首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publication. 人工智能与科学出版。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00006
Michael S Kavic, Raymond J Lanzafame
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publication.","authors":"Michael S Kavic, Raymond J Lanzafame","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00006","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Experience with the Senhance Surgical System in Bariatric Surgery. 减肥手术中使用 Senhance 手术系统的早期经验。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00031
Tuan Tran, Francisco Irizarry, Shreya Gunda, Denise Danos, Michael Cook

Background and objectives: Robotic-assisted surgery advancements have paralleled growing bariatric surgery demands. The Senhance robotic platform offers an alternative to the da Vinci surgical system but there are limited studies evaluating the Senhance system in bariatric surgery. This study aims to review a single surgeon's experience comparing outcomes between traditional laparoscopic and Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy.

Materials and methods: All sleeve gastrectomies performed laparoscopically, Senhance-assisted, or da Vinci-assisted by a single surgeon at an academic center from January 2019 to July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes and quality measures were 30-day complications, operative times and length of stay.

Results: A total of 268 patients, including 162 laparoscopic, 92 Senhance, and 14 da Vinci cases, were included. Operative times were significantly longer with Senhance (115.7 min) and da Vinci (122.7 min), compared to laparoscopic (94.8 min, P < .0001). Length of stay (measured in days) was significantly longer in the Senhance (1.8) and da Vinci (2.2) groups compared to laparoscopic cases (1.5, P < .0001). These differences remained significant after controlling for age, sex and body mass index. 30-day complication rates were 8.7% (n = 8) in the Senhance group, 7.1% (n = 1) in the da Vinci group and 2.5% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic group (P = .0567).

Conclusion: Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy is safe in bariatric surgery and comparable to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to 30-day complications.

背景和目的:随着减肥手术需求的增长,机器人辅助手术也在不断进步。Senhance 机器人平台提供了达芬奇手术系统的替代方案,但评估 Senhance 系统在减肥手术中应用的研究还很有限。本研究旨在回顾一位外科医生的经验,比较传统腹腔镜和Senhance辅助袖状胃切除术的效果:回顾性审查了一个学术中心的一名外科医生在2019年1月至2021年7月期间通过腹腔镜、Senhance辅助或达芬奇辅助实施的所有袖状胃切除术。主要结果和质量指标为30天并发症、手术时间和住院时间:共纳入268例患者,包括162例腹腔镜手术、92例Senhance手术和14例达芬奇手术。与腹腔镜手术(94.8分钟,P P = .0567)相比,Senhance手术(115.7分钟)和达芬奇手术(122.7分钟)的手术时间明显更长:结论:Senhance辅助袖状胃切除术在减肥手术中是安全的,在30天并发症方面与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术相当。
{"title":"Early Experience with the Senhance Surgical System in Bariatric Surgery.","authors":"Tuan Tran, Francisco Irizarry, Shreya Gunda, Denise Danos, Michael Cook","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2023.00031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic-assisted surgery advancements have paralleled growing bariatric surgery demands. The Senhance robotic platform offers an alternative to the da Vinci surgical system but there are limited studies evaluating the Senhance system in bariatric surgery. This study aims to review a single surgeon's experience comparing outcomes between traditional laparoscopic and Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All sleeve gastrectomies performed laparoscopically, Senhance-assisted, or da Vinci-assisted by a single surgeon at an academic center from January 2019 to July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes and quality measures were 30-day complications, operative times and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 268 patients, including 162 laparoscopic, 92 Senhance, and 14 da Vinci cases, were included. Operative times were significantly longer with Senhance (115.7 min) and da Vinci (122.7 min), compared to laparoscopic (94.8 min, <i>P</i> < .0001). Length of stay (measured in days) was significantly longer in the Senhance (1.8) and da Vinci (2.2) groups compared to laparoscopic cases (1.5, <i>P</i> < .0001). These differences remained significant after controlling for age, sex and body mass index. 30-day complication rates were 8.7% (n = 8) in the Senhance group, 7.1% (n = 1) in the da Vinci group and 2.5% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic group (<i>P</i> = .0567).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy is safe in bariatric surgery and comparable to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to 30-day complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bilateral Spigelian Hernias Robotic Repair: A Novel Approach to a Rare Surgical Entity. 双侧斯皮格疝机器人修复术:罕见手术实体的新方法。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00055
Jaime A Aponte-Ortiz, Isabel Mayorga Pérez, Luis Alamo Irizarry, Josean M Rosado Rivera, Jose E Romero Gines, Jorge Pelet-Mejías

