首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip. Hem-o-Lok夹与钛夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中残端闭合方法的比较。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029
Mehmet Uçar, Aziz Bulut

Background: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal surgery. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries are performed with different techniques. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a widespread method due to its advantages. The aim of this study is to compare the complications, surgery time, hospitalization length, and cost-effectiveness of titanium clips and hem-o-lok clips for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods: This study included 187 patients who were operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis at our hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. The patients' follow-up for 30 days after surgery was evaluated. The data of 179 patients in whom titanium and hem-o-lok clips were inserted during an appendectomy were included in the study.

Results: Between April 2019 and June 2022, 179 patients were included in the study retrospectively. When the correlation between complications and surgical methods was analyzed, 98.8% of the hem-o-lok clip group and 99% of the titanium clip group had no complications. No statistically significant difference was observed between complications and surgery type (P > .05). In the hem-o-lok and titanium clip groups, the operative time was 52.4 minutes and 53.1 minutes, and the hospitalization times were 1.7 days and 1.8 days, respectively.

Conclusions: It is concluded that the use of titanium clips that completely close the root of the appendix is as safe, accessible, feasible, practical, and effective as the hem-o-lok clip method. It was observed to be used safely as an alternative to other appendix root closure methods.

背景:急性阑尾炎的阑尾切除术是最常见的急腹症手术。开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除手术采用不同的技术。腹腔镜阑尾切除术因其优势已成为一种广泛使用的方法。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术中钛夹和hem-o-lok夹用于残端闭合的并发症、手术时间、住院时间和成本效益:本研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在我院接受腹腔镜急性阑尾炎手术的 187 例患者。对患者术后 30 天的随访情况进行了评估。在阑尾切除术中插入钛夹和血锁夹的179名患者的数据也被纳入研究范围:结果:在2019年4月至2022年6月期间,179名患者被纳入回顾性研究。在分析并发症与手术方法的相关性时,98.8%的hem-o-lok夹子组和99%的钛夹子组没有出现并发症。并发症与手术类型之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在hem-o-lok和钛夹组,手术时间分别为52.4分钟和53.1分钟,住院时间分别为1.7天和1.8天:结论:使用钛夹完全闭合阑尾根部与hem-o-lok夹方法一样安全、方便、可行、实用和有效。据观察,它可以安全地替代其他阑尾根部闭合方法。
{"title":"Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip.","authors":"Mehmet Uçar, Aziz Bulut","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendectomy for acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal surgery. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries are performed with different techniques. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a widespread method due to its advantages. The aim of this study is to compare the complications, surgery time, hospitalization length, and cost-effectiveness of titanium clips and hem-o-lok clips for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 187 patients who were operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis at our hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. The patients' follow-up for 30 days after surgery was evaluated. The data of 179 patients in whom titanium and hem-o-lok clips were inserted during an appendectomy were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2019 and June 2022, 179 patients were included in the study retrospectively. When the correlation between complications and surgical methods was analyzed, 98.8% of the hem-o-lok clip group and 99% of the titanium clip group had no complications. No statistically significant difference was observed between complications and surgery type (<i>P</i> > .05). In the hem-o-lok and titanium clip groups, the operative time was 52.4 minutes and 53.1 minutes, and the hospitalization times were 1.7 days and 1.8 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is concluded that the use of titanium clips that completely close the root of the appendix is as safe, accessible, feasible, practical, and effective as the hem-o-lok clip method. It was observed to be used safely as an alternative to other appendix root closure methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723334/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Racial Disparities in Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy. 微创良性子宫切除术中的种族差异。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00018
Kamran Hessami, Marie-Claire Leaf, Jinxiao Liang, Adi Katz, Frank Chervenak, Abdelrahman AlAshqar, Mostafa A Borahay

Background and objectives: Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and the rate of surgical complications in minority groups remain profoundly underinvestigated. This meta-analysis aims to compare the rate of MIS utilization for benign hysterectomy as well as the surgical morbidity among racial and ethnic minority patients in the United States.

Methods: Studies comparing utilization rate of MIS for benign hysterectomy among non-Hispanic white, Black, and Hispanic populations were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of MIS according to race. The secondary outcome was surgical morbidity risk (Clavien-Dindo Classification) according to hysterectomy route and race. Random-effect model meta-analysis pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Thirteen studies were eligible, with a total of 1,123,851 patients undergoing benign hysterectomy, of whom 817,209 were white, 187,488 Black, and 119,154 Hispanic. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo MIS compared to white patients (Black: OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.39-0.49] and Hispanic: OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.59-0.71]). After pooling adjusted estimates, the rate of MIS use remained significantly lower in nonwhite populations. Nonwhite patients were more likely to develop surgical complications after hysterectomy in either MIS (OR 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.52]) or open hysterectomy (OR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.40-1.73]).

