首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Correspondence on "Assessing Immersive Virtual Reality as Learning Tool for Surgical Trainees". “评估沉浸式虚拟现实作为外科培训生的学习工具”的通信。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00051
Daungsupawong Hinpetch, Wiwanitkit Viroj
{"title":"Correspondence on \"Assessing Immersive Virtual Reality as Learning Tool for Surgical Trainees\".","authors":"Daungsupawong Hinpetch, Wiwanitkit Viroj","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00051","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus Open for Simultaneous Surgery of Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis. 结直肠癌和肝转移同时手术的机器人与开放式:一项荟萃分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00047
Bruna Oliveira Trindade, Patrícia Marcolin, Valberto Sanha, Sarah Bueno Motter, Gabriela Rangel Brandão, Dante L S Souza, Antonio Nocchi Kalil, Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja

Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare robotic versus open simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases.

Methods: On June 3, 2024, we searched on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework. The population included patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. The intervention was robotic-assisted surgical resection, compared to open surgical resection as the control group. The outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, mortality, operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, intestinal anastomotic leakage, and bile leakage. Two authors independently extracted data regarding the characteristics of each study. We assess risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool and RoB 2 tool.

Results: We included 4 studies with 1,722 patients, of whom 210 (12.2%) underwent a robotic surgery approach. The intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] -87.48 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-103.76, -71.21]; P < .0001) and postoperative hospital stay (MD -2.13 days; 95% CI [-2.99, -1.27]; P < .0001) were significantly lower in patients treated by the robotic approach. Operative time was higher in the robotic surgery group (MD 48.87 minutes; 95% CI [21.23, 76.50]; P = .0005). The incidence of intestinal anastomotic leakage and bile leakage had no significant difference.

Discussion: This study provides evidence that robotic approaches yield improved outcomes for patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

背景:我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,比较了机器人与开放式同时切除结直肠癌和结直肠癌肝转移的疗效。方法:我们于2024年6月3日在PubMed, Embase和Cochrane检索。资格标准遵循PICO框架。人群包括同时切除结直肠癌和肝转移的患者。干预措施为机器人辅助手术切除,对照组为开放手术切除。结果包括术后住院时间、死亡率、手术时间、术中估计出血量、肠吻合口漏和胆汁漏。两位作者独立地提取了关于每项研究特征的数据。我们使用ROBINS-I工具和rob2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了4项研究,共1722例患者,其中210例(12.2%)采用了机器人手术方法。采用机器人入路治疗的患者术中出血量(平均差[MD] -87.48 mL; 95%可信区间[CI] [-103.76, -71.21]; P < 0.0001)和术后住院时间(MD -2.13天;95% CI [-2.99, -1.27]; P < 0.0001)均显著降低。机器人手术组手术时间更长(MD 48.87 min; 95% CI [21.23, 76.50]; P = 0.0005)。两组吻合口瘘发生率和胆漏发生率无显著性差异。讨论:这项研究提供了证据,证明机器人方法可以改善结肠直肠癌和肝转移同时切除的患者的预后。
{"title":"Robotic versus Open for Simultaneous Surgery of Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bruna Oliveira Trindade, Patrícia Marcolin, Valberto Sanha, Sarah Bueno Motter, Gabriela Rangel Brandão, Dante L S Souza, Antonio Nocchi Kalil, Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00047","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare robotic versus open simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On June 3, 2024, we searched on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework. The population included patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. The intervention was robotic-assisted surgical resection, compared to open surgical resection as the control group. The outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, mortality, operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, intestinal anastomotic leakage, and bile leakage. Two authors independently extracted data regarding the characteristics of each study. We assess risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool and RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 studies with 1,722 patients, of whom 210 (12.2%) underwent a robotic surgery approach. The intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] -87.48 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-103.76, -71.21]; <i>P</i> < .0001) and postoperative hospital stay (MD -2.13 days; 95% CI [-2.99, -1.27]; <i>P</i> < .0001) were significantly lower in patients treated by the robotic approach. Operative time was higher in the robotic surgery group (MD 48.87 minutes; 95% CI [21.23, 76.50]; <i>P</i> = .0005). The incidence of intestinal anastomotic leakage and bile leakage had no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides evidence that robotic approaches yield improved outcomes for patients undergoing simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12668432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Trio of Atypical Ectopic Pregnancies. 三例非典型异位妊娠。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00072
Bruce Lee, Emery M Salom, Alexa Marie Del Mazo

