首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Endoscopic Hemostatic Forceps High-Frequency Electrocoagulation on Peptic Ulcers and Dieulafoy. 内镜下止血钳高频电凝治疗消化性溃疡和双胍。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00030
Pengcheng Liao, Linfeng Du, Juan Liu, Qiuying Xiang

Background: Peptic ulcers are a common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In contrast, Dieulafoy's disease is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding may lead to hemorrhagic shock and threaten the patient's life. Achieving effective hemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding remains a challenge. This study determined the efficacy of endoscopic hemostatic forceps high-frequency (HF) electrocoagulation for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding caused by peptic ulcers and Dieulafoy's disease.

Method: A retrospective analysis was performed involving 84 patients with upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding caused by peptic ulcers and Dieulafoy's disease. The patients underwent endoscopic HF electrocoagulation treatment at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. The clinical data were collected and analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the 84 patients (53 men and 31 women) was 64.27 years. The main lesion sites were the duodenum (n = 37), gastric antrum (n = 28), and gastric body (n = 14). Among the 84 patients, 82 achieved hemostasis after endoscopic treatment with a success rate of 97.6%. The two patients in whom hemostasis was not achieved were treated with other methods and recovered well. The average time-to-hemostasis was 1.5 minutes. No complications, including perforation or rebleeding, occurred after treatment. During the 12-month follow period, no recurrent bleeding occurred in any of the patients.

Conclusion: Endoscopic hemostatic forceps HF electrocoagulation is a simple, effective, and reliable treatment for upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding caused by peptic ulcers and Dieulafoy's disease.

背景:消化性溃疡是上消化道出血的常见原因。相反,diulafoy病是上消化道出血的罕见原因。上消化道动脉出血可导致失血性休克,危及患者生命安全。在上消化道动脉出血患者中实现有效止血仍然是一个挑战。本研究确定了内镜下止血钳高频电凝治疗消化性溃疡和diulafoy病引起的上消化道动脉出血的疗效。方法:回顾性分析84例消化性溃疡合并diulafoy病合并上消化道动脉出血患者的临床资料。患者于2018年1月至2023年12月在我院接受了内窥镜高频电凝治疗。收集临床资料并进行分析。结果:84例患者(男53例,女31例)平均年龄64.27岁。主要病变部位为十二指肠(n = 37)、胃窦(n = 28)和胃体(n = 14)。84例患者中,经内镜治疗后止血82例,成功率97.6%。2例未止血的患者经其他方法治疗后均恢复良好。平均止血时间为1.5分钟。治疗后无穿孔、再出血等并发症发生。在12个月的随访期间,所有患者均未发生复发性出血。结论:内镜下止血钳HF电凝治疗消化性溃疡和diulafoy病所致上消化道动脉出血简便、有效、可靠。
{"title":"Endoscopic Hemostatic Forceps High-Frequency Electrocoagulation on Peptic Ulcers and Dieulafoy.","authors":"Pengcheng Liao, Linfeng Du, Juan Liu, Qiuying Xiang","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00030","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peptic ulcers are a common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In contrast, Dieulafoy's disease is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding may lead to hemorrhagic shock and threaten the patient's life. Achieving effective hemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding remains a challenge. This study determined the efficacy of endoscopic hemostatic forceps high-frequency (HF) electrocoagulation for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding caused by peptic ulcers and Dieulafoy's disease.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed involving 84 patients with upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding caused by peptic ulcers and Dieulafoy's disease. The patients underwent endoscopic HF electrocoagulation treatment at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. The clinical data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 84 patients (53 men and 31 women) was 64.27 years. The main lesion sites were the duodenum (n = 37), gastric antrum (n = 28), and gastric body (n = 14). Among the 84 patients, 82 achieved hemostasis after endoscopic treatment with a success rate of 97.6%. The two patients in whom hemostasis was not achieved were treated with other methods and recovered well. The average time-to-hemostasis was 1.5 minutes. No complications, including perforation or rebleeding, occurred after treatment. During the 12-month follow period, no recurrent bleeding occurred in any of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic hemostatic forceps HF electrocoagulation is a simple, effective, and reliable treatment for upper gastrointestinal arterial bleeding caused by peptic ulcers and Dieulafoy's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Surgery (vNOTES) and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation: Effects on Postoperative Pain, Sexual Functions, and Surgical Outcomes. 经阴道自然口手术(vNOTES)和腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的比较:对术后疼痛、性功能和手术结果的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00062
Mehmet Genco, Merve Genco, Feyza Azmak Çinaz, Semih Çinaz

Introduction: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimally invasive technique that eliminates the need for abdominal incisions. Compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL), vNOTES may offer reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. While laparoscopy is the standard method for bilateral tubal ligation (BTL), limited comparative data exist regarding vNOTES for this indication.

