首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society最新文献

英文 中文
Fool Me Once: A Case of Recurrent Delirium in the Setting of Buprenorphine Use 愚弄我一次:丁丙诺啡使用后复发性谵妄1例。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70227
Yasmeen Abdo, Camila S. Badell, Abeer Qasim, Eloy F. Ruiz

{"title":"Fool Me Once: A Case of Recurrent Delirium in the Setting of Buprenorphine Use","authors":"Yasmeen Abdo,&nbsp;Camila S. Badell,&nbsp;Abeer Qasim,&nbsp;Eloy F. Ruiz","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70227","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure>\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"302-304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145644014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning How Preoperative Communication Relates to Postoperative Experiences for Older Veterans Having Inguinal Hernia Surgery 学习术前沟通与老年退伍军人腹股沟疝手术术后经验的关系。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70216
Melissa A. Thornton, Elisa L. Marten, Nicole Lunardi, Don Mai, Cameron Macdonald, Jocelyn G. Baker, Ava Hitzeman, Celette Sugg Skinner, Cynthia J. Brown, Miles Berger, Simon Craddock Lee, C. Munro Cullum, Konstantinos I. Makris, Thai H. Pham, Aanand Naik, Victoria Tang, Courtney J. Balentine

Background

For older adults to decide whether inguinal hernia repair will meaningfully improve their lives, it is critical to (1) understand how the operation affects them and whether it enhances outcomes that matter to them, and (2) identify ways to improve how surgeons discuss the benefits of surgery and how they prepare older adults for postoperative recovery.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 Veterans ≥ 65 years old who had inguinal hernia repair at two high-volume Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Results

Participants were all men; their mean age was 73 years, 65% were White, and 33% were Black. Older adults felt that the surgical team provided excellent reassurance regarding the safety and efficacy of surgery but expressed a desire for improved listening during preoperative counseling and for clearer communication regarding the reality of postoperative recovery. Veterans reported a return to baseline physical and cognitive function between 2 days and 6 weeks after surgery, though two Veterans experienced significant short-term cognitive dysfunction. Those who reported dissatisfaction with preoperative communication were more likely to be surprised or concerned about postoperative symptoms.

Conclusions

Our study provides critical information on how hernia repair affects the lives of older adults, and this can be used to better prepare the patients for surgery and to help them decide whether surgery will meaningfully enhance their quality of life.

背景:对于老年人来说,决定腹股沟疝修补是否会有意义地改善他们的生活,至关重要的是:(1)了解手术如何影响他们,是否能提高对他们重要的结果,以及(2)确定如何改进外科医生讨论手术益处的方法,以及他们如何为老年人术后恢复做好准备。方法:我们对40名≥65岁在两家大容量退伍军人医院行腹股沟疝修补术的退伍军人进行半结构化访谈。结果:参与者均为男性;平均年龄73岁,白人占65%,黑人占33%。老年人认为手术团队对手术的安全性和有效性提供了很好的保证,但他们表示希望在术前咨询时更好地倾听,并就术后恢复的现实进行更清晰的沟通。据报道,退伍军人在手术后2天至6周内恢复了基本的身体和认知功能,尽管有两名退伍军人出现了明显的短期认知功能障碍。那些对术前沟通不满意的患者更可能对术后症状感到惊讶或担忧。结论:我们的研究提供了关于疝修补如何影响老年人生活的重要信息,这可以用来更好地为患者做手术准备,并帮助他们决定手术是否会有意义地提高他们的生活质量。
{"title":"Learning How Preoperative Communication Relates to Postoperative Experiences for Older Veterans Having Inguinal Hernia Surgery","authors":"Melissa A. Thornton,&nbsp;Elisa L. Marten,&nbsp;Nicole Lunardi,&nbsp;Don Mai,&nbsp;Cameron Macdonald,&nbsp;Jocelyn G. Baker,&nbsp;Ava Hitzeman,&nbsp;Celette Sugg Skinner,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Brown,&nbsp;Miles Berger,&nbsp;Simon Craddock Lee,&nbsp;C. Munro Cullum,&nbsp;Konstantinos I. Makris,&nbsp;Thai H. Pham,&nbsp;Aanand Naik,&nbsp;Victoria Tang,&nbsp;Courtney J. Balentine","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70216","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70216","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For older adults to decide whether inguinal hernia repair will meaningfully improve their lives, it is critical to (1) understand how the operation affects them and whether it enhances outcomes that matter to them, and (2) identify ways to improve how surgeons discuss the benefits of surgery and how they prepare older adults for postoperative recovery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 Veterans ≥ 65 years old who had inguinal hernia repair at two high-volume Veterans Affairs hospitals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants were all men; their mean age was 73 years, 65% were White, and 33% were Black. Older adults felt that the surgical team provided excellent reassurance regarding the safety and efficacy of surgery but expressed a desire for improved listening during preoperative counseling and for clearer communication regarding the reality of postoperative recovery. Veterans reported a return to baseline physical and cognitive function between 2 days and 6 weeks after surgery, though two Veterans experienced significant short-term cognitive dysfunction. Those who reported dissatisfaction with preoperative communication were more likely to be surprised or concerned about postoperative symptoms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study provides critical information on how hernia repair affects the lives of older adults, and this can be used to better prepare the patients for surgery and to help them decide whether surgery will meaningfully enhance their quality of life.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"177-185"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying Barriers and Motivators to Increase Surgical Clinical Trial Participation for Older Veterans 识别障碍和动机,以增加老年退伍军人外科临床试验的参与。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70218
Benjamin A. Y. Cher, Nicole Lunardi, Melissa Thornton, Ava Hitzeman, Jocelyn Baker, Cameron Macdonald, Celette Sugg Skinner, Cynthia J. Brown, Don Mai, Elisa L. Marten, Konstantinos Makris, Maria Luisa Machado Heredia, Miles Berger, C. Munro Cullum, Simon C. Lee, Thai H. Pham, Courtney J. Balentine