Conclusion: Racial and ethnic disparities in MIS utilization for benign hysterectomy are strikingly apparent in the United States, with nonwhite patients often demonstrating lower access to MIS utilization and higher rates of surgical morbidity than white patients.

背景和目的:少数民族在微创手术(MIS)和手术并发症发生率方面的种族和民族差异仍未得到充分研究。本荟萃分析旨在比较美国种族和少数民族患者良性子宫切除术中MIS的使用率以及手术发病率。方法:比较MIS在非西班牙裔白人、黑人和西班牙裔人群中良性子宫切除术的使用率的研究被认为是合格的。主要结果是不同种族的MIS发生率。次要终点是根据子宫切除途径和种族的手术发病率(Clavien-Dindo分类)。随机效应模型荟萃分析将未调整和调整的优势比(ORs)合并为95%置信区间(ci)。结果:13项研究符合条件,共1,123,851例患者接受良性子宫切除术,其中817,209例为白人,187,488例为黑人,119,154例为西班牙裔。与白人患者相比,黑人和西班牙裔患者较少发生MIS(黑人:OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.39-0.49],西班牙裔:OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.59-0.71])。在汇总调整后的估计后,非白人人口的MIS使用率仍然明显较低。非白人患者在MIS (OR 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.52])或开放式子宫切除术(OR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.40-1.73])中更容易出现子宫切除术后的手术并发症。结论:在美国,良性子宫切除术中MIS使用的种族差异非常明显,非白人患者通常比白人患者更少使用MIS,手术发病率更高。
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy.","authors":"Kamran Hessami, Marie-Claire Leaf, Jinxiao Liang, Adi Katz, Frank Chervenak, Abdelrahman AlAshqar, Mostafa A Borahay","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00018","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and the rate of surgical complications in minority groups remain profoundly underinvestigated. This meta-analysis aims to compare the rate of MIS utilization for benign hysterectomy as well as the surgical morbidity among racial and ethnic minority patients in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies comparing utilization rate of MIS for benign hysterectomy among non-Hispanic white, Black, and Hispanic populations were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of MIS according to race. The secondary outcome was surgical morbidity risk (Clavien-Dindo Classification) according to hysterectomy route and race. Random-effect model meta-analysis pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were eligible, with a total of 1,123,851 patients undergoing benign hysterectomy, of whom 817,209 were white, 187,488 Black, and 119,154 Hispanic. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo MIS compared to white patients (Black: OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.39-0.49] and Hispanic: OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.59-0.71]). After pooling adjusted estimates, the rate of MIS use remained significantly lower in nonwhite populations. Nonwhite patients were more likely to develop surgical complications after hysterectomy in either MIS (OR 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.52]) or open hysterectomy (OR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.40-1.73]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in MIS utilization for benign hysterectomy are strikingly apparent in the United States, with nonwhite patients often demonstrating lower access to MIS utilization and higher rates of surgical morbidity than white patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot Assisted Cholecystectomy Using the BORNS Simphoni System. 使用伯恩斯Simphoni系统的机器人辅助胆囊切除术。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00016
Vivek Bindal, Shailesh Gupta, Dhananjay Pandey, Shahiq Ahmed

Background and objective: Robotic cholecystectomy has technical advantages of 3D visualization, enhanced instrument maneuverability, and increased precision. Less chance of conversion to open and biliary spillage. This study explores the utilization of the BORNS Simphoni Robotic System for robotic cholecystectomy.

Methods: The paper discusses the safety and efficacy of the system during a phase 1 clinical trial, focusing on key technical steps, outcomes, and comparisons with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results: Results from the trial indicate successful completion of surgeries with no conversions to open procedures, minimal blood loss, and low postoperative pain.

Discussion: The BORNS Simphoni system offers advanced features such as an open console design, articulating and nonarticulating instruments, and integrated ultrasonic energy sources. The study suggests the feasibility and effectiveness of robotic cholecystectomy using the BORNS Simphoni system. However, a larger sample size is needed to further evaluate and confirm these findings, as well as to assess the cost-effectiveness of this platform for broader adoption.

