首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association最新文献

英文 中文
Disparities in Spatial Access to Sleep Health Care in the United States: A Population-Based Geospatial Analysis 美国睡眠保健服务的空间差异:基于人口的地理空间分析》。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105274

Objectives

To examine spatial access to sleep health care in the United States and investigate associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, thereby identifying high-risk communities with limited spatial access to sleep health service.

Design

A cross-sectional population-based geospatial analysis.

Settings and Participants

Residents in US Census tracts across the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, and Hawaii.

Methods

The 2020 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2010 rural-urban commuting area codes, 2020 Area Deprivation Index, and sleep care provider locations from the National Provider Identifier file were used to assess the spatial access and related demographic/socioeconomic characteristics. Spatial access was measured by spatial access ratio using enhanced 2-step floating catchment area methods. The associations were investigated using logistic regression analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results

A total of 45.8 million residents experienced low spatial access to sleep health care. Spatial access decreased in rural and high Area Deprivation Index areas, and in areas characterized by higher population with uninsured status, vehicle unavailability, internet unavailability, cognitive difficulties, and hearing difficulties. With a 10% increase in the percentage of the racial minority (non-white) population, metropolitan census tracts experienced an increase in spatial access (3.268%), whereas micropolitan (−1.526%) and rural (−4.493%) areas experienced a decrease in spatial access. Similar findings were observed within the ethnic minority (Hispanic or Latino) population.

Conclusions and Implications

Disparities exist in spatial access to sleep health care across the United States, especially for disadvantaged individuals. Racial/ethnic minorities exhibit contrasting spatial access patterns in urban and rural areas, with those in rural areas facing more challenges in spatial access to sleep health care.
目的:研究美国睡眠保健服务的空间获取情况,并调查其与人口和社会经济特征之间的关联:研究美国睡眠保健的空间获取情况,并调查与人口和社会经济特征的关联,从而确定睡眠保健服务空间获取有限的高风险社区:设计:基于人口的横截面地理空间分析:设置和参与者:美国 48 个毗连州、阿拉斯加州和夏威夷州人口普查区的居民:方法:利用 2020 年美国社区调查 5 年估计数据、2010 年城乡通勤地区代码、2020 年地区贫困指数以及全国提供者识别码文件中的睡眠护理提供者位置来评估空间访问和相关人口/社会经济特征。使用增强型两步浮动集水区方法,以空间获取率来衡量空间获取情况。使用逻辑回归分析和多变量线性回归分析对相关性进行了研究:结果:共有 4580 万居民的睡眠保健空间可及性较低。在农村和地区贫困指数较高的地区,以及无保险、无车、无网络、认知困难和听力困难的人口较多的地区,空间获得性有所下降。随着少数种族(非白人)人口比例增加 10%,大都市人口普查区的空间通达性增加了(3.268%),而大都市(-1.526%)和农村(-4.493%)地区的空间通达性则下降了。在少数民族(西班牙裔或拉丁裔)人口中也观察到了类似的结果:美国各地在获得睡眠保健服务的空间上存在差异,尤其是对弱势人群而言。少数种族/族裔在城市和农村地区表现出截然不同的空间获取模式,农村地区的少数种族/族裔在睡眠保健的空间获取方面面临更多挑战。
{"title":"Disparities in Spatial Access to Sleep Health Care in the United States: A Population-Based Geospatial Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105274","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105274","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine spatial access to sleep health care in the United States and investigate associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, thereby identifying high-risk communities with limited spatial access to sleep health service.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional population-based geospatial analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Settings and Participants</h3><div>Residents in US Census tracts across the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, and Hawaii.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2020 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2010 rural-urban commuting area codes, 2020 Area Deprivation Index, and sleep care provider locations from the National Provider Identifier file were used to assess the spatial access and related demographic/socioeconomic characteristics. Spatial access was measured by spatial access ratio using enhanced 2-step floating catchment area methods. The associations were investigated using logistic regression analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 45.8 million residents experienced low spatial access to sleep health care. Spatial access decreased in rural and high Area Deprivation Index areas, and in areas characterized by higher population with uninsured status, vehicle unavailability, internet unavailability, cognitive difficulties, and hearing difficulties. With a 10% increase in the percentage of the racial minority (non-white) population, metropolitan census tracts experienced an increase in spatial access (3.268%), whereas micropolitan (−1.526%) and rural (−4.493%) areas experienced a decrease in spatial access. Similar findings were observed within the ethnic minority (Hispanic or Latino) population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Disparities exist in spatial access to sleep health care across the United States, especially for disadvantaged individuals. Racial/ethnic minorities exhibit contrasting spatial access patterns in urban and rural areas, with those in rural areas facing more challenges in spatial access to sleep health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Frailty and Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults. 老年人的社会脆弱性和认知障碍。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105282
Tomoyuki Kawada
{"title":"Social Frailty and Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.","authors":"Tomoyuki Kawada","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105282","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105282","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics of New Residents of Assisted Living: A Nested Case-Control Study 辅助生活设施新住户的临床和社会人口特征:一项嵌套病例对照研究。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105270

Objective

To examine transitions to an assisted living facility among community-dwelling older adults who received publicly funded home care services.