Three cases of atypical ectopic pregnancies requiring surgical evaluation are presented. The first case represents an undiagnosed heterotopic pregnancy who initially presented with a 1st trimester spontaneous abortion and subsequently a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The second case represents an omental ectopic pregnancy vs an extruded tubal ectopic pregnancy following a salpingectomy requiring omentectomy and appendectomy. The third case showcases a chronic cornual ectopic pregnancy incidentally found during a robotic myomectomy. These cases highlight uncommon presentations of atypical ectopic pregnancies, diagnostic challenges, and surgical treatment.

三例不典型异位妊娠需要手术评估提出。第一例为未确诊的异位妊娠,最初表现为妊娠早期自然流产,随后异位妊娠破裂。第二例为大网膜异位妊娠与输卵管膨出性异位妊娠,输卵管切除术后需要大网膜切除术和阑尾切除术。第三例显示慢性角异位妊娠偶然发现在机器人子宫肌瘤切除术。这些病例突出了不典型异位妊娠的罕见表现,诊断挑战和手术治疗。
{"title":"A Trio of Atypical Ectopic Pregnancies.","authors":"Bruce Lee, Emery M Salom, Alexa Marie Del Mazo","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00072","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three cases of atypical ectopic pregnancies requiring surgical evaluation are presented. The first case represents an undiagnosed heterotopic pregnancy who initially presented with a 1<sup>st</sup> trimester spontaneous abortion and subsequently a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The second case represents an omental ectopic pregnancy vs an extruded tubal ectopic pregnancy following a salpingectomy requiring omentectomy and appendectomy. The third case showcases a chronic cornual ectopic pregnancy incidentally found during a robotic myomectomy. These cases highlight uncommon presentations of atypical ectopic pregnancies, diagnostic challenges, and surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419787/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Urethrovesical Anastomotic Leakage on Incontinence Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. 尿道膀胱吻合口瘘对机器人根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006
Mert Kilic, Serdar Madendere, Ersin Koseoglu, Arzu Baygül, Mevlana D Balbay

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) on urinary incontinence (UI) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods: Data from 86 patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Cystography was performed on the seventh day, and urinary catheters were removed for patients with mild leakage. For patients with major leakage, cystography was repeated on the 14th day. Patients with UI and those using pads were identified separately and assessed for associated risk factors.

Results: The UAL rate was 32.6%, with an equal division between minor and major UAL. The average an follow-up period was 36 ± 22 months. UI was present in 28 patients (32.6%), of whom 11 (12.8%) required pads, while 17 patients (19.8%) had mild UI and did not use pads. Seventy-five patients (87.2%) did not use pads. Among pad users, 6 (7.0%) used 1 pad, 2 (2.3%) used 2 pads, and 3 (3.5%) used 3 pads daily. UAL did not significantly impact UI (P = .479), and no significant relationship was found between major UAL and UI (P = .727). None of the demographic or perioperative variables were associated with UI. Comparison between pad users and nonpad users revealed that neither UAL nor major UAL was a significant factor (P = .743 and P = .290, respectively).

Conclusion: UAL was not found to influence mid to long-term UI. However, in patients with major UAL, prolonged catheterization may have a protective effect against UI. Randomized studies comparing catheter removal on the seventh day versus later removal in patients with UAL could provide further insight.