Spigelian hernias are an uncommon protrusion defect noted between the rectus abdominis and the transversus abdominis muscles, at the semilunar line, with a low incidence of approximately 0.12% to 2% of all ventral hernias. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral cases is noted to be even lower in the general population. They are associated with bowel incarceration and strangulation; hence surgical repair is indicated. Therapeutic alternatives for Spigelian hernias include open repair, however laparoscopic repair stands as the standard of care in these cases. Feasible and successful robotic repair has been reported, with associated advantages in terms of visualization and surgical instrument dexterity. We present the first ever reported cases of bilateral Spigelian hernias repaired using robotic approach. Two female Puerto Rican patients referred to our institution complaining of abdominal pain, where imaging studies found bilateral Spigelian hernias. In both cases, a transabdominal preperitoneal repair was performed using the Da Vinci Surgical System. Both patients were discharged home tolerating oral intake with adequate wound healing. On follow up visits, patients denied abdominal discomfort and had adequate wound healing. Robotic surgery for Spigelian hernias poses an advantage over laparoscopic repair as improved visualization, mobility, and precision in movements allow for more gentle tissue manipulation. Furthermore, this is the first evidence of safe and effective repair in the uncommon entity of bilateral cases, providing a newer alternative in the setting of such presentation.

腹股沟疝是一种不常见的突出缺陷,位于腹直肌和腹横肌之间的半月线处,发病率较低,约占所有腹股沟疝的 0.12% 至 2%。此外,在普通人群中,双侧病例的发病率更低。腹股沟疝与肠嵌顿和绞窄有关,因此需要进行手术修补。Spigelian疝气的治疗方法包括开腹修补术,但腹腔镜修补术是此类病例的标准治疗方法。有报道称机器人修复术是可行且成功的,在可视化和手术器械灵巧性方面具有相关优势。我们首次报道了使用机器人方法修复双侧斯皮格疝的病例。两名波多黎各女性患者因腹痛转诊至我院,影像学检查发现她们患有双侧斯皮格疝。我们使用达芬奇手术系统对这两名患者进行了经腹腹膜前修补术。两名患者出院回家后都能耐受口服药物,伤口也充分愈合。在随访中,患者否认腹部不适,伤口也充分愈合。与腹腔镜修复术相比,机器人手术治疗斯皮格疝更具优势,因为机器人手术的可视性、移动性和动作精确性都有所提高,可以更轻柔地操作组织。此外,这也是首次有证据表明,双侧病例的修复手术安全有效,为此类病例提供了新的选择。
{"title":"Bilateral Spigelian Hernias Robotic Repair: A Novel Approach to a Rare Surgical Entity.","authors":"Jaime A Aponte-Ortiz, Isabel Mayorga Pérez, Luis Alamo Irizarry, Josean M Rosado Rivera, Jose E Romero Gines, Jorge Pelet-Mejías","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00055","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spigelian hernias are an uncommon protrusion defect noted between the rectus abdominis and the transversus abdominis muscles, at the semilunar line, with a low incidence of approximately 0.12% to 2% of all ventral hernias. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral cases is noted to be even lower in the general population. They are associated with bowel incarceration and strangulation; hence surgical repair is indicated. Therapeutic alternatives for Spigelian hernias include open repair, however laparoscopic repair stands as the standard of care in these cases. Feasible and successful robotic repair has been reported, with associated advantages in terms of visualization and surgical instrument dexterity. We present the first ever reported cases of bilateral Spigelian hernias repaired using robotic approach. Two female Puerto Rican patients referred to our institution complaining of abdominal pain, where imaging studies found bilateral Spigelian hernias. In both cases, a transabdominal preperitoneal repair was performed using the Da Vinci Surgical System. Both patients were discharged home tolerating oral intake with adequate wound healing. On follow up visits, patients denied abdominal discomfort and had adequate wound healing. Robotic surgery for Spigelian hernias poses an advantage over laparoscopic repair as improved visualization, mobility, and precision in movements allow for more gentle tissue manipulation. Furthermore, this is the first evidence of safe and effective repair in the uncommon entity of bilateral cases, providing a newer alternative in the setting of such presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984373/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Slim-Mesh" Technique for Diastasis Recti Abdominis, Including Obesity-Related Cases. "纤网 "技术治疗腹肌松弛症,包括与肥胖有关的病例。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00003
Silvio Alen Canton

Background and objective: We operated on a series of mostly obese patients with diastasis recti abdominis using the "Slim-Mesh" technique to repair/reinforce the diastasis and linea alba/recti muscles without plicating and traumatizing them. Additional objectives were to decrease operation time and intra- and postoperative complications.

Methods: We considered T1 cases diastasis after pregnancy and T2 cases obesity (BMI ≥ 30 mg/kg2); D1, D2, and D3 when the diastasis measured 2-3, 3-5, and ≥ 5 cm, respectively; H0 and H1 without and concomitant umbilical and/or epigastric hernia, respectively. At our Department, between May 2010 and November 2022, 47 patients with diastasis recti were operated on with the "Slim-Mesh" technique to reinforce/repair the traumatized linea alba/recti muscles, without plicating them. This was a prospective (83%)-retrospective study.

