Understanding patients' degree of frailty is crucial for tailoring clinical care for older adults based on their physiologic reserve and health needs (“frailty-guided clinical care”). Two prerequisites for frailty-guided clinical care are: (1) access to frailty information at the point of care and (2) evidence to inform decisions based on frailty information. Recent advancements include web-based frailty assessment tools and their electronic health records integration for time-efficient, standardized assessments in clinical practice. Additionally, database frailty scores from administrative claims and electronic health records data enable scalable assessments and evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions across different frailty levels using real-world data. Given limited evidence from clinical trials, real-world database studies can complement trial results and help treatment decisions for individuals with frailty. This article, based on the Thomas and Catherine Yoshikawa Award lecture I gave at the American Geriatrics Society Annual Meeting in Long Beach, California, on May 5, 2023, outlines our group's contributions: (1) developing and integrating a frailty index calculator (Senior Health Calculator) into the electronic health records at an academic medical center; (2) developing a claims-based frailty index for Medicare claims; (3) applying this index to evaluate the effect of medical interventions for patients with and without frailty; and (4) efforts to disseminate frailty assessment tools through the launch of the eFrailty website and the forthcoming addition of the claims-based frailty index to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. This article concludes with future directions for frailty-guided clinical care.
Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.
Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).
Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all p < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, p < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, p < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, p < 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, p < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, p < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, p < 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.
Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.
Residents of assisted living facilities (ALF) transfer to a nursing home when they require a higher level of care, but limited research has examined risk factors for transfer to a nursing home. The aims of this study were to identify (1) baseline factors associated with transfer to a nursing home and (2) time-varying factors associated with transfer to a nursing home over 8 years, using a national dataset from the National Health Aging Trends Study (NHATS).
NHATS participants were included in this study if they: (1) resided in ALF from Round 1 (2011) through Round 8 (2018); (2) completed the sample person (SP) interview at baseline; (3) were admitted to ALF at age 65 years or older. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression to examine candidate predictors (difficulty with basic activities of daily living (ADL), chronic conditions, hospitalization, sleep disturbances, mental health, physical performance, self-reported health, participation in social and physical activity, and sociodemographic) associated with transfer to a nursing home. Employing backward elimination, we built parsimonious final models for analysis.
The analytic sample included 970 participants of whom 143 transferred to nursing homes over 8 years. Those who had a better physical performance at baseline (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.79–0.88) and were college educated (HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.36–0.92) demonstrated a significantly lower risk for transfer to a nursing home over 8 years. Residents who maintained physical activity (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37–0.86), better physical performance (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80–0.94), and difficulty with fewer basic ADLs (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.02–1.26) were at lower risk for transfer to a nursing home over 8 years.
Our findings can be used to identify older adults in ALFs at risk of transfer to a nursing home. Strategies to promote physical function and physical activity could avoid/delay the need to transfer. Helping older residents to age in place will have important health and economic benefits.
Although many healthcare settings have since returned to pre-pandemic levels of operation, long-term care (LTC) facilities have experienced extended and significant changes to operations, including unprecedented levels of short staffing and facility closures, that may have a detrimental effect on resident outcomes. This study assessed the pandemic's extended effect on outcomes for LTC residents, comparing outcomes 1 and 2 years after the start of the pandemic to pre-pandemic times, with special focus on residents with frailty and dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.
Using Medicare claims data from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022, we ran over-dispersed Poisson models to compare the monthly adjusted rates of emergency department use, hospitalization, and mortality among LTC residents, comparing residents with and without frailty and dually enrolled and non-dually enrolled residents.
Two years after the start of the pandemic, adjusted emergency department (ED) and hospitalization rates were lower and adjusted mortality rates were higher compared with pre-pandemic years for all examined subgroups. For example, compared with 2018–2019, 2022 ED visit rates for dually enrolled residents were 0.89 times lower, hospitalization rates were 0.87 times lower, and mortality rates were 1.17 higher; 2022 ED visit rates for frail residents were 0.85 times lower, hospitalization rates were 0.83 times lower, and mortality rates were 1.21 higher.
In 2022, emergency department and hospital utilization rates among long-term residents were lower than pre-pandemic levels and mortality rates were higher than pre-pandemic levels. These findings suggest that the pandemic has had an extended impact on outcomes for LTC residents.