Aim: To compare postoperative outcomes, pain levels, and sexual function following BTL performed via vNOTES versus CL.

Material and methods: This retrospective comparative study included 43 women who underwent elective BTL between September 2023 and December 2024 (vNOTES: n = 23; CL: n = 20). Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Shoulder pain incidence, intra-abdominal pressure, need for intraoperative opioids, and 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) scores were also evaluated. Operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results: All procedures were completed without major complications. VAS pain scores at all measured time points were significantly lower in the vNOTES group (P < .05). Shoulder pain occurred in 15% of vNOTES cases versus 85% in the CL group (P < .001). Intra-abdominal pressure and intraoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower in the vNOTES group (P < .05). No significant differences were observed between groups in sexual function scores, operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay (P > .05).

Conclusions: vNOTES is a safe and effective alternative to CL for female sterilization. It offers significant benefits in terms of reduced early postoperative and shoulder pain, without negatively affecting sexual function or surgical safety. These findings highlight the potential advantages of vNOTES as a minimally invasive technique in gynecologic surgery.

阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)是一种新的微创技术,消除了对腹部切口的需要。与传统腹腔镜(CL)相比,vNOTES可以减少术后疼痛和更快的恢复。虽然腹腔镜是双侧输卵管结扎(BTL)的标准方法,但关于该指征的vNOTES的比较数据有限。目的:比较通过vNOTES和CL进行BTL的术后结果、疼痛水平和性功能。材料和方法:本回顾性比较研究包括43名在2023年9月至2024年12月期间接受选择性BTL治疗的女性(vNOTES: n = 23; CL: n = 20)。术后1、6、24小时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。同时评估肩痛发生率、腹内压、术中阿片类药物需求和6项女性性功能指数(FSFI-6)评分。记录手术时间、出血量和住院时间。结果:所有手术均顺利完成,无重大并发症。vNOTES组各测量时间点VAS疼痛评分均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:vNOTES是一种安全、有效的替代CL的女性绝育方法。它在减少术后早期和肩部疼痛方面提供了显著的好处,而不会对性功能或手术安全性产生负面影响。这些发现突出了vNOTES作为妇科手术微创技术的潜在优势。
{"title":"Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Surgery (vNOTES) and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation: Effects on Postoperative Pain, Sexual Functions, and Surgical Outcomes.","authors":"Mehmet Genco, Merve Genco, Feyza Azmak Çinaz, Semih Çinaz","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00062","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimally invasive technique that eliminates the need for abdominal incisions. Compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL), vNOTES may offer reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. While laparoscopy is the standard method for bilateral tubal ligation (BTL), limited comparative data exist regarding vNOTES for this indication.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare postoperative outcomes, pain levels, and sexual function following BTL performed via vNOTES versus CL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 43 women who underwent elective BTL between September 2023 and December 2024 (vNOTES: n = 23; CL: n = 20). Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Shoulder pain incidence, intra-abdominal pressure, need for intraoperative opioids, and 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) scores were also evaluated. Operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were completed without major complications. VAS pain scores at all measured time points were significantly lower in the vNOTES group (<i>P</i> < .05). Shoulder pain occurred in 15% of vNOTES cases versus 85% in the CL group (<i>P</i> < .001). Intra-abdominal pressure and intraoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower in the vNOTES group (<i>P</i> < .05). No significant differences were observed between groups in sexual function scores, operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>vNOTES is a safe and effective alternative to CL for female sterilization. It offers significant benefits in terms of reduced early postoperative and shoulder pain, without negatively affecting sexual function or surgical safety. These findings highlight the potential advantages of vNOTES as a minimally invasive technique in gynecologic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electronic Data Capture of Patient-Report Questionnaire in Patient Management in a Rural Population. 农村患者管理中患者报告问卷的电子数据采集。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00068
Hayley Harman, Ashleigh A Pona, Lawrence Tabone, Salim Abunnaja, Nova Szoka, Stephanie Cox

Background and objectives: Electronic data capture may enhance efficiency and patient engagement in preoperative psychosocial evaluations for metabolic and bariatric surgery yet concerns persist about its feasibility in rural populations with historically lower mobile health adoption. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of electronic patient-reported outcomes among metabolic and bariatric surgery patients in a rural setting.