Results: We studied 23 males and 24 females. Mean age and BMI was 58 years and 29 kg/m2, respectively. Groups D1, D2, and D3 comprised 6, 23 and 18 patients, respectively; groups T1, T2, H0 and H1 comprised 22, 25, 13 and 34 patients, respectively. Mean operation time for all cases was 100 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 days and follow-up time was 5 years. We had 6 late postoperative complications: 3 hernia recurrences and 3 trocar site hernias.

Conclusion: Considering the lack of agreement on the best surgery for diastasis recti abdominis repair, in our experience the "Slim-Mesh" technique is a valid, safe and easy-to-reproduce way to save, repair and reinforce linea alba/recti muscles in diastasis recti patients, including the obese population (53%).

背景和目的:我们使用 "超薄网 "技术为一系列腹部直肌松弛的肥胖患者进行了手术,在不对腹部直肌和白线/直肌进行钢板固定和创伤的情况下修复/加固了松弛的腹部直肌。其他目标是缩短手术时间,减少术中和术后并发症:方法:我们将妊娠后腹膜膨出视为 T1,肥胖(体重指数≥30 mg/kg2)视为 T2;腹膜膨出分别为 2-3、3-5 和≥5 cm 时视为 D1、D2 和 D3;无脐疝和/或上腹部疝的患者分别视为 H0 和 H1,合并脐疝和/或上腹部疝的患者视为 H1 和 H1。在 2010 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间,我科采用 "超薄网 "技术为 47 名直肠松弛症患者进行了手术,以加固/修复受创的白线/直肠肌肉,而不对其进行钢板固定。这是一项前瞻性(83%)-回顾性研究:我们研究了 23 名男性和 24 名女性。平均年龄和体重指数分别为 58 岁和 29 kg/m2。D1、D2和D3组分别有6、23和18名患者;T1、T2、H0和H1组分别有22、25、13和34名患者。所有病例的平均手术时间为 100 分钟。平均住院时间为 2.3 天,随访时间为 5 年。术后晚期并发症有 6 例:结论:考虑到对腹壁直肠膨出修复的最佳手术方法缺乏共识,根据我们的经验,"Slim-Mesh "技术是拯救、修复和加固腹壁直肠膨出患者(包括肥胖人群(53%))腹壁白线/直肌的有效、安全且易于重复使用的方法。
{"title":"\"Slim-Mesh\" Technique for Diastasis Recti Abdominis, Including Obesity-Related Cases.","authors":"Silvio Alen Canton","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00003","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>We operated on a series of mostly obese patients with diastasis recti abdominis using the \"Slim-Mesh\" technique to repair/reinforce the diastasis and linea alba/recti muscles without plicating and traumatizing them. Additional objectives were to decrease operation time and intra- and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We considered T1 cases diastasis after pregnancy and T2 cases obesity (BMI ≥ 30 mg/kg<sup>2</sup>); D1, D2, and D3 when the diastasis measured 2-3, 3-5, and ≥ 5 cm, respectively; H0 and H1 without and concomitant umbilical and/or epigastric hernia, respectively. At our Department, between May 2010 and November 2022, 47 patients with diastasis recti were operated on with the \"Slim-Mesh\" technique to reinforce/repair the traumatized linea alba/recti muscles, without plicating them. This was a prospective (83%)-retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 23 males and 24 females. Mean age and BMI was 58 years and 29 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Groups D1, D2, and D3 comprised 6, 23 and 18 patients, respectively; groups T1, T2, H0 and H1 comprised 22, 25, 13 and 34 patients, respectively. Mean operation time for all cases was 100 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 days and follow-up time was 5 years. We had 6 late postoperative complications: 3 hernia recurrences and 3 trocar site hernias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the lack of agreement on the best surgery for diastasis recti abdominis repair, in our experience the \"Slim-Mesh\" technique is a valid, safe and easy-to-reproduce way to save, repair and reinforce linea alba/recti muscles in diastasis recti patients, including the obese population (53%).</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984376/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Bariatric Surgery's Impact on Weight Loss and Diabetes: Sodium and Glucose Receptor Modulation. 探索减肥手术对减肥和糖尿病的影响:钠和葡萄糖受体调节。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00051
Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam, Mitchell Roslin, Amit Surve

Sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT) and glucose transporters (GLUT) have been shown to influence diabetes management by modulating glucose uptake by the intestine. Therefore, alterations in gastrointestinal anatomy during bariatric surgery can change SGLT and GLUT receptor activity. These changes offer an additional mechanism for weight loss and may explain the differential impact of the various bariatric surgical procedures. This review examines the current literature on SGLT and GLUT receptors and their effects on weight loss through genetic studies, pharmacologic inhibition, and how SGLT/GLUT receptors impact surgical physiologic modulation. A better understanding of Type I sodium-glucose cotransport receptors (SGLT-1), GLUT-2, and GLUT-5 could provide insight for improved procedures and allow us to determine the best method to tailor operations to a patient's individual needs.