Design

Nested case-control study.

Setting and Participants

Linked, population-level health system administrative data were obtained from adults aged 65 years and older who received home care services in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. New residents of assisted living were matched on age, sex, and initiation date of home care (± 7 days) to community-dwelling home care recipients in a 1:4 ratio.

Methods

Clinical and functional status, health service use, sociodemographic variables, and community-level characteristics were examined; conditional logistic regression was used to model associations with a transition to an assisted living facility.

Results

There were 2427 new residents of assisted living who were matched to 9708 home care recipients [mean (SD) age 85.5 (6.02) years, 72% female]. Most of the new residents were concentrated in urban communities and communities with higher income quintiles. New residents had an increased rate of physician-diagnosed dementia [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14–1.43], mood disorders (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05–1.29), and cardiac arrhythmias (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32). They also had higher rates of mild cognitive impairment (aHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.24–1.66), 2 or more falls (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.51), participation in activities of long-standing interest in the past 7 days (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.50), and a lower rate of a spouse or partner unpaid caregiver vs a child (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56–0.79).

Conclusions and Implications

New residents of assisted living were mostly women, were cognitively impaired, had clinical comorbidities that could increase their risk of injuries, and had caregivers who were their children. These findings stress the importance of upscaling memory and dementia care in assisted living to address the needs of this population.
目的研究接受政府资助的家庭护理服务的社区老年人向生活辅助设施的过渡:设计:嵌套病例对照研究:从 2018 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间,从加拿大安大略省接受家庭护理服务的 65 岁及以上成年人处获得了关联的人口级卫生系统行政数据。根据年龄、性别和开始接受家庭护理的日期(± 7 天),将辅助生活的新居民与社区居住的家庭护理接受者按 1:4 的比例进行匹配:对临床和功能状态、医疗服务使用情况、社会人口学变量和社区层面的特征进行了研究;使用条件逻辑回归建立了过渡到辅助生活设施的关联模型:共有 2427 名新入住辅助生活设施的居民,他们与 9708 名家庭护理对象(平均 [SD] 年龄为 85.5 [6.02] 岁,72% 为女性)进行了配对。大多数新居民集中在城市社区和收入较高的社区。新居民经医生诊断患有痴呆症(调整后危险比 [aHR],1.28;95% CI,1.14-1.43)、情绪障碍(aHR,1.17;95% CI,1.05-1.29)和心律失常(aHR,1.19;95% CI,1.07-1.32)的比例较高。他们患有轻度认知障碍(aHR,1.43;95% CI,1.24-1.66)、2 次或以上跌倒(aHR,1.29;95% CI,1.11-1.51)、过去 7 天内参加长期感兴趣的活动(aHR,1.29;95% CI,1.11-1.50)的比例也较高,配偶或伴侣无偿照顾者与子女相比比例较低(aHR,0.66;95% CI,0.56-0.79):辅助生活设施的新住户大多为女性,认知能力受损,患有可能增加其受伤风险的临床合并症,其护理人员为其子女。这些发现强调了提高生活辅助设施中的记忆和痴呆症护理水平以满足这类人群需求的重要性。
{"title":"Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics of New Residents of Assisted Living: A Nested Case-Control Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105270","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105270","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine transitions to an assisted living facility among community-dwelling older adults who received publicly funded home care services.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Nested case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Linked, population-level health system administrative data were obtained from adults aged 65 years and older who received home care services in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. New residents of assisted living were matched on age, sex, and initiation date of home care (± 7 days) to community-dwelling home care recipients in a 1:4 ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical and functional status, health service use, sociodemographic variables, and community-level characteristics were examined; conditional logistic regression was used to model associations with a transition to an assisted living facility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 2427 new residents of assisted living who were matched to 9708 home care recipients [mean (SD) age 85.5 (6.02) years, 72% female]. Most of the new residents were concentrated in urban communities and communities with higher income quintiles. New residents had an increased rate of physician-diagnosed dementia [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14–1.43], mood disorders (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05–1.29), and cardiac arrhythmias (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32). They also had higher rates of mild cognitive impairment (aHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.24–1.66), 2 or more falls (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.51), participation in activities of long-standing interest in the past 7 days (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.50), and a lower rate of a spouse or partner unpaid caregiver vs a child (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56–0.79).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>New residents of assisted living were mostly women, were cognitively impaired, had clinical comorbidities that could increase their risk of injuries, and had caregivers who were their children. These findings stress the importance of upscaling memory and dementia care in assisted living to address the needs of this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Star Ratings in Long-Term Care Facilities in Australia: Facility Characteristics Associated with High Ratings and Changes in Ratings Over Time 澳大利亚长期护理机构的星级评定:与高评级相关的机构特征以及评级随时间的变化。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105272