Background

Patients aged 65+ are underrepresented in surgical clinical trials, and few studies have explored the unique barriers that limit participation of older adults in surgical trials. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in surgical randomized trials among adults aged 65+.

Participants and Setting

Patients aged 65+ years having hernia surgery at two high-volume Veterans' Affairs hospitals.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in clinical trials. Interviews were analyzed with directed content analysis.

Results

We interviewed 40 Veterans aged 65+ years. The most frequently cited barriers to participation were logistical (e.g., needing to visit the hospital more frequently) and emotional (e.g., medical mistrust, fear of hospitals, and fear of bodily harm). COVID-19 pandemic-related misinformation was commonly cited by these participants as a justification for medical mistrust. The most frequently cited motivators to participate in trials were altruism, access to novel treatments, increased time with clinicians, and advancing scientific knowledge. Patients uncertain about participation were potentially persuadable by referencing the impact of the trial on their friends and family, or by increasing transparency around trial purpose and design. Notably, using virtual visits to minimize travel to the hospital was not regarded as a viable way to address logistical barriers.

Conclusions

Increasing the participation of older adults in surgical clinical trials will require a multi-factorial strategy that emphasizes communication of benefits to more than just the patient and includes deliberate planning to combat misperceptions and misinformation.

背景:65岁以上的患者在外科临床试验中的代表性不足,并且很少有研究探讨限制老年人参与外科试验的独特障碍。我们的目的是确定65岁以上成人参与外科随机试验的障碍和促进因素。参与者和环境:在两家大容量退伍军人事务医院接受疝气手术的65岁以上患者。方法:我们进行了半结构化访谈,以确定参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素。访谈采用定向内容分析进行分析。结果:我们采访了40名65岁以上的退伍军人。最常提到的参与障碍是后勤(例如,需要更频繁地去医院)和情感(例如,对医疗的不信任、对医院的恐惧和对身体伤害的恐惧)。这些参与者通常将与COVID-19大流行相关的错误信息作为医疗不信任的理由。参与试验最常见的动机是利他主义、获得新疗法、与临床医生相处时间的增加以及科学知识的进步。通过参考试验对其朋友和家人的影响,或通过增加试验目的和设计的透明度,可以潜在地说服不确定参与试验的患者。值得注意的是,利用虚拟访问来尽量减少到医院的旅行被认为不是解决后勤障碍的可行方法。结论:增加老年人参与外科临床试验将需要一个多因素的策略,强调益处的沟通,而不仅仅是患者,包括深思熟虑的计划,以消除误解和错误信息。
{"title":"Identifying Barriers and Motivators to Increase Surgical Clinical Trial Participation for Older Veterans","authors":"Benjamin A. Y. Cher,&nbsp;Nicole Lunardi,&nbsp;Melissa Thornton,&nbsp;Ava Hitzeman,&nbsp;Jocelyn Baker,&nbsp;Cameron Macdonald,&nbsp;Celette Sugg Skinner,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Brown,&nbsp;Don Mai,&nbsp;Elisa L. Marten,&nbsp;Konstantinos Makris,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Machado Heredia,&nbsp;Miles Berger,&nbsp;C. Munro Cullum,&nbsp;Simon C. Lee,&nbsp;Thai H. Pham,&nbsp;Courtney J. Balentine","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70218","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70218","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients aged 65+ are underrepresented in surgical clinical trials, and few studies have explored the unique barriers that limit participation of older adults in surgical trials. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in surgical randomized trials among adults aged 65+.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Participants and Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients aged 65+ years having hernia surgery at two high-volume Veterans' Affairs hospitals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in clinical trials. Interviews were analyzed with directed content analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We interviewed 40 Veterans aged 65+ years. The most frequently cited barriers to participation were logistical (e.g., needing to visit the hospital more frequently) and emotional (e.g., medical mistrust, fear of hospitals, and fear of bodily harm). COVID-19 pandemic-related