Methods: In this quality improvement project, 202 patients undergoing presurgical psychosocial evaluation at an academic medical center in rural West Virginia completed a battery of psychological assessments on a clinic-provided tablet. Patients also completed a 9-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact on provider communication.

Results: Most patients reported high satisfaction with the tablet-based format (85%), and nearly all (96%) preferred it over paper-and-pencil forms. Usability ratings were strong, with the majority describing the tablet as "very easy" to read (86%), use (84%), and navigate (87%). Notably, 42% reported the tablet encouraged them to discuss eating or mental health concerns with their provider, and 49% indicated it helped them remember prior symptoms. Only 4% preferred paper-and-pencil assessments, and these patients were significantly older.

Conclusion: Tablet-based electronic patient-reported outcomes collection is a feasible and well-accepted method for presurgical psychosocial evaluations in rural metabolic and bariatric surgery patients. These findings challenge assumptions about digital hesitancy in rural populations and support broader implementation of electronic data capture in bariatric care workflows.

背景和目的:电子数据采集可以提高代谢和减肥手术术前社会心理评估的效率和患者参与度,但其在农村人口中的可行性仍然令人担忧,这些人口的流动医疗采用率历来较低。本研究评估了农村地区代谢和减肥手术患者电子报告结果的可行性和可接受性。方法:在这个质量改善项目中,202名在西弗吉尼亚州农村的学术医疗中心接受术前心理社会评估的患者在诊所提供的片剂上完成了一系列心理评估。患者还完成了一份9项问卷,评估满意度、可用性和对提供者沟通的感知影响。结果:大多数患者对基于平板电脑的格式(85%)表示高度满意,几乎所有(96%)的患者更喜欢它而不是纸和铅笔形式。用户对这款平板电脑的可用性评价很高,大多数人认为它“非常容易”阅读(86%)、使用(84%)和导航(87%)。值得注意的是,42%的人表示,这种药片鼓励他们与医生讨论饮食或心理健康问题,49%的人表示,它有助于他们记住以前的症状。只有4%的患者更喜欢纸笔评估,而且这些患者明显年龄较大。结论:基于平板电脑的电子患者报告结果收集是一种可行且被广泛接受的方法,用于农村代谢和减肥手术患者的术前社会心理评估。这些发现挑战了关于农村人口数字犹豫不决的假设,并支持在减肥护理工作流程中更广泛地实施电子数据采集。
{"title":"Electronic Data Capture of Patient-Report Questionnaire in Patient Management in a Rural Population.","authors":"Hayley Harman, Ashleigh A Pona, Lawrence Tabone, Salim Abunnaja, Nova Szoka, Stephanie Cox","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00068","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Electronic data capture may enhance efficiency and patient engagement in preoperative psychosocial evaluations for metabolic and bariatric surgery yet concerns persist about its feasibility in rural populations with historically lower mobile health adoption. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of electronic patient-reported outcomes among metabolic and bariatric surgery patients in a rural setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quality improvement project, 202 patients undergoing presurgical psychosocial evaluation at an academic medical center in rural West Virginia completed a battery of psychological assessments on a clinic-provided tablet. Patients also completed a 9-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact on provider communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients reported high satisfaction with the tablet-based format (85%), and nearly all (96%) preferred it over paper-and-pencil forms. Usability ratings were strong, with the majority describing the tablet as \"very easy\" to read (86%), use (84%), and navigate (87%). Notably, 42% reported the tablet encouraged them to discuss eating or mental health concerns with their provider, and 49% indicated it helped them remember prior symptoms. Only 4% preferred paper-and-pencil assessments, and these patients were significantly older.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tablet-based electronic patient-reported outcomes collection is a feasible and well-accepted method for presurgical psychosocial evaluations in rural metabolic and bariatric surgery patients. These findings challenge assumptions about digital hesitancy in rural populations and support broader implementation of electronic data capture in bariatric care workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409709/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145015712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability of Likert Scale for Surgeon-Rated Conspicuity of Ureters with Pudexacianinium Chloride (ASP5354). 用盐酸普地沙铵(ASP5354)评价输尿管外科手术评价显著性的Likert量表的可靠性。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00069
Chris Atzinger, Heather Dickerson, Ela Polek, Christiane Otto, Yanli Gao, Lin Liu, Anil Kumar, Gabriel P Haas

Background: Pudexacianinium chloride is a novel near-infrared fluorescence (NIR-F) imaging agent under evaluation for ureter visualization in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery.

