Marek Purm, Kristyna Falatkova, Lukáš Vlček, Václav Šípek
The study is focused on the evaluation of multi-site and multi-variable calibration of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model. The variables used for the multi-calibration approach comprised snow water equivalent, soil water content, and discharge. The calibrated model was further used to investigate the influence of small water reservoirs on the runoff regime in the Upper Vydra catchment, Czech Republic (89.9 km2). The multi-calibration approach led to significantly improved estimation of snow accumulation/melt, soil water storage, as well as discharge at incorporated subbasins. The values of the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient in the validation period improved from 0.65 to 0.82 for snow water equivalent, from −25.6 to 0.13 for soil water storage, and from 0.39 to 0.41 for discharge on average for all measuring stations. At the expense of the multi-calibration approach, the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient decreased from 0.61 to 0.53 for discharge simulation in the closing profile. Due to their small storage volumes, the small water reservoirs had a modest effect on mitigating low-flow conditions. In two pronounced drought periods in 2015 and 2018, the number of days with the discharge below minimum sustainable flow was reduced by 7 and 8 days, respectively. The volume of four inspected peak flows was reduced by less than 1%, indicating minimal impact of the reservoirs when used as the only flood mitigation measure.
{"title":"Multicriterial Calibration of SWAT to Assess Small Water Reservoirs' Impact on Extreme Flow Mitigation","authors":"Marek Purm, Kristyna Falatkova, Lukáš Vlček, Václav Šípek","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70073","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study is focused on the evaluation of multi-site and multi-variable calibration of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model. The variables used for the multi-calibration approach comprised snow water equivalent, soil water content, and discharge. The calibrated model was further used to investigate the influence of small water reservoirs on the runoff regime in the Upper Vydra catchment, Czech Republic (89.9 km<sup>2</sup>). The multi-calibration approach led to significantly improved estimation of snow accumulation/melt, soil water storage, as well as discharge at incorporated subbasins. The values of the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient in the validation period improved from 0.65 to 0.82 for snow water equivalent, from −25.6 to 0.13 for soil water storage, and from 0.39 to 0.41 for discharge on average for all measuring stations. At the expense of the multi-calibration approach, the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient decreased from 0.61 to 0.53 for discharge simulation in the closing profile. Due to their small storage volumes, the small water reservoirs had a modest effect on mitigating low-flow conditions. In two pronounced drought periods in 2015 and 2018, the number of days with the discharge below minimum sustainable flow was reduced by 7 and 8 days, respectively. The volume of four inspected peak flows was reduced by less than 1%, indicating minimal impact of the reservoirs when used as the only flood mitigation measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"61 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carol L. Luukkonen, Ayman H. Alzraiee, Deidre M. Herbert, Richard G. Niswonger, Joshua D. Larsen, Cheryl A. Buchwald, Natalie A. Houston, Cheryl A. Dieter, Lisa D. Miller, Jana S. Stewart
The U.S. Geological Survey is developing nationally consistent water-use modeling approaches to replace previous methods relying on locally specific reported and estimated data. These national assessments require datasets that incorporate water withdrawal variability across the United States and over long periods. However, source data often have unclear definitions, missing or varied units, differing temporal resolutions, varied data quality, and inconsistent formats, which hinder automation and require individualized processing. The public-supply datasets described in this paper were used in machine learning models to estimate annual and monthly public-supply water use for 2000–2020 for the conterminous United States (CONUS) and in a model to estimate public-supply deliveries. Public-supply withdrawal data were acquired for the CONUS and the District of Columbia; however, 11 states had annual data for only 1 year, and 10 states had no monthly data. Annual withdrawal data were acquired for 81% of public-supply water service areas, and monthly withdrawal data were acquired for 47% for at least 1 year from 2000 to 2020. These datasets and methods provide the most comprehensive collection of reported public-supply withdrawals to date and can be used by water-use managers, the scientific community, and the broader public. The extensive data processing described herein can be applicable to datasets representing other categories of water use.
{"title":"Harmonization of a Water Withdrawal Dataset for the Conterminous United States","authors":"Carol L. Luukkonen, Ayman H. Alzraiee, Deidre M. Herbert, Richard G. Niswonger, Joshua D. Larsen, Cheryl A. Buchwald, Natalie A. Houston, Cheryl A. Dieter, Lisa D. Miller, Jana S. Stewart","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70054","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The U.S. Geological Survey is developing nationally consistent water-use modeling approaches to replace previous methods relying on locally specific reported and estimated data. These national assessments require datasets that incorporate water withdrawal variability across the United States and over long periods. However, source data often have unclear definitions, missing or varied units, differing temporal resolutions, varied data quality, and inconsistent formats, which hinder automation and require individualized processing. The public-supply datasets described in this paper were used in machine learning models to estimate annual and monthly public-supply water use for 2000–2020 for the conterminous United States (CONUS) and in a model to estimate public-supply deliveries. Public-supply withdrawal data were acquired for the CONUS and the District of Columbia; however, 11 states had annual data for only 1 year, and 10 states had no monthly data. Annual withdrawal data were acquired for 81% of public-supply water service areas, and monthly withdrawal data were acquired for 47% for at least 1 year from 2000 to 2020. These datasets and methods provide the most comprehensive collection of reported public-supply withdrawals to date and can be used by water-use managers, the scientific community, and the broader public. The extensive data processing described herein can be applicable to datasets representing other categories of water use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"61 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xingxing Du, Xiangxiang Cui, Shan Lei, Xueqing Zhang, Suhua Meng, Kun Liu
The lower Yellow River is a key watershed between the Haihe and Huaihe Rivers. The Kaifeng section, as a key river segment, holds significant geographical and ecological importance, and studying its shallow groundwater hydrochemistry is crucial for sustainable groundwater use. This study systematically analyzes the hydrochemical characteristics of shallow groundwater in the region using methods like Piper diagrams, Gibbs plots, ion ratios, and mathematical analysis to elucidate groundwater formation mechanisms, thereby filling a critical gap in systematic research on the influence of the Yellow River on adjacent groundwater systems. The findings show that shallow groundwater in the Kaifeng section is weakly alkaline, dominated by