Described is a simple modification of the O'Reilly esophageal retractor to aid in performing laparoscopic posterior gastric wraps during antireflux procedures. A 3-mm hole was drilled into the distal end of the reticulating arm. Once the arm is positioned posteriorly to the gastroesophageal (GE) junction, the freed gastric fundus can be secured to the retractor with a suture. The fundus can then be pulled posteriorly to the GE junction and held into position for placement of the fundoplication sutures.
{"title":"Simple Instrument Modification to Aid in Laparoscopic Gastric Wraps for Posterior Fundoplications.","authors":"Mark W Jones","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Described is a simple modification of the O'Reilly esophageal retractor to aid in performing laparoscopic posterior gastric wraps during antireflux procedures. A 3-mm hole was drilled into the distal end of the reticulating arm. Once the arm is positioned posteriorly to the gastroesophageal (GE) junction, the freed gastric fundus can be secured to the retractor with a suture. The fundus can then be pulled posteriorly to the GE junction and held into position for placement of the fundoplication sutures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/a0/e2022.00090.PMC10065755.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9242289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abdullah Aldohayan, Sulaiman Alshammari, Ahmed Binjaloud, Hamad Alsubaie, Najla Aldohayan, Saad Alobaili, Talal Alfaadhel, Saud Alghamdi, Ahmed Thallaj, Ahmed Alhumud
Background and objectives: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an accepted renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Managing inguinal hernia in patients with PD is not standardized. Thus, this study reported the outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia.
Methods: Thirteen patients with chronic renal disease and inguinal hernia attending a tertiary hospital between May 1, 2016 and June 30, 2021 were evaluated for laparoscopic PDC placement. Concurrent laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic PDC placement were performed. Dialysate fluid was measured intraoperatively to the level below the incised peritoneum by 1 inch. The inflow and outflow was smooth without leakage. The amount was increased gradually in the two weeks after regular PD was obtained.
Results: Laparoscopic PDC was inserted for 13 patients. Ten patients had unilateral hernia and two had bilateral inguinal hernia. Associated paraumbilical hernia was discovered in two patients. The median follow-up was 30 months. The measured safe amount of dialysate fluid intraoperatively was 400 - 600 mL. There was no death, intraoperative complication, or dialysate leakage. Three PDCs were removed owing to noncompliance. No hernia recurrence was observed.
Conclusion: Simultaneous laparoscopic PDC placement and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia with immediate dialysis is a safe and feasible surgical technique. Utilizing minimally invasive surgery affords PDC placement and inguinal hernia repair simultaneously.
{"title":"Immediate Dialysis After Simultaneous Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.","authors":"Abdullah Aldohayan, Sulaiman Alshammari, Ahmed Binjaloud, Hamad Alsubaie, Najla Aldohayan, Saad Alobaili, Talal Alfaadhel, Saud Alghamdi, Ahmed Thallaj, Ahmed Alhumud","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an accepted renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Managing inguinal hernia in patients with PD is not standardized. Thus, this study reported the outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen patients with chronic renal disease and inguinal hernia attending a tertiary hospital between May 1, 2016 and June 30, 2021 were evaluated for laparoscopic PDC placement. Concurrent laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic PDC placement were performed. Dialysate fluid was measured intraoperatively to the level below the incised peritoneum by 1 inch. The inflow and outflow was smooth without leakage. The amount was increased gradually in the two weeks after regular PD was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laparoscopic PDC was inserted for 13 patients. Ten patients had unilateral hernia and two had bilateral inguinal hernia. Associated paraumbilical hernia was discovered in two patients. The median follow-up was 30 months. The measured safe amount of dialysate fluid intraoperatively was 400 - 600 mL. There was no death, intraoperative complication, or dialysate leakage. Three PDCs were removed owing to noncompliance. No hernia recurrence was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simultaneous laparoscopic PDC placement and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia with immediate dialysis is a safe and feasible surgical technique. Utilizing minimally invasive surgery affords PDC placement and inguinal hernia repair simultaneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/18/e2022.00087.PMC10009876.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9287260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (GRP-LS) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method for gynecological diseases.