目的:探讨机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)患者尿道膀胱吻合口漏(UAL)对尿失禁(UI)的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2023年间86例RARP患者的资料。第7天行膀胱造影,轻度渗漏者拔除导尿管。对于严重渗漏的患者,第14天再次进行膀胱造影。尿失禁患者和使用尿垫的患者分别被确定并评估相关危险因素。结果:UAL发生率为32.6%,轻度UAL与重度UAL平分。平均随访36±22个月。28例(32.6%)患者出现尿失禁,其中11例(12.8%)患者需要使用尿失禁,17例(19.8%)患者有轻度尿失禁,未使用尿失禁。75例(87.2%)患者未使用卫生巾。在pad使用者中,6人(7.0%)使用1个pad, 2人(2.3%)使用2个pad, 3人(3.5%)每天使用3个pad。UAL对UI无显著影响(P = .479),重度UAL与UI无显著相关(P = .727)。没有人口统计学或围手术期变量与UI相关。pad使用者和非pad使用者的比较显示UAL和主要UAL都不是显著因素(P = .743和P = .290)。结论:UAL对中长期尿失禁无影响。然而,对于严重尿失禁的患者,延长导尿时间可能对尿失禁有保护作用。比较UAL患者在第7天拔除导管与之后拔除导管的随机研究可以提供进一步的见解。
{"title":"Effect of Urethrovesical Anastomotic Leakage on Incontinence Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Mert Kilic, Serdar Madendere, Ersin Koseoglu, Arzu Baygül, Mevlana D Balbay","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) on urinary incontinence (UI) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 86 patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Cystography was performed on the seventh day, and urinary catheters were removed for patients with mild leakage. For patients with major leakage, cystography was repeated on the 14th day. Patients with UI and those using pads were identified separately and assessed for associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UAL rate was 32.6%, with an equal division between minor and major UAL. The average an follow-up period was 36 ± 22 months. UI was present in 28 patients (32.6%), of whom 11 (12.8%) required pads, while 17 patients (19.8%) had mild UI and did not use pads. Seventy-five patients (87.2%) did not use pads. Among pad users, 6 (7.0%) used 1 pad, 2 (2.3%) used 2 pads, and 3 (3.5%) used 3 pads daily. UAL did not significantly impact UI (<i>P</i> = .479), and no significant relationship was found between major UAL and UI (<i>P</i> = .727). None of the demographic or perioperative variables were associated with UI. Comparison between pad users and nonpad users revealed that neither UAL nor major UAL was a significant factor (<i>P</i> = .743 and <i>P</i> = .290, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UAL was not found to influence mid to long-term UI. However, in patients with major UAL, prolonged catheterization may have a protective effect against UI. Randomized studies comparing catheter removal on the seventh day versus later removal in patients with UAL could provide further insight.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12668433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Experiences with Standard Behavioral Restrictions after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术后标准行为限制的患者经验。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00035
R Gina Silverstein, Katie LeCroy, Noor Dasouki Abu-Alnadi, Erin Carey, Asha McClurg

Background and objectives: After hysterectomy, patients are counseled on behavioral limitation, such as avoiding vaginal intercourse and heavy lifting, to try to optimize healing. There are limited data on the benefits of these restrictions and on the impact on patients. This study aimed to evaluate patients' adherence to and perception of behavioral restrictions after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey study of patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy and completed the survey at their postoperative appointment between January 3 and March 31, 2023. Patients had been counseled to avoid submersion in water, strenuous exercise, and lifting > 10 pounds for at least 6 weeks, and to avoid vaginal penetration for 12 weeks after surgery. Convenience sampling was used.

Results: A total of 71 patients were eligible and 50 (70%) participated. The mean time to postoperative appointment was 32 days. Participants reported inconsistent adherence to behavioral guidelines. 49/50 (98%) patients avoided vaginal penetration, 46/50 (92%) avoided submerging in water, 21/49 (43%) avoided lifting > 10 pounds. Within 4 weeks, > 90% of patients returned to driving, housework, and shopping and 21/36 (58%) of employed patients returned to work. 21/47(45%) of participants reported that adhering to postoperative restrictions was at least "a little bit challenging," with home responsibilities cited as the primary challenge.

Conclusion: Patients inconsistently followed behavioral restrictions after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and described them as difficult to follow due to other responsibilities. Future studies should explore the necessity of postoperative restrictions and strategies for improving adherence to restrictions that optimize patient safety.