Methods: Surgeons were trained to use the Likert scale. Each surgeon rated 36 color image pairs (white light and NIR-F on the same anatomical area) from the phase 2 trial (NCT04238481), in which adults undergoing abdominopelvic surgery received single doses of pudexacianinium. Surgeons rated a single-item question, "How conspicuous is the ureter?" using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = none (not self-evident) to 5 = excellent (extremely self-evident). Images were taken at the beginning (10-30 minutes postpudexacianinium, n = 18 pairs), middle (between 30 minutes postpudexacianinium and end of surgery, n = 13 pairs), and end of surgery (n = 5 pairs) and were displayed for 30 seconds. Inter-rater reliability at baseline and intra-rater reliability after 1 week from baseline were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with target values set a priori as 0.70 and 0.80 for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, respectively.

Results: Seventeen surgeons were enrolled and completed baseline ratings; 15 completed retest ratings. Mean (standard deviation) rating on the 5-point Likert scale with NIR-F was 3.77 (0.98) at baseline and 3.84 (0.97) at retest and 2.28 (0.98) at baseline and 2.16 (0.95) at retest with white light. Inter-rater reliability ICC was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63, 0.78) and intra-rater reliability ICC was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.84).

Conclusions: The 5-point Likert scale had adequate inter- and intra-rater reliability among surgeons for assessing ureter conspicuity in patients who received pudexacianinium during abdominopelvic surgery.

背景:氯化普地沙铵是一种新型近红外荧光(NIR-F)显像剂,目前正在评估其在骨盆手术患者输尿管显像中的应用。方法:训练外科医生使用李克特量表。每位外科医生对来自2期试验(NCT04238481)的36对彩色图像(白光和NIR-F在同一解剖区域)进行评分,在该试验中,接受骨盆手术的成年人接受单剂量的pudexacianinium。外科医生用李克特5分制对“输尿管有多显眼?”这一单项问题进行评分,从1 =无(不明显)到5 =极好(非常明显)。影像分别于开始(服药后10-30分钟,n = 18对)、中间(服药后30分钟至手术结束,n = 13对)和手术结束(n = 5对)拍摄,显示30秒。基线时的评分者间信度和基线后1周的评分者内信度采用类内相关系数(ICCs)进行评估,评分者间信度和评分者内信度的目标值分别为0.70和0.80。结果:17名外科医生入选并完成基线评分;15个完成重测等级。使用NIR-F的5点李克特量表的平均(标准差)评分为基线时3.77(0.98),重测时3.84(0.97),白光时基线时2.28(0.98),重测时2.16(0.95)。评估间信度ICC为0.70(95%可信区间[CI] = 0.63, 0.78),评估内信度ICC为0.82 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.84)。结论:5分Likert量表在外科医生之间具有足够的可靠性,用于评估在骨盆手术中接受pudexacianium治疗的患者输尿管显著性。
{"title":"Reliability of Likert Scale for Surgeon-Rated Conspicuity of Ureters with Pudexacianinium Chloride (ASP5354).","authors":"Chris Atzinger, Heather Dickerson, Ela Polek, Christiane Otto, Yanli Gao, Lin Liu, Anil Kumar, Gabriel P Haas","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00069","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pudexacianinium chloride is a novel near-infrared fluorescence (NIR-F) imaging agent under evaluation for ureter visualization in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgeons were trained to use the Likert scale. Each surgeon rated 36 color image pairs (white light and NIR-F on the same anatomical area) from the phase 2 trial (NCT04238481), in which adults undergoing abdominopelvic surgery received single doses of pudexacianinium. Surgeons rated a single-item question, \"How conspicuous is the ureter?\" using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = none (not self-evident) to 5 = excellent (extremely self-evident). Images were taken at the beginning (10-30 minutes postpudexacianinium, n = 18 pairs), middle (between 30 minutes postpudexacianinium and end of surgery, n = 13 pairs), and end of surgery (n = 5 pairs) and were displayed for 30 seconds. Inter-rater reliability at baseline and intra-rater reliability after 1 week from baseline were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with target values set a priori as 0.70 and 0.80 for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen surgeons were enrolled and completed baseline ratings; 15 completed retest ratings. Mean (standard deviation) rating on the 5-point Likert scale with NIR-F was 3.77 (0.98) at baseline and 3.84 (0.97) at retest and 2.28 (0.98) at baseline and 2.16 (0.95) at retest with white light. Inter-rater reliability ICC was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63, 0.78) and intra-rater reliability ICC was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 5-point Likert scale had adequate inter- and intra-rater reliability among surgeons for assessing ureter conspicuity in patients who received pudexacianinium during abdominopelvic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144642890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery. 清晰的视觉,清晰的节省:提高微创手术的效率。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023
Juslyn Dhingra, Noah Beinart, Abraar Ahmed, Mansi Patel, Aysha Ameerah, Maansi Srinivasan, Christopher R Idelson, John M Uecker