Methods: This study included gasless laparoscopic surgeries performed at our hospital between September 1, 1993 and December 31, 2016. The new GRP-LS technique was compared with the conventional gasless three-port laparoscopic surgery (G3P-LS), based on patient background, operative results in patients treated for laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (LC), and laparoscopic salpingectomy (LT). Surgeons of the two techniques were categorized by the number of surgeries they had performed, and the number of surgeons and surgeries for each technique were compared.
Results: GRP-LS was used in 2,338 cases and G3P-LS in 2,473 cases. GRP-LS was used in 980 LM cases, 804 LC cases, 240 LT cases, and 314 cases for other conditions. The operative time required for GRP-LS was significantly less for LM, LC, LT, and the procedure also had less blood loss for LM and LC than G3P-LS. G3P-LS required a transition to open surgery in 0.69% of cases, whereas GRP-LS showed a very low rate of 0.09%. Sixty-seven of the 78 GRP-LS surgeons (85.9%) had performed fewer than 50 GRP-LSs, and these surgeons performed about half of all surgeries. Eighty-three of the 93 GRP-LS surgeons (89.2%) had performed fewer than 50 G3P-LSs, and these surgeons performed 38.9% of all surgeries.
Conclusions: GRP-LS is an effective surgery with few complications and less cosmetic damage and can be easily introduced to novice or inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons.
{"title":"Development and Efficacy of Gasless Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecological Diseases.","authors":"Hiroe Ito, Yasufumi Oishi, Yotaro Takaesu, Keiichi Isaka","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (GRP-LS) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method for gynecological diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included gasless laparoscopic surgeries performed at our hospital between September 1, 1993 and December 31, 2016. The new GRP-LS technique was compared with the conventional gasless three-port laparoscopic surgery (G3P-LS), based on patient background, operative results in patients treated for laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (LC), and laparoscopic salpingectomy (LT). Surgeons of the two techniques were categorized by the number of surgeries they had performed, and the number of surgeons and surgeries for each technique were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GRP-LS was used in 2,338 cases and G3P-LS in 2,473 cases. GRP-LS was used in 980 LM cases, 804 LC cases, 240 LT cases, and 314 cases for other conditions. The operative time required for GRP-LS was significantly less for LM, LC, LT, and the procedure also had less blood loss for LM and LC than G3P-LS. G3P-LS required a transition to open surgery in 0.69% of cases, whereas GRP-LS showed a very low rate of 0.09%. Sixty-seven of the 78 GRP-LS surgeons (85.9%) had performed fewer than 50 GRP-LSs, and these surgeons performed about half of all surgeries. Eighty-three of the 93 GRP-LS surgeons (89.2%) had performed fewer than 50 G3P-LSs, and these surgeons performed 38.9% of all surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GRP-LS is an effective surgery with few complications and less cosmetic damage and can be easily introduced to novice or inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/a5/e2022.00083.PMC10065756.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9235981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Omar Yusef Kudsi, Georges Kaoukabani, Naseem Bou-Ayash, Fahri Gokcal
Background and objectives: To estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and to assess the clinical outcomes in two different types of mesh in robotic Rives-Stoppa (rRS) ventral hernia repair (VHR).
Methods: A retrospective analysis of a robotic VHR database between February 1, 2013 and May 31, 2022. Patients who underwent a rRS VHR were included in this study and separated into two groups depending on the mesh used: SynecorTM Preperitoneal Biomaterial (SynecorTM Pre) and Bard™ Soft. Through propensity score and inverse-probability-treatment-weighting, the ATT was estimated for two scenarios; the first with the treated target having used the SynecorTM Pre, the second having used the Bard™ Soft mesh. Adjusted linear regression models, including lingering imbalanced variables, were used for both the primary outcome of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), and the secondary outcome of the hospital cost.
Results: A total of 186 patients who underwent rRS were separated into the two groups (SynecorTM Pre mesh, n = 85; Bard™ Soft mesh, n = 101). Adjusted linear regression models for the CCI showed no statistical difference between both groups (p > 0.05), whereas ATT on hospital cost was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the SynecorTM Pre group in both scenarios [(95% confidence interval) = 3882 (2352, 5413) and -5185 (-8213, -2157), respectively].