背景与目的:机器人胆囊切除术具有三维可视化、增强器械可操作性、提高手术精度等技术优势。转化为开放性和胆道溢出的可能性较小。本研究探讨了伯恩斯Simphoni机器人系统在机器人胆囊切除术中的应用。方法:在一期临床试验中讨论该系统的安全性和有效性,重点讨论关键技术步骤、结果,并与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行比较。结果:试验结果表明手术成功完成,无转开腹手术,出血量最小,术后疼痛低。讨论:伯恩斯Simphoni系统提供了先进的功能,如开放式控制台设计,铰接和非铰接仪器,以及集成的超声波能量源。本研究提示了采用伯恩斯Simphoni系统进行机器人胆囊切除术的可行性和有效性。然而,需要更大的样本量来进一步评估和确认这些发现,并评估该平台的成本效益,以便更广泛地采用。
{"title":"Robot Assisted Cholecystectomy Using the BORNS Simphoni System.","authors":"Vivek Bindal, Shailesh Gupta, Dhananjay Pandey, Shahiq Ahmed","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00016","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Robotic cholecystectomy has technical advantages of 3D visualization, enhanced instrument maneuverability, and increased precision. Less chance of conversion to open and biliary spillage. This study explores the utilization of the BORNS Simphoni Robotic System for robotic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The paper discusses the safety and efficacy of the system during a phase 1 clinical trial, focusing on key technical steps, outcomes, and comparisons with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the trial indicate successful completion of surgeries with no conversions to open procedures, minimal blood loss, and low postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The BORNS Simphoni system offers advanced features such as an open console design, articulating and nonarticulating instruments, and integrated ultrasonic energy sources. The study suggests the feasibility and effectiveness of robotic cholecystectomy using the BORNS Simphoni system. However, a larger sample size is needed to further evaluate and confirm these findings, as well as to assess the cost-effectiveness of this platform for broader adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In Vivo Measurements of Appendiceal Base - Implications on Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy. 阑尾基底的体内测量-对儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术的意义。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00033
Sanimir Suljendic, Edin Husaric, Amir Halilbasic, Samir Delibegovic

Background and objectives: Securing the base of the appendix is the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Determining the average values of the appendix, will facilitate the creation of suitable instruments, and will also have an impact on research in imaging studies.

Methods: One hundred and eight patients with the acute appendicitis were randomized into 2 groups: group I: children aged 2-10 years old, group II: children >10 years of age. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups: phlegmonous, gangrenous and perforated forms of acute appendicitis. The external diameter of the appendiceal base, the middle part of the appendix, the tip and the length were determined. The measurements were made with the help of Vernier calipers, and expressed in millimeters.

Results: In group I, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 5.68 ± 1.51 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.08 ± 1.82 mm, and in the perforated form 6.94 ± 2.43 mm. In group II, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 7.29 ± 2.75 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.24 ± 2.11 mm, and in the perforated form 9.31 ± 3.07 mm.

Conclusion: Although most appendices can be removed by standard methods, the maximum sizes observed in this study reveal that standard endoloop or plastic and titanium clips cannot be used in the procedure and instead the more expensive stapler has to be utilized.

背景和目的:固定阑尾底部是儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术中最关键的部分。确定阑尾的平均值将有助于创造合适的器械,也将对影像学研究产生影响:方法:将 108 名急性阑尾炎患者随机分为两组:第一组:2-10 岁儿童;第二组:10 岁以上儿童。每组又分为 3 个亚组:痰型、坏疽型和穿孔型急性阑尾炎。测定阑尾基底、阑尾中间部分、顶端和长度的外径。测量使用游标卡尺,单位为毫米:在第一组中,痰状阑尾基底的平均尺寸为 5.68 ± 1.51 毫米,坏疽阑尾基底的平均尺寸为 7.08 ± 1.82 毫米,穿孔阑尾基底的平均尺寸为 6.94 ± 2.43 毫米。在第二组中,痰状阑尾基底的平均尺寸为(7.29 ± 2.75)毫米,坏疽阑尾基底的平均尺寸为(7.24 ± 2.11)毫米,穿孔阑尾基底的平均尺寸为(9.31 ± 3.07)毫米:虽然大多数阑尾都能通过标准方法切除,但本研究中观察到的最大阑尾尺寸表明,手术中不能使用标准内环或塑料和钛夹,而必须使用更昂贵的订书机。
{"title":"In Vivo Measurements of Appendiceal Base - Implications on Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy.","authors":"Sanimir Suljendic, Edin Husaric, Amir Halilbasic, Samir Delibegovic","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00033","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Securing the base of the appendix is the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Determining the average values of the appendix, will facilitate the creation of suitable instruments, and will also have an impact on research in imaging studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and eight patients with the acute appendicitis were randomized into 2 groups: group I: children aged 2-10 years old, group II: children >10 years of age. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups: phlegmonous, gangrenous and perforated forms of acute appendicitis. The external diameter of the appendiceal base, the middle part of the appendix, the tip and the length were determined. The measurements were made with the help of Vernier calipers, and expressed in millimeters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 5.68 ± 1.51 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.08 ± 1.82 mm, and in the perforated form 6.94 ± 2.43 mm. In group II, the average size of the appendiceal base in the phlegmonous form was 7.29 ± 2.75 mm, in the gangrenous form 7.24 ± 2.11 mm, and in the perforated form 9.31 ± 3.07 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most appendices can be removed by standard methods, the maximum sizes observed in this study reveal that standard endoloop or plastic and titanium clips cannot be used in the procedure and instead the more expensive stapler has to be utilized.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally Invasive Surgery Deserts: Is There a Role for Robotic Assisted Surgery? 微创手术的荒漠:机器人辅助手术是否有一席之地?
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00039
Brian Mitzman, Shaneeta Johnson, Maureen Lichtveld, Richard Culbertson, Zhi Ven Fong

Despite evidence indicating patient and hospital benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) over open surgery, there is still access barriers to MIS. Availability of training and associated learning curve, health literacy, and hospital characteristics (location, size) have been identified as the primary barriers to the adoption of MIS. Robotic assisted surgery could help to overcome some of these barriers and increase access to MIS through easier tele-mentoring and potential for remote access.