Background and objectives: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers faster recovery and smaller incisions but is limited by persistent visualization issues such as lens fogging, debris, and camera instability. These challenges compromise surgical performance, increase complications, and elevate healthcare costs. This review evaluates the clinical and economic impact of suboptimal visualization in MIS and explores potential solutions.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using peer-reviewed literature from January 1990 to August 2024. Studies included those examining visualization challenges in laparoscopic and robotic MIS, clinical outcomes, surgeon-reported frustrations, and cost analyses. Exclusion criteria included studies with significant conflicts of interest, especially those funded by medical device companies.

Results: Surgeons spend an estimated 40% of MIS operating time under suboptimal visual conditions, contributing to nearly 20% of surgical complications. Lens cleaning adds $132-$493 per procedure, averaging $312.53 based on 9.7 cleaning events per case. Visualization-related complications contribute an additional $251 per case. Combined, these issues result in over $2.2 billion in annual costs in the U.S. Poor visualization also disrupts workflow, increases surgeon fatigue, and hinders integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI).

Conclusions: Suboptimal visualization in MIS stands to significantly affect patient safety and healthcare costs. Addressing these challenges through standardized cleaning protocols, improved surgeon training, and adoption of advanced technologies-including AI-driven imaging-is essential. Enhancing visualization is not just a technical upgrade but a critical step toward safer, more efficient, and cost-effective surgical care.

背景和目的:微创手术(MIS)提供更快的恢复和更小的切口,但受到持续可视化问题的限制,如透镜雾化、碎片和相机不稳定。这些挑战降低了手术性能,增加了并发症,并提高了医疗成本。本综述评估了MIS中次优可视化的临床和经济影响,并探讨了潜在的解决方案。方法:对1990年1月至2024年8月的同行评议文献进行系统回顾。研究包括检查腹腔镜和机器人管理信息系统的可视化挑战、临床结果、外科医生报告的挫折和成本分析。排除标准包括有重大利益冲突的研究,特别是那些由医疗器械公司资助的研究。结果:外科医生在视力不佳的情况下花费了大约40%的MIS手术时间,导致了近20%的手术并发症。每次清洗镜片要花费132- 493美元,平均每次清洗9.7次要花费312.53美元。与视觉相关的并发症每例额外收费251美元。这些问题加在一起,导致美国每年超过22亿美元的成本。糟糕的可视化还会扰乱工作流程,增加外科医生的疲劳,并阻碍人工智能(AI)等新兴技术的整合。结论:MIS的次优可视化会显著影响患者安全和医疗成本。通过标准化的清洁方案、改进的外科医生培训和采用先进技术(包括人工智能驱动的成像)来解决这些挑战至关重要。增强可视化不仅是一项技术升级,而且是迈向更安全、更有效和更具成本效益的外科护理的关键一步。
{"title":"Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.","authors":"Juslyn Dhingra, Noah Beinart, Abraar Ahmed, Mansi Patel, Aysha Ameerah, Maansi Srinivasan, Christopher R Idelson, John M Uecker","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers faster recovery and smaller incisions but is limited by persistent visualization issues such as lens fogging, debris, and camera instability. These challenges compromise surgical performance, increase complications, and elevate healthcare costs. This review evaluates the clinical and economic impact of suboptimal visualization in MIS and explores potential solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using peer-reviewed literature from January 1990 to August 2024. Studies included those examining visualization challenges in laparoscopic and robotic MIS, clinical outcomes, surgeon-reported frustrations, and cost analyses. Exclusion criteria included studies with significant conflicts of interest, especially those funded by medical device companies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgeons spend an estimated 40% of MIS operating time under suboptimal visual conditions, contributing to nearly 20% of surgical complications. Lens cleaning adds $132-$493 per procedure, averaging $312.53 based on 9.7 cleaning events per case. Visualization-related complications contribute an additional $251 per case. Combined, these issues result in over $2.2 billion in annual costs in the U.S. Poor visualization also disrupts workflow, increases surgeon fatigue, and hinders integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Suboptimal visualization in MIS stands to significantly affect patient safety and healthcare costs. Addressing these challenges through standardized cleaning protocols, improved surgeon training, and adoption of advanced technologies-including AI-driven imaging-is essential. Enhancing visualization is not just a technical upgrade but a critical step toward safer, more efficient, and cost-effective surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257872/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144642889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inflammatory Reaction and Formation of Adhesions after Intraperitoneal Application of Biological SIS Mesh. 生物SIS补片腹腔内应用后的炎症反应及粘连形成。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059
Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic

Background: Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.

Methods: Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.

Results: There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.

Conclusion: This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.

背景:来源于猪小肠黏膜下层(SIS)的生物补片比来源于牛和牛皮肤组织的补片具有更高的孔隙度和亲水性。因此,我们认为SIS网将导致比其他,聚丙烯和聚丙烯-聚二氧环酮网更温和的炎症反应,更少的粘连,更少的网收缩。方法:90只大鼠随机分为3组:1组植入聚丙烯网片;第2组为聚丙烯-聚二氧杂环酮;第三组为SIS网。网状物固定在腹部内,位于腹部上部。各组分别于植入后第7、28、60天处死10只。再开腹手术,左侧旁切口,根据外科膜研究组(SMSG)评分评估粘连形成情况,以及补片收缩百分比和任何炎症。结果:植入后第7天,两组间的炎症反应及粘连形成均无差异。而SIS网的收缩更明显。在第28天和第60天,与其他网片相比,SIS网片引起的炎症反应和粘连形成较少。第60天,两组间网目尺寸无显著差异。结论:本研究证实,尽管对生物补片有不同的看法,但SIS补片炎症反应少,粘连形成少,收缩程度小,可以替代其在疝修补中的作用。
{"title":"Inflammatory Reaction and Formation of Adhesions after Intraperitoneal Application of Biological SIS Mesh.","authors":"Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correspondence on "Assessing Immersive Virtual Reality as Learning Tool for Surgical Trainees". “评估沉浸式虚拟现实作为外科培训生的学习工具”的通信。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00051
Daungsupawong Hinpetch, Wiwanitkit Viroj
{"title":"Correspondence on \"Assessing Immersive Virtual Reality as Learning Tool for Surgical Trainees\".","authors":"Daungsupawong Hinpetch, Wiwanitkit Viroj","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00051","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus Open for Simultaneous Surgery of Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis. 结直肠癌和肝转移同时手术的机器人与开放式:一项荟萃分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00047
Bruna Oliveira Trindade, Patrícia Marcolin, Valberto Sanha, Sarah Bueno Motter, Gabriela Rangel Brandão, Dante L S Souza, Antonio Nocchi Kalil, Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja

Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare robotic versus open simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases.

Methods: On June 3, 2024, we searched on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework. The population included patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. The intervention was robotic-assisted surgical resection, compared to open surgical resection as the control group. The outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, mortality, operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, intestinal anastomotic leakage, and bile leakage. Two authors independently extracted data regarding the characteristics of each study. We assess risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool and RoB 2 tool.

Results: We included 4 studies with 1,722 patients, of whom 210 (12.2%) underwent a robotic surgery approach. The intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] -87.48 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-103.76, -71.21]; P < .0001) and postoperative hospital stay (MD -2.13 days; 95% CI [-2.99, -1.27]; P < .0001) were significantly lower in patients treated by the robotic approach. Operative time was higher in the robotic surgery group (MD 48.87 minutes; 95% CI [21.23, 76.50]; P = .0005). The incidence of intestinal anastomotic leakage and bile leakage had no significant difference.