misinformation was commonly cited by these participants as a justification for medical mistrust. The most frequently cited motivators to participate in trials were altruism, access to novel treatments, increased time with clinicians, and advancing scientific knowledge. Patients uncertain about participation were potentially persuadable by referencing the impact of the trial on their friends and family, or by increasing transparency around trial purpose and design. Notably, using virtual visits to minimize travel to the hospital was not regarded as a viable way to address logistical barriers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Increasing the participation of older adults in surgical clinical trials will require a multi-factorial strategy that emphasizes communication of benefits to more than just the patient and includes deliberate planning to combat misperceptions and misinformation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145608019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cover 封面
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70194
Samir K. Shah, Lingwei Xiang, Rachel R. Adler, Clancy J. Clark, Zara Cooper, Emily Finlayson, Susan L. Mitchell, Dae Hyun Kim, Kueiyu Joshua Lin, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Joel S. Weissman

Cover caption: Outcomes of high-risk surgery in patients living with ADRD compared to those without. See the related article by Shah et al., pages 3434–3443.

封面说明:与没有ADRD的患者相比,患有ADRD的高危手术的结果。参见Shah等人的相关文章,第3434-3443页。
{"title":"Cover","authors":"Samir K. Shah,&nbsp;Lingwei Xiang,&nbsp;Rachel R. Adler,&nbsp;Clancy J. Clark,&nbsp;Zara Cooper,&nbsp;Emily Finlayson,&nbsp;Susan L. Mitchell,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Kueiyu Joshua Lin,&nbsp;Stuart R. Lipsitz,&nbsp;Joel S. Weissman","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cover caption</b>: Outcomes of high-risk surgery in patients living with ADRD compared to those without. See the related article by Shah et al., pages 3434–3443.\u0000\u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure></p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70194","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145585130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Playlist Prescriptions 播放列表的处方。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70214
Sophia J. Ruser, Jody Sharninghausen
{"title":"Playlist Prescriptions","authors":"Sophia J. Ruser,&nbsp;Jody Sharninghausen","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70214","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70214","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"249-251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145608031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Discharge to Institutional Post-Acute Care After Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States and Canada 美国和加拿大全关节置换术后住院的趋势。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70210
Chih-Ying Li, Yong-Fang Kuo, Md Ibrahim Tahashilder, Samantha S. M. Drover, Fangyun Wu, Bruce Landon, Bheeshma Ravi, Peter Cram

Background

Recent payment reforms in the United States have been credited with reducing the use of institutional post-acute care (PAC) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). This dual-country study of Canada and the United States compares longitudinal trends in discharge to institutional PAC after primary TKA or THA.

Methods

We conducted serial cross-sectional analyses to compare discharge to institutional PAC trends among adults aged ≥ 66 years undergoing primary TKA or THA in the United States and Canada from 2013 to 2019. Patient-level data were obtained from population-based Medicare claims in the United States and analogous datasets in Ontario. Discharge trends were assessed using standardized differences and linear regression models to evaluate relative changes over time.