钠-葡萄糖共转运体(SGLT)和葡萄糖转运体(GLUT)通过调节肠道对葡萄糖的吸收而影响糖尿病的治疗。因此,减肥手术中胃肠道解剖结构的改变会改变 SGLT 和 GLUT 受体的活性。这些变化为减肥提供了另一种机制,并可能解释各种减肥手术的不同影响。本综述通过基因研究、药物抑制以及 SGLT/GLUT 受体如何影响手术生理调节等方面,探讨了有关 SGLT 和 GLUT 受体及其对减肥影响的现有文献。更好地了解 I 型钠-葡萄糖共转运受体 (SGLT-1)、GLUT-2 和 GLUT-5 可为改进手术提供洞察力,并使我们能够确定根据患者的个人需求量身定制手术的最佳方法。
{"title":"Exploring Bariatric Surgery's Impact on Weight Loss and Diabetes: Sodium and Glucose Receptor Modulation.","authors":"Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam, Mitchell Roslin, Amit Surve","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00051","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT) and glucose transporters (GLUT) have been shown to influence diabetes management by modulating glucose uptake by the intestine. Therefore, alterations in gastrointestinal anatomy during bariatric surgery can change SGLT and GLUT receptor activity. These changes offer an additional mechanism for weight loss and may explain the differential impact of the various bariatric surgical procedures. This review examines the current literature on SGLT and GLUT receptors and their effects on weight loss through genetic studies, pharmacologic inhibition, and how SGLT/GLUT receptors impact surgical physiologic modulation. A better understanding of Type I sodium-glucose cotransport receptors (SGLT-1), GLUT-2, and GLUT-5 could provide insight for improved procedures and allow us to determine the best method to tailor operations to a patient's individual needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984375/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ovarian Loss in Laparoscopic and Robotic Cystectomy Compared Using Artificial Intelligence Pathology. 利用人工智能病理学比较腹腔镜和机器人膀胱切除术中的卵巢损失。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00001
Rooma Sinha, Himabindu Rallabandi, Rupa Bana, Moumita Bag, Rohit Raina, Sridhar D, Deepika H K, Padmapriya Reddy

A Comparison of Ovarian Loss Following Laparoscopic versus Robotic Cystectomy As Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Software.

Background and objective: To compare the area of ovarian tissue and follicular loss in the excised cystectomy specimen of endometrioma performed by laparoscopic or robotic technique.

Methods: Prospective observational study performed between April 2023 to August 2023. There were 14 patients each in Laparoscopic group (LC) and Robotic group (RC). Excised cyst wall sent was for to the pathologist who was blinded to the technique used for cystectomy. The pathological assessment was done by artificial intelligence-Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) software.

Results: The age was significantly lower in LC group; the rest of demographic results were comparable. The mean of the median ovarian area loss [Mean Rank, LC group (9.1 ± 15.1); RC (8.1 ± 12.4)] was higher in LC group. The mean of the median total follicular loss was higher in LC group (8.9 ± 9.2) when compared to RC group (6.3 ± 8.9) and was not significant. The area of ovarian loss in bilateral endometrioma was significantly higher in LC group (mean rank 7.5) as compared to RC group (mean rank 3) - (P = .016) despite more cases of bilateral disease in RC group. With increasing cyst size the LC group showed increased median loss of follicles when compared to RC group (strong correlation coefficient 0.347) but not statistically significant (P = .225). AAGL (American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists) score did not have any impact on the two techniques.

Conclusion: Robotic assistance reduces the area of ovarian and follicular loss during cystectomy of endometrioma especially in bilateral disease and increasing cyst size. It should be considered over the laparoscopic approach if available.

