首页 > 最新文献

Journal of personality assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) Across New Zealand Māori and European Samples. 精神病检查表的测量不变性和收敛效度:筛选版(PCL:SV)在新西兰Māori和欧洲样本。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2460992
Ryan Botha, Devon L L Polaschek, Nick Wilson

The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; Hart et al., 1995) in a sample of 514 male offenders in New Zealand; 333 identifying as Māori and 181 as NZ European. Correlational analysis showed convergent validity between PCL:SV Total, Factor and Facet scores and subscales of two dynamic item-based instruments used to monitor and manage people in prison or post-custody, although these relationships were stronger among NZ European compared to Māori men. Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analyses (MGCFA) supported the 3-factor model of PCL psychopathy which demonstrated partial scalar invariance of PCL:SV scores across Māori and NZ European cohorts. These findings indicate that application of the PCL:SV, in line with the three-factor model, is empirically and clinically defensible practice with both Māori and NZ European clients under correctional care.

本研究检验了《哈尔精神病检查表:筛选版》(PCL:SV;Hart et al., 1995)在新西兰514名男性罪犯的样本中;333标识为Māori, 181标识为新西兰欧洲。相关分析显示PCL:SV Total, Factor和Facet得分以及用于监控和管理监狱或拘留后人员的两种动态项目工具的子量表之间的收敛效度,尽管与Māori男性相比,这些关系在新西兰欧洲人中更强。多组验证性因子分析(MGCFA)支持PCL精神病的三因素模型,该模型证明了Māori和新西兰欧洲队列中PCL:SV评分的部分标量不变性。这些研究结果表明,PCL:SV的应用,符合三因素模型,是经验和临床可辩护的做法,Māori和新西兰欧洲客户在矫正护理。
{"title":"Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) Across New Zealand Māori and European Samples.","authors":"Ryan Botha, Devon L L Polaschek, Nick Wilson","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2460992","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2460992","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; Hart et al., 1995) in a sample of 514 male offenders in New Zealand; 333 identifying as Māori and 181 as NZ European. Correlational analysis showed convergent validity between PCL:SV Total, Factor and Facet scores and subscales of two dynamic item-based instruments used to monitor and manage people in prison or post-custody, although these relationships were stronger among NZ European compared to Māori men. Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analyses (MGCFA) supported the 3-factor model of PCL psychopathy which demonstrated partial scalar invariance of PCL:SV scores across Māori and NZ European cohorts. These findings indicate that application of the PCL:SV, in line with the three-factor model, is empirically and clinically defensible practice with both Māori and NZ European clients under correctional care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"439-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Further Validation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) in Chinese Adolescents. 在中国青少年中进一步验证勇气量表(TMGS)的三元模型。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430318
Jie Gong, Dong-Li Bei, Dai-Li Pi, Jie Luo

The Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) was developed as an innovative measurement designed to evaluate general grit levels, encompassing perseverance of effort, consistency of interests, and adaptability to situations within a collectivism culture. The present study was undertaken with the aim of examining the factor structure, measurement invariance, empirical validity, and incremental validity of the TMGS among in a sample of Chinese adolescents (N = 997, 43.4% males, Mage = 16.64, SDage = 1.05). The results revealed that the original three-factor model of TMGS exhibited the best fit to the data, and supported partial scalar invariance across gender. Additionally, the internal consistency values of the TMGS scores ranged from marginal to acceptable, and the stability coefficients across time were acceptable. Moreover, the TMGS scores showed satisfactory criterion-related validity, correlating with scores of external criteria variables (e.g., Grit-S, self-control, and big five personality). Finally, the TMGS scores demonstrated superior incremental validity in predicting academic burnout compared to conscientiousness. Overall, although further studies are needed, our findings suggested that the TMGS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties within a collectivist culture and may serve as a promising tool for assessing grit levels in Chinese adolescents.

