Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106073
Yohanes A Wondimkun, Maria C Inacio, Noleen Bennett, Leon J Worth, Karin Thursky, Rodney James, Malcolm Clark, Janet K Sluggett
Objectives: This study examined the incidence of hospitalizations for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and associated factors among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) during the first 12 months of their LTCF stay.
Setting and participants: This study included people aged ≥65 years who first entered an LTCF between 2015 and 2018 using data from the Registry of Senior Australians National Historical Cohort.
Methods: The cumulative incidence of hospitalizations of UTI in the 12 months following LTCF entry was evaluated. Individual, facility, medicine, and service utilization-related factors associated with hospitalizations for UTIs were investigated. A Fine-Gray model was used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% CIs.
Results: Of the 180,858 people included from 2464 LTCFs, 59.7% (n = 107,914) were female, with a median age of 85 years. The cumulative incidence of hospitalizations for UTIs in the 12 months after LTCF entry was 3.7% (95% CI 3.7-3.8). Factors associated with a higher rate of hospitalizations for UTIs included long-term urinary catheter use (sHR 3.39, 95% CI 3.16-3.65), history of hospitalizations with UTI (sHR 2.33, 95% CI 2.21-2.46), preferred language other than English (sHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48), diabetes (sHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37), high (sHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41) or medium (sHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.32) need for assistance with activities of daily living, cerebrovascular disease (sHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20), and urinary incontinence (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15).
Conclusions and implications: A considerable burden of UTI-associated hospitalizations was observed in Australian LTCFs, which can be minimized through implementing effective UTI prevention, detection, and management strategies.
目的:本研究调查了长期护理机构(LTCF)住院的前12个月内尿路感染(uti)住院的发生率及其相关因素。设计:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。环境和参与者:本研究包括年龄≥65岁的人,他们在2015年至2018年期间首次进入LTCF,使用的数据来自澳大利亚老年人国家历史队列登记处。方法:评估LTCF入组后12个月内尿路感染住院累计发生率。调查了与尿路感染住院相关的个人、设施、药物和服务利用相关因素。采用Fine-Gray模型估计亚分布风险比(sHRs)和95% ci。结果:在2464例ltcf纳入的180858例患者中,59.7% (n = 107914)为女性,中位年龄为85岁。LTCF入组后12个月内尿路感染住院的累计发生率为3.7% (95% CI 3.7-3.8)。与尿路感染住院率较高相关的因素包括:长期使用导尿管(sHR 3.39, 95% CI 3.16-3.65)、尿路感染住院史(sHR 2.33, 95% CI 2.21-2.46)、首选非英语语言(sHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48)、糖尿病(sHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37)、日常生活活动需要帮助程度高(sHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41)或中等(sHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.32)、脑血管疾病(sHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20)。尿失禁(sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15)。结论和意义:在澳大利亚ltcf中观察到与尿路感染相关的住院负担相当大,可以通过实施有效的尿路感染预防、检测和管理策略将其降至最低。
{"title":"Incidence and Factors Associated With Hospitalizations for Urinary Tract Infections Among Older People Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities.","authors":"Yohanes A Wondimkun, Maria C Inacio, Noleen Bennett, Leon J Worth, Karin Thursky, Rodney James, Malcolm Clark, Janet K Sluggett","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106073","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the incidence of hospitalizations for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and associated factors among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) during the first 12 months of their LTCF stay.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>This study included people aged ≥65 years who first entered an LTCF between 2015 and 2018 using data from the Registry of Senior Australians National Historical Cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cumulative incidence of hospitalizations of UTI in the 12 months following LTCF entry was evaluated. Individual, facility, medicine, and service utilization-related factors associated with hospitalizations for UTIs were investigated. A Fine-Gray model was used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 180,858 people included from 2464 LTCFs, 59.7% (n = 107,914) were female, with a median age of 85 years. The cumulative incidence of hospitalizations for UTIs in the 12 months after LTCF entry was 3.7% (95% CI 3.7-3.8). Factors associated with a higher rate of hospitalizations for UTIs included long-term urinary catheter use (sHR 3.39, 95% CI 3.16-3.65), history of hospitalizations with UTI (sHR 2.33, 95% CI 2.21-2.46), preferred language other than English (sHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48), diabetes (sHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37), high (sHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41) or medium (sHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.32) need for assistance with activities of daily living, cerebrovascular disease (sHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20), and urinary incontinence (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>A considerable burden of UTI-associated hospitalizations was observed in Australian LTCFs, which can be minimized through implementing effective UTI prevention, detection, and management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106033
Erin O'Brien, Carolyn Kazdan, Amanda Lathia, Andres Salazar, Angie Szumlinski, Donna Thorson, Tiffany Tsay, Brianna Wynne
{"title":"Falls and Fall Prevention in the Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Setting Clinical Practice Guideline.","authors":"Erin O'Brien, Carolyn Kazdan, Amanda Lathia, Andres Salazar, Angie Szumlinski, Donna Thorson, Tiffany Tsay, Brianna Wynne","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106033"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106043
Muhammad Taufan Umasugi
{"title":"Converting Education Into Safer Care in Long-Term Care: Evidence-Based Design, Workforce Reality, and Indonesia's Path.","authors":"Muhammad Taufan Umasugi","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106043","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145804840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105252
Jonathan Foo, Melanie Roberts, Lauren T Williams, Christian Osadnik, Judy Bauer, Marie-Claire O'Shea
Objective: To develop and internally validate a malnutrition screening tool based on routinely collected data in the long-term care setting.