Results

Patients receiving TKA (2,308,001) and THA (1,234,149) in the United States and Ontario (106,721 and 53,371, respectively) were similar in age (73–74 years) and sex (~60% female). The absolute reduction in institutional PAC discharge over time for TKA was greater in the United States (slope = −3.59) than in Canada (slope = −0.53) (p < 0.0001), but relative reductions (slope = −8.78 in the United States, slope = −6.99 in Canada) were statistically similar (p = 0.08). THA showed a similar trend of absolute reductions; however, the relative reduction trend in the United States (slope = −9.98) was steeper than in Canada (slope = −6.46) (p = 0.0009).

Conclusions

The US payment reforms from 2013 to 2019 were associated with a greater impact on reducing institutional PAC utilization for THA than for TKA.

背景:美国最近的支付改革被认为减少了全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)后机构急性期后护理(PAC)的使用。这项对加拿大和美国的双重研究比较了原发性TKA或THA后机构PAC的纵向趋势。方法:我们进行了系列横断面分析,比较2013年至2019年美国和加拿大接受原发性TKA或THA的≥66岁成人的机构PAC出院趋势。患者水平的数据来自美国基于人群的医疗保险索赔和安大略省的类似数据集。使用标准化差异和线性回归模型评估排放趋势,以评估随时间的相对变化。结果:美国和安大略省接受TKA(2,308,001)和THA(1,234,149)的患者(分别为106,721和53,371)在年龄(73-74岁)和性别(约60%为女性)方面相似。随着时间的推移,美国TKA机构PAC排放量的绝对减少量(斜率= -3.59)大于加拿大(斜率= -0.53)(p结论:2013年至2019年美国支付改革对THA机构PAC利用率的降低影响大于TKA。
{"title":"Trends in Discharge to Institutional Post-Acute Care After Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States and Canada","authors":"Chih-Ying Li,&nbsp;Yong-Fang Kuo,&nbsp;Md Ibrahim Tahashilder,&nbsp;Samantha S. M. Drover,&nbsp;Fangyun Wu,&nbsp;Bruce Landon,&nbsp;Bheeshma Ravi,&nbsp;Peter Cram","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70210","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70210","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Recent payment reforms in the United States have been credited with reducing the use of institutional post-acute care (PAC) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). This dual-country study of Canada and the United States compares longitudinal trends in discharge to institutional PAC after primary TKA or THA.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted serial cross-sectional analyses to compare discharge to institutional PAC trends among adults aged ≥ 66 years undergoing primary TKA or THA in the United States and Canada from 2013 to 2019. Patient-level data were obtained from population-based Medicare claims in the United States and analogous datasets in Ontario. Discharge trends were assessed using standardized differences and linear regression models to evaluate relative changes over time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients receiving TKA (2,308,001) and THA (1,234,149) in the United States and Ontario (106,721 and 53,371, respectively) were similar in age (73–74 years) and sex (~60% female). The absolute reduction in institutional PAC discharge over time for TKA was greater in the United States (slope = −3.59) than in Canada (slope = −0.53) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), but relative reductions (slope = −8.78 in the United States, slope = −6.99 in Canada) were statistically similar (<i>p</i> = 0.08). THA showed a similar trend of absolute reductions; however, the relative reduction trend in the United States (slope = −9.98) was steeper than in Canada (slope = −6.46) (<i>p</i> = 0.0009).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The US payment reforms from 2013 to 2019 were associated with a greater impact on reducing institutional PAC utilization for THA than for TKA.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 2","pages":"532-539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145590639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kevin's Comb and Becky's Braids: A Model for Clinical Reasoning in Geriatric Medicine 凯文的梳子和贝基的辫子:老年医学的临床推理模型。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70208
Rebecca J. Stetzer, Kevin Costello
{"title":"Kevin's Comb and Becky's Braids: A Model for Clinical Reasoning in Geriatric Medicine","authors":"Rebecca J. Stetzer,&nbsp;Kevin Costello","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70208","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70208","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 2","pages":"619-622"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145582859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Where Do Older Pedestrians Experience a Risk of Being Killed in a Motor Vehicle Crash? 老年行人在什么地方有车祸死亡的风险?
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70198
Kathryn G. Burford, Kathryn M. Neckerman, James W. Quinn, Michael D. M. Bader, Gina S. Lovasi, Stephen J. Mooney, Nicole G. Itzkowitz, Dirk Kinsey, Andrew G. Rundle