尽管有证据表明微创手术(MIS)比开放手术对患者和医院有利,但仍存在进入MIS的障碍。培训的可获得性和相关的学习曲线、卫生知识和医院特征(地点、规模)已被确定为采用管理信息系统的主要障碍。机器人辅助手术可以帮助克服其中一些障碍,并通过更容易的远程指导和远程访问的潜力增加对管理信息系统的访问。
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Surgery Deserts: Is There a Role for Robotic Assisted Surgery?","authors":"Brian Mitzman, Shaneeta Johnson, Maureen Lichtveld, Richard Culbertson, Zhi Ven Fong","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00039","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite evidence indicating patient and hospital benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) over open surgery, there is still access barriers to MIS. Availability of training and associated learning curve, health literacy, and hospital characteristics (location, size) have been identified as the primary barriers to the adoption of MIS. Robotic assisted surgery could help to overcome some of these barriers and increase access to MIS through easier tele-mentoring and potential for remote access.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Pain Desensitization Algorithm for Phenotyping and Treating Chronic Pelvic Pain. 用于表型和治疗慢性盆腔疼痛的疼痛脱敏算法。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00009
Liane Silva Rafael Rogério, Maurice K Chung, Charles W Butrick, Stanley J Antolak, Danniel Rocha Bevilaqua, Sunna Kureishy, Mariana Eiras Cardoso Conforto

Background: Chronic pelvic pain remains challenging for physicians to manage due to central and peripheral sensitization and multiple pain generators including the bladder, pelvic floor, and pudendal nerve. Pain management providers have used nerve blocks for years for diagnosis and treatment. We developed a desensitization algorithm that provides a stepwise approach to improve patients pain scores.

Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study of 182 women aged 15-90 years old with chronic pelvic pain using an algorithm from 2016 to 2018. Treatment started with an Anesthetic Challenge Test of the bladder to guide us through a protocol of intravesical therapy and/or pudendal nerve blocks as a second step.

Results: ACT POSITIVE patients, who received intravesical therapy: 84% had a Visual Analog Score pain improvement of at least 50%, 64% improved at least 80% (41% pain-free). Those desiring additional relief that received further Pudendal Blocks: 83% had final improvement of at least 50% (67% pain-free). ACT NEGATIVE patients received Pudendal Blocks with 80% of subjects achieving at least 50% relief, 65% improved at least 80% (35% pain-free). All final groups showed a statistically significance of P < .05% when compared to their initial pain scores.

Conclusion: Management of women with chronic pelvic pain would ideally start with treating a specific diagnosis which, in most cases, is difficult to establish since the majority have more than one pain generator. Our algorithm simplified the approach and reduced the severity of pain scores prior to any further necessary surgical interventions.