背景和目的:子宫切除术后,患者被告知行为限制,如避免阴道性交和举重,以尽量优化愈合。关于这些限制的益处和对患者的影响的数据有限。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜全子宫切除术后患者对行为限制的依从性和感知。方法:对2023年1月3日至3月31日接受腹腔镜全子宫切除术的患者进行横断面调查研究,并于术后预约完成调查。建议患者在术后至少6周内避免浸泡在水中、剧烈运动和举起bbb10磅,并在术后12周内避免阴道插入。采用方便抽样。结果:共有71例患者入选,其中50例(70%)参与了研究。术后平均预约时间为32天。参与者报告了对行为准则的不一致遵守。49/50(98%)的患者避免阴道插入,46/50(92%)的患者避免浸入水中,21/49(43%)的患者避免举起bb10磅。在4周内,90%的患者恢复驾驶、家务和购物,21%(58%)的受雇患者恢复工作。21/47(45%)的参与者报告说,坚持术后限制至少“有点挑战”,家庭责任被认为是主要的挑战。结论:患者在腹腔镜全子宫切除术后不一致地遵守行为限制,并描述由于其他责任而难以遵守。未来的研究应探讨术后限制的必要性和提高对限制的依从性以优化患者安全的策略。
{"title":"Patient Experiences with Standard Behavioral Restrictions after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"R Gina Silverstein, Katie LeCroy, Noor Dasouki Abu-Alnadi, Erin Carey, Asha McClurg","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00035","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>After hysterectomy, patients are counseled on behavioral limitation, such as avoiding vaginal intercourse and heavy lifting, to try to optimize healing. There are limited data on the benefits of these restrictions and on the impact on patients. This study aimed to evaluate patients' adherence to and perception of behavioral restrictions after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study of patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy and completed the survey at their postoperative appointment between January 3 and March 31, 2023. Patients had been counseled to avoid submersion in water, strenuous exercise, and lifting > 10 pounds for at least 6 weeks, and to avoid vaginal penetration for 12 weeks after surgery. Convenience sampling was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 patients were eligible and 50 (70%) participated. The mean time to postoperative appointment was 32 days. Participants reported inconsistent adherence to behavioral guidelines. 49/50 (98%) patients avoided vaginal penetration, 46/50 (92%) avoided submerging in water, 21/49 (43%) avoided lifting > 10 pounds. Within 4 weeks, > 90% of patients returned to driving, housework, and shopping and 21/36 (58%) of employed patients returned to work. 21/47(45%) of participants reported that adhering to postoperative restrictions was at least \"a little bit challenging,\" with home responsibilities cited as the primary challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients inconsistently followed behavioral restrictions after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and described them as difficult to follow due to other responsibilities. Future studies should explore the necessity of postoperative restrictions and strategies for improving adherence to restrictions that optimize patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453009/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation on Pulmonary Function in Coal Workers with Pneumoconiosis Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 控压保气量通气对煤工尘肺腹腔镜胆囊切除术肺功能的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00032
Junfeng Zhang, Bin Li, Jiangbo Qu, Yanan Li, Jiahui Liu, Huibin Mao

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of the pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) mode on pulmonary function in patients with pneumoconiosis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: Forty patients with pneumoconiosis scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method: the PCV-VG mode group and the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode group. The primary outcome was lung ultrasound score (LUS) after entering the operating room (T0), at the end of surgery (T3), 30 minutes after tracheal extubation (T4), and 2 hours postoperatively (T5). Peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and plateau pressure (Pplat) were recorded 2 minutes before (T1) and 20 minutes after the initiation of artificial pneumoperitoneum (T2). Arterial blood gas analyses were performed at T0, T2, and T4 to calculate the oxygenation index (OI).

Results: Compared to the VCV group (n = 20), the PCV-VG group (n = 20) exhibited significantly improvement of median LUS at T3, T4, and T5 (all P < .05). Significantly lower Ppeak and Pplat were found in PCV-VG group at T1 (16.2 ± 1.81 and 14.6 ± 1.85) and T2 (24.3 ± 2.75 and 19.7 ± 3.08) (P < .05). Additionally, median OI significantly improved at T2 and T4 in PCV-VG group (P < .05). No early postoperative pulmonary complications were found in both groups.

Conclusion: For patients with pneumoconiosis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the PCV-VG mode can reduce intraoperative airway pressures and early postoperative LUS values, decrease ventilation loss, and improve perioperative oxygenation.