Objectives

A Star Rating system (1 to 5 stars) of long-term care facilities in Australia is based on 4 sub-categories: compliance, quality measures, residents’ experience, and staffing. The objectives were to examine associations between facility characteristics and the odds of receiving a 4- or 5-star rating, and changes in ratings between the earliest reporting period (October–December 2022) to the most recent (April–June 2023).

Design

Cross-sectional, ecological study, with an additional longitudinal component.

Setting

Long-term care facilities in Australia.

Methods

Associations between facility characteristics and the odds of receiving a 4- or 5-star rating were examined using a multiple logistic regression model. Average changes in overall star rating and each sub-category weighted by fractional contribution to overall star rating were estimated.

Results

Of 2476 facilities, 53.7% received a 4- or 5-star rating, 44.1% a 3-star rating, and 2.1% a 1- or 2-star rating in the April–June 2023 reporting period. Facility characteristics associated with higher odds of 4- or 5-star ratings included small (≤60 residents) and medium-size (61–100 residents) (odds ratios, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.51–3.98 and 1.72; 95% CI, 1.38–2.13, respectively), and Queensland location compared with New South Wales (2.42; 95% CI, 1.87–3.14). Facilities in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas (0.45; 95% CI, 0.33–0.62) and for-profit (0.12; 95% CI, 0.07–0.22) or not-for-profit facilities (0.16; 95% CI, 0.09–0.29) compared with government-operated were associated with lower odds of 4- or 5-star ratings. Between the 2 reporting periods, 25.1% of facilities' star ratings increased and 10.2% decreased (average change 0.156). Residents’ experience, compliance, and staffing had the largest weighted average sub-category rating changes (0.051, 0.042, and 0.042, respectively).