Discussion: This study provides evidence that robotic approaches yield improved outcomes for patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

背景:我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,比较了机器人与开放式同时切除结直肠癌和结直肠癌肝转移的疗效。方法:我们于2024年6月3日在PubMed, Embase和Cochrane检索。资格标准遵循PICO框架。人群包括同时切除结直肠癌和肝转移的患者。干预措施为机器人辅助手术切除,对照组为开放手术切除。结果包括术后住院时间、死亡率、手术时间、术中估计出血量、肠吻合口漏和胆汁漏。两位作者独立地提取了关于每项研究特征的数据。我们使用ROBINS-I工具和rob2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了4项研究,共1722例患者,其中210例(12.2%)采用了机器人手术方法。采用机器人入路治疗的患者术中出血量(平均差[MD] -87.48 mL; 95%可信区间[CI] [-103.76, -71.21]; P < 0.0001)和术后住院时间(MD -2.13天;95% CI [-2.99, -1.27]; P < 0.0001)均显著降低。机器人手术组手术时间更长(MD 48.87 min; 95% CI [21.23, 76.50]; P = 0.0005)。两组吻合口瘘发生率和胆漏发生率无显著性差异。讨论:这项研究提供了证据,证明机器人方法可以改善结肠直肠癌和肝转移同时切除的患者的预后。
{"title":"Robotic versus Open for Simultaneous Surgery of Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bruna Oliveira Trindade, Patrícia Marcolin, Valberto Sanha, Sarah Bueno Motter, Gabriela Rangel Brandão, Dante L S Souza, Antonio Nocchi Kalil, Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00047","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare robotic versus open simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On June 3, 2024, we searched on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework. The population included patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. The intervention was robotic-assisted surgical resection, compared to open surgical resection as the control group. The outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, mortality, operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, intestinal anastomotic leakage, and bile leakage. Two authors independently extracted data regarding the characteristics of each study. We assess risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool and RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 studies with 1,722 patients, of whom 210 (12.2%) underwent a robotic surgery approach. The intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] -87.48 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-103.76, -71.21]; <i>P</i> < .0001) and postoperative hospital stay (MD -2.13 days; 95% CI [-2.99, -1.27]; <i>P</i> < .0001) were significantly lower in patients treated by the robotic approach. Operative time was higher in the robotic surgery group (MD 48.87 minutes; 95% CI [21.23, 76.50]; <i>P</i> = .0005). The incidence of intestinal anastomotic leakage and bile leakage had no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides evidence that robotic approaches yield improved outcomes for patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12668432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Trio of Atypical Ectopic Pregnancies. 三例非典型异位妊娠。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00072
Bruce Lee, Emery M Salom, Alexa Marie Del Mazo

Three cases of atypical ectopic pregnancies requiring surgical evaluation are presented. The first case represents an undiagnosed heterotopic pregnancy who initially presented with a 1st trimester spontaneous abortion and subsequently a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The second case represents an omental ectopic pregnancy vs an extruded tubal ectopic pregnancy following a salpingectomy requiring omentectomy and appendectomy. The third case showcases a chronic cornual ectopic pregnancy incidentally found during a robotic myomectomy. These cases highlight uncommon presentations of atypical ectopic pregnancies, diagnostic challenges, and surgical treatment.

三例不典型异位妊娠需要手术评估提出。第一例为未确诊的异位妊娠,最初表现为妊娠早期自然流产,随后异位妊娠破裂。第二例为大网膜异位妊娠与输卵管膨出性异位妊娠,输卵管切除术后需要大网膜切除术和阑尾切除术。第三例显示慢性角异位妊娠偶然发现在机器人子宫肌瘤切除术。这些病例突出了不典型异位妊娠的罕见表现,诊断挑战和手术治疗。
{"title":"A Trio of Atypical Ectopic Pregnancies.","authors":"Bruce Lee, Emery M Salom, Alexa Marie Del Mazo","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00072","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three cases of atypical ectopic pregnancies requiring surgical evaluation are presented. The first case represents an undiagnosed heterotopic pregnancy who initially presented with a 1<sup>st</sup> trimester spontaneous abortion and subsequently a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The second case represents an omental ectopic pregnancy vs an extruded tubal ectopic pregnancy following a salpingectomy requiring omentectomy and appendectomy. The third case showcases a chronic cornual ectopic pregnancy incidentally found during a robotic myomectomy. These cases highlight uncommon presentations of atypical ectopic pregnancies, diagnostic challenges, and surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419787/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Urethrovesical Anastomotic Leakage on Incontinence Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. 尿道膀胱吻合口瘘对机器人根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006
Mert Kilic, Serdar Madendere, Ersin Koseoglu, Arzu Baygül, Mevlana D Balbay

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) on urinary incontinence (UI) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods: Data from 86 patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Cystography was performed on the seventh day, and urinary catheters were removed for patients with mild leakage. For patients with major leakage, cystography was repeated on the 14th day. Patients with UI and those using pads were identified separately and assessed for associated risk factors.