勇气三元模型量表(TMGS)是一种创新的测量方法,旨在评估一般勇气水平,包括在集体主义文化中的努力毅力、兴趣一致性和对情境的适应性。本研究以中国青少年(人数=997,男性占43.4%,年龄=16.64,平均年龄=1.05)为样本,考察了TMGS的因子结构、测量不变性、经验效度和递增效度。结果显示,TMGS 的原始三因素模型与数据的拟合度最高,并支持跨性别的部分标度不变性。此外,TMGS 分数的内部一致性值从微不足道到可以接受,跨时间的稳定性系数也可以接受。此外,TMGS 分数与外部标准变量(如 Grit-S、自我控制和五大人格)的分数相关,显示出令人满意的标准相关有效性。最后,与自觉性相比,TMGS 分数在预测学业倦怠方面表现出更高的增量效度。总之,尽管还需要进一步的研究,但我们的研究结果表明,TMGS在集体主义文化中表现出了可接受的心理测量特性,可以作为评估中国青少年勇气水平的一种有前途的工具。
{"title":"Further Validation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) in Chinese Adolescents.","authors":"Jie Gong, Dong-Li Bei, Dai-Li Pi, Jie Luo","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2430318","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2430318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) was developed as an innovative measurement designed to evaluate general grit levels, encompassing perseverance of effort, consistency of interests, and adaptability to situations within a collectivism culture. The present study was undertaken with the aim of examining the factor structure, measurement invariance, empirical validity, and incremental validity of the TMGS among in a sample of Chinese adolescents (<i>N</i> = 997, 43.4% males, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 16.64, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 1.05). The results revealed that the original three-factor model of TMGS exhibited the best fit to the data, and supported partial scalar invariance across gender. Additionally, the internal consistency values of the TMGS scores ranged from marginal to acceptable, and the stability coefficients across time were acceptable. Moreover, the TMGS scores showed satisfactory criterion-related validity, correlating with scores of external criteria variables (e.g., Grit-S, self-control, and big five personality). Finally, the TMGS scores demonstrated superior incremental validity in predicting academic burnout compared to conscientiousness. Overall, although further studies are needed, our findings suggested that the TMGS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties within a collectivist culture and may serve as a promising tool for assessing grit levels in Chinese adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"507-515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting. CAT-PD和MMPI-3效度量表检测模拟的多报和少报。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315
Omeed Tartak, Leah T Emery, Leonard J Simms

Individuals can sway legal, medical, employment, or other decisions by dishonestly self-reporting on psychological tests. Accordingly, the Comprehensive Assessment of Traits relevant to Personality Disorder (CAT-PD) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) include validity scales to detect overreporting and underreporting. Although many studies have empirically tested the validity scales of the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF, fewer have done so with the updated MMPI-3, and none with the CAT-PD. Therefore, in the present study, a simulation design was conducted to determine how successfully the CAT-PD and MMPI-3 validity scales would discriminate between credible responders and noncredible responders (i.e., overreporters and underreporters). Undergraduates and crowd-sourced adults (Total N = 484) were randomly assigned to respond honestly, overreport, or underreport while completing the MMPI-3 and the CAT-PD. Relative to honest responders, overreporters and underreporters significantly increased their respective validity scale scores (Cohen's d range = 1.04 - d = 4.87); they also significantly biased their substantive scale profiles. Moreover, CAT-PD validity scales demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity with MMPI-3 validity scales and similar classification accuracy estimates via receiver operating characteristic curves. These results suggest that, within a nonclinical simulation design, CAT-PD and MMPI-3 validity scales both effectively detect noncredible responding.

