experimentation has contributed to new knowledge of the role of local governance for a sustainable transition. Still, there remains little knowledge of how municipalities can foster experimentation and that may result in real change across the protected spaces of experimentation and the existing policy structures. This paper aims at exploring how experimental governance result in real policy change over time by reviewing related discussions from the cross-disciplinary fields of sustainability transition and collaborative innovation, and by discussing findings from a longitudinal case study of an emerging innovation for sustainable mobility services in Oslo. This longitudinal study shows how experimental governance have played various roles at different times in the emerging innovation: promoting innovation, destabilising existing policy arrangements, transforming institutional routines and co-creating shared interests. The findings demonstrate the critical co-evolutionary dynamics of experimental governance, transforming existing policy structures over time.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"26 1","pages":"42 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77342175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-09DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2073206
Breana Venneman, Michael Kriechbaum, Thomas Brudermann
ABSTRACT Despite the increasing popularity of the notion of sustainability, there have been global challenges in effectively addressing environmental problems. One of the key strengths of the sustainability concept is its ability to coordinate and unite otherwise contending groups. Because of this bridging function, however, the concept remains necessarily ambiguous, which can obscure existing inconsistencies and tensions and thereby block the successful translation into concrete policy action. In this study, we analyse how environmental sustainability is understood within semi-rural communities in the Canadian province Alberta, which exhibits a heavy economic reliance on fossil fuels and a strong conservative voter base. By carrying out a Q-method study in two characteristic towns, we were able to identify three competing sustainability perspectives: ‘Radical transition towards a post-fossil society’, ‘Maintaining the Albertan way of life’, and ‘Technological innovation and growth’. The study findings emphasize the embeddedness of sustainability framings in the cultural and socioeconomic context. Furthermore, the uncovered perspectives not only reveal conflicting viewpoints, but also areas of consensus as well as points which could be considered as neutral. It is argued that policy action should acknowledge both the place-specific nature as well as the nuance and complexity of environmental discourses to be effective.
{"title":"Act global, think local? Local perspectives towards environmental sustainability in semi-rural communities of Alberta, Canada","authors":"Breana Venneman, Michael Kriechbaum, Thomas Brudermann","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2073206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2073206","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 Despite the increasing popularity of the notion of sustainability, there have been global challenges in effectively addressing environmental problems. One of the key strengths of the sustainability concept is its ability to coordinate and unite otherwise contending groups. Because of this bridging function, however, the concept remains necessarily ambiguous, which can obscure existing inconsistencies and tensions and thereby block the successful translation into concrete policy action. In this study, we analyse how environmental sustainability is understood within semi-rural communities in the Canadian province Alberta, which exhibits a heavy economic reliance on fossil fuels and a strong conservative voter base. By carrying out a Q-method study in two characteristic towns, we were able to identify three competing sustainability perspectives: ‘Radical transition towards a post-fossil society’, ‘Maintaining the Albertan way of life’, and ‘Technological innovation and growth’. The study findings emphasize the embeddedness of sustainability framings in the cultural and socioeconomic context. Furthermore, the uncovered perspectives not only reveal conflicting viewpoints, but also areas of consensus as well as points which could be considered as neutral. It is argued that policy action should acknowledge both the place-specific nature as well as the nuance and complexity of environmental discourses to be effective.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"40 1","pages":"839 - 851"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81377059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-04DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2054787
K. van Assche, M. Duineveld, Monica Gruezmacher, R. Beunen, V. Valentinov