目的:探讨压力控制容积保证通气(PCV-VG)模式对尘肺患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术后肺功能的影响。方法:选取40例全麻下择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术尘肺患者,采用随机数字表法随机分为PCV-VG模式组和VCV模式组。主要观察指标为入手术室后(T0)、手术结束时(T3)、拔管后30分钟(T4)、术后2小时(T5)肺超声评分(LUS)。记录人工气腹开始前2分钟(T1)和开始后20分钟(T2)气道峰值压力(Ppeak)和平台压力(Pplat)。在T0、T2和T4进行动脉血气分析,计算氧合指数(OI)。结果:与VCV组(n = 20)相比,PCV-VG组(n = 20)在T3、T4、T5时的中位LUS均有显著改善(均P P P P)。结论:对于腹腔镜胆囊切除术尘肺患者,PCV-VG模式可降低术中气道压力和术后早期LUS值,减少通气损失,改善围手术期氧合。
{"title":"Impact of Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation on Pulmonary Function in Coal Workers with Pneumoconiosis Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Junfeng Zhang, Bin Li, Jiangbo Qu, Yanan Li, Jiahui Liu, Huibin Mao","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00032","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of the pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) mode on pulmonary function in patients with pneumoconiosis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with pneumoconiosis scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method: the PCV-VG mode group and the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode group. The primary outcome was lung ultrasound score (LUS) after entering the operating room (T0), at the end of surgery (T3), 30 minutes after tracheal extubation (T4), and 2 hours postoperatively (T5). Peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and plateau pressure (Pplat) were recorded 2 minutes before (T1) and 20 minutes after the initiation of artificial pneumoperitoneum (T2). Arterial blood gas analyses were performed at T0, T2, and T4 to calculate the oxygenation index (OI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the VCV group (n = 20), the PCV-VG group (n = 20) exhibited significantly improvement of median LUS at T3, T4, and T5 (all <i>P</i> < .05). Significantly lower Ppeak and Pplat were found in PCV-VG group at T1 (16.2 ± 1.81 and 14.6 ± 1.85) and T2 (24.3 ± 2.75 and 19.7 ± 3.08) (<i>P</i> < .05). Additionally, median OI significantly improved at T2 and T4 in PCV-VG group (<i>P</i> < .05). No early postoperative pulmonary complications were found in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with pneumoconiosis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the PCV-VG mode can reduce intraoperative airway pressures and early postoperative LUS values, decrease ventilation loss, and improve perioperative oxygenation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Specialty-Level Overview of Emerging AI Trends. 医学中的人工智能:新兴人工智能趋势的专业级概述。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00041
Jesse L Popover, Spencer P Wallace, Jeremie Feldman, George Chastain, Chris Kalathia, Adnan Imam, Majd Almasri, Paul G Toomey

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a turning point in medical advancement. Despite the burgeoning research in this field, there exists a general lack of overview of where AI is being most utilized. This study reviews and describes techniques and trends of AI in the major medical specialties.

Method: A literature search was conducted through PubMed in 2024 using two different search methods. Twenty-nine medical specialties were included, including all 24 major medical board specialties and five additional subspecialties.

Results: There were 143,578 publications involving AI identified with most these (87%) published in the last ten years (124,206) and 52% (74,239) in the last two years. Radiology and Pathology publications were the largest cohorts, 18% (25,319) and 17% (23,828), respectively. Plastic Surgery (1,053), Hepatobiliary (662), and Allergy/Immunology (449) were the least published. There has been a 10,859% growth rate in annual publications across all medical specialties, with Ophthalmology and Preventative Medicine being the fastest-growing areas of research despite Radiology and Pathology being the most researched to date.

Conclusion: This review underscores AI's profound impact on medical research, highlighting its significant growth and utilization across various specialties. AI's influence is most pronounced in Radiology and Pathology, but the substantial increase in publications in Ophthalmology and Preventative Medicine suggests new emerging areas of focus. The ongoing expansion of AI in medicine presents a promising horizon for addressing complex healthcare challenges, fostering a deeper and more comprehensive integration across all specialties.