背景:由于中枢和外周的敏感性以及包括膀胱、盆底和阴部神经在内的多种疼痛发生器,慢性盆腔疼痛对医生来说仍然具有挑战性。多年来,疼痛治疗提供者一直使用神经阻滞进行诊断和治疗。我们开发了一种脱敏算法,提供了一种逐步改善患者疼痛评分的方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,从 2016 年到 2018 年,对 182 名年龄在 15-90 岁之间、患有慢性盆腔疼痛的女性采用了该算法。治疗从膀胱麻醉挑战测试开始,作为第二步,通过膀胱内治疗和/或阴部神经阻滞方案为我们提供指导:ACT阳性患者接受膀胱内治疗后:84%的患者视觉模拟评分疼痛改善至少50%,64%改善至少80%(41%无痛)。那些希望进一步缓解疼痛的患者接受了进一步的牡丹膜阻滞治疗:83% 的患者最终疼痛改善了至少 50% (67% 无痛)。ACT阴性的患者接受了耻骨上阻滞治疗,80%的受试者至少缓解了50%的症状,65%的受试者至少改善了80%的症状(35%的受试者无痛)。所有最终分组的 P 值在统计学上都有显著意义:对患有慢性盆腔痛的妇女进行治疗时,理想的做法是先进行具体诊断,但在大多数情况下,很难确定具体诊断,因为大多数人都有不止一种疼痛诱因。我们的算法简化了治疗方法,并在采取任何必要的手术干预措施之前降低了疼痛评分的严重程度。
{"title":"A Pain Desensitization Algorithm for Phenotyping and Treating Chronic Pelvic Pain.","authors":"Liane Silva Rafael Rogério, Maurice K Chung, Charles W Butrick, Stanley J Antolak, Danniel Rocha Bevilaqua, Sunna Kureishy, Mariana Eiras Cardoso Conforto","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00009","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pelvic pain remains challenging for physicians to manage due to central and peripheral sensitization and multiple pain generators including the bladder, pelvic floor, and pudendal nerve. Pain management providers have used nerve blocks for years for diagnosis and treatment. We developed a desensitization algorithm that provides a stepwise approach to improve patients pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort study of 182 women aged 15-90 years old with chronic pelvic pain using an algorithm from 2016 to 2018. Treatment started with an Anesthetic Challenge Test of the bladder to guide us through a protocol of intravesical therapy and/or pudendal nerve blocks as a second step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACT POSITIVE patients, who received intravesical therapy: 84% had a Visual Analog Score pain improvement of at least 50%, 64% improved at least 80% (41% pain-free). Those desiring additional relief that received further Pudendal Blocks: 83% had final improvement of at least 50% (67% pain-free). ACT NEGATIVE patients received Pudendal Blocks with 80% of subjects achieving at least 50% relief, 65% improved at least 80% (35% pain-free). All final groups showed a statistically significance of <i>P</i> < .05% when compared to their initial pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of women with chronic pelvic pain would ideally start with treating a specific diagnosis which, in most cases, is difficult to establish since the majority have more than one pain generator. Our algorithm simplified the approach and reduced the severity of pain scores prior to any further necessary surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406477/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders. 人工智能在肛门直肠疾病和盆底障碍中的现状和作用。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00007
Maryam Aleissa, Tijani Osumah, Ernesto Drelichman, Vijay Mittal, Jasneet Bhullar

Background: Anorectal diseases and pelvic floor disorders are prevalent among the general population. Patients may present with overlapping symptoms, delaying diagnosis, and lowering quality of life. Treating physicians encounter numerous challenges attributed to the complex nature of pelvic anatomy, limitations of diagnostic techniques, and lack of available resources. This article is an overview of the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) in tackling the difficulties of managing benign anorectal disorders and pelvic floor disorders.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed database to identify all potentially relevant studies published from January 2000 to August 2023. Search queries were built using the following terms: AI, machine learning, deep learning, benign anorectal disease, pelvic floor disorder, fecal incontinence, obstructive defecation, anal fistula, rectal prolapse, and anorectal manometry. Malignant anorectal articles and abstracts were excluded. Data from selected articles were analyzed.

Results: 139 articles were found, 15 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common AI module was convolutional neural network. researchers were able to develop AI modules to optimize imaging studies for pelvis, fistula, and abscess anatomy, facilitated anorectal manometry interpretation, and improved high-definition anoscope use. None of the modules were validated in an external cohort.

Conclusion: There is potential for AI to enhance the management of pelvic floor and benign anorectal diseases. Ongoing research necessitates the use of multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration between physicians and AI programmers to tackle pressing challenges.

背景:肛门直肠疾病和盆底障碍在普通人群中很普遍。患者可能会出现重叠症状,延误诊断,降低生活质量。由于盆腔解剖的复杂性、诊断技术的局限性以及可用资源的缺乏,治疗医生遇到了许多挑战。本文概述了人工智能(AI)在解决良性肛门直肠疾病和盆底疾病管理难题方面的现状:方法:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行了系统性文献综述。我们检索了 PubMed 数据库,以确定 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间发表的所有潜在相关研究。搜索查询使用了以下术语:人工智能、机器学习、深度学习、良性肛门直肠疾病、盆底障碍、大便失禁、排便障碍、肛瘘、直肠脱垂和肛门直肠测压。恶性肛门直肠病文章和摘要被排除在外。对所选文章的数据进行了分析:结果:共找到 139 篇文章,其中 15 篇符合我们的纳入和排除标准。最常见的人工智能模块是卷积神经网络。研究人员能够开发人工智能模块来优化骨盆、瘘管和脓肿解剖的成像研究,促进肛门直肠测压的解释,并改善高清肛门镜的使用。这些模块均未在外部队列中得到验证:结论:人工智能有可能加强盆底和良性肛门直肠疾病的治疗。正在进行的研究需要使用多学科方法以及医生和人工智能程序员之间的合作,以应对紧迫的挑战。
{"title":"Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.","authors":"Maryam Aleissa, Tijani Osumah, Ernesto Drelichman, Vijay Mittal, Jasneet Bhullar","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00007","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anorectal diseases and pelvic floor disorders are prevalent among the general population. Patients may present with overlapping symptoms, delaying diagnosis, and lowering quality of life. Treating physicians encounter numerous challenges attributed to the complex nature of pelvic anatomy, limitations of diagnostic techniques, and lack of available resources. This article is an overview of the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) in tackling the difficulties of managing benign anorectal disorders and pelvic floor disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed database to identify all potentially relevant studies published from January 2000 to August 2023. Search queries were built using the following terms: AI, machine learning, deep learning, benign anorectal disease, pelvic floor disorder, fecal incontinence, obstructive defecation, anal fistula, rectal prolapse, and anorectal manometry. Malignant anorectal articles and abstracts were excluded. Data from selected articles were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>139 articles were found, 15 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common AI module was convolutional neural network. researchers were able to develop AI modules to optimize imaging studies for pelvis, fistula, and abscess anatomy, facilitated anorectal manometry interpretation, and improved high-definition anoscope use. None of the modules were validated in an external cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is potential for AI to enhance the management of pelvic floor and benign anorectal diseases. Ongoing research necessitates the use of multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration between physicians and AI programmers to tackle pressing challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEONTM Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. 美敦力Tri-StapleTM预装对接材料和AEONTM缝合器在减肥手术中止血和缝合线完整性的比较分析。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058
Gabrielle Hogan, Ravi Rao, Aditya Rao, Faran Talebi