Conclusions

Smaller size, government ownership, and location in socioeconomically advantaged areas were associated with higher odds of 4- or 5-star ratings in long-term care facilities. Average star ratings increased over time but increases and decreases in overall and sub-category ratings were observed.
目标:澳大利亚的长期护理机构星级评定系统(1 星至 5 星)基于 4 个子类别:合规性、质量措施、居民体验和人员配置。目标:研究机构特征与获得 4 星或 5 星评级几率之间的关系,以及最早报告期(2022 年 10 月至 12 月)至最近报告期(2023 年 4 月至 6 月)之间评级的变化:设计:横断面生态研究,附加纵向研究:环境:澳大利亚的长期护理机构:方法:采用多元逻辑回归模型研究机构特征与获得 4 星或 5 星评级几率之间的关系。结果:在 2476 家机构中,53.7% 的机构获得了 4 星或 5 星评级:在 2023 年 4 月至 6 月的报告期内,2476 家医疗机构中有 53.7% 获得了 4 星或 5 星评级,44.1% 获得了 3 星评级,2.1% 获得了 1 星或 2 星评级。与获得 4 星或 5 星评级几率较高相关的机构特征包括小型机构(≤60 名居民)和中型机构(61-100 名居民)(几率比分别为 3.16;95% CI,2.51-3.98 和 1.72;05% CI,1.38-2.13),以及昆士兰与新南威尔士相比的地理位置(2.42;95% CI,1.87-3.14)。与政府运营的医疗机构相比,社会经济条件较差地区的医疗机构(0.45;95% CI,0.33-0.62)、营利性医疗机构(0.12;95% CI,0.07-0.22)或非营利性医疗机构(0.16;95% CI,0.09-0.29)获得 4 星或 5 星评级的几率较低。在两个报告期之间,25.1% 的机构的星级评分有所上升,10.2% 的机构评分有所下降(平均变化为 0.156)。居民体验、合规性和人员配备这三个子类别的加权平均评级变化最大(分别为 0.051、0.042 和 0.042):结论:规模较小、由政府所有以及位于社会经济条件较好地区的长期护理机构获得 4 星或 5 星评级的几率较高。随着时间的推移,平均星级评分有所提高,但总体评分和子类评分有升有降。
{"title":"Star Ratings in Long-Term Care Facilities in Australia: Facility Characteristics Associated with High Ratings and Changes in Ratings Over Time","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105272","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105272","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>A Star Rating system (1 to 5 stars) of long-term care facilities in Australia is based on 4 sub-categories: compliance, quality measures, residents’ experience, and staffing. The objectives were to examine associations between facility characteristics and the odds of receiving a 4- or 5-star rating, and changes in ratings between the earliest reporting period (October–December 2022) to the most recent (April–June 2023).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional, ecological study, with an additional longitudinal component.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Long-term care facilities in Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Associations between facility characteristics and the odds of receiving a 4- or 5-star rating were examined using a multiple logistic regression model. Average changes in overall star rating and each sub-category weighted by fractional contribution to overall star rating were estimated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2476 facilities, 53.7% received a 4- or 5-star rating, 44.1% a 3-star rating, and 2.1% a 1- or 2-star rating in the April–June 2023 reporting period. Facility characteristics associated with higher odds of 4- or 5-star ratings included small (≤60 residents) and medium-size (61–100 residents) (odds ratios, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.51–3.98 and 1.72; 95% CI, 1.38–2.13, respectively), and Queensland location compared with New South Wales (2.42; 95% CI, 1.87–3.14). Facilities in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas (0.45; 95% CI, 0.33–0.62) and for-profit (0.12; 95% CI, 0.07–0.22) or not-for-profit facilities (0.16; 95% CI, 0.09–0.29) compared with government-operated were associated with lower odds of 4- or 5-star ratings. Between the 2 reporting periods, 25.1% of facilities' star ratings increased and 10.2% decreased (average change 0.156). Residents’ experience, compliance, and staffing had the largest weighted average sub-category rating changes (0.051, 0.042, and 0.042, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Smaller size, government ownership, and location in socioeconomically advantaged areas were associated with higher odds of 4- or 5-star ratings in long-term care facilities. Average star ratings increased over time but increases and decreases in overall and sub-category ratings were observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prescription of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in Memory Clinics: Data from the Clinical Pathway for Alzheimer's Disease in China (CPAD) Study 记忆门诊中的非药物干预处方:中国阿尔茨海默病临床路径(CPAD)研究数据。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105273

Objectives

Nonpharmacologic interventions are recommended to improve outcomes in dementia. Little is known about their prescription in practice, especially in non-Western populations. We investigated individual- and institution-level characteristics associated with nonpharmacologic interventions prescription in China.

Design

A multicenter observational study.

Setting and Participants

This study used cross-sectional data from 889 community-dwelling outpatients living with dementia aged ≥45 years from a multicenter registry of 28 memory clinics in China.

Methods

Prescription records of nonpharmacologic interventions, carer and clinic characteristics, and reasons for declining interventions were collected. Multilevel logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the prescription.

Results

Nonpharmacologic interventions were prescribed in 323 people (36.3%) with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Cognitive activities and carer training/support were the most prescribed interventions. Multilevel logistic regression showed that 73% of the variance in prescription was attributed to institutional characteristics of the memory clinic. Greater caregiving gain [odds ratio (OR), 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09], lower burden (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00), worse carer-perceived dyad relationship (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99), and family history of dementia (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.19-3.65) were individual-level factors associated with prescription. Among 440 people considered having a need but received no prescription, declined by user/carer was the main reason for not prescribing (70.7%). Skepticism about effectiveness by physicians/carers and carers being unable or lacking resources to use the interventions were the common reasons given.