Conclusion: Both mesh materials provided excellent outcomes with no difference in complications or recurrence rates. However, hospital cost was found to be higher in the hybrid mesh group. Long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the performance of both mesh types in rRS.
背景与目的:评估两种不同类型补片在机器人Rives-Stoppa (rRS)腹疝修补术(VHR)中的平均治疗效果和临床效果。方法:对2013年2月1日至2022年5月31日机器人VHR数据库进行回顾性分析。接受rRS VHR的患者被纳入本研究,并根据使用的补片分为两组:SynecorTM Pre -腹膜生物材料(SynecorTM Pre)和Bard™Soft。通过倾向得分和逆概率处理加权,估计了两种情况下的ATT;第一次使用的是SynecorTM Pre,第二次使用的是Bard™Soft mesh。综合并发症指数(CCI®)的主要结局和医院费用的次要结局均采用调整后的线性回归模型,包括持续的不平衡变量。结果:186例rRS患者分为两组(SynecorTM Pre mesh, n = 85;巴德™软网,n = 101)。调整后的线性回归模型显示两组CCI无统计学差异(p > 0.05),而两种情况下SynecorTM Pre组的住院费用ATT均显著高于两组(p < 0.001)[(95%置信区间)分别= 3882(2352,5413)和-5185(-8213,-2157)]。结论:两种补片材料效果良好,无并发症和复发率差异。然而,混合补片组的住院费用较高。需要长期随访,以充分评估两种补片在rRS中的性能。
{"title":"Comparison of Hybrid Versus Synthetic Mesh in Robotic Rives-Stoppa Ventral Hernia Repair.","authors":"Omar Yusef Kudsi, Georges Kaoukabani, Naseem Bou-Ayash, Fahri Gokcal","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and to assess the clinical outcomes in two different types of mesh in robotic Rives-Stoppa (rRS) ventral hernia repair (VHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of a robotic VHR database between February 1, 2013 and May 31, 2022. Patients who underwent a rRS VHR were included in this study and separated into two groups depending on the mesh used: Synecor<sup>TM</sup> Preperitoneal Biomaterial (Synecor<sup>TM</sup> Pre) and Bard™ Soft. Through propensity score and inverse-probability-treatment-weighting, the ATT was estimated for two scenarios; the first with the treated target having used the Synecor<sup>TM</sup> Pre, the second having used the Bard™ Soft mesh. Adjusted linear regression models, including lingering imbalanced variables, were used for both the primary outcome of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), and the secondary outcome of the hospital cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 186 patients who underwent rRS were separated into the two groups (Synecor<sup>TM</sup> Pre mesh, n = 85; Bard™ Soft mesh, n = 101). Adjusted linear regression models for the CCI showed no statistical difference between both groups (p > 0.05), whereas ATT on hospital cost was significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the Synecor<sup>TM</sup> Pre group in both scenarios [(95% confidence interval) = 3882 (2352, 5413) and -5185 (-8213, -2157), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both mesh materials provided excellent outcomes with no difference in complications or recurrence rates. However, hospital cost was found to be higher in the hybrid mesh group. Long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the performance of both mesh types in rRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/cc/e2022.00071.PMC9840217.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Megan Birkhold, Ali Khalifeh, Khanjan Nagarsheth, Stephen M Kavic
Objective: Median arcuate ligament (MAL) syndrome is a constellation of symptoms related to compression of the celiac artery trunk. Minimally invasive release of the ligament has been shown to improve these symptoms. This study describes one institution's experience with this procedure and reports on outcomes of minimally invasive release and patient quality of life.
Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent minimally invasive release of the MAL at our institution. Patients were mailed a survey consisting of the 36-Item Short Form and Visick questionnaires. If surveys were not returned after one month, patients were called and asked to complete them over the phone. Demographic and pre- and postoperative data were collected and analyzed.