Background and objectives: Haemostasis-related complications associated with Medtronic Tri-stapleTM with preloaded buttress material and the novel, naked AEONTM gastrointestinal staplers have not been extensively studied in bariatric surgery. The study aimed to assess and compare the 30-day haemostasis-related complications between Medtronic Tri-stapleTM and AEONTM GIA staplers.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent primary or revision sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or the sleeve component of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) in a private hospital in Australia between November 2021 and December 2022. The surgeries were performed by a single surgeon, using either Medtronic Tri-stapleTM or AEONTM staplers.

Results: The analysis included 250 patients, with the first 125 consecutive patients receiving staple line using the Medtronic Tri-stapleTM GIA stapler and the subsequent 125 patients receiving staple line using the AEONTM GIA stapler. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of surgical procedures between the Medtronic and AEON groups. In the AEON group, there were statistically higher numbers of diabetics and former tobacco users, while other preoperative characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The AEON group had a significantly longer mean operative time, while the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. No intraoperative or 30-day complications, deaths, emergency room visits, readmissions, or reoperations were observed in either group.

Conclusion: The novel, naked AEONTM stapler demonstrated non-inferiority to the established Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with preloaded buttress material in achieving hemostasis and maintaining staple-line integrity in bariatric surgery.

背景和目的:美敦力 Tri-stapleTM 预装对接材料和新型裸露 AEONTM 胃肠道订书机的止血相关并发症尚未在减肥手术中得到广泛研究。本研究旨在评估和比较美敦力 Tri-stapleTM 和 AEONTM GIA 订书机 30 天止血相关并发症:对 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在澳大利亚一家私立医院接受初次或翻修袖带胃切除术(SG)或单吻合十二指肠-回肠搭桥术袖带部分(SADI-S)的患者数据进行了回顾性分析。手术由一名外科医生使用美敦力 Tri-stapleTM 或 AEONTM 订书机进行:分析对象包括 250 名患者,其中前 125 名患者连续使用美敦力 Tri-stapleTM GIA 订书机接受缝合线手术,后 125 名患者使用 AEONTM GIA 订书机接受缝合线手术。统计分析显示,美敦力组和 AEON 组的手术程序分布无明显差异。据统计,AEON组中糖尿病患者和曾经吸烟者的人数较多,而两组患者的其他术前特征没有明显差异。AEON 组的平均手术时间明显更长,而住院时间则明显更短。两组患者均未出现术中或30天内并发症、死亡、急诊就诊、再入院或再次手术:结论:在减肥手术中,新型裸露 AEONTM 订书机在实现止血和保持订书机线完整性方面不劣于美敦力 Tri-StapleTM 订书机。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-Staple<sup>TM</sup> with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEON<sup>TM</sup> Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.","authors":"Gabrielle Hogan, Ravi Rao, Aditya Rao, Faran Talebi","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Haemostasis-related complications associated with Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> with preloaded buttress material and the novel, naked AEON<sup>TM</sup> gastrointestinal staplers have not been extensively studied in bariatric surgery. The study aimed to assess and compare the 30-day haemostasis-related complications between Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> and AEON<sup>TM</sup> GIA staplers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent primary or revision sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or the sleeve component of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) in a private hospital in Australia between November 2021 and December 2022. The surgeries were performed by a single surgeon, using either Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> or AEON<sup>TM</sup> staplers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 250 patients, with the first 125 consecutive patients receiving staple line using the Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> GIA stapler and the subsequent 125 patients receiving staple line using the AEON<sup>TM</sup> GIA stapler. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of surgical procedures between the Medtronic and AEON groups. In the AEON group, there were statistically higher numbers of diabetics and former tobacco users, while other preoperative characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The AEON group had a significantly longer mean operative time, while the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. No intraoperative or 30-day complications, deaths, emergency room visits, readmissions, or reoperations were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel, naked AEON<sup>TM</sup> stapler demonstrated non-inferiority to the established Medtronic Tri-Staple<sup>TM</sup> with preloaded buttress material in achieving hemostasis and maintaining staple-line integrity in bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning. 医学研究的局限性:认识、影响和警告。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049
Douglas E Ott