人工智能病理软件分析腹腔镜与机器人膀胱切除术后卵巢损失的比较.背景和目的:比较采用腹腔镜或机器人技术进行子宫内膜异位症膀胱切除术标本的卵巢组织面积和卵泡损失:比较采用腹腔镜或机器人技术进行子宫内膜异位症膀胱切除术标本中卵巢组织和卵泡丢失的面积:方法:2023年4月至2023年8月期间进行的前瞻性观察研究。腹腔镜组(LC)和机器人组(RC)各有 14 名患者。切除的囊壁送至病理学家处,病理学家对膀胱切除术所使用的技术是盲法。病理评估由人工智能全切片成像(WSI)软件完成:结果:LC 组患者的年龄明显偏低,其他人口统计学结果相当。LC组卵巢中位面积损失的平均值[Mean Rank, LC group (9.1 ± 15.1); RC (8.1 ± 12.4)]更高。与 RC 组(6.3 ± 8.9)相比,LC 组卵泡总损失中位数的平均值更高(8.9 ± 9.2),但无显著性差异。双侧子宫内膜异位症的卵巢损失面积在 LC 组(平均值为 7.5)明显高于 RC 组(平均值为 3)--(P = .016),尽管 RC 组的双侧病例更多。与 RC 组相比,随着囊肿的增大,LC 组的卵泡损失中位数增加(强相关系数 0.347),但无统计学意义(P = .225)。AAGL(美国妇科腹腔镜医师协会)评分对两种技术没有任何影响:结论:在子宫内膜异位瘤囊肿切除术中,机器人辅助减少了卵巢和卵泡损失的面积,尤其是在双侧疾病和囊肿增大的情况下。如果有条件,应考虑使用机器人辅助,而不是腹腔镜方法。
{"title":"Ovarian Loss in Laparoscopic and Robotic Cystectomy Compared Using Artificial Intelligence Pathology.","authors":"Rooma Sinha, Himabindu Rallabandi, Rupa Bana, Moumita Bag, Rohit Raina, Sridhar D, Deepika H K, Padmapriya Reddy","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00001","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Comparison of Ovarian Loss Following Laparoscopic versus Robotic Cystectomy As Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Software.</p><p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To compare the area of ovarian tissue and follicular loss in the excised cystectomy specimen of endometrioma performed by laparoscopic or robotic technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational study performed between April 2023 to August 2023. There were 14 patients each in Laparoscopic group (LC) and Robotic group (RC). Excised cyst wall sent was for to the pathologist who was blinded to the technique used for cystectomy. The pathological assessment was done by artificial intelligence-Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age was significantly lower in LC group; the rest of demographic results were comparable. The mean of the median ovarian area loss [Mean Rank, LC group (9.1 ± 15.1); RC (8.1 ± 12.4)] was higher in LC group. The mean of the median total follicular loss was higher in LC group (8.9 ± 9.2) when compared to RC group (6.3 ± 8.9) and was not significant. The area of ovarian loss in bilateral endometrioma was significantly higher in LC group (mean rank 7.5) as compared to RC group (mean rank 3) - (<i>P</i> = .016) despite more cases of bilateral disease in RC group. With increasing cyst size the LC group showed increased median loss of follicles when compared to RC group (strong correlation coefficient 0.347) but not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .225). AAGL (American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists) score did not have any impact on the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic assistance reduces the area of ovarian and follicular loss during cystectomy of endometrioma especially in bilateral disease and increasing cyst size. It should be considered over the laparoscopic approach if available.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modified Open Anterior Preperitoneal Repair. 改良开放式前腹膜前修补术。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00044
Rajeev Sinha, Albail S Yadav, Yasharth Sharma, Swarnava Chanda, Om Kumar Sharma, Nalin Srivastava

Background and objectives: Modified anterior preperitoneal (mAPP) repair for inguinal hernia (IH) was compared with Lichtenstein repair (LR) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs.

Methods: IH patients, after exclusions and subsequent matching for age, type, and extent of hernia, were assigned randomly for mAPP, LR or TAPP repair. The same surgical team performed all operations. Data of predefined endpoints for all the three groups were statistically compared.

Results: One hundred thirty-five patients underwent mAPP, 91 patients LR, and 181 patients TAPP. The operating time for both unilateral and bilateral hernias in the mAPP group was significantly shorter than in LR and TAPP groups. mAPP patients were discharged in significantly less time than LR patients but later than TAPP patients. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score at 24 hours in the mAPP patients was significantly less than LR but at 48 hours the difference was equivocal. But VAS score after mAPP at 24 and 48 hrs was more than in TAPP patients. However, the pain score across all the three groups was similar at 7 days. There was no surgical site infection (SSI) or mesh infection in any patient. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain was seen less often after mAPP than after LR but was least in TAPP patients. Recurrence across all the three groups was not much different.

Conclusion: mAPP appears to be a better choice for open IH repair than LR and matches the advantages of Laparoscopic repairs.