Design: Diagnostic prediction model development and internal validation study.
Setting and participants: Residents (n = 539) from 10 long-term care facilities in Australia.
Methods: Candidate variables identified through expert consultation were collected from routinely collected data in a convenience sample of long-term care facilities. Logistic regression using the Subjective Global Assessment as the reference standard was conducted on 500 samples derived using bootstrapping from the original sample. Candidate variables were selected if included in more than 95% of samples using backwards stepwise elimination. The final model was developed using logistic regression of selected variables. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping to calculate the optimism-adjusted performance. Overall discrimination was evaluated via receiver operator characteristic curve and calculation of the area under the curve. Youden's Index was used to identify the optimal threshold value for classifying malnutrition. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Results: Body mass index and weight change % over 6 months were included in the automated malnutrition screening model (AutoMal), identified in 100% of bootstrapped samples. AutoMal demonstrated excellent discrimination of malnutrition, with area under the curve of 0.8378 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87). Youden's Index value was 0.37, resulting in sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 71%-83%) and specificity of 77% (72%-81%). Optimism-corrected area under the curve was 0.8354.
Conclusions and implications: The AutoMal demonstrates excellent ability to differentiate malnutrition status. It makes automated identification of malnutrition possible by using 2 variables commonly found in electronic health records.
{"title":"An Automated Malnutrition Screening Tool Using Routinely Collected Data for Older Adults in Long-Term Care: Development and Internal Validation of AutoMal.","authors":"Jonathan Foo, Melanie Roberts, Lauren T Williams, Christian Osadnik, Judy Bauer, Marie-Claire O'Shea","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105252","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and internally validate a malnutrition screening tool based on routinely collected data in the long-term care setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Diagnostic prediction model development and internal validation study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Residents (n = 539) from 10 long-term care facilities in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Candidate variables identified through expert consultation were collected from routinely collected data in a convenience sample of long-term care facilities. Logistic regression using the Subjective Global Assessment as the reference standard was conducted on 500 samples derived using bootstrapping from the original sample. Candidate variables were selected if included in more than 95% of samples using backwards stepwise elimination. The final model was developed using logistic regression of selected variables. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping to calculate the optimism-adjusted performance. Overall discrimination was evaluated via receiver operator characteristic curve and calculation of the area under the curve. Youden's Index was used to identify the optimal threshold value for classifying malnutrition. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass index and weight change % over 6 months were included in the automated malnutrition screening model (AutoMal), identified in 100% of bootstrapped samples. AutoMal demonstrated excellent discrimination of malnutrition, with area under the curve of 0.8378 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87). Youden's Index value was 0.37, resulting in sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 71%-83%) and specificity of 77% (72%-81%). Optimism-corrected area under the curve was 0.8354.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>The AutoMal demonstrates excellent ability to differentiate malnutrition status. It makes automated identification of malnutrition possible by using 2 variables commonly found in electronic health records.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106010
Lauren Beam, Satheesh Gunaga, David Willens, Joseph Miller, Fabrice I Mowbray
{"title":"Outpatient Triage Models and Older Adults: An Opportunity for Improvement.","authors":"Lauren Beam, Satheesh Gunaga, David Willens, Joseph Miller, Fabrice I Mowbray","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106010"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145588048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106092
Qiuyuan Qin, Aaron Bloschichak, Helena Temkin-Greener, Shubing Cai
Objective: To examine whether having tele-mental health (tele-MH) visits with new providers is different by race, ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and rurality.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting and participants: This study linked 2019 and 2021 Medicare claims data. We included community-dwelling Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias who had at least 1 tele-MH visit in 2021.