个人可以通过在心理测试中不诚实的自我报告来影响法律、医疗、就业或其他决定。因此,《人格障碍相关特征综合评估》(CAT-PD)和《明尼苏达多相人格量表-3》(MMPI-3)都包含了效度量表来检测多报和少报。尽管许多研究已经对MMPI-2和MMPI-2- rf的有效性量表进行了实证测试,但很少有研究对更新的MMPI-3进行了测试,而对CAT-PD则没有进行测试。因此,在本研究中,进行了模拟设计,以确定CAT-PD和MMPI-3效度量表在区分可信应答者和不可信应答者(即报告过多和报告不足)方面的成功程度。在完成MMPI-3和CAT-PD时,本科生和人群来源的成年人(总N = 484)被随机分配如实回答、多报或少报。相对于诚实应答者,过度报告者和少报告者各自的效度量表得分显著提高(Cohen’s d = 1.04 - d = 4.87);他们也明显偏向于他们的实质性量表。此外,CAT-PD效度量表与MMPI-3效度量表和相似的分类精度估计通过受试者工作特征曲线显示收敛和判别效度。这些结果表明,在非临床模拟设计中,CAT-PD和MMPI-3效度量表都能有效地检测出不可信的反应。
{"title":"CAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting.","authors":"Omeed Tartak, Leah T Emery, Leonard J Simms","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals can sway legal, medical, employment, or other decisions by dishonestly self-reporting on psychological tests. Accordingly, the Comprehensive Assessment of Traits relevant to Personality Disorder (CAT-PD) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) include validity scales to detect overreporting and underreporting. Although many studies have empirically tested the validity scales of the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF, fewer have done so with the updated MMPI-3, and none with the CAT-PD. Therefore, in the present study, a simulation design was conducted to determine how successfully the CAT-PD and MMPI-3 validity scales would discriminate between credible responders and noncredible responders (i.e., overreporters and underreporters). Undergraduates and crowd-sourced adults (Total <i>N</i> = 484) were randomly assigned to respond honestly, overreport, or underreport while completing the MMPI-3 and the CAT-PD. Relative to honest responders, overreporters and underreporters significantly increased their respective validity scale scores (Cohen's <i>d</i> range = 1.04 - <i>d</i> = 4.87); they also significantly biased their substantive scale profiles. Moreover, CAT-PD validity scales demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity with MMPI-3 validity scales and similar classification accuracy estimates <i>via</i> receiver operating characteristic curves. These results suggest that, within a nonclinical simulation design, CAT-PD and MMPI-3 validity scales both effectively detect noncredible responding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"530-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146425/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation of the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire. 未来自我连续性问卷的综合心理测量评估。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2443412
Lei Han, Richard J Siegert, Wendy Wrapson

Future self-continuity is the relationship between an individual's perception of their present and future selves and is attracting intense interest from researchers in psychology and health. This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ), a tool designed to measure an individual's future self-continuity, in New Zealand's unique sociocultural context. In Phase 1 we tested the reliability (internal consistency) of the 10 item FSCQ and its three subscales and attempted to replicate the three-factor structure reported previously. In Phase 2 we examined the FSCQ's correlations with established measures like the Future Self-Continuity Scale (FSCS), Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC-14) Scale, Multidimensional Temporal Self-Continuity Scale (MTSCS), and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). Results from the first phase confirmed the FSCQ's reliability and construct validity, with strong internal consistency (α ranged from .77 to .87) and a good factorial structure (GFI=.97, RMSEA=.04). In the second phase, the FSCQ demonstrated positive correlations with the FSCS, CFC-14, and MTSCS, and negative correlations with the BHS. These findings suggest that the FSCQ reliably measures FSC, has a robust replicable three-factor structure and is consistent with other relevant psychological constructs. This study demonstrates the applicability of the FSCQ outside the United States for the first time.