Background

Population-level interventions are needed to address the overrepresentation of older pedestrians in deaths from traffic crashes. Data are absent on whether specific publicly licensed or public establishments are associated with increased risk to older pedestrians, despite their attractiveness as partners for government efforts. We conducted a nationwide location-based case–control study to examine the associations between publicly licensed or public establishments of daily living for older adults and the location of pedestrian fatalities in motor vehicle crashes. We also assessed etiological heterogeneity by pedestrian age and time of day.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2018, there were 10,529 locations where a pedestrian was killed (case location) across the 380 Metropolitan Statistical Areas of the conterminous United States. For each case location two matched control locations were selected. The density of residential living facilities and walkable destinations for older adults was measured within a 1-km radial buffer of each location. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression models, adjusting for matching factors, neighborhood composition and walkability metrics.

Results

There was a dose–response relationship between the density of older adult walkable destinations (hospitals, health care delivery venues, health services, pharmacies, senior centers, libraries, community centers) and location case–control status by age group of the fatally struck pedestrian. The strongest pattern was observed for the 65+ age group: Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.26–2.06) for Q2; AOR = 2.58 for Q3 (95% CI: 1.99–3.34); and AOR = 3.44 for Q4 (95% CI = 2.61–4.52). Only among the age 50–64 and 65+ age groups was the highest category of density of residential facilities (assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, continuing care retirement communities) associated with fatality location case–control status.

Conclusions

Future research might explore whether prioritizing traffic safety programs near destinations where older adults commonly frequent, such as medical centers, prevents older adult pedestrian fatalities.

背景:需要采取人口层面的干预措施来解决交通事故死亡中老年行人比例过高的问题。尽管特定的公共许可或公共场所作为政府努力的合作伙伴很有吸引力,但它们是否与老年行人的风险增加有关,尚无数据。我们进行了一项全国性的基于地点的病例对照研究,以检查老年人公共许可或公共日常生活场所与机动车碰撞中行人死亡地点之间的关系。我们还评估了不同行人年龄和时间的病因异质性。方法:在2017年至2018年期间,在美国相邻的380个大都市统计区内,有10,529个地点发生了行人死亡(病例位置)。对于每个病例位置,选择两个匹配的对照位置。在每个地点1公里的径向缓冲区内测量老年人居住生活设施和步行目的地的密度。数据分析使用条件逻辑回归模型,调整匹配因素,社区组成和步行指标。结果:老年人步行目的地(医院、医疗服务场所、卫生服务机构、药店、老年中心、图书馆、社区中心)的密度与死亡行人所在地区按年龄组的病例对照状况存在剂量-反应关系。在65岁以上年龄组中观察到最强的模式:Q2的调整优势比(AOR) = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.26-2.06);Q3的AOR = 2.58 (95% CI: 1.99-3.34);Q4的AOR = 3.44 (95% CI = 2.61 ~ 4.52)。只有在50-64岁和65岁以上年龄组中,与死亡地点病例控制状况相关的居住设施(辅助生活设施、熟练护理设施、持续护理退休社区)密度类别最高。结论:未来的研究可能会探索是否优先考虑老年人经常光顾的目的地附近的交通安全计划,如医疗中心,防止老年人行人死亡。
{"title":"Where Do Older Pedestrians Experience a Risk of Being Killed in a Motor Vehicle Crash?","authors":"Kathryn G. Burford,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Neckerman,&nbsp;James W. Quinn,&nbsp;Michael D. M. Bader,&nbsp;Gina S. Lovasi,&nbsp;Stephen J. Mooney,&nbsp;Nicole G. Itzkowitz,&nbsp;Dirk Kinsey,&nbsp;Andrew G. Rundle","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70198","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70198","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Population-level interventions are needed to address the overrepresentation of older pedestrians in deaths from traffic crashes. Data are absent on whether specific publicly licensed or public establishments are associated with increased risk to older pedestrians, despite their attractiveness as partners for government efforts. We conducted a nationwide location-based case–control study to examine the associations between publicly licensed or public establishments of daily living for older adults and the location of pedestrian fatalities in motor vehicle crashes. We also assessed etiological heterogeneity by pedestrian age and time of day.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Between 2017 and 2018, there were 10,529 locations where a pedestrian was killed (case location) across the 380 Metropolitan Statistical Areas of the conterminous United States. For each case location two matched control locations were selected. The density of residential living facilities and walkable destinations for older adults was measured within a 1-km radial buffer of each location. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression models, adjusting for matching factors, neighborhood composition and walkability metrics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There was a dose–response relationship between the density of older adult walkable destinations (hospitals, health care delivery venues, health services, pharmacies, senior centers, libraries, community centers) and location case–control status by age group of the fatally struck pedestrian. The strongest pattern was observed for the 65+ age group: Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.26–2.06) for Q2; AOR = 2.58 for Q3 (95% CI: 1.99–3.34); and AOR = 3.44 for Q4 (95% CI = 2.61–4.52). Only among the age 50–64 and 65+ age groups was the highest category of density of residential facilities (assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, continuing care retirement communities) associated with fatality location case–control status.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Future research might explore whether prioritizing traffic safety programs near destinations where older adults commonly frequent, such as medical centers, prevents older adult pedestrian fatalities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"132-142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70198","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Changing Landscape of the Providers of Home-Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare 传统医疗保险中家庭医疗服务提供者的变化。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70203
Amresh D. Hanchate, Mia Yang, Stephanie K. Nothelle, Lindsey Abdelfattah, Michael P. Bancks, Emilie D. Duchesneau, Zhang Zhang, Bruce Kinosian