Methods: The outcome variable was whether an individual had tele-MH visits with new providers in 2021, compared with providers they had in 2019, measured by comparing the list of providers they had visits with using Medicare outpatient claims data. The main variables of interest were race, ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and rurality, measured using the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File. Logistic regression models, with zip code-level random effects, were estimated while accounting for individual- and community-level characteristics.
Results: The analytical sample included 99,329 individuals, of whom 53.6% had MH care with new providers via tele-MH services in 2021. After accounting for individual- and community-level characteristics, Black individuals (odds ratio [OR], 1.158; 95% CI, 1.096-1.222; P < .01), Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibles (OR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.027-1.105; P < .01), and rural residents (1.215; 95% CI, 1.125-1.312; P < .01) were more likely to have tele-MH visits with new providers compared with their White, nondual-eligible, and metropolitan counterparts, respectively.
Conclusions and implications: Telemedicine may improve MH care access for underserved populations by facilitating connections with new MH providers.
目的:研究新就诊者的远程心理健康(远程mh)就诊是否因种族、民族、医疗-医疗补助双重资格和农村地区而异。设计:回顾性研究。环境和参与者:本研究将2019年和2021年的医疗保险索赔数据联系起来。我们纳入了患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的社区医疗保险服务收费受益人,他们在2021年至少有1次远程mh就诊。方法:结果变量是,与2019年的提供者相比,个人是否在2021年与新的提供者进行了远程mh访问,通过将他们访问的提供者列表与使用医疗保险门诊索赔数据进行比较来衡量。主要感兴趣的变量是种族、民族、医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格和农村性,使用医疗保险受益人摘要文件进行测量。在考虑个人和社区水平特征的同时,估计了具有邮政编码水平随机效应的Logistic回归模型。结果:分析样本包括99,329人,其中53.6%的人在2021年通过远程MH服务与新的提供者进行了MH护理。在考虑了个人和社区水平的特征后,黑人个体(比值比[OR], 1.158; 95% CI, 1.096-1.222; P < 0.01)、医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格者(OR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.027-1.105; P < 0.01)和农村居民(1.215;95% CI, 1.125-1.312; P < 0.01)分别比白人、非双重资格者和城市居民更有可能与新的提供者进行远程mh就诊。结论和意义:远程医疗可以通过促进与新的医院提供者的联系,改善服务不足人群的医院护理机会。
{"title":"Access to Mental Health Providers Among Older Adults With ADRD Using Telemedicine.","authors":"Qiuyuan Qin, Aaron Bloschichak, Helena Temkin-Greener, Shubing Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether having tele-mental health (tele-MH) visits with new providers is different by race, ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and rurality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>This study linked 2019 and 2021 Medicare claims data. We included community-dwelling Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias who had at least 1 tele-MH visit in 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The outcome variable was whether an individual had tele-MH visits with new providers in 2021, compared with providers they had in 2019, measured by comparing the list of providers they had visits with using Medicare outpatient claims data. The main variables of interest were race, ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and rurality, measured using the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File. Logistic regression models, with zip code-level random effects, were estimated while accounting for individual- and community-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytical sample included 99,329 individuals, of whom 53.6% had MH care with new providers via tele-MH services in 2021. After accounting for individual- and community-level characteristics, Black individuals (odds ratio [OR], 1.158; 95% CI, 1.096-1.222; P < .01), Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibles (OR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.027-1.105; P < .01), and rural residents (1.215; 95% CI, 1.125-1.312; P < .01) were more likely to have tele-MH visits with new providers compared with their White, nondual-eligible, and metropolitan counterparts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Telemedicine may improve MH care access for underserved populations by facilitating connections with new MH providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106075
Iris R van der Horst, Laura W van Buul, Martin Smalbrugge, Cees M P M Hertogh, Meriam M Janssen, Sascha R Bolt, Sacha D Kuil, Robbert Huijsman, Debby L Gerritsen, Daisy Kolk
Objectives: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, public debate arose regarding the proportionality of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in nursing homes (NHs), as these measures negatively impacted residents' well-being. To be better prepared for future outbreaks and pandemics, we need a deeper understanding of how NHs manage COVID-19 or influenza outbreaks, and which considerations are being made to balance IPC and well-being.