Conclusions and Implications

A relatively low prescription rate of nonpharmacologic interventions is related to both individual- and institution-level factors. Carer support and education, instrumental support, and prescription guidelines across specialties and sites are possible strategies to improve access to nonpharmacologic interventions in dementia care.
目的:非药物干预被推荐用于改善痴呆症的治疗效果。但在实践中,尤其是在非西方人群中,人们对其处方知之甚少。我们调查了与中国非药物干预处方相关的个人和机构层面的特征:设计:一项多中心观察性研究:本研究使用了中国 28 家记忆诊所多中心登记的 889 名年龄≥45 岁的社区门诊痴呆患者的横断面数据:方法: 收集非药物干预处方记录、照护者和门诊特点以及拒绝干预的原因。采用多层次逻辑回归法确定与处方相关的因素:323名轻度认知障碍或痴呆症患者(36.3%)接受了非药物干预治疗。认知活动和照护者培训/支持是处方最多的干预措施。多层次逻辑回归显示,73%的处方差异归因于记忆诊所的机构特征。与处方相关的个人因素还包括:更大的护理收益(几率比 [OR],1.05;95% CI,1.02-1.09)、较低的负担(OR,0.97;95% CI,0.95-1.00)、护理者认为较差的二人关系(OR,0.83;95% CI,0.70-0.99)以及痴呆症家族史(OR,2.08;95% CI,1.19-3.65)。在 440 名被认为有需要但未获得处方的患者中,使用者/护理者拒绝是不开具处方的主要原因(70.7%)。医生/护理人员对疗效持怀疑态度以及护理人员无法或缺乏资源使用干预措施是常见的原因:非药物干预处方率相对较低与个人和机构层面的因素有关。照护者支持和教育、工具支持以及各专科和医疗机构的处方指南是改善痴呆症照护中非药物干预的可能策略。
{"title":"Prescription of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in Memory Clinics: Data from the Clinical Pathway for Alzheimer's Disease in China (CPAD) Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105273","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105273","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Nonpharmacologic interventions are recommended to improve outcomes in dementia. Little is known about their prescription in practice, especially in non-Western populations. We investigated individual- and institution-level characteristics associated with nonpharmacologic interventions prescription in China.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A multicenter observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>This study used cross-sectional data from 889 community-dwelling outpatients living with dementia aged ≥45 years from a multicenter registry of 28 memory clinics in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prescription records of nonpharmacologic interventions, carer and clinic characteristics, and reasons for declining interventions were collected. Multilevel logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the prescription.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nonpharmacologic interventions were prescribed in 323 people (36.3%) with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Cognitive activities and carer training/support were the most prescribed interventions. Multilevel logistic regression showed that 73% of the variance in prescription was attributed to institutional characteristics of the memory clinic. Greater caregiving gain [odds ratio (OR), 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09], lower burden (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00), worse carer-perceived dyad relationship (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99), and family history of dementia (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.19-3.65) were individual-level factors associated with prescription. Among 440 people considered having a need but received no prescription, declined by user/carer was the main reason for not prescribing (70.7%). Skepticism about effectiveness by physicians/carers and carers being unable or lacking resources to use the interventions were the common reasons given.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>A relatively low prescription rate of nonpharmacologic interventions is related to both individual- and institution-level factors. Carer support and education, instrumental support, and prescription guidelines across specialties and sites are possible strategies to improve access to nonpharmacologic interventions in dementia care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between Digital Skill, eHealth Literacy, and Frailty among Older Adults: Evidence from China 老年人数字技能、电子健康素养与虚弱之间的关系:来自中国的证据
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105275

Objectives

Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome in older adults; however, its relationship with digital factors is underexplored. This study aimed to examine the association between digital skills, eHealth literacy, and frailty to provide insights for developing frailty interventions in the digital age.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting and Participants

Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey of older adults aged ≥60 years in China.

Methods

We used a digital skills questionnaire, the eHealth Literacy Scale, and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator to measure digital skill, eHealth literacy, and frailty, respectively. Linear regression and logistic models were established to explore the association between digital skill, eHealth literacy, and frailty. Finally, we used a structural equation model and the Karlson-Holm-Breen method to test the mediation.

Results

A total of 2144 older adults were included in this study. The rates of adequate digital skill, adequate eHealth literacy, and frailty were 4.1%, 11.9%, and 38.3%, respectively. Digital skill (β = −0.108; 95% CI, −0.151 to –0.065) and eHealth literacy (β = −0.153; 95% CI, −0.195 to –0.112) were negatively associated with frailty score (P < .05), and adequate digital skill (odds ratio, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.170-0.793) and adequate eHealth literacy (odds ratio, 0.455; 95% CI, 0.298-0.694) were associated with a lower prevalence of frailty. eHealth literacy had a mediating effect on the association between digital skills and frailty.