背景与目的:比较改良前腹膜前(mAPP)修复腹股沟疝(IH)与Lichtenstein修复(LR)和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复。方法:IH患者在排除后,根据年龄、类型和疝程度进行匹配,随机分配进行mAPP、LR或TAPP修复。所有的手术都由同一个手术小组完成。对三组患者的预定终点数据进行统计学比较。结果:135例患者行mAPP, 91例行LR, 181例行TAPP。mAPP组单侧和双侧疝的手术时间均明显短于LR和TAPP组。mAPP患者出院时间明显短于LR患者,但晚于TAPP患者。mAPP患者术后24小时视觉模拟评分(VAS)明显低于LR,但48小时差异不明显。但mAPP术后24、48小时VAS评分高于TAPP患者。然而,所有三组的疼痛评分在7天时相似。所有患者无手术部位感染(SSI)或补片感染。术后慢性腹股沟疼痛在mAPP患者中较少见,但在TAPP患者中最少。三组患者的复发率差别不大。结论:mAPP是开放性IH修复较LR更好的选择,符合腹腔镜修复的优点。
{"title":"Modified Open Anterior Preperitoneal Repair.","authors":"Rajeev Sinha, Albail S Yadav, Yasharth Sharma, Swarnava Chanda, Om Kumar Sharma, Nalin Srivastava","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00044","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Modified anterior preperitoneal (mAPP) repair for inguinal hernia (IH) was compared with Lichtenstein repair (LR) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IH patients, after exclusions and subsequent matching for age, type, and extent of hernia, were assigned randomly for mAPP, LR or TAPP repair. The same surgical team performed all operations. Data of predefined endpoints for all the three groups were statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-five patients underwent mAPP, 91 patients LR, and 181 patients TAPP. The operating time for both unilateral and bilateral hernias in the mAPP group was significantly shorter than in LR and TAPP groups. mAPP patients were discharged in significantly less time than LR patients but later than TAPP patients. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score at 24 hours in the mAPP patients was significantly less than LR but at 48 hours the difference was equivocal. But VAS score after mAPP at 24 and 48 hrs was more than in TAPP patients. However, the pain score across all the three groups was similar at 7 days. There was no surgical site infection (SSI) or mesh infection in any patient. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain was seen less often after mAPP than after LR but was least in TAPP patients. Recurrence across all the three groups was not much different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>mAPP appears to be a better choice for open IH repair than LR and matches the advantages of Laparoscopic repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690483/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138478035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Energy Device Preferences Among Gynecologic Surgeons. 妇科外科医生对能量装置的偏好。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00039
Lulu Yu, Adaeze A Emeka, Princess Urbina, Linda C Yang, Susan C Tsai, Angela Chaudhari, Magdy P Milad

Background and objectives: Multiple vessel-sealing devices are available for use during laparoscopy. The objective of this study is to determine what surgeon-level and device characteristics influence the choice of advanced energy device during gynecologic laparoscopy.

Methods: This is a national cross-sectional study of gynecologic surgeons conducted via social media, utilizing an online, publicly-available, anonymous survey. Gynecologic surgeons who had completed residency training were approached for participation in the survey. Survey completion was voluntary and involved no further follow-ups. The web-based survey consisted of six questions with the option to answer three additional questions if time permitted. The institutional review board determined that this study qualified for exemption.

Results: There were 92 respondents who participated in the survey. Of these, 81 completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Female respondents were younger and more frequently reported a glove size of 6.5 or less. Surgeon-level characteristics, including gender, age, glove size, case volume, region, and practice setting, were not significantly associated with preferred energy devices. Device availability in the operating room was the only characteristic associated with preferred energy devices (P-value = .0076). Other device-level characteristics such as optimal thermal spread, reduced plume, ease of use, device reliability, and teachability had no statistically significant association with preferred energy devices.

Conclusion: Multiple advanced energy devices are available for use during gynecologic laparoscopy. These devices have varying energy profiles, thermal spread, and device size. Despite this diversity, only device availability in the operating room influenced the surgeon's preferred device selection.