Background: As the number of limitations increases in a medical research article, their consequences multiply and the validity of findings decreases. How often do limitations occur in a medical article? What are the implications of limitation interaction? How often are the conclusions hedged in their explanation?

Objective: To identify the number, type, and frequency of limitations and words used to describe conclusion(s) in medical research articles.

Methods: Search, analysis, and evaluation of open access research articles from 2021 and 2022 from the Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery and 2022 Surgical Endoscopy for type(s) of limitation(s) admitted to by author(s) and the number of times they occurred. Limitations not admitted to were found, obvious, and not claimed. An automated text analysis was performed for hedging words in conclusion statements. A limitation index score is proposed to gauge the validity of statements and conclusions as the number of limitations increases.

Results: A total of 298 articles were reviewed and analyzed, finding 1,764 limitations. Four articles had no limitations. The average was between 3.7% and 6.9% per article. Hedging, weasel words and words of estimative probability description was found in 95.6% of the conclusions.

Conclusions: Limitations and their number matter. The greater the number of limitations and ramifications of their effects, the more outcomes and conclusions are affected. Wording ambiguity using hedging or weasel words shows that limitations affect the uncertainty of claims. The limitation index scoring method shows the diminished validity of finding(s) and conclusion(s).

背景:随着医学研究文章中局限性的增加,其后果也会成倍增加,研究结果的有效性也会降低。在医学文章中,限制出现的频率如何?局限性相互作用的影响是什么?结论的解释有多少是对冲性的?确定医学研究文章中局限性的数量、类型和频率,以及用于描述结论的词语:搜索、分析和评估《腹腔镜和机器人手术学会杂志》和《2022 年外科内镜杂志》2021 年和 2022 年的开放存取研究文章,以了解作者承认的限制类型及其出现的次数。未承认的限制是发现的、明显的和未声称的。对结论陈述中的对冲词进行了自动文本分析。随着限制因素数量的增加,提出了限制因素指数分值来衡量声明和结论的有效性:共对 298 篇文章进行了审查和分析,发现了 1,764 个限制条件。有 4 篇文章没有局限性。平均每篇文章的局限性在 3.7% 到 6.9% 之间。在95.6%的结论中发现了套话、黄鼠狼词和估计概率描述词:结论:限制及其数量很重要。限制及其影响的数量越多,结果和结论受到的影响就越大。使用对冲词或黄鼠狼词进行模糊措辞表明,限制会影响索赔的不确定性。限制指数评分法显示了结果和结论的有效性降低。
{"title":"Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning.","authors":"Douglas E Ott","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the number of limitations increases in a medical research article, their consequences multiply and the validity of findings decreases. How often do limitations occur in a medical article? What are the implications of limitation interaction? How often are the conclusions hedged in their explanation?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the number, type, and frequency of limitations and words used to describe conclusion(s) in medical research articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search, analysis, and evaluation of open access research articles from 2021 and 2022 from the <i>Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery</i> and 2022 <i>Surgical Endoscopy</i> for type(s) of limitation(s) admitted to by author(s) and the number of times they occurred. Limitations not admitted to were found, obvious, and not claimed. An automated text analysis was performed for hedging words in conclusion statements. A limitation index score is proposed to gauge the validity of statements and conclusions as the number of limitations increases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 298 articles were reviewed and analyzed, finding 1,764 limitations. Four articles had no limitations. The average was between 3.7% and 6.9% per article. Hedging, weasel words and words of estimative probability description was found in 95.6% of the conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limitations and their number matter. The greater the number of limitations and ramifications of their effects, the more outcomes and conclusions are affected. Wording ambiguity using hedging or weasel words shows that limitations affect the uncertainty of claims. The limitation index scoring method shows the diminished validity of finding(s) and conclusion(s).</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up. 腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术--美国军队的长期随访经验。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059
Carolyn Judge, Jesse Bandle, Andrew Wang, Kyle Gadbois, Amanda Simsiman, Robin Wood, Gordon Wisbach

Objectives: We present our initial clinical experience applying Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy in ten patients at a military institution.