Sustainability transitions bring together many different disciplines focussing on the interrelations between the social and the material. The burgeoning field of transition studies is becoming more inter-disciplinary, less normative, less modernist in nature, and more open to both discursive and material dynamics (e.g. Bosman et al., 2018; Moss et al., 2016). Social-ecological systems thinking, already sensitive to ecological relations and vulnerabilities in their governance thinking, is similarly opening up to other disciplines, and considering the social and discursive with more care and open minds (e.g. Partelow, 2018). In geography and anthropology, a turn to the body, to materiality and to affect preceded these developments, sometimes inspired by Deleuzian theory, sometimes simply through careful observation (e.g. Davidson et al., 2013). Policy studies and planning, meanwhile, have picked up on the need to contribute to transitions and the pathways of sustainable development. The contributions to this special issue explicitly aim to contribute to these inter-disciplinary debates on governance for sustainability. They explore the integration of insights from various disciplines to regain a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of material environments, both natural and humanmade, on the formation and functioning of communities, their cultures, and their governance systems. The collection aims to contribute to this collective re-balancing of theories between discursive and material by highlighting how both connect: in governance, where collectively binding decisions are made to shape, exploit and protect the environment while the wider social issues and governance are simultaneously shaped by its material substrate. Nobody wants a return to material determinism (Marxist or otherwise) which dominated anthropology for a while, nor should we be waiting for a comeback of historicist approaches to landscape design, where the landscape can dictate what is coming next. This Special Issue therefore draws on evolutionary governance theory (EGT) (Van Assche et al., 2013), together with a variety of other perspectives, and puts forward the concept ofmaterial dependencies as a useful way to connect governance, discourse, and environment. Material dependencies are effects of the material world on the functioning of governance, and the legacies they leave (Van Assche et al., 2017). These effects can be direct or indirect, as governance structures, procedures, institutions, and decisions, all of which can be framed, constrained, and enabled by natural and human-made environments and their objects and obstacles. More indirectly, the communities which develop in a particular environment, are shaped in a myriad of ways by that environment, with materially-dependent practices, values and narratives, then seeping into governance systems (Davidson et al., 2013). The key framing paper by the Guest Editors (Van Assche et al., 2022) locates the importance of
可持续转型汇集了许多不同的学科，关注社会和物质之间的相互关系。新兴的转型研究领域正在变得更加跨学科，规范性更少，本质上更少现代主义，对话语和物质动态更开放(例如Bosman等人，2018;Moss et al.， 2016)。社会生态系统思维在其治理思维中已经对生态关系和脆弱性敏感，同样向其他学科开放，并以更谨慎和开放的心态考虑社会和话语(例如Partelow, 2018)。在地理学和人类学中，转向身体、物质性和影响先于这些发展，有时受到德勒兹理论的启发，有时只是通过仔细观察(例如Davidson et al.， 2013)。与此同时，政策研究和规划认识到有必要促进过渡和可持续发展的途径。对本期特刊的贡献明确旨在为这些关于可持续性治理的跨学科辩论做出贡献。他们探索整合不同学科的见解，以重新获得对物质环境(自然和人为)对社区、文化和治理系统的形成和功能的影响的更全面的理解。该作品集旨在通过强调两者之间的联系，促进话语和材料之间理论的集体重新平衡:在治理中，集体做出具有约束力的决定来塑造、利用和保护环境，而更广泛的社会问题和治理同时受到其物质基础的影响。没有人想回到物质决定论(马克思主义或其他)，它曾一度统治过人类学，我们也不应该等待历史主义方法在景观设计中的回归，在那里景观可以决定接下来的事情。因此，本期特刊借鉴了进化治理理论(EGT) (Van Assche et al.， 2013)以及各种其他观点，并提出了物质依赖的概念，将其作为连接治理、话语和环境的有用方法。物质依赖是物质世界对治理功能的影响，以及它们留下的遗产(Van Assche et al.， 2017)。这些影响可以是直接的，也可以是间接的，如治理结构、程序、制度和决策，所有这些都可以被自然和人为的环境及其对象和障碍所框定、约束和启用。更间接的是，在特定环境中发展的社区，由该环境以无数种方式塑造，具有物质依赖的实践，价值观和叙事，然后渗透到治理系统中(Davidson et al.， 2013)。客座编辑(Van Assche et al.， 2022)撰写的关键框架论文指出了实质性对于真正理解可持续性转型的重要性。他们把物质依赖的概念和物质事件的概念联系起来。在物质依赖关系发展之前，需要发生物质事件。环境中发生的事情可以在治理中被观察到(或不被观察到)，它们可以在不被直接观察到的情况下产生影响，这些影响可以是缓慢的、快速的、适度的和破坏性的。对这些影响的观察是不同的，因为它可以为反应奠定基础，而反应反过来又可以成为协调的一部分
{"title":"How can we govern if we don’t see our feet? Speaking of the matter of sustainability transitions","authors":"K. van Assche, M. Duineveld, Monica Gruezmacher, R. Beunen, V. Valentinov","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2054787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2054787","url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability transitions bring together many different disciplines focussing on the interrelations between the social and the material. The burgeoning field of transition studies is becoming more inter-disciplinary, less normative, less modernist in nature, and more open to both discursive and material dynamics (e.g. Bosman et al., 2018; Moss et al., 2016). Social-ecological systems thinking, already sensitive to ecological relations and vulnerabilities in their governance thinking, is similarly opening up to other disciplines, and considering the social and discursive with more care and open minds (e.g. Partelow, 2018). In geography and anthropology, a turn to the body, to materiality and to affect preceded these developments, sometimes inspired by Deleuzian theory, sometimes simply through careful observation (e.g. Davidson et al., 2013). Policy studies and planning, meanwhile, have picked up on the need to contribute to transitions and the pathways of sustainable development. The contributions to this special issue explicitly aim to contribute to these inter-disciplinary debates on governance for sustainability. They explore the integration of insights from various disciplines to regain a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of material environments, both natural and humanmade, on the