未来自我连续性是个体对现在和未来自我的感知之间的关系,引起了心理学和健康研究人员的强烈兴趣。本研究旨在心理测量学评估未来自我连续性问卷(FSCQ),这是一种旨在衡量个人未来自我连续性的工具,在新西兰独特的社会文化背景下。在第一阶段,我们测试了10项FSCQ及其三个子量表的信度(内部一致性),并试图复制之前报道的三因素结构。在第二阶段,我们研究了FSCQ与既定测量方法的相关性,如未来自我连续性量表(FSCS)、考虑未来后果量表(CFC-14)、多维时间自我连续性量表(MTSCS)和贝克绝望量表(BHS)。第一阶段的结果证实了FSCQ的信度和结构效度,具有较强的内部一致性(α范围为0.77 ~ 0.87)和良好的析因结构(GFI=)。97年,RMSEA = .04点)。在第二阶段,FSCQ与FSCS、CFC-14和MTSCS呈正相关,与BHS呈负相关。这些研究结果表明,FSCQ能够可靠地测量FSC,具有稳健的可复制的三因素结构,并且与其他相关的心理构念一致。本研究首次证明了FSCQ在美国以外地区的适用性。
{"title":"A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation of the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire.","authors":"Lei Han, Richard J Siegert, Wendy Wrapson","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2443412","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2443412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Future self-continuity is the relationship between an individual's perception of their present and future selves and is attracting intense interest from researchers in psychology and health. This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ), a tool designed to measure an individual's future self-continuity, in New Zealand's unique sociocultural context. In Phase 1 we tested the reliability (internal consistency) of the 10 item FSCQ and its three subscales and attempted to replicate the three-factor structure reported previously. In Phase 2 we examined the FSCQ's correlations with established measures like the Future Self-Continuity Scale (FSCS), Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC-14) Scale, Multidimensional Temporal Self-Continuity Scale (MTSCS), and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). Results from the first phase confirmed the FSCQ's reliability and construct validity, with strong internal consistency (α ranged from .77 to .87) and a good factorial structure (GFI=.97, RMSEA=.04). In the second phase, the FSCQ demonstrated positive correlations with the FSCS, CFC-14, and MTSCS, and negative correlations with the BHS. These findings suggest that the FSCQ reliably measures FSC, has a robust replicable three-factor structure and is consistent with other relevant psychological constructs. This study demonstrates the applicability of the FSCQ outside the United States for the first time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"496-506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction. 修正。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2476336
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2476336","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2476336","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"542-543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143605250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Considerations When Determining Similarity Between Traits and Skills: Raters and Item Types. 决定特质和技能相似性的考虑因素:评分者和物品类型。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2444447
Kate E Walton, Dana Murano, Jeremy Burrus

Recent research has examined similarities and differences between traits and skills. It may be the case that traits and skills can be measured interchangeably with one providing little to no incremental validity over the other. However, methodological limitations constrain our ability to draw firm conclusions. Work in this area thus far has only examined self-reports and single-stimulus Likert items. We carried out two studies to try to determine the extent to which methodology influences observed trait-skill similarity. In Study 1, we collected both self- and observer-reports of traits and skills, and in Study 2, we used both Likert and forced choice items. We examined whether trait-skill similarity in scores and validity evidence varied according to rater and item type. Our findings suggest that trait-skill similarity is unaffected by rater but is affected by item type; forced choice items lend themselves to greater trait-skill similarity.

最近的研究调查了特质和技能之间的异同。可能的情况是,特征和技能可以互换测量,其中一个几乎没有比另一个提供增量有效性。然而,方法上的限制限制了我们得出确切结论的能力。到目前为止,这一领域的工作只研究了自我报告和单刺激李克特项目。我们进行了两项研究,试图确定方法论对观察到的特质-技能相似性的影响程度。在研究1中,我们收集了自我和观察者对特质和技能的报告,在研究2中,我们同时使用了李克特和强制选择项目。我们考察了评分者和项目类型的不同,在得分和效度证据上的特质-技能相似性是否有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,特质-技能相似性不受比率的影响,但受项目类型的影响;强迫选择项目使它们自身具有更大的特征技能相似性。
{"title":"Considerations When Determining Similarity Between Traits and Skills: Raters and Item Types.","authors":"Kate E Walton, Dana Murano, Jeremy Burrus","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2444447","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2444447","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has examined similarities and differences between traits and skills. It may be the case that traits and skills can be measured interchangeably with one providing little to no incremental validity over the other. However, methodological limitations constrain our ability to draw firm conclusions. Work in this area thus far has only examined self-reports and single-stimulus Likert items. We carried out two studies to try to determine the extent to which methodology influences observed trait-skill similarity. In Study 1, we collected both self- and observer-reports of traits and skills, and in Study 2, we used both Likert and forced choice items. We examined whether trait-skill similarity in scores and validity evidence varied according to rater and item type. Our findings suggest that trait-skill similarity is unaffected by rater but is affected by item type; forced choice items lend themselves to greater trait-skill similarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"426-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142915252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Some Satisfying and Frustrating Findings. 基本心理需求满足与挫折量表:一些令人满意和令人沮丧的发现。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2444460
Ronald R Holden, Erika L Peter, Madeleine T D'Agata, Brenda Brooks

As a tool for operationalizing basic psychological needs theory (an aspect of self-determination theory), the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) has become the primary self-report measure. Here, with a sample of 807 Canadian military members, we confirm the BPNSFS six content factor structure and, in supporting that structure, demonstrate the differential association of satisfaction and frustration scales with psychological functioning variables that are external to the factor analysis. Although the specific content interpretation of the BPNSFS can be debated, we support the continued use of the BPNSFS as a psychometrically sound instrument.