背景和目的:多种血管密封装置可用于腹腔镜检查。本研究的目的是确定在妇科腹腔镜手术中,手术水平和装置特性对先进能量装置选择的影响。方法:这是一项通过社交媒体进行的全国性妇科外科医生横断面研究,利用在线、公开、匿名调查。完成住院医师培训的妇科外科医生被邀请参与调查。调查的完成是自愿的,不涉及进一步的随访。这项基于网络的调查包括六个问题,如果时间允许,还可以选择回答另外三个问题。机构审查委员会确定该研究有资格获得豁免。结果:共有92人参与调查。其中81人完成了调查并被纳入分析。女性受访者更年轻,更频繁地报告手套尺寸为6.5或更小。外科医生水平的特征,包括性别、年龄、手套大小、病例量、地区和执业环境,与首选能量装置没有显著相关。手术室设备的可用性是与首选能源设备相关的唯一特征(p值= 0.0076)。其他设备级特征,如最佳热扩散、减少羽流、易用性、设备可靠性和可教化性,与首选能源设备没有统计学上的显著关联。结论:多种先进的能量装置可用于妇科腹腔镜手术。这些器件具有不同的能量分布、热扩散和器件尺寸。尽管存在这种多样性,但只有手术室的设备可用性影响了外科医生的首选设备选择。
{"title":"Energy Device Preferences Among Gynecologic Surgeons.","authors":"Lulu Yu, Adaeze A Emeka, Princess Urbina, Linda C Yang, Susan C Tsai, Angela Chaudhari, Magdy P Milad","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00039","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Multiple vessel-sealing devices are available for use during laparoscopy. The objective of this study is to determine what surgeon-level and device characteristics influence the choice of advanced energy device during gynecologic laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a national cross-sectional study of gynecologic surgeons conducted via social media, utilizing an online, publicly-available, anonymous survey. Gynecologic surgeons who had completed residency training were approached for participation in the survey. Survey completion was voluntary and involved no further follow-ups. The web-based survey consisted of six questions with the option to answer three additional questions if time permitted. The institutional review board determined that this study qualified for exemption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 92 respondents who participated in the survey. Of these, 81 completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Female respondents were younger and more frequently reported a glove size of 6.5 or less. Surgeon-level characteristics, including gender, age, glove size, case volume, region, and practice setting, were not significantly associated with preferred energy devices. Device availability in the operating room was the only characteristic associated with preferred energy devices (<i>P</i>-value = .0076). Other device-level characteristics such as optimal thermal spread, reduced plume, ease of use, device reliability, and teachability had no statistically significant association with preferred energy devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple advanced energy devices are available for use during gynecologic laparoscopy. These devices have varying energy profiles, thermal spread, and device size. Despite this diversity, only device availability in the operating room influenced the surgeon's preferred device selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690482/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138478034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Uterine Weight and Perioperative Morbidity in Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. 机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的子宫重量和围手术期发病率。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00042
Courtney K Pfeuti, Lianteng Zhi, Matthew K Hoffman

Background and objectives: Minimally invasive approaches to benign hysterectomy are the current standard of care when feasible. Use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RA-LH) has been increasing; however, direct comparative data that accounts for uterine weight in conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) and RA-LH is limited. We sought to examine the impact of uterine weight on immediate perioperative morbidity in CLH versus RA-LH. The primary outcome was a composite of complications including visceral injuries, conversions to abdominal procedures, and transfusions.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a minimally invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH and RA-LH) in a single hospital system between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 as identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. The primary exposure was CLH or RA-LH. Uterine weight was categorized into four groups: <150 g, 150 to < 250 g, 250 to < 450 g, and ≥ 450 g.

Results: A total of 1506 patients were included; 539 underwent CLH and 967 underwent RA-LH. Median uterine weight was higher in patients who underwent CLH (161.0 g) compared to RA-LH (147.0 g), P = .001. The odds of the composite of complications in CLH was 4.43 (2.84 - 6.92) higher than the odds of the composite in RA-LH. When stratified by the uterine weight, the odds of complications was significantly higher in CLH in the following categories: <150 g, 250 to < 450 g, and ≥ 450 g (OR: 4.41, 3.28, and 7.81, respectively).

Conclusion: Surgical morbidity was lower in RA-LH across the spectrum of uterine weights compared to CLH. Patients may particularly benefit from RA-LH at higher uterine weights.

背景和目的:在可行的情况下,微创子宫切除术是目前的标准治疗方法。机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术(RA-LH)的使用越来越多;然而,考虑到传统腹腔镜子宫切除术(CLH)和RA-LH子宫重量的直接比较数据有限。我们试图研究子宫重量对CLH和RA-LH患者围手术期即刻发病率的影响。主要结局是并发症的综合,包括内脏损伤、转向腹部手术和输血。方法:对2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日在单一医院系统中接受微创腹腔镜子宫切除术(CLH和RA-LH)的患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要暴露为CLH或RA-LH。子宫重量分为四组:结果:共纳入1506例患者;CLH 539例,RA-LH 967例。CLH组子宫中位重量(161.0 g)高于RA-LH组(147.0 g), P = 0.001。CLH合并并发症的几率比RA-LH合并并发症的几率高4.43(2.84 ~ 6.92)。当按子宫重量分层时,CLH的并发症发生率明显高于以下类别:结论:与CLH相比,RA-LH在子宫重量谱上的手术发病率较低。子宫重量较高的患者可能特别受益于RA-LH。
{"title":"Uterine Weight and Perioperative Morbidity in Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"Courtney K Pfeuti, Lianteng Zhi, Matthew K Hoffman","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00042","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Minimally invasive approaches to benign hysterectomy are the current standard of care when feasible. Use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RA-LH) has been increasing; however, direct comparative data that accounts for uterine weight in conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) and RA-LH is limited. We sought to examine the impact of uterine weight on immediate perioperative morbidity in CLH versus RA-LH. The primary outcome was a composite of complications including visceral injuries, conversions to abdominal procedures, and transfusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a minimally invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH and RA-LH) in a single hospital system between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 as identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. The primary exposure was CLH or RA-LH. Uterine weight was categorized into four groups: <150 g, 150 to < 250 g, 250 to < 450 g, and ≥ 450 g.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1506 patients were included; 539 underwent CLH and 967 underwent RA-LH. Median uterine weight was higher in patients who underwent CLH (161.0 g) compared to RA-LH (147.0 g), <i>P</i> = .001. The odds of the composite of complications in CLH was 4.43 (2.84 - 6.92) higher than the odds of the composite in RA-LH. When stratified by the uterine weight, the odds of complications was significantly higher in CLH in the following categories: <150 g, 250 to < 450 g, and ≥ 450 g (OR: 4.41, 3.28, and 7.81, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical morbidity was lower in RA-LH across the spectrum of uterine weights compared to CLH. Patients may particularly benefit from RA-LH at higher uterine weights.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690484/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138478036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of Medical Shark Skin Forceps: Improved Grasping Power and Easy Manipulation. 医用鲨鱼皮钳的研制:握力提高,操作简便。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00037
Yuma Takamura, Tetsuro Tominaga, Rui Zhu, Ikuo Yamamoto, Keitaro Matsumoto, Takeshi Nagayasu