formation and functioning of communities, their cultures, and their governance systems. The collection aims to contribute to this collective re-balancing of theories between discursive and material by highlighting how both connect: in governance, where collectively binding decisions are made to shape, exploit and protect the environment while the wider social issues and governance are simultaneously shaped by its material substrate. Nobody wants a return to material determinism (Marxist or otherwise) which dominated anthropology for a while, nor should we be waiting for a comeback of historicist approaches to landscape design, where the landscape can dictate what is coming next. This Special Issue therefore draws on evolutionary governance theory (EGT) (Van Assche et al., 2013), together with a variety of other perspectives, and puts forward the concept ofmaterial dependencies as a useful way to connect governance, discourse, and environment. Material dependencies are effects of the material world on the functioning of governance, and the legacies they leave (Van Assche et al., 2017). These effects can be direct or indirect, as governance structures, procedures, institutions, and decisions, all of which can be framed, constrained, and enabled by natural and human-made environments and their objects and obstacles. More indirectly, the communities which develop in a particular environment, are shaped in a myriad of ways by that environment, with materially-dependent practices, values and narratives, then seeping into governance systems (Davidson et al., 2013). The key framing paper by the Guest Editors (Van Assche et al., 2022) locates the importance of","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"12 1","pages":"277 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87749549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-04DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2022.2047620
L. C. Kluger, A. Schlüter, M. Garteizgogeascoa, G. Damonte
ABSTRACT This paper looks at the institutional emergence, particularly space rights, within the culture of the Peruvian bay scallop (Argopecten purpuratus) in Sechura Bay. The institutional system developed within a period of 20 years from an open-access, gold rush scenario to a rather structured, formal activity – however, still relies on a lot of informality. This work uses the matrix provided by the material dependency framework presented in this special issue distinguishing between nature, human and hybrid-made materialities that influence the emergence of institutional structures, on the one axis and path-, inter- and goal dependencies on the other axis. In this work, we argue that existing natural (high environmental risks associated with scallop culture in this setting), hybrid (need to process quickly) and human-made (export-oriented production) materialities have shaped different path dependencies in institutional development in favour of larger firms who gradually took over the control of scallop production from small-scale producers, who in turn became piece wage labourers. Yet, the realities of both actors are necessarily intertwined, with informal loop holes being intentionally left open, shaping different institutional solutions over time. Applying the material dependency framework shows how materialities and goal dependencies are intertwined in this particular case of scallop bottom aquaculture.
{"title":"Materialities, discourses and governance: scallop culture in Sechura, Peru","authors":"L. C. Kluger, A. Schlüter, M. Garteizgogeascoa, G. Damonte","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2047620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2047620","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper looks at the institutional emergence, particularly space rights, within the culture of the Peruvian bay scallop (Argopecten purpuratus) in Sechura Bay. The institutional system developed within a period of 20 years from an open-access, gold rush scenario to a rather structured, formal activity – however, still relies on a lot of informality. This work uses the matrix provided by the material dependency framework presented in this special issue distinguishing between nature, human and hybrid-made materialities that influence the emergence of institutional structures, on the one axis and path-, inter- and goal dependencies on the other axis. In this work, we argue that existing natural (high environmental risks associated with scallop culture in this setting), hybrid (need to process quickly) and human-made (export-oriented production) materialities have shaped different path dependencies in institutional development in favour of larger firms who gradually took over the control of scallop production from small-scale producers, who in turn became piece wage labourers. Yet, the realities of both actors are necessarily intertwined, with informal loop holes being intentionally left open, shaping different institutional solutions over time. Applying the material dependency framework shows how materialities and goal dependencies are intertwined in this particular case of scallop bottom aquaculture.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"15 1","pages":"309 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73473866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：