作为基本心理需求理论(自我决定理论的一个方面)的操作工具,基本心理需求满意度和挫折感量表(BPNSFS)已成为主要的自我报告测量方法。在此,我们以 807 名加拿大军人为样本,确认了 BPNSFS 的六内容因子结构,并在支持该结构的同时,证明了满意度和挫折感量表与心理功能变量的不同关联,而这些变量是因子分析的外部变量。尽管对 BPNSFS 的具体内容解释还存在争议,但我们支持继续使用 BPNSFS,将其作为一种心理计量学上可靠的工具。
{"title":"The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Some Satisfying and Frustrating Findings.","authors":"Ronald R Holden, Erika L Peter, Madeleine T D'Agata, Brenda Brooks","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2444460","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2444460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a tool for operationalizing basic psychological needs theory (an aspect of self-determination theory), the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) has become the primary self-report measure. Here, with a sample of 807 Canadian military members, we confirm the BPNSFS six content factor structure and, in supporting that structure, demonstrate the differential association of satisfaction and frustration scales with psychological functioning variables that are external to the factor analysis. Although the specific content interpretation of the BPNSFS can be debated, we support the continued use of the BPNSFS as a psychometrically sound instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Tend-and-Befriend Questionnaire. 亲友问卷的心理测量学评估
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2413148
Jessica K Hlay, Benjamin N Johnson, Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon, Kenneth N Levy

In response to Cannon's widely accepted fight-or-flight system, Taylor et al. proposed the tend-and-befriend hypothesis to better capture variance in women's stress response behaviors. The Tend-and-Befriend Questionnaire (TBQ) measures self-reported individual differences in the use of fight, flight, tend, and befriend. Several studies have used this scale to evaluate sex differences in these behaviors, yet it has not yet been rigorously evaluated. Using three samples (N = 1094), we first explore the factor structure of the TBQ to produce and validate a revised measure, the TBQ-Short Form (TBQ-SF). Next, we evaluate the claim that women use tend-and-befriend more than men. Results indicated that the TBQ-SF provided both reliable subscales and largely acceptable model fit, yet the factor structure and validity varied across the three samples. While men do report more fighting than women, both men and women report use tending and befriending more than fighting or fleeing. Finally, other variables-namely attachment-capture more variance in TBQ-SF factors than sex. While the TBQ-SF does capture differences in stress reactions (fight, flight, tend/befriend), we suggest that the scale is most reliable in measuring overall stress reactivity. Therefore, future research should aim to construct a better scale specific to tend-and-befriend using alternative methodologies.