目的:人工智能(AI)是医学进步的转折点。尽管这一领域的研究正在蓬勃发展,但人们普遍缺乏对人工智能在哪些领域得到了最大利用的概述。本研究回顾并描述了人工智能在主要医学专业中的技术和趋势。方法:采用两种不同的检索方法在2024年PubMed进行文献检索。包括29个医学专科,包括医疗委员会所有24个主要专科和另外5个专科。结果:共收录人工智能相关文献143578篇,其中近10年发表的文献最多(87%)(124206篇),近2年发表的文献占52%(74239篇)。放射学和病理学出版物是最大的队列,分别为18%(25,319)和17%(23,828)。整形外科(1053)、肝胆(662)和过敏/免疫学(449)发表的论文最少。所有医学专业的年度出版物增长率为10,859%,其中眼科和预防医学是增长最快的研究领域,尽管放射学和病理学是迄今为止研究最多的领域。结论:本综述强调了人工智能对医学研究的深远影响,突出了其在各个专业的显著增长和应用。人工智能的影响在放射学和病理学中最为明显,但眼科和预防医学出版物的大幅增加表明了新的重点领域。人工智能在医学领域的持续扩展为解决复杂的医疗保健挑战提供了一个有希望的前景,促进了所有专业之间更深入、更全面的整合。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Specialty-Level Overview of Emerging AI Trends.","authors":"Jesse L Popover, Spencer P Wallace, Jeremie Feldman, George Chastain, Chris Kalathia, Adnan Imam, Majd Almasri, Paul G Toomey","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00041","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is a turning point in medical advancement. Despite the burgeoning research in this field, there exists a general lack of overview of where AI is being most utilized. This study reviews and describes techniques and trends of AI in the major medical specialties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature search was conducted through PubMed in 2024 using two different search methods. Twenty-nine medical specialties were included, including all 24 major medical board specialties and five additional subspecialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 143,578 publications involving AI identified with most these (87%) published in the last ten years (124,206) and 52% (74,239) in the last two years. Radiology and Pathology publications were the largest cohorts, 18% (25,319) and 17% (23,828), respectively. Plastic Surgery (1,053), Hepatobiliary (662), and Allergy/Immunology (449) were the least published. There has been a 10,859% growth rate in annual publications across all medical specialties, with Ophthalmology and Preventative Medicine being the fastest-growing areas of research despite Radiology and Pathology being the most researched to date.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores AI's profound impact on medical research, highlighting its significant growth and utilization across various specialties. AI's influence is most pronounced in Radiology and Pathology, but the substantial increase in publications in Ophthalmology and Preventative Medicine suggests new emerging areas of focus. The ongoing expansion of AI in medicine presents a promising horizon for addressing complex healthcare challenges, fostering a deeper and more comprehensive integration across all specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409705/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145015734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-Port and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children with Acute Appendicitis. 儿童急性阑尾炎单孔与常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00061
Menglei Wang, Jianyu Wang, Bingshan Xia, Hai Zhou, Chunbao Guo

Objective: The aim is to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric cases, providing a rigorous assessment of their respective therapeutic impacts.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on pediatric appendicitis cases operated on by a single primary surgeon using either single-port or conventional laparoscopic techniques between July 2015 and June 2024. The study encompassed variables such as age, onset timing, operative duration, hospital stay, and pathological classification, to compare the therapeutic outcomes of both surgical approaches.

Results: The retrospective review included 1,435 pediatric cases of acute appendicitis, with 1,239 in the conventional laparoscopic group and 196 in the single-port laparoscopic group. The conventional laparoscopic procedure utilized a 3-port technique, whereas the single-port laparoscopic group employed a silicone 3-port Trocar. Statistical analysis of age, onset timing, operative duration, and hospital stay revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Pathological examination of appendicitis types, as determined by the χ2 test, indicated no significant disparities in distribution across the groups.

Conclusion: Given that pediatric surgeons possess adept laparoscopic surgical skills, single-port laparoscopic surgery is a viable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of acute appendicitis in children, offering comparable therapeutic benefits.

目的:目的是评估和对比单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术在儿科病例中的有效性,为各自的治疗效果提供严格的评估。方法:回顾性分析2015年7月至2024年6月间由一名主刀医师使用单孔或常规腹腔镜手术治疗的儿童阑尾炎病例。该研究包括年龄、发病时间、手术时间、住院时间和病理分类等变量,以比较两种手术入路的治疗结果。结果:回顾性分析1435例小儿急性阑尾炎,其中常规腹腔镜组1239例,单孔腹腔镜组196例。传统腹腔镜手术采用三孔技术,而单孔腹腔镜组采用硅胶三孔套管针。两组患者年龄、发病时间、手术时间、住院时间统计差异无统计学意义。病理检查阑尾炎类型,经χ2检验,各组间分布无显著差异。结论:鉴于儿科外科医生具有熟练的腹腔镜手术技能,单孔腹腔镜手术是传统腹腔镜手术治疗儿童急性阑尾炎的可行替代方案,具有相当的治疗效果。
{"title":"Single-Port and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children with Acute Appendicitis.","authors":"Menglei Wang, Jianyu Wang, Bingshan Xia, Hai Zhou, Chunbao Guo","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00061","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric cases, providing a rigorous assessment of their respective therapeutic impacts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed on pediatric appendicitis cases operated on by a single primary surgeon using either single-port or conventional laparoscopic techniques between July 2015 and June 2024. The study encompassed variables such as age, onset timing, operative duration, hospital stay, and pathological classification, to compare the therapeutic outcomes of both surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The retrospective review included 1,435 pediatric cases of acute appendicitis, with 1,239 in the conventional laparoscopic group and 196 in the single-port laparoscopic group. The conventional laparoscopic procedure utilized a 3-port technique, whereas the single-port laparoscopic group employed a silicone 3-port Trocar. Statistical analysis of age, onset timing, operative duration, and hospital stay revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Pathological examination of appendicitis types, as determined by the χ<sup>2</sup> test, indicated no significant disparities in distribution across the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given that pediatric surgeons possess adept laparoscopic surgical skills, single-port laparoscopic surgery is a viable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of acute appendicitis in children, offering comparable therapeutic benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479055/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145200051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy for Complicated Colorectal Disease in Emergency Settings. 急诊复杂结直肠疾病的手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00039
Donghyoun Lee, Yoon Hyung Kang, Yongbog Kim, Sung Ryol Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Kyung Uk Jung