Results: Eleven patients underwent a laparoscopic MAL release from January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2020. Most patients, 73%, reported epigastric pain as their primary symptom for a median of 18 months. All cases were successfully completed laparoscopically, with only one intraoperative complication. Mean hospital length of stay was 1.4 d. At the time of survey completion, the mean weight change was 2.3 kg. Additional interventions for resolution of symptoms and celiac artery stenosis were required for two patients. Surveys were completed by eight patients. A mean Visick score of 1.8 showed resolution or improved symptoms for all patients. SF-36 scores were highest for physical functioning, emotional well-being, and social functioning health areas.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive release of the MAL is a safe and effective surgery for patients suffering from MALS. Symptoms improved after adequate release of the ligament, with minimal morbidity and additional postoperative procedures needed.
{"title":"Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome is Effectively Relieved with Minimally Invasive Surgery.","authors":"Megan Birkhold, Ali Khalifeh, Khanjan Nagarsheth, Stephen M Kavic","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Median arcuate ligament (MAL) syndrome is a constellation of symptoms related to compression of the celiac artery trunk. Minimally invasive release of the ligament has been shown to improve these symptoms. This study describes one institution's experience with this procedure and reports on outcomes of minimally invasive release and patient quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent minimally invasive release of the MAL at our institution. Patients were mailed a survey consisting of the 36-Item Short Form and Visick questionnaires. If surveys were not returned after one month, patients were called and asked to complete them over the phone. Demographic and pre- and postoperative data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients underwent a laparoscopic MAL release from January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2020. Most patients, 73%, reported epigastric pain as their primary symptom for a median of 18 months. All cases were successfully completed laparoscopically, with only one intraoperative complication. Mean hospital length of stay was 1.4 d. At the time of survey completion, the mean weight change was 2.3 kg. Additional interventions for resolution of symptoms and celiac artery stenosis were required for two patients. Surveys were completed by eight patients. A mean Visick score of 1.8 showed resolution or improved symptoms for all patients. SF-36 scores were highest for physical functioning, emotional well-being, and social functioning health areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive release of the MAL is a safe and effective surgery for patients suffering from MALS. Symptoms improved after adequate release of the ligament, with minimal morbidity and additional postoperative procedures needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/aa/e2022.00067.PMC9840215.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Moona Arabkhazaeli, Genevieve Umeh, Vruti Virani, Kari Plewniak
Background and objective: To analyze long-term effectiveness of a conservative, uterine-sparing approach to laparoscopic Essure removal. Specific outcomes of interest include patient satisfaction, symptom resolution, and subsequent surgical intervention.
Methods: A retrospective case series and follow-up survey. Patients who underwent laparoscopic Essure removal without concomitant hysterectomy between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 were identified. Greater than 18 months after removal participants completed a survey assessing outcomes.
Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent conservative Essure removal and there were 19 survey respondents. Among survey respondents, the mean length of time from Essure placement to removal was 56.7 months (range 5 - 117), and the mean length of time from removal to survey administration was 48.3 months (range 23 - 63). The most frequently reported symptoms were pain (100%), bleeding (52.6%), headache (42.1%), and dyspareunia (42.1%). Methods for removal included laparoscopic salpingectomy (58.6%), a combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach (34.4%), and cornuectomy (6.9%). Regarding symptom improvement after Essure removal, 47.4% of patients reported total improvement, 36.8% reported almost total improvement, 5.3% reported some improvement, and 10.5% reported no improvement. Most patients (89.5%) reported satisfaction with their surgical results, and only two patients required subsequent surgical intervention for symptom management.
Conclusions: Most patients in our cohort reported total or almost total improvement in symptoms almost two years after Essure removal, with low rates of reintervention. A uterine-sparing approach to Essure removal, using laparoscopic and hysteroscopic modalities, may be a feasible and effective approach to addressing Essure-attributed symptoms.