Background

As more older adults become homebound, home-based medical care (HBMC) has increased, but little is known about the HBMC workforce. This study analyzes national data on the size and structural features of HBMC providers from 2016 to 2022.

Methods

We analyzed annual primary care data for all traditional Medicare enrollees, classifying visits as HBMC (private residence or assisted living facility [ALF]) or non-HBMC (office or telemedicine). We evaluated trends in HBMC providers and visits by HBMC practice exclusivity (only-HBMC or both HBMC and non-HBMC), care setting (private residence, ALF), provider type (physician, nurse practitioner [NP], physician assistant [PA]), and visit volume. We assessed geographic variation in HBMC's share of primary care and payment differences between HBMC and non-HBMC services.

Results

In 2022, 16,125 of 304,326 (5%) primary care clinicians delivered 5.6 million HBMC visits, with most visits (66%) in ALFs. From 2016 to 2022, HBMC providers increased by 40% and visits by 29%. The proportion of only-HBMC providers rose from 50.2% to 61.7%, whereas providers with volume > 1000 visits/year fell from 46.8% to 38.9%. The increase in providers was higher in private residences (49%) than ALFs (33%), though average provider volume decreased in private residences (−24%) and rose in ALFs (7%). NPs among HBMC providers increased from 42.2% to 63.0%, PAs from 6.6% to 8.2%, and physicians dropped from 51.3% to 28.9%. HBMC's share of all visits increased from 3.9% to 5.4%, driven more by ALF visits. Non-HBMC service payments grew faster than those for HBMC services.

Conclusions

Against the backdrop of an expanding HBMC workforce and rising visit volumes from 2016 to 2022, our findings highlight significant shifts in the structural composition of providers. These shifts emphasize the need for ongoing research to address their implications for access, quality, and outcomes in homebound older adults.