Conclusions and Implications

Better digital skill and eHealth literacy are associated with a lower prevalence of frailty among older adults. The association between digital skill and frailty was found to be completely mediated by eHealth literacy.
目的:虚弱是老年人常见的老年综合症,但其与数字因素的关系却未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨数字技能、电子健康素养与虚弱之间的关系,为在数字时代制定虚弱干预措施提供见解:设计:横断面研究:数据来自于对中国≥60 岁老年人的横断面调查:我们使用数字技能问卷、电子健康素养量表和蒂尔堡虚弱指标分别测量数字技能、电子健康素养和虚弱。建立线性回归和逻辑模型来探讨数字技能、电子健康素养和虚弱之间的关联。最后,我们使用结构方程模型和卡尔森-霍尔姆-布林方法检验了中介作用:本研究共纳入了 2144 名老年人。充分的数字技能、充分的电子健康素养和虚弱的比例分别为 4.1%、11.9% 和 38.3%。数字技能(β = -0.108; 95% CI, -0.151 to -0.065)和电子健康素养(β = -0.153; 95% CI, -0.195 to -0.112)与虚弱评分呈负相关(P < .05),充分的数字技能(几率比,0.367; 95% CI, 0.170-0.电子健康素养对数字技能与虚弱之间的关联具有中介作用:较好的数字技能和电子健康素养与老年人较低的虚弱患病率有关。数字技能与虚弱之间的关系完全受电子健康素养的影响。
{"title":"Associations between Digital Skill, eHealth Literacy, and Frailty among Older Adults: Evidence from China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105275","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105275","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome in older adults; however, its relationship with digital factors is underexplored. This study aimed to examine the association between digital skills, eHealth literacy, and frailty to provide insights for developing frailty interventions in the digital age.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey of older adults aged ≥60 years in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a digital skills questionnaire, the eHealth Literacy Scale, and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator to measure digital skill, eHealth literacy, and frailty, respectively. Linear regression and logistic models were established to explore the association between digital skill, eHealth literacy, and frailty. Finally, we used a structural equation model and the Karlson-Holm-Breen method to test the mediation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2144 older adults were included in this study. The rates of adequate digital skill, adequate eHealth literacy, and frailty were 4.1%, 11.9%, and 38.3%, respectively. Digital skill (β = −0.108; 95% CI, −0.151 to –0.065) and eHealth literacy (β = −0.153; 95% CI, −0.195 to –0.112) were negatively associated with frailty score (<em>P</em> &lt; .05), and adequate digital skill (odds ratio, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.170-0.793) and adequate eHealth literacy (odds ratio, 0.455; 95% CI, 0.298-0.694) were associated with a lower prevalence of frailty. eHealth literacy had a mediating effect on the association between digital skills and frailty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Better digital skill and eHealth literacy are associated with a lower prevalence of frailty among older adults. The association between digital skill and frailty was found to be completely mediated by eHealth literacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility and Effectiveness of a 12-Week Concurrent Exercise Training on Physical Performance, Muscular Strength, and Myokines in Frail Individuals Living in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial 为期 12 周的同步运动训练对养老院体弱者的体能、肌力和肌动蛋白的可行性和有效性:分组随机交叉试验。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105271

Objective

To examine the feasibility and effects of a 12-week exercise intervention on physical performance, muscular strength, and circulating myokines in frail individuals living in nursing homes.

Design

A cluster randomized, 2-period, 2-intervention crossover trial.

Setting and Participants

Frail residents of 9 nursing homes were randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of concurrent exercise training (n = 5, 29 participants) or usual care (n = 4, 17 participants). The concurrent exercise training consisted of resistance and aerobic exercises (3 days/week). The usual care consisted of everyday routine and standard care. After a 4-week washout period, participants crossed to the other intervention.

Methods

The feasibility outcomes included recruitment rate, dropout rate and reasons, harms during the trial, adherence to exercise, and implementation cost. The primary endpoint was the change in physical performance measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). The secondary endpoints were changes in muscular strength (eg, handgrip strength, isokinetic knee extension, and flexion strength) and serum myokines concentration (myostatin and decorin).

Results

From the 46 participants enrolled (aged 70–99 years, 67.4% female), 34 completed the trial (26.1% dropout rate), the median adherence was 93.75%, and no adverse events occurred during the exercise sessions. The concurrent exercise training provided significant benefits over usual care on SPPB (B = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.35–3.00; P < .001), handgrip strength (B = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.00–3.30; P < .001), myostatin concentrations (B = −7.07; 95% CI, −13.48 to −0.66; P = .031) and myostatin-decorin ratio (B = −95.54; 95% CI, −158.30 to −32.78, P = .004). No significant between-group differences were found for the remaining secondary endpoints.