Background and objectives: The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic approaches for emergency colorectal surgery are not yet fully established, though their use is increasing with studies reporting laparoscopic colectomy is safe and feasible for appropriately selected patients. Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) involves inserting one hand into the abdomen through a small incision, offering advantages that may facilitate laparoscopic procedures in emergencies. This study reports our experience with emergency HAL colectomy.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive colorectal emergency cases treated with HAL colectomy in a tertiary referral center. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Survival rates were calculated for cases with malignancy.

Results: From February 2015 to July 2019, HAL was applied to all emergency colectomy cases in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I-III. A total of 50 patients treated with HAL colectomy for complicated colorectal disease were reviewed. Twenty-five patients (50%) had an obstruction which required an intraoperative decompression procedure or intraoperative antegrade colonic irrigation. Thirty-eight patients (76%) had perforation. There were 2 cases of open conversion (4%). The median duration of the operation was 160 minutes. The median amount of estimated blood loss was 250 mL. The median time of postoperative stay was 12 days. The postoperative complication rate associated with the operation was 26% (13/50). There were 2 postoperative mortalities.

Conclusion: HAL appears to be a feasible option in emergency colectomy for ASA I-III patients and may be beneficial in specific surgical practice contexts.

背景和目的:腹腔镜入路用于紧急结直肠手术的安全性和有效性尚未完全确定,尽管随着研究报道腹腔镜结肠切除术对适当选择的患者是安全可行的,腹腔镜入路的使用正在增加。手辅助腹腔镜(HAL)包括将一只手通过一个小切口插入腹部,提供了在紧急情况下方便腹腔镜手术的优势。本研究报告急诊HAL结肠切除术的经验。方法:回顾性分析在三级转诊中心接受HAL结肠切除术治疗的连续结直肠急诊病例。分析患者人口统计学、手术指征、手术细节和术后结果。计算恶性肿瘤患者的生存率。结果:2015年2月至2019年7月,HAL应用于所有美国麻醉学会(ASA)评分为I-III的患者的急诊结肠切除术病例。本文回顾了50例采用HAL结肠切除术治疗复杂结直肠疾病的病例。25例(50%)患者有梗阻,需要术中减压或术中顺行结肠冲洗。38例(76%)出现穿孔。开放转换2例(4%)。手术时间中位数为160分钟。估计中位失血量为250 mL。术后中位住院时间为12天。术后并发症发生率为26%(13/50)。术后死亡2例。结论:HAL似乎是ASA I-III患者紧急结肠切除术的可行选择,并且可能在特定的手术实践环境中有益。
{"title":"Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy for Complicated Colorectal Disease in Emergency Settings.","authors":"Donghyoun Lee, Yoon Hyung Kang, Yongbog Kim, Sung Ryol Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Kyung Uk Jung","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00039","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic approaches for emergency colorectal surgery are not yet fully established, though their use is increasing with studies reporting laparoscopic colectomy is safe and feasible for appropriately selected patients. Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) involves inserting one hand into the abdomen through a small incision, offering advantages that may facilitate laparoscopic procedures in emergencies. This study reports our experience with emergency HAL colectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of consecutive colorectal emergency cases treated with HAL colectomy in a tertiary referral center. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Survival rates were calculated for cases with malignancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2015 to July 2019, HAL was applied to all emergency colectomy cases in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I-III. A total of 50 patients treated with HAL colectomy for complicated colorectal disease were reviewed. Twenty-five patients (50%) had an obstruction which required an intraoperative decompression procedure or intraoperative antegrade colonic irrigation. Thirty-eight patients (76%) had perforation. There were 2 cases of open conversion (4%). The median duration of the operation was 160 minutes. The median amount of estimated blood loss was 250 mL. The median time of postoperative stay was 12 days. The postoperative complication rate associated with the operation was 26% (13/50). There were 2 postoperative mortalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HAL appears to be a feasible option in emergency colectomy for ASA I-III patients and may be beneficial in specific surgical practice contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409702/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145015742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Management of Grade C Anastomotic Leak following Left-Sided Colorectal Resection. 左侧结直肠切除术后C级吻合口漏的腹腔镜治疗。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00053
Chinasa P Okonkwo, Martin Infante Altamirano, Amunu Adogowa, Henry J Lujan