背景:随着越来越多的老年人居家,以家庭为基础的医疗保健(HBMC)有所增加,但对HBMC的劳动力知之甚少。本研究分析了2016 - 2022年全国HBMC供应商的规模和结构特征数据。方法:我们分析了所有传统医疗保险参保人的年度初级保健数据,将就诊分为HBMC(私人住宅或辅助生活设施[ALF])和非HBMC(办公室或远程医疗)。我们通过HBMC专门性(仅HBMC或HBMC和非HBMC)、护理环境(私人住宅、ALF)、提供者类型(医生、执业护士[NP]、医师助理[PA])和访问量评估了HBMC提供者和访问量的趋势。我们评估了HBMC在初级保健中所占份额的地理差异,以及HBMC和非HBMC服务之间的支付差异。结果:2022年,304,326名初级保健临床医生中,有16,125名(5%)提供了560万次HBMC就诊,其中大多数就诊(66%)是ALFs。从2016年到2022年,HBMC供应商增加了40%,访问量增加了29%。只有hbmc的医疗机构的比例从50.2%上升到61.7%,而年访问量为100万人次的医疗机构的比例从46.8%下降到38.9%。私人院舍的服务提供者增加(49%)高于alf(33%),尽管私人院舍的平均服务提供者数量减少(-24%),而alf的平均服务提供者数量增加(7%)。HBMC提供者的NPs从42.2%增加到63.0%,pa从6.6%增加到8.2%,医生从51.3%下降到28.9%。HBMC的总访问量份额从3.9%上升到5.4%,主要是由ALF的访问量推动的。非HBMC服务支付增速快于HBMC服务。结论:在2016年至2022年HBMC劳动力不断扩大和访问量不断增加的背景下,我们的研究结果突出了供应商结构构成的重大变化。这些转变强调需要进行持续的研究,以解决其对居家老年人的可及性、质量和结果的影响。
{"title":"The Changing Landscape of the Providers of Home-Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare","authors":"Amresh D. Hanchate,&nbsp;Mia Yang,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Nothelle,&nbsp;Lindsey Abdelfattah,&nbsp;Michael P. Bancks,&nbsp;Emilie D. Duchesneau,&nbsp;Zhang Zhang,&nbsp;Bruce Kinosian","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70203","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As more older adults become homebound, home-based medical care (HBMC) has increased, but little is known about the HBMC workforce. This study analyzes national data on the size and structural features of HBMC providers from 2016 to 2022.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We analyzed annual primary care data for all traditional Medicare enrollees, classifying visits as HBMC (private residence or assisted living facility [ALF]) or non-HBMC (office or telemedicine). We evaluated trends in HBMC providers and visits by HBMC practice exclusivity (only-HBMC or both HBMC and non-HBMC), care setting (private residence, ALF), provider type (physician, nurse practitioner [NP], physician assistant [PA]), and visit volume. We assessed geographic variation in HBMC's share of primary care and payment differences between HBMC and non-HBMC services.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In 2022, 16,125 of 304,326 (5%) primary care clinicians delivered 5.6 million HBMC visits, with most visits (66%) in ALFs. From 2016 to 2022, HBMC providers increased by 40% and visits by 29%. The proportion of only-HBMC providers rose from 50.2% to 61.7%, whereas providers with volume &gt; 1000 visits/year fell from 46.8% to 38.9%. The increase in providers was higher in private residences (49%) than ALFs (33%), though average provider volume decreased in private residences (−24%) and rose in ALFs (7%). NPs among HBMC providers increased from 42.2% to 63.0%, PAs from 6.6% to 8.2%, and physicians dropped from 51.3% to 28.9%. HBMC's share of all visits increased from 3.9% to 5.4%, driven more by ALF visits. Non-HBMC service payments grew faster than those for HBMC services.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Against the backdrop of an expanding HBMC workforce and rising visit volumes from 2016 to 2022, our findings highlight significant shifts in the structural composition of providers. These shifts emphasize the need for ongoing research to address their implications for access, quality, and outcomes in homebound older adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70203","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medicare Advantage Enrollment in Nursing Homes: 2010–2023 2010-2023年,医疗保险优势在养老院登记。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70206
Hyunkyung Yun, Momotazur Rahman, David J. Meyers, Brian E. McGarry, Vincent Mor, Hye-Young Jung, Cyrus Kosar

Background

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans now cover 54% of all Medicare beneficiaries. However, MA is understudied in the nursing home population. We analyzed MA enrollment trends and resident and facility characteristics from 2010 through 2023.

Methods

We calculated the point prevalence of MA enrollment for long-stay nursing home residents, short-stay residents, and all other Medicare beneficiaries from 2010 to 2023, and compared variation in MA growth at the state level between long-stay residents and the general Medicare population. We analyzed how the composition of Traditional Medicare- and MA-enrolled long-stay residents changed over time, changes in special needs plan (SNP) enrollment, and nursing home quality for MA enrollees. We also tracked monthly MA enrollment rates among nursing home residents before and after they became long-stay.