Both age-associated hearing loss (AAHL) and peripheral neuropathy (PN) are common in older patients, and both are associated with impaired balance, falls, and premature mortality. The objectives of this study were to document the prevalence and severity of AAHL in older primary care patients, and to explore associations between AAHL, PN, balance, falls, and mortality.
We analyzed information obtained in 1999 from 793 primary care patients recruited from practices participating in the Oklahoma Longitudinal Assessment of the Health Outcomes of Mature Adults (OKLAHOMA) Studies. Available data included demographic and health information, history of falls and hospitalizations, audiometry, balance testing, examination of the peripheral nerves, 50 foot timed gait, and dates of death up to 22 calendar years and 8106 person-years of follow-up. Proportionate hazards (PH) and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to examine associations between AAHL, PN, balance, gait time, and mortality.
501 of the 793 participants (63%) had AAHL. Another 156 (20%) had low frequency and 32 (4%) had unilateral deficits. Those with moderate or severe AAHL and the 255 (32%) with PN had impaired balance (p < 0.0001), increased gait time (p = 0.0001), and reduced survival time (p < 0.0001). In the PH model, both AAHL and PN were associated with earlier mortality (H.Rs. [95% C.I.]: 1.36 [1.13–1.64] and 1.32 [1.10–1.59] respectively). The combination of moderate or severe AAHL and PN, present in 24% of participants, predicted earlier mortality than predicted by either deficit alone (O.R. [95% C.I.I] 1.55 [1.25–1.92]). In the SEM models, the impacts of both moderate or severe AAHL and PN on survival were mediated, in part, through loss of balance.
Hearing loss and PN, both common in older patients, appear to be independently and additively associated with premature mortality. Those associations may be mediated in part by impaired balance. The Mechanisms are likely multiple and complex.
Public health campaigns have often used persuasive techniques to promote healthy behaviors but the use of persuasion by doctors is controversial. We sought to examine older women's perspectives.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 community-dwelling older women from the Baltimore metropolitan area. We asked whether participants thought it was ethically appropriate for doctors to try to persuade patients and explored their rationales. We probed about commonly used persuasive techniques and two example decisional contexts—stopping mammograms and moving out of one's house after multiple falls. We used qualitative thematic analysis to code the transcripts and summarized results into major themes.
We found mixed views on the ethical appropriateness of persuasion (theme 1); supporters of persuasion were motivated by the potential benefit to patients' health, whereas opponents thought patients should be the ultimate decision-makers. Perspectives depended on the persuasive technique (theme 2), where emotional appeals elicited the most negative reactions while use of facts and patient stories were viewed more positively. Perspectives also varied by the decisional context (theme 3), where higher severity and certainty of harm influenced participants to be more accepting of persuasion. Participants suggested alternative communication approaches to persuasion (theme 4) that emphasized respect for patients.
Our findings suggest that the type of persuasive technique and the decisional context are important considerations in the ethical debate around the use of persuasion. Limiting the use of persuasion to high-stakes decisions and using facts and patient stories rather than emotional appeals are likely more acceptable.
Promoting options for aging in place (AIP) has broad appeal to policymakers and professionals providing services to persons living with dementia (PWD). However, the benefits or burdens of AIP likely vary among individuals and families. We sought to describe factors influencing decision-making to age in place versus seek a higher level of residential care for PWD.
A qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger mixed-methods study utilizing semi-structured interviews with PWD, family care partners, and dementia clinicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with constant comparison. Sample size was determined by thematic saturation within subgroups.
We conducted 74 interviews among 14 PWD, 36 care partners, and 24 clinicians. Preferences for AIP were driven by (1) desire to preserve independence, (2) a sense that the “best care” is delivered by loved ones and in a familiar environment, (3) distrust and fear of care facilities, and (4) caregiver guilt. PWD and care partners frequently considered moving from home as a “last resort” and wanted to avoid planning for future care needs. Many decisions to move were reactive and triggered by patient safety events, physical dependency, or the loss of caregiver. Proactive decision-making was facilitated by (1) prior experience witnessing the challenges of caring for a person with advanced dementia in the home; and (2) having substantial financial resources such that participants could seek major home adaptations or avoid “lower quality” institutions.
Decisions regarding care setting for PWD frequently do not feel like a choice and are made under imperfect conditions. Programs using AIP as an outcome measure should recognize the various patient-centered and non-patient-centered factors that influence such choices, and interventions should be designed to promote more informed and equitable decision-making for care setting in dementia.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：