针对 Cannon 广为接受的 "战斗或逃跑 "系统,Taylor 等人提出了 "倾向和友谊 "假说,以更好地捕捉女性压力反应行为中的差异。趋向和结交问卷(TBQ)测量的是在使用战斗、逃跑、趋向和结交时自我报告的个体差异。已有多项研究使用该量表来评估这些行为的性别差异,但尚未对其进行严格评估。通过使用三个样本(样本数 = 1094),我们首先探究了 TBQ 的因子结构,制作并验证了修订后的量表 TBQ-简表(TBQ-SF)。接下来,我们对女性比男性更多使用 "招标交友 "这一说法进行了评估。结果表明,TBQ-SF 提供了可靠的子量表和基本可接受的模型拟合度,但三个样本的因子结构和有效性各不相同。虽然男性报告的打架次数多于女性,但男性和女性报告的照顾和结交次数都多于打架或逃离次数。最后,其他变量--即依恋--比性别更能捕捉 TBQ-SF 因子中的变异。虽然 TBQ-SF 确实捕捉到了压力反应(战斗、逃跑、照料/结交)的差异,但我们认为该量表在测量整体压力反应方面最为可靠。因此,未来的研究应着眼于使用其他方法构建一个更好的、专门针对趋向和结交的量表。
{"title":"A Psychometric Evaluation of the Tend-and-Befriend Questionnaire.","authors":"Jessica K Hlay, Benjamin N Johnson, Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon, Kenneth N Levy","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2413148","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2413148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to Cannon's widely accepted fight-or-flight system, Taylor et al. proposed the tend-and-befriend hypothesis to better capture variance in women's stress response behaviors. The Tend-and-Befriend Questionnaire (TBQ) measures self-reported individual differences in the use of fight, flight, tend, and befriend. Several studies have used this scale to evaluate sex differences in these behaviors, yet it has not yet been rigorously evaluated. Using three samples (<i>N</i> = 1094), we first explore the factor structure of the TBQ to produce and validate a revised measure, the TBQ-Short Form (TBQ-SF). Next, we evaluate the claim that women use tend-and-befriend more than men. Results indicated that the TBQ-SF provided both reliable subscales and largely acceptable model fit, yet the factor structure and validity varied across the three samples. While men do report more fighting than women, <i>both</i> men and women report use tending and befriending more than fighting or fleeing. Finally, other variables-namely attachment-capture more variance in TBQ-SF factors than sex. While the TBQ-SF does capture differences in stress reactions (fight, flight, tend/befriend), we suggest that the scale is most reliable in measuring overall stress reactivity. Therefore, future research should aim to construct a better scale specific to tend-and-befriend using alternative methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"346-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified. 针对 DSM-5 的 ICD-11 兼容人格量表波斯语版本的验证--简表增强版(修订版)》(Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified)。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872
Saeid Komasi, Andre Kerber, Christopher J Hopwood

Clinical assessment increasingly emphasizes six maladaptive domains of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait models, including negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, psychoticism, and anankastia. The present study aimed to validate the Persian version of the ICD-11 compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form Plus, Modified (PID5BF + M). Data from a mixed sample including 1,615 adults (community N = 1,476 and outpatient N = 139) were used to assess the latent structure, congruence coefficients, reliability, convergent validity, and criterion validity of the PID5BF + M. The results supported the six-factor structure of the PID5BF + M whose traits are largely congruent with those from previous studies. The scale reliabilities were acceptable, and strong associations were observed with personality disorder-type symptom counts (r ranging from .15 to .59, all p < .001). PID5BF + M scales also distinguished clinical and non-clinical samples. The present results support the validity and utility of the PID5BF + M for personality psychopathology screening in the Iranian population.

临床评估越来越强调 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 特质模型中的六个适应不良领域,包括负性情感、疏离、对抗/不合群、抑制、精神病性和厌世。本研究旨在验证与 ICD-11 兼容的波斯语版《DSM-5 人格量表--简表+,修订版》(PID5BF + M)。研究采用了包括 1,615 名成人(社区 N = 1,476 人,门诊 N = 139 人)在内的混合样本数据,以评估 PID5BF + M 的潜在结构、一致性系数、可靠性、收敛效度和标准效度。结果支持 PID5BF + M 的六因素结构,其特质与以往研究的特质基本一致。量表的信度是可以接受的,并且观察到与人格障碍类症状计数有很强的关联(r 范围在 0.15 到 0.59 之间,所有 p < 0.001)。PID5BF + M量表还能区分临床和非临床样本。本研究结果支持 PID5BF + M 在伊朗人群中进行人格心理病理学筛查的有效性和实用性。
{"title":"Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified.","authors":"Saeid Komasi, Andre Kerber, Christopher J Hopwood","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical assessment increasingly emphasizes six maladaptive domains of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait models, including negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, psychoticism, and anankastia. The present study aimed to validate the Persian version of the ICD-11 compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form Plus, Modified (PID5BF + M). Data from a mixed sample including 1,615 adults (community <i>N</i> = 1,476 and outpatient <i>N</i> = 139) were used to assess the latent structure, congruence coefficients, reliability, convergent validity, and criterion validity of the PID5BF + M. The results supported the six-factor structure of the PID5BF + M whose traits are largely congruent with those from previous studies. The scale reliabilities were acceptable, and strong associations were observed with personality disorder-type symptom counts (<i>r</i> ranging from .15 to .59, all <i>p</i> < .001). PID5BF + M scales also distinguished clinical and non-clinical samples. The present results support the validity and utility of the PID5BF + M for personality psychopathology screening in the Iranian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"306-316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving Toward an Online Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): The Impact of Administration Modifications on Narrative Length and Story Richness. 向在线主题感知测验(TAT)迈进:管理修改对叙述长度和故事丰富度的影响。
IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2425660
Jenelle M Slavin-Mulford, Elyse M Vincent, Savanna G Coleman, Havilah P Ravula, Jeremy J Coleman, Melanie M Wilcox, Michelle B Stein