Background and objectives: Important safety requirements for forceps used in surgical procedures are the ability to stably grasp fine tissue and to cause minimal tissue damage. Shark skin has the structural feature of circumpolar scales, which increase the frictional force of the scales by roughening their surface. We have developed and patented medical forceps with a shark skin pattern placed on the tip surfaces. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of the shark skin forceps compared with existing forceps, both fundamentally and clinically.

Methods: To evaluate gripping power and usability, we compared bead transfer times for each forceps type. Grasping force and frictional force were measured quantitatively and compared among the types. To evaluate safety, we performed pathological examination of lung and urethral tissue after grasping, in an animal experiment. Subjective assessment of user experience was then performed using a questionnaire.

Results: In the dry lab assessment, transfer time was fastest using the shark skin forceps (34 s vs 61 s and 62 s, p < 0.05). Frictional force values were highest for the shark skin forceps (p < 0.05). In the animal experiment, there was no difference in pathological tissue damage to lung or ureter tissues among the forceps types after grasping. The questionnaire responses indicated advantages of the shark skin forceps in terms of ease of grasping membranes and lower degree of grasp failure.

Conclusion: Forceps with shark skin on the tips showed greater stability of tissue grasping and equivalent safety compared with existing forceps.

背景和目的:外科手术中使用的钳子的重要安全要求是能够稳定地抓住精细组织并造成最小的组织损伤。鲨鱼皮具有环极鳞片的结构特征,通过使鳞片表面变粗糙来增加鳞片的摩擦力。我们开发了一种尖端表面有鲨鱼皮图案的医用钳子,并获得了专利。本研究的目的是从根本上和临床上检验鲨鱼皮钳与现有钳的安全性和有效性。方法:为了评估夹持力和可用性,我们比较了每种类型钳子的珠转移时间。对抓取力和摩擦力进行了定量测量,并对其进行了比较。为了评估安全性,我们在动物实验中对抓握后的肺和尿道组织进行了病理检查。然后使用问卷对用户体验进行主观评估。结果:在干燥的实验室评估中,使用鲨鱼皮钳的转移时间最快(34s vs 61s和62s,p 结论:与现有钳子相比,尖端有鲨鱼皮的钳子具有更大的组织抓取稳定性和同等的安全性。
{"title":"Development of Medical Shark Skin Forceps: Improved Grasping Power and Easy Manipulation.","authors":"Yuma Takamura, Tetsuro Tominaga, Rui Zhu, Ikuo Yamamoto, Keitaro Matsumoto, Takeshi Nagayasu","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00037","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Important safety requirements for forceps used in surgical procedures are the ability to stably grasp fine tissue and to cause minimal tissue damage. Shark skin has the structural feature of circumpolar scales, which increase the frictional force of the scales by roughening their surface. We have developed and patented medical forceps with a shark skin pattern placed on the tip surfaces. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of the shark skin forceps compared with existing forceps, both fundamentally and clinically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate gripping power and usability, we compared bead transfer times for each forceps type. Grasping force and frictional force were measured quantitatively and compared among the types. To evaluate safety, we performed pathological examination of lung and urethral tissue after grasping, in an animal experiment. Subjective assessment of user experience was then performed using a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dry lab assessment, transfer time was fastest using the shark skin forceps (34 s vs 61 s and 62 s, p < 0.05). Frictional force values were highest for the shark skin forceps (p < 0.05). In the animal experiment, there was no difference in pathological tissue damage to lung or ureter tissues among the forceps types after grasping. The questionnaire responses indicated advantages of the shark skin forceps in terms of ease of grasping membranes and lower degree of grasp failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Forceps with shark skin on the tips showed greater stability of tissue grasping and equivalent safety compared with existing forceps.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627341/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71483070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1