Conclusions and Implications

This concurrent exercise training is feasible, well-tolerated, and effective in improving physical performance, handgrip strength, myostatin, and myostatin-decorin ratio concentrations in frail older adults residing in nursing homes. These data reinforce the relevance of integrating exercise interventions in long-term care settings.
目的研究为期 12 周的运动干预对居住在养老院的体弱者的体能表现、肌肉力量和循环肌动蛋白的可行性和影响:设计:分组随机、两阶段、两干预交叉试验:9家养老院的体弱居民被随机分配到为期12周的同步运动训练(5人,29名参与者)或常规护理(4人,17名参与者)中。同步运动训练包括阻力和有氧运动(每周 3 天)。常规护理包括日常生活和标准护理。经过 4 周的冲洗期后,参与者转向另一种干预方法:可行性结果包括招募率、辍学率及原因、试验期间的危害、坚持锻炼的情况以及实施成本。主要终点是通过短期体能测试(SPPB)测量的体能变化。次要终点是肌肉力量(例如,手握力量、等速膝关节伸展和屈曲力量)和血清肌动蛋白浓度(肌促蛋白和多黏蛋白)的变化:46 名参与者(年龄在 70-99 岁之间,67.4% 为女性)中,34 人完成了试验(辍学率为 26.1%),中位坚持率为 93.75%,运动过程中未发生任何不良事件。与常规护理相比,同步运动训练在 SPPB(B = 2.18;95% CI,1.35-3.00;P < .001)、手握强度(B = 2.15;95% CI,1.00-3.30;P < .001)、肌生成素浓度(B = -7.07;95% CI,-13.48 至 -0.66;P = .031)和肌生成素-去甲肾上腺素比率(B = -95.54;95% CI,-158.30 至 -32.78,P = .004)。其余次要终点均未发现明显的组间差异:这种同时进行的运动训练是可行的,耐受性良好,并能有效改善居住在养老院的体弱老年人的体能表现、手握力、肌促蛋白和肌促蛋白-蜕皮蛋白比值浓度。这些数据加强了在长期护理环境中整合运动干预的相关性。
{"title":"Feasibility and Effectiveness of a 12-Week Concurrent Exercise Training on Physical Performance, Muscular Strength, and Myokines in Frail Individuals Living in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105271","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105271","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the feasibility and effects of a 12-week exercise intervention on physical performance, muscular strength, and circulating myokines in frail individuals living in nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cluster randomized, 2-period, 2-intervention crossover trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Frail residents of 9 nursing homes were randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of concurrent exercise training (n = 5, 29 participants) or usual care (n = 4, 17 participants). The concurrent exercise training consisted of resistance and aerobic exercises (3 days/week). The usual care consisted of everyday routine and standard care. After a 4-week washout period, participants crossed to the other intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The feasibility outcomes included recruitment rate, dropout rate and reasons, harms during the trial, adherence to exercise, and implementation cost. The primary endpoint was the change in physical performance measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). The secondary endpoints were changes in muscular strength (eg, handgrip strength, isokinetic knee extension, and flexion strength) and serum myokines concentration (myostatin and decorin).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From the 46 participants enrolled (aged 70–99 years, 67.4% female), 34 completed the trial (26.1% dropout rate), the median adherence was 93.75%, and no adverse events occurred during the exercise sessions. The concurrent exercise training provided significant benefits over usual care on SPPB (B = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.35–3.00; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), handgrip strength (B = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.00–3.30; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), myostatin concentrations (B = −7.07; 95% CI, −13.48 to −0.66; <em>P</em> = .031) and myostatin-decorin ratio (B = −95.54; 95% CI, −158.30 to −32.78, <em>P</em> = .004). No significant between-group differences were found for the remaining secondary endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>This concurrent exercise training is feasible, well-tolerated, and effective in improving physical performance, handgrip strength, myostatin, and myostatin-decorin ratio concentrations in frail older adults residing in nursing homes. These data reinforce the relevance of integrating exercise interventions in long-term care settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to 'Deprescribing Interventions for Older Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis' [Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 24 (2023)1718-1725]. 针对老年患者的去处方化干预措施:系统回顾和元分析》[《美国医务主任协会杂志》24 (2023)1718-1725] 更正。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105305
Dan Zhou, Zhaoyan Chen, Fangyuan Tian
{"title":"Corrigendum to 'Deprescribing Interventions for Older Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis' [Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 24 (2023)1718-1725].","authors":"Dan Zhou, Zhaoyan Chen, Fangyuan Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105305","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105305","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Pragmatic Approach to Identifying Goal-Concordant Care for Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementias 为患有阿尔茨海默氏症或相关痴呆症的疗养院住院患者确定目标一致护理的实用方法》(A Pragmatic Approach to Identifying Goal-Concordant Care for Nursing Home Residents with Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementias.
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105266
{"title":"A Pragmatic Approach to Identifying Goal-Concordant Care for Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementias","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105266","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105266","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Hospitalized Older Adults with Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study 住院老年痴呆症患者的口咽吞咽困难:前瞻性队列研究
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105267

Objective

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (dysphagia) is highly prevalent (up to 86%) in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). This study aims to describe the management and clinical course of dysphagia in hospitalized patients with ADRD.