Design: Mixed-methods study.
Setting and participants: Fourteen Dutch NH organizations (176 NH locations) where COVID-19 or influenza outbreaks occurred during winter 2022-2023 were included.
Methods: We monitored the progression and management of 24 outbreaks by administering weekly questionnaires. Heterogeneous sampling was used to select 7 outbreaks for extensive monitoring, including epidemiologic data collection on the resident level and outbreak management evaluation through qualitative interviews (n = 7). Quantitative data were used for descriptive analysis (all outbreaks) and the generation of epidemiologic curves (extensively monitored outbreaks). Qualitative interview data were used to deepen our understanding of the considerations and adjustments made to IPC strategies by NH staff.
Results: We observed differences in IPC measures taken between NH organizations, but also within NH organizations, as IPC protocols were often customized to fit specific units, residents, or situations during outbreaks. Staff consistently considered the impact of IPC measures on residents against their beliefs about the effectiveness of measures, which occasionally led them to deviate from their IPC strategy in favor of residents' well-being.
Conclusion and implications: The current study provides an understanding of how COVID-19 and influenza outbreaks were managed, how NH staff considered the impact and effectiveness of measures, and consequently, how IPC strategies were gradually adjusted during outbreaks. Acknowledging that although the majority of NH staff consistently recognize the need to tailor IPC measures, they inconsistently apply such customization in practice, which may help NH organizations better prepare for future outbreaks.
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Study Into COVID-19 and Influenza Outbreak Management in Nursing Homes: The Challenge of Seeking Balance Between Infection Prevention and Well-being.","authors":"Iris R van der Horst, Laura W van Buul, Martin Smalbrugge, Cees M P M Hertogh, Meriam M Janssen, Sascha R Bolt, Sacha D Kuil, Robbert Huijsman, Debby L Gerritsen, Daisy Kolk","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106075","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, public debate arose regarding the proportionality of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in nursing homes (NHs), as these measures negatively impacted residents' well-being. To be better prepared for future outbreaks and pandemics, we need a deeper understanding of how NHs manage COVID-19 or influenza outbreaks, and which considerations are being made to balance IPC and well-being.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Fourteen Dutch NH organizations (176 NH locations) where COVID-19 or influenza outbreaks occurred during winter 2022-2023 were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We monitored the progression and management of 24 outbreaks by administering weekly questionnaires. Heterogeneous sampling was used to select 7 outbreaks for extensive monitoring, including epidemiologic data collection on the resident level and outbreak management evaluation through qualitative interviews (n = 7). Quantitative data were used for descriptive analysis (all outbreaks) and the generation of epidemiologic curves (extensively monitored outbreaks). Qualitative interview data were used to deepen our understanding of the considerations and adjustments made to IPC strategies by NH staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed differences in IPC measures taken between NH organizations, but also within NH organizations, as IPC protocols were often customized to fit specific units, residents, or situations during outbreaks. Staff consistently considered the impact of IPC measures on residents against their beliefs about the effectiveness of measures, which occasionally led them to deviate from their IPC strategy in favor of residents' well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>The current study provides an understanding of how COVID-19 and influenza outbreaks were managed, how NH staff considered the impact and effectiveness of measures, and consequently, how IPC strategies were gradually adjusted during outbreaks. Acknowledging that although the majority of NH staff consistently recognize the need to tailor IPC measures, they inconsistently apply such customization in practice, which may help NH organizations better prepare for future outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106075"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106084
Rianne A.A. de Heus PhD , Malissa J. Janssen MSc , Elly Prins MSc , Ruslan Leontjevas PhD , Debby L. Gerritsen PhD , Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans MD, PhD , Christian Bakker PhD
Management of disinhibited behavior in people with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia is challenging. To support health care professionals in long-term care, we developed “Focusing,” a psychosocial intervention based on theory of automatic behavior, stimulus processing, and resident-staff interactions. The intervention was evaluated for feasibility and limited efficacy with a replicated single-case A-B observation study in 6 cases, and using questionnaires and interviews with health care professionals. The intervention was feasible in all cases and a decrease in disinhibited behavior was observed following the introduction of the intervention in 4 cases. Professionals deemed the intervention highly relevant, as they perceive disinhibition as a complex problem. These results form a foundation for larger-scale evaluation of effectiveness and show promise of the intervention for further implementation in clinical practice.