Results

MA enrollment among long-stay residents increased from 12.9% in 2010 to 36.5% in 2023, a 183% increase, outpacing the growth rate among the overall Medicare population. There was substantial geographic variation in MA growth between long-stay residents and others across states. Enrollment in Institutional SNPs grew substantially, accounting for about 35% of MA enrollment among long-stay residents. Dual-Eligible SNP enrollment also accounted for a substantial proportion among MA long-stay residents, ranging between 12% and 20% across years. Long-stay residents covered by Traditional Medicare and MA showed comparable clinical characteristics and had similar shares residing in high-quality nursing homes. Disenrollment from MA sharply increased as beneficiaries entered nursing homes for long-term care.

Conclusions

The substantial growth in MA enrollment among long-stay nursing home residents, coupled with the notable geographic variation and disenrollment, underscores the importance of recognizing that not all beneficiary groups experience MA in the same way. Targeted monitoring is needed to ensure that MA plans adequately address the care needs of this high-risk population.

背景:医疗保险优势(MA)计划现在覆盖了所有医疗保险受益人的54%。然而,MA在养老院人群中的研究不足。我们分析了从2010年到2023年的MA入学趋势以及居民和设施特征。方法:我们计算了2010年至2023年长期住院养老院居民、短期住院居民和所有其他医疗保险受益人的MA登记点患病率,并比较了长期住院居民和一般医疗保险人群在州一级MA增长的变化。我们分析了传统医疗保险和MA登记的长期居民的组成如何随着时间的推移而变化,特殊需要计划(SNP)登记的变化,以及MA登记人的养老院质量。我们还跟踪了养老院居民在成为长期住院者之前和之后的每月MA入学率。结果:长期居住居民的MA入学率从2010年的12.9%增加到2023年的36.5%,增长了183%,超过了总体医疗保险人口的增长率。长期居住居民和各州其他居民之间的MA增长存在显著的地理差异。机构snp的入学率大幅增长,约占长期居住居民MA入学率的35%。双重符合条件的SNP登记在马萨诸塞州长期居民中也占很大比例,多年来的比例在12%到20%之间。传统医疗保险和MA覆盖的长期居民表现出相似的临床特征,居住在高质量养老院的比例相似。随着受益人进入养老院接受长期护理,从MA退出的人数急剧增加。结论:长期居住的养老院居民MA登记人数的大幅增长,加上显著的地理差异和退出,强调了认识到并非所有受益群体都以相同的方式经历MA的重要性。需要进行有针对性的监测,以确保MA计划充分满足这一高危人群的护理需求。
{"title":"Medicare Advantage Enrollment in Nursing Homes: 2010–2023","authors":"Hyunkyung Yun,&nbsp;Momotazur Rahman,&nbsp;David J. Meyers,&nbsp;Brian E. McGarry,&nbsp;Vincent Mor,&nbsp;Hye-Young Jung,&nbsp;Cyrus Kosar","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70206","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70206","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Medicare Advantage (MA) plans now cover 54% of all Medicare beneficiaries. However, MA is understudied in the nursing home population. We analyzed MA enrollment trends and resident and facility characteristics from 2010 through 2023.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We calculated the point prevalence of MA enrollment for long-stay nursing home residents, short-stay residents, and all other Medicare beneficiaries from 2010 to 2023, and compared variation in MA growth at the state level between long-stay residents and the general Medicare population. We analyzed how the composition of Traditional Medicare- and MA-enrolled long-stay residents changed over time, changes in special needs plan (SNP) enrollment, and nursing home quality for MA enrollees. We also tracked monthly MA enrollment rates among nursing home residents before and after they became long-stay.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>MA enrollment among long-stay residents increased from 12.9% in 2010 to 36.5% in 2023, a 183% increase, outpacing the growth rate among the overall Medicare population. There was substantial geographic variation in MA growth between long-stay residents and others across states. Enrollment in Institutional SNPs grew substantially, accounting for about 35% of MA enrollment among long-stay residents. Dual-Eligible SNP enrollment also accounted for a substantial proportion among MA long-stay residents, ranging between 12% and 20% across years. Long-stay residents covered by Traditional Medicare and MA showed comparable clinical characteristics and had similar shares residing in high-quality nursing homes. Disenrollment from MA sharply increased as beneficiaries entered nursing homes for long-term care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The substantial growth in MA enrollment among long-stay nursing home residents, coupled with the notable geographic variation and disenrollment, underscores the importance of recognizing that not all beneficiary groups experience MA in the same way. Targeted monitoring is needed to ensure that MA plans adequately address the care needs of this high-risk population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 2","pages":"516-521"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1