{"title":"Outcomes after a Uterine-Sparing Approach to Essure Contraceptive Device Removal.","authors":"Moona Arabkhazaeli, Genevieve Umeh, Vruti Virani, Kari Plewniak","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To analyze long-term effectiveness of a conservative, uterine-sparing approach to laparoscopic Essure removal. Specific outcomes of interest include patient satisfaction, symptom resolution, and subsequent surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series and follow-up survey. Patients who underwent laparoscopic Essure removal without concomitant hysterectomy between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 were identified. Greater than 18 months after removal participants completed a survey assessing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients underwent conservative Essure removal and there were 19 survey respondents. Among survey respondents, the mean length of time from Essure placement to removal was 56.7 months (range 5 - 117), and the mean length of time from removal to survey administration was 48.3 months (range 23 - 63). The most frequently reported symptoms were pain (100%), bleeding (52.6%), headache (42.1%), and dyspareunia (42.1%). Methods for removal included laparoscopic salpingectomy (58.6%), a combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach (34.4%), and cornuectomy (6.9%). Regarding symptom improvement after Essure removal, 47.4% of patients reported total improvement, 36.8% reported almost total improvement, 5.3% reported some improvement, and 10.5% reported no improvement. Most patients (89.5%) reported satisfaction with their surgical results, and only two patients required subsequent surgical intervention for symptom management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients in our cohort reported total or almost total improvement in symptoms almost two years after Essure removal, with low rates of reintervention. A uterine-sparing approach to Essure removal, using laparoscopic and hysteroscopic modalities, may be a feasible and effective approach to addressing Essure-attributed symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726173/pdf/e2022.00072.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10460750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Martin Keltz, Emma C Brown, Gary N Frishman, May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler
Objective(s): To evaluate the cannulation success rate, cumulative pregnancy, and time to intrauterine pregnancy rate following fluoroscopically-guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation (FHTC) for infertile subjects with proximal tubal obstruction. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated subjects with unilateral or bilateral proximal tubal obstruction on hysterosalpingography, who failed concomitant selective salpingography and subsequently underwent FHTC at the time of a hysteroscopy performed for findings seen on sonohysterography. FHTC employed a Novy Catheter (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT.) with or without the 3 French inner catheter and guidewire, to cannulate the occluded fallopian tube(s), followed by the injection of HypaqueTM (Amersham Health, Inc, Princeton, NJ.) contrast under C-arm imaging. Technical success rates, complications, post-procedure pregnancies, and average time from surgery to pregnancy were evaluated. Results: Thirty-two women between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 met the entry criteria and underwent FHTC. Of those women with bilateral obstruction, 6/6 (100%) of subjects achieved at least unilateral patency, while patency was achieved in 23/26 (88.5%) subjects with unilateral obstruction. Twenty-nine of 32 (90.6%) subjects had at least one tube successfully cannulated with 34/38 (89.5%) of proximally obstructed tubes opened. Asymptomatic tubal perforation occurred in 1/38 tubes (2.6%). Ten subjects (34.5%) achieved intrauterine pregnancies without in vitro fertilization in an average of 64.9 days from the procedure. There were no multiple pregnancies and one ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion(s): FHTC is a safe, effective, incision free procedure that results in 90% of tubes successfully cannulated, and an observed short time to intrauterine pregnancy.
{"title":"Fluoroscopically-Guided Hysteroscopic Tubal Cannulation: A Procedure for Proximal Tubal Obstruction.","authors":"Martin Keltz, Emma C Brown, Gary N Frishman, May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00047","url":null,"abstract":"Objective(s): To evaluate the cannulation success rate, cumulative pregnancy, and time to intrauterine pregnancy rate following fluoroscopically-guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation (FHTC) for infertile subjects with proximal tubal obstruction. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated subjects with unilateral or bilateral proximal tubal obstruction on hysterosalpingography, who failed concomitant selective salpingography and subsequently underwent FHTC at the time of a hysteroscopy performed for findings seen on sonohysterography. FHTC employed a Novy Catheter (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT.) with or without the 3 French inner catheter and guidewire, to cannulate the occluded fallopian tube(s), followed by the injection of HypaqueTM (Amersham Health, Inc, Princeton, NJ.) contrast under C-arm imaging. Technical success rates, complications, post-procedure pregnancies, and average time from surgery to pregnancy were evaluated. Results: Thirty-two women between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 met the entry criteria and underwent FHTC. Of those women with bilateral obstruction, 6/6 (100%) of subjects achieved at least unilateral patency, while patency was achieved in 23/26 (88.5%) subjects with unilateral obstruction. Twenty-nine of 32 (90.6%) subjects had at least one tube successfully cannulated with 34/38 (89.5%) of proximally obstructed tubes opened. Asymptomatic tubal perforation occurred in 1/38 tubes (2.6%). Ten subjects (34.5%) achieved intrauterine pregnancies without in vitro fertilization in an average of 64.9 days from the procedure. There were no multiple pregnancies and one ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion(s): FHTC is a safe, effective, incision free procedure that results in 90% of tubes successfully cannulated, and an observed short time to intrauterine pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/7d/e2022.00047.PMC9726172.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10530072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair can be performed with an antireflux procedure. Routine use of an esophageal bougie has been advocated to avoid an excessively tight fundoplication. The use of an esophageal bougie carries a risk of iatrogenic complications, such as perforation or laceration of the viscera. However, there is equivocal evidence for the routine use in the surgical literature.
Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of patients with Types 3 and 4 paraesophageal hiatal hernias who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication without the use of an esophageal bougie, between December 1, 2010 and February 28, 2020, by a single surgeon at a community-based, academic hospital. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia and gastroesophageal dysmotility were excluded. Perioperative outcome measures included: recurrence; prolonged postoperative proton pump inhibitor use; dysphagia; re-operation, and mortality.
Results: A total of 174 patients (34 males, 140 females) underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication. The average age was 63-years old. Four patients (2.3%) developed dysphagia with narrowing of the gastroesophageal junction, with one patient (0.6%) requiring postoperative esophageal dilation with bougie and eventual re-operation. Postoperative proton pump inhibitor use was 31.0% after 1 month. Overall hernia recurrence rate was 14.9% and the rate of re-operation was 6.3%. Overall mortality was 0.6%.
Conclusion: We conclude that laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication without an esophageal bougie is safe, effective, and efficient. Furthermore, bougie related risks are obviated with a comparable reported incidence of postoperative dysphagia and hiatal hernia recurrence.
{"title":"Routine Intraoperative Use of Esophageal Bougie in Minimally Invasive Hiatal Hernia Repair is Not Necessary.","authors":"David Seok, Manu Kaushik, Michael Jacobs","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair can be performed with an antireflux procedure. Routine use of an esophageal bougie has been advocated to avoid an excessively tight fundoplication. The use of an esophageal bougie carries a risk of iatrogenic complications, such as perforation or laceration of the viscera. However, there is equivocal evidence for the routine use in the surgical literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a retrospective analysis of patients with Types 3 and 4 paraesophageal hiatal hernias who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication without the use of an esophageal bougie, between December 1, 2010 and February 28, 2020, by a single surgeon at a community-based, academic hospital. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia and gastroesophageal dysmotility were excluded. Perioperative outcome measures included: recurrence; prolonged postoperative proton pump inhibitor use; dysphagia; re-operation, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 patients (34 males, 140 females) underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication. The average age was 63-years old. Four patients (2.3%) developed dysphagia with narrowing of the gastroesophageal junction, with one patient (0.6%) requiring postoperative esophageal dilation with bougie and eventual re-operation. Postoperative proton pump inhibitor use was 31.0% after 1 month. Overall hernia recurrence rate was 14.9% and the rate of re-operation was 6.3%. Overall mortality was 0.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication without an esophageal bougie is safe, effective, and efficient. Furthermore, bougie related risks are obviated with a comparable reported incidence of postoperative dysphagia and hiatal hernia recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/d7/e2022.00054.PMC9673992.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9093838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jae Young Kwack, Minji Seo, Ji Su Hong, Kyong Shil Im, Yong-Soon Kwon
Background and objective: Owing to the increasing trend of preserving fertility in adenomyomectomy, the need for laparoscopic adenomyomectomy has increased. This study aimed to introduce a new surgical technique, an advanced laparoscopic adenomyomectomy technique, and to evaluate its efficacy, benefits, and safety in focal uterine adenomyosis.
Methods: From February 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020, 47 patients who underwent laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using the new surgical technique were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Focal-type adenomyosis, diagnosed by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging that was refractory to medical treatments. (2) A strong desire to preserve the uterus. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon with a uniform technique.