Methods: A posterior colpotomy was created to accommodate a single site working port used to facilitate dissection and gallbladder mobilization under direct visualization via an infraumbilical port. The specimen was retrieved through the vagina and the colpotomy was closed with absorbable suture under direct visualization. Long-term follow up was performed over the phone to assess quality of life with 2 widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys including RAND-36 Health Item Survey (Version 1.0),1 and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).2.

Results: Ten women underwent a laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) with 7 available for long-term follow-up. The average age was 28.9 years (20-37) and the indications for surgery included symptomatic cholelithiasis (9) and biliary dyskinesia (1). The mean operative time was 129 mins (95-180), and median blood loss was 34 ml (5-400). There were no conversions and the average length of stay was 9.98 hours (2.4-28.8). Pain (analogue scale 1-10) on postoperative day three was minimal (mean 2.3) and was limited to the infraumbilical incision. On average patients returned to work by postoperative day six and resumed normal daily activities at seven days. Immediate postoperative complications included one incident of postoperative urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. One intra-operative cholangiogram was successfully performed due to elevated preoperative liver enzymes without significant findings. Long-term complications included one asymptomatic incisional hernia repair at the infraumbilical port site. The RAND-36 survey demonstrated an average physical and mental health summary score of 82.2 and 63.7 with an average general health score of 63.6. The average FSFI total score was 21.8.

Conclusion: TVC is safe and effective. Implementation may improve operational readiness by returning service members to normal activities more expeditiously than conventional laparoscopy.

目的:介绍我们在军事机构应用自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)技术为十名患者实施胆囊切除术的初步临床经验:我们介绍了在一家军事机构应用自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)技术为十名患者实施胆囊切除术的初步临床经验:方法: 建立后结肠造口,以容纳单部位工作端口,用于在脐下端口直视下进行解剖和胆囊移动。标本经阴道取出,在直视下用可吸收缝线缝合结肠造口。通过电话进行长期随访,使用两种广泛使用的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)调查方法评估生活质量,包括兰德-36 健康项目调查(1.0 版)1 和女性性功能指数(FSFI)2:10名女性接受了腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术(TVC),其中7名接受了长期随访。平均年龄为 28.9 岁(20-37 岁),手术适应症包括症状性胆石症(9 例)和胆道运动障碍(1 例)。平均手术时间为 129 分钟(95-180 分钟),中位失血量为 34 毫升(5-400 毫升)。手术中无转归,平均住院时间为 9.98 小时(2.4-28.8)。术后第三天的疼痛(模拟评分 1-10)非常轻微(平均 2.3),且仅限于脐下切口。患者平均在术后第六天恢复工作,七天后恢复正常的日常活动。术后即刻出现的并发症包括一次术后尿潴留,需要进行膀胱导尿。由于术前肝酶升高,成功进行了一次术中胆管造影,但未发现明显异常。长期并发症包括一次无症状的切口疝修补术,切口位于脐下端口部位。兰德-36调查显示,患者的平均身心健康总分为82.2分和63.7分,平均一般健康分为63.6分。FSFI 总分平均为 21.8 分:TVC安全有效。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,实施 TVC 可使军人更快恢复正常活动,从而改善战备状态。
{"title":"Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.","authors":"Carolyn Judge, Jesse Bandle, Andrew Wang, Kyle Gadbois, Amanda Simsiman, Robin Wood, Gordon Wisbach","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We present our initial clinical experience applying Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy in ten patients at a military institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A posterior colpotomy was created to accommodate a single site working port used to facilitate dissection and gallbladder mobilization under direct visualization via an infraumbilical port. The specimen was retrieved through the vagina and the colpotomy was closed with absorbable suture under direct visualization. Long-term follow up was performed over the phone to assess quality of life with 2 widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys including RAND-36 Health Item Survey (Version 1.0),<sup>1</sup> and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten women underwent a laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) with 7 available for long-term follow-up. The average age was 28.9 years (20-37) and the indications for surgery included symptomatic cholelithiasis (9) and biliary dyskinesia (1). The mean operative time was 129 mins (95-180), and median blood loss was 34 ml (5-400). There were no conversions and the average length of stay was 9.98 hours (2.4-28.8). Pain (analogue scale 1-10) on postoperative day three was minimal (mean 2.3) and was limited to the infraumbilical incision. On average patients returned to work by postoperative day six and resumed normal daily activities at seven days. Immediate postoperative complications included one incident of postoperative urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. One intra-operative cholangiogram was successfully performed due to elevated preoperative liver enzymes without significant findings. Long-term complications included one asymptomatic incisional hernia repair at the infraumbilical port site. The RAND-36 survey demonstrated an average physical and mental health summary score of 82.2 and 63.7 with an average general health score of 63.6. The average FSFI total score was 21.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TVC is safe and effective. Implementation may improve operational readiness by returning service members to normal activities more expeditiously than conventional laparoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984372/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1