The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is the second most commonly used performance-based task. However, traditional TAT administration is time-consuming and raises accessibility issues. Research exploring administration modifications has found that within a lab setting, having participants type their own narratives leads to richer responses than when participants narrate the stories out loud to an examiner. The current study extends prior research by investigating the impact of card presentation (hard copy versus computer screen) and setting (in the lab versus online) on narrative quality. A four-card TAT protocol was administered to 134 college students in three separate conditions: in lab with hard copies of cards, in lab with images on the computer, and online in which participants could take the TAT wherever they wished. In all conditions, participants typed their narratives. The narratives were scored using the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale- Global Rating Method (SCORS-G). MANOVA procedures showed that SCORS-G ratings were not affected by card presentation or setting and add to prior work to suggest that the TAT can be administered online without a diminution in the quality of SCORS-G ratings at least with some populations.

主题感知测验(TAT)是第二种最常用的基于表现的任务。然而,传统的 TAT 施测既耗时,又存在无障碍问题。研究人员对施测方法的改进进行了探索,发现在实验室环境中,让受试者自己打字叙述故事比受试者大声向考官叙述故事能得到更丰富的回答。本研究通过调查卡片呈现方式(硬拷贝与电脑屏幕)和环境(实验室与网络)对叙述质量的影响,对之前的研究进行了扩展。研究人员在三种不同的条件下对 134 名大学生进行了四张卡片的 TAT 测试:在实验室中使用硬拷贝卡片,在实验室中使用电脑屏幕上的图像,以及在线测试(参与者可以在任何地方进行 TAT 测试)。在所有条件下,参与者都要打字叙述。叙述内容采用社会认知与客体关系量表-总体评分法(SCORS-G)进行评分。MANOVA 程序显示,SCORS-G 评级不受卡片展示或环境的影响,这也补充了之前的研究,表明 TAT 可以在线进行,至少在某些人群中不会降低 SCORS-G 评级的质量。
{"title":"Moving Toward an Online Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): The Impact of Administration Modifications on Narrative Length and Story Richness.","authors":"Jenelle M Slavin-Mulford, Elyse M Vincent, Savanna G Coleman, Havilah P Ravula, Jeremy J Coleman, Melanie M Wilcox, Michelle B Stein","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2425660","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2425660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is the second most commonly used performance-based task. However, traditional TAT administration is time-consuming and raises accessibility issues. Research exploring administration modifications has found that within a lab setting, having participants type their own narratives leads to richer responses than when participants narrate the stories out loud to an examiner. The current study extends prior research by investigating the impact of card presentation (hard copy versus computer screen) and setting (in the lab versus online) on narrative quality. A four-card TAT protocol was administered to 134 college students in three separate conditions: in lab with hard copies of cards, in lab with images on the computer, and online in which participants could take the TAT wherever they wished. In all conditions, participants typed their narratives. The narratives were scored using the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale- Global Rating Method (SCORS-G). MANOVA procedures showed that SCORS-G ratings were not affected by card presentation or setting and add to prior work to suggest that the TAT can be administered online without a diminution in the quality of SCORS-G ratings at least with some populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"374-383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of personality assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1