Results: The mean patient age was 40.53 ± 5.93 years (median 38.5, range 32-47). The mean diameter of the adenomyoma lesions was 4.57 ± 1.21 cm and the mean weight of the excised lesions was 40.53 ± 35.65g (range, 15-209 g). The mean total operation time was 70.11 ± 15.05 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 88.88 ± 20.0 mL (20 - 500 ml). There was no conversion to laparotomy or major complications requiring reoperation. At the seven-month follow-up, there was complete remission of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia in 97.4% and 88.9% of the patients, respectively.
Conclusions: The new advanced laparoscopic adenomyomectomy technique with a three-step approach could be a safe and effective therapeutic method.
{"title":"Advanced Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy Technique for Focal Uterine Adenomyosis by Three-step Approach.","authors":"Jae Young Kwack, Minji Seo, Ji Su Hong, Kyong Shil Im, Yong-Soon Kwon","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Owing to the increasing trend of preserving fertility in adenomyomectomy, the need for laparoscopic adenomyomectomy has increased. This study aimed to introduce a new surgical technique, an advanced laparoscopic adenomyomectomy technique, and to evaluate its efficacy, benefits, and safety in focal uterine adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020, 47 patients who underwent laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using the new surgical technique were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Focal-type adenomyosis, diagnosed by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging that was refractory to medical treatments. (2) A strong desire to preserve the uterus. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon with a uniform technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 40.53 ± 5.93 years (median 38.5, range 32-47). The mean diameter of the adenomyoma lesions was 4.57 ± 1.21 cm and the mean weight of the excised lesions was 40.53 ± 35.65g (range, 15-209 g). The mean total operation time was 70.11 ± 15.05 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 88.88 ± 20.0 mL (20 - 500 ml). There was no conversion to laparotomy or major complications requiring reoperation. At the seven-month follow-up, there was complete remission of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia in 97.4% and 88.9% of the patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new advanced laparoscopic adenomyomectomy technique with a three-step approach could be a safe and effective therapeutic method.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/0b/e2022.00055.PMC9680819.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9078779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yanis Hamzaoui, Pietro Genova, Frédérique Peschaud, Robert Malafosse, Mostafa El Hajjam, Renato M Lupinacci
Background and objectives: Previous reports showed an increased risk of infectious complications when liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is performed simultaneously to colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare early and long-term outcomes of simultaneous versus staged strategy.
Methods: Data from colorectal cancer liver metastases consecutively treated by surgery of the primary tumor with an associated liver RFA procedure between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: RFA performed during colorectal surgery (simultaneous) or in a different moment (staged). Patients were manually matched (1:1) to minimize influence of known covariates.
Results: Seventy-two patients were included. After matching, there was no difference between the two groups in morbidity or mortality. Hospital stay was 2 days shorter in the simultaneous group.
Conclusions: Early or long-term outcomes were identical between the two strategies. The simultaneous strategy was associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization although not significant. Simultaneous colorectal resection and liver RFA is safe and must be included in surgeons' armamentarium.
{"title":"Safeness of Simultaneous Colonic Resection and Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation.","authors":"Yanis Hamzaoui, Pietro Genova, Frédérique Peschaud, Robert Malafosse, Mostafa El Hajjam, Renato M Lupinacci","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Previous reports showed an increased risk of infectious complications when liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is performed simultaneously to colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare early and long-term outcomes of simultaneous versus staged strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from colorectal cancer liver metastases consecutively treated by surgery of the primary tumor with an associated liver RFA procedure between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: RFA performed during colorectal surgery (simultaneous) or in a different moment (staged). Patients were manually matched (1:1) to minimize influence of known covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were included. After matching, there was no difference between the two groups in morbidity or mortality. Hospital stay was 2 days shorter in the simultaneous group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early or long-term outcomes were identical between the two strategies. The simultaneous strategy was associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization although not significant. Simultaneous colorectal resection and liver RFA is safe and must be included in surgeons' armamentarium.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3a/1e/e2022.00070.PMC9840214.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}