Background: Management of left-sided colorectal Grade C anastomotic leak (AL) has traditionally been managed via laparotomy. However, with the growing adoption of minimally invasive techniques, recent literature suggests that laparoscopic surgery provides a safe and viable alternative for managing Grade C leaks.

Methods: This study is a case series that consists of 7 adults that underwent laparoscopic reintervention of purulent or feculent peritonitis from left-sided colorectal AL during the period of 2016-2024 at our institution. Outcomes measured included days to presentation, operative times, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and rates of stoma closure.

Results: Of the 7 patients, 6 of them had purulent peritonitis and one had feculent peritonitis. The average time from index operation to clinically evident AL was 6 days. The patients were managed with laparoscopic with drainage, colorrhapy and Hartmann's procedure.Complications include subhepatic fluid collection, hematoma, infected seroma. The average operative time was 145.3 min. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) after reoperation was 11 days. All patients had their stoma reversed within an average of 90 days. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion: MIS approach to Grade C AL in left-sided colorectal resection is safe and feasible. It can be performed with low morbidity and mortality and high rates of stoma closure.

背景:左侧结直肠C级吻合口漏(AL)的治疗传统上是通过剖腹手术进行的。然而,随着微创技术的日益普及,最近的文献表明,腹腔镜手术为治疗C级泄漏提供了一种安全可行的选择。方法:本研究是一个病例系列,包括7名成人,于2016-2024年在我院接受腹腔镜再干预治疗左侧结直肠AL的化脓性或脓性腹膜炎。测量的结果包括到就诊的天数、手术时间、住院时间、发病率、死亡率和造口率。结果:7例患者中,化脓性腹膜炎6例,便血性腹膜炎1例。从指数手术到临床明显AL的平均时间为6天。患者采用腹腔镜下引流、染色和哈特曼手术。并发症包括肝下积液、血肿、感染血肿。平均手术时间145.3 min。再手术后平均住院时间(LOS)为11天。所有患者在平均90天内完成了造口手术。没有人员死亡。结论:MIS入路在左侧结肠C级AL切除术中是安全可行的。它可以进行低发病率和死亡率和高的气孔关闭率。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Management of Grade C Anastomotic Leak following Left-Sided Colorectal Resection.","authors":"Chinasa P Okonkwo, Martin Infante Altamirano, Amunu Adogowa, Henry J Lujan","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00053","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of left-sided colorectal Grade C anastomotic leak (AL) has traditionally been managed via laparotomy. However, with the growing adoption of minimally invasive techniques, recent literature suggests that laparoscopic surgery provides a safe and viable alternative for managing Grade C leaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a case series that consists of 7 adults that underwent laparoscopic reintervention of purulent or feculent peritonitis from left-sided colorectal AL during the period of 2016-2024 at our institution. Outcomes measured included days to presentation, operative times, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and rates of stoma closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7 patients, 6 of them had purulent peritonitis and one had feculent peritonitis. The average time from index operation to clinically evident AL was 6 days. The patients were managed with laparoscopic with drainage, colorrhapy and Hartmann's procedure.Complications include subhepatic fluid collection, hematoma, infected seroma. The average operative time was 145.3 min. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) after reoperation was 11 days. All patients had their stoma reversed within an average of 90 days. No deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIS approach to Grade C AL in left-sided colorectal resection is safe and feasible. It can be performed with low morbidity and mortality and high rates of stoma closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409706/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145015798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1