Results: The UAL rate was 32.6%, with an equal division between minor and major UAL. The average an follow-up period was 36 ± 22 months. UI was present in 28 patients (32.6%), of whom 11 (12.8%) required pads, while 17 patients (19.8%) had mild UI and did not use pads. Seventy-five patients (87.2%) did not use pads. Among pad users, 6 (7.0%) used 1 pad, 2 (2.3%) used 2 pads, and 3 (3.5%) used 3 pads daily. UAL did not significantly impact UI (P = .479), and no significant relationship was found between major UAL and UI (P = .727). None of the demographic or perioperative variables were associated with UI. Comparison between pad users and nonpad users revealed that neither UAL nor major UAL was a significant factor (P = .743 and P = .290, respectively).

Conclusion: UAL was not found to influence mid to long-term UI. However, in patients with major UAL, prolonged catheterization may have a protective effect against UI. Randomized studies comparing catheter removal on the seventh day versus later removal in patients with UAL could provide further insight.

目的:探讨机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)患者尿道膀胱吻合口漏(UAL)对尿失禁(UI)的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2023年间86例RARP患者的资料。第7天行膀胱造影,轻度渗漏者拔除导尿管。对于严重渗漏的患者,第14天再次进行膀胱造影。尿失禁患者和使用尿垫的患者分别被确定并评估相关危险因素。结果:UAL发生率为32.6%,轻度UAL与重度UAL平分。平均随访36±22个月。28例(32.6%)患者出现尿失禁,其中11例(12.8%)患者需要使用尿失禁,17例(19.8%)患者有轻度尿失禁,未使用尿失禁。75例(87.2%)患者未使用卫生巾。在pad使用者中,6人(7.0%)使用1个pad, 2人(2.3%)使用2个pad, 3人(3.5%)每天使用3个pad。UAL对UI无显著影响(P = .479),重度UAL与UI无显著相关(P = .727)。没有人口统计学或围手术期变量与UI相关。pad使用者和非pad使用者的比较显示UAL和主要UAL都不是显著因素(P = .743和P = .290)。结论:UAL对中长期尿失禁无影响。然而,对于严重尿失禁的患者,延长导尿时间可能对尿失禁有保护作用。比较UAL患者在第7天拔除导管与之后拔除导管的随机研究可以提供进一步的见解。
{"title":"Effect of Urethrovesical Anastomotic Leakage on Incontinence Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Mert Kilic, Serdar Madendere, Ersin Koseoglu, Arzu Baygül, Mevlana D Balbay","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) on urinary incontinence (UI) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 86 patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Cystography was performed on the seventh day, and urinary catheters were removed for patients with mild leakage. For patients with major leakage, cystography was repeated on the 14th day. Patients with UI and those using pads were identified separately and assessed for associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UAL rate was 32.6%, with an equal division between minor and major UAL. The average an follow-up period was 36 ± 22 months. UI was present in 28 patients (32.6%), of whom 11 (12.8%) required pads, while 17 patients (19.8%) had mild UI and did not use pads. Seventy-five patients (87.2%) did not use pads. Among pad users, 6 (7.0%) used 1 pad, 2 (2.3%) used 2 pads, and 3 (3.5%) used 3 pads daily. UAL did not significantly impact UI (<i>P</i> = .479), and no significant relationship was found between major UAL and UI (<i>P</i> = .727). None of the demographic or perioperative variables were associated with UI. Comparison between pad users and nonpad users revealed that neither UAL nor major UAL was a significant factor (<i>P</i> = .743 and <i>P</i> = .290, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UAL was not found to influence mid to long-term UI. However, in patients with major UAL, prolonged catheterization may have a protective effect against UI. Randomized studies comparing catheter removal on the seventh day versus later removal in patients with UAL could provide further insight.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12668433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1