{"title":"A Psychosocial Intervention for Managing Disinhibition in People With the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia: A Matter of Focusing","authors":"Rianne A.A. de Heus PhD , Malissa J. Janssen MSc , Elly Prins MSc , Ruslan Leontjevas PhD , Debby L. Gerritsen PhD , Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans MD, PhD , Christian Bakker PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106084","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106084","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Management of disinhibited behavior in people with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia is challenging. To support health care professionals in long-term care, we developed “Focusing,” a psychosocial intervention based on theory of automatic behavior, stimulus processing, and resident-staff interactions. The intervention was evaluated for feasibility and limited efficacy with a replicated single-case A-B observation study in 6 cases, and using questionnaires and interviews with health care professionals. The intervention was feasible in all cases and a decrease in disinhibited behavior was observed following the introduction of the intervention in 4 cases. Professionals deemed the intervention highly relevant, as they perceive disinhibition as a complex problem. These results form a foundation for larger-scale evaluation of effectiveness and show promise of the intervention for further implementation in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 106084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146011088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106102
Charlotte M Nijskens, Julia H I Wiersinga, Janet L MacNeil-Vroomen, Rik van Eekelen, Marieke J Henstra, Dominique E J van Anrooij, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, Mike J L Peters, Frank L J Visseren, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Majon Muller
Objectives: In preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs) in frail older people, it is essential to balance estimated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk with potential treatment benefits and harms. SCORE2-OP estimates CVD risk in older people but has not been validated in frail older patients. We evaluated the performance of SCORE2-OP for predicting CVD mortality in this group.
Design: External validation study.
Setting and participants: Amsterdam Ageing Cohort, including 1797 older outpatients.
Methods: Data on incident myocardial infarction and stroke were unavailable. Five-year all-cause and CVD mortality were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. For calibration, we compared 5-year CVD mortality with 5-year CVD risk calculated by SCORE2-OP in observed-to-expected ratios. Discrimination was assessed with Harrell's C-index. Analyses were stratified by ASCVD history, and physical and cognitive functioning.
Results: We included 1797 patients (median age, 79 years; interquartile range, 75-84; 48% male; 39% ASCVD history). Over a median survival time of 2.0 years (interquartile range, 1.0-3.3), 623 people (35%) died, including 95 from CVD. The 5-year CVD mortality was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.1-7.7), the mean calculated CVD risk was 7.9%. The overall observed-to-expected ratio for cardiovascular mortality was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.80-0.82), and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.51-0.53) in people without ASCVD history. C-indices were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.47-0.70) overall and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85) in those without ASCVD history. Stratification by physical and cognitive functioning did not impact C-indices.
Conclusions and implications: In a frail older outpatient population, SCORE2-OP showed notable discrimination for CVD mortality in those without ASCVD history. This suggests that SCORE2-OP can be used for CVD risk estimation in these frail outpatients.
{"title":"External Validation of SCORE2-OP for Predicting Cardiovascular Mortality in Frail Geriatric Outpatients.","authors":"Charlotte M Nijskens, Julia H I Wiersinga, Janet L MacNeil-Vroomen, Rik van Eekelen, Marieke J Henstra, Dominique E J van Anrooij, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, Mike J L Peters, Frank L J Visseren, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Majon Muller","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs) in frail older people, it is essential to balance estimated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk with potential treatment benefits and harms. SCORE2-OP estimates CVD risk in older people but has not been validated in frail older patients. We evaluated the performance of SCORE2-OP for predicting CVD mortality in this group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>External validation study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Amsterdam Ageing Cohort, including 1797 older outpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on incident myocardial infarction and stroke were unavailable. Five-year all-cause and CVD mortality were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. For calibration, we compared 5-year CVD mortality with 5-year CVD risk calculated by SCORE2-OP in observed-to-expected ratios. Discrimination was assessed with Harrell's C-index. Analyses were stratified by ASCVD history, and physical and cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1797 patients (median age, 79 years; interquartile range, 75-84; 48% male; 39% ASCVD history). Over a median survival time of 2.0 years (interquartile range, 1.0-3.3), 623 people (35%) died, including 95 from CVD. The 5-year CVD mortality was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.1-7.7), the mean calculated CVD risk was 7.9%. The overall observed-to-expected ratio for cardiovascular mortality was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.80-0.82), and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.51-0.53) in people without ASCVD history. C-indices were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.47-0.70) overall and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85) in those without ASCVD history. Stratification by physical and cognitive functioning did not impact C-indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>In a frail older outpatient population, SCORE2-OP showed notable discrimination for CVD mortality in those without ASCVD history. This suggests that SCORE2-OP can be used for CVD risk estimation in these frail outpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"106102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106085
Qiqing Zhong MSN, Yifan Wu MSN, Shuyan Fang PhD, Shengze Zhi PhD, Jiaxin Li PhD, Mengyuan Li MSN, Huizhen Zhang MSN, Jianing Lang MSN, Daiyao Li BSN, Jiao Sun PhD
Objectives
Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent yet often overlooked condition in older adults, significantly impacting both quality of life and health care systems. This study aimed to explore the pooled prevalence of FI among older adults.
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Setting and Participants
Ninety-five studies involving 595,019 older adults across community, hospital, and long-term care settings.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 6 English and 4 Chinese databases. Two reviewers independently searched records and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled prevalence, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 95% prediction intervals (PIs), and heterogeneity. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated via multivariable meta-regression and prespecified subgroup analyses (exploring region, population setting, case definition, frequency threshold, and mode of ascertainment). All statistical analyses used Stata 18.0.
Results
The pooled prevalence of FI was 14.1% (95% CI, 11.7%–16.7%), but this masked extreme heterogeneity (I2 = 99.86%, τ2 = 0.125, P < .001; 95% PI, 7.6%–24.7%). Multivariable meta-regression identified long-term care settings [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.55] and Australia and Oceania (adjusted OR, 2.48) as significant predictors. The model explained only 23.22% of heterogeneity, leaving extreme residual variance (Residual I2 = 99.72%), strongly suggesting methodological inconsistencies (eg, definitions, ascertainment methods) are the predominant drivers of heterogeneity.
Conclusions and Implications
FI affects approximately 1 in 7 older adults globally, with the greatest burden in long-term care settings. Extreme residual heterogeneity limits generalizability and is strongly suggestive of methodological inconsistencies as the predominant drivers. Improving detection and comparability necessitates harmonized case definitions (International Continence Society and International Urogynecological Association) and validated instruments (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) in research. In clinical practice, particularly long-term care, a brief 2-step screening (eg, Bristol Stool Form, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Bowel) at admission and regular reviews is advisable, with an electronic health record flag to trigger conservative bowel management and specialist referral as needed.
{"title":"Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Qiqing Zhong MSN, Yifan Wu MSN, Shuyan Fang PhD, Shengze Zhi PhD, Jiaxin Li PhD, Mengyuan Li MSN, Huizhen Zhang MSN, Jianing Lang MSN, Daiyao Li BSN, Jiao Sun PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106085","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106085","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent yet often overlooked condition in older adults, significantly impacting both quality of life and health care systems. This study aimed to explore the pooled prevalence of FI among older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Ninety-five studies involving 595,019 older adults across community, hospital, and long-term care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 6 English and 4 Chinese databases. Two reviewers independently searched records and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled prevalence, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 95% prediction intervals (PIs), and heterogeneity. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated via multivariable meta-regression and prespecified subgroup analyses (exploring region, population setting, case definition, frequency threshold, and mode of ascertainment). All statistical analyses used Stata 18.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pooled prevalence of FI was 14.1% (95% CI, 11.7%–16.7%), but this masked extreme heterogeneity (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 99.86%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.125, <em>P</em> < .001; 95% PI, 7.6%–24.7%). Multivariable meta-regression identified long-term care settings [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.55] and Australia and Oceania (adjusted OR, 2.48) as significant predictors. The model explained only 23.22% of heterogeneity, leaving extreme residual variance (Residual <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 99.72%), strongly suggesting methodological inconsistencies (eg, definitions, ascertainment methods) are the predominant drivers of heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>FI affects approximately 1 in 7 older adults globally, with the greatest burden in long-term care settings. Extreme residual heterogeneity limits generalizability and is strongly suggestive of methodological inconsistencies as the predominant drivers. Improving detection and comparability necessitates harmonized case definitions (International Continence Society and International Urogynecological Association) and validated instruments (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) in research. In clinical practice, particularly long-term care, a brief 2-step screening (eg, Bristol Stool Form, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Bowel) at admission and regular reviews is advisable, with an electronic health record flag to trigger conservative bowel management and specialist referral as needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 106085"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}