Design

Prospective observational cohort study.

Setting and Participants

The study was conducted across 10 hospitals within a large health system in New York. Participants were older adults with ADRD admitted to the medicine service and diagnosed with dysphagia to liquids on speech-language pathologist (SLP) assessment and were recruited between January and June 2023.

Methods

Baseline characteristics [eg, dementia Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST)], dysphagia management (eg, prescribed diet), and clinical course (eg, dysphagia improvement, respiratory complications) were collected.

Results

Of patients with ADRD and dysphagia (n = 62), the average age was 86.5 and 66.1% were FAST Stage 7. On admission, 48.4% had pneumonia, 79.0% had delirium, and 69.4% were made nil per os (NPO) for aspiration risk. Of those who received SLP reassessment after diet initiation (n = 25), 76% demonstrated dysphagia improvement; 75% of patients with FAST stage 7 demonstrated improvement. Respiratory complications occurred in 21.0% of patients on the following diets: NPO, nasogastric tube feeding, dysphagia diets, and comfort feeds. In univariate analyses, hospital-acquired dehydration, no dysphagia improvement, and delirium were associated with respiratory complications.

Conclusions and Implications

The potential for dysphagia improvement in hospitalized patients with ADRD (even those with advanced dementia) highlights the critical need for standardizing reassessment. Further studies are needed to evaluate factors associated with respiratory complications in this population.
目的:口咽吞咽困难(吞咽困难)在阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)住院患者中发病率很高(高达86%)。本研究旨在描述 ADRD 住院患者吞咽困难的处理方法和临床过程:前瞻性观察队列研究:研究在纽约一家大型医疗系统内的 10 家医院进行。参与者为在内科住院并经语言病理学家(SLP)评估确诊为液体吞咽困难的患有 ADRD 的老年人,招募时间为 2023 年 1 月至 6 月:收集基线特征(如痴呆功能评估分期工具[FAST])、吞咽困难管理(如处方饮食)和临床过程(如吞咽困难改善、呼吸系统并发症):在患有 ADRD 和吞咽困难的患者(n = 62)中,平均年龄为 86.5 岁,66.1% 属于 FAST 第 7 阶段。入院时,48.4%的患者患有肺炎,79.0%的患者出现谵妄,69.4%的患者因有吸入风险而被定为无吸入(NPO)。在饮食开始后接受SLP重新评估的患者中(n = 25),76%的患者吞咽困难有所改善;75%的FAST 7期患者吞咽困难有所改善。在使用以下饮食的患者中,21.0% 出现了呼吸系统并发症:NPO、鼻胃管喂食、吞咽困难饮食和舒适喂食。在单变量分析中,医院获得性脱水、吞咽困难无改善和谵妄与呼吸系统并发症有关:ADRD 住院患者(甚至是晚期痴呆患者)的吞咽困难有可能得到改善,这凸显了标准化重新评估的迫切需要。还需要进一步研究,以评估与该人群呼吸系统并发症相关的因素。
{"title":"Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Hospitalized Older Adults with Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105267","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105267","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Oropharyngeal dysphagia (dysphagia) is highly prevalent (up to 86%) in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). This study aims to describe the management and clinical course of dysphagia in hospitalized patients with ADRD.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective observational cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>The study was conducted across 10 hospitals within a large health system in New York. Participants were older adults with ADRD admitted to the medicine service and diagnosed with dysphagia to liquids on speech-language pathologist (SLP) assessment and were recruited between January and June 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Baseline characteristics [eg, dementia Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST)], dysphagia management (eg, prescribed diet), and clinical course (eg, dysphagia improvement, respiratory complications) were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of patients with ADRD and dysphagia (n = 62), the average age was 86.5 and 66.1% were FAST Stage 7. On admission, 48.4% had pneumonia, 79.0% had delirium, and 69.4% were made nil per os (NPO) for aspiration risk. Of those who received SLP reassessment after diet initiation (n = 25), 76% demonstrated dysphagia improvement; 75% of patients with FAST stage 7 demonstrated improvement. Respiratory complications occurred in 21.0% of patients on the following diets: NPO, nasogastric tube feeding, dysphagia diets, and comfort feeds. In univariate analyses, hospital-acquired dehydration, no dysphagia improvement, and delirium were associated with respiratory complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The potential for dysphagia improvement in hospitalized patients with ADRD (even those with advanced dementia) highlights the critical need for standardizing reassessment. Further studies are needed to evaluate factors associated with respiratory complications in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1