Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry最新文献

Objective

There has been an increase in youth psychiatric emergencies and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations in recent years. Mobile crisis response (MCR) services offer an opportunity to meet acute youth mental health needs in the community and to provide linkage to care. However, an understanding of MCR encounters as a care pathway is needed, including how patterns of subsequent care may vary by youth race/ethnicity. The current study examines racial/ethnic differences in the rates of inpatient care use following MCR among youth.

Method

Data included Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH) administrative claims for MCR in 2017 and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient services from 2017-2020 for youth aged 0 to 18 years.

Results

In this sample of 6,908 youth (70.4% racial/ethnic minoritized youth) who received an MCR, 3.2% received inpatient care within 30 days of their MCR, 18.6% received inpatient care beyond 30 days of their MCR, and 14.7% received repeated inpatient care episodes during the study period. Multivariate models revealed that Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) youth were less likely to receive inpatient care, whereas American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth were more likely to receive inpatient care following MCR. Youth age, primary language, primary diagnosis, and insurance status also predicted future inpatient episodes.

Conclusion

Findings highlight differential rates of inpatient use following MCR among AAPI and AI/AN youth relative to youth from other groups. Alternative interpretations for the findings are offered related to differential levels of need and disparate penetration of community-based outpatient and prevention-focused services.

Plain language summary

The study investigates racial and ethnic differences in the rates of inpatient care receipt after youth experience a psychiatric emergency in Los Angeles County. A total of 6,908 youth received mobile crisis response services and participated in the study. No racial/ethnic differences emerged in inpatient care use within the first month of receiving mobile crisis response services, but in the longer-term, Asian American/Pacific Islander youth were the least likely to receive inpatient care, and American Indian/Alaska Native youth were the most likely to receive inpatient. No differences in inpatient care use were observed for Black and Latinx youth relative to other youth in the study. Given the high costs for inpatient care, it remains critical to connect high-risk minoritized youth to less costly community-based care.

Plain language summary

In this article, the author reflects upon recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have led to profound discussions about AI’s role in scientific research and education. AI technologies are now capable of summarizing and analyzing large volumes of data, creating presentations, and even drafting parts of scientific papers and grants with minimal human input. With their exponential ongoing advancements, they will become even more capable in doing these tasks. As boundaries between humans and AI blurs, serious questions arise about the future roles, responsibilities, and identity of academic researchers, intellectual property, publishing and grantsmanship, and equity in the world of AI potentiated research.

Objective

To evaluate the reporting of race/ethnicity data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications. Secondary objectives were to estimate temporal trends in the reporting, and to compare the pooled prevalence of racial/ethnic groups in RCTs conducted in the US to national estimates.

Method

We drew on, adapted, and updated the search of a network meta-analysis by Cortese et al. (2018) up to March 2022. We calculated the percentage of RCTs reporting data on race/ethnicity of participants in the published article or in related unpublished material. Temporal trends were estimated with logistic regression. The pooled prevalence of each racial/ethnic group across US RCTs was calculated using random-effects model meta-analyses.

Results

We retained 310 RCTs (including 44,447 participants), of which 231 were conducted in children/adolescents, 78 in adults, and 1 in both. Data on race/ethnicity were reported in 59.3% of the RCTs (75% of which were conducted in children/adolescents and 25% in adults) in the published article, and in unpublished material in an additional 8.7% of the RCTs. Reporting improved over time. In the US RCTs, Asian and White individuals were under- and overrepresented, respectively, compared to national estimates in the most recent time period considered.

Conclusion

More than 30% of the RCTs of ADHD medications retained in this review did not include data on race/ethnicity in their published or unpublished reports, and more than 40% in their published articles, even though reporting improved over time. Results should inform investigators, authors, editors, regulators, and study participants in relation to efforts to tackle inequalities in ADHD research.

Plain language summary

A systematic review of 310 randomized controlled trials for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications found that race/ethnicity were reported in only 30% of trials. Compared to national estimates, Asian individuals were underrepresented and non-Hispanic Whites individuals were overrepresented, drawing attention to the inequities in participation in ADHD research.

Diversity & Inclusion Statement

One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.

The